1.
Caswell, ML: "’The Archive’ Is Not an Archives: On Acknowledging the Intellectual Contributions of Archival Studies”, https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7bn4v1fk.
2.
BS ISO 15489-1:2016 Information and documentation. Records management. Concepts and principles. BSI (2016).
3.
Sue McKemmish: Traces: Document, record, archive, archives. In: Archives: recordkeeping in society. pp. 1–20. Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, N.S.W. (2005).
4.
Yeo, G.: Concepts of Record (1): Evidence, Information, and Persistent Representations. The American Archivist. 70, 315–343 (2007). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.70.2.u327764v1036756q.
5.
Schellenberg, T. R.: Modern archives: principles and techniques. F.W. Cheshire, Melbourne (1956).
6.
MacNeil, H., Eastwood, T. eds: Currents of archival thinking. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, California (2017).
7.
Jenkinson, Hilary, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: Manual of archive administration. (1922).
8.
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives: Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. Facet Publishing, London (2016).
9.
Rekrut, A.: Matters of substance: materiality and meaning in historical records and their digital images. Archives and Manuscripts. 42, 238–247 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.958865.
10.
Smit, F. ed: Archives in Liquid Times. Dutch Society for Archival Publications (S@P) (2017).
11.
Dever, M.: Photographs and manuscripts: working in the archive. Archives and Manuscripts. 42, 282–294 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.956322.
12.
Acker, A.: How cells became records: standardization and infrastructure in tissue culture. Archival Science. 15, 1–24 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9213-x.
13.
Gilliland, A.J., Caswell, M.: Records and their imaginaries: imagining the impossible, making possible the imagined. Archival Science. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9259-z.
14.
Upward, F.: Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond: a personal reflection. Records Management Journal. 10, 115–139 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007259.
15.
Yeo, G.: Concepts of Record (2): Prototypes and Boundary Objects. The American Archivist. 71, 118–143 (2008). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.71.1.p0675v40tr14q6w2.
16.
InterPARES 3 Intellectual Framework.
17.
Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record: The concept of record: report from the second Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record, 30-31 May 1996. Riksarkivet, [Stockholm] (1998).
18.
Wooldridge, J.M.: Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, Ohio (2013).
19.
Duranti, Luciana, Thibodeau, Kenneth: The Concept of Record in Interactive, Experiential and Dynamic Environments: the View of InterPARES*. Archival Science. 6, 13–68 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-006-9021-7.
20.
Atherton, Jay: From Life Cycle to Continuum: Some Thoughts on the Records Management - Archives Relationship. Archiviria. (1985).
21.
Kahle, B.: Universal Access to All Knowledge. The American Archivist. 70, 23–31 (2007). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.70.1.u114006770252845.
22.
Craven, Louise: What are archives?: cultural and theoretical perspectives : a reader. Ashgate, Aldershot (2008).
23.
Duranti, Luciana, Preston, Randy, InterPARES Project, Associazione nazionale archivistica italiana: International reseach on permanent authentic records in electronic systems (InterPARES) 2: Experimental, interactive and dynamic records. CLEUP, Padova (2008).
24.
Heather, M.: Conceptualizing an Authentic Electronic Record, (2000).
25.
McKemmish, Sue, Piggott, Michael, Australia: The Records continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives first fifty years. Ancora Press in association with Australian Archives, Clayton (1994).
26.
Sue, M.: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: A Continuum of Responsibility (Information Technology).
27.
Schwartz, J.M., Cook, T.: Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science. 2, 1–19 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435628.
28.
Trace, C.B.: What is recorded is never simply ‘what happened’: Record keeping in modern organizational culture. Archival Science. 2, 137–159 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435634.
29.
Upward, Frank: Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties.
30.
Upward, Frank: Structuring the Records Continuum, Part Two: Structuration Theory and Recordkeeping.
31.
InterPARES 1 Template for Analysis.
32.
Yeo, G.: Rising to the level of a record? Some thoughts on records and documents. Records Management Journal. 21, 8–27 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111125071.
33.
Yeo, G.: ‘Nothing is the same as something else’: significant properties and notions of identity and originality. Archival Science. 10, 85–116 (2010).
34.
Frank Upward: Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology).
35.
Ketelaar, E.: Cultivating archives: meanings and identities. Archival Science. 12, 19–33 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9142-5.
36.
Cumming, K.: Ways of seeing: contextualising the continuum. Records Management Journal. 20, 41–52 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011036224.
37.
MacNeil, H., Eastwood, T. eds: Currents of archival thinking. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, California (2017).
38.
Ngoepe, M., Makhubela, S.: "Justice delayed is justice denied”. Records Management Journal. 25, 288–305 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-06-2015-0023.
39.
Lemieux, V.L.: The records-risk nexus: exploring the relationship between records and risk. Records Management Journal. 20, 199–216 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011064331.
40.
Dirks, J.: Accountability, History, and Archives: Conflicting Priorities or Synthesized Strands? Archivaria. 57, (2004).
41.
Birkinshaw, P.: Freedom of information and its impact in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly. 27, 312–321 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.006.
42.
Longmore, B.: The Public Records (Scotland) Act 2011: creating a culture that values public records. Archives and Records. 34, 248–262 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2013.830067.
43.
Worthy, B., Hazell, R.: Disruptive, Dynamic and Democratic? Ten Years of FOI in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs. 70, 22–42 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv069.
44.
Moss, M.: The Hutton Inquiry, the President of Nigeria and What the Butler Hoped to See. The English Historical Review. 120, 577–592 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei121.
45.
Thurston, A.: Integrity in government through records management: essays in honour of Anne Thurston. Ashgate, Farnham, Surrey, England (2014).
46.
‘Say nothing’: silenced records and the Boston College subpoenas.
47.
Henttonen, P.: Privacy as an archival problem and a solution. Archival Science. 17, 285–303 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-017-9277-0.
48.
Shepherd, E.: Freedom of Information, Right to Access Information, Open Data: Who is at the Table? The Round Table. 104, 715–726 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2015.1112101.
49.
Duchein, M.: The History of European Archives and the Development of the Archival Profession in Europe. The American Archivist. 55, 14–25 (1992). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.55.1.k17n44g856577888.
50.
WORTHY, B.: More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government. Governance. 23, 561–582 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.x.
51.
Birkinshaw, P.: Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
52.
Birkinshaw, P.: Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation. Tottel, Haywards Heath (2005).
53.
Legislation and regulations | The National Archives, http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/legislation/.
54.
