1.
Caswell, ML. "’The Archive’ Is Not an Archives: On Acknowledging the Intellectual Contributions of Archival Studies”. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7bn4v1fk
2.
BS ISO 15489-1:2016 Information and Documentation. Records Management. Concepts and Principles. BSI; 2016. https://bsol.bsigroup.com/Bibliographic/BibliographicInfoData/000000000030298891
3.
Sue McKemmish. Traces: Document, record, archive, archives. In: Archives: Recordkeeping in Society. Vol Topics in Australasian library and information studies. Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University; 2005:1-20.
4.
Yeo G. Concepts of Record (1): Evidence, Information, and Persistent Representations. The American Archivist. 2007;70(2):315-343. doi:10.17723/aarc.70.2.u327764v1036756q
5.
Schellenberg, T. R. Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques. F.W. Cheshire; 1956. http://www2.archivists.org/publications/epubs
6.
MacNeil H, Eastwood T, eds. Currents of Archival Thinking. Second edition. Libraries Unlimited; 2017. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
7.
Jenkinson, Hilary, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Manual of Archive Administration.; 1922. http://www2.archivists.org/publications/epubs
8.
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives. Engaging with Records and Archives: Histories and Theories. (Foscarini F, MacNeil H, Mak B, Oliver G, eds.). Facet Publishing; 2016. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1424541&site=ehost-live&scope=site
9.
Rekrut A. Matters of substance: materiality and meaning in historical records and their digital images. Archives and Manuscripts. 2014;42(3):238-247. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.958865
10.
Smit F, ed. Archives in Liquid Times. Dutch Society for Archival Publications (S@P); 2017. http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/30942
11.
Dever M. Photographs and manuscripts: working in the archive. Archives and Manuscripts. 2014;42(3):282-294. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.956322
12.
Acker A. How cells became records: standardization and infrastructure in tissue culture. Archival Science. 2015;15(1):1-24. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9213-x
13.
Gilliland AJ, Caswell M. Records and their imaginaries: imagining the impossible, making possible the imagined. Archival Science. Published online 7 November 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9259-z
14.
Upward F. Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond: a personal reflection. Records Management Journal. 2000;10(3):115-139. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007259
15.
Yeo G. Concepts of Record (2): Prototypes and Boundary Objects. The American Archivist. 2008;71(1):118-143. doi:10.17723/aarc.71.1.p0675v40tr14q6w2
16.
InterPARES 3 Intellectual Framework.
17.
Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record. The Concept of Record: Report from the Second Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record, 30-31 May 1996. Vol Skrifter utgivna av Riksarkivet. Riksarkivet; 1998.
18.
Wooldridge JM. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 5th ed. South-Western Cengage Learning; 2013.
19.
Duranti, Luciana, Thibodeau, Kenneth. The Concept of Record in Interactive, Experiential and Dynamic Environments: the View of InterPARES*. Archival Science. 2006;6(1):13-68. doi:10.1007/s10502-006-9021-7
20.
Atherton, Jay. From Life Cycle to Continuum: Some Thoughts on the Records Management - Archives Relationship. Archiviria. 1985;(21).
21.
Kahle B. Universal Access to All Knowledge. The American Archivist. 2007;70(1):23-31. doi:10.17723/aarc.70.1.u114006770252845
22.
Craven, Louise. What Are Archives?: Cultural and Theoretical Perspectives : A Reader. Ashgate; 2008. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.4324/9781315547497
23.
Duranti, Luciana, Preston, Randy, InterPARES Project, Associazione nazionale archivistica italiana. International Reseach on Permanent Authentic Records in Electronic Systems (InterPARES) 2: Experimental, Interactive and Dynamic Records. CLEUP; 2008.
24.
Heather M. Conceptualizing an Authentic Electronic Record. Published online 2000.
25.
McKemmish, Sue, Piggott, Michael, Australia. The Records Continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives First Fifty Years. Vol Monash occasional papers in librarianship, recordkeeping and bibliography. Ancora Press in association with Australian Archives; 1994.
26.
Sue M. Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: A Continuum of Responsibility (Information Technology).
27.
Schwartz JM, Cook T. Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science. 2002;2(1-2):1-19. doi:10.1007/BF02435628
28.
Trace CB. What is recorded is never simply ‘what happened’: Record keeping in modern organizational culture. Archival Science. 2002;2(1-2):137-159. doi:10.1007/BF02435634
29.
Upward, Frank. Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties.
30.
Upward, Frank. Structuring the Records Continuum, Part Two: Structuration Theory and Recordkeeping.
31.
InterPARES 1 Template for Analysis.
32.
Yeo G. Rising to the level of a record? Some thoughts on records and documents. Records Management Journal. 2011;21(1):8-27. doi:10.1108/09565691111125071
33.
Yeo G. ‘Nothing is the same as something else’: significant properties and notions of identity and originality. Archival Science. 2010;10(2):85-116. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-010-9119-9
34.
Frank Upward. Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology).
35.
Ketelaar E. Cultivating archives: meanings and identities. Archival Science. 2012;12(1):19-33. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9142-5
36.
Cumming K. Ways of seeing: contextualising the continuum. Records Management Journal. 2010;20(1):41-52. doi:10.1108/09565691011036224
37.
MacNeil H, Eastwood T, eds. Currents of Archival Thinking. Second edition. Libraries Unlimited; 2017. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
38.
Ngoepe M, Makhubela S. "Justice delayed is justice denied”. Records Management Journal. 2015;25(3):288-305. doi:10.1108/RMJ-06-2015-0023
39.
Lemieux VL. The records-risk nexus: exploring the relationship between records and risk. Records Management Journal. 2010;20(2):199-216. doi:10.1108/09565691011064331
40.
Dirks J. Accountability, History, and Archives: Conflicting Priorities or Synthesized Strands? Archivaria. 2004;57. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/viewFile/12451/13554
41.
Birkinshaw P. Freedom of information and its impact in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly. 2010;27(4):312-321. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.006
42.
Longmore B. The Public Records (Scotland) Act 2011: creating a culture that values public records. Archives and Records. 2013;34(2):248-262. doi:10.1080/23257962.2013.830067
43.
Worthy B, Hazell R. Disruptive, Dynamic and Democratic? Ten Years of FOI in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs. 2017;70(1):22-42. doi:10.1093/pa/gsv069
44.
Moss M. The Hutton Inquiry, the President of Nigeria and What the Butler Hoped to See. The English Historical Review. 2005;120(487):577-592. doi:10.1093/ehr/cei121
45.
Thurston A. Integrity in Government through Records Management: Essays in Honour of Anne Thurston. (Lowry J, Wamukoya J, eds.). Ashgate; 2014.
46.
‘Say nothing’: silenced records and the Boston College subpoenas. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23257962.2013.859573
47.
Henttonen P. Privacy as an archival problem and a solution. Archival Science. 2017;17(3):285-303. doi:10.1007/s10502-017-9277-0
48.
Shepherd E. Freedom of Information, Right to Access Information, Open Data: Who is at the Table? The Round Table. 2015;104(6):715-726. doi:10.1080/00358533.2015.1112101
49.
Duchein M. The History of European Archives and the Development of the Archival Profession in Europe. The American Archivist. 1992;55(1):14-25. doi:10.17723/aarc.55.1.k17n44g856577888
50.
WORTHY B. More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government. Governance. 2010;23(4):561-582. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.x
51.
Birkinshaw P. Freedom of Information: The Law, the Practice and the Ideal. Vol The law in context series. 4th ed. Cambridge University Press; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844904
52.
