1.
Monk J. Gender in the landscape: expression of power and meaning. Inventing places: studies in cultural geography. New York: Wiley; 1992. p. 124–137.
2.
Rybczynski W. Domesticity . Home: a short history of an idea [Internet]. New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Viking; 1986. p. 51–75. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=07e491f4-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
3.
Cowan RS. The roads not taken: alternative social and technical approaches to housework. More work for mother: the ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. New York: Basic Books; 1983. p. 102-150-241–245.
4.
Thorne B. Feminist rethinking the family: an overview. Rethinking the family: some feminist questions [Internet]. Rev. ed. Boston: Northeastern University Press; 1992. p. 1-21, – 24. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=550bcb12-7d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
5.
Davidson C. Women’s Attitudes to Housework. A woman’s work is never done: a history of housework in the British Isles 1650-1950. London: Chatto & Windus; 1982.
6.
Thornton M. The Cartography of Public and Private. Public and private: feminist legal debates. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 1995. p. 2–16.
7.
Davidoff L. Regarding some ’old husbands’ tales’: public and private in feminist history. Feminism, the public and the private. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 164–194.
8.
Allen S, Wolkowitz C. Approaches to homeworking. Homeworking: myths and realities. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education; 1987. p. 10–29.
9.
Little et. al. J. Introduction: geography and gender in the urban environment. Women in cities: gender and the urban environment. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education; 1988. p. 1–20.
10.
Davidoff L. The rationalisation of housework. Sexual divisions revisited. London: Macmillan published in association with the British Sociological Association; 1990. p. 59–94.
11.
Hunt P. Gender and the constuction of home life. Home and family: creating the domestic sphere. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 1989. p. 66–81.
12.
Cockburn C, First-Dilić R. Introduction: Looking for the Gender-Technology Relation. Bringing technology home: gender and technology in a changing Europe. Buckingham [England]: Open University Press; 1994. p. 1–21.
13.
Pollock G. Modernity and the spaces of femininity. Vision and difference: femininity, feminism and histories of art. London: Routledge; 1988. p. 50–90.
14.
Gregson N, Lowe M. Theoretical and political reflections. Servicing the middle classes: class, gender and waged domestic labour in contemporary Britain. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 231–241.
15.
Johnston L, Valentine G. Wherever I lay my girlfriend, thats my home: the performance and surveillance of lesbian identities in domestic environments. Mapping desire: geographies of sexualities. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 99–113.
16.
Bell D, Valentine G. Home. Consuming geographies: we are where we eat. London: Routledge; 1997. p. 60–87.
17.
Duncan N. Negotiating gender and sexuality in public and private spaces. Body space: destabilising geographies of gender and sexuality. London: Routledge; 1996. p. 127–145.
18.
Ali Madanipour. Personal space of the body. Public and private spaces of the city. London: Routledge; 2003. p. 6–38.
19.
Davidoff L, Hall C. My own fireside: the creation of the middle-class home. Family fortunes: [men and women of the English middle class, 1780-1850]. Rev. ed. London: Routledge; 2002. p. 357–396.
20.
Gamarnikow E, Purvis J. Introduction. The Public and the private. London: Heinemann; 1983. p. 1–6.
21.
Reed C. Introduction: not at home. Not at home: the suppression of domesticity in modern art and architecture. London: Thames and Hudson; 1996. p. 7–17.
22.
Honig EA. Space of gender in seventeenth-century Dutch painting. Looking at seventeenth-century Dutch art: realism reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997. p. 187–201.
23.
Godard F. How do ways of life change? Beyond employment: household, gender and subsistence. Oxford: Blackwell; 1985. p. 317–337.
24.
Wolff J. Gender and the haunting of cities (or, the retirement of the flaneur). The invisible flâneuse?: gender, public space, and visual culture in nineteenth-century Paris. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2006. p. 18–31.
25.
Rose G. Women and everyday spaces. Feminism and geography: the limits of geographical knowledge. London: Polity Press; 1993. p. 17–40.
26.
McDowell L, Pringle R. Defining public and private issues. Defining women: Social institutions and gender divisions. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1992. p. 9–17.
27.
Davidoff L. Landscape with figures: home and community in English society. Worlds between: historical perspectives on gender and class. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1995. p. 41–72.
28.
McDowell L. Home, place and identity. Gender, identity and place: understanding feminist geographies. Cambridge: Polity; 1999. p. 71–95.
29.
Fassinger P. Meanings of housework for single fathers and mothers. Men, work, and family. London: Sage Publications; 1993. p. 195–216.
