Bibliography for INST0041: Concepts and Contexts BETA

Abraham, T. (1991) ‘Collection Policy or Documentation Strategy: Theory and Practice’, The American Archivist, 54(1), pp. 44–52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.54.1.v2323483077xr227.

Acker, A. (2015) ‘How cells became records: standardization and infrastructure in tissue culture’, Archival Science, 15(1), pp. 1–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9213-x.

Against Precarity: Towards a Community-Based Notion of Fiscal Sustainability (no date). Available at: https://medium.com/community-archives/against-precarity-towards-a-community-based-notion-of-fiscal-sustainability-815d1d889309.

Alexander, P. and Samuels, H. (1987) ‘The Roots of 128: A Hypothetical Documentation Strategy’, The American Archivist, 50(4), pp. 518–531. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.50.4.v889q1182r11p36u.

Altman, B. and Nemmers, J. (2001) ‘The Usability of On-line Archival Resources: The Polaris Project Finding Aid’, The American Archivist, 64(1), pp. 121–131. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.64.1.80300272655rqu74.

Amelia Acker (2014) ‘Death, Memorialization, and Social Media:  A Platform Perspective for Personal Archives’, Archivaria, 77, pp. 1–23. Available at: https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13469.

An Archive of Feelings: Trauma, Sexuality, and Lesbian Public Cultures | Books Gateway | Duke University Press (no date). Available at: https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/773/An-Archive-of-FeelingsTrauma-Sexuality-and-Lesbian.

‘An argument for Archiving Facebook as a Heterogeneous Personal Store’ (no date). Available at: http://www.csdl.tamu.edu/~marshall/DL14-marshall-and-shipman.pdf.

Anderson, S. and Allen, R. (2009) ‘Envisioning the Archival Commons’, The American Archivist, 72(2), pp. 383–400. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.72.2.g54085061q586416.

Anna Chen (2014) ‘Disorder: Vocabularies of Hoarding in Personal Digital Archiving Practices’, Archivaria, 78, pp. 115–134. Available at: http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13507.

Anne, G. (no date) The Archival Paradigm: The Genesis and Rationales of Archival Principles and Practices: Council on Library and Information Resources. Available at: http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub89/archival.html.

‘Archival Amnesty: In Search of Black American Transitional and Restorative Justice | Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies’ (no date). Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.42.

Archives and Records Association Code of Ethics (no date). Available at: https://www.archives.org.uk/ara-code-of-ethics.

Arias, P.B. (2008) ‘Appraising the value of statistical records of the European Central Bank for retention scheduling purposes’, Records Management Journal, 18(3), pp. 205–220. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690810916456.

ARMA Information Governance Professional Code of Ethics (no date). Available at: https://www.arma.org/page/IGP_Ethics.

Atherton, Jay (1985) ‘From Life Cycle to Continuum: Some Thoughts on the Records Management - Archives Relationship’, Archiviria [Preprint], (21).

ATSILIRN - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Library and Information Resource Network (no date).

Bailey, C. (no date) ‘Past Imperfect? Reflections on the Evolution of Canadian Federal Government Records Appraisal’. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13432/14742.

Baker, S. and Huber, A. (2013) ‘Notes towards a typology of the DIY institution: Identifying do-it-yourself places of popular music preservation’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(5), pp. 513–530. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549413491721.

Bastian, J. (2001) ‘A Question of Custody: The Colonial Archives of the United States Virgin Islands’, The American Archivist, 64(1), pp. 96–114. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.64.1.h6k872252u2gr377.

Bastian, J. (2002) ‘Taking Custody, Giving Access:  A Postcustodial Role for a New Century’, Archivaria [Preprint], (53).

Bastian, J.A. and Flinn, A. (eds) (2020a) Community archives, community spaces: heritage, memory and identity [electronic resource]. London: Facet Publishing.

Bastian, J.A. and Flinn, A. (eds) (2020b) Community archives, community spaces: heritage, memory and identity [electronic resource]. London: Facet Publishing.

Bastian, Jeannette Allis and Alexander, Ben (2009a) Community archives: the shaping of memory. London: Facet. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049047.

Bastian, Jeannette Allis and Alexander, Ben (2009b) Community archives: the shaping of memory. London: Facet. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049047.

Battley, B. (2017) ‘Co-producing archival research with communication, reflexivity and friendship: crossing the three-wire bridge’, Archival Science, 17(4), pp. 371–391. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-017-9279-y.