Birkinshaw P. Government and Information: The Law Relating to Access, Disclosure and Their Regulation. 3rd ed. Tottel; 2005.
53.
Legislation and regulations | The National Archives. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/legislation/
54.
Wallace, David A., Cox, Richard J. Archives and the Public Good: Accountability and Records in Modern Society. Quorum Books; 2002. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=74622&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
55.
MacNeil, Heather, Eastwood, Terry. Currents of Archival Thinking Vol 1. Libraries Unlimited; 2010.
56.
Shepherd E, Stevenson A, Flinn A. The Impact of Freedom of Information on Records Management and Record Use in Local Government: A Literature Review. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2009;30(2):227-248. doi:10.1080/00379810903445000
57.
Shepherd E. Freedom of Information and Records Management in the UK: What has been the Impact? Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2007;28(2):125-138. doi:10.1080/00379810701607736
58.
Holmlund, Mona, Avery, Cheryl. Better off Forgetting?: Essays on Archives, Public Policy, and Collective Memory. University of Toronto Press; 2010. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/9781442689879
59.
McLeod J. Thoughts on the opportunities for records professionals of the open access, open data agenda. Records Management Journal. 2012;22(2):92-97. doi:10.1108/09565691211268711
60.
Shepherd E, Stevenson A, Flinn A. Records management in English local government: the effect of freedom of information. Records Management Journal. 2011;21(2):122-134. doi:10.1108/09565691111152053
61.
McKemmish S, Faulkhead S, Russell L. Distrust in the archive: reconciling records. Archival Science. 2011;11(3-4):211-239. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9153-2
62.
Tough A. Accountability, open government and record keeping: time to think again? Records Management Journal. 2011;21(3):225-236. doi:10.1108/09565691111186894
63.
Birkinshaw P. Government and Information: The Law Relating to Access, Disclosure and Their Regulation. 3rd ed. Tottel; 2005.
64.
Birkinshaw P. Freedom of Information: The Law, the Practice and the Ideal. Vol The law in context series. 4th ed. Cambridge University Press; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844904
65.
Interview with Dr Anne Thurston on Open Government and trustworthy records | Gov 2.0 Radio.
66.
Wallace, David A., Cox, Richard J. Archives and the Public Good: Accountability and Records in Modern Society. Quorum Books; 2002. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=74622&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
67.
Meijer A. Accountability in an Information Age: Opportunities and Risks for Records Management - ProQuest.
68.
Jimerson RC. Ripples across the pond: global implications of the Heiner Affair. 2011;39(1).
69.
Hurley C. Archivists and Accountability. 2006;34(2).
70.
McKemmish, Sue, Charles Sturt University. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society. Vol Topics in Australasian library and information studies. Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University; 2005.
71.
Wamukoya J. Records and archives as a basis for good government: implications and challenges for records managers and archivists in Africa. Records Management Journal. 2000;10(1):23-33. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007254
72.
Cox, Richard J. Ethics, Accountability and Recordkeeping in a Dangerous World. Vol Principles and practice in records management and archives. Facet; 2006.
73.
Caron DJ, Kellerhals A. Supporting Democratic Values Through a Relevant Documentary Foundation - An Evolutionary Complex.
74.
Public Sector Information | Europa - Information Society.
75.
Hurley C. Recordkeeping, Document Destruction and the Law (Heiner, Enron and McCabe). 2002;30(2).
76.
Council of Europe. Access to official documents Recommendation Rec (2002) 2 of the Committee of Ministers and explanatory memorandum. Published online 2003.
77.
Open Government Data | Open Knowledge Foundation Blog. doi:[object Object]
78.
Valge J, Kibal B. Restrictions on Access to Archives and Records in Europe: A History and the Current Situation. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2007;28(2):193-214. doi:10.1080/00379810701611951
79.
Council of Europe - Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents (CETS No. 205).
80.
The National Archives. The United Kingdom Report on the Re-use of Public Sector Information.
81.
Critical Archival Studies: An Introduction | Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies. doi:https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.50
82.
L, Hughes-Watkins. Moving Toward a Reparative Archive: A Roadmap for a Holistic Approach to Disrupting Homogenous Histories in Academic Repositories and Creating Inclusive Spaces for Marginalized Voices. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&context=jcas
83.
Sachs, Albie. Archives, Truth, and Reconciliation. Archivaria.:1-14. https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_proquest200553204&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2&lang=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,archives,%20truth%20and%20reconciliation%20sachs&offset=0
84.
Harris V. Antonyms of our remembering. Archival Science. 2014;14(3-4):215-229. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9221-5
85.
Archival Amnesty: In Search of Black American Transitional and Restorative Justice | Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies. doi:https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.42
86.
We Already Are - Sustainable Futures - Medium. https://medium.com/community-archives/we-already-are-52438b863e31
87.
Cifor M. Affecting relations: introducing affect theory to archival discourse. Archival Science. 2016;16(1):7-31. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9261-5
88.
An Archive of Feelings: Trauma, Sexuality, and Lesbian Public Cultures | Books Gateway | Duke University Press. https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/773/An-Archive-of-FeelingsTrauma-Sexuality-and-Lesbian
89.
Russell L. Affect in the archive: trauma, grief, delight and texts. Some personal reflections. Archives and Manuscripts. 2018;46(2):200-207. doi:10.1080/01576895.2018.1458324
90.
N, Laurent, M, Hart. Emotional Labour and Archival Practice: Reflection. http://www.ncarchivists.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/jsnca_vol15_laurent-hart-1.pdf
91.
Gilliland AJ, Caswell M. Records and their imaginaries: imagining the impossible, making possible the imagined. Archival Science. 2016;16(1):53-75. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9259-z
92.
Wilson JZ, Golding F. Latent scrutiny: personal archives as perpetual mementos of the official gaze. Archival Science. 2016;16(1):93-109. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9255-3
93.
Sloan K, Vanderfluit J, Douglas J. Not ‘Just my Problem to Handle’: Emerging Themes on Secondary Trauma and Archivists. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1090&context=jcas
94.
Duff WM, Flinn A, Suurtamm KE, Wallace DA. Social justice impact of archives: a preliminary investigation. Archival Science. 2013;13(4):317-348. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9198-x
95.
Dunbar AW. Introducing critical race theory to archival discourse: getting the conversation started. Archival Science. 2006;6(1):109-129. doi:10.1007/s10502-006-9022-6
96.
Confronting Our Failure of Care Around the Legacies of Marginalized People in the Archives. https://medium.com/on-archivy/confronting-our-failure-of-care-around-the-legacies-of-marginalized-people-in-the-archives-dc4180397280
97.
Gilliland A. Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twenty-first century. Archival Science. 2011;11(3-4):193-209. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9147-0
98.
Greene, Mark A. A Critique of Social Justice as an Archival Imperative: What Is It We’re Doing That’s All That Important? The American Archivist. 2012;76(2):302-334. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43490357?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
99.
Jimerson R. Archivists and Social Responsibility: A Response to Mark Greene. The American Archivist. 2013;76(2):335-345. doi:10.17723/aarc.76.2.2627p15350572t21
100.
Caswell M. Not Just Between Us: A Riposte to Mark Greene / Letter to the Editor. American Archivist. 2013;76(2). http://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.76.2.89324135v02r2q74
101.
Ramirez M. Being Assumed Not to Be: A Critique of Whiteness as an Archival Imperative | The American Archivist. https://americanarchivist.org/doi/full/10.17723/0360-9081.78.2.339
102.
