[1]
J. Monk , ‘Gender in the landscape: expression of power and meaning’, in Inventing places: studies in cultural geography, New York: Wiley, 1992, pp. 124–137.
[2]
W. Rybczynski, ‘Domesticity ’, in Home: a short history of an idea, New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Viking, 1986, pp. 51–75 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=07e491f4-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[3]
R. S. Cowan, ‘The roads not taken: alternative social and technical approaches to housework’, in More work for mother: the ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave, New York: Basic Books, 1983, pp. 102-150-241–245.
[4]
B. Thorne , ‘Feminist rethinking the family: an overview’, in Rethinking the family: some feminist questions, Rev. ed., Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1992, pp. 1-21, – 24 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=550bcb12-7d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[5]
C. Davidson , ‘Women’s Attitudes to Housework’, in A woman’s work is never done: a history of housework in the British Isles 1650-1950, London: Chatto & Windus, 1982.
[6]
M. Thornton , ‘The Cartography of Public and Private’, in Public and private: feminist legal debates, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 2–16.
[7]
L. Davidoff, ‘Regarding some ’old husbands’ tales’: public and private in feminist history’, in Feminism, the public and the private, vol. Oxford readings in feminism, New York: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 164–194.
[8]
S. Allen and C. Wolkowitz, ‘Approaches to homeworking’, in Homeworking: myths and realities, vol. Women in society, Basingstoke: Macmillan Education, 1987, pp. 10–29.
[9]
J. Little et. al. , ‘Introduction: geography and gender in the urban environment’, in Women in cities: gender and the urban environment, vol. Women in society, Basingstoke: Macmillan Education, 1988, pp. 1–20.
[10]
L. Davidoff , ‘The rationalisation of housework’, in Sexual divisions revisited, London: Macmillan published in association with the British Sociological Association, 1990, pp. 59–94.
[11]
P. Hunt , ‘Gender and the constuction of home life’, in Home and family: creating the domestic sphere, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1989, pp. 66–81.
[12]
C. Cockburn and R. First-Dilić, ‘Introduction: Looking for the Gender-Technology Relation’, in Bringing technology home: gender and technology in a changing Europe, Buckingham [England]: Open University Press, 1994, pp. 1–21.
[13]
G. Pollock, ‘Modernity and the spaces of femininity’, in Vision and difference: femininity, feminism and histories of art, London: Routledge, 1988, pp. 50–90.
[14]
N. Gregson and M. Lowe, ‘Theoretical and political reflections’, in Servicing the middle classes: class, gender and waged domestic labour in contemporary Britain, vol. International studies of women and place, London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 231–241.
[15]
L. Johnston and G. Valentine , ‘Wherever I lay my girlfriend, thats my home: the performance and surveillance of lesbian identities in domestic environments’, in Mapping desire: geographies of sexualities, London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 99–113.
[16]
D. Bell and G. Valentine , ‘Home’, in Consuming geographies: we are where we eat, London: Routledge, 1997, pp. 60–87.
[17]
N. Duncan, ‘Negotiating gender and sexuality in public and private spaces’, in Body space: destabilising geographies of gender and sexuality, London: Routledge, 1996, pp. 127–145.
[18]
Ali Madanipour, ‘Personal space of the body’, in Public and private spaces of the city, London: Routledge, 2003, pp. 6–38.
[19]
L. Davidoff and C. Hall, ‘My own fireside: the creation of the middle-class home’, in Family fortunes: [men and women of the English middle class, 1780-1850], Rev. ed., London: Routledge, 2002, pp. 357–396.
[20]
E. Gamarnikow and J. Purvis, ‘Introduction’, in The Public and the private, London: Heinemann, 1983, pp. 1–6.
[21]
C. Reed , ‘Introduction: not at home’, in Not at home: the suppression of domesticity in modern art and architecture, London: Thames and Hudson, 1996, pp. 7–17.
[22]
E. A. Honig, ‘Space of gender in seventeenth-century Dutch painting’, in Looking at seventeenth-century Dutch art: realism reconsidered, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 187–201.
[23]
F. Godard , ‘How do ways of life change?’, in Beyond employment: household, gender and subsistence, Oxford: Blackwell, 1985, pp. 317–337.
[24]
J. Wolff, ‘Gender and the haunting of cities (or, the retirement of the flaneur)’, in The invisible flâneuse?: gender, public space, and visual culture in nineteenth-century Paris, vol. Critical perspectives in art history, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2006, pp. 18–31.
[25]
G. Rose , ‘Women and everyday spaces’, in Feminism and geography: the limits of geographical knowledge, London: Polity Press, 1993, pp. 17–40.
[26]
L. McDowell and R. Pringle, ‘Defining public and private issues’, in Defining women: Social institutions and gender divisions, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992, pp. 9–17.
[27]
L. Davidoff, ‘Landscape with figures: home and community in English society’, in Worlds between: historical perspectives on gender and class, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995, pp. 41–72.
[28]
L. McDowell, ‘Home, place and identity’, in Gender, identity and place: understanding feminist geographies, Cambridge: Polity, 1999, pp. 71–95.
