1
Monk J. Gender in the landscape: expression of power and meaning. In: Inventing places: studies in cultural geography. New York: : Wiley 1992. 124–37.
2
Rybczynski W. Domesticity . In: Home: a short history of an idea. New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: : Viking 1986. 51–75.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=07e491f4-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
3
Cowan RS. The roads not taken: alternative social and technical approaches to housework. In: More work for mother: the ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. New York: : Basic Books 1983. 102-150-241–5.
4
Thorne B. Feminist rethinking the family: an overview. In: Rethinking the family: some feminist questions. Boston: : Northeastern University Press 1992. 1-21, – 24.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=550bcb12-7d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
5
Davidson C. Women’s Attitudes to Housework. In: A woman’s work is never done: a history of housework in the British Isles 1650-1950. London: : Chatto & Windus 1982.
6
Thornton M. The Cartography of Public and Private. In: Public and private: feminist legal debates. Melbourne: : Oxford University Press 1995. 2–16.
7
Davidoff L. Regarding some ’old husbands’ tales’: public and private in feminist history. In: Feminism, the public and the private. New York: : Oxford University Press 1998. 164–94.
8
Allen S, Wolkowitz C. Approaches to homeworking. In: Homeworking: myths and realities. Basingstoke: : Macmillan Education 1987. 10–29.
9
Little et. al. J. Introduction: geography and gender in the urban environment. In: Women in cities: gender and the urban environment. Basingstoke: : Macmillan Education 1988. 1–20.
10
Davidoff L. The rationalisation of housework. In: Sexual divisions revisited. London: : Macmillan published in association with the British Sociological Association 1990. 59–94.
11
Hunt P. Gender and the constuction of home life. In: Home and family: creating the domestic sphere. Basingstoke: : Palgrave 1989. 66–81.
12
Cockburn C, First-Dilić R. Introduction: Looking for the Gender-Technology Relation. In: Bringing technology home: gender and technology in a changing Europe. Buckingham [England]: : Open University Press 1994. 1–21.
13
Pollock G. Modernity and the spaces of femininity. In: Vision and difference: femininity, feminism and histories of art. London: : Routledge 1988. 50–90.
14
Gregson N, Lowe M. Theoretical and political reflections. In: Servicing the middle classes: class, gender and waged domestic labour in contemporary Britain. London: : Routledge 1994. 231–41.
15
Johnston L, Valentine G. Wherever I lay my girlfriend, thats my home: the performance and surveillance of lesbian identities in domestic environments. In: Mapping desire: geographies of sexualities. London: : Routledge 1994. 99–113.
16
Bell D, Valentine G. Home. In: Consuming geographies: we are where we eat. London: : Routledge 1997. 60–87.
17
Duncan N. Negotiating gender and sexuality in public and private spaces. In: Body space: destabilising geographies of gender and sexuality. London: : Routledge 1996. 127–45.
18
Ali Madanipour. Personal space of the body. In: Public and private spaces of the city. London: : Routledge 2003. 6–38.
19
Davidoff L, Hall C. My own fireside: the creation of the middle-class home. In: Family fortunes: [men and women of the English middle class, 1780-1850]. London: : Routledge 2002. 357–96.
20
Gamarnikow E, Purvis J. Introduction. In: The Public and the private. London: : Heinemann 1983. 1–6.
21
Reed C. Introduction: not at home. In: Not at home: the suppression of domesticity in modern art and architecture. London: : Thames and Hudson 1996. 7–17.
22
Honig EA. Space of gender in seventeenth-century Dutch painting. In: Looking at seventeenth-century Dutch art: realism reconsidered. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1997. 187–201.
23
Godard F. How do ways of life change? In: Beyond employment: household, gender and subsistence. Oxford: : Blackwell 1985. 317–37.
24
Wolff J. Gender and the haunting of cities (or, the retirement of the flaneur). In: The invisible flâneuse?: gender, public space, and visual culture in nineteenth-century Paris. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 2006. 18–31.
25
Rose G. Women and everyday spaces. In: Feminism and geography: the limits of geographical knowledge. London: : Polity Press 1993. 17–40.
26
McDowell L, Pringle R. Defining public and private issues. In: Defining women: Social institutions and gender divisions. Cambridge: : Polity Press 1992. 9–17.
27
Davidoff L. Landscape with figures: home and community in English society. In: Worlds between: historical perspectives on gender and class. Cambridge: : Polity Press 1995. 41–72.
28
McDowell L. Home, place and identity. In: Gender, identity and place: understanding feminist geographies. Cambridge: : Polity 1999. 71–95.