Ishmael HJM. Reclaiming history: Arthur Schomburg. Archives and Manuscripts. 2018;46(3):269-288. doi:10.1080/01576895.2018.1559741
103.
Critical Archival Studies: An Introduction | Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies. doi:https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.50
104.
Ramirez M. Being Assumed Not to Be: A Critique of Whiteness as an Archival Imperative | The American Archivist. https://americanarchivist.org/doi/full/10.17723/0360-9081.78.2.339
105.
Brilmyer G. Center for the Study of Women | Why Disability Studies for Archives? | Center for the Study of Women. https://csw.ucla.edu/2018/07/13/why-disability-studies-for-archives/
106.
Schlesselman-Tarango G. The Legacy of Lady Bountiful: White Women in the Library. Library Trends. 2016;64(4):667-686. doi:10.1353/lib.2016.0015
107.
Identifying and Dismantling White Supremacy in Archives. http://www.gracenbrilmyer.com/dismantling_whiteSupremacy_archives3.pdf
108.
Goudarouli E, Sexton A, Sheridan J. The Challenge of the Digital and the Future Archive: Through the Lens of The National Archives UK. Philosophy & Technology. 2019;32(1):173-183. doi:10.1007/s13347-018-0333-3
109.
Duranti L. Whose truth? Records and archives as evidence in the era of post-truth and disinformation. In: Brown C, ed. Archival Futures. Facet; 2018:19-32. doi:10.29085/9781783302192.003
110.
How Archivists Could Stop Deepfakes From Rewriting History. https://gizmodo.com/how-archivists-could-stop-deepfakes-from-rewriting-hist-1829666009
111.
Robertson T. digitization: just because you can, doesn’t mean you should – tara robertson. http://tararobertson.ca/2016/oob/
112.
Noble SU. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York University Press; 2018. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1497317&site=ehost-live&scope=site
113.
Sutherland T. The Carceral Archive: Documentary Records, Narrative Construction, and Predictive Risk Assessment « CA: Journal of Cultural Analytics. https://culturalanalytics.org/2019/06/the-carceral-archive-documentary-records-narrative-construction-and-predictive-risk-assessment%EF%BB%BF/
114.
S. L. Ziegler. Digitization Selection Criteria as Anti-Racist Action. Code4Lib Journal. (45). https://journal.code4lib.org/articles/14667
115.
Cook T. ‘We Are What We Keep; We Keep What We Are’: Archival Appraisal Past, Present and Future. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2011;32(2):173-189. doi:10.1080/00379816.2011.619688
116.
Anne G. The Archival Paradigm: The Genesis and Rationales of Archival Principles and Practices: Council on Library and Information Resources. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub89/archival.html
117.
Thethi J. Archives and Inclusivity: Respectful descriptions of marginalised groups. – Intersectional GLAM. https://intersectionalglam.home.blog/2018/11/22/archives-and-inclusivity-respectful-descriptions-of-marginalised-groups/
118.
Wright K. Archival interventions and the language we use. Archival Science. Published online 15 May 2019. doi:10.1007/s10502-019-09306-y
119.
Mortensen P. The Place of Theory in Archival Practice.
120.
Lager Vestberg N. Archival Value. Photographies. 2008;1(1):49-65. doi:10.1080/17540760701786725
121.
International Council on Archives. Statement of Principles Regarding Archival Description. Archivaria. 1992;1(34). http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11837/12789
122.
Cook, Terry. What is Past is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas Since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift. Archiviaria. 1997;(43):17-63.
123.
Groth P, Gil Y, Cheney J, Miles S. Requirements for Provenance on the Web. International Journal of Digital Curation. 2012;7(1). doi:10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.213
124.
Duranti L. From Digital Diplomatics to Digital Records Forensics. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13229/14548
125.
Millar L. The Death of the Fonds and the Resurrection of Provenance: Archival Context in Space and Time.
126.
MacNeil H. Providing Grounds for Trust II: The Findings of the Authenticty Task Force of InterPARES.
127.
Ketelaar E. Archival Theory and the Dutch Manual.
128.
Cook, Terry. The Concept of the Archival Fonds in the Post-Custodial Era: Theory, Problems and Solutions. Archivaria. 1993;35.
129.
Muller, Samuel, Feith, Johan Adriaan, Fruin, R., Vereniging van Archivarissen in Nederland. Manual for the Arrangement and Description of Archives. Vol Archival classics series. Society of American Archivists; 2003.
130.
Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance, Sweden. The Principle of Provenance: Report from the First Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance 2-3 September 1993. Vol Skrifter utgivna av Svenska riksarkivet. Swedish National Archives; 1994.
131.
Brothman B. Orders of Value: Probing the Theoretical Terms of Archival Practice.
132.
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 1.
133.
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 2.
134.
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 3.
135.
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 4.
136.
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 5.
137.
Duranti, Luciana. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science. Scarecrow Press; 1998.
138.
Duranti L. Reliability and Authenticity: The Concepts and Their Implications.
139.
Duranti L, MacNeil H. The Protection of the Integrity of Electronic Records: An Overview of the UBC-MAS Research Project.
140.
Eastwood T. Nailing a Little Jelly to the Wall of Archival Studies.
141.
Eastwood T. What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important?
142.
Horsman P. The Last Dance of the Phoenix, or the De-discovery of the Archival Fonds.
143.
MacNeil H. Archival Theory and Practice: Between Two Paradigms.
144.
Nesmith T. Still Fuzzy, But More Accurate: Some Thoughts on the ‘Ghosts’ of Archival Theory.
145.
Ridener, John. From Polders to Postmodernism: A Concise History of Archival Theory. Litwin Books; 2009.
146.
Roberts J. Practice Makes Perfect, Theory Makes Theorists.
147.
Roberts J. What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important? Response to Terry Eastwood’s Paper.
148.
Duranti L. Concepts and principles for the management of electronic records, or records management theory is archival diplomatics. Records Management Journal. 2010;20(1):78-95. doi:10.1108/09565691011039852
149.
Mak B. On the Uses of Authenticity. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13381/14688
150.
Geoffrey Yeo. The Conceptual Fonds and the Physical Collection. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13384/14691
151.
Yeo G. Bringing Things Together: Aggregate Records in a Digital Age. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13407/14713
152.
Zhang J. Original Order in Digital Archives. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13410/14719
153.
Duranti L. Origin and Development of the Concept of Archival Description | Duranti | Archivaria. Archivaria. 1992;35. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/92f1/d3b23cfc46f8c4ed7638ca58fac9c05c4574.pdf
154.
O’Meara E, Tuomala M. Finding Balance between Archival Principles and Real-Life Practices in an Institutional Repository. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13385/14693
155.
Fear K, Donaldson DR. Provenance and credibility in scientific data repositories. Archival Science. 2012;12(3):319-339. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9172-7
156.
Williams C. Studying Reality: The Application of Theory in an Aspect of UK Practice.
157.
Bazerman C. The orders of documents, the orders of activity, and the orders of information. Archival Science. 2012;12(4):377-388. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9178-1
158.
Bunn J. Questioning autonomy: an alternative perspective on the principles which govern archival description. Archival Science. Published online 12 March 2013. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9200-2
159.
Findlay C. Archival activism. Archives and Manuscripts. 2016;44(3):155-159. doi:10.1080/01576895.2016.1263964
160.
Cook T. Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms. Archival Science. 2013;13(2-3):95-120. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7
161.
