[1]
Laurence Whitehead, ‘On “Democracy” and “Democratization”’, in Democratization: Theory and Experience, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 6–35 [Online]. Available: https://academic.oup.com/book/2667
[2]
Damarys Canache, ‘Citizens’ Conceptualizations of Democracy: Structured Complexity, Substantive Context, and Political Significance’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1132–1158, doi: 10.1177/0010414011434009. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cpsa/45/9
[3]
G. A. O’Donnell and P. C. Schmitter, Transitions from authoritarian rule: Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies, vol. 4. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013.
[4]
A. Przeworski, ‘Some Problems in the Study of the Transition to Democracy’, in Transitions from authoritarian rule: comparative perspectives, vol. 3, Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986, pp. 47-63-168–170 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c5f97747-6c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[5]
Dietrich Rueschemeyer, ‘Introduction: the Problem of Capitalist Development and Democracy’, in Capitalist development and democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992, pp. 1-11–309 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=0b3a704f-4e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[6]
S. P. Huntington, The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century, vol. The Julian J. Rothbaum distinguished lecture series. Norman [Okla.]: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.
[7]
Carles Boix and Susan C. Stokes, ‘Endogenous democratization’, World Politics, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 517–549, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/25054237
[8]
J. J. Linz and A. C. Stepan, Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
[9]
Dankwart A. Rustow, ‘Transitions to democracy: Toward a dynamic model’, Comparative Politics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 337–363, 1970 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/421307
[10]
A. Przeworski, ‘Democracy as a contingent outcome of conflicts’, in Constitutionalism and Democracy, 1988 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ebook.jsf?bid=CBO9781139173629
[11]
J. A. Peeler, ‘Elite settlements and democratic consolidation: Colombia, Costa Rica, and Venezuela’, in Elites and Democratic consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 81–112 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3d8884da-5a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[12]
John Higley and Michael G. Burton, ‘The elite variable in democratic transitions and breakdowns’, American Sociological Review, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 17–32, 1989 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095659
[13]
Seymour Martin Lipset, ‘Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 69–105, 1959 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/1951731
[14]
Jonathan Hartlyn and Arturo Valenzuela, ‘Democracy in Latin America since 1930’, in The Cambridge History of Latin America, vol. VI, Leslie Bethell, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 97–162 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-latin-america/democracy-in-latin-america-since-1930/B47ADB618DF2547885A2EE8F9E2A53BA
[15]
J. A. Peeler, Building democracy in Latin America, 3rd ed. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner, 2009.
[16]
L. Diamond, J. Hartlyn, and J. J. Linz, ‘Introduction: Politics, society, and democracy in Latin America’, in Democracy in developing countries: Latin America, 2nd ed., Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999, pp. 1–70 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b21150d4-231e-ed11-bd6e-a04a5e5d2f8d
[17]
K. L. Remmer, ‘Democratization in Latin America’, in Global transformation and the Third World, Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1993, pp. 91–111 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ffcb6746-241e-ed11-bd6e-a04a5e5d2f8d
[18]
T. L. Karl and P. C. Schmitter, ‘Modes of transition in Latin America, Southern and Eastern Europe’, International social science journal, vol. XLIII, no. 128, pp. 269–284, 1991.
[19]
J. M. Malloy and M. A. Seligson, Authoritarians and democrats: regime transition in Latin America, vol. Pitt Latin American series. Pittsburgh, Pa: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1987.
[20]
Douglas A. Chalmers and Craig H. Robinson, ‘Why power contenders choose liberalization: Perspectives from South America’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 3–36, 1982 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/2600597
[21]
Marcelo Cavarozzi, ‘Beyond transitions to democracy in Latin America’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 665–684, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/156779
[22]
M. A. Garretón Merino and E. Newman, Democracy in Latin America: (re)constructing political society, vol. Changing nature of democracy. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2001.
[23]
Georgina Waylen, ‘Women and democratization: Conceptualizing gender relations in transition politics’, World Politics, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 327–354, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/2950685
[24]
Manuel Antonio Garreton M., ‘Human rights in processes of democratisation’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 221–234, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/157864
[25]
R. S. Hillman, J. A. Peeler, and E. Cardozo de Da Silva, Democracy and human rights in Latin America. Westport, Conn: Praeger, 2002.
[26]
Alfred Stepan and Cindy Skach, ‘Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation: Parliamentarianism versus presidentialism’, World Politics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/2950664
[27]
Ryan E. Carlin and Matthew M. Singer, ‘Support for Polyarchy in the Americas’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 1500–1526, doi: 10.1177/0010414011407471. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cpsa/44/11
[28]
G. O’Donnell, ‘Tensions in the bureaucratic-authoritarian state and the question of democracy’, in Counterpoints: selected essays on authoritarianism and democratization, Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5576ef6b-efbc-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[29]
O. Guillermo, ‘Tensions in the Bureaucratic-Authoritarian State and the Question of Democracy’, in The new authoritarianism in Latin America, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979, pp. 285–318.
[30]
G. O’Donnell, ‘Notes for the study of processes of political democratization in the wake of the bureaucratic-authoritarian state’, in Counterpoints: selected essays on authoritarianism and democratization, Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press, 1999, pp. 109–129 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9f5bd119-e688-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[31]
A. Stepan, ‘The military in newly democratic regimes: the dimension of military contestation’, in Rethinking military politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1988, pp. 68–92 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=233c0a7a-6136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[32]
Alfred C. Stepan, ‘The military in newly democratic regimes: the dimension of military prerogatives’, in Rethinking military politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1988, pp. 93–127 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv15r5d8r.11
[33]
A. Rouquié, ‘Demilitarization and the institutionalization of military-dominated politics in Latin America’, in Transitions from authoritarian rule: comparative perspectives, Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986, pp. 108–136.
[34]
A. Rouquié, The military and the state in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.
[35]
David Pion-Berlin, ‘Military autonomy and emerging democracies in South America’, Comparative Politics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 83–102, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/422098
[36]
Wendy Hunter, ‘Contradictions of civilian control: Argentina, Brazil and Chile in the 1990s’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 633–653, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/3993062
[37]
J. S. Fitch, ‘Democracy, human rights, and the armed forces in Latin America’, in The United States and Latin America in the 1990s: beyond the cold war, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992, pp. 181–213.
[38]
F. Panizza, ‘Human Rights in the Processes of Transition and Consolidation of Democracy in Latin America’, Political Studies, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 168–188, Mar. 1995, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1995.tb01742.x.
[39]
A. W. Pereira, Political (in)justice: authoritarianism and the rule of law in Brazil, Chile, and Argentina, vol. Pitt Latin American series. Pittsburgh, Pa: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2005.
[40]
J. Samuel Valenzuela, ‘Labor movements in transitions to democracy: A framework for analysis’, Comparative Politics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 445–472, 1989 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/422007
[41]
Christian Smith, ‘The spirit and democracy: Base communities, Protestantism, and democratization in Latin America’, Sociology of Religion, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 119–143, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3711853
[42]
E. J. Friedman and K. Hochstetler, ‘Assessing the third transition in Latin American democratization: Representational regimes and civil society in Argentina and Brazil’, Comparative Politics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 21–42, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4146926
[43]
Scott Mainwaring and Aníbal Pérez-Liñán, Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America: Emergence, Survival, and Fall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139047845
[44]
J. C. Torre and L. de Riz, ‘Argentina since 1946’, in The Cambridge History of Latin America, L. Bethell, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. 73–194 [Online]. Available: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/histories/CBO9781139055246A006
[45]
Carlos H. Waisman, ‘Argentina: Capitalism and democracy’, in Democracy in developing countries: Latin America, 2nd ed., Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999, pp. 71–130.
[46]
M. Cavarozzi, ‘Political cycles in Argentina since 1955’, in Transitions from authoritarian rule - Latin America, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986, pp. 19–48 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a62863ab-212d-ed11-bd6e-0050f2f06092
[47]
J. W. McGuire, ‘Political parties and democracy in Argentina’, in Building democratic institutions: party systems in Latin America, Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1995, pp. 200–246 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=16fc7b7e-6d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[48]
C. H. Waisman and M. Peralta-Ramos, From military rule to liberal democracy in Argentina, vol. Westview special studies on Latin America and the Caribbean. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1986.
[49]
E. C. Epstein, The new Argentine democracy: the search for a successful formula. Westport, Conn: Praeger, 1992.
[50]
J. S. Tulchin and A. M. Garland, Argentina: the challenges of modernization. Wilmington, Del: Scholarly Resources, 1998.
[51]
A. Brysk, The politics of human rights in Argentina: protest, change, and democratization. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1994.
[52]
Elizabeth Jelin, ‘The politics of memory: The human rights movements and the construction of democracy in Argentina’, Latin American Perspectives, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 38–58, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2633874
[53]
M. Navarro, ‘The personal is political: Las Madres de la Plaza de Mayo’, in Power and popular protest: Latin American social movements, Updated and Expanded ed., Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001, pp. 241–258 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520352148
[54]
Luis Roniger and Mario Sznajder, The legacy of human-rights violations in the Southern Cone: Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay, vol. Oxford studies in democratization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198296157.001.0001
[55]
G. L. Munck, Authoritarianism and democratization: soldiers and workers in Argentina, 1976-1983. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1998.
[56]
D. L. Norden, Military rebellion in Argentina: between coups and consolidation. Lincoln [Neb.]: University of Nebraska Press, 1996.
[57]
Deborah L. Norden, ‘Democratic consolidation and military professionalism: Argentina in the 1980s’, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 151–176, 1990 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/166091
[58]
David Pion-Berlin, ‘Between confrontation and accommodation: Military and government policy in democratic Argentina’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 23, no. 03, pp. 543–571, 2009, doi: 10.1017/S0022216X00015844. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-latin-american-studies/issue/8E7FBCE207947ADAE8F74A7519FF21E3
[59]
D. Pion-Berlin, Through corridors of power: institutions and civil-military relations in Argentina. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997.
[60]
J. W. McGuire, Peronism without Perón: unions, parties, and democracy in Argentina. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1997.
[61]
Georgina Waylen, ‘Gender and democratic politics: A comparative analysis of consolidation in Argentina and Chile’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 32, no. 03, pp. 765–793, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=59541
[62]
Tricia Gray, ‘Electoral gender quotas: Lessons from Argentina and Chile’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 52–78, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.1111/1470-9856.00064. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14709856/2003/22/1
[63]
C. M. Lewis and N. Torrents, Argentina in the crisis years (1983-1990): from Alfonsin to Menem. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, 1993.