Bazerman, C. (2012) ‘The orders of documents, the orders of activity, and the orders of information’, Archival Science, 12(4), pp. 377–388. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9178-1.

Benedict, Karen M. and Society of American Archivists (2003) Ethics and the archival profession: introduction and case studies. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.

Birkinshaw, P. (2005a) Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation. 3rd ed. Haywards Heath: Tottel.

Birkinshaw, P. (2005b) Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation. 3rd ed. Haywards Heath: Tottel.

Birkinshaw, P. (2010a) ‘Freedom of information and its impact in the United Kingdom’, Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), pp. 312–321. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.006.

Birkinshaw, P. (2010b) Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844904.

Birkinshaw, P. (2010c) Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844904.

Boles, F. and Young, J. (1985) ‘Exploring the Black Box: The Appraisal of University Administrative Records’, The American Archivist, 48(2), pp. 121–140. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.48.2.1414g624328868vw.

Boles, Frank (2005) Selecting & appraising archives & manuscripts. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.

Booms, H. (1987) Society and the Formation of a Documentary Heritage: Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources.

Brilmyer, G. (no date) Center for the Study of Women | Why Disability Studies for Archives? | Center for the Study of Women. Available at: https://csw.ucla.edu/2018/07/13/why-disability-studies-for-archives/.

Broady-Preston, J. (2010) ‘The information professional of the future: polymath or dinosaur?’, Library Management, 31(1/2), pp. 66–78. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121011013412.

Brothman, B. (1991) Orders of Value: Probing the Theoretical Terms of Archival Practice.

Brothman, B. (1999) ‘Declining Derrida: Integrity, Tensegrity, and the Preservation of Archives from Deconstruction’, Archivaria, 48. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12717/13894.

BS ISO 15489-1:2016                Information and documentation. Records management. Concepts and principles (2016). BSI. Available at: https://bsol.bsigroup.com/Bibliographic/BibliographicInfoData/000000000030298891.

Buchanan, A. and Bastian, M. (2015) ‘Activating the archive: rethinking the role of traditional archives for local activist projects’, Archival Science, 15(4), pp. 429–451. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9247-3.

Bunn, Jennifer (2013) ‘Developing descriptive standards: a renewed call to action’, Archives and Records, 34(2), pp. 235–247. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2013.830066.

Bunn, Jenny (2013) ‘Questioning autonomy: an alternative perspective on the principles which govern archival description’, Archival Science [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9200-2.

Butler, B. (2009) ‘“Othering” the archive—from exile to inclusion and heritage dignity: the case of Palestinian archival memory’, Archival Science, 9(1–2), pp. 57–69. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9095-0.

Caron, D.J. and Kellerhals, A. (no date) Supporting Democratic Values Through a Relevant Documentary Foundation - An Evolutionary Complex.

Carvalho, C. (2001) ‘Appraisal based on organic functional analysis: a case study in an electronic records environment’, Records Management Journal, 11(3), pp. 175–205. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007274.

Caswell, M. (2013) ‘Not Just Between Us: A Riposte to Mark Greene  / Letter to the Editor’, American Archivist, 76(2). Available at: http://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.76.2.89324135v02r2q74.

Caswell, M. (2014) ‘Defining human rights archives: introduction to the special double issue on archives and human rights’, Archival Science, 14(3–4), pp. 207–213. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9226-0.

Caswell, M. (no date) ‘On archival pluralism: what religious pluralism (and its critics) can teach us about archives’. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-012-9197-y.

Caswell, M. and Mallick, S. (2014) ‘Collecting the easily missed stories: digital participatory microhistory and the South Asian American Digital Archive’, Archives and Manuscripts, 42(1), pp. 73–86. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.880931.

Caswell, ML (2016) ‘Seeing Yourself in History: Community Archives in the Fight Against Symbolic Annihilation’, The Public Historian: a journal of public history [Preprint]. Available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9gc14537#page-1.

Caswell, ML (no date) "’The Archive’ Is Not an Archives: On Acknowledging the Intellectual Contributions of Archival Studies”. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7bn4v1fk.

Catherine Hobbs (2001) ‘The Character of Personal Archives: Reflections on the Value of Records of Individuals’, Archivaria, 52. Available at: http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12817/14028.

Ceeney, N. (2008) ‘The Role of a 21st-century National Archive—The Relevance of the Jenkinsonian Tradition, and a Redefinition for the Information Society’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 29(1), pp. 57–71. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802499868.