Bastian J. Taking Custody, Giving Access: A Postcustodial Role for a New Century. Archivaria. 2002;(53).
162.
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives. Engaging with Records and Archives: Histories and Theories. (Foscarini F, MacNeil H, Mak B, Oliver G, eds.). Facet Publishing; 2016. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1424541&site=ehost-live&scope=site
163.
ARMA Information Governance Professional Code of Ethics. https://www.arma.org/page/IGP_Ethics
164.
Archives and Records Association Code of Ethics. https://www.archives.org.uk/ara-code-of-ethics
165.
Caswell M. On archival pluralism: what religious pluralism (and its critics) can teach us about archives. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-012-9197-y
166.
McKemmish S, Gililand AJ, Lau A, eds. Research in the Archival Multiverse. Monash University Publishing; 2017. http://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=628143
167.
McKemmish S, Piggott M. Toward the Archival Multiverse: Challenging the Binary Opposition of the Personal and Corporate Archive in Modern Archival Theory and Practice. Archivaria. 2013;76. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13461/14781
168.
Cox, Richard J. Rethinking Archival Ethics. Journal of Information Ethics. 22:13-20. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1661892025?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
169.
Neazor M. Recordkeeping Professional Ethics and their Application. Published online 2007. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13146/14390
170.
Jimerson RC. Ethical Concerns for Archivists. The Public Historian. 2006;28(1):87-92. doi:10.1525/tph.2006.28.1.87
171.
Dingwall G. Trusting Archivists: The Role of Archival Ethics Codes in Establishing Public Faith. The American Archivist. 2004;67(1):11-30. doi:10.17723/aarc.67.1.mw0914r2p52xx2t4
172.
Gale C. Record-keeping as an ethical imperative. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2006;27(1):17-27. doi:10.1080/00039810600691221
173.
Benedict, Karen M., Society of American Archivists. Ethics and the Archival Profession: Introduction and Case Studies. Society of American Archivists; 2003.
174.
Cook M. Professional ethics and practice in archives and records management in a human rights context ∗. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2006;27(1):1-15. doi:10.1080/00039810600691205
175.
Danielson, Elena S. The Ethical Archivist. Society of American Archivists; 2010.
176.
Cox, Richard J. Ethics, Accountability and Recordkeeping in a Dangerous World. Vol Principles and practice in records management and archives. Facet; 2006.
177.
Menne-Haritz A. Access — The reformulation of an archival paradigm. Archival Science. 2001;1(1):57-82. doi:10.1007/BF02435639
178.
Vukliš, V. Archival Activism: Emerging Forms, Local Applications. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/112790sz#page-1
179.
Jenkinson H. A Manual of Archive Administration. 2nd ed. reprinted. Lund, Humphries; 1965.
180.
Schellenberg, T. R. Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques. F.W. Cheshire; 1956.
181.
Cook T. Fashionable Nonsense or Professional Rebirth: Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives. Archivaria. 2001;51. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12792/13989
182.
Cook T. Electronic Records, Paper Minds: The Revolution in Information Management and Archives in the Post-Custodial and Post-Modernist Era. Archives & Social Studies. Published online 2007.
183.
Brothman B. Declining Derrida: Integrity, Tensegrity, and the Preservation of Archives from Deconstruction. Archivaria. 1999;48. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12717/13894
184.
Bastian J. A Question of Custody: The Colonial Archives of the United States Virgin Islands. The American Archivist. 2001;64(1):96-114. doi:10.17723/aarc.64.1.h6k872252u2gr377
185.
MacNeil H. Trusting Records in a Postmodern World. Archivaria. 2001;51. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12793/13991
186.
Tom Nesmith. Seeing Archives: Postmodernism and the Changing Intellectual Place of Archives. American Archivist. 2002;65. https://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.65.1.rr48450509r0712u
187.
Ham G. Archival Strategies for the Post-Custodial Era. The American Archivist. 1981;44-3.
188.
Harris V. Claiming Less, Delivering More: A Critique of Positivist Formulations on Archives in South Africa. Archivaria. 1997;44. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12200/13217
189.
Derrida, Jacques, Prenowitz, Eric. Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. Vol Religion and postmodernism. University of Chicago Press; 1996.
190.
Cook T. Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts. Archival Science. 2001;1(1):3-24. doi:10.1007/BF02435636
191.
Cook T, Schwartz JM. Archives, records, and power: From (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance. Archival Science. 2002;2(3-4):171-185. doi:10.1007/BF02435620
192.
Reed B. Reinventing access. Archives and Manuscripts. 2014;42(2):123-132. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.926823
193.
Vilar P, Sauperl A. Archives, Quo Vadis et Cum Quibus?: Archivists’ self-perceptions and perceptions of users of contemporary archives. International Journal of Information Management. 2015;35(5):551-560. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.06.001
194.
Flanagan M, Carini P. How Games Can Help Us Access and Understand Archival Images. The American Archivist. 2012;75(2):514-537. doi:10.17723/aarc.75.2.b424537w27970gu4
195.
Duff W, Johnson C. Where Is the List with All the Names? Information-Seeking Behavior of Genealogists. The American Archivist. 2003;66(1):79-95. doi:10.17723/aarc.66.1.l375uj047224737n
196.
Prom C. Using Web Analytics to Improve Online Access to Archival Resources. The American Archivist. 2011;74(1):158-184. doi:10.17723/aarc.74.1.h56018515230417v
197.
Fear K. User Understanding of Metadata in Digital Image Collections: Or, What Exactly Do You Mean by ‘Coverage’? The American Archivist. 2010;73(1):26-60. doi:10.17723/aarc.73.1.j00044lr77415551
198.
Daniels M, Yakel E. Seek and You May Find: Successful Search in Online Finding Aid Systems. The American Archivist. 2010;73(2):535-568. doi:10.17723/aarc.73.2.p578900680650357
199.
Altman B, Nemmers J. The Usability of On-line Archival Resources: The Polaris Project Finding Aid. The American Archivist. 2001;64(1):121-131. doi:10.17723/aarc.64.1.80300272655rqu74
200.
Yakel E, Bost LL. Understanding Administrative Use and Users in University Archives - American Archivist - Volume 57, Number 4 / Fall 1994 - Society of American Archivists. The American Archivist. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40293870
201.
Yakel E, Torres D. AI: Archival Intelligence and User Expertise. The American Archivist. 2003;66(1):51-78. doi:10.17723/aarc.66.1.q022h85pn51n5800
202.
The Guide to Researching Audiences.
203.
Daines JG, Nimer CL. Re-Imagining Archival Display: Creating User-Friendly Finding Aids. Journal of Archival Organization. 2011;9(1):4-31. doi:10.1080/15332748.2011.574019
204.
Sexton A, Turner C, Yeo G, Hockey S. Understanding users: a prerequisite for developing new technologies. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2004;25(1):33-49. doi:10.1080/0037981042000199133
205.
Chapman A. Collection-level description: Joining up the domains. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2004;25(2):149-155. doi:10.1080/0037981042000271475
206.
Hill A. Serving the invisible researcher: Meeting the needs of online users. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2004;25(2):139-148. doi:10.1080/0037981042000271466
207.
Lowry J. Radical empathy, the imaginary and affect in (post)colonial records: how to break out of international stalemates on displaced archives. Archival Science. 2019;19(2):185-203. doi:10.1007/s10502-019-09305-z
208.