[64]
Enrique Peruzzotti, ‘The nature of the new Argentine democracy. The delegative democracy argument revisited’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 133–155, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3653649
[65]
Carlos S. Nino, ‘Hyper-presidentialism and constitutional reform in Argentina’, in Institutional design in new democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin America, vol. Latin America in global perspective, Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1996, pp. 161–174 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9780429499784/institutional-design-new-democracies-arend-lijphart-carlos-waisman
[66]
Mark P. Jones, ‘Evaluating Argentina’s presidential democracy: 1983-1995’, in Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America, vol. Cambridge studies in comparative politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 259–299 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/presidentialism-and-democracy-in-latin-america/evaluating-argentinas-presidential-democracy-19831995/3B4AF850E6A29917359DEC5B66D5E17D
[67]
S. Levitsky, ‘Argentina: From crisis to consolidation (and back)’, in Constructing democratic governance in Latin America, Fourth edition., vol. An Inter-American Dialogue book, J. I. Domínguez and M. Shifter, Eds. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 2013.
[68]
S. Levitsky, ‘Argentina: Democratic survival amidst economic failure’, in The third wave of democratization in Latin America: advances and setbacks, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 63–89 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791116.003
[69]
A. Angell, ‘Chile since 1958’, in The Cambridge History of Latin America, L. Bethell, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. 311–382 [Online]. Available: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/histories/CBO9781139055246A011
[70]
V. Arturo, ‘Chile: Origins and consolidation of a Latin American democracy’, in Democracy in developing countries: Latin America, 2nd ed., Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999, pp. 120–247.
[71]
T. R. Scully, ‘Reconstituting party politics in Chile’, in Building democratic institutions: party systems in Latin America, Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1995, pp. 100–137.
[72]
F. Agüero, ‘Chile: unfinished transition and increased political competition’, in Constructing democratic governance in Latin America, 2nd ed., vol. An Inter-American Dialogue book, Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003, pp. 292-424-320–432 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=bc61da8d-6c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[73]
P. W. Drake and I. Jaksic, The struggle for democracy in Chile, 1982-1990, vol. Latin American studies series. Lincoln, Neb: University of Nebraska Press, 1991.
[74]
J. S. Valenzuela and A. Valenzuela, ‘Party oppositions under the Chilean authoritarian regime’, in Military rule in Chile: dictatorship and oppositions, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986, pp. 184–229 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=699ce81d-cf1e-ed11-bd6e-a04a5e5d2f8d
[75]
Brian Loveman, ‘Military dictatorship and political opposition in Chile, 1973-1986’, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1–38, 1986 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/165745
[76]
Brian Loveman, ‘Mision cumplida? Civil military relations and the Chilean political transition’, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 35–74, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/165933
[77]
Alan Angell and Benny Pollack, ‘The Chilean elections of 1989 and the politics of the transition to democracy’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 1990 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3338214
[78]
Alan Angell and Benny Pollack, ‘The Chilean presidential elections of 1999-2000 and democratic consolidation’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 357–378, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/3339299
[79]
James C. Cavendish, ‘Christian base communities and the building of democracy: Brazil and Chile’, Sociology of Religion, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 179–195, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3711856
[80]
Philip Oxhorn, ‘Understanding political change after authoritarian rule: The popular sectors and Chile’s new democratic regime’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 737–759, 2009, doi: 10.1017/S0022216X00008580. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-latin-american-studies/issue/0F0130D5A55FD6A5EA777BF7A0F00A99
[81]
Manuel Antonio Garreton Merino, ‘Redemocratization in Chile’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 146–158, 1995, doi: 10.1353/jod.1995.0009. [Online]. Available: https://muse.jhu.edu/issue/981
[82]
Mark Ensalaco, ‘In with the new, out with the old? The democratising impact of constitutional reform in Chile’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 409–429, 1994, doi: 10.1017/S0022216X00016278. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-latin-american-studies/issue/1CD1A0E686B626466E749662A3BC3C2D
[83]
Jonathan R. Barton and Warwick E. Murray, ‘The end of transition? Chile 1990-2000’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 329–338, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3339683
[84]
Alexander Wilde, ‘Irruptions of Memory: Expressive Politics in Chile’s Transition to Democracy’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 31, no. 02, pp. 473–500, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=16647&fulltextType=SC&fileId=S0022216X99005349
[85]
Georgina Waylen, ‘Gender and democratic politics: A comparative analysis of consolidation in Argentina and Chile’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 32, no. 03, pp. 765–793 [Online]. Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=59541&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0022216X00005939
[86]
Tricia Gray, ‘Electoral gender quotas: Lessons from Argentina and Chile’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 52–78, doi: 10.1111/1470-9856.00064. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14709856/2003/22/1
[87]
Alexandra Barahona de Brito, Human rights and democratization in Latin America: Uruguay and Chile, vol. Oxford studies in democratization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198280386.001.0001
[88]
Luis Roniger and Mario Sznajder, The legacy of human-rights violations in the Southern Cone: Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay, vol. Oxford studies in democratization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198296157.001.0001
[89]
J. Samuel Valenzuela and Timothy R. Scully, ‘Electoral choices and the party system in Chile: Continuities and changes at the recovery of democracy’, Comparative Politics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 511–527, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/422017
[90]
Peter Siavelis and Arturo Valenzuela, ‘Electoral engineering and democratic stability: The legacy of authoritarian rule in Chile.’, in Institutional design in new democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin America, vol. Latin America in global perspective, Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1996, pp. 77–99 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=896a4818-221e-ed11-bd6e-a04a5e5d2f8d
[91]
Rhoda Rabkin, ‘Redemocratization, electoral engineering, and party strategies in Chile, 1989-1995’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 335–356, doi: 10.1177/0010414096029003004. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cpsa/29/3
[92]
Arturo Valenzuela, ‘Party politics and the failure of presidentialism in Chile’, in The failure of presidential democracy: The Case of Latin America, vol. Vol. 2, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.
[93]
Paul W. Posner, ‘Popular Representation and Political Dissatisfaction in Chile’s New Democracy’, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. v-+ 59-85, Spring 1999, doi: 10.2307/166227. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-interamerican-studies-and-world-affairs/issue/52E85C3441EAFB0FC93A09449D313329
[94]
K. M. Roberts, Deepening democracy?: the modern left and social movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1998.
[95]
P. Vergara, ‘Market economy, social welfare and democratic consolidation in Chile’, in Democracy, markets, and structural reform in Latin America: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico, Miami, Fla: North-South Center Press, University of Miami, 1994, pp. 237–261 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=004562d2-6228-ed11-bd6e-0050f2f06092
[96]
Patrick S. Barrett, ‘The limits of democracy: Socio-political compromise and regime change in post-Pinochet Chile’, Studies in Comparative International Development, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 3–36, doi: 10.1007/BF02687625. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/journal/12116/volumes-and-issues/34-3
[97]
Peter M. Siavelis, ‘Electoral system, coalitional disintegration, and the future of Chile’s concertación’, Latin American Research Review, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 56–82, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1555365
[98]
Patricio Silva, ‘Doing politics in a depoliticised society: Social change and political deactivation in Chile’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 63–78, doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2004.00096.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14709856/2004/23/1
[99]
J. Samuel Valenzuela, Timothy R. Scully, and Nicolás Somma, ‘The enduring presence of religion in Chilean ideological positionings and voter options’, Comparative Politics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20434061
[100]
Alan Angell, ‘Democratic governance in Chile’, in Democratic governance in Latin America, Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 2010, pp. 269–306 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a7d3f261-d01e-ed11-bd6e-a04a5e5d2f8d
[101]
Juan Pablo Luna and David Altman, ‘Uprooted but Stable: Chilean Parties and the Concept of Party System Institutionalization’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 1–28, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2011.00115.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/C9D5E20E1843AA5A2AC713BF738E83A9
[102]
B. Lamounier, ‘Brazil: Inequality against democracy’, in Democracy in developing countries: Latin America, 2nd ed., Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999, pp. 131–189 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=09dd7698-221e-ed11-bd6e-a04a5e5d2f8d
[103]
T. Bruneau, ‘Brazil’s political transition’, in Elites and democratic consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 257–281 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173902.010
[104]
Frances Hagopian, ‘“Democracy by undemocratic means”?: Elites, political pacts, and regime transition in Brazil’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 147–170, doi: 10.1177/0010414090023002001. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cpsa/23/2
[105]
S. Mainwaring, ‘Brazil: Weak parties, feckless democracy’, in Building democratic institutions: party systems in Latin America, Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1995, pp. 354–398.
[106]
Bolívar Lamounier, ‘Brazil: An Assessment of the Cardoso Administration’, in Constructing democratic governance in Latin America, Fourth edition., vol. An Inter-American Dialogue book, Jorge I. Domínguez and Michael Shifter, Eds. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 2013, pp. 269–291.
[107]
P. R. Kingstone and T. J. Power, Democratic Brazil: actors, institutions, and processes, vol. Pitt Latin American series. Pittsburgh, Pa: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000.
[108]
T. E. Skidmore, The politics of military rule in Brazil, 1964-85. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
[109]
W. Hunter, Eroding military influence in Brazil: politicians against soldiers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997.
[110]
S. Mainwaring, Rethinking party systems in the third wave of democratization: the case of Brazil. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1999.
[111]
A. C. Stepan, Democratizing Brazil: problems of transition and consolidation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
[112]
Scott Mainwaring, ‘Politicians, parties, and electoral systems: Brazil in comparative perspective’, Comparative Politics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 21–43, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/422200
[113]
B. Lamounier, ‘Presidentialism and parliamentarism in Brazil’, in Parliamentary versus presidential government, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992, pp. 133–136 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7c211100-0b1e-ed11-bd6e-a04a5e5d2f8d
[114]
J. Martínez-Lara and St. Antony’s College (University of Oxford), Building democracy in Brazil: the politics of constitutional change, 1985-95, vol. St. Antony’s series. Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with St. Antony’s College, 1996.
[115]
Barry Ames, The deadlock of democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780472021437/
[116]
F. Hagopian, Traditional politics and regime change in Brazil, vol. Cambridge studies in comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[117]
J. Martínez-Lara and St. Antony’s College (University of Oxford), Building democracy in Brazil: the politics of constitutional change, 1985-95, vol. St. Antony’s series. Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with St. Antony’s College, 1996.
[118]
M. E. Keck, The Workers’ Party and democratization in Brazil. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.
[119]
E. Sader and K. Silverstein, Without fear of being happy: Lula, the Workers Party and Brazil. London: Verso, 1991.
[120]
L. A. Payne, Brazilian industrialists and democratic change. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.
[121]
T. J. Power, The political right in postauthoritarian Brazil: elites, institutions, and democratization. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2000.
[122]
C. M. de Souza, Constitutional engineering in Brazil: the politics of federalism and decentralization. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1997.
[123]
S. E. Alvarez, Engendering democracy in Brazil: women’s movements in transition politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1990.
