[1]
Caswell, ML, ‘"’The Archive’ Is Not an Archives: On Acknowledging the Intellectual Contributions of Archival Studies”’. [Online]. Available: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7bn4v1fk
[2]
BS ISO 15489-1:2016 Information and documentation. Records management. Concepts and principles. BSI, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://bsol.bsigroup.com/Bibliographic/BibliographicInfoData/000000000030298891
[3]
Sue McKemmish, ‘Traces: Document, record, archive, archives’, in Archives: recordkeeping in society, vol. Topics in Australasian library and information studies, Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University, 2005, pp. 1–20.
[4]
G. Yeo, ‘Concepts of Record (1): Evidence, Information, and Persistent Representations’, The American Archivist, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 315–343, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.17723/aarc.70.2.u327764v1036756q.
[5]
Schellenberg, T. R., Modern archives: principles and techniques. Melbourne: F.W. Cheshire, 1956 [Online]. Available: http://www2.archivists.org/publications/epubs
[6]
H. MacNeil and T. Eastwood, Eds., Currents of archival thinking, Second edition. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited, 2017 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
[7]
Jenkinson, Hilary and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Manual of archive administration. 1922 [Online]. Available: http://www2.archivists.org/publications/epubs
[8]
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives, Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. London: Facet Publishing, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1424541&site=ehost-live&scope=site
[9]
A. Rekrut, ‘Matters of substance: materiality and meaning in historical records and their digital images’, Archives and Manuscripts, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 238–247, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1080/01576895.2014.958865.
[10]
F. Smit, Ed., Archives in Liquid Times. Dutch Society for Archival Publications (S@P), 2017 [Online]. Available: http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/30942
[11]
M. Dever, ‘Photographs and manuscripts: working in the archive’, Archives and Manuscripts, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 282–294, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1080/01576895.2014.956322.
[12]
A. Acker, ‘How cells became records: standardization and infrastructure in tissue culture’, Archival Science, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–24, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10502-013-9213-x.
[13]
A. J. Gilliland and M. Caswell, ‘Records and their imaginaries: imagining the impossible, making possible the imagined’, Archival Science, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10502-015-9259-z.
[14]
F. Upward, ‘Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond: a personal reflection’, Records Management Journal, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 115–139, 2000, doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000007259.
[15]
G. Yeo, ‘Concepts of Record (2): Prototypes and Boundary Objects’, The American Archivist, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 118–143, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.17723/aarc.71.1.p0675v40tr14q6w2.
[16]
‘InterPARES 3 Intellectual Framework’. .
[17]
Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record, The concept of record: report from the second Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record, 30-31 May 1996, vol. Skrifter utgivna av Riksarkivet. [Stockholm]: Riksarkivet, 1998.
[18]
J. M. Wooldridge, Introductory econometrics: a modern approach, 5th ed. Mason, Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning, 2013.
[19]
Duranti, Luciana and Thibodeau, Kenneth, ‘The Concept of Record in Interactive, Experiential and Dynamic Environments: the View of InterPARES*’, Archival Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13–68, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1007/s10502-006-9021-7.
[20]
Atherton, Jay, ‘From Life Cycle to Continuum: Some Thoughts on the Records Management - Archives Relationship’, Archiviria, no. 21, 1985.
[21]
B. Kahle, ‘Universal Access to All Knowledge’, The American Archivist, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 23–31, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.17723/aarc.70.1.u114006770252845.
[22]
Craven, Louise, What are archives?: cultural and theoretical perspectives : a reader. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.4324/9781315547497
[23]
Duranti, Luciana, Preston, Randy, InterPARES Project, and Associazione nazionale archivistica italiana, International reseach on permanent authentic records in electronic systems (InterPARES) 2: Experimental, interactive and dynamic records. Padova: CLEUP, 2008.
[24]
M. Heather, ‘Conceptualizing an Authentic Electronic Record’. 2000.
[25]
McKemmish, Sue, Piggott, Michael, and Australia, The Records continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives first fifty years, vol. Monash occasional papers in librarianship, recordkeeping and bibliography. Clayton: Ancora Press in association with Australian Archives, 1994.
[26]
M. Sue, ‘Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: A Continuum of Responsibility (Information Technology)’, 1997. .
[27]
J. M. Schwartz and T. Cook, ‘Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory’, Archival Science, vol. 2, no. 1–2, pp. 1–19, Mar. 2002, doi: 10.1007/BF02435628.
[28]
C. B. Trace, ‘What is recorded is never simply “what happened”: Record keeping in modern organizational culture’, Archival Science, vol. 2, no. 1–2, pp. 137–159, Mar. 2002, doi: 10.1007/BF02435634.
[29]
Upward, Frank, ‘Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties’, 1996. .
[30]
Upward, Frank, ‘Structuring the Records Continuum, Part Two: Structuration Theory and Recordkeeping’. .
[31]
‘InterPARES 1 Template for Analysis’. .
[32]
G. Yeo, ‘Rising to the level of a record? Some thoughts on records and documents’, Records Management Journal, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 8–27, 2011, doi: 10.1108/09565691111125071.
[33]
G. Yeo, ‘“Nothing is the same as something else”: significant properties and notions of identity and originality’, Archival Science, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 85–116, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-010-9119-9
[34]
Frank Upward, ‘Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology)’, 1996. .
[35]
E. Ketelaar, ‘Cultivating archives: meanings and identities’, Archival Science, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 19–33, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10502-011-9142-5.
[36]
K. Cumming, ‘Ways of seeing: contextualising the continuum’, Records Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 41–52, 2010, doi: 10.1108/09565691011036224.
[37]
H. MacNeil and T. Eastwood, Eds., Currents of archival thinking, Second edition. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited, 2017 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
[38]
M. Ngoepe and S. Makhubela, ‘"Justice delayed is justice denied”’, Records Management Journal, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 288–305, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1108/RMJ-06-2015-0023.
[39]
V. L. Lemieux, ‘The records-risk nexus: exploring the relationship between records and risk’, Records Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 199–216, 2010, doi: 10.1108/09565691011064331.
[40]
J. Dirks, ‘Accountability, History, and Archives: Conflicting Priorities or Synthesized Strands?’, Archivaria, vol. 57, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/viewFile/12451/13554
[41]
P. Birkinshaw, ‘Freedom of information and its impact in the United Kingdom’, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 312–321, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.006.
[42]
B. Longmore, ‘The Public Records (Scotland) Act 2011: creating a culture that values public records’, Archives and Records, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 248–262, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1080/23257962.2013.830067.
[43]
B. Worthy and R. Hazell, ‘Disruptive, Dynamic and Democratic? Ten Years of FOI in the UK’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 22–42, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1093/pa/gsv069.
[44]
M. Moss, ‘The Hutton Inquiry, the President of Nigeria and What the Butler Hoped to See’, The English Historical Review, vol. 120, no. 487, pp. 577–592, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1093/ehr/cei121.
[45]
A. Thurston, Integrity in government through records management: essays in honour of Anne Thurston. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate, 2014.
[46]
‘“Say nothing”: silenced records and the Boston College subpoenas’ [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23257962.2013.859573
[47]
P. Henttonen, ‘Privacy as an archival problem and a solution’, Archival Science, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 285–303, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10502-017-9277-0.
[48]
E. Shepherd, ‘Freedom of Information, Right to Access Information, Open Data: Who is at the Table?’, The Round Table, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 715–726, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1080/00358533.2015.1112101.
[49]
M. Duchein, ‘The History of European Archives and the Development of the Archival Profession in Europe’, The American Archivist, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 14–25, Jan. 1992, doi: 10.17723/aarc.55.1.k17n44g856577888.
[50]
B. WORTHY, ‘More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government’, Governance, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 561–582, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.x.
[51]
P. Birkinshaw, Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal, 4th ed., vol. The law in context series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844904
[52]
P. Birkinshaw, Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation, 3rd ed. Haywards Heath: Tottel, 2005.
[53]
‘Legislation and regulations | The National Archives’. [Online]. Available: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/legislation/
[54]
Wallace, David A. and Cox, Richard J., Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. London: Quorum Books, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=74622&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
[55]
MacNeil, Heather and Eastwood, Terry, Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Oxford: Libraries Unlimited, 2010.