Wallace, David A., Cox, Richard J.: Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. Quorum Books, London (2002).
55.
MacNeil, Heather, Eastwood, Terry: Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Libraries Unlimited, Oxford (2010).
56.
Shepherd, E., Stevenson, A., Flinn, A.: The Impact of Freedom of Information on Records Management and Record Use in Local Government: A Literature Review. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 30, 227–248 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810903445000.
57.
Shepherd, E.: Freedom of Information and Records Management in the UK: What has been the Impact? Journal of the Society of Archivists. 28, 125–138 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701607736.
58.
Holmlund, Mona, Avery, Cheryl: Better off forgetting?: essays on archives, public policy, and collective memory. University of Toronto Press, London (2010).
59.
McLeod, J.: Thoughts on the opportunities for records professionals of the open access, open data agenda. Records Management Journal. 22, 92–97 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691211268711.
60.
Shepherd, E., Stevenson, A., Flinn, A.: Records management in English local government: the effect of freedom of information. Records Management Journal. 21, 122–134 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111152053.
61.
McKemmish, S., Faulkhead, S., Russell, L.: Distrust in the archive: reconciling records. Archival Science. 11, 211–239 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9153-2.
62.
Tough, A.: Accountability, open government and record keeping: time to think again? Records Management Journal. 21, 225–236 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111186894.
63.
Birkinshaw, P.: Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation. Tottel, Haywards Heath (2005).
64.
Birkinshaw, P.: Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
65.
Interview with Dr Anne Thurston on Open Government and trustworthy records | Gov 2.0 Radio.
66.
Wallace, David A., Cox, Richard J.: Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. Quorum Books, London (2002).
67.
Meijer, A.: Accountability in an Information Age: Opportunities and Risks for Records Management - ProQuest.
68.
Jimerson, R.C.: Ripples across the pond: global implications of the Heiner Affair. 39, (2011).
69.
Hurley, C.: Archivists and Accountability. 34, (2006).
70.
McKemmish, Sue, Charles Sturt University: Archives: recordkeeping in society. Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, N.S.W. (2005).
71.
Wamukoya, J.: Records and archives as a basis for good government: implications and challenges for records managers and archivists in Africa. Records Management Journal. 10, 23–33 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007254.
72.
Cox, Richard J.: Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world. Facet, London (2006).
73.
Caron, D.J., Kellerhals, A.: Supporting Democratic Values Through a Relevant Documentary Foundation - An Evolutionary Complex.
74.
Public Sector Information | Europa - Information Society.
75.
Hurley, C.: Recordkeeping, Document Destruction and the Law (Heiner, Enron and McCabe). 30, (2002).
76.
Council of Europe: Access to official documents Recommendation Rec (2002) 2 of the Committee of Ministers and explanatory memorandum, (2003).
77.
Open Government Data | Open Knowledge Foundation Blog. https://doi.org/[object Object].
78.
Valge, J., Kibal, B.: Restrictions on Access to Archives and Records in Europe: A History and the Current Situation. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 28, 193–214 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701611951.
79.
Council of Europe - Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents (CETS No. 205).
80.
The National Archives: The United Kingdom Report on the Re-use of Public Sector Information.
81.
Critical Archival Studies: An Introduction | Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.50.
82.
L, Hughes-Watkins: Moving Toward a Reparative Archive: A Roadmap for a Holistic Approach to Disrupting Homogenous Histories in Academic Repositories and Creating Inclusive Spaces for Marginalized Voices.
83.
Sachs, Albie: Archives, Truth, and Reconciliation. Archivaria. 1–14.
84.
Harris, V.: Antonyms of our remembering. Archival Science. 14, 215–229 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9221-5.
85.
Archival Amnesty: In Search of Black American Transitional and Restorative Justice | Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.42.
86.
We Already Are - Sustainable Futures - Medium, https://medium.com/community-archives/we-already-are-52438b863e31.
87.
Cifor, M.: Affecting relations: introducing affect theory to archival discourse. Archival Science. 16, 7–31 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9261-5.
88.
An Archive of Feelings: Trauma, Sexuality, and Lesbian Public Cultures | Books Gateway | Duke University Press.
89.
Russell, L.: Affect in the archive: trauma, grief, delight and texts. Some personal reflections. Archives and Manuscripts. 46, 200–207 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2018.1458324.
90.
N, Laurent, M, Hart: Emotional Labour and Archival Practice: Reflection, http://www.ncarchivists.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/jsnca_vol15_laurent-hart-1.pdf.
91.
Gilliland, A.J., Caswell, M.: Records and their imaginaries: imagining the impossible, making possible the imagined. Archival Science. 16, 53–75 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9259-z.
92.
Wilson, J.Z., Golding, F.: Latent scrutiny: personal archives as perpetual mementos of the official gaze. Archival Science. 16, 93–109 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9255-3.
93.
Sloan, K., Vanderfluit, J., Douglas, J.: Not ‘Just my Problem to Handle’: Emerging Themes on Secondary Trauma and Archivists.
94.
Duff, W.M., Flinn, A., Suurtamm, K.E., Wallace, D.A.: Social justice impact of archives: a preliminary investigation. Archival Science. 13, 317–348 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9198-x.
95.
Dunbar, A.W.: Introducing critical race theory to archival discourse: getting the conversation started. Archival Science. 6, 109–129 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-006-9022-6.
96.
Confronting Our Failure of Care Around the Legacies of Marginalized People in the Archives, https://medium.com/on-archivy/confronting-our-failure-of-care-around-the-legacies-of-marginalized-people-in-the-archives-dc4180397280.
97.
Gilliland, A.: Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twenty-first century. Archival Science. 11, 193–209 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9147-0.
98.
Greene, Mark A.: A Critique of Social Justice as an Archival Imperative: What Is It We’re Doing That’s All That Important? The American Archivist. 76, 302–334 (2012).
99.
Jimerson, R.: Archivists and Social Responsibility: A Response to Mark Greene. The American Archivist. 76, 335–345 (2013). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.76.2.2627p15350572t21.
100.
Caswell, M.: Not Just Between Us: A Riposte to Mark Greene / Letter to the Editor. American Archivist. 76, (2013).
101.
Ramirez, M.: Being Assumed Not to Be: A Critique of Whiteness as an Archival Imperative | The American Archivist.
102.
Ishmael, H.J.M.: Reclaiming history: Arthur Schomburg. Archives and Manuscripts. 46, 269–288 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2018.1559741.
103.
Critical Archival Studies: An Introduction | Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.50.
104.