[124]
James C. Cavendish, ‘Christian base communities and the building of democracy: Brazil and Chile’, Sociology of Religion, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 179–195, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3711856
[125]
S. K. Purcell and R. Roett, Brazil under Cardoso. Boulder, Colo: L. Rienner Publishers, 1997.
[126]
Kurt Weyland, ‘Obstacles to social reform in Brazil’s new democracy’, Comparative Politics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/422180
[127]
Kurt Weyland, ‘The Brazilian state in the new democracy’, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 63–94, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/166424
[128]
S. Mainwaring, ‘Urban popular movements, identity, and democratization in Brazil’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 131–159, doi: 10.1177/0010414087020002001. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cpsa/20/2
[129]
M. D. G. Kinzo and University of London, Brazil, the challenges of the 1990s. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London, 1993.
[130]
‘Journal of interamerican studies and world affairs’, vol. 40, no. 4 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/i208876
[131]
Ron Ahnen, ‘Between tyranny of the majority and liberty: The persistence of human rights violations under democracy in Brazil’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 319–339, doi: 10.1111/1470-9856.00080. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14709856/2003/22/3
[132]
Kees Koonings, ‘Strengthening citizenship in Brazil’s democracy: Local participatory governance in Porto Alegre’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 79–99, doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2004.00097.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14709856/2004/23/1
[133]
Kurt Wayland, ‘The growing sustainability of Brazil’s low-quality democracy’, in The third wave of democratization in Latin America: advances and setbacks, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 120–190 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791116
[134]
Brian, Wampler, ‘Participatory publics: Civil society and new institutions in democratic Brazil’, Comparative Politics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 291–312, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/4150132
[135]
Ronald E. Ahnen, ‘The politics of police violence in democratic Brazil’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 141–164, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/4490510
[136]
Brian Wampler, ‘When does participatory democracy deepen the quality of democracy? Lessons from Brazil’, Comparative Politics, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 61–81, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/20434105
[137]
Alfredo Alejandro Gugliano and Carlos Artur Gallo, ‘On the Ruins of the Democratic Transition: Human Rights as an Agenda Item in Abeyance for the Brazilian Democracy’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 325–338, 2013, doi: 10.1111/blar.12034. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14709856/2013/32/3
[138]
B. Lamounier, ‘Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America’, in Constructing democratic governance in Latin America, Fourth edition., vol. An Inter-American Dialogue book, J. I. Domínguez and M. Shifter, Eds. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 2013.
[139]
P. R. Kingstone and T. J. Power, Democratic Brazil: actors, institutions, and processes, vol. Pitt Latin American series. Pittsburgh, Pa: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000.
[140]
J. Ewell, ‘Venezuela since 1930’, in The Cambridge History of Latin America, L. Bethell, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. 727–790 [Online]. Available: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/histories/CBO9781139055246A020
[141]
D. H. Levine, ‘Venezuela since 1958: The consolidation of democratic politics’, in The breakdown of democratic regimes, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978, pp. 82–109 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ce6c7a11-392d-ed11-bd6e-0050f2f06092
[142]
J. A. Peeler, ‘Elite settlements and democratic consolidation: Colombia, Costa Rica, and Venezuela’, in Elites and Democratic consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 81–112 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173902
[143]
Bryan T. Froehle, ‘Religious competition, community building, and democracy in Latin America: Grassroots religious organizations in Venezuela’, Sociology of Religion, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 145–162, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/3711854
[144]
D. H. Levine and B. F. Crisp, ‘Venezuela: The character, crisis, and possible future of democracy.’, in Democracy in developing countries: Latin America, 2nd ed., Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999, pp. 367–428 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=48cbc81a-7d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[145]
D. H. Levine, Conflict and political change in Venezuela. 1973.
[146]
J. D. Martz and D. J. Myers, Venezuela: the democratic experience, Rev. ed. New York: Praeger, 1986.
[147]
Kevin Neuhouser, ‘Democratic stability in Venezuela: Elite consensus or class compromise?’, American Sociological Review, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 117–135, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/2096148
[148]
Daniel H. Levine, ‘The transition to democracy: are there lessons from Venezuela?’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 47–61, 1985 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/3338315
[149]
Terry Lynn Karl, ‘Petroleum and political pacts: The transition to democracy in Venezuela’, Latin American Research Review, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 63–94, 1987 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/2503543
[150]
M. Kornblith and D. H. Levine, ‘Venezuela: The life and times of the party system’, in Building democratic institutions: party systems in Latin America, Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1995, pp. 37–71.
[151]
M. J. Coppedge, Strong parties and lame ducks: a study of the quality and stability of Venezuelan democracy. Ann Arbor, Mich: UMI, 1992.
[152]
John D. Martz, ‘Party elites and leadership in Colombia and Venezuela’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 87–121, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/156673
[153]
L. W. Goodman, Lessons of the Venezuelan experience. Washington, D.C: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1994.
[154]
H. A. Trinkunas, Crafting civilian control of the military in Venezuela: a comparative perspective. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9781469603643/
[155]
Ricardo Córdova Macías, ‘El Salvador: transition from civil war.’, in Constructing democratic governance: Latin America and the Caribbean in the 1990s : themes and issues, vol. An Inter-American Dialogue book, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996, pp. 26–49.
[156]
J. S. Tulchin and G. Bland, Is there a transition to democracy in El Salvador?, vol. Woodrow Wilson Center current studies on Latin America. Boulder: L. Rienner Publishers, 1992.
[157]
Elisabeth J. Wood, ‘Civil war and the transformation of elite representation in El Salvador’, in Conservative parties, the right, and democracy in Latin America, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000, pp. 223–254 [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=75734&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_223
[158]
Knut Walter and Philip J. Williams, ‘The military and democratization in El Salvador’, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 39–88, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/166102
[159]
Charles T. Call, ‘Democratisation, war and state-building: Constructing the rule of law in El Salvador’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 827–862, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/3875834
[160]
Charles T. Call, ‘War transitions and the new civilian security in Latin America’, Comparative Politics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/4146925
[161]
J. Michael Dodson and Donald W. Jackson, ‘Re‐inventing the rule of law: Human rights in El Salvador’, Democratization, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 110–134, doi: 10.1080/13510349708403538. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/fdem20/4/4
[162]
P. Weiss Fagen, ‘El Salvador: Lessons in peace consolidation’, in Beyond sovereignty: collectively defending democracy in the Americas, vol. An Inter-American Dialogue book, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996, pp. 213–237 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4bb15f56-231e-ed11-bd6e-a04a5e5d2f8d
[163]
Enrique A. Baloyra-Herp, ‘Elections, civil war, and transition in El Salvador, 1982-1994’, in Elections and democracy in Central America, revisited, New&enl. Ed., Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995, pp. 45–65 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1a2bf9f1-cf1e-ed11-bd6e-a04a5e5d2f8d
[164]
E. J. Wood, ‘Challenges to political democracy in El Salvador’, in The third wave of democratization in Latin America: advances and setbacks, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 79–201 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/third-wave-of-democratization-in-latin-america/challenges-to-political-democracy-in-el-salvador/18FB61E171CFA0D304BAA89E966F2B88
[165]
Rachel Sieder, ‘War, peace, and memory politics in Central America’, in The politics of memory: transitional justice in democratizing societies, vol. Oxford studies in democratization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 161–189 [Online]. Available: https://academic.oup.com/book/27029/chapter/196301676
[166]
Angelika Rettberg, ‘The private sector and peace in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Colombia’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 463–494, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40056541
[167]
Dinorah Azpuru, ‘The Salience of Ideology: Fifteen Years of Presidential Elections in El Salvador’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 103–138, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2010.00083.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/396E17C3C77246FB3CB3702525E8C602
[168]
Sonja Wolf, ‘Subverting Democracy: Elite Rule and the Limits of Political Participation in Post-War El Salvador’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 429–465, doi: 10.1017/S0022216X09990149. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-latin-american-studies/issue/EB85296E3995CC66122DF7EC0066A410
[169]
Alisha C. Holland, ‘Insurgent Successor Parties: Scaling Down to Build a Party after War’, in Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America, Steven Levitsky, James Loxton, Brandon Van Dyck, and Jorge I Dominguez, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 245–272 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/challenges-of-partybuilding-in-latin-america/insurgent-successor-parties/AA98AF3E8364B63135B44DA6201921F6
[170]
J. A. Booth, The end and the beginning: the Nicaraguan Revolution, vol. Westview special studies on Latin America and the Caribbean. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1982.
[171]
Philip J. Williams, ‘Dual transitions from authoritarian rule: Popular and electoral democracy in Nicaragua’, Comparative Politics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 169–185, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/422266
[172]
R. J. Spalding, ‘Nicaragua: Politics, poverty and polarization’, in Constructing democratic governance: Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean in the 1990s, vol. An Inter-American Dialogue book, J. I. Domínguez and A. F. Lowenthal, Eds. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996, pp. 3-25-199–206 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6ac1ac73-6c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[173]
C. Arnson, J. S. Tulchin, and Woodrow Wilson International Center For Scholars. Latin American Program, ‘Nicaragua’s search for democratic consensus’, no. Issue 213 of Working papers, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Latin American Program. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 1995 [Online]. Available: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/
[174]
L. Anderson, ‘Elections and public opinion in the development of Nicaraguan democracy’, in Elections and democracy in Central America, revisited, New&enl. Ed., Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995, pp. 84–102.
[175]
D. Gilbert, Sandinistas: the party and the revolution. Cambridge, Mass., USA: B. Blackwell, 1990.
[176]
L. Anderson and L. C. Dodd, Learning democracy: citizen engagement and electoral choice in Nicaragua, 1990-2001. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
[177]
Magda Hinojosa and Ana Vijil Gurdián, ‘Alternative Paths to Power? Women’s Political Representation in Nicaragua’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 61–88, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2012.00173.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/9A7579F13B061ADCD68BA5FB546F7C0A
[178]
Forrest D. Colburn and Arturo S. Cruz, ‘Personalism and Populism in Nicaragua’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 104–118 [Online]. Available: http://www.journalofdemocracy.org/article/personalism-and-populism-nicaragua
[179]
Salvador Martí i Puig, ‘The Adaptation of the FSLN: Daniel Ortega’s Leadership and Democracy in Nicaragua’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 79–106, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2010.00099.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/B29056916F741D8E2B61292ECF0D9530
[180]
Lynn R. Horton, ‘From Collectivism to Capitalism: Neoliberalism and Rural Mobilization in Nicaragua’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 119–140, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2013.00186.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/1DD0A4BCF4B7F1B3297BF6A236D93804
[181]
K. J. Middlebrook, ‘Mexico’s democratic transitions: Dynamics and prospects’, in Dilemmas of political change in Mexico, London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London, 2004, pp. 1–53 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3568cd93-8f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[182]
Kenneth F. Greene and Mariano Sánchez-Talanquer, ‘Authoritarian Legacies and Party System Stability in Mexico’, in Party Systems in Latin America, S. Mainwaring, Ed. Cambridge University Press, 2018, pp. 201–226 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/party-systems-in-latin-america/A62FA6AE29245CAB328B2AEB45DD4D1A
[183]
Laurence Whitehead, ‘Prospects for a “transition” from authoritarian rule in Mexico’, in The politics of economic restructuring: state-society relations and regime change in Mexico, vol. U.S.-Mexico contemporary perspectives series, Maria Lorena Cook, Kevin J. Middlebrook, and Juan Molinar Horcasitas, Eds. San Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego, 1994, pp. 327–346.