[56]
E. Shepherd, A. Stevenson, and A. Flinn, ‘The Impact of Freedom of Information on Records Management and Record Use in Local Government: A Literature Review’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 227–248, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1080/00379810903445000.
[57]
E. Shepherd, ‘Freedom of Information and Records Management in the UK: What has been the Impact?’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 125–138, Oct. 2007, doi: 10.1080/00379810701607736.
[58]
Holmlund, Mona and Avery, Cheryl, Better off forgetting?: essays on archives, public policy, and collective memory. London: University of Toronto Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/9781442689879
[59]
J. McLeod, ‘Thoughts on the opportunities for records professionals of the open access, open data agenda’, Records Management Journal, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 92–97, 2012, doi: 10.1108/09565691211268711.
[60]
E. Shepherd, A. Stevenson, and A. Flinn, ‘Records management in English local government: the effect of freedom of information’, Records Management Journal, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 122–134, 2011, doi: 10.1108/09565691111152053.
[61]
S. McKemmish, S. Faulkhead, and L. Russell, ‘Distrust in the archive: reconciling records’, Archival Science, vol. 11, no. 3–4, pp. 211–239, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10502-011-9153-2.
[62]
A. Tough, ‘Accountability, open government and record keeping: time to think again?’, Records Management Journal, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 225–236, 2011, doi: 10.1108/09565691111186894.
[63]
P. Birkinshaw, Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation, 3rd ed. Haywards Heath: Tottel, 2005.
[64]
P. Birkinshaw, Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal, 4th ed., vol. The law in context series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844904
[65]
‘Interview with Dr Anne Thurston on Open Government and trustworthy records | Gov 2.0 Radio’. .
[66]
Wallace, David A. and Cox, Richard J., Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. London: Quorum Books, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=74622&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
[67]
A. Meijer, ‘Accountability in an Information Age: Opportunities and Risks for Records Management - ProQuest’.
[68]
R. C. Jimerson, ‘Ripples across the pond: global implications of the Heiner Affair’, vol. 39, no. 1, 2011.
[69]
C. Hurley, ‘Archivists and Accountability’, vol. 34, no. 2, 2006.
[70]
McKemmish, Sue and Charles Sturt University, Archives: recordkeeping in society, vol. Topics in Australasian library and information studies. Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University, 2005.
[71]
J. Wamukoya, ‘Records and archives as a basis for good government: implications and challenges for records managers and archivists in Africa’, Records Management Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 23–33, 2000, doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000007254.
[72]
Cox, Richard J., Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world, vol. Principles and practice in records management and archives. London: Facet, 2006.
[73]
D. J. Caron and A. Kellerhals, ‘Supporting Democratic Values Through a Relevant Documentary Foundation - An Evolutionary Complex’. .
[74]
‘Public Sector Information | Europa - Information Society’. .
[75]
C. Hurley, ‘Recordkeeping, Document Destruction and the Law (Heiner, Enron and McCabe)’, vol. 30, no. 2, 2002.
[76]
Council of Europe, ‘Access to official documents Recommendation Rec (2002) 2 of the Committee of Ministers and explanatory memorandum’. Directorate General of Human Rights, Council of Europe, 2003.
[77]
‘Open Government Data | Open Knowledge Foundation Blog’. .
[78]
J. Valge and B. Kibal, ‘Restrictions on Access to Archives and Records in Europe: A History and the Current Situation’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 193–214, Oct. 2007, doi: 10.1080/00379810701611951.
[79]
‘Council of Europe - Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents (CETS No. 205)’, 2009. .
[80]
The National Archives, ‘The United Kingdom Report on the Re-use of Public Sector Information’. .
[81]
‘Critical Archival Studies: An Introduction | Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies’, doi: https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.50. [Online]. Available: https://journals.litwinbooks.com/index.php/jclis/article/view/50
[82]
L, Hughes-Watkins, ‘Moving Toward a Reparative Archive: A Roadmap for a Holistic Approach to Disrupting Homogenous Histories in Academic Repositories and Creating Inclusive Spaces for Marginalized Voices’ [Online]. Available: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&context=jcas
[83]
Sachs, Albie, ‘Archives, Truth, and Reconciliation’, Archivaria, pp. 1–14 [Online]. Available: https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_proquest200553204&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2&lang=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,archives,%20truth%20and%20reconciliation%20sachs&offset=0
[84]
V. Harris, ‘Antonyms of our remembering’, Archival Science, vol. 14, no. 3–4, pp. 215–229, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9221-5.
[85]
‘Archival Amnesty: In Search of Black American Transitional and Restorative Justice | Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies’, doi: https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.42. [Online]. Available: https://journals.litwinbooks.com//index.php/jclis/article/view/42
[86]
‘We Already Are - Sustainable Futures - Medium’. [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/community-archives/we-already-are-52438b863e31
[87]
M. Cifor, ‘Affecting relations: introducing affect theory to archival discourse’, Archival Science, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 7–31, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10502-015-9261-5.
[88]
An Archive of Feelings: Trauma, Sexuality, and Lesbian Public Cultures | Books Gateway | Duke University Press. [Online]. Available: https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/773/An-Archive-of-FeelingsTrauma-Sexuality-and-Lesbian
[89]
L. Russell, ‘Affect in the archive: trauma, grief, delight and texts. Some personal reflections’, Archives and Manuscripts, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 200–207, May 2018, doi: 10.1080/01576895.2018.1458324.
[90]
N, Laurent and M, Hart, ‘Emotional Labour and Archival Practice: Reflection’. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncarchivists.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/jsnca_vol15_laurent-hart-1.pdf
[91]
A. J. Gilliland and M. Caswell, ‘Records and their imaginaries: imagining the impossible, making possible the imagined’, Archival Science, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 53–75, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10502-015-9259-z.
[92]
J. Z. Wilson and F. Golding, ‘Latent scrutiny: personal archives as perpetual mementos of the official gaze’, Archival Science, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 93–109, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10502-015-9255-3.
[93]
K. Sloan, J. Vanderfluit, and J. Douglas, ‘Not “Just my Problem to Handle”: Emerging Themes on Secondary Trauma and Archivists’ [Online]. Available: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1090&context=jcas
[94]
W. M. Duff, A. Flinn, K. E. Suurtamm, and D. A. Wallace, ‘Social justice impact of archives: a preliminary investigation’, Archival Science, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 317–348, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10502-012-9198-x.
[95]
A. W. Dunbar, ‘Introducing critical race theory to archival discourse: getting the conversation started’, Archival Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 109–129, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1007/s10502-006-9022-6.
[96]
‘Confronting Our Failure of Care Around the Legacies of Marginalized People in the Archives’. [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/on-archivy/confronting-our-failure-of-care-around-the-legacies-of-marginalized-people-in-the-archives-dc4180397280
[97]
A. Gilliland, ‘Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twenty-first century’, Archival Science, vol. 11, no. 3–4, pp. 193–209, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10502-011-9147-0.
[98]
Greene, Mark A., ‘A Critique of Social Justice as an Archival Imperative: What Is It We’re Doing That’s All That Important?’, The American Archivist, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 302–334, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43490357?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[99]
R. Jimerson, ‘Archivists and Social Responsibility: A Response to Mark Greene’, The American Archivist, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 335–345, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.17723/aarc.76.2.2627p15350572t21.
[100]
M. Caswell, ‘Not Just Between Us: A Riposte to Mark Greene / Letter to the Editor’, American Archivist, vol. 76, no. 2, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.76.2.89324135v02r2q74
[101]
M. Ramirez, ‘Being Assumed Not to Be: A Critique of Whiteness as an Archival Imperative | The American Archivist’ [Online]. Available: https://americanarchivist.org/doi/full/10.17723/0360-9081.78.2.339
[102]
H. J. M. Ishmael, ‘Reclaiming history: Arthur Schomburg’, Archives and Manuscripts, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 269–288, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1080/01576895.2018.1559741.