Ramirez, M.: Being Assumed Not to Be: A Critique of Whiteness as an Archival Imperative | The American Archivist.
105.
Brilmyer, G.: Center for the Study of Women | Why Disability Studies for Archives? | Center for the Study of Women, https://csw.ucla.edu/2018/07/13/why-disability-studies-for-archives/.
106.
Schlesselman-Tarango, G.: The Legacy of Lady Bountiful: White Women in the Library. Library Trends. 64, 667–686 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2016.0015.
107.
Identifying and Dismantling White Supremacy in Archives, http://www.gracenbrilmyer.com/dismantling_whiteSupremacy_archives3.pdf.
108.
Goudarouli, E., Sexton, A., Sheridan, J.: The Challenge of the Digital and the Future Archive: Through the Lens of The National Archives UK. Philosophy & Technology. 32, 173–183 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0333-3.
109.
Duranti, L.: Whose truth? Records and archives as evidence in the era of post-truth and disinformation. In: Brown, C. (ed.) Archival Futures. pp. 19–32. Facet (2018). https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783302192.003.
110.
How Archivists Could Stop Deepfakes From Rewriting History, https://gizmodo.com/how-archivists-could-stop-deepfakes-from-rewriting-hist-1829666009.
111.
Robertson, T.: digitization: just because you can, doesn’t mean you should – tara robertson, http://tararobertson.ca/2016/oob/.
112.
Noble, S.U.: Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press, New York (2018).
113.
Sutherland, T.: The Carceral Archive: Documentary Records, Narrative Construction, and Predictive Risk Assessment « CA: Journal of Cultural Analytics.
114.
S. L. Ziegler: Digitization Selection Criteria as Anti-Racist Action. Code4Lib Journal.
115.
Cook, T.: ‘We Are What We Keep; We Keep What We Are’: Archival Appraisal Past, Present and Future. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 32, 173–189 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2011.619688.
116.
Anne, G.: The Archival Paradigm: The Genesis and Rationales of Archival Principles and Practices: Council on Library and Information Resources, http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub89/archival.html.
117.
Thethi, J.: Archives and Inclusivity: Respectful descriptions of marginalised groups. – Intersectional GLAM, https://intersectionalglam.home.blog/2018/11/22/archives-and-inclusivity-respectful-descriptions-of-marginalised-groups/.
118.
Wright, K.: Archival interventions and the language we use. Archival Science. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09306-y.
119.
Mortensen, P.: The Place of Theory in Archival Practice.
120.
Lager Vestberg, N.: Archival Value. Photographies. 1, 49–65 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/17540760701786725.
121.
International Council on Archives: Statement of Principles Regarding Archival Description. Archivaria. 1, (1992).
122.
Cook, Terry: What is Past is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas Since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift. Archiviaria. 17–63 (1997).
123.
Groth, P., Gil, Y., Cheney, J., Miles, S.: Requirements for Provenance on the Web. International Journal of Digital Curation. 7, (2012). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.213.
124.
Duranti, L.: From Digital Diplomatics to Digital Records Forensics, http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13229/14548.
125.
Millar, L.: The Death of the Fonds and the Resurrection of Provenance: Archival Context in Space and Time.
126.
MacNeil, H.: Providing Grounds for Trust II: The Findings of the Authenticty Task Force of InterPARES.
127.
Ketelaar, E.: Archival Theory and the Dutch Manual.
128.
Cook, Terry: The Concept of the Archival Fonds in the Post-Custodial Era: Theory, Problems and Solutions. Archivaria. 35, (1993).
129.
Muller, Samuel, Feith, Johan Adriaan, Fruin, R., Vereniging van Archivarissen in Nederland: Manual for the arrangement and description of archives. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2003).
130.
Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance, Sweden: The principle of provenance: report from the First Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance 2-3 September 1993. Swedish National Archives, [Stockholm] (1994).
131.
Brothman, B.: Orders of Value: Probing the Theoretical Terms of Archival Practice.
132.
Duranti, L.: Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 1.
133.
Duranti, L.: Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 2.
134.
Duranti, L.: Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 3.
135.
Duranti, L.: Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 4.
136.
Duranti, L.: Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 5.
137.
Duranti, Luciana: Diplomatics: new uses for an old science. Scarecrow Press, Lanham, Md (1998).
138.
Duranti, L.: Reliability and Authenticity: The Concepts and Their Implications.
139.
Duranti, L., MacNeil, H.: The Protection of the Integrity of Electronic Records: An Overview of the UBC-MAS Research Project.
140.
Eastwood, T.: Nailing a Little Jelly to the Wall of Archival Studies.
141.
Eastwood, T.: What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important?
142.
Horsman, P.: The Last Dance of the Phoenix, or the De-discovery of the Archival Fonds.
143.
MacNeil, H.: Archival Theory and Practice: Between Two Paradigms.
144.
Nesmith, T.: Still Fuzzy, But More Accurate: Some Thoughts on the ‘Ghosts’ of Archival Theory.
145.
Ridener, John: From Polders to postmodernism: a concise history of archival theory. Litwin Books, Duluth, Minn (2009).
146.
Roberts, J.: Practice Makes Perfect, Theory Makes Theorists.
147.
Roberts, J.: What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important? Response to Terry Eastwood’s Paper.
148.
Duranti, L.: Concepts and principles for the management of electronic records, or records management theory is archival diplomatics. Records Management Journal. 20, 78–95 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011039852.
149.
Mak, B.: On the Uses of Authenticity.
150.
Geoffrey Yeo: The Conceptual Fonds and the Physical Collection.
151.
Yeo, G.: Bringing Things Together: Aggregate Records in a Digital Age.
152.
Zhang, J.: Original Order in Digital Archives.
153.
Duranti, L.: Origin and Development of the Concept of Archival Description | Duranti | Archivaria. Archivaria. 35, (1992).
154.
O’Meara, E., Tuomala, M.: Finding Balance between Archival Principles and Real-Life Practices in an Institutional Repository.
155.
Fear, K., Donaldson, D.R.: Provenance and credibility in scientific data repositories. Archival Science. 12, 319–339 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9172-7.
156.
Williams, C.: Studying Reality: The Application of Theory in an Aspect of UK Practice.
157.
Bazerman, C.: The orders of documents, the orders of activity, and the orders of information. Archival Science. 12, 377–388 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9178-1.
158.
Bunn, J.: Questioning autonomy: an alternative perspective on the principles which govern archival description. Archival Science. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9200-2.
159.
Findlay, C.: Archival activism. Archives and Manuscripts. 44, 155–159 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2016.1263964.