[184]
Ilán Bizberg, ‘Transition or restructuring of society?’, in Mexico’s politics and society in transition, Boulder, Colo: L. Rienner, 2003, pp. 143–175 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=83c4157a-4c28-ed11-bd6e-0050f2f06092
[185]
Darren Wallis, ‘The Mexican presidential and congressional elections of 2000 and democratic transition’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 304–323, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3339731
[186]
Maria L. Cook, Kevin J. Middlebrook, and Juan Molinar Horcasitas, ‘The politics of economic restructuring in Mexico: actors, sequencing, and coalition change’, in The politics of economic restructuring: state-society relations and regime change in Mexico, vol. U.S.-Mexico contemporary perspectives series, [San Diego]: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego, 1994, pp. 3–52.
[187]
Roderic Ai Camp, ‘The cross in the polling booth: religion, politics, and the laity in Mexico’, Latin American Research Review, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 69–100, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2503943
[188]
K. Bruhn, Taking on Goliath: the emergence of a new left party and the struggle for democracy in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997.
[189]
K. J. Middlebrook, Party politics and the struggle for democracy in Mexico: national and state-level analyses of the Partido Acción Nacional, vol. U.S.-Mexico contemporary perspectives series. San Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, 2001.
[190]
C. H. Lawson, Building the fourth estate: democratization and the rise of a free press in Mexico. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2002.
[191]
P. Haber, Power from experience: urban popular movements in late twentieth-century Mexico. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2006.
[192]
J. I. Domínguez and J. A. McCann, Democratizing Mexico: public opinion and electoral choices. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
[193]
Review by: Joseph L. Klesner, ‘An electoral route to democracy? Mexico’s transition in comparative perspective’, Comparative Politics, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 477–497, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/422335
[194]
James A. McCann, ‘An electorate adrift? Public opinion and the quality of democracy in Mexico’, Latin American Research Review, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 60–81, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1555450
[195]
Joseph L. Klesner, ‘Who participates? Determinants of political action in Mexico’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 59–90, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20622726
[196]
J. I. Domínguez, A. Poiré, and Conference on Mexican Democratization, Toward Mexico’s democratization: parties, campaigns, elections, and public opinion. New York: Routledge, 1999.
[197]
M. Serrano and University of London, Governing Mexico: political parties and elections. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, 1998.
[198]
Judith Teichman, ‘Neoliberalism and the transformation of Mexican authoritarianism’, Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 121–147, doi: 10.2307/1051868. [Online]. Available: https://online.ucpress.edu/msem/issue/13/1
[199]
J. I. Domínguez and C. H. Lawson, Mexico’s pivotal democratic election: candidates, voters, and the presidential campaign of 2000. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 2004.
[200]
A. Covarrubias, ‘El ámbito internacional y el proceso de cambio político en México’, in Caminos a la democracia, 1 ed., México, D.F.: Centro de Estudios Internacionales, Colegio de México, 2001.
[201]
D. Dresser, ‘Treading lightly and without a stick: International actors and the promotion of democracy in Mexico’, in Beyond sovereignty: collectively defending democracy in the Americas, vol. An Inter-American Dialogue book, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996, pp. 316–342.
[202]
Jorge I. Dominguez and Chappell Lawson, Eds., Consolidating Mexico’s democracy : the 2006 presidential campaign in comparative perspective. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 2009.
[203]
Jonathan T. Hiskey and Gary L. Goodman, ‘The Participation Paradox of Indigenous Autonomy in Mexico’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 61–86, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2011.00117.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/C9D5E20E1843AA5A2AC713BF738E83A9
[204]
D. Xavier Medina Vidal, Antonio Ugues Jr., Shaun Bowler, and Jonathan Hiskey, ‘Partisan Attachment and Democracy in Mexico: Some Cautionary Observations’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 63–87, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2010.00074.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/E416F6A7E7CEC326E92730DFC2CDF6F8
[205]
Tina Hilgers, ‘Causes and Consequences of Political Clientelism: Mexico’s PRD in Comparative Perspective’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 123–153, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2008.00032.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/FB6B42355B7DA088EC1E262034FA3AC2
[206]
Claudio A. Holzner, ‘The Poverty of Democracy: Neoliberal Reforms and Political Participation of the Poor in Mexico’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 87–122, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2007.tb00408.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/7EF18403513014BE4F87A387EF76A57E
[207]
Claudio A. Holzner, ‘Authoritarian Legacies and Democratic Consolidation in Mexico’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 143–159, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2009.00059.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/B132A9A3394F27B820682F901E24CC5F
[208]
Kenneth F. Greene, ‘The Niche Party: Authoritarian Regime Legacies and Party-Building in New Democracies’, in Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America, S. Levitsky, J. Loxton, B. Van Dyck, and J. I. Dominguez, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 133–158 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781316550564
[209]
Julio Ríos-Figueroa, ‘Fragmentation of Power and the Emergence of an Effective Judiciary in Mexico’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 31–57, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2007.tb00373.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/58139B5E75A41B7454F1C67A5E4D9A57
[210]
Roderic Ai Camp, ‘The 2012 Presidential Election and What It Reveals about Mexican Voters’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 451–481, doi: 10.1017/S0022216X1300076X. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-latin-american-studies/issue/3D1297774E101DA14F5FFF003F167417
[211]
Sonja Wolf, ‘Drugs, Violence, and Corruption: Perspectives from Mexico and Central America’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 146–155, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2016.00298.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/EE92F54B0628787829D2A9CBD8D5177D
[212]
G. O’Donnell and P. C. Schmitter, ‘Convoking elections (and provoking parties)’, in Transitions from authoritarian rule: Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013, pp. 66–74 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0e68d9bc-738d-ec11-a507-a04a5e5d2f8d
[213]
S. Mainwaring and T. R. Scully, ‘Introduction: party systems in Latin America’, in Building democratic institutions: party systems in Latin America, Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1995, pp. 1–36.
[214]
Scott Mainwaring, Fernando Bizzarro, and Ana Petrova, ‘Party System Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse’, in Party Systems in Latin America, Scott Mainwaring, Ed. Cambridge University Press, 2018, pp. 17–33 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/party-systems-in-latin-america/A62FA6AE29245CAB328B2AEB45DD4D1A
[215]
Scott Mainwaring, ‘Party System Institutionalization, Predictability, and Democracy’, in Party Systems in Latin America, S. Mainwaring, Ed. Cambridge University Press, 2018, pp. 71–101 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/party-systems-in-latin-america/party-system-institutionalization-predictability-and-democracy/E5D3C5B41BC3DD03A15B57D0DDE8DCF4
[216]
Steven Levitsky, James Loxton, and Brandon Van Dyck, ‘Introduction: Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America’, in Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America, S. Levitsky, J. Loxton, B. Van Dyck, and J. I. Dominguez, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 1–48 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781316550564
[217]
Herbert Kitschelt, Kirk A. Hawkins, Juan Pablo Luna, Guillermo Rosas, and Elizabeth J. Zechmeister, Latin American Party Systems, vol. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750311
[218]
G. O’Donnell, ‘Delegative democracy’, in Counterpoints: selected essays on authoritarianism and democratization, Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press, 1999.
[219]
G. Helmke and S. Levitsky, Informal institutions and democracy: lessons from Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006.
[220]
César Cansino, ‘Party government in Latin America: Theoretical guidelines for an empirical analysis’, International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 169–182, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/1601457
[221]
Robert H. Dix, ‘Democratization and the institutionalization of Latin American political parties’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 488–511, doi: 10.1177/0010414092024004004. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cpsa/24/4
[222]
Robert H. Dix, ‘Cleavage structures and party systems in Latin America’, Comparative Politics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 23–37, 1989 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/422320
[223]
J. I. Dominguez, Ed., Parties, elections, and political participation in Latin America. New York: Garland Pub., 1994.
[224]
R. H. McDonald and J. M. Ruhl, Party politics and elections in Latin America. Boulder: Westview Press, 1989.
[225]
L. Wills-Otero, ‘Electoral systems in Latin America: Explaining the adoption of proportional representation systems during the Twentieth century’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 33–58, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/20622740
[226]
Karen L. Remmer, ‘The political economy of elections in Latin America, 1980-1991’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 393–407, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/2939049
[227]
P. W. Drake, E. Silva, K. J. Middlebrook, and University of California, Elections and democratization in Latin America, 1980-1985. San Diego, Calif: Center for Iberian and Latin American Studies, University of California, 1986.
[228]
H. A. Dietz and G. Shidlo, Urban elections in democratic Latin America, vol. Latin American silhouettes. Wilmington, Del: Scholarly Resources, 1998.
[229]
A. Lijphart and C. H. Waisman, Institutional design in new democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin America. [Place of publication not identified]: Routledge, 2018 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780429499784
[230]
Mark P. Jones, ‘Presidential election laws and multipartism in Latin America’, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 41–57, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/448901
[231]
Mark P. Jones, ‘A guide to the electoral systems of the Americas’, Electoral studies, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 5–21 [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/026137949400021Z
[232]
Kevin J Middlebrook, ‘Introduction: Conservative parties, elite representation, and democracy in Latin America’, in Conservative parties, the right, and democracy in Latin America, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000, pp. 1–52 [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=75734&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_1
[233]
E. L. Gibson, Class and conservative parties: Argentina in comparative perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
[234]
S. Mainwaring and T. Scully, Christian democracy in Latin America: electoral competition and regime conflicts. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 2003.
[235]
Alan Angell, ‘The Left in Latin America since c. 1920’, in The Cambridge History of Latin America, Leslie Bethell, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 163–232 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-latin-america/left-in-latin-america-since-c-1920/D9EB4BFAE5637CAF27553D034DB00A0E
[236]
S. Mainwaring, Rethinking party systems in the third wave of democratization: the case of Brazil. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1999.
[237]
Scott Mainwaring, ‘Political parties and democratization in Brazil and the Southern Cone’, Comparative Politics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 91–120, 1988 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/422073
[238]
M. Cavarozzi and M. A. Garreton Merino, Muerte y resurrección: los partidos políticos en el autoritarismo y las transiciones del Cono Sur, vol. Serie Libros FLACSO-Chile. [Santiago, Chile]: Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, 1989.
[239]
M. A. Seligson and J. A. Booth, Elections and democracy in Central America, revisited, New&enl. Ed. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995.