29
Fassinger P. Meanings of housework for single fathers and mothers. In: Men, work, and family. London: : Sage Publications 1993. 195–216.
30
Phil Hubbard. Women outdoors : destabilizing the public / private dichotomy. In: A companion to feminist geography. Malden, MA: : Blackwell 2005. 322–33.
31
Giles J. Legacies: the question of ‘home’ and women’s modernity. In: The parlour and the suburb: domestic identities, class, femininity and modernity. Oxford: : Berg 2004. 141–65.
32
Heynen H. Modernity and domesticity:tensions and contradictions. In: Negotiating domesticity: spatial productions of gender in modern architecture. London: : Routledge 2005. 1–29.
33
Tosh J. The ideal of domesticity. In: A man’s place: masculinity and the middle-class home in Victorian England. London: : Yale University Press 1999. 27–50.
34
Sutton PC. The domestic life of women. In: Pieter de Hooch, 1629-1684. London: : Dulwich Picture Gallery, Wadsworth Atheneum in association with Yale University Press 1988. 68–75.
35
Prugl E. Motherly women-breadwinning men: industrial homework and the construction of western welfare states. In: The global construction of gender: home-based work in the political economy of the 20th century. New York: : Columbia University Press 1999. 25–55.
36
Hayden D. Community Kitchens and cooked food services. In: The grand domestic revolution: a history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1981. 206–27.
37
Linda J. Nicholson. Feminist theory: the private and the public. In: Beyond domination: new perspectives on women and philosophy. Totowa, N.J: : Rowman & Littlefield 1989. 221–30.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=adf4b4b5-7036-e711-80c9-005056af4099
38
Gill Valentine. Women’s fear and the design of public space. Built environment 1990;16:288–303.
39
Pratt G. Geographic metaphors in feminist theory. In: Making worlds: gender, metaphor, materiality. Tucson: : University of Arizona Press 1998. 13–30.
40
Mary Romero. Bonds of sisterhood - bonds of oppression. In: Maid in the U.S.A. New York: : Routledge 1992. 97–133.
41
Daniels CR. Between home and factory: homeworkers and the state. In: Homework: historical and contemporary perspectives on paid labor at home. Urbana: : University of Illinois Press 1989. 13–32.
42
Hooks B. Homeplace: a site of resistance. In: Yearning: race, gender, and culture. Toronto: : Between the Lines 1990. 41–9.
43
Rivas LM. Invisible labours: caring for the independent person. In: Global woman: nannies, maids and sex workers in the new economy. London: : Granta Books 2003. 70–84.
44
Sibley D. Private/public. In: Cultural geography: a critical dictionary of key concepts. London: : I.B. Tauris 2005. 155–60.
45
Anderson B. Dr Jekyll and Mrs Hyde: defining domestic work. In: Doing the dirty work?: the global politics of domestic labour. London: : Zed Books 2000. 9–27.
46
Soja EM. Increasing the openness of thirdspace. In: Thirdspace: journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Cambridge, Mass: : Blackwell 1996. 106–44.
47
Boys J, Matrix. House design and women’s roles. In: Making space: women and the man-made environment. London: : Pluto Press 1984. 55–80.
48
Oakley A. Socialization and self-concept. In: The sociology of housework. London: : Martin Robertson 1974. 113–34.
49
Casteras S. Of Queens’ gardens" and the model Victorian lady. In: Images of Victorian womanhood in English art. London: : Associate University Presses 1987. 50–73.
50
Madigan R, Munro M, Smith SJ. Gender and the meaning of the home. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 1990;14:625–47. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.1990.tb00160.x
51
Gillis J. No place like home. In: A world of their own making: a history of myth and ritual in family life. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1997. 109–28.
52
Gregson N, Lowe M. Renegotiating the domestic division of labour? A study of dual career households in north east and south east England. The Sociological Review 2008;41:475–505. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1993.tb00074.x
53
Bondi L. Gender, class and urban space: public and private space in contemporary urban landscapes. Urban Geography 1998;19:160–85. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.19.2.160
54
McNay, Lois. Gender, subjectification and agency: introductory remarks. In: Gender and agency: reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2000. 1–21.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d56e1a96-6736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
55
McDowell, Linda. Up close and personal: intimate work in the home. In: Working bodies: interactive service employment and workplace identities. Oxford: : Wiley-Blackwell 2009. 79–98.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=80c940f0-7a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
56
Cohen, Deborah. Cathedrals to commerce: shoppers and entrepreneurs. In: Household gods: the British and their possessions. New Haven: : Yale University Press 2006. 32–62.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c7e7aaed-4f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