160.
Cook, T.: Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms. Archival Science. 13, 95–120 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7.
161.
Bastian, J.: Taking Custody, Giving Access: A Postcustodial Role for a New Century. Archivaria. (2002).
162.
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives: Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. Facet Publishing, London (2016).
163.
ARMA Information Governance Professional Code of Ethics, https://www.arma.org/page/IGP_Ethics.
164.
Archives and Records Association Code of Ethics, https://www.archives.org.uk/ara-code-of-ethics.
165.
Caswell, M.: On archival pluralism: what religious pluralism (and its critics) can teach us about archives.
166.
McKemmish, S., Gililand, A.J., Lau, A. eds: Research in the archival multiverse. Monash University Publishing, Clayton, Victoria, Australia (2017).
167.
McKemmish, S., Piggott, M.: Toward the Archival Multiverse: Challenging the Binary Opposition of the Personal and Corporate Archive in Modern Archival Theory and Practice. Archivaria. 76, (2013).
168.
Cox, Richard J: Rethinking Archival Ethics. Journal of Information Ethics. 22, 13–20.
169.
Neazor, M.: Recordkeeping Professional Ethics and their Application. (2007).
170.
Jimerson, R.C.: Ethical Concerns for Archivists. The Public Historian. 28, 87–92 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2006.28.1.87.
171.
Dingwall, G.: Trusting Archivists: The Role of Archival Ethics Codes in Establishing Public Faith. The American Archivist. 67, 11–30 (2004). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.67.1.mw0914r2p52xx2t4.
172.
Gale, C.: Record-keeping as an ethical imperative. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 27, 17–27 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/00039810600691221.
173.
Benedict, Karen M., Society of American Archivists: Ethics and the archival profession: introduction and case studies. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2003).
174.
Cook, M.: Professional ethics and practice in archives and records management in a human rights context ∗. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 27, 1–15 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/00039810600691205.
175.
Danielson, Elena S.: The ethical archivist. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2010).
176.
Cox, Richard J.: Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world. Facet, London (2006).
177.
Menne-Haritz, A.: Access — The reformulation of an archival paradigm. Archival Science. 1, 57–82 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435639.
178.
Vukliš, V: Archival Activism: Emerging Forms, Local Applications.
179.
Jenkinson, H.: A manual of archive administration. Lund, Humphries (1965).
180.
Schellenberg, T. R.: Modern archives: principles and techniques. F.W. Cheshire, Melbourne (1956).
181.
Cook, T.: Fashionable Nonsense or Professional Rebirth: Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives. Archivaria. 51, (2001).
182.
Cook, T.: Electronic Records, Paper Minds: The Revolution in Information Management and Archives in the Post-Custodial and Post-Modernist Era. Archives & Social Studies. (2007).
183.
Brothman, B.: Declining Derrida: Integrity, Tensegrity, and the Preservation of Archives from Deconstruction. Archivaria. 48, (1999).
184.
Bastian, J.: A Question of Custody: The Colonial Archives of the United States Virgin Islands. The American Archivist. 64, 96–114 (2001). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.64.1.h6k872252u2gr377.
185.
MacNeil, H.: Trusting Records in a Postmodern World. Archivaria. 51, (2001).
186.
Tom Nesmith: Seeing Archives: Postmodernism and the Changing Intellectual Place of Archives. American Archivist. 65, (2002).
187.
Ham, G.: Archival Strategies for the Post-Custodial Era. The American Archivist. 44–3, (1981).
188.
Harris, V.: Claiming Less, Delivering More: A Critique of Positivist Formulations on Archives in South Africa. Archivaria. 44, (1997).
189.
Derrida, Jacques, Prenowitz, Eric: Archive fever: a Freudian impression. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1996).
190.
Cook, T.: Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts. Archival Science. 1, 3–24 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435636.
191.
Cook, T., Schwartz, J.M.: Archives, records, and power: From (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance. Archival Science. 2, 171–185 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435620.
192.
Reed, B.: Reinventing access. Archives and Manuscripts. 42, 123–132 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.926823.
193.
Vilar, P., Sauperl, A.: Archives, Quo Vadis et Cum Quibus?: Archivists’ self-perceptions and perceptions of users of contemporary archives. International Journal of Information Management. 35, 551–560 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.06.001.
194.
Flanagan, M., Carini, P.: How Games Can Help Us Access and Understand Archival Images. The American Archivist. 75, 514–537 (2012). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.75.2.b424537w27970gu4.
195.
Duff, W., Johnson, C.: Where Is the List with All the Names? Information-Seeking Behavior of Genealogists. The American Archivist. 66, 79–95 (2003). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.66.1.l375uj047224737n.
196.
Prom, C.: Using Web Analytics to Improve Online Access to Archival Resources. The American Archivist. 74, 158–184 (2011). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.h56018515230417v.
197.
Fear, K.: User Understanding of Metadata in Digital Image Collections: Or, What Exactly Do You Mean by ‘Coverage’? The American Archivist. 73, 26–60 (2010). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.73.1.j00044lr77415551.
198.
Daniels, M., Yakel, E.: Seek and You May Find: Successful Search in Online Finding Aid Systems. The American Archivist. 73, 535–568 (2010). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.73.2.p578900680650357.
199.
Altman, B., Nemmers, J.: The Usability of On-line Archival Resources: The Polaris Project Finding Aid. The American Archivist. 64, 121–131 (2001). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.64.1.80300272655rqu74.
200.
Yakel, E., Bost, L.L.: Understanding Administrative Use and Users in University Archives - American Archivist - Volume 57, Number 4 / Fall 1994 - Society of American Archivists. The American Archivist.
201.
Yakel, E., Torres, D.: AI: Archival Intelligence and User Expertise. The American Archivist. 66, 51–78 (2003). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.66.1.q022h85pn51n5800.
202.
The Guide to Researching Audiences.
203.
Daines, J.G., Nimer, C.L.: Re-Imagining Archival Display: Creating User-Friendly Finding Aids. Journal of Archival Organization. 9, 4–31 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2011.574019.
204.
Sexton, A., Turner, C., Yeo, G., Hockey, S.: Understanding users: a prerequisite for developing new technologies. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 25, 33–49 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/0037981042000199133.
205.
Chapman, A.: Collection-level description: Joining up the domains. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 25, 149–155 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/0037981042000271475.
206.
Hill, A.: Serving the invisible researcher: Meeting the needs of online users. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 25, 139–148 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/0037981042000271466.
207.