[240]
Michael Coppedge, ‘Parties and society in Mexico and Venezuela: Why competition matters’, Comparative Politics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 253–274, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/422245
[241]
Leiv Marsteintredet, ‘Reducing the perils of presidentialism in Latin America through presidential interruptions’, Comparative Politics, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 83–101, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/20434106
[242]
Javier Corrales, ‘Can Anyone Stop the President? Power Asymmetries and Term Limits in Latin America, 1984-2016’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 3–25, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2016.00308.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/41DC4970DD2E41219CF04C909A11FA79
[243]
B. Goldfrank, ‘The politics of deepening local democracy: Decentralization, party institutionalization, and participation’, Comparative Politics, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 147–168, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/20434031
[244]
Brian Wampler, ‘When does participatory democracy deepen the quality of democracy? Lessons from Brazil’, Comparative Politics, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 61–81, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/20434105
[245]
J. McCoy, Political learning and redemocratization in Latin America: do politicians learn from political crises? Coral Gables, FL: North-South Center Press, University of Miami, 1999.
[246]
S. Mainwaring, G. A. O’Donnell, and J. S. Valenzuela, Issues in democratic consolidation: the new South American democracies in comparative perspective. Notre Dame, Ind: Published for the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies by University of Notre Dame Press, 1992.
[247]
Anita Breuer, ‘The problematic relation between direct democracy and accountability in Latin America: Evidence from the Bolivian case’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–23, doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2007.00254.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14709856/2008/27/1
[248]
John Crabtree, ‘Democracy without parties? Some lessons from Peru’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 42, no. 02, pp. 357–382, doi: 10.1017/S0022216X10000477. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-latin-american-studies/issue/3534E9D8696191781BDA6D1CC4489438
[249]
Tricia Gray, ‘Electoral gender quotas: Lessons from Argentina and Chile’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 52–78, doi: 10.1111/1470-9856.00064. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14709856/2003/22/1
[250]
Luis F. Miguel, ‘Political representation and gender in Brazil: Quotas for women and their impact’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 197–214, doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2008.00263.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14709856/2008/27/2
[251]
M. Htun, Inclusion without Representation in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139021067
[252]
Jóhanna Kristín Birnir and Donna Lee Van Cott, ‘Disunity in diversity: Party system fragmentation and the dynamic effect of ethnic heterogeneity on Latin American legislatures’, Latin American Research Review, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 99–125, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4499355
[253]
Carlos Pereira and Marcus Andre Melo, ‘The Surprising Success of Multiparty Presidentialism’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 156–170 [Online]. Available: http://www.journalofdemocracy.org/article/surprising-success-multiparty-presidentialism
[254]
Daniel Altschuler and Javier Corrales, ‘The Spillover Effects of Participatory Governance: Evidence from Community-Managed Schools in Honduras and Guatemala’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 636–666, 2012, doi: 10.1177/0010414011427133. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cpsa/46/5
[255]
Angélica Durán-Martínez, ‘Presidents, Parties, and Referenda in Latin America’, Comparative political studies, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1159–1187, doi: 10.1177/0010414011434010. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cpsa/45/9
[256]
Fabrice Lehoucj and Aníbal Pérez-Líñan, ‘Breaking Out of the Coup Trap: Competition and Military Coups in Latin America’, Comparative political studies, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1105–1129, doi: 10.1177/0010414013488561. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cpsa/47/8
[257]
Kenneth M. Roberts, ‘Market Reform, Programmatic (De)alignment, and Party System Stability in Latin America’, Comparative political studies, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1422–1452, doi: 10.1177/0010414012453449. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cpsa/46/11
[258]
Kenneth M. Roberts, Changing Course in Latin America: Party systems in the neoliberal era. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511842856
[259]
S. G. Tarrow, Power in movement: social movements and contentious politics, Rev. & Updated 3rd ed., vol. Cambridge studies in comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781139010856
[260]
Marysa Navarro, ‘The Personal Is Political: Las Madres de Plaza de Mayo’, in Power and popular protest: Latin American social movements, Updated and Expanded ed., Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001, pp. 241–258 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520352148
[261]
P. Oxhorn, Organizing civil society: the popular sectors and the struggle for democracy in Chile. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.
[262]
Jonathan Fox, ‘The difficult transition from clientelism to citizenship: Lessons from Mexico’, in The new politics of inequality in Latin America: rethinking participation and representation, vol. Oxford studies in democratization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997, pp. 391–420 [Online]. Available: https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198781830.001.0001/acprof-9780198781837-chapter-16
[263]
Jonathan Fox, ‘How does civil society “thicken”? the political construction of social capital in rural Mexico’, World development, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1089–1103, doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(96)00025-3. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/world-development/vol/24/issue/6
[264]
Daniel H. Levine and Scott Mainwaring, ‘Religion and Popular Protest in Latin America: Contrasting Experiences’, in Power and popular protest: Latin American social movements, Updated and Expanded ed., Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001, pp. 203–240 [Online]. Available: https://www-degruyter-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/document/doi/10.1525/9780520352148/html
[265]
D. H. Levine, Popular voices in Latin American Catholicism, vol. Studies in church and state. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1992.
[266]
Steven Levitsky, ‘Organized labor and democracy in Latin America’, Comparative Politics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 21–42, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/20434019
[267]
Paul G. Buchanan, ‘Preauthoritarian Institutions and Postauthoritarian Outcomes: Labor Politics in Chile and Uruguay’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 59–89, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2008.00004.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/31A6A0477B778508F3537DEDCF90C050
[268]
A. Escobar and S. E. Alvarez, The Making of social movements in Latin America: identity, strategy, and democracy, vol. Series in political economy and economic development in Latin America. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1992.
[269]
H. Johnston and P. Almeida, Latin American social movements: globalization, democratization, and transnational networks. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.
[270]
Joseph L. Klesner, ‘Social Capital and Political Participation in Latin America: Evidence from Argentina, Chile, Mexico, and Peru’, Latin American Research Review, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 1–32, 2007, doi: 10.1353/lar.2007.0022. [Online]. Available: https://muse.jhu.edu/issue/11694
[271]
Benjamin Goldfrank, ‘The politics of deepening local democracy: Decentralization, party institutionalization, and participation’, Comparative Politics, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 147–168, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/20434031
[272]
Brian Wampler, ‘When does participatory democracy deepen the quality of democracy? Lessons from Brazil’, Comparative Politics, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 61–81, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/20434105
[273]
K. Hochstetler, ‘Can civil society organizations solve the crisis of partisan representation in Latin America?’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 1–32, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/30130855
[274]
E. Jelin and E. Hershberg, Construir la democracia, derechos humanos, ciudadanía y sociedad en América Latina, 1. ed. Venezuela: Editorial Nueva Sociedad, 1996.
[275]
Lynn R. Horton, ‘After democracy: Advances and challenges for women’s movements in Latin America’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 165–176, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/4490511
[276]
Georgina Waylen, ‘Gender and democratic politics: A comparative analysis of consolidation in Argentina and Chile’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 765–793, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/158617
[277]
Lisa Baldez, ‘Women’s movements and democratic transition in Chile, Brazil, East Germany, and Poland’, Comparative Politics, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 253–272, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/4150176
[278]
L. Horton, ‘After Democracy: Advances and Challenges for Women’s Movements in Latin America’, Latin American Politics & Society, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 165–176, 2007, doi: 10.1353/lap.2007.0004.
[279]
S. Franceschet and J. M. Piscopo, ‘Gender Quotas and Women’s Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina’, Politics & Gender, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 393–425 [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/docview/194669593?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511
[280]
Denise M. Walsh, ‘Does the Quality of Democracy Matter for Women’s Rights? Just Debate and Democratic Transition in Chile and South Africa’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1323–1350, 2012, doi: 10.1177/0010414012437165. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cpsa/45/11
[281]
L. A. Schwindt-Bayer, Political power and women’s representation in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[282]
Jana Morgan and Melissa Buice, ‘Latin American Attitudes toward Women in Politics: The Influence of Elite Cues, Female Advancement, and Individual Characteristics’, American Political Science Review, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 644–662, doi: 10.1017/S0003055413000385. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/issue/901473A29FF4E46F92D5CA594E16E6CB
[283]
M. Htun, Inclusion without Representation in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139021067
[284]
Susan, Franceschet, Jennifer M.Piscopo, and Gwynn Thomas, ‘Supermadres, Maternal Legacies and Women’s Political Participation in Contemporary Latin America’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 48, no. 01, pp. 1–32, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1017/S0022216X15000814. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-latin-american-studies/issue/9AE34C14466969585C0FAF75F932518B
[285]
Jennifer M. Piscopo, ‘When Informality Advantages Women: Quota Networks, Electoral Rules and Candidate Selection in Mexico’, Government and Opposition, vol. 51, no. 03, pp. 487–512, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1017/gov.2016.11. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/government-and-opposition/issue/7780F41BDDBC2970892C82D2339BA379
[286]
Caroline C. Beer and Roderic Ai Camp, ‘Democracy, gender quotas, and political recruitment in Mexico’, Politics, Groups, and Identities, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 179–195, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1080/21565503.2015.1120223. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rpgi20/4/2
[287]
Ron Ahnen, ‘Between tyranny of the majority and liberty: The persistence of human rights violations under democracy in Brazil’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 319–339, Jul. 2003, doi: 10.1111/1470-9856.00080. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14709856/2003/22/3
[288]
R. Sieder, Multiculturalism in Latin America: indigenous rights, diversity, and democracy, vol. Institute of Latin American Studies series. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002.
[289]
Deborah J. Yashar, ‘Contesting citizenship: Indigenous movements and democracy in Latin America’, Comparative Politics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 23–42, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/422104
[290]
Deborah J. Yashar, ‘Democracy, Indigenous Movements, and the Postliberal Challenge in Latin America’, World Politics, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 76–104 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054101
[291]
D. J. Yashar, Contesting citizenship in Latin America: the rise of indigenous movements and the postliberal challenge, vol. Cambridge studies in contentious politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://search.alexanderstreet.com/view/work/bibliographic_entity%7Cbibliographic_details%7C3883622?account_id=14511&usage_group_id=1418191
[292]
Donna Lee Van Cott, ‘Institutional Change and Ethnic Parties in South America’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 1–39, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2003.tb00239.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/A277A85806DA6A9495D995C97C0D7447
[293]
Donna Lee Van Cott, From Movements to Parties in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511756115
[294]
Donna Lee Van Cott, Radical Democracy in the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790560
[295]
L. Zamosc and N. G. Postero, The struggle for indigenous rights in Latin America. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, 2004.