Sato S. ‘Operation Legacy’: Britain’s Destruction and Concealment of Colonial Records Worldwide. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History. 2017;45(4):697-719. doi:10.1080/03086534.2017.1294256
209.
Espinal, Isabel. A Holistic Approach for Inclusive Librarianship: Decentering Whiteness in Our Profession. Library Trends. 2018;67(1):147-162. https://search.proquest.com/docview/2130845198?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511
210.
Schwartz JM, Cook T. Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science. 2002;2(1-2):1-19. doi:10.1007/BF02435628
211.
Lamont J. Records Management: An Expanding Role. http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/Editorial/Features/Records-management-an-expanding-role-96372.aspx
212.
Broady-Preston J. The information professional of the future: polymath or dinosaur? Library Management. 2010;31(1/2):66-78. doi:10.1108/01435121011013412
213.
Procter M. What’s an ‘Archivist’? Some Nineteenth-Century Perspectives. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2010;31(1):15-27. doi:10.1080/00379811003658476
214.
Scanlan K. ARMA v. SAA: The History and Heart of Professional Friction. The American Archivist. 2011;74. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23079045?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
215.
Millar, Laura. Explaining Ourselves: 40 Years of Archivaria. http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13542
216.
Ismail A, Jamaludin A. Records professionals: an invisible profession in Malaysia. Records Management Journal. 2011;21(1):69-75. doi:10.1108/09565691111125116
217.
Cline S. ‘To the Limit of Our Integrity’: Reflections on Archival Being. The American Archivist. 2009;72(2):331-343. doi:10.17723/aarc.72.2.g0321510717r6j14
218.
Shepherd, Elizabeth. Gatekeepers to the Profession: Archival e ducation, 1880–1980. In: Archives and Archivists in 20th Century England. Ashgate; 2009. doi:https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780754681922/startPage/186
219.
Jenkinson, Hilary. The English Archivist: A New Profession. H.K. Lewis; 1948.
220.
Elizabeth G, Rebecca S. ‘Golden Age,’ Quiescence, and Revival: How the Sociology of Professions Became the Study of Knowledge-Based Work. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258200542_Golden_Age_Quiescence_and_Revival
221.
Currall J, Moss M. We are archivists, but are we OK? Records Management Journal. 2008;18(1):69-91. doi:10.1108/09565690810858532
222.
McLeod J, Hare C. Development of RMJ: A mirror of the development of the profession and discipline of records management. Records Management Journal. 2010;20(1):9-40. doi:10.1108/09565691011036215
223.
Cline S. "Dust Clouds of Camels Shall Cover You”: Covenant and the Archival Endeavor. American Archivist. Published online 2012. https://americanarchivist.org/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.75.2.03193j1517858r34
224.
Shepherd E. Pioneering women archivists in England: Ethel Stokes (1870–1944), record agent. Archival Science. 2017;17(2):175-194. doi:10.1007/s10502-016-9272-x
225.
Lappin J. What will be the next records management orthodoxy? Records Management Journal. 2010;20(3):252-264. doi:10.1108/09565691011095283
226.
Ceeney N. The Role of a 21st-century National Archive—The Relevance of the Jenkinsonian Tradition, and a Redefinition for the Information Society. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2008;29(1):57-71. doi:10.1080/00379810802499868
227.
Shepherd E. Archives and Archivists in 20th Century England. Ashgate; 2009. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780754681922
228.
Gauld C. Democratising or privileging: the democratisation of knowledge and the role of the archivist. Archival Science. Published online 12 November 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9262-4
229.
Hall S. Constituting an archive. Third Text. 2001;15(54):89-92. doi:10.1080/09528820108576903
230.
Against Precarity: Towards a Community-Based Notion of Fiscal Sustainability. https://medium.com/community-archives/against-precarity-towards-a-community-based-notion-of-fiscal-sustainability-815d1d889309
231.
Flinn A, Stevens M, Shepherd E. Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream. Archival Science. 2009;9(1-2):71-86. doi:10.1007/s10502-009-9105-2
232.
Sexton A, Sen D. More voice, less ventriloquism– exploring the relational dynamics in a participatory archive of mental health recovery. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 2018;24(8):874-888. doi:10.1080/13527258.2017.1339109
233.
We Already Are - Sustainable Futures - Medium. https://medium.com/community-archives/we-already-are-52438b863e31
234.
Eveleigh A. Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives, ICA Congress Brisbane 2012.; 2012. http://ica2012.ica.org/files/pdf/Full%20papers%20upload/ica12Final00128.pdf
235.
Bastian JA, Flinn A, eds. Community Archives, Community Spaces: Heritage, Memory and Identity. Facet Publishing; 2020.
236.
Welland S, Cossham A. Defining the undefinable: an analysis of definitions of community archives. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. 2019;68(8/9):617-634. doi:10.1108/GKMC-04-2019-0049
237.
Flinn, A., Stevens, M. "It is noh mistri, wi mekin histri”. Telling Our Own Story: Independent and Community Archives in the United Kingdom, Challenging and Subverting the Mainstream. In: Community Archives: The Shaping of Memory. Vol Principles and practice in records management and archives. Facet; 2009. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049047
238.
Cole J, Nolan J, Seko Y, Mancuso K, Ospina A. GimpGirl grows up: Women with disabilities rethinking, redefining, and reclaiming community. New Media & Society. 2011;13(7):1161-1179. doi:10.1177/1461444811398032
239.
EICHHORN K. D.I.Y. Collectors, Archiving Scholars, and Activist Librarians: Legitimizing Feminist Knowledge and Cultural Production Since 1990. Women’s Studies. 2010;39(6):622-646. doi:10.1080/00497878.2010.490716
240.
Lau AJ, Gilliland AJ, Anderson K. NATURALIZING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN INFORMATION STUDIES. Information, Communication & Society. 2012;15(7):991-1015. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.630404
241.
Flinn, A. The Impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. In: The Future of Archives and Recordkeeping: A Reader. Facet; 2011. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14509809360004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
242.
Baker S, Huber A. Notes towards a typology of the DIY institution: Identifying do-it-yourself places of popular music preservation. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2013;16(5):513-530. doi:10.1177/1367549413491721
243.
Caswell M, Mallick S. Collecting the easily missed stories: digital participatory microhistory and the South Asian American Digital Archive. Archives and Manuscripts. 2014;42(1):73-86. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.880931
244.
Flinn, A. Independent Community Archives and Community-Generated Content: ‘Writing, Saving and Sharing our Histories’. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 2010;16(1):39-51. doi:10.1177/1354856509347707
245.
Stevens M, Flinn A, Shepherd E. New frameworks for community engagement in the archive sector: from handing over to handing on. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 2010;16(1-2):59-76. doi:10.1080/13527250903441770
246.
Gilliland A, Flinn A. Community Archives: What are we really talking about? In: Nexus, Confluence, and Difference: Community Archives Meets Community Informatics: Prato CIRN Conference Oct 28-30 2013,. Centre for Community Networking Research, Centre for Social Informatics, Monash University. http://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/920626/gilliland_flinn_keynote.pdf
247.
Bastian, Jeannette Allis, Alexander, Ben. Community Archives: The Shaping of Memory. Vol Principles and practice in records management and archives. Facet; 2009. doi:10.29085/9781856049047
248.
Gray V. ‘Who’s that Knocking on Our Door?’: Archives, Outreach and Community. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2008;29(1):1-8. doi:10.1080/00379810802499652
249.
Flinn A. Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges1. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2007;28(2):151-176. doi:10.1080/00379810701611936
250.