Lowry, J.: Radical empathy, the imaginary and affect in (post)colonial records: how to break out of international stalemates on displaced archives. Archival Science. 19, 185–203 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09305-z.
208.
Sato, S.: ‘Operation Legacy’: Britain’s Destruction and Concealment of Colonial Records Worldwide. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History. 45, 697–719 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/03086534.2017.1294256.
209.
Espinal, Isabel: A Holistic Approach for Inclusive Librarianship: Decentering Whiteness in Our Profession. Library Trends. 67, 147–162 (2018).
210.
Schwartz, J.M., Cook, T.: Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science. 2, 1–19 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435628.
211.
Lamont, J.: Records Management: An Expanding Role.
212.
Broady-Preston, J.: The information professional of the future: polymath or dinosaur? Library Management. 31, 66–78 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121011013412.
213.
Procter, M.: What’s an ‘Archivist’? Some Nineteenth-Century Perspectives. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 31, 15–27 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379811003658476.
214.
Scanlan, K.: ARMA v. SAA: The History and Heart of Professional Friction. The American Archivist. 74, (2011).
215.
Millar, Laura: Explaining Ourselves: 40 Years of Archivaria.
216.
Ismail, A., Jamaludin, A.: Records professionals: an invisible profession in Malaysia. Records Management Journal. 21, 69–75 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111125116.
217.
Cline, S.: ‘To the Limit of Our Integrity’: Reflections on Archival Being. The American Archivist. 72, 331–343 (2009). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.72.2.g0321510717r6j14.
218.
Shepherd, Elizabeth: Gatekeepers to the Profession: Archival e ducation, 1880–1980. In: Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Ashgate, Farnham (2009). https://doi.org/https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780754681922/startPage/186.
219.
Jenkinson, Hilary: The English archivist: a new profession. H.K. Lewis, London (1948).
220.
Elizabeth, G., Rebecca, S.: ‘Golden Age,’ Quiescence, and Revival: How the Sociology of Professions Became the Study of Knowledge-Based Work.
221.
Currall, J., Moss, M.: We are archivists, but are we OK? Records Management Journal. 18, 69–91 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690810858532.
222.
McLeod, J., Hare, C.: Development of RMJ: A mirror of the development of the profession and discipline of records management. Records Management Journal. 20, 9–40 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011036215.
223.
Cline, S.: "Dust Clouds of Camels Shall Cover You”: Covenant and the Archival Endeavor. American Archivist. (2012).
224.
Shepherd, E.: Pioneering women archivists in England: Ethel Stokes (1870–1944), record agent. Archival Science. 17, 175–194 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9272-x.
225.
Lappin, J.: What will be the next records management orthodoxy? Records Management Journal. 20, 252–264 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011095283.
226.
Ceeney, N.: The Role of a 21st-century National Archive—The Relevance of the Jenkinsonian Tradition, and a Redefinition for the Information Society. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 29, 57–71 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802499868.
227.
Shepherd, E.: Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Ashgate, Farnham (2009).
228.
Gauld, C.: Democratising or privileging: the democratisation of knowledge and the role of the archivist. Archival Science. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9262-4.
229.
Hall, S.: Constituting an archive. Third Text. 15, 89–92 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/09528820108576903.
230.
Against Precarity: Towards a Community-Based Notion of Fiscal Sustainability, https://medium.com/community-archives/against-precarity-towards-a-community-based-notion-of-fiscal-sustainability-815d1d889309.
231.
Flinn, A., Stevens, M., Shepherd, E.: Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream. Archival Science. 9, 71–86 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9105-2.
232.
Sexton, A., Sen, D.: More voice, less ventriloquism– exploring the relational dynamics in a participatory archive of mental health recovery. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 24, 874–888 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2017.1339109.
233.
We Already Are - Sustainable Futures - Medium, https://medium.com/community-archives/we-already-are-52438b863e31.
234.
Eveleigh, A.: Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives, ICA Congress Brisbane 2012. (2012).
235.
Bastian, J.A., Flinn, A. eds: Community archives, community spaces: heritage, memory and identity. Facet Publishing, London (2020).
236.
Welland, S., Cossham, A.: Defining the undefinable: an analysis of definitions of community archives. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. 68, 617–634 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-04-2019-0049.
237.
Flinn, A., Stevens, M.: "It is noh mistri, wi mekin histri”. Telling Our Own Story: Independent and Community Archives in the United Kingdom, Challenging and Subverting the Mainstream. In: Community archives: the shaping of memory. Facet, London (2009).
238.
Cole, J., Nolan, J., Seko, Y., Mancuso, K., Ospina, A.: GimpGirl grows up: Women with disabilities rethinking, redefining, and reclaiming community. New Media & Society. 13, 1161–1179 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811398032.
239.
EICHHORN, K.: D.I.Y. Collectors, Archiving Scholars, and Activist Librarians: Legitimizing Feminist Knowledge and Cultural Production Since 1990. Women’s Studies. 39, 622–646 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2010.490716.
240.
Lau, A.J., Gilliland, A.J., Anderson, K.: NATURALIZING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN INFORMATION STUDIES. Information, Communication & Society. 15, 991–1015 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.630404.
241.
Flinn, A.: The Impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. In: The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. Facet, London (2011).
242.
Baker, S., Huber, A.: Notes towards a typology of the DIY institution: Identifying do-it-yourself places of popular music preservation. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 16, 513–530 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549413491721.
243.
Caswell, M., Mallick, S.: Collecting the easily missed stories: digital participatory microhistory and the South Asian American Digital Archive. Archives and Manuscripts. 42, 73–86 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.880931.
244.
Flinn, A.: Independent Community Archives and Community-Generated Content: ‘Writing, Saving and Sharing our Histories’. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 16, 39–51 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856509347707.
245.
Stevens, M., Flinn, A., Shepherd, E.: New frameworks for community engagement in the archive sector: from handing over to handing on. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 16, 59–76 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903441770.
246.
Gilliland, A., Flinn, A.: Community Archives: What are we really talking about? In: Nexus, Confluence, and Difference: Community Archives meets Community Informatics: Prato CIRN Conference Oct 28-30 2013,. Centre for Community Networking Research, Centre for Social Informatics, Monash University.
247.
Bastian, Jeannette Allis, Alexander, Ben: Community archives: the shaping of memory. Facet, London (2009). https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049047.
248.
Gray, V.: ‘Who’s that Knocking on Our Door?’: Archives, Outreach and Community. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 29, 1–8 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802499652.
249.
Flinn, A.: Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges1. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 28, 151–176 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701611936.