[296]
Leon Zamosc, ‘The Indian movement and political democracy in Ecuador’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 1–34, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/30130809
[297]
Raúl L. Madrid, ‘The Rise of Ethnopopulism in Latin America’, World Politics, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 475–508, doi: 10.1017/S0043887100009060. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/world-politics/issue/C817EB3D26EE670BB00072B6E924C61F
[298]
Raúl Madrid, ‘Ethnic Cleavages and Electoral Volatility in Latin America’, Comparative Politics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–20, doi: 10.2307/20072910. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i20072908
[299]
Roberta Rice and Donna Lee Van Cott, ‘The Emergence and Performance of Indigenous Peoples’ Parties in South America: A Subnational Statistical Analysis’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 709–732, Aug. 2006, doi: 10.1177/0010414005285036. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cpsa/39/6
[300]
Raúl L. Madrid, The rise of ethnic politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022590
[301]
Raúl L. Madrid, ‘Obstacles to ethnic parties in Latin America’, in Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America, Steven Levitsky, James Loxton, Brandon Van Dyck, and Jorge I Dominguez, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 305–304 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781316550564
[302]
M. E. Andersen, Peoples of the Earth: ethnonationalism, democracy, and the indigenous challenge in ‘Latin’ America. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2010.
[303]
Robert Albro, ‘The Indigenous in the Plural in Bolivian Oppositional Politics’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 433–453, doi: 10.1111/j.0261-3050.2005.00142.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14709856/2005/24/4
[304]
Willem Assies and Ton Salman, ‘Ethnicity and politics in Bolivia’, Ethnopolitics, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 269–297, doi: 10.1080/17449050500229842. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/reno20/4/3
[305]
Igidio Naveda Felix, ‘The Reconstitution of Indigenous Peoples in the Peruvian Andes’, Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 309–317, doi: 10.1080/17442220802462469. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rlac20/3/3
[306]
R. Rice, The new politics of protest: indigenous mobilization in Latin America’s neoliberal era. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 2012.
[307]
Kevin Pallister, ‘Why No Mayan Party? Indigenous Movements and National Politics in Guatemala’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 117–138, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2013.00205.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/48CA3D50ED50FA917CEBCAFDA020301F
[308]
Guillermo Trejo, ‘Religious Competition and Ethnic Mobilization in Latin America: Why the Catholic Church Promotes Indigenous Movements in Mexico’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 323–342, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27798509?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[309]
G. Trejo, Popular Movements in Autocracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139043250
[310]
Stephanie, Rousseau and Anahi, Morales, Hudon, ‘Paths towards Autonomy in Indigenous Women’s Movements: Mexico, Peru, Bolivia’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 48, no. 01, pp. 33–60, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1017/S0022216X15000802. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-latin-american-studies/issue/9AE34C14466969585C0FAF75F932518B
[311]
Sarah Chartock, ‘"Corporatism With Adjectives”? Conceptualizing Civil Society Incorporation and Indigenous Participation in Latin America’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 52–76, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2013.00193.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/AFBE6AFC6BF7E25556530F2CD2C4635C
[312]
M. E. Keck and K. Sikkink, Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1998.
[313]
O. G. Encarnación, ‘Latin America’s Gay Rights Revolution’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 104–118, 2011, doi: 10.1353/jod.2011.0029.
[314]
O. G. Encarnación, Out in the Periphery. Oxford University Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199356645.001.0001/acprof-9780199356645
[315]
Marcus J. McGee and Karen Kampwirth, ‘The Co-optation of LGBT Movements in Mexico and Nicaragua: Modernizing Clientelism?’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 51–73, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2015.00290.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/1AEE77E030F762310BBCF4E1F53A7953
[316]
J. Diez, The Politics of Gay Marriage in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781316162804
[317]
Timothy J. Power and Mary A. Clark, ‘Does Trust Matter? Interpersonal Trust and Democratic Values in Chile, Costa Rica, and Mexico’, in Citizen views of democracy in Latin America, vol. Pitt Latin American series, [Pittsburgh]: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2001, pp. 51–70 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hjp4v.5
[318]
F. C. Turner, ‘Reassessing political culture’, in Latin America in comparative perspective: new approaches to methods and analysis, vol. Latin America in global perspective, Boulder: Westview Press, 1995, pp. 195–226.
[319]
Alejandro Moreno, ‘Democracy and Mass Belief Systems in Latin America’, in Citizen views of democracy in Latin America, vol. Pitt Latin American series, [Pittsburgh]: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2001, pp. 25–50 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hjp4v.4
[320]
P. Oxhorn, Sustaining civil society: economic change, democracy, and the social construction of citizenship in Latin America. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780271052236/
[321]
Jamie Elizabeth Jacobs and Martín Maldonado, ‘Civil society in Argentina: Opportunities and challenges for national and transnational organisation’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 141–172, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/3875912
[322]
Laurence Whitehead, ‘Three international dimensions of democratization’, in The international dimensions of democratization: Europe and the Americas, Expanded ed., vol. Oxford studies in democratization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 3–25 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199243751.001.0001
[323]
Philippe C Schmitter, ‘The influence of the international context upon the choice of national institutions and policies in neo-democracies’, in The international dimensions of democratization: Europe and the Americas, Expanded ed., vol. Oxford studies in democratization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 26–54 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199243751.001.0001
[324]
L. Whitehead, ‘International aspects of democratization’, in Transitions from authoritarian rule: comparative perspectives, Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986, pp. 3–46.
[325]
Steven Levitsky, ‘Linkage versus leverage. Rethinking the international dimension of regime change’, Comparative Politics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 379–400, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/20434008
[326]
H. Yilmaz, ‘External-internal linkages in democratization: Developing an open model of democratic change’, Democratization, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 67–84, doi: 10.1080/714000257. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/fdem20/9/2
[327]
G. O’Donnell, ‘The United States, Latin America, democracy: variations on a very old theme’, in The United States and Latin America in the 1980s: contending perspectives on a decade of crisis, vol. Pitt Latin American series, Pittsburgh, Pa: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1986, pp. 353–377 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e1e4ba8f-df04-ec11-b563-0050f2f06092
[328]
Darren Hawkins, ‘Protecting democracy in Europe and the Americas’, International Organization, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 373–403, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/40071898
[329]
‘Democratization’, vol. 12, no. 4, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/fdem20/12/4
[330]
Jon C. Pevehouse, Democracy from Above. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511491078
[331]
L. Schoultz, National security and United States policy toward Latin America. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1987.
[332]
S. P. Huntington, The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century, vol. The Julian J. Rothbaum distinguished lecture series. Norman [Okla.]: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.
[333]
K. L. Remmer, ‘External pressures and domestic constraints: The lessons of the four case studies’, in Beyond sovereignty: collectively defending democracy in the Americas, vol. An Inter-American Dialogue book, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996, pp. 286–296.
[334]
T. J. Farer, Beyond sovereignty: collectively defending democracy in the Americas, vol. An Inter-American Dialogue book. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
[335]
A. F. Lowenthal, Exporting democracy: the United States and Latin America : case studies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.
[336]
Lars Schoutlz, ‘Evolving concepts of intervention: Promoting democracy’, in The globalization of U.S.-Latin American relations: democracy, intervention, and human rights, Westport, Conn: Praeger, 2002, pp. 27–45 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f9e6f47e-cc1e-ed11-bd6e-a04a5e5d2f8d
[337]
D. P. Forsythe, ‘The United Nations, democracy, and the Americas’, in Beyond sovereignty: collectively defending democracy in the Americas, vol. An Inter-American Dialogue book, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996, pp. 107–131.
[338]
Dexter S. Boniface, ‘Is there a democratic norm in the Americas? An analysis of the organization of American states’, Global Governance, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 365–381, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/27800350
[339]
T. F. Legler, S. F. Lean, and D. S. Boniface, Promoting democracy in the Americas. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.
[340]
Craig Arceneaux, ‘Issues, threats, and institutions: Explaining OAS responses to democratic dilemmas in Latin America’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 1–31, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/4490521
[341]
Andrew F. Cooper, ‘A tale of two mesas: The OAS defense of democracy in Peru and Venezuela’, Global Governance, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 425–444, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/27800584
[342]
Arturo Valenzuela, ‘Paraguay: The coup that didn’t happen’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 43–55, 1997, doi: 10.1353/jod.1997.0014. [Online]. Available: https://muse.jhu.edu/issue/989
[343]
Kevin J. Middlebrook, ‘Electoral observation and democratization in Latin America’, in Electoral observation and democratic transitions in Latin America, vol. U.S.-Mexico contemporary perspectives series, La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, 1998, pp. 3–29.
[344]
M. E. Keck and K. Sikkink, ‘Transnational advocacy networks in international politics: Introduction’, in Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1998, pp. 1–38 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6aa8fc25-6c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[345]
P. E. Sigmund, The United States and democracy in Chile. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.
[346]
T. H. Carothers, In the name of democracy: U.S. policy toward Latin America in the Reagan years. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.
[347]
T. Carothers, Aiding democracy abroad: the learning curve. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1999.
[348]
Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, ‘Diffusion and the international context of democratization’, International Organization, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 911–933, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/3877851
[349]
Steven E. Finkel, ‘The effects of U.S. foreign assistance on democracy building, 1990-2003’, World Politics, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 404–438, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/40060164
[350]
Carlos Santiso, ‘Promoting democratic governance and preventing the Recurrence of conflict: The role of the United Nations Development Programme in post-conflict peace-building’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 555–586, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/3875461
[351]
J. Heine and A. S. Thompson, Fixing Haiti: MINUSTAH and beyond. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2011.
[352]
Steven Levitsky and Kenneth M. Roberts, ‘Introduction: Latin America’s "Left Turn”: A Framework for Analysis’, in The resurgence of the Latin American left, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011, pp. 1–28 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9781421401614/
[353]
Steven Levitsky and Kenneth M. Roberts, ‘Conclusion: Democracy, development, and the left’, in The resurgence of the Latin American left, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011, pp. 399–428 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9781421401614/
[354]
Jorge G. Castañeda, ‘Latin America’s left turn’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 28–43, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/20031965
[355]
J. G. Castañeda and M. A. Morales, Leftovers: tales of the Latin American left. New York: Routledge, 2008.
[356]
Jon Beasley-Murray, Maxwell A Cameron, and Eric Hershberg, ‘Latin America’s left turns: an introduction’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 319–330, doi: 10.1080/01436590902770322. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ctwq20/30/2
[357]
K. Weyland, ‘The rise of Latin America’s two lefts: Insights from rentier state theory’, Comparative Politics, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 145–164, doi: 10.5129/001041509X12911362971918.
[358]
Maria Victoria Murillo, Virginia Oliveros, and Milan Vaishnav, ‘Electoral revolution or democratic alternation?’, Latin American Research Review, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 87–114 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/latin_american_research_review/v045/45.3.murillo.html
[359]
David Doyle, ‘The Legitimacy of Political Institutions: Explaining Contemporary Populism in Latin America’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 1447–1473, doi: 10.1177/0010414011407469. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cpsa/44/11
[360]
M. A. Cameron and E. Hershberg, Latin America’s left turns: politics, policies, and trajectories of change. Boulder [Colo.]: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2010.