MacNeil H, Eastwood T, eds. Currents of Archival Thinking. Second edition. Libraries Unlimited; 2017. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
251.
Cifor, Marika C Michelle. ‘To Suddenly Discover Yourself Existing’: Uncovering the Impact of Community Archives. American Archivist. 2016;79(1). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0nd5g0p7
252.
Caswell, ML. Seeing Yourself in History: Community Archives in the Fight Against Symbolic Annihilation. The Public Historian: a journal of public history. Published online 2016. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9gc14537#page-1
253.
Flinn A. Chapter 8: The impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. In: The Future of Archives and Recordkeeping: A Reader. Facet; 2011:145-169. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f8a3983f-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
254.
Ramírez M. The Task of the Latino/a Archivist: On Archiving Identity and Community. Studies [eScholarship]. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 5(1), Article 3. Published online 2009. http://escholarship.org/uc/gseis_interactions?volume=5;issue=1
255.
Hopkins I. Places From Which to Speak. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2008;29(1):83-109. doi:10.1080/00379810802515069
256.
Cooper D. House proud: an ethnography of the BC Gay and Lesbian Archives. Archival Science. Published online 16 July 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9250-8
257.
Bastian, Jeannette Allis, Alexander, Ben. Community Archives: The Shaping of Memory. Vol Principles and practice in records management and archives. Facet; 2009. doi:10.29085/9781856049047
258.
McKemmish S. Evidence of me . . . (first published in Archives and Manucscripts, 24 (1) 1996.).
259.
Halilovich H. Reclaiming erased lives: archives, records and memories in post-war Bosnia and the Bosnian diaspora. Archival Science. 2014;14(3-4):231-247. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9227-z
260.
An argument for Archiving Facebook as a Heterogeneous Personal Store. http://www.csdl.tamu.edu/~marshall/DL14-marshall-and-shipman.pdf
261.
Leighton John J. Digital lives - an initial synthesis Version 0.1. Published online 2010.
262.
Lost in Translation: Understanding the Possession of Digital Things in the Cloud. http://willodom.com/publications/paper1202-odom.pdf
263.
paradigm | workbook on digital private papers.
264.
Catherine Hobbs. The Character of Personal Archives: Reflections on the Value of Records of Individuals. Archivaria. 2001;52. http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12817/14028
265.
Protocols for Native American Archival Materials.
266.
ATSILIRN - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Library and Information Resource Network.
267.
Iacovino L. Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Archival Science. 2010;10(4):353-372. doi:10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3
268.
Krebs AB. Native America’s twenty-first-century right to know. Archival Science. 2012;12(2):173-190. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9161-2
269.
Riley T. Prospects in First Nations Archives: Reflections based on my participation in the Tribal Archives, Libraries and Museums Institutes and Conference programs. Published online 2009. http://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/47975/1/Prospects%2520-%2520final.pdf
270.
Thorpe K. Protocols for libraries and archives in Australia: incorporating Indigenous perspectives in the information field. Published 2013. http://library.ifla.org/99/
271.
Roy L, Trace C, Gilbert S. Indigenous ways: assessing the awareness of and potential need for identifying content on indigenous world view in educating Libraries/Archives/Museum (LAM) entry level professionals. Published 2013. http://library.ifla.org/108/
272.
Christen K. Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. The American Archivist. 2011;74(1):185-210. doi:10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521
273.
Gilliland AJ. Moving past: probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia. Archival Science. 2014;14(3-4):249-274. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9231-3
274.
Hawkins DT. Personal Archiving: Preserving Our Digital Heritage. Information Today, Inc; 2013.
275.
Riva A. Pollard. The Appraisal of Personal Papers: A Critical Literature Review. Archivaria. 2001;52. http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12818/14030
276.
Jennifer Meehan. Rethinking Original Order and Personal Records. Archivaria. 2010;70:27-44. http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13294
277.
Creighton Barrett. Respect Which Fonds? Personal Archives and Family Businesses in Nova Scotia. Archivaria. 2013;76:75-92. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13459
278.
Amelia Acker. Death, Memorialization, and Social Media: A Platform Perspective for Personal Archives. Archivaria. 2014;77:1-23. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13469
279.
Anna Chen. Disorder: Vocabularies of Hoarding in Personal Digital Archiving Practices. Archivaria. 2014;78:115-134. http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13507
280.
Johnston R, Marwood K. Action heritage: research, communities, social justice. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 2017;23(9):816-831. doi:10.1080/13527258.2017.1339111
281.
Runnymede Trust. Finding Common Cause: building research collaborations between universities and Black and minority ethnic communities. https://www.runnymedetrust.org/uploads/publications/Runnymede%20Common%20Cause%20briefing%20FINAL.pdf
282.
Shilton K, Srinivasan R. Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections.
283.
Isto Huvila. The Unbearable Lightness of Participating? Revisiting the discourses of ’participation’ in archival literature. http://www.istohuvila.se/files/IstoHuvilaUnbearableLightnessPreprint.pdf
284.
Huvila I. Participatory archive: towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualisation of records management. Archival Science. 2008;8(1):15-36. doi:10.1007/s10502-008-9071-0
285.
Rolan G. Agency in the archive: a model for participatory recordkeeping. Archival Science. 2017;17(3):195-225. doi:10.1007/s10502-016-9267-7
286.
Theimer K. What Is the Meaning of Archives 2.0? The American Archivist. 2011;74(1):58-68. doi:10.17723/aarc.74.1.h7tn4m4027407666
287.
Waterton E, Smith L. The recognition and misrecognition of community heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 2010;16(1-2):4-15. doi:10.1080/13527250903441671
288.
Anderson S, Allen R. Envisioning the Archival Commons. The American Archivist. 2009;72(2):383-400. doi:10.17723/aarc.72.2.g54085061q586416
289.
Flinn, A., Pick, G. Diversifying and deomcratising archive collections - an agenda for transformation. In: Embedding Shared Heritage: The Heritage Diversity Task Force Report. Greater London Authority; 2009. http://www.mla.gov.uk/what/programmes/renaissance/regions/london/News_and_Resources/~/media/London/Files/2009/Publications/Embedding%20Shared%20Heritage_LOW%20resolution.ashx
290.
Lang C, Stillman L, Linger H, et al. COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS IN THE COMMUNITY. Information, Communication & Society. 2012;15(7):1081-1105. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.704061
291.
Battley B. Co-producing archival research with communication, reflexivity and friendship: crossing the three-wire bridge. Archival Science. 2017;17(4):371-391. doi:10.1007/s10502-017-9279-y
292.
Newman J. Revisiting Archive Collections: Developing Models for Participatory Cataloguing. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2012;33(1):57-73. doi:10.1080/00379816.2012.666404
293.
Flinn A, Sexton A. Research on community heritage: moving from collaborative research to participatory and co-designed practice. https://studylib.net/doc/12864587/research-on-community-heritage--moving-from-collaborative
294.
Bastian JA, Flinn A, eds. Community Archives, Community Spaces: Heritage, Memory and Identity. Facet Publishing; 2020.
295.
No red lines: Industry defuses ethics guidelines for artificial intelligence – AlgorithmWatch. https://algorithmwatch.org/en/industry-defuses-ethics-guidelines-for-artificial-intelligence/
296.
National Audit Office. Challenges in Using Data Across Government. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Challenges-in-using-data-across-government.pdf
297.