[103]
‘Critical Archival Studies: An Introduction | Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies’, doi: https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.50. [Online]. Available: https://journals.litwinbooks.com/index.php/jclis/article/view/50
[104]
M. Ramirez, ‘Being Assumed Not to Be: A Critique of Whiteness as an Archival Imperative | The American Archivist’ [Online]. Available: https://americanarchivist.org/doi/full/10.17723/0360-9081.78.2.339
[105]
G. Brilmyer, ‘Center for the Study of Women | Why Disability Studies for Archives? | Center for the Study of Women’. [Online]. Available: https://csw.ucla.edu/2018/07/13/why-disability-studies-for-archives/
[106]
G. Schlesselman-Tarango, ‘The Legacy of Lady Bountiful: White Women in the Library’, Library Trends, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 667–686, 2016, doi: 10.1353/lib.2016.0015.
[107]
‘Identifying and Dismantling White Supremacy in Archives’. [Online]. Available: http://www.gracenbrilmyer.com/dismantling_whiteSupremacy_archives3.pdf
[108]
E. Goudarouli, A. Sexton, and J. Sheridan, ‘The Challenge of the Digital and the Future Archive: Through the Lens of The National Archives UK’, Philosophy & Technology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 173–183, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s13347-018-0333-3.
[109]
L. Duranti, ‘Whose truth? Records and archives as evidence in the era of post-truth and disinformation’, in Archival Futures, C. Brown, Ed. Facet, 2018, pp. 19–32.
[110]
‘How Archivists Could Stop Deepfakes From Rewriting History’. [Online]. Available: https://gizmodo.com/how-archivists-could-stop-deepfakes-from-rewriting-hist-1829666009
[111]
T. Robertson, ‘digitization: just because you can, doesn’t mean you should – tara robertson’. [Online]. Available: http://tararobertson.ca/2016/oob/
[112]
S. U. Noble, Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism. New York: New York University Press, 2018 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1497317&site=ehost-live&scope=site
[113]
T. Sutherland, ‘The Carceral Archive: Documentary Records, Narrative Construction, and Predictive Risk Assessment « CA: Journal of Cultural Analytics’ [Online]. Available: https://culturalanalytics.org/2019/06/the-carceral-archive-documentary-records-narrative-construction-and-predictive-risk-assessment%EF%BB%BF/
[114]
S. L. Ziegler, ‘Digitization Selection Criteria as Anti-Racist Action’, Code4Lib Journal, no. 45 [Online]. Available: https://journal.code4lib.org/articles/14667
[115]
T. Cook, ‘“We Are What We Keep; We Keep What We Are”: Archival Appraisal Past, Present and Future’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 173–189, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1080/00379816.2011.619688.
[116]
G. Anne, ‘The Archival Paradigm: The Genesis and Rationales of Archival Principles and Practices: Council on Library and Information Resources’. [Online]. Available: http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub89/archival.html
[117]
J. Thethi, ‘Archives and Inclusivity: Respectful descriptions of marginalised groups. – Intersectional GLAM’. [Online]. Available: https://intersectionalglam.home.blog/2018/11/22/archives-and-inclusivity-respectful-descriptions-of-marginalised-groups/
[118]
K. Wright, ‘Archival interventions and the language we use’, Archival Science, May 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10502-019-09306-y.
[119]
P. Mortensen, ‘The Place of Theory in Archival Practice’, 1999. .
[120]
N. Lager Vestberg, ‘Archival Value’, Photographies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 49–65, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1080/17540760701786725.
[121]
International Council on Archives, ‘Statement of Principles Regarding Archival Description’, Archivaria, vol. 1, no. 34, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11837/12789
[122]
Cook, Terry, ‘What is Past is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas Since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift’, Archiviaria, no. 43, pp. 17–63, 1997.
[123]
P. Groth, Y. Gil, J. Cheney, and S. Miles, ‘Requirements for Provenance on the Web’, International Journal of Digital Curation, vol. 7, no. 1, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.213.
[124]
L. Duranti, ‘From Digital Diplomatics to Digital Records Forensics’. [Online]. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13229/14548
[125]
L. Millar, ‘The Death of the Fonds and the Resurrection of Provenance: Archival Context in Space and Time’. .
[126]
H. MacNeil, ‘Providing Grounds for Trust II: The Findings of the Authenticty Task Force of InterPARES’. .
[127]
E. Ketelaar, ‘Archival Theory and the Dutch Manual’. .
[128]
Cook, Terry, ‘The Concept of the Archival Fonds in the Post-Custodial Era: Theory, Problems and Solutions’, Archivaria, vol. 35, 1993.
[129]
Muller, Samuel, Feith, Johan Adriaan, Fruin, R., and Vereniging van Archivarissen in Nederland, Manual for the arrangement and description of archives, vol. Archival classics series. Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 2003.
[130]
Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance and Sweden, The principle of provenance: report from the First Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance 2-3 September 1993, vol. Skrifter utgivna av Svenska riksarkivet. [Stockholm]: Swedish National Archives, 1994.
[131]
B. Brothman, ‘Orders of Value: Probing the Theoretical Terms of Archival Practice’, 1991. .
[132]
L. Duranti, ‘Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 1’, 1989. .
[133]
L. Duranti, ‘Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 2’, 1989. .
[134]
L. Duranti, ‘Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 3’, 1990. .
[135]
L. Duranti, ‘Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 4’, 1990. .
[136]
L. Duranti, ‘Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 5’, 1991. .
[137]
Duranti, Luciana, Diplomatics: new uses for an old science. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press, 1998.
[138]
L. Duranti, ‘Reliability and Authenticity: The Concepts and Their Implications’. .
[139]
L. Duranti and H. MacNeil, ‘The Protection of the Integrity of Electronic Records: An Overview of the UBC-MAS Research Project’. .
[140]
T. Eastwood, ‘Nailing a Little Jelly to the Wall of Archival Studies’, 1993. .
[141]
T. Eastwood, ‘What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important?’ .
[142]
P. Horsman, ‘The Last Dance of the Phoenix, or the De-discovery of the Archival Fonds’. .
[143]
H. MacNeil, ‘Archival Theory and Practice: Between Two Paradigms’. .
[144]
T. Nesmith, ‘Still Fuzzy, But More Accurate: Some Thoughts on the “Ghosts” of Archival Theory’, 1999. .
[145]
Ridener, John, From Polders to postmodernism: a concise history of archival theory. Duluth, Minn: Litwin Books, 2009.
[146]
J. Roberts, ‘Practice Makes Perfect, Theory Makes Theorists’. .
[147]
J. Roberts, ‘What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important? Response to Terry Eastwood’s Paper’. .
[148]
L. Duranti, ‘Concepts and principles for the management of electronic records, or records management theory is archival diplomatics’, Records Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 78–95, 2010, doi: 10.1108/09565691011039852.
[149]
B. Mak, ‘On the Uses of Authenticity’ [Online]. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13381/14688
[150]
Geoffrey Yeo, ‘The Conceptual Fonds and the Physical Collection’ [Online]. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13384/14691
[151]
G. Yeo, ‘Bringing Things Together: Aggregate Records in a Digital Age’ [Online]. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13407/14713
[152]
J. Zhang, ‘Original Order in Digital Archives’ [Online]. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13410/14719
[153]
L. Duranti, ‘Origin and Development of the Concept of Archival Description | Duranti | Archivaria’, Archivaria, vol. 35, 1992 [Online]. Available: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/92f1/d3b23cfc46f8c4ed7638ca58fac9c05c4574.pdf
[154]
E. O’Meara and M. Tuomala, ‘Finding Balance between Archival Principles and Real-Life Practices in an Institutional Repository’ [Online]. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13385/14693
[155]
K. Fear and D. R. Donaldson, ‘Provenance and credibility in scientific data repositories’, Archival Science, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 319–339, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10502-012-9172-7.