Chapman, A. (2004) ‘Collection-level description: Joining up the domains’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 25(2), pp. 149–155. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0037981042000271475.

Christen, K. (2011) ‘Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation’, The American Archivist, 74(1), pp. 185–210. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521.

Cifor, M. (2016) ‘Affecting relations: introducing affect theory to archival discourse’, Archival Science, 16(1), pp. 7–31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9261-5.

Cifor, Marika, C., Michelle (2016) ‘“To Suddenly Discover Yourself Existing”: Uncovering the Impact of Community Archives’, American Archivist, 79(1). Available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0nd5g0p7.

Cline, S. (2009) ‘“To the Limit of Our Integrity”: Reflections on Archival Being’, The American Archivist, 72(2), pp. 331–343. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.72.2.g0321510717r6j14.

Cline, S. (2012) ‘"Dust Clouds of Camels Shall Cover You”: Covenant and the Archival Endeavor’, American Archivist [Preprint]. Available at: https://americanarchivist.org/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.75.2.03193j1517858r34.

Clough, P. et al. (2011) ‘Linking archival data to location: a case study at the UK National Archives’, Aslib Proceedings, 63(2/3), pp. 127–147. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531111135628.

Cole, J. et al. (2011) ‘GimpGirl grows up: Women with disabilities rethinking, redefining, and reclaiming community’, New Media & Society, 13(7), pp. 1161–1179. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811398032.

Confronting Our Failure of Care Around the Legacies of Marginalized People in the Archives (no date). Available at: https://medium.com/on-archivy/confronting-our-failure-of-care-around-the-legacies-of-marginalized-people-in-the-archives-dc4180397280.

Cook, M. (2006) ‘Professional ethics and practice in archives and records management in a human rights context ∗’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 27(1), pp. 1–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00039810600691205.

Cook, M. (2010) ‘Appraisal and access: We should expect changes driven by the media and by public awareness’, Records Management Journal, 20(1), pp. 72–77. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011039843.

Cook, T. (2001a) ‘Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts’, Archival Science, 1(1), pp. 3–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435636.

Cook, T. (2001b) ‘Fashionable Nonsense or Professional Rebirth: Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives’, Archivaria, 51. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12792/13989.

Cook, T. (2006) ‘Macroappraisal in Theory and Practice: Origins, Characteristics, and Implementation in Canada, 1950–2000’, Archival Science, 5(2–4), pp. 101–161. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-9010-2.

Cook, T. (2007) ‘Electronic Records, Paper Minds: The Revolution in  Information Management and Archives in the Post-Custodial  and Post-Modernist Era’, Archives & Social Studies [Preprint].

Cook, T. (2011) ‘“We Are What We Keep; We Keep What We Are”: Archival Appraisal Past, Present and Future’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 32(2), pp. 173–189. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2011.619688.

Cook, T. (2013) ‘Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms’, Archival Science, 13(2–3), pp. 95–120. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7.

Cook, T. and Schwartz, J.M. (2002) ‘Archives, records, and power: From (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance’, Archival Science, 2(3–4), pp. 171–185. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435620.

Cook, Terry (1993) ‘The Concept of the Archival Fonds in the Post-Custodial Era: Theory, Problems and Solutions’, Archivaria, 35.

Cook, Terry (1997) ‘What is Past is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas Since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift’, Archiviaria, (43), pp. 17–63.

Cook, Terry and Samuels, Helen Willa (2011) Controlling the past: documenting society and institutions : essays in honor of Helen Willa Samuels. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.

Cooper, D. (2015) ‘House proud: an ethnography of the BC Gay and Lesbian Archives’, Archival Science [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9250-8.

Council of Europe (2003) ‘Access to official documents Recommendation Rec (2002) 2 of the Committee of Ministers and explanatory memorandum’. Directorate General of Human Rights, Council of Europe.

Council of Europe - Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents (CETS No. 205) (2009).

Cox, R. (no date) The Documentation Strategy and Archival Appraisal Principles: A Different Perspective.

Cox, R. and Samuels, H. (1988) ‘The Archivist’s First Responsibility: A Research Agenda to Improve the Identification and Retention of Records of Enduring Value’, The American Archivist, 51(1–2), pp. 28–42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.51.1-2.gkw67424l3344ug8.

Cox, Richard J. (2004) No innocent deposits: forming archives by rethinking appraisal. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press.

