1.
Monk J. Gender in the landscape: expression of power and meaning. In: Inventing Places: Studies in Cultural Geography. Wiley; 1992:124-137.
2.
Rybczynski W. Domesticity . In: Home: A Short History of an Idea. Viking; 1986:51-75. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=07e491f4-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
3.
Cowan RS. The roads not taken: alternative social and technical approaches to housework. In: More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. Basic Books; 1983:102-150-241-245.
4.
Thorne B. Feminist rethinking the family: an overview. In: Rethinking the Family: Some Feminist Questions. Rev. ed. Northeastern University Press; 1992:1-21, - 24. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=550bcb12-7d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
5.
Davidson C. Women’s Attitudes to Housework. In: A Woman’s Work Is Never Done: A History of Housework in the British Isles 1650-1950. Chatto & Windus; 1982.
6.
Thornton M. The Cartography of Public and Private. In: Public and Private: Feminist Legal Debates. Oxford University Press; 1995:2-16.
7.
Davidoff L. Regarding some ’old husbands’ tales’: public and private in feminist history. In: Feminism, the Public and the Private. Vol Oxford readings in feminism. Oxford University Press; 1998:164-194.
8.
Allen S, Wolkowitz C. Approaches to homeworking. In: Homeworking: Myths and Realities. Vol Women in society. Macmillan Education; 1987:10-29.
9.
Little et. al. J. Introduction: geography and gender in the urban environment. In: Women in Cities: Gender and the Urban Environment. Vol Women in society. Macmillan Education; 1988:1-20.
10.
Davidoff L. The rationalisation of housework. In: Sexual Divisions Revisited. Macmillan published in association with the British Sociological Association; 1990:59-94.
11.
Hunt P. Gender and the constuction of home life. In: Home and Family: Creating the Domestic Sphere. Palgrave; 1989:66-81.
12.
Cockburn C, First-Dilić R. Introduction: Looking for the Gender-Technology Relation. In: Bringing Technology Home: Gender and Technology in a Changing Europe. Open University Press; 1994:1-21.
13.
Pollock G. Modernity and the spaces of femininity. In: Vision and Difference: Femininity, Feminism and Histories of Art. Routledge; 1988:50-90.
14.
Gregson N, Lowe M. Theoretical and political reflections. In: Servicing the Middle Classes: Class, Gender and Waged Domestic Labour in Contemporary Britain. Vol International studies of women and place. Routledge; 1994:231-241.
15.
Johnston L, Valentine G. Wherever I lay my girlfriend, thats my home: the performance and surveillance of lesbian identities in domestic environments. In: Mapping Desire: Geographies of Sexualities. Routledge; 1994:99-113.
16.
Bell D, Valentine G. Home. In: Consuming Geographies: We Are Where We Eat. Routledge; 1997:60-87.
17.
Duncan N. Negotiating gender and sexuality in public and private spaces. In: Body Space: Destabilising Geographies of Gender and Sexuality. Routledge; 1996:127-145.
18.
Ali Madanipour. Personal space of the body. In: Public and Private Spaces of the City. Routledge; 2003:6-38.
19.
Davidoff L, Hall C. My own fireside: the creation of the middle-class home. In: Family Fortunes: [Men and Women of the English Middle Class, 1780-1850]. Rev. ed. Routledge; 2002:357-396.
20.
Gamarnikow E, Purvis J. Introduction. In: The Public and the Private. Heinemann; 1983:1-6.
21.
Reed C. Introduction: not at home. In: Not at Home: The Suppression of Domesticity in Modern Art and Architecture. Thames and Hudson; 1996:7-17.
22.
Honig EA. Space of gender in seventeenth-century Dutch painting. In: Looking at Seventeenth-Century Dutch Art: Realism Reconsidered. Cambridge University Press; 1997:187-201.
23.
Godard F. How do ways of life change? In: Beyond Employment: Household, Gender and Subsistence. Blackwell; 1985:317-337.
24.
Wolff J. Gender and the haunting of cities (or, the retirement of the flaneur). In: The Invisible Flâneuse?: Gender, Public Space, and Visual Culture in Nineteenth-Century Paris. Vol Critical perspectives in art history. Manchester University Press; 2006:18-31.
25.
Rose G. Women and everyday spaces. In: Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. Polity Press; 1993:17-40.
26.
McDowell L, Pringle R. Defining public and private issues. In: Defining Women: Social Institutions and Gender Divisions. Polity Press; 1992:9-17.
27.
Davidoff L. Landscape with figures: home and community in English society. In: Worlds between: Historical Perspectives on Gender and Class. Polity Press; 1995:41-72.
28.
McDowell L. Home, place and identity. In: Gender, Identity and Place: Understanding Feminist Geographies. Polity; 1999:71-95.
29.