[156]
C. Williams, ‘Studying Reality: The Application of Theory in an Aspect of UK Practice’. .
[157]
C. Bazerman, ‘The orders of documents, the orders of activity, and the orders of information’, Archival Science, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 377–388, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10502-012-9178-1.
[158]
J. Bunn, ‘Questioning autonomy: an alternative perspective on the principles which govern archival description’, Archival Science, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10502-013-9200-2.
[159]
C. Findlay, ‘Archival activism’, Archives and Manuscripts, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 155–159, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1080/01576895.2016.1263964.
[160]
T. Cook, ‘Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms’, Archival Science, vol. 13, no. 2–3, pp. 95–120, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7.
[161]
J. Bastian, ‘Taking Custody, Giving Access: A Postcustodial Role for a New Century’, Archivaria, no. 53, 2002.
[162]
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives, Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. London: Facet Publishing, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1424541&site=ehost-live&scope=site
[163]
‘ARMA Information Governance Professional Code of Ethics’. [Online]. Available: https://www.arma.org/page/IGP_Ethics
[164]
‘Archives and Records Association Code of Ethics’. [Online]. Available: https://www.archives.org.uk/ara-code-of-ethics
[165]
M. Caswell, ‘On archival pluralism: what religious pluralism (and its critics) can teach us about archives’ [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-012-9197-y
[166]
S. McKemmish, A. J. Gililand, and A. Lau, Eds., Research in the archival multiverse. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: Monash University Publishing, 2017 [Online]. Available: http://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=628143
[167]
S. McKemmish and M. Piggott, ‘Toward the Archival Multiverse: Challenging the Binary Opposition of the Personal and Corporate Archive in Modern Archival Theory and Practice’, Archivaria, vol. 76, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13461/14781
[168]
Cox, Richard J, ‘Rethinking Archival Ethics’, Journal of Information Ethics, vol. 22, pp. 13–20 [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1661892025?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
[169]
M. Neazor, ‘Recordkeeping Professional Ethics and their Application’, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13146/14390
[170]
R. C. Jimerson, ‘Ethical Concerns for Archivists’, The Public Historian, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 87–92, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1525/tph.2006.28.1.87.
[171]
G. Dingwall, ‘Trusting Archivists: The Role of Archival Ethics Codes in Establishing Public Faith’, The American Archivist, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 11–30, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.17723/aarc.67.1.mw0914r2p52xx2t4.
[172]
C. Gale, ‘Record-keeping as an ethical imperative’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 17–27, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1080/00039810600691221.
[173]
Benedict, Karen M. and Society of American Archivists, Ethics and the archival profession: introduction and case studies. Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 2003.
[174]
M. Cook, ‘Professional ethics and practice in archives and records management in a human rights context ∗’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–15, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1080/00039810600691205.
[175]
Danielson, Elena S., The ethical archivist. Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 2010.
[176]
Cox, Richard J., Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world, vol. Principles and practice in records management and archives. London: Facet, 2006.
[177]
A. Menne-Haritz, ‘Access — The reformulation of an archival paradigm’, Archival Science, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 57–82, Mar. 2001, doi: 10.1007/BF02435639.
[178]
Vukliš, V, ‘Archival Activism: Emerging Forms, Local Applications’ [Online]. Available: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/112790sz#page-1
[179]
H. Jenkinson, A manual of archive administration, 2nd ed. reprinted. Lund, Humphries, 1965.
[180]
Schellenberg, T. R., Modern archives: principles and techniques. Melbourne: F.W. Cheshire, 1956.
[181]
T. Cook, ‘Fashionable Nonsense or Professional Rebirth: Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives’, Archivaria, vol. 51, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12792/13989
[182]
T. Cook, ‘Electronic Records, Paper Minds: The Revolution in Information Management and Archives in the Post-Custodial and Post-Modernist Era’, Archives & Social Studies, 2007.
[183]
B. Brothman, ‘Declining Derrida: Integrity, Tensegrity, and the Preservation of Archives from Deconstruction’, Archivaria, vol. 48, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12717/13894
[184]
J. Bastian, ‘A Question of Custody: The Colonial Archives of the United States Virgin Islands’, The American Archivist, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 96–114, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.17723/aarc.64.1.h6k872252u2gr377.
[185]
H. MacNeil, ‘Trusting Records in a Postmodern World’, Archivaria, vol. 51, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12793/13991
[186]
Tom Nesmith, ‘Seeing Archives: Postmodernism and the Changing Intellectual Place of Archives’, American Archivist, vol. 65, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.65.1.rr48450509r0712u
[187]
G. Ham, ‘Archival Strategies for the Post-Custodial Era’, The American Archivist, vol. 44–3, 1981.
[188]
V. Harris, ‘Claiming Less, Delivering More: A Critique of Positivist Formulations on Archives in South Africa.’, Archivaria, vol. 44, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12200/13217
[189]
Derrida, Jacques and Prenowitz, Eric, Archive fever: a Freudian impression, vol. Religion and postmodernism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
[190]
T. Cook, ‘Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts’, Archival Science, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–24, Mar. 2001, doi: 10.1007/BF02435636.
[191]
T. Cook and J. M. Schwartz, ‘Archives, records, and power: From (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance’, Archival Science, vol. 2, no. 3–4, pp. 171–185, Sep. 2002, doi: 10.1007/BF02435620.
[192]
B. Reed, ‘Reinventing access’, Archives and Manuscripts, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 123–132, May 2014, doi: 10.1080/01576895.2014.926823.
[193]
P. Vilar and A. Sauperl, ‘Archives, Quo Vadis et Cum Quibus?: Archivists’ self-perceptions and perceptions of users of contemporary archives’, International Journal of Information Management, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 551–560, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.06.001.
[194]
M. Flanagan and P. Carini, ‘How Games Can Help Us Access and Understand Archival Images’, The American Archivist, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 514–537, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.17723/aarc.75.2.b424537w27970gu4.
[195]
W. Duff and C. Johnson, ‘Where Is the List with All the Names? Information-Seeking Behavior of Genealogists’, The American Archivist, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 79–95, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.17723/aarc.66.1.l375uj047224737n.
[196]
C. Prom, ‘Using Web Analytics to Improve Online Access to Archival Resources’, The American Archivist, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 158–184, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.17723/aarc.74.1.h56018515230417v.
[197]
K. Fear, ‘User Understanding of Metadata in Digital Image Collections: Or, What Exactly Do You Mean by “Coverage”?’, The American Archivist, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 26–60, May 2010, doi: 10.17723/aarc.73.1.j00044lr77415551.
[198]
M. Daniels and E. Yakel, ‘Seek and You May Find: Successful Search in Online Finding Aid Systems’, The American Archivist, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 535–568, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.17723/aarc.73.2.p578900680650357.
[199]
B. Altman and J. Nemmers, ‘The Usability of On-line Archival Resources: The Polaris Project Finding Aid’, The American Archivist, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 121–131, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.17723/aarc.64.1.80300272655rqu74.
[200]
E. Yakel and L. L. Bost, ‘Understanding Administrative Use and Users in University Archives - American Archivist - Volume 57, Number 4 / Fall 1994 - Society of American Archivists’, The American Archivist [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40293870
[201]
E. Yakel and D. Torres, ‘AI: Archival Intelligence and User Expertise’, The American Archivist, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 51–78, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.17723/aarc.66.1.q022h85pn51n5800.
[202]
‘The Guide to Researching Audiences’. .
[203]
J. G. Daines and C. L. Nimer, ‘Re-Imagining Archival Display: Creating User-Friendly Finding Aids’, Journal of Archival Organization, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 4–31, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1080/15332748.2011.574019.
[204]
A. Sexton, C. Turner, G. Yeo, and S. Hockey, ‘Understanding users: a prerequisite for developing new technologies’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 33–49, Apr. 2004, doi: 10.1080/0037981042000199133.
[205]
A. Chapman, ‘Collection-level description: Joining up the domains’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 149–155, Oct. 2004, doi: 10.1080/0037981042000271475.