Lemieux VL. Trusting records: is Blockchain technology the answer? Records Management Journal. 2016;26(2):110-139. doi:10.1108/RMJ-12-2015-0042
298.
Goudarouli E, Sexton A, Sheridan J. The Challenge of the Digital and the Future Archive: Through the Lens of The National Archives UK. Philosophy & Technology. 2019;32(1):173-183. doi:10.1007/s13347-018-0333-3
299.
Kirk D, Sellen A. On Human Remains: Values and Practice in the Home Archiving of Cherished Objects. Microsoft Research. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/on-human-remains-value-and-practice-in-the-home-archiving-of-cherished-objects/
300.
Irons A. Computer forensics and records management – compatible disciplines. Records Management Journal. 2006;16(2):102-112. doi:10.1108/09565690610677463
301.
Rethinking the Web as a Personal Archive. Microsoft Research. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/rethinking-the-web-as-a-personal-archive/
302.
The Institute of Conservation Professional Standards in Conservation. https://www.icon.org.uk/resources/resources-for-conservation-professionals/standards-and-ethics/icon-professional-standards.html
303.
Michele V. Cloonan. The Boundaries of Preservation and Conservation Research. Libraries & the Cultural Record. 2011;46(2):220-229. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23053599?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
304.
Kim Y, Ross S. Closing the loop: Assisting archival appraisal and information retrieval in one sweep. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2013;50(1):1-10. doi:10.1002/meet.14505001042
305.
Harvey R, Thompson D. Automating the appraisal of digital materials. Library Hi Tech. 2010;28(2):313-322. doi:10.1108/07378831011047703
306.
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives. Engaging with Records and Archives: Histories and Theories. (Foscarini F, MacNeil H, Mak B, Oliver G, eds.). Facet Publishing; 2016. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1424541&site=ehost-live&scope=site
307.
Bunn J. Developing descriptive standards: a renewed call to action. Archives and Records. 2013;34(2):235-247. doi:10.1080/23257962.2013.830066
308.
Niu J. Organisation and description of datasets. Archives and Manuscripts. 2016;44(2):73-85. doi:10.1080/01576895.2016.1179585
309.
Gracy KF. Archival description and linked data: a preliminary study of opportunities and implementation challenges. Archival Science. 2015;15(3):239-294. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9216-2
310.
MacNeil H. What finding aids do: archival description as rhetorical genre in traditional and web-based environments. Archival Science. 2012;12(4):485-500. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9175-4
311.
Clough P, Tang J, Hall MM, Warner A. Linking archival data to location: a case study at the UK National Archives. Aslib Proceedings. 2011;63(2/3):127-147. doi:10.1108/00012531111135628
312.
Rolan G. Towards Archive 2.0: issues in archival systems interoperability. Archives and Manuscripts. 2015;43(1):42-60. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.959535
313.
When Archivists and Digital Asset Managers Collide: Tensions and Ways Forward | The American Archivist. http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.121
314.
Eito-Brun R. Context-based aggregation of archival data: the role of authority records in the semantic landscape. Archival Science. Published online 2 February 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9215-3
315.
Marty PF. An Introduction to Digital Convergence: Libraries, Archives, and Museums in the Information Age. The Library Quarterly. 2010;80(1):1-5. doi:10.1086/648549
316.
Niu J. Event-based archival information organization. Archival Science. Published online 13 June 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9222-4
317.
Ray J. Sharks, digital curation, and the education of information professionals. Museum Management and Curatorship. 2009;24(4):357-368. doi:10.1080/09647770903314720
318.
Cunningham A. Digital Curation/Digital Archiving: A View from the National Archives of Australia. The American Archivist. 2008;71(2):530-543. doi:10.17723/aarc.71.2.p0h0t68547385507
319.
Higgins S. Digital Curation: The Emergence of a New Discipline. International Journal of Digital Curation. 2011;6(2). doi:10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.191
320.
Timms K. New Partnerships for Old Sibling Rivals: The Development of Integrated Access Systems for the Holdings of Archives, Libraries and Museums. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13230/14549
321.
Lee C, Tibbo H. Where’s the Archivist in Digital Curation? Exploring the Possibities through a Matrix of Knowledge and Skills. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13362/14668
322.
Cumming K, Findlay C. Digital recordkeeping: are we at a tipping point? Records Management Journal. 2010;20(3):265-278. doi:10.1108/09565691011095292
323.
Kalfatovic MR, Kapsalis E, Spiess KP, Camp A, Edson M. Smithsonian Team Flickr: a library, archives, and museums collaboration in web 2.0 space. Archival Science. 2008;8(4):267-277. doi:10.1007/s10502-009-9089-y
324.
Museum Management and Curatorship - Volume 24, Issue 4. https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rmmc20/24/4
325.
Marsden C. Sectors and Domains: Some reflections on co-operation and integration. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2001;22(1):17-23. doi:10.1080/00379810120037469
326.
Robinson H. Remembering things differently: museums, libraries and archives as memory institutions and the implications for convergence. Museum Management and Curatorship. 2012;27(4):413-429. doi:10.1080/09647775.2012.720188
327.
Exploring Heritage in Participatory Culture: The MuseumApp | museumsandtheweb.com. http://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2011/papers/exploring_heritage_in_participatory_culture_th
328.
Strauss A. Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science. Published online 3 September 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3
329.
Gilliland AJ, Halilovich H. Migrating memories: transdisciplinary pedagogical approaches to teaching about diasporic memory, identity and human rights in archival studies. Archival Science. 2017;17(1):79-96. doi:10.1007/s10502-016-9265-9
330.
Ricardo P, Michelle C. Critical Directions for Archival Approaches to Social Justice. The Library Quarterly. http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/684145
331.
Matthews RJ. Is the archivist a "radical atheist” now? Deconstruction, its new wave, and archival activism. Archival Science. Published online 13 June 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9248-2
332.
Butler B. ‘Othering’ the archive—from exile to inclusion and heritage dignity: the case of Palestinian archival memory. Archival Science. 2009;9(1-2):57-69. doi:10.1007/s10502-009-9095-0
333.
Susan Pell. Radicalizing the Politics of the Archive: An Ethnographic Reading of an Activist Archive. Archivaria. 2015;80:33-57. http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13543/14896
334.
Flinn A, Alexander B. "Humanizing an inevitability political craft”: Introduction to the special issue on archiving activism and activist archiving. Archival Science. 2015;15(4):329-335. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9260-6
335.
Evans J, McKemmish S, Daniels E, McCarthy G. Self-determination and archival autonomy: advocating activism. Archival Science. 2015;15(4):337-368. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9244-6
336.
Jimerson, Randall C., Society of American Archivists. Archives Power: Memory, Accountability, and Social Justice. Society of American Archivists; 2009.
337.
Wakimoto DK, Bruce C, Partridge H. Archivist as activist: lessons from three queer community archives in California. Archival Science. 2013;13(4):293-316. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9201-1
338.
Flinn A. Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions [eScholarship]. interActions UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies. 2011;7(2).
339.
Sellie A, Goldstein J, Fair M, Hoyer J. Interference Archive: a free space for social movement culture. Archival Science. 2015;15(4):453-472. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9245-5
340.
Gilliland, Anne J. The Role of Participatory Archives in Furthering Human Rights, Reconciliation and Recovery. Atlanti: Review for Modern Archival Theory and Practice,. 24. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/346521tf
341.
Yaco S, Hardy BB. Historians, archivists, and social activism: benefits and costs. Archival Science. 2013;13(2-3):253-272. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9187-0
342.