Cox, Richard J. (2006a) Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world. London: Facet.

Cox, Richard J. (2006b) Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world. London: Facet.

Cox, Richard J (no date) ‘Rethinking Archival Ethics’, Journal of Information Ethics, 22, pp. 13–20. Available at: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1661892025?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo.

Craig, Barbara Lazenby (2004) Archival appraisal: theory and practice. München: K.G. Saur.

Craven, Louise (2008) What are archives?: cultural and theoretical perspectives : a reader. Aldershot: Ashgate. Available at: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.4324/9781315547497.

Creighton Barrett (2013) ‘Respect Which Fonds? Personal Archives and Family Businesses in Nova Scotia’, Archivaria, 76, pp. 75–92. Available at: https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13459.

‘Critical Archival Studies: An Introduction | Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies’ (no date a). Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.50.

‘Critical Archival Studies: An Introduction | Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies’ (no date b). Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.50.

Cumming, K. (2010) ‘Ways of seeing: contextualising the continuum’, Records Management Journal, 20(1), pp. 41–52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011036224.

Cumming, K. and Findlay, C. (2010) ‘Digital recordkeeping: are we at a tipping point?’, Records Management Journal, 20(3), pp. 265–278. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011095292.

Cumming, K. and Picot, A. (2014) ‘Reinventing appraisal’, Archives and Manuscripts, 42(2), pp. 133–145. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.926824.

Cunningham, A. (2008) ‘Digital Curation/Digital Archiving: A View from the National Archives of Australia’, The American Archivist, 71(2), pp. 530–543. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.71.2.p0h0t68547385507.

Currall, J. and Moss, M. (2008) ‘We are archivists, but are we OK?’, Records Management Journal, 18(1), pp. 69–91. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690810858532.

Cynthia K. Sauer (2001) ‘Doing the Best We Can? The Use of Collection Development Policies and Cooperative Collecting Activities at Manuscript Repositories’, The American Archivist, 64(2), pp. 308–349. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/40294175?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Doing&searchText=the&searchText=best&searchText=we&searchText=can?&searchText=The&searchText=use&searchText=of&searchText=collection&searchText=development&searchText=policies&searchText=and&searchText=cooperative&searchText=collecting&searchText=activities&searchText=at&searchText=manuscript&searchText=repositories&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DDoing%2Bthe%2Bbest%2Bwe%2Bcan%253F%2BThe%2Buse%2Bof%2Bcollection%2Bdevelopment%2Bpolicies%2Band%2Bcooperative%2Bcollecting%2Bactivities%2Bat%2Bmanuscript%2Brepositories%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj50000557%26amp%3BSearch%3DSearch%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3BglobalSearch%3D%26amp%3BsbbBox%3D%26amp%3BsbjBox%3D%26amp%3BsbpBox%3D.

Daines, J.G. and Nimer, C.L. (2011) ‘Re-Imagining Archival Display: Creating User-Friendly Finding Aids’, Journal of Archival Organization, 9(1), pp. 4–31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2011.574019.

Daniels, M. and Yakel, E. (2010) ‘Seek and You May Find: Successful Search in Online Finding Aid Systems’, The American Archivist, 73(2), pp. 535–568. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.73.2.p578900680650357.

Danielson, Elena S. (2010) The ethical archivist. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.

Derrida, Jacques and Prenowitz, Eric (1996) Archive fever: a Freudian impression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Dever, M. (2014) ‘Photographs and manuscripts: working in the archive’, Archives and Manuscripts, 42(3), pp. 282–294. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.956322.

Dingwall, G. (2004) ‘Trusting Archivists: The Role of Archival Ethics Codes in Establishing Public Faith’, The American Archivist, 67(1), pp. 11–30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.67.1.mw0914r2p52xx2t4.

Dirks, J. (2004) ‘Accountability, History, and Archives: Conflicting Priorities or Synthesized Strands?’, Archivaria, 57. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/viewFile/12451/13554.

Duchein, M. (1992) ‘The History of European Archives and the Development of the Archival Profession in Europe’, The American Archivist, 55(1), pp. 14–25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.55.1.k17n44g856577888.

Duff, W. and Johnson, C. (2003) ‘Where Is the List with All the Names? Information-Seeking Behavior of Genealogists’, The American Archivist, 66(1), pp. 79–95. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.66.1.l375uj047224737n.