[206]
A. Hill, ‘Serving the invisible researcher: Meeting the needs of online users’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 139–148, Oct. 2004, doi: 10.1080/0037981042000271466.
[207]
J. Lowry, ‘Radical empathy, the imaginary and affect in (post)colonial records: how to break out of international stalemates on displaced archives’, Archival Science, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 185–203, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10502-019-09305-z.
[208]
S. Sato, ‘“Operation Legacy”: Britain’s Destruction and Concealment of Colonial Records Worldwide’, The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 697–719, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1080/03086534.2017.1294256.
[209]
Espinal, Isabel, ‘A Holistic Approach for Inclusive Librarianship: Decentering Whiteness in Our Profession’, Library Trends, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 147–162, 2018 [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/docview/2130845198?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511
[210]
J. M. Schwartz and T. Cook, ‘Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory’, Archival Science, vol. 2, no. 1–2, pp. 1–19, Mar. 2002, doi: 10.1007/BF02435628.
[211]
J. Lamont, ‘Records Management: An Expanding Role’ [Online]. Available: http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/Editorial/Features/Records-management-an-expanding-role-96372.aspx
[212]
J. Broady-Preston, ‘The information professional of the future: polymath or dinosaur?’, Library Management, vol. 31, no. 1/2, pp. 66–78, 2010, doi: 10.1108/01435121011013412.
[213]
M. Procter, ‘What’s an “Archivist”? Some Nineteenth-Century Perspectives’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 15–27, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1080/00379811003658476.
[214]
K. Scanlan, ‘ARMA v. SAA: The History and Heart of Professional Friction’, The American Archivist, vol. 74, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23079045?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[215]
Millar, Laura, ‘Explaining Ourselves: 40 Years of Archivaria’ [Online]. Available: http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13542
[216]
A. Ismail and A. Jamaludin, ‘Records professionals: an invisible profession in Malaysia’, Records Management Journal, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 69–75, 2011, doi: 10.1108/09565691111125116.
[217]
S. Cline, ‘“To the Limit of Our Integrity”: Reflections on Archival Being’, The American Archivist, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 331–343, Sep. 2009, doi: 10.17723/aarc.72.2.g0321510717r6j14.
[218]
Shepherd, Elizabeth, ‘Gatekeepers to the Profession: Archival e ducation, 1880–1980’, in Archives and archivists in 20th century England, Farnham: Ashgate, 2009.
[219]
Jenkinson, Hilary, The English archivist: a new profession. London: H.K. Lewis, 1948.
[220]
G. Elizabeth and S. Rebecca, ‘“Golden Age,” Quiescence, and Revival: How the Sociology of Professions Became the Study of Knowledge-Based Work’ [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258200542_Golden_Age_Quiescence_and_Revival
[221]
J. Currall and M. Moss, ‘We are archivists, but are we OK?’, Records Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 69–91, 2008, doi: 10.1108/09565690810858532.
[222]
J. McLeod and C. Hare, ‘Development of RMJ: A mirror of the development of the profession and discipline of records management’, Records Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 9–40, 2010, doi: 10.1108/09565691011036215.
[223]
S. Cline, ‘"Dust Clouds of Camels Shall Cover You”: Covenant and the Archival Endeavor’, American Archivist, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://americanarchivist.org/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.75.2.03193j1517858r34
[224]
E. Shepherd, ‘Pioneering women archivists in England: Ethel Stokes (1870–1944), record agent’, Archival Science, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 175–194, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10502-016-9272-x.
[225]
J. Lappin, ‘What will be the next records management orthodoxy?’, Records Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 252–264, 2010, doi: 10.1108/09565691011095283.
[226]
N. Ceeney, ‘The Role of a 21st-century National Archive—The Relevance of the Jenkinsonian Tradition, and a Redefinition for the Information Society’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 57–71, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.1080/00379810802499868.
[227]
E. Shepherd, Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780754681922
[228]
C. Gauld, ‘Democratising or privileging: the democratisation of knowledge and the role of the archivist’, Archival Science, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10502-015-9262-4.
[229]
S. Hall, ‘Constituting an archive’, Third Text, vol. 15, no. 54, pp. 89–92, Mar. 2001, doi: 10.1080/09528820108576903.
[230]
‘Against Precarity: Towards a Community-Based Notion of Fiscal Sustainability’. [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/community-archives/against-precarity-towards-a-community-based-notion-of-fiscal-sustainability-815d1d889309
[231]
A. Flinn, M. Stevens, and E. Shepherd, ‘Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream’, Archival Science, vol. 9, no. 1–2, pp. 71–86, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10502-009-9105-2.
[232]
A. Sexton and D. Sen, ‘More voice, less ventriloquism– exploring the relational dynamics in a participatory archive of mental health recovery’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 874–888, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1080/13527258.2017.1339109.
[233]
‘We Already Are - Sustainable Futures - Medium’. [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/community-archives/we-already-are-52438b863e31
[234]
A. Eveleigh, Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives, ICA Congress Brisbane 2012. 2012 [Online]. Available: http://ica2012.ica.org/files/pdf/Full%20papers%20upload/ica12Final00128.pdf
[235]
J. A. Bastian and A. Flinn, Eds., Community archives, community spaces: heritage, memory and identity. London: Facet Publishing, 2020.
[236]
S. Welland and A. Cossham, ‘Defining the undefinable: an analysis of definitions of community archives’, Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, vol. 68, no. 8/9, pp. 617–634, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1108/GKMC-04-2019-0049.
[237]
Flinn, A. and Stevens, M., ‘"It is noh mistri, wi mekin histri”. Telling Our Own Story: Independent and Community Archives in the United Kingdom, Challenging and Subverting the Mainstream’, in Community archives: the shaping of memory, vol. Principles and practice in records management and archives, London: Facet, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049047
[238]
J. Cole, J. Nolan, Y. Seko, K. Mancuso, and A. Ospina, ‘GimpGirl grows up: Women with disabilities rethinking, redefining, and reclaiming community’, New Media & Society, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1161–1179, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1177/1461444811398032.
[239]
K. EICHHORN, ‘D.I.Y. Collectors, Archiving Scholars, and Activist Librarians: Legitimizing Feminist Knowledge and Cultural Production Since 1990’, Women’s Studies, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 622–646, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1080/00497878.2010.490716.
[240]
A. J. Lau, A. J. Gilliland, and K. Anderson, ‘NATURALIZING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN INFORMATION STUDIES’, Information, Communication & Society, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 991–1015, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.630404.
[241]
Flinn, A., ‘The Impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice’, in The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader, London: Facet, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14509809360004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[242]
S. Baker and A. Huber, ‘Notes towards a typology of the DIY institution: Identifying do-it-yourself places of popular music preservation’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 513–530, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1367549413491721.
[243]
M. Caswell and S. Mallick, ‘Collecting the easily missed stories: digital participatory microhistory and the South Asian American Digital Archive’, Archives and Manuscripts, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 73–86, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1080/01576895.2014.880931.
[244]
Flinn, A., ‘Independent Community Archives and Community-Generated Content: “Writing, Saving and Sharing our Histories”’, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 39–51, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1177/1354856509347707.
[245]
M. Stevens, A. Flinn, and E. Shepherd, ‘New frameworks for community engagement in the archive sector: from handing over to handing on’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 16, no. 1–2, pp. 59–76, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1080/13527250903441770.
[246]
A. Gilliland and A. Flinn, ‘Community Archives: What are we really talking about?’, in Nexus, Confluence, and Difference: Community Archives meets Community Informatics: Prato CIRN Conference Oct 28-30 2013, [Online]. Available: http://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/920626/gilliland_flinn_keynote.pdf
[247]
Bastian, Jeannette Allis and Alexander, Ben, Community archives: the shaping of memory, vol. Principles and practice in records management and archives. London: Facet, 2009.
[248]
V. Gray, ‘“Who’s that Knocking on Our Door?”: Archives, Outreach and Community’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.1080/00379810802499652.
[249]
A. Flinn, ‘Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges1’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 151–176, Oct. 2007, doi: 10.1080/00379810701611936.