250.
MacNeil, H., Eastwood, T. eds: Currents of archival thinking. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, California (2017).
251.
Cifor, Marika, C., Michelle: ‘To Suddenly Discover Yourself Existing’: Uncovering the Impact of Community Archives. American Archivist. 79, (2016).
252.
Caswell, ML: Seeing Yourself in History: Community Archives in the Fight Against Symbolic Annihilation. The Public Historian: a journal of public history. (2016).
253.
Flinn, A.: Chapter 8: The impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. In: The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. pp. 145–169. Facet, London (2011).
254.
Ramírez, M.: The Task of the Latino/a Archivist: On Archiving Identity and Community. Studies [eScholarship]. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 5(1), Article 3. (2009).
255.
Hopkins, I.: Places From Which to Speak. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 29, 83–109 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802515069.
256.
Cooper, D.: House proud: an ethnography of the BC Gay and Lesbian Archives. Archival Science. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9250-8.
257.
Bastian, Jeannette Allis, Alexander, Ben: Community archives: the shaping of memory. Facet, London (2009). https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049047.
258.
McKemmish, S.: Evidence of me . . . (first published in Archives and Manucscripts, 24 (1) 1996.).
259.
Halilovich, H.: Reclaiming erased lives: archives, records and memories in post-war Bosnia and the Bosnian diaspora. Archival Science. 14, 231–247 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9227-z.
260.
An argument for Archiving Facebook as a Heterogeneous Personal Store, http://www.csdl.tamu.edu/~marshall/DL14-marshall-and-shipman.pdf.
261.
Leighton John, J.: Digital lives - an initial synthesis Version 0.1, (2010).
262.
Lost in Translation: Understanding the Possession of Digital Things in the Cloud, http://willodom.com/publications/paper1202-odom.pdf.
263.
paradigm | workbook on digital private papers.
264.
Catherine Hobbs: The Character of Personal Archives: Reflections on the Value of Records of Individuals. Archivaria. 52, (2001).
265.
Protocols for Native American Archival Materials.
266.
ATSILIRN - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Library and Information Resource Network.
267.
Iacovino, L.: Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Archival Science. 10, 353–372 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3.
268.
Krebs, A.B.: Native America’s twenty-first-century right to know. Archival Science. 12, 173–190 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9161-2.
269.
Riley, T.: Prospects in First Nations Archives: Reflections based on my participation in the Tribal Archives, Libraries and Museums Institutes and Conference programs, http://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/47975/1/Prospects%2520-%2520final.pdf, (2009).
270.
Thorpe, K.: Protocols for libraries and archives in Australia: incorporating Indigenous perspectives in the information field, http://library.ifla.org/99/.
271.
Roy, L., Trace, C., Gilbert, S.: Indigenous ways: assessing the awareness of and potential need for identifying content on indigenous world view in educating Libraries/Archives/Museum (LAM) entry level professionals, http://library.ifla.org/108/.
272.
Christen, K.: Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. The American Archivist. 74, 185–210 (2011). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521.
273.
Gilliland, A.J.: Moving past: probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia. Archival Science. 14, 249–274 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9231-3.
274.
Hawkins, D.T.: Personal archiving: preserving our digital heritage. Information Today, Inc, Medford, N.J. (2013).
275.
Riva A. Pollard: The Appraisal of Personal Papers: A Critical Literature Review. Archivaria. 52, (2001).
276.
Jennifer Meehan: Rethinking Original Order and Personal Records. Archivaria. 70, 27–44 (2010).
277.
Creighton Barrett: Respect Which Fonds? Personal Archives and Family Businesses in Nova Scotia. Archivaria. 76, 75–92 (2013).
278.
Amelia Acker: Death, Memorialization, and Social Media: A Platform Perspective for Personal Archives. Archivaria. 77, 1–23 (2014).
279.
Anna Chen: Disorder: Vocabularies of Hoarding in Personal Digital Archiving Practices. Archivaria. 78, 115–134 (2014).
280.
Johnston, R., Marwood, K.: Action heritage: research, communities, social justice. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 23, 816–831 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2017.1339111.
281.
Runnymede Trust: Finding Common Cause: building research collaborations between universities and Black and minority ethnic communities, https://www.runnymedetrust.org/uploads/publications/Runnymede%20Common%20Cause%20briefing%20FINAL.pdf.
282.
Shilton, K., Srinivasan, R.: Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections.
283.
Isto Huvila: The Unbearable Lightness of Participating? Revisiting the discourses of ’participation’ in archival literature, http://www.istohuvila.se/files/IstoHuvilaUnbearableLightnessPreprint.pdf.
284.
Huvila, I.: Participatory archive: towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualisation of records management. Archival Science. 8, 15–36 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-008-9071-0.
285.
Rolan, G.: Agency in the archive: a model for participatory recordkeeping. Archival Science. 17, 195–225 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9267-7.
286.
Theimer, K.: What Is the Meaning of Archives 2.0? The American Archivist. 74, 58–68 (2011). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.h7tn4m4027407666.
287.
Waterton, E., Smith, L.: The recognition and misrecognition of community heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 16, 4–15 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903441671.
288.
Anderson, S., Allen, R.: Envisioning the Archival Commons. The American Archivist. 72, 383–400 (2009). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.72.2.g54085061q586416.
289.
Flinn, A., Pick, G.: Diversifying and deomcratising archive collections - an agenda for transformation. In: Embedding shared heritage: the Heritage Diversity Task Force report. Greater London Authority, London (2009).
290.
Lang, C., Stillman, L., Linger, H., Dalvean, J., McNamara, B., McGrath, J., Collins, R.: COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS IN THE COMMUNITY. Information, Communication & Society. 15, 1081–1105 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.704061.
291.
Battley, B.: Co-producing archival research with communication, reflexivity and friendship: crossing the three-wire bridge. Archival Science. 17, 371–391 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-017-9279-y.
292.
Newman, J.: Revisiting Archive Collections: Developing Models for Participatory Cataloguing. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 33, 57–73 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2012.666404.
293.
Flinn, A., Sexton, A.: Research on community heritage: moving from collaborative research to participatory and co-designed practice, https://studylib.net/doc/12864587/research-on-community-heritage--moving-from-collaborative.
294.
Bastian, J.A., Flinn, A. eds: Community archives, community spaces: heritage, memory and identity. Facet Publishing, London (2020).
295.
No red lines: Industry defuses ethics guidelines for artificial intelligence – AlgorithmWatch, https://algorithmwatch.org/en/industry-defuses-ethics-guidelines-for-artificial-intelligence/.