[29]
P. Fassinger, ‘Meanings of housework for single fathers and mothers’, in Men, work, and family, vol. Research on men and masculinities series, London: Sage Publications, 1993, pp. 195–216.
[30]
Phil Hubbard, ‘Women outdoors : destabilizing the public / private dichotomy’, in A companion to feminist geography, vol. Blackwell companions to geography, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2005, pp. 322–333.
[31]
J. Giles, ‘Legacies: the question of “home” and women’s modernity’, in The parlour and the suburb: domestic identities, class, femininity and modernity, Oxford: Berg, 2004, pp. 141–165.
[32]
H. Heynen, ‘Modernity and domesticity:tensions and contradictions’, in Negotiating domesticity: spatial productions of gender in modern architecture, London: Routledge, 2005, pp. 1–29.
[33]
J. Tosh, ‘The ideal of domesticity’, in A man’s place: masculinity and the middle-class home in Victorian England, London: Yale University Press, 1999, pp. 27–50.
[34]
P. C. Sutton, ‘The domestic life of women’, in Pieter de Hooch, 1629-1684, London: Dulwich Picture Gallery, Wadsworth Atheneum in association with Yale University Press, 1988, pp. 68–75.
[35]
E. Prugl, ‘Motherly women-breadwinning men: industrial homework and the construction of western welfare states’, in The global construction of gender: home-based work in the political economy of the 20th century, New York: Columbia University Press, 1999, pp. 25–55.
[36]
D. Hayden, ‘Community Kitchens and cooked food services’, in The grand domestic revolution: a history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1981, pp. 206–227.
[37]
Linda J. Nicholson, ‘Feminist theory: the private and the public’, in Beyond domination: new perspectives on women and philosophy, vol. New feminist perspectives series, Totowa, N.J: Rowman & Littlefield, 1989, pp. 221–230 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=adf4b4b5-7036-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[38]
Gill Valentine, ‘Women’s fear and the design of public space’, Built environment, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 288–303, 1990.
[39]
G. Pratt, ‘Geographic metaphors in feminist theory’, in Making worlds: gender, metaphor, materiality, Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1998, pp. 13–30.
[40]
Mary Romero, ‘Bonds of sisterhood - bonds of oppression’, in Maid in the U.S.A, vol. Perspectives on gender, New York: Routledge, 1992, pp. 97–133.
[41]
C. R. Daniels, ‘Between home and factory: homeworkers and the state’, in Homework: historical and contemporary perspectives on paid labor at home, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1989, pp. 13–32.
[42]
B. Hooks, ‘Homeplace: a site of resistance’, in Yearning: race, gender, and culture, Toronto: Between the Lines, 1990, pp. 41–49.
[43]
L. M. Rivas, ‘Invisible labours: caring for the independent person’, in Global woman: nannies, maids and sex workers in the new economy, London: Granta Books, 2003, pp. 70–84.
[44]
D. Sibley, ‘Private/public’, in Cultural geography: a critical dictionary of key concepts, vol. International library of human geography, London: I.B. Tauris, 2005, pp. 155–160.
[45]
B. Anderson , ‘Dr Jekyll and Mrs Hyde: defining domestic work’, in Doing the dirty work?: the global politics of domestic labour, London: Zed Books, 2000, pp. 9–27.
[46]
E. M. Soja, ‘Increasing the openness of thirdspace’, in Thirdspace: journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places, Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell, 1996, pp. 106–144.
[47]
J. Boys and Matrix, ‘House design and women’s roles’, in Making space: women and the man-made environment, London: Pluto Press, 1984, pp. 55–80.
[48]
A. Oakley, ‘Socialization and self-concept’, in The sociology of housework, London: Martin Robertson, 1974, pp. 113–134.
[49]
S. Casteras, ‘Of Queens’ gardens" and the model Victorian lady’, in Images of Victorian womanhood in English art, London: Associate University Presses, 1987, pp. 50–73.
[50]
R. Madigan, M. Munro, and S. J. Smith, ‘Gender and the meaning of the home’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 625–647, Dec. 1990, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.1990.tb00160.x.
[51]
J. Gillis, ‘No place like home’, in A world of their own making: a history of myth and ritual in family life, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997, pp. 109–128.
[52]
N. Gregson and M. Lowe, ‘Renegotiating the domestic division of labour? A study of dual career households in north east and south east England’, The Sociological Review, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 475–505, Jun. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1993.tb00074.x.
[53]
L. Bondi, ‘Gender, class and urban space: public and private space in contemporary urban landscapes’, Urban Geography, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 160–185, Feb. 1998, doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.19.2.160.
[54]
McNay, Lois, ‘Gender, subjectification and agency: introductory remarks’, in Gender and agency: reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000, pp. 1–21 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d56e1a96-6736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[55]
McDowell, Linda, ‘Up close and personal: intimate work in the home’, in Working bodies: interactive service employment and workplace identities, vol. Studies in urban and social change, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, pp. 79–98 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=80c940f0-7a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[56]
Cohen, Deborah, ‘Cathedrals to commerce: shoppers and entrepreneurs’, in Household gods: the British and their possessions, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006, pp. 32–62 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c7e7aaed-4f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