[361]
Kurt Weyland, Raúl L. Madrid, and Wendy Hunter, Eds., Leftist Governments in Latin America: Successes and Shortcomings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778742
[362]
G. D. E. Philip and F. Panizza, The triumph of politics: the return of the left in Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador. Cambridge: Polity, 2011.
[363]
Karen L. Remmer, ‘The Rise of Leftist- Populist Governance in Latin America: The Roots of Electoral Change’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 947–972, doi: 10.1177/0010414011428595. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cpsa/45/8
[364]
E. Huber and J. D. Stephens, Democracy and the left: social policy and inequality in Latin America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2012.
[365]
Gustavo Flores-Macias, After neoliberalism: the left and economic reforms in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199891658.001.0001
[366]
S. Ellner, ‘Latin America’s Radical Left in Power: Complexities and Challenges in the Twenty-first Century’, Latin American Perspectives, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 5–25, doi: 10.1177/0094582X13478398.
[367]
Samuel Handlin, ‘Social Protection and the Politicization of Class Cleavages During Latin America’s Left Turn’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1582–1609, doi: 10.1177/0010414012463907. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cpsa/46/12
[368]
Saskia P. Ruth-Lovell, ‘Clientelism and the Utility of the Left-Right Dimension in Latin America’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 72–97, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2016.00300.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/EE92F54B0628787829D2A9CBD8D5177D
[369]
Kathleen Bruhn, ‘Defining the Left in Latin America’, Latin American Research Review, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 242–249, 2015, doi: 10.1353/lar.2015.0008. [Online]. Available: https://muse.jhu.edu/issue/31686
[370]
M. E. Keck, The Workers’ Party and democratization in Brazil. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.
[371]
E. Sader and K. Silverstein, Without fear of being happy: Lula, the Workers Party and Brazil. London: Verso, 1991.
[372]
M. H. Moreira Alves, ‘Something old, something new: Brazil’s partido dos trabalhadores’, in The Latin American left: from the fall of Allende to Perestroika, vol. Latin American perspectives series, Boulder: Westview Press, 1993, pp. 225–242 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=74d95db9-6e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[373]
Wendy Hunter, ‘The normalization of an anomaly: The Workers’ Party in Brazil’, World Politics, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 440–475, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/40060165
[374]
F. Macaulay, ‘The purple in the rainbow: Gender politics in the PT’, in Radicals in power: the Workers’ Party (PT) and experiments in urban democracy, London: Zed Books, 2003, pp. 176–201 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=2264202b-8336-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[375]
G. Baiocchi, ‘The long march through institutions: Lessons from the PT in power’, in Radicals in power: the Workers’ Party (PT) and experiments in urban democracy, London: Zed Books, 2003, pp. 206–226.
[376]
Günther Schönleitner, ‘Between liberal and participatory democracy: Tensions and dilemmas of leftist politics in Brazil’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 35–63, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/3875647
[377]
Kees Koonings, ‘Strengthening citizenship in Brazil’s democracy: Local participatory governance in Porto Alegre’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 79–99, doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2004.00097.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14709856/2004/23/1
[378]
P. R. Kingstone and T. J. Power, Democratic Brazil: actors, institutions, and processes, vol. Pitt Latin American series. Pittsburgh, Pa: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000.
[379]
M. D. G. Kinzo, J. Dunkerley, and University of London, Brazil since 1985: politics, economy and society. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, 2003.
[380]
Cesar Zucco, ‘The president’s “new” constituency: Lula and the pragmatic vote in Brazil’s 2006 presidential elections’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 40, no. 01, pp. 29–49, doi: 10.1017/S0022216X07003628. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-latin-american-studies/article/presidents-new-constituency-lula-and-the-pragmatic-vote-in-brazils-2006-presidential-elections/77CEF303DEFB36ABB1D572832F706B0D#
[381]
Wendy Hunter and Timothy J. Power, ‘Rewarding Lula: Executive power, social policy, and the Brazilian elections of 2006’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/4490505
[382]
J. L. Love and W. Baer, Brazil under Lula: economy, politics, and society under the worker-president. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
[383]
J. D. French, ‘The professor and the worker: Using Brazil to better understand Latin America’s plural left’, in Rethinking intellectuals in Latin America, vol. South by Midwest, Madrid: Iberoamericana, 2010.
[384]
Anthony Hall, ‘From Fome Zero to Bolsa Família: Social policies and poverty alleviation under Lula’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 38, no. 04, pp. 689–709, doi: 10.1017/S0022216X0600157X. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-latin-american-studies/issue/6000664124EFDF86FA32017F3DA8F525
[385]
Ronald E. Ahnen, ‘The politics of police violence in democratic Brazil’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 141–164, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/4490510
[386]
W. Hunter, ‘Brazil: The PT in Power’, in The resurgence of the Latin American left, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011, pp. 306–324 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9781421401614/
[387]
Amaury de Souza, ‘The Politics of Personality in Brazil’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 75–88, 2011, doi: 10.1353/jod.2011.0024. [Online]. Available: https://muse.jhu.edu/issue/22789
[388]
Do Amaral, Oswaldo Epower, Timothy, J, ‘The PT at 35: Revisiting Scholarly Interpretations of the Brazilian Workers’ Party’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 147–171 [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1756475771?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511
[389]
D. Samuels and C. Zucco, Jr., ‘Party-Building in Brazil: The Rise of the PT in Perspective’, in Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America, S. Levitsky, J. Loxton, B. Van Dyck, and J. I. Dominguez, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 305–330 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781316550564
[390]
Steve Ellner, ‘The radical potential of Chavismo in Venezuela: The first year and a half in power’, Latin American Perspectives, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 5–32, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/3185012
[391]
Daniel H. Levine, ‘The decline and fall of democracy in Venezuela: Ten theses’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 248–269, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/3339455
[392]
Margarita López-Maya, ‘Venezuela after the Caracazo: Forms of protest in a deinstitutionalized context’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 199–218, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/3339453
[393]
K. Roberts, ‘Social polarization and the populist resurgence in Venezuela’, in Venezuelan politics in the Chávez era: class, polarization, and conflict, Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner, 2003, pp. 55–72.
[394]
D. L. Norden, ‘Democracy in uniform: Chávez and the Venezuelan armed forces’, in Venezuelan politics in the Chávez era: class, polarization, and conflict, Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner, 2003, pp. 93–112 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=64404b17-7f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[395]
Sujatha Fernandes, ‘Barrio women and popular politics in Chávez’s Venezuela’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 97–127, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/30130812
[396]
Michael Coppedge, ‘Venezuela: Popular Sovereignty Versus Liberal Democracy’, in Constructing democratic governance in Latin America, Fourth edition., vol. An Inter-American Dialogue book, J. I. Domínguez and M. Shifter, Eds. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 2013, pp. 165–192.
[397]
S. B. Ellner and F. Rosen, ‘Chavismo at the crossroads: Hardliners, moderates and a regime under attack’, NACLA report on the Americas, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 8–12, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://search.proquest.com/docview/748678327?accountid=14511
[398]
R. Gott, In the shadow of the liberator: Hugo Chávez and the transformation of Venezuela. London: Verso, 2000.
[399]
Brian F. Crisp, ‘Democratizing the democracy? Crisis and reform in Venezuela’, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 27–61, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/166373
[400]
Damarys Canache, ‘From bullets to ballots: The emergence of popular support for Hugo Chávez’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 69–90, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/3177111
[401]
Anibal Romero, ‘Rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic: The agony of democracy in Venezuela’, Latin American Research Review, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 7–36, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/2504044
[402]
Jennifer McCoy, ‘Chavez and the end of “partyarchy” in Venezuela’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 64–77, 1999, doi: 10.1353/jod.1999.0049. [Online]. Available: https://muse.jhu.edu/issue/999
[403]
Jana Morgan, ‘Partisanship during the collapse of Venezuela’s party system’, Latin American Research Review, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 78–98, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/4499354
[404]
José E. Molina V, ‘The presidential and parliamentary elections of the Bolivarian revolution in Venezuela: Change and continuity (1998-2000)’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 219–247, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/3339454
[405]
J. McCoy, Venezuelan democracy under stress. Coral Gables, Fla: North-South Center Press, University of Miami, 1995.
[406]
José Pedro Zúquete, ‘The missionary politics of Hugo Chávez’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 91–121, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/30130840
[407]
Noam Lupu, ‘Who votes for “chavismo”?: Class voting in Hugo Chávez’s Venezuela’, Latin American Research Review, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 7–32, 2010, doi: 10.1353/lar.0.0083. [Online]. Available: https://muse.jhu.edu/issue/19697
[408]
Kirk A. Hawkins, ‘Who Mobilizes? Participatory Democracy in Chávez’s Bolivarian Revolution’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 31–66, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2010.00089.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/572921CE1B0C272CF03DC3FAC21EABA2
[409]
Damarys Canache, ‘The Meanings of Democracy in Venezuela: Citizen Perceptions and Structural Change’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 95–122, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2012.00166.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/AB8D7106503F254ADC3661B29BEB1929
[410]
Pedro Sanoja, ‘Ideology, institutions and ideas: Explaining political change in Venezuela’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 394–410, doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2009.00309.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14709856/2009/28/3
[411]
Oliver Heath, ‘Explaining the rise of class politics in Venezuela’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 185–203, doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2008.00271.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14709856/2009/28/2
[412]
T. Ponniah and J. Eastwood, Eds., The revolution in Venezuela: Social and Political Change Under Chavez. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, 2011.
[413]
Gregory Wilpert, ‘Collision in Venezuela’, New left review, no. 21 [Online]. Available: http://newleftreview.org/II/21/gregory-wilpert-collision-in-venezuela
[414]
Daniel H. Levine, ‘Goodbye to Venezuelan exceptionalism’, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 145–182, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/166321
[415]
M. R. Kulisheck and D. Canache, Reinventing legitimacy: democracy and political change in Venezuela, vol. Contributions in Latin American studies. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press, 1998.
[416]
Deborah L. Norden, ‘Democracy and military control in Venezuela: From subordination to insurrection’, Latin American Research Review, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 143–165, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/2504065
[417]
Barry Cannon, ‘Venezuela, April 2002: Coup or popular rebellion? The myth of a united Venezuela’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 285–302, doi: 10.1111/j.0261-3050.2004.00109.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14709856/2004/23/3
[418]
J. Buxton, The failure of political reform in Venezuela, vol. The political economy of Latin America series. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001.