296.
National Audit Office: Challenges in Using Data Across Government, https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Challenges-in-using-data-across-government.pdf.
297.
Lemieux, V.L.: Trusting records: is Blockchain technology the answer? Records Management Journal. 26, 110–139 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-12-2015-0042.
298.
Goudarouli, E., Sexton, A., Sheridan, J.: The Challenge of the Digital and the Future Archive: Through the Lens of The National Archives UK. Philosophy & Technology. 32, 173–183 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0333-3.
299.
Kirk, D., Sellen, A.: On Human Remains: Values and Practice in the Home Archiving of Cherished Objects. Microsoft Research.
300.
Irons, A.: Computer forensics and records management – compatible disciplines. Records Management Journal. 16, 102–112 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690610677463.
301.
Rethinking the Web as a Personal Archive. Microsoft Research.
302.
The Institute of Conservation Professional Standards in Conservation, https://www.icon.org.uk/resources/resources-for-conservation-professionals/standards-and-ethics/icon-professional-standards.html.
303.
Michele V. Cloonan: The Boundaries of Preservation and Conservation Research. Libraries & the Cultural Record. 46, 220–229 (2011).
304.
Kim, Y., Ross, S.: Closing the loop: Assisting archival appraisal and information retrieval in one sweep. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 50, 1–10 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001042.
305.
Harvey, R., Thompson, D.: Automating the appraisal of digital materials. Library Hi Tech. 28, 313–322 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011047703.
306.
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives: Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. Facet Publishing, London (2016).
307.
Bunn, J.: Developing descriptive standards: a renewed call to action. Archives and Records. 34, 235–247 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2013.830066.
308.
Niu, J.: Organisation and description of datasets. Archives and Manuscripts. 44, 73–85 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2016.1179585.
309.
Gracy, K.F.: Archival description and linked data: a preliminary study of opportunities and implementation challenges. Archival Science. 15, 239–294 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9216-2.
310.
MacNeil, H.: What finding aids do: archival description as rhetorical genre in traditional and web-based environments. Archival Science. 12, 485–500 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9175-4.
311.
Clough, P., Tang, J., Hall, M.M., Warner, A.: Linking archival data to location: a case study at the UK National Archives. Aslib Proceedings. 63, 127–147 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531111135628.
312.
Rolan, G.: Towards Archive 2.0: issues in archival systems interoperability. Archives and Manuscripts. 43, 42–60 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.959535.
313.
When Archivists and Digital Asset Managers Collide: Tensions and Ways Forward | The American Archivist, http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.121.
314.
Eito-Brun, R.: Context-based aggregation of archival data: the role of authority records in the semantic landscape. Archival Science. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9215-3.
315.
Marty, P.F.: An Introduction to Digital Convergence: Libraries, Archives, and Museums in the Information Age. The Library Quarterly. 80, 1–5 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1086/648549.
316.
Niu, J.: Event-based archival information organization. Archival Science. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9222-4.
317.
Ray, J.: Sharks, digital curation, and the education of information professionals. Museum Management and Curatorship. 24, 357–368 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770903314720.
318.
Cunningham, A.: Digital Curation/Digital Archiving: A View from the National Archives of Australia. The American Archivist. 71, 530–543 (2008). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.71.2.p0h0t68547385507.
319.
Higgins, S.: Digital Curation: The Emergence of a New Discipline. International Journal of Digital Curation. 6, (2011). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.191.
320.
Timms, K.: New Partnerships for Old Sibling Rivals: The Development of Integrated Access Systems for the Holdings of Archives, Libraries and Museums, http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13230/14549.
321.
Lee, C., Tibbo, H.: Where’s the Archivist in Digital Curation? Exploring the Possibities through a Matrix of Knowledge and Skills, http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13362/14668.
322.
Cumming, K., Findlay, C.: Digital recordkeeping: are we at a tipping point? Records Management Journal. 20, 265–278 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011095292.
323.
Kalfatovic, M.R., Kapsalis, E., Spiess, K.P., Camp, A., Edson, M.: Smithsonian Team Flickr: a library, archives, and museums collaboration in web 2.0 space. Archival Science. 8, 267–277 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9089-y.
324.
Museum Management and Curatorship - Volume 24, Issue 4, https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rmmc20/24/4.
325.
Marsden, C.: Sectors and Domains: Some reflections on co-operation and integration. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 22, 17–23 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810120037469.
326.
Robinson, H.: Remembering things differently: museums, libraries and archives as memory institutions and the implications for convergence. Museum Management and Curatorship. 27, 413–429 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2012.720188.
327.
Exploring Heritage in Participatory Culture: The MuseumApp | museumsandtheweb.com, http://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2011/papers/exploring_heritage_in_participatory_culture_th.
328.
Strauss, A.: Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3.
329.
Gilliland, A.J., Halilovich, H.: Migrating memories: transdisciplinary pedagogical approaches to teaching about diasporic memory, identity and human rights in archival studies. Archival Science. 17, 79–96 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9265-9.
330.
Ricardo, P., Michelle, C.: Critical Directions for Archival Approaches to Social Justice. The Library Quarterly.
331.
Matthews, R.J.: Is the archivist a "radical atheist” now? Deconstruction, its new wave, and archival activism. Archival Science. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9248-2.
332.
Butler, B.: ‘Othering’ the archive—from exile to inclusion and heritage dignity: the case of Palestinian archival memory. Archival Science. 9, 57–69 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9095-0.
333.
Susan Pell: Radicalizing the Politics of the Archive: An Ethnographic Reading of an Activist Archive. Archivaria. 80, 33–57 (2015).
334.
Flinn, A., Alexander, B.: "Humanizing an inevitability political craft”: Introduction to the special issue on archiving activism and activist archiving. Archival Science. 15, 329–335 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9260-6.
335.
Evans, J., McKemmish, S., Daniels, E., McCarthy, G.: Self-determination and archival autonomy: advocating activism. Archival Science. 15, 337–368 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9244-6.
336.
Jimerson, Randall C., Society of American Archivists: Archives power: memory, accountability, and social justice. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2009).
337.
Wakimoto, D.K., Bruce, C., Partridge, H.: Archivist as activist: lessons from three queer community archives in California. Archival Science. 13, 293–316 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9201-1.
338.
Flinn, A.: Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions [eScholarship]. interActions UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies. 7, (2011).
339.
Sellie, A., Goldstein, J., Fair, M., Hoyer, J.: Interference Archive: a free space for social movement culture. Archival Science. 15, 453–472 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9245-5.