Buchanan A, Bastian M. Activating the archive: rethinking the role of traditional archives for local activist projects. Archival Science. 2015;15(4):429-451. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9247-3
343.
Wood S, Carbone K, Cifor M, Gilliland A, Punzalan R. Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights. Archival Science. 2014;14(3-4):397-419. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9233-1
344.
Caswell M. Defining human rights archives: introduction to the special double issue on archives and human rights. Archival Science. 2014;14(3-4):207-213. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9226-0
345.
Schwartz JM, Cook T. Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science. 2002;2(1-2):1-19. doi:10.1007/BF02435628
346.
Harris V. The archival sliver: Power, memory, and archives in South Africa. Archival Science. 2002;2(1-2):63-86. doi:10.1007/BF02435631
347.
Sachs A. Archives, Truth, and Reconciliation. Archivaria. 2006;62. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12887/14118
348.
Hamilton, Carolyn. Refiguring the Archive. Kluwer Academic; 2002. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0570-8
349.
Cumming K, Picot A. Reinventing appraisal. Archives and Manuscripts. 2014;42(2):133-145. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.926824
350.
Schellenberg TR. The Appraisal of Modern Records.
351.
The National Archives Appraisal Policy Background Paper - The ‘Grigg System’ and Beyond.
352.
Cook T. Macroappraisal in Theory and Practice: Origins, Characteristics, and Implementation in Canada, 1950–2000. Archival Science. 2006;5(2-4):101-161. doi:10.1007/s10502-005-9010-2
353.
Significance 2.0: a guide to assessing the significance of collections - significance-2.0.pdf. https://www.arts.gov.au/what-we-do/museums-libraries-and-galleries/significance-20
354.
Booms H. Society and the Formation of a Documentary Heritage: Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources.
355.
Abraham T. Collection Policy or Documentation Strategy: Theory and Practice. The American Archivist. 1991;54(1):44-52. doi:10.17723/aarc.54.1.v2323483077xr227
356.
Cox R. The Documentation Strategy and Archival Appraisal Principles: A Different Perspective.
357.
Boles F, Young J. Exploring the Black Box: The Appraisal of University Administrative Records. The American Archivist. 1985;48(2):121-140. doi:10.17723/aarc.48.2.1414g624328868vw
358.
Bailey C. Past Imperfect? Reflections on the Evolution of Canadian Federal Government Records Appraisal. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13432/14742
359.
Hohmann P. On Impartiality and Interrelatedness: Reactions to Jenkinsonian Appraisal in the Twentieth Century. The American Archivist. 2016;79(1):14-25. doi:10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.14
360.
Wisniewski Timothy. Framers of the Kept: Against the Grain Appraisal of Ephemeral Moving Images. The Moving Image. 2008;7(2):1-24. doi:10.1353/mov.2008.0002
361.
Cynthia K. Sauer. Doing the Best We Can? The Use of Collection Development Policies and Cooperative Collecting Activities at Manuscript Repositories. The American Archivist. 2001;64(2):308-349. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/40294175?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Doing&searchText=the&searchText=best&searchText=we&searchText=can?&searchText=The&searchText=use&searchText=of&searchText=collection&searchText=development&searchText=policies&searchText=and&searchText=cooperative&searchText=collecting&searchText=activities&searchText=at&searchText=manuscript&searchText=repositories&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DDoing%2Bthe%2Bbest%2Bwe%2Bcan%253F%2BThe%2Buse%2Bof%2Bcollection%2Bdevelopment%2Bpolicies%2Band%2Bcooperative%2Bcollecting%2Bactivities%2Bat%2Bmanuscript%2Brepositories%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj50000557%26amp%3BSearch%3DSearch%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3BglobalSearch%3D%26amp%3BsbbBox%3D%26amp%3BsbjBox%3D%26amp%3BsbpBox%3D
362.
Mancuso L. Archival appraisal in Brazil. Archives and Manuscripts. 2013;41(2):146-159. doi:10.1080/01576895.2013.801101
363.
Kretzschmar R. Archival Appraisal in Germany: A Decade of Theory, Strategies, and Practices. Archival Science. 2006;5(2-4):219-238. doi:10.1007/s10502-005-9014-y
364.
Taylor I. The German appraisal discussion since 1990: an overview. Archives and Manuscripts. 2016;44(1):14-23. doi:10.1080/01576895.2015.1136226
365.
Cook M. Appraisal and access: We should expect changes driven by the media and by public awareness. Records Management Journal. 2010;20(1):72-77. doi:10.1108/09565691011039843
366.
Eastwood T. Reflections on the Goal of Archival Appraisal in Demoncratic Societies.
367.
FORTIER N. Transparency, Compliance, and Accountability: Developing a Knowledge Infrastructure for Macroappraisal at Library and Archives Canada. Archival Science. 2005;5(2-4):343-360. doi:10.1007/s10502-005-9005-z
368.
The National Geospatial Digital Archives—Collection Development: Lessons Learned. Library Trends. 2009;57(3):490-515. doi:10.1353/lib.0.0049
369.
Carvalho C. Appraisal based on organic functional analysis: a case study in an electronic records environment. Records Management Journal. 2001;11(3):175-205. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007274
370.
Sims F. A new appraisal approach for English Heritage. Records Management Journal. 2002;12(1):8-13. doi:10.1108/09565690210427743
371.
Tschan R. A Comparison of Jenkinson and Schellenberg on Appraisal. The American Archivist. 2002;65(2):176-195. doi:10.17723/aarc.65.2.920w65g3217706l1
372.
Cox, Richard J. No Innocent Deposits: Forming Archives by Rethinking Appraisal. Scarecrow Press; 2004.
373.
Arias PB. Appraising the value of statistical records of the European Central Bank for retention scheduling purposes. Records Management Journal. 2008;18(3):205-220. doi:10.1108/09565690810916456
374.
Jonker AEM. No Privileged Past—Acquisition Revisited. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2009;30(1):67-80. doi:10.1080/00379810903264625
375.
Cook, Terry, Samuels, Helen Willa. Controlling the Past: Documenting Society and Institutions : Essays in Honor of Helen Willa Samuels. Society of American Archivists; 2011.
376.
Boles, Frank. Selecting & Appraising Archives & Manuscripts. Vol Archival fundamentals series. Society of American Archivists; 2005.
377.
Samuels H. Improving our disposition: documentation strategy. Archivaria. 1991;33.
378.
Craig, Barbara Lazenby. Archival Appraisal: Theory and Practice. K.G. Saur; 2004.
379.
SCOTT M. Functional appraisal of records: a methodology. Records Management Journal. 1997;7(2):101-114. doi:10.1108/eb027107
380.
Cox R, Samuels H. The Archivist’s First Responsibility: A Research Agenda to Improve the Identification and Retention of Records of Enduring Value. The American Archivist. 1988;51(1-2):28-42. doi:10.17723/aarc.51.1-2.gkw67424l3344ug8
381.
Alexander P, Samuels H. The Roots of 128: A Hypothetical Documentation Strategy. The American Archivist. 1987;50(4):518-531. doi:10.17723/aarc.50.4.v889q1182r11p36u
382.
Honer E, Graham S. Should Users Have a Role in Determining the Future Archive? The Approach Adopted by the Public Record Office, the UK National Archive, to the Selection of Records for Permanent Preservation | Honer | LIBER Quarterly.
383.
MacNeil H, Eastwood T, eds. Currents of Archival Thinking. Second edition. Libraries Unlimited; 2017. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