Fassinger P. Meanings of housework for single fathers and mothers. In: Men, Work, and Family. Vol Research on men and masculinities series. Sage Publications; 1993:195-216.
30.
Phil Hubbard. Women outdoors : destabilizing the public / private dichotomy. In: A Companion to Feminist Geography. Vol Blackwell companions to geography. Blackwell; 2005:322-333.
31.
Giles J. Legacies: the question of ‘home’ and women’s modernity. In: The Parlour and the Suburb: Domestic Identities, Class, Femininity and Modernity. Berg; 2004:141-165.
32.
Heynen H. Modernity and domesticity:tensions and contradictions. In: Negotiating Domesticity: Spatial Productions of Gender in Modern Architecture. Routledge; 2005:1-29.
33.
Tosh J. The ideal of domesticity. In: A Man’s Place: Masculinity and the Middle-Class Home in Victorian England. Yale University Press; 1999:27-50.
34.
Sutton PC. The domestic life of women. In: Pieter de Hooch, 1629-1684. Dulwich Picture Gallery, Wadsworth Atheneum in association with Yale University Press; 1988:68-75.
35.
Prugl E. Motherly women-breadwinning men: industrial homework and the construction of western welfare states. In: The Global Construction of Gender: Home-Based Work in the Political Economy of the 20th Century. Columbia University Press; 1999:25-55.
36.
Hayden D. Community Kitchens and cooked food services. In: The Grand Domestic Revolution: A History of Feminist Designs for American Homes, Neighborhoods, and Cities. MIT Press; 1981:206-227.
37.
Linda J. Nicholson. Feminist theory: the private and the public. In: Beyond Domination: New Perspectives on Women and Philosophy. Vol New feminist perspectives series. Rowman & Littlefield; 1989:221-230. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=adf4b4b5-7036-e711-80c9-005056af4099
38.
Gill Valentine. Women’s fear and the design of public space. Built environment. 1990;16(4):288-303.
39.
Pratt G. Geographic metaphors in feminist theory. In: Making Worlds: Gender, Metaphor, Materiality. University of Arizona Press; 1998:13-30.
40.
Mary Romero. Bonds of sisterhood - bonds of oppression. In: Maid in the U.S.A. Vol Perspectives on gender. Routledge; 1992:97-133.
41.
Daniels CR. Between home and factory: homeworkers and the state. In: Homework: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Paid Labor at Home. University of Illinois Press; 1989:13-32.
42.
Hooks B. Homeplace: a site of resistance. In: Yearning: Race, Gender, and Culture. Between the Lines; 1990:41-49.
43.
Rivas LM. Invisible labours: caring for the independent person. In: Global Woman: Nannies, Maids and Sex Workers in the New Economy. Granta Books; 2003:70-84.
44.
Sibley D. Private/public. In: Cultural Geography: A Critical Dictionary of Key Concepts. Vol International library of human geography. I.B. Tauris; 2005:155-160.
45.
Anderson B. Dr Jekyll and Mrs Hyde: defining domestic work. In: Doing the Dirty Work?: The Global Politics of Domestic Labour. Zed Books; 2000:9-27.
46.
Soja EM. Increasing the openness of thirdspace. In: Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Blackwell; 1996:106-144.
47.
Boys J, Matrix. House design and women’s roles. In: Making Space: Women and the Man-Made Environment. Pluto Press; 1984:55-80.
48.
Oakley A. Socialization and self-concept. In: The Sociology of Housework. Martin Robertson; 1974:113-134.
49.
Casteras S. Of Queens’ gardens" and the model Victorian lady. In: Images of Victorian Womanhood in English Art. Associate University Presses; 1987:50-73.
50.
Madigan R, Munro M, Smith SJ. Gender and the meaning of the home. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 1990;14(4):625-647. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.1990.tb00160.x
51.
Gillis J. No place like home. In: A World of Their Own Making: A History of Myth and Ritual in Family Life. Oxford University Press; 1997:109-128.
52.
Gregson N, Lowe M. Renegotiating the domestic division of labour? A study of dual career households in north east and south east England. The Sociological Review. 2008;41(3):475-505. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1993.tb00074.x
53.
Bondi L. Gender, class and urban space: public and private space in contemporary urban landscapes. Urban Geography. 1998;19(2):160-185. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.19.2.160
54.
McNay, Lois. Gender, subjectification and agency: introductory remarks. In: Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and Social Theory. Polity Press; 2000:1-21. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d56e1a96-6736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
55.
McDowell, Linda. Up close and personal: intimate work in the home. In: Working Bodies: Interactive Service Employment and Workplace Identities. Vol Studies in urban and social change. Wiley-Blackwell; 2009:79-98. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=80c940f0-7a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
56.
Cohen, Deborah. Cathedrals to commerce: shoppers and entrepreneurs. In: Household Gods: The British and Their Possessions. Yale University Press; 2006:32-62. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c7e7aaed-4f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