340.
Gilliland, Anne J: The Role of Participatory Archives in Furthering Human Rights, Reconciliation and Recovery. Atlanti: Review for Modern Archival Theory and Practice,. 24,.
341.
Yaco, S., Hardy, B.B.: Historians, archivists, and social activism: benefits and costs. Archival Science. 13, 253–272 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9187-0.
342.
Buchanan, A., Bastian, M.: Activating the archive: rethinking the role of traditional archives for local activist projects. Archival Science. 15, 429–451 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9247-3.
343.
Wood, S., Carbone, K., Cifor, M., Gilliland, A., Punzalan, R.: Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights. Archival Science. 14, 397–419 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9233-1.
344.
Caswell, M.: Defining human rights archives: introduction to the special double issue on archives and human rights. Archival Science. 14, 207–213 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9226-0.
345.
Schwartz, J.M., Cook, T.: Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science. 2, 1–19 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435628.
346.
Harris, V.: The archival sliver: Power, memory, and archives in South Africa. Archival Science. 2, 63–86 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435631.
347.
Sachs, A.: Archives, Truth, and Reconciliation. Archivaria. 62, (2006).
348.
Hamilton, Carolyn: Refiguring the archive. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0570-8.
349.
Cumming, K., Picot, A.: Reinventing appraisal. Archives and Manuscripts. 42, 133–145 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.926824.
350.
Schellenberg, T.R.: The Appraisal of Modern Records.
351.
The National Archives Appraisal Policy Background Paper - The ‘Grigg System’ and Beyond.
352.
Cook, T.: Macroappraisal in Theory and Practice: Origins, Characteristics, and Implementation in Canada, 1950–2000. Archival Science. 5, 101–161 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-9010-2.
353.
Significance 2.0: a guide to assessing the significance of collections - significance-2.0.pdf, https://www.arts.gov.au/what-we-do/museums-libraries-and-galleries/significance-20.
354.
Booms, H.: Society and the Formation of a Documentary Heritage: Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources.
355.
Abraham, T.: Collection Policy or Documentation Strategy: Theory and Practice. The American Archivist. 54, 44–52 (1991). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.54.1.v2323483077xr227.
356.
Cox, R.: The Documentation Strategy and Archival Appraisal Principles: A Different Perspective.
357.
Boles, F., Young, J.: Exploring the Black Box: The Appraisal of University Administrative Records. The American Archivist. 48, 121–140 (1985). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.48.2.1414g624328868vw.
358.
Bailey, C.: Past Imperfect? Reflections on the Evolution of Canadian Federal Government Records Appraisal.
359.
Hohmann, P.: On Impartiality and Interrelatedness: Reactions to Jenkinsonian Appraisal in the Twentieth Century. The American Archivist. 79, 14–25 (2016). https://doi.org/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.14.
360.
Wisniewski, Timothy.: Framers of the Kept: Against the Grain Appraisal of Ephemeral Moving Images. The Moving Image. 7, 1–24 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1353/mov.2008.0002.
361.
Cynthia K. Sauer: Doing the Best We Can? The Use of Collection Development Policies and Cooperative Collecting Activities at Manuscript Repositories. The American Archivist. 64, 308–349 (2001).
362.
Mancuso, L.: Archival appraisal in Brazil. Archives and Manuscripts. 41, 146–159 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2013.801101.
363.
Kretzschmar, R.: Archival Appraisal in Germany: A Decade of Theory, Strategies, and Practices. Archival Science. 5, 219–238 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-9014-y.
364.
Taylor, I.: The German appraisal discussion since 1990: an overview. Archives and Manuscripts. 44, 14–23 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2015.1136226.
365.
Cook, M.: Appraisal and access: We should expect changes driven by the media and by public awareness. Records Management Journal. 20, 72–77 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011039843.
366.
Eastwood, T.: Reflections on the Goal of Archival Appraisal in Demoncratic Societies.
367.
FORTIER, N.: Transparency, Compliance, and Accountability: Developing a Knowledge Infrastructure for Macroappraisal at Library and Archives Canada. Archival Science. 5, 343–360 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-9005-z.
368.
The National Geospatial Digital Archives—Collection Development: Lessons Learned. Library Trends. 57, 490–515 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.0.0049.
369.
Carvalho, C.: Appraisal based on organic functional analysis: a case study in an electronic records environment. Records Management Journal. 11, 175–205 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007274.
370.
Sims, F.: A new appraisal approach for English Heritage. Records Management Journal. 12, 8–13 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690210427743.
371.
Tschan, R.: A Comparison of Jenkinson and Schellenberg on Appraisal. The American Archivist. 65, 176–195 (2002). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.65.2.920w65g3217706l1.
372.
Cox, Richard J.: No innocent deposits: forming archives by rethinking appraisal. Scarecrow Press, Lanham, Md (2004).
373.
Arias, P.B.: Appraising the value of statistical records of the European Central Bank for retention scheduling purposes. Records Management Journal. 18, 205–220 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690810916456.
374.
Jonker, A.E.M.: No Privileged Past—Acquisition Revisited. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 30, 67–80 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810903264625.
375.
Cook, Terry, Samuels, Helen Willa: Controlling the past: documenting society and institutions : essays in honor of Helen Willa Samuels. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2011).
376.
Boles, Frank: Selecting & appraising archives & manuscripts. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2005).
377.
Samuels, H.: Improving our disposition: documentation strategy. Archivaria. 33, (1991).
378.
Craig, Barbara Lazenby: Archival appraisal: theory and practice. K.G. Saur, München (2004).
379.
SCOTT, M.: Functional appraisal of records: a methodology. Records Management Journal. 7, 101–114 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1108/eb027107.
380.
Cox, R., Samuels, H.: The Archivist’s First Responsibility: A Research Agenda to Improve the Identification and Retention of Records of Enduring Value. The American Archivist. 51, 28–42 (1988). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.51.1-2.gkw67424l3344ug8.
381.
Alexander, P., Samuels, H.: The Roots of 128: A Hypothetical Documentation Strategy. The American Archivist. 50, 518–531 (1987). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.50.4.v889q1182r11p36u.
382.
Honer, E., Graham, S.: Should Users Have a Role in Determining the Future Archive? The Approach Adopted by the Public Record Office, the UK National Archive, to the Selection of Records for Permanent Preservation | Honer | LIBER Quarterly.
383.
MacNeil, H., Eastwood, T. eds: Currents of archival thinking. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, California (2017).