30.
Phil Hubbard. Women outdoors : destabilizing the public / private dichotomy. A companion to feminist geography. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2005. p. 322–333.
31.
Giles J. Legacies: the question of ‘home’ and women’s modernity. The parlour and the suburb: domestic identities, class, femininity and modernity. Oxford: Berg; 2004. p. 141–165.
32.
Heynen H. Modernity and domesticity:tensions and contradictions. Negotiating domesticity: spatial productions of gender in modern architecture. London: Routledge; 2005. p. 1–29.
33.
Tosh J. The ideal of domesticity. A man’s place: masculinity and the middle-class home in Victorian England. London: Yale University Press; 1999. p. 27–50.
34.
Sutton PC. The domestic life of women. Pieter de Hooch, 1629-1684. London: Dulwich Picture Gallery, Wadsworth Atheneum in association with Yale University Press; 1988. p. 68–75.
35.
Prugl E. Motherly women-breadwinning men: industrial homework and the construction of western welfare states. The global construction of gender: home-based work in the political economy of the 20th century. New York: Columbia University Press; 1999. p. 25–55.
36.
Hayden D. Community Kitchens and cooked food services. The grand domestic revolution: a history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1981. p. 206–227.
37.
Linda J. Nicholson. Feminist theory: the private and the public. Beyond domination: new perspectives on women and philosophy [Internet]. Totowa, N.J: Rowman & Littlefield; 1989. p. 221–230. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=adf4b4b5-7036-e711-80c9-005056af4099
38.
Gill Valentine. Women’s fear and the design of public space. Built environment. London: Kogan Page; 1990;16(4):288–303.
39.
Pratt G. Geographic metaphors in feminist theory. Making worlds: gender, metaphor, materiality. Tucson: University of Arizona Press; 1998. p. 13–30.
40.
Mary Romero. Bonds of sisterhood - bonds of oppression. Maid in the USA. New York: Routledge; 1992. p. 97–133.
41.
Daniels CR. Between home and factory: homeworkers and the state. Homework: historical and contemporary perspectives on paid labor at home. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1989. p. 13–32.
42.
Hooks B. Homeplace: a site of resistance. Yearning: race, gender, and culture. Toronto: Between the Lines; 1990. p. 41–49.
43.
Rivas LM. Invisible labours: caring for the independent person. Global woman: nannies, maids and sex workers in the new economy. London: Granta Books; 2003. p. 70–84.
44.
Sibley D. Private/public. Cultural geography: a critical dictionary of key concepts. London: I.B. Tauris; 2005. p. 155–160.
45.
Anderson B. Dr Jekyll and Mrs Hyde: defining domestic work. Doing the dirty work?: the global politics of domestic labour. London: Zed Books; 2000. p. 9–27.
46.
Soja EM. Increasing the openness of thirdspace. Thirdspace: journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell; 1996. p. 106–144.
47.
Boys J, Matrix. House design and women’s roles. Making space: women and the man-made environment. London: Pluto Press; 1984. p. 55–80.
48.
Oakley A. Socialization and self-concept. The sociology of housework. London: Martin Robertson; 1974. p. 113–134.
49.
Casteras S. Of Queens’ gardens" and the model Victorian lady. Images of Victorian womanhood in English art. London: Associate University Presses; 1987. p. 50–73.
50.
Madigan R, Munro M, Smith SJ. Gender and the meaning of the home. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 1990 Dec;14(4):625–647.
51.
Gillis J. No place like home. A world of their own making: a history of myth and ritual in family life. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997. p. 109–128.
52.
Gregson N, Lowe M. Renegotiating the domestic division of labour? A study of dual career households in north east and south east England. The Sociological Review. 2008 Jun 28;41(3):475–505.
53.
Bondi L. Gender, class and urban space: public and private space in contemporary urban landscapes. Urban Geography. 1998 Feb 1;19(2):160–185.
54.
McNay, Lois. Gender, subjectification and agency: introductory remarks. Gender and agency: reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory [Internet]. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2000. p. 1–21. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d56e1a96-6736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
55.
McDowell, Linda. Up close and personal: intimate work in the home. Working bodies: interactive service employment and workplace identities [Internet]. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. p. 79–98. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=80c940f0-7a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
56.
Cohen, Deborah. Cathedrals to commerce: shoppers and entrepreneurs. Household gods: the British and their possessions [Internet]. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2006. p. 32–62. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c7e7aaed-4f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