[250]
H. MacNeil and T. Eastwood, Eds., Currents of archival thinking, Second edition. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited, 2017 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
[251]
C. Cifor, Marika Michelle, ‘“To Suddenly Discover Yourself Existing”: Uncovering the Impact of Community Archives’, American Archivist, vol. 79, no. 1, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0nd5g0p7
[252]
Caswell, ML, ‘Seeing Yourself in History: Community Archives in the Fight Against Symbolic Annihilation’, The Public Historian: a journal of public history, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9gc14537#page-1
[253]
A. Flinn, ‘Chapter 8: The impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice’, in The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader, London: Facet, 2011, pp. 145–169 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f8a3983f-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[254]
M. Ramírez, ‘The Task of the Latino/a Archivist: On Archiving Identity and Community. Studies [eScholarship]’, InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 5(1), Article 3, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://escholarship.org/uc/gseis_interactions?volume=5;issue=1
[255]
I. Hopkins, ‘Places From Which to Speak’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 83–109, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.1080/00379810802515069.
[256]
D. Cooper, ‘House proud: an ethnography of the BC Gay and Lesbian Archives’, Archival Science, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10502-015-9250-8.
[257]
Bastian, Jeannette Allis and Alexander, Ben, Community archives: the shaping of memory, vol. Principles and practice in records management and archives. London: Facet, 2009.
[258]
S. McKemmish, ‘Evidence of me . . . (first published in Archives and Manucscripts, 24 (1) 1996.)’. .
[259]
H. Halilovich, ‘Reclaiming erased lives: archives, records and memories in post-war Bosnia and the Bosnian diaspora’, Archival Science, vol. 14, no. 3–4, pp. 231–247, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9227-z.
[260]
‘An argument for Archiving Facebook as a Heterogeneous Personal Store’. [Online]. Available: http://www.csdl.tamu.edu/~marshall/DL14-marshall-and-shipman.pdf
[261]
J. Leighton John, ‘Digital lives - an initial synthesis Version 0.1’. British Library, 2010.
[262]
‘Lost in Translation: Understanding the Possession of Digital Things in the Cloud’. [Online]. Available: http://willodom.com/publications/paper1202-odom.pdf
[263]
‘paradigm | workbook on digital private papers’. .
[264]
Catherine Hobbs, ‘The Character of Personal Archives: Reflections on the Value of Records of Individuals’, Archivaria, vol. 52, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12817/14028
[265]
‘Protocols for Native American Archival Materials’. .
[266]
‘ATSILIRN - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Library and Information Resource Network’. .
[267]
L. Iacovino, ‘Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities’, Archival Science, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 353–372, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3.
[268]
A. B. Krebs, ‘Native America’s twenty-first-century right to know’, Archival Science, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 173–190, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10502-011-9161-2.
[269]
T. Riley, ‘Prospects in First Nations Archives: Reflections based on my participation in the Tribal Archives, Libraries and Museums Institutes and Conference programs’. 2009 [Online]. Available: http://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/47975/1/Prospects%2520-%2520final.pdf
[270]
K. Thorpe, ‘Protocols for libraries and archives in Australia: incorporating Indigenous perspectives in the information field’, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://library.ifla.org/99/
[271]
L. Roy, C. Trace, and S. Gilbert, ‘Indigenous ways: assessing the awareness of and potential need for identifying content on indigenous world view in educating Libraries/Archives/Museum (LAM) entry level professionals’, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://library.ifla.org/108/
[272]
K. Christen, ‘Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation’, The American Archivist, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 185–210, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521.
[273]
A. J. Gilliland, ‘Moving past: probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia’, Archival Science, vol. 14, no. 3–4, pp. 249–274, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9231-3.
[274]
D. T. Hawkins, Personal archiving: preserving our digital heritage. Medford, N.J.: Information Today, Inc, 2013.
[275]
Riva A. Pollard, ‘The Appraisal of Personal Papers: A Critical Literature Review’, Archivaria, vol. 52, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12818/14030
[276]
Jennifer Meehan, ‘Rethinking Original Order and Personal Records’, Archivaria, vol. 70, pp. 27–44, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13294
[277]
Creighton Barrett, ‘Respect Which Fonds? Personal Archives and Family Businesses in Nova Scotia’, Archivaria, vol. 76, pp. 75–92, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13459
[278]
Amelia Acker, ‘Death, Memorialization, and Social Media: A Platform Perspective for Personal Archives’, Archivaria, vol. 77, pp. 1–23, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13469
[279]
Anna Chen, ‘Disorder: Vocabularies of Hoarding in Personal Digital Archiving Practices’, Archivaria, vol. 78, pp. 115–134, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13507
[280]
R. Johnston and K. Marwood, ‘Action heritage: research, communities, social justice’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 816–831, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1080/13527258.2017.1339111.
[281]
Runnymede Trust, ‘Finding Common Cause: building research collaborations between universities and Black and minority ethnic communities’. [Online]. Available: https://www.runnymedetrust.org/uploads/publications/Runnymede%20Common%20Cause%20briefing%20FINAL.pdf
[282]
K. Shilton and R. Srinivasan, ‘Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections’, 2007. .
[283]
Isto Huvila, ‘The Unbearable Lightness of Participating? Revisiting the discourses of ’participation’ in archival literature’. [Online]. Available: http://www.istohuvila.se/files/IstoHuvilaUnbearableLightnessPreprint.pdf
[284]
I. Huvila, ‘Participatory archive: towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualisation of records management’, Archival Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 15–36, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s10502-008-9071-0.
[285]
G. Rolan, ‘Agency in the archive: a model for participatory recordkeeping’, Archival Science, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 195–225, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10502-016-9267-7.
[286]
K. Theimer, ‘What Is the Meaning of Archives 2.0?’, The American Archivist, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 58–68, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.17723/aarc.74.1.h7tn4m4027407666.
[287]
E. Waterton and L. Smith, ‘The recognition and misrecognition of community heritage’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 16, no. 1–2, pp. 4–15, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1080/13527250903441671.
[288]
S. Anderson and R. Allen, ‘Envisioning the Archival Commons’, The American Archivist, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 383–400, Sep. 2009, doi: 10.17723/aarc.72.2.g54085061q586416.
[289]
Flinn, A. and Pick, G., ‘Diversifying and deomcratising archive collections - an agenda for transformation’, in Embedding shared heritage: the Heritage Diversity Task Force report, London: Greater London Authority, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.mla.gov.uk/what/programmes/renaissance/regions/london/News_and_Resources/~/media/London/Files/2009/Publications/Embedding%20Shared%20Heritage_LOW%20resolution.ashx
[290]
C. Lang et al., ‘COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS IN THE COMMUNITY’, Information, Communication & Society, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1081–1105, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.704061.
[291]
B. Battley, ‘Co-producing archival research with communication, reflexivity and friendship: crossing the three-wire bridge’, Archival Science, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 371–391, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10502-017-9279-y.
[292]
J. Newman, ‘Revisiting Archive Collections: Developing Models for Participatory Cataloguing’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 57–73, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1080/00379816.2012.666404.
[293]
A. Flinn and A. Sexton, ‘Research on community heritage: moving from collaborative research to participatory and co-designed practice’. [Online]. Available: https://studylib.net/doc/12864587/research-on-community-heritage--moving-from-collaborative
[294]
J. A. Bastian and A. Flinn, Eds., Community archives, community spaces: heritage, memory and identity. London: Facet Publishing, 2020.
[295]
‘No red lines: Industry defuses ethics guidelines for artificial intelligence – AlgorithmWatch’. [Online]. Available: https://algorithmwatch.org/en/industry-defuses-ethics-guidelines-for-artificial-intelligence/
[296]
National Audit Office, ‘Challenges in Using Data Across Government’. [Online]. Available: https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Challenges-in-using-data-across-government.pdf
[297]
V. L. Lemieux, ‘Trusting records: is Blockchain technology the answer?’, Records Management Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 110–139, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1108/RMJ-12-2015-0042.