Duff, W.M. et al. (2013) ‘Social justice impact of archives: a preliminary investigation’, Archival Science, 13(4), pp. 317–348. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9198-x.

Dunbar, A.W. (2006) ‘Introducing critical race theory to archival discourse: getting the conversation started’, Archival Science, 6(1), pp. 109–129. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-006-9022-6.

Duranti, L. (1989a) Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 1.

Duranti, L. (1989b) Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 2.

Duranti, L. (1990a) Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 3.

Duranti, L. (1990b) Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 4.

Duranti, L. (1991) Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 5.

Duranti, L. (1992) ‘Origin and Development of the Concept of Archival Description | Duranti | Archivaria’, Archivaria, 35. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/92f1/d3b23cfc46f8c4ed7638ca58fac9c05c4574.pdf.

Duranti, L. (2010) ‘Concepts and principles for the management of electronic records, or records management theory is archival diplomatics’, Records Management Journal, 20(1), pp. 78–95. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011039852.

Duranti, L. (2018) ‘Whose truth? Records and archives as evidence in the era of post-truth and disinformation’, in C. Brown (ed.) Archival Futures. Facet, pp. 19–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783302192.003.

Duranti, L. (no date a) From Digital Diplomatics to Digital Records Forensics. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13229/14548.

Duranti, L. (no date b) Reliability and Authenticity: The Concepts and Their Implications.

Duranti, L. and MacNeil, H. (no date) The Protection of the Integrity of Electronic Records: An Overview of the UBC-MAS Research Project.

Duranti, Luciana (1998) Diplomatics: new uses for an old science. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press.

Duranti, Luciana et al. (2008) International reseach on permanent authentic records in electronic systems (InterPARES) 2: Experimental, interactive and dynamic records. Padova: CLEUP.

Duranti, Luciana and Thibodeau, Kenneth (2006) ‘The Concept of Record in Interactive, Experiential and Dynamic Environments: the View of InterPARES*’, Archival Science, 6(1), pp. 13–68. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-006-9021-7.

Eastwood, T. (1993) Nailing a Little Jelly to the Wall of Archival Studies.

Eastwood, T. (no date a) Reflections on the Goal of Archival Appraisal in Demoncratic Societies.

Eastwood, T. (no date b) What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important?

EICHHORN, K. (2010) ‘D.I.Y. Collectors, Archiving Scholars, and Activist Librarians: Legitimizing Feminist Knowledge and Cultural Production Since 1990’, Women’s Studies, 39(6), pp. 622–646. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2010.490716.

Eito-Brun, R. (2014) ‘Context-based aggregation of archival data: the role of authority records in the semantic landscape’, Archival Science [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9215-3.

Elizabeth, G. and Rebecca, S. (no date) ‘“Golden Age,” Quiescence, and Revival: How the Sociology of Professions Became the Study of Knowledge-Based Work’. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258200542_Golden_Age_Quiescence_and_Revival.

Espinal, Isabel (2018) ‘A Holistic Approach for Inclusive Librarianship: Decentering Whiteness in Our Profession’, Library Trends, 67(1), pp. 147–162. Available at: https://search.proquest.com/docview/2130845198?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511.

Evans, J. et al. (2015) ‘Self-determination and archival autonomy: advocating activism’, Archival Science, 15(4), pp. 337–368. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9244-6.

Eveleigh, A. (2012) Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives, ICA Congress Brisbane 2012. Available at: http://ica2012.ica.org/files/pdf/Full%20papers%20upload/ica12Final00128.pdf.

Exploring Heritage in Participatory Culture: The MuseumApp | museumsandtheweb.com (no date). Available at: http://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2011/papers/exploring_heritage_in_participatory_culture_th.

Fear, K. (2010) ‘User Understanding of Metadata in Digital Image Collections: Or, What Exactly Do You Mean by “Coverage”?’, The American Archivist, 73(1), pp. 26–60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.73.1.j00044lr77415551.

Fear, K. and Donaldson, D.R. (2012) ‘Provenance and credibility in scientific data repositories’, Archival Science, 12(3), pp. 319–339. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9172-7.

Findlay, C. (2016) ‘Archival activism’, Archives and Manuscripts, 44(3), pp. 155–159. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2016.1263964.

Flanagan, M. and Carini, P. (2012) ‘How Games Can Help Us Access and Understand Archival Images’, The American Archivist, 75(2), pp. 514–537. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.75.2.b424537w27970gu4.

Flinn