[419]
Steve Ellner, ‘The contrasting variants of the populism of Hugo Chávez and Alberto Fujimori’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 139–162, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/3875581
[420]
Michael Penfold-Becerra, ‘Clientelism and Social Funds: Evidence from Chávez’s Misiones’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 63–84, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2007.tb00392.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/B8A93D8419499CBF63A04C9FB88C0D9A
[421]
José Pedro Zúquete, ‘The missionary politics of Hugo Chávez’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 91–121, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/30130840
[422]
B. Cannon, Hugo Chávez and the Bolivarian Revolution: populism and democracy in a globalised age. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt155jdtm
[423]
S. Fernandes, Who Can Stop the Drums? Urban Social Movements in Chávez’s Venezuela. Duke University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://read.dukeupress.edu/lookup/doi/10.1215/9780822391708
[424]
J. Beasley-Murray, ‘Constituent power and the Caracazo: The exemplary case of Venezuela’, in Latin America’s left turns: politics, policies, and trajectories of change, Boulder [Colo.]: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2010, pp. 127–144.
[425]
J. McCoy, ‘Venezuela under Chávez: Beyond liberalism’, in Latin America’s left turns: politics, policies, and trajectories of change, Boulder [Colo.]: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2010, pp. 81–100.
[426]
J. D. French, ‘Many lefts, One path? Chávez and Lula’, in Latin America’s left turns: politics, policies, and trajectories of change, Boulder [Colo.]: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2010, pp. 41–60.
[427]
Margarita López-Maya, ‘Venezuela: Hugo Chávez and the Populist Left’, in The resurgence of the Latin American left, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011, pp. 213–238 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9781421401614/
[428]
Jennifer L. Merolla and Elisabeth J. Zechmeister, ‘The Nature, Determinants, and Consequences of Chavez’s Charisma: Evidence From a Study of Venezuelan Public Opinion’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 28–54, doi: 10.1177/0010414010381076. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cpsa/44/1
[429]
R. Brading, Populism in Venezuela, vol. Routledge studies in Latin American politics. New York: Routledge, 2013.
[430]
Yannis Stavrakakis, Alexandros Kioupkiolis, Giorgos Katsambekis, Nikos Nikisianis, and Thomas Siomos, ‘Contemporary Left-wing Populism in Latin America: Leadership, Horizontalism, and Postdemocracy in Chávez’s Venezuela’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 51–76, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2016.00318.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/7F060550FC17F4489E119BC5C2E33E4F
[431]
Daniel Hellinger and David Smilde, Venezuela’s Bolivarian democracy: participation, politics, and culture under Chávez. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780822394310/
[432]
Paul W. Posner, ‘Laboring Under Chávez: Populism for the Twenty-first Century’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 26–50, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2016.00317.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/7F060550FC17F4489E119BC5C2E33E4F
[433]
Kent Eaton, ‘Recentralization and the Left Turn in Latin America: Diverging Outcomes in Bolivia, Ecuador, and Venezuela’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1130–1157, doi: 10.1177/0010414013488562. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cpsa/47/8
[434]
Matthew Rhodes-Purdy, ‘Participatory Populism: Theory and Evidence from Bolivarian Venezuela’, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 415–427, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1177/1065912915592183. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24637784
[435]
Kevin J. Middlebrook, ‘Introduction: Conservative Parties, Elite Representation, and Democracy in Latin America’, in Conservative Parties, the Right, and Democracy in Latin America, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000, pp. 1–50 [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=75734&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_1
[436]
J. Loxton, ‘The Authoritarian Roots of New Right Party Success in Latin America’, in The resilience of the Latin American right, J. P. Luna and C. Rovira Kaltwasser, Eds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014, pp. 117–140 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6f0a1931-a47d-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[437]
K. M. Roberts, ‘Democracy, Free Markets, and the Rightist Dilemma in Latin America’, in The resilience of the Latin American right, J. P. Luna and C. Rovira Kaltwasser, Eds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014, pp. 25–47.
[438]
K. Eaton, ‘New Strategies of the Latin American Right: Beyond Parties and Elections’, in The resilience of the Latin American right, J. P. Luna and C. Rovira Kaltwasser, Eds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014, pp. 75–93.
[439]
F. Domínguez, G. Lievesley, and S. Ludlam, Right-wing politics in the new Latin America: reaction and revolt. London: Zed, 2011.
[440]
James Loxton, ‘Authoritarian Successor Parties and the New Right in Latin America’, in Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America, Steven Levitsky, James Loxton, Brandon Van Dyke, and Jorge I. Domínguez, Eds. Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 245–272 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/EBC7A85E0FC57ABF5EA989FB4FFA2E1D/9781316550564c9_p245-272_CBO.pdf/authoritarian_successor_parties_and_the_new_right_in_latin_america.pdf
[441]
Manuel Antonio Garretón, ‘Atavism and Democratic Ambiguity in the Chilean Right’, in Conservative parties, the right, and democracy in Latin America, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000, pp. 53–79 [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=75734&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_53
[442]
P. M. Siavelis, ‘Chile: The Right’s Evolution from Democracy to Authoritarianism and Back Again’, in The resilience of the Latin American right, J. P. Luna and C. Rovira Kaltwasser, Eds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014, pp. 242–267.
[443]
S. Correa, ‘The Chilean Right after Pinochet’, in The legacy of dictatorship: political, economic and social change in Pinochet’s Chile, vol. Monograph series (University of Liverpool. Institute of Latin American Studies), Liverpool, UK: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of Liverpool, 1993, pp. 164–174 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=658f1591-0a1e-ed11-bd6e-a04a5e5d2f8d
[444]
M. Pollack, The new Right in Chile, 1973-97, vol. St. Antony’s series. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999.
[445]
Arturo Fontaine Talavera, ‘Chile’s Elections: The New Face of the New Right’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 70–77 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_democracy/v011/11.2fontaine_talavera.html
[446]
Tomás Moulián and Isabel Torres, ‘La problemática de la derecha política en Chile, 1964-1983’, in Muerte y resurreccion : los partidos politicos en el autoritarismo y las transiciones del Cono Sur, Marcelo Cavarozzi and Manuel Antonio Garretón, Eds. Santiago, Chile: FLACSO, 1989.
[447]
T. R. Scully, ‘Reconstituting party politics in Chile’, in Building democratic institutions: party systems in Latin America, Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1995, pp. 100–137.
[448]
Margaret Power, ‘Defending dictatorship: Conservative women in Pinochet’s Chile and the 1988 plebiscite’, in Radical women in Latin America: left and right, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2001, pp. 299–324 [Online]. Available: https://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780271052724/
[449]
A. E. Angell, ‘The Pinochet factor in Chilean politics’, in Democracy after Pinochet: politics, parties and elections in Chile, London: Institute for the Study of the Americas, 2007, pp. 139–162 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f3c9429d-8f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[450]
Patricio Silva, ‘Doing politics in a depoliticised society: Social change and political deactivation in Chile’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 63–78, doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2004.00096.x. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14709856/2004/23/1
[451]
Juan Pablo Luna, ‘Segmented party–voter linkages in Latin America: The case of the UDI’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 42, no. 02, pp. 325–356, doi: 10.1017/S0022216X10000465. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-latin-american-studies/issue/3534E9D8696191781BDA6D1CC4489438
[452]
Mauricio Morales Quiroga, ‘The Concertación’s Defeat in Chile’s 2009-2010 Presidential Elections’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 79–107, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2012.00154.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/issue/D552313160F813981D54C3E8CBE2B1F0
[453]
Kevin J. Middlebrook, ‘Party politics and democratization in Mexico: The Partido Acción Nacional in comparative perspective’, in Party politics and the struggle for democracy in Mexico: national and state-level analyses of the Partido Acción Nacional, vol. U.S.-Mexico contemporary perspectives series, San Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, 2001, pp. 3–44.
[454]
Y. Mizrahi, ‘The costs of electoral success: The Partido Acción Nacional in Mexico’, in Governing Mexico: political parties and elections, London: Institute of Latin American Studies, 1998, pp. 95–113 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0a9911b3-1a1e-ed11-bd6e-a04a5e5d2f8d
[455]
S. Loaeza, ‘The National Action Party (PAN): From the fringes of the political system to the heart of change’, in Christian democracy in Latin America: electoral competition and regime conflicts, Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 2003, pp. 196–246 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=71c52bb4-6d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[456]
A. Lujambio, ‘Democratization through Federalism? The National Action Party Strategy, 1939-2000’, in Party politics and the struggle for democracy in Mexico: national and state-level analyses of the Partido Acción Nacional, vol. U.S.-Mexico contemporary perspectives series, San Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, 2001.
[457]
David A. Shirk, ‘Mexico’s democratization and the organizational development of the National Action Party’, in Party politics and the struggle for democracy in Mexico: national and state-level analyses of the Partido Acción Nacional, vol. U.S.-Mexico contemporary perspectives series, San Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, 2001, pp. 95–128.
[458]
Soledad Loaeza, El Partido Acción Nacional: la larga marcha, 1939-1994 : oposición leal y partido de protesta, vol. Sección de obras de política y derecho. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1999.
[459]
B. Magaloni and A. Moreno, ‘Catching all souls: The Partido Acción Nacional and the politics of religion in Mexico’, in Christian democracy in Latin America: electoral competition and regime conflicts, Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 2003, pp. 247–272 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=526f50e8-cd1e-ed11-bd6e-a04a5e5d2f8d
[460]
R. A. Camp, ‘The PAN’s social bases: Implications for leadership’, in Opposition government in Mexico, 1st ed., Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1995, pp. 65–80.
[461]
R. Ai Camp, ‘Democracy Redux? Mexico’s Voters and the 2006 Presidential Race’, in Consolidating Mexico’s democracy: the 2006 presidential campaign in comparative perspective, Baltimore, Md: John Hopkins University Press, 2009, pp. 29-49-306–311 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6eafabad-6c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[462]
G. Flores-Macías, ‘Mexico’s 2012 Elections: The Return of the PRI’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 128–141, 2013, doi: 10.1353/jod.2013.0006.
[463]
S. T. Wuhs, ‘Mexico: The Partido Acción Nacional as a Right Party’, in The resilience of the Latin American right, J. P. Luna and C. Rovira Kaltwasser, Eds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014, pp. 219–241.
[464]
James A. McCann, ‘Time to Turn Back the Clock? Retrospective Judgments of the Single-Party Era and Support for the Institutional Revolutionary Party in 2012’, in Mexico’s evolving democracy: a comparative study of the 2012 elections, J. I. Domínguez, K. F. Greene, C. H. Lawson, and A. Moreno, Eds. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9781421415550
[465]
V. Romero, B. Magaloni, and A. Díaz-Cayeros, ‘Presidential Approval and Public Security in Mexico’s War on Crime’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 100–123, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2016.00312.x.
[466]
G. A. Flores-Macías, ‘Mexico’s Stalled Reforms’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 66–78, 2016, doi: 10.1353/jod.2016.0022.