[298]
E. Goudarouli, A. Sexton, and J. Sheridan, ‘The Challenge of the Digital and the Future Archive: Through the Lens of The National Archives UK’, Philosophy & Technology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 173–183, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s13347-018-0333-3.
[299]
D. Kirk and A. Sellen, ‘On Human Remains: Values and Practice in the Home Archiving of Cherished Objects’, Microsoft Research [Online]. Available: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/on-human-remains-value-and-practice-in-the-home-archiving-of-cherished-objects/
[300]
A. Irons, ‘Computer forensics and records management – compatible disciplines’, Records Management Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 102–112, May 2006, doi: 10.1108/09565690610677463.
[301]
‘Rethinking the Web as a Personal Archive’, Microsoft Research [Online]. Available: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/rethinking-the-web-as-a-personal-archive/
[302]
‘The Institute of Conservation Professional Standards in Conservation’. [Online]. Available: https://www.icon.org.uk/resources/resources-for-conservation-professionals/standards-and-ethics/icon-professional-standards.html
[303]
Michele V. Cloonan, ‘The Boundaries of Preservation and Conservation Research’, Libraries & the Cultural Record, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 220–229, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23053599?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[304]
Y. Kim and S. Ross, ‘Closing the loop: Assisting archival appraisal and information retrieval in one sweep’, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2013, doi: 10.1002/meet.14505001042.
[305]
R. Harvey and D. Thompson, ‘Automating the appraisal of digital materials’, Library Hi Tech, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 313–322, 2010, doi: 10.1108/07378831011047703.
[306]
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives, Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. London: Facet Publishing, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1424541&site=ehost-live&scope=site
[307]
J. Bunn, ‘Developing descriptive standards: a renewed call to action’, Archives and Records, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 235–247, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1080/23257962.2013.830066.
[308]
J. Niu, ‘Organisation and description of datasets’, Archives and Manuscripts, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 73–85, May 2016, doi: 10.1080/01576895.2016.1179585.
[309]
K. F. Gracy, ‘Archival description and linked data: a preliminary study of opportunities and implementation challenges’, Archival Science, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 239–294, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9216-2.
[310]
H. MacNeil, ‘What finding aids do: archival description as rhetorical genre in traditional and web-based environments’, Archival Science, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 485–500, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10502-012-9175-4.
[311]
P. Clough, J. Tang, M. M. Hall, and A. Warner, ‘Linking archival data to location: a case study at the UK National Archives’, Aslib Proceedings, vol. 63, no. 2/3, pp. 127–147, 2011, doi: 10.1108/00012531111135628.
[312]
G. Rolan, ‘Towards Archive 2.0: issues in archival systems interoperability’, Archives and Manuscripts, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 42–60, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1080/01576895.2014.959535.
[313]
‘When Archivists and Digital Asset Managers Collide: Tensions and Ways Forward | The American Archivist’. [Online]. Available: http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.121
[314]
R. Eito-Brun, ‘Context-based aggregation of archival data: the role of authority records in the semantic landscape’, Archival Science, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9215-3.
[315]
P. F. Marty, ‘An Introduction to Digital Convergence: Libraries, Archives, and Museums in the Information Age’, The Library Quarterly, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2010, doi: 10.1086/648549.
[316]
J. Niu, ‘Event-based archival information organization’, Archival Science, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9222-4.
[317]
J. Ray, ‘Sharks, digital curation, and the education of information professionals’, Museum Management and Curatorship, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 357–368, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1080/09647770903314720.
[318]
A. Cunningham, ‘Digital Curation/Digital Archiving: A View from the National Archives of Australia’, The American Archivist, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 530–543, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.17723/aarc.71.2.p0h0t68547385507.
[319]
S. Higgins, ‘Digital Curation: The Emergence of a New Discipline’, International Journal of Digital Curation, vol. 6, no. 2, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.191.
[320]
K. Timms, ‘New Partnerships for Old Sibling Rivals: The Development of Integrated Access Systems for the Holdings of Archives, Libraries and Museums’. [Online]. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13230/14549
[321]
C. Lee and H. Tibbo, ‘Where’s the Archivist in Digital Curation? Exploring the Possibities through a Matrix of Knowledge and Skills’. [Online]. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13362/14668
[322]
K. Cumming and C. Findlay, ‘Digital recordkeeping: are we at a tipping point?’, Records Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 265–278, 2010, doi: 10.1108/09565691011095292.
[323]
M. R. Kalfatovic, E. Kapsalis, K. P. Spiess, A. Camp, and M. Edson, ‘Smithsonian Team Flickr: a library, archives, and museums collaboration in web 2.0 space’, Archival Science, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 267–277, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s10502-009-9089-y.
[324]
‘Museum Management and Curatorship - Volume 24, Issue 4’. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rmmc20/24/4
[325]
C. Marsden, ‘Sectors and Domains: Some reflections on co-operation and integration’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 17–23, Apr. 2001, doi: 10.1080/00379810120037469.
[326]
H. Robinson, ‘Remembering things differently: museums, libraries and archives as memory institutions and the implications for convergence’, Museum Management and Curatorship, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 413–429, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1080/09647775.2012.720188.
[327]
‘Exploring Heritage in Participatory Culture: The MuseumApp | museumsandtheweb.com’. [Online]. Available: http://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2011/papers/exploring_heritage_in_participatory_culture_th
[328]
A. Strauss, ‘Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile’, Archival Science, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3.
[329]
A. J. Gilliland and H. Halilovich, ‘Migrating memories: transdisciplinary pedagogical approaches to teaching about diasporic memory, identity and human rights in archival studies’, Archival Science, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 79–96, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10502-016-9265-9.
[330]
P. Ricardo and C. Michelle, ‘Critical Directions for Archival Approaches to Social Justice’, The Library Quarterly [Online]. Available: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/684145
[331]
R. J. Matthews, ‘Is the archivist a "radical atheist” now? Deconstruction, its new wave, and archival activism’, Archival Science, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10502-015-9248-2.
[332]
B. Butler, ‘“Othering” the archive—from exile to inclusion and heritage dignity: the case of Palestinian archival memory’, Archival Science, vol. 9, no. 1–2, pp. 57–69, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10502-009-9095-0.
[333]
Susan Pell, ‘Radicalizing the Politics of the Archive: An Ethnographic Reading of an Activist Archive’, Archivaria, vol. 80, pp. 33–57, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13543/14896
[334]
A. Flinn and B. Alexander, ‘"Humanizing an inevitability political craft”: Introduction to the special issue on archiving activism and activist archiving’, Archival Science, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 329–335, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10502-015-9260-6.
[335]
J. Evans, S. McKemmish, E. Daniels, and G. McCarthy, ‘Self-determination and archival autonomy: advocating activism’, Archival Science, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 337–368, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10502-015-9244-6.
[336]
Jimerson, Randall C. and Society of American Archivists, Archives power: memory, accountability, and social justice. Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 2009.
[337]
D. K. Wakimoto, C. Bruce, and H. Partridge, ‘Archivist as activist: lessons from three queer community archives in California’, Archival Science, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 293–316, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10502-013-9201-1.
[338]
A. Flinn, ‘Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions [eScholarship]’, interActions UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, 2011.
[339]
A. Sellie, J. Goldstein, M. Fair, and J. Hoyer, ‘Interference Archive: a free space for social movement culture’, Archival Science, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 453–472, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10502-015-9245-5.
[340]
Gilliland, Anne J, ‘The Role of Participatory Archives in Furthering Human Rights, Reconciliation and Recovery’, Atlanti: Review for Modern Archival Theory and Practice, vol. 24 [Online]. Available: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/346521tf
[341]
S. Yaco and B. B. Hardy, ‘Historians, archivists, and social activism: benefits and costs’, Archival Science, vol. 13, no. 2–3, pp. 253–272, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10502-012-9187-0.
[342]
A. Buchanan and M. Bastian, ‘Activating the archive: rethinking the role of traditional archives for local activist projects’, Archival Science, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 429–451, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10502-015-9247-3.
[343]
S. Wood, K. Carbone, M. Cifor, A. Gilliland, and R. Punzalan, ‘Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights’, Archival Science, vol. 14, no. 3–4, pp. 397–419, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9233-1.
[344]
M. Caswell, ‘Defining human rights archives: introduction to the special double issue on archives and human rights’, Archival Science, vol. 14, no. 3–4, pp. 207–213, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9226-0.
[345]
J. M. Schwartz and T. Cook, ‘Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory’, Archival Science, vol. 2, no. 1–2, pp. 1–19, Mar. 2002, doi: 10.1007/BF02435628.
[346]
V. Harris, ‘The archival sliver: Power, memory, and archives in South Africa’, Archival Science, vol. 2, no. 1–2, pp. 63–86, Mar. 2002, doi: 10.1007/BF02435631.
[347]
A. Sachs, ‘Archives, Truth, and Reconciliation’, Archivaria, vol. 62, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12887/14118
[348]
Hamilton, Carolyn, Refiguring the archive. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2002.
[349]
K. Cumming and A. Picot, ‘Reinventing appraisal’, Archives and Manuscripts, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 133–145, May 2014, doi: 10.1080/01576895.2014.926824.
[350]
T. R. Schellenberg, ‘The Appraisal of Modern Records’. .
[351]
‘The National Archives Appraisal Policy Background Paper - The “Grigg System” and Beyond’. .
[352]
T. Cook, ‘Macroappraisal in Theory and Practice: Origins, Characteristics, and Implementation in Canada, 1950–2000’, Archival Science, vol. 5, no. 2–4, pp. 101–161, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.1007/s10502-005-9010-2.
[353]
‘Significance 2.0: a guide to assessing the significance of collections - significance-2.0.pdf’. [Online]. Available: https://www.arts.gov.au/what-we-do/museums-libraries-and-galleries/significance-20
[354]
H. Booms, ‘Society and the Formation of a Documentary Heritage: Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources’, 1987. .
[355]
T. Abraham, ‘Collection Policy or Documentation Strategy: Theory and Practice’, The American Archivist, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 44–52, Jan. 1991, doi: 10.17723/aarc.54.1.v2323483077xr227.
[356]
R. Cox, ‘The Documentation Strategy and Archival Appraisal Principles: A Different Perspective’. .
[357]
F. Boles and J. Young, ‘Exploring the Black Box: The Appraisal of University Administrative Records’, The American Archivist, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 121–140, Apr. 1985, doi: 10.17723/aarc.48.2.1414g624328868vw.
[358]
C. Bailey, ‘Past Imperfect? Reflections on the Evolution of Canadian Federal Government Records Appraisal’ [Online]. Available: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13432/14742
[359]
P. Hohmann, ‘On Impartiality and Interrelatedness: Reactions to Jenkinsonian Appraisal in the Twentieth Century’, The American Archivist, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 14–25, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.14.
[360]
Timothy. Wisniewski, ‘Framers of the Kept: Against the Grain Appraisal of Ephemeral Moving Images’, The Moving Image, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–24, 2008, doi: 10.1353/mov.2008.0002.
[361]
Cynthia K. Sauer, ‘Doing the Best We Can? The Use of Collection Development Policies and Cooperative Collecting Activities at Manuscript Repositories’, The American Archivist, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 308–349, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/40294175?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Doing&searchText=the&searchText=best&searchText=we&searchText=can?&searchText=The&searchText=use&searchText=of&searchText=collection&searchText=development&searchText=policies&searchText=and&searchText=cooperative&searchText=collecting&searchText=activities&searchText=at&searchText=manuscript&searchText=repositories&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DDoing%2Bthe%2Bbest%2Bwe%2Bcan%253F%2BThe%2Buse%2Bof%2Bcollection%2Bdevelopment%2Bpolicies%2Band%2Bcooperative%2Bcollecting%2Bactivities%2Bat%2Bmanuscript%2Brepositories%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj50000557%26amp%3BSearch%3DSearch%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3BglobalSearch%3D%26amp%3BsbbBox%3D%26amp%3BsbjBox%3D%26amp%3BsbpBox%3D
[362]
L. Mancuso, ‘Archival appraisal in Brazil’, Archives and Manuscripts, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 146–159, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1080/01576895.2013.801101.
[363]
R. Kretzschmar, ‘Archival Appraisal in Germany: A Decade of Theory, Strategies, and Practices’, Archival Science, vol. 5, no. 2–4, pp. 219–238, Jul. 2006, doi: 10.1007/s10502-005-9014-y.
[364]
I. Taylor, ‘The German appraisal discussion since 1990: an overview’, Archives and Manuscripts, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 14–23, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/01576895.2015.1136226.
[365]
M. Cook, ‘Appraisal and access: We should expect changes driven by the media and by public awareness’, Records Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 72–77, 2010, doi: 10.1108/09565691011039843.
[366]
T. Eastwood, ‘Reflections on the Goal of Archival Appraisal in Demoncratic Societies’. .
[367]
N. FORTIER, ‘Transparency, Compliance, and Accountability: Developing a Knowledge Infrastructure for Macroappraisal at Library and Archives Canada’, Archival Science, vol. 5, no. 2–4, pp. 343–360, Dec. 2005, doi: 10.1007/s10502-005-9005-z.
[368]
‘The National Geospatial Digital Archives—Collection Development: Lessons Learned’, Library Trends, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 490–515, 2009, doi: 10.1353/lib.0.0049.
[369]
C. Carvalho, ‘Appraisal based on organic functional analysis: a case study in an electronic records environment’, Records Management Journal, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 175–205, 2001, doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000007274.
[370]
F. Sims, ‘A new appraisal approach for English Heritage’, Records Management Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 8–13, 2002, doi: 10.1108/09565690210427743.
[371]
R. Tschan, ‘A Comparison of Jenkinson and Schellenberg on Appraisal’, The American Archivist, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 176–195, Sep. 2002, doi: 10.17723/aarc.65.2.920w65g3217706l1.
[372]
Cox, Richard J., No innocent deposits: forming archives by rethinking appraisal. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press, 2004.
[373]
P. B. Arias, ‘Appraising the value of statistical records of the European Central Bank for retention scheduling purposes’, Records Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 205–220, 2008, doi: 10.1108/09565690810916456.
[374]
A. E. M. Jonker, ‘No Privileged Past—Acquisition Revisited’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 67–80, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1080/00379810903264625.
[375]
Cook, Terry and Samuels, Helen Willa, Controlling the past: documenting society and institutions : essays in honor of Helen Willa Samuels. Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 2011.
[376]
Boles, Frank, Selecting & appraising archives & manuscripts, vol. Archival fundamentals series. Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 2005.
[377]
H. Samuels, ‘Improving our disposition: documentation strategy’, Archivaria, vol. 33, 1991.
[378]
Craig, Barbara Lazenby, Archival appraisal: theory and practice. München: K.G. Saur, 2004.
[379]
M. SCOTT, ‘Functional appraisal of records: a methodology’, Records Management Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 101–114, 1997, doi: 10.1108/eb027107.
[380]
R. Cox and H. Samuels, ‘The Archivist’s First Responsibility: A Research Agenda to Improve the Identification and Retention of Records of Enduring Value’, The American Archivist, vol. 51, no. 1–2, pp. 28–42, Jan. 1988, doi: 10.17723/aarc.51.1-2.gkw67424l3344ug8.
[381]
P. Alexander and H. Samuels, ‘The Roots of 128: A Hypothetical Documentation Strategy’, The American Archivist, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 518–531, Oct. 1987, doi: 10.17723/aarc.50.4.v889q1182r11p36u.
[382]
E. Honer and S. Graham, ‘Should Users Have a Role in Determining the Future Archive? The Approach Adopted by the Public Record Office, the UK National Archive, to the Selection of Records for Permanent Preservation | Honer | LIBER Quarterly’. .
[383]
H. MacNeil and T. Eastwood, Eds., Currents of archival thinking, Second edition. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited, 2017 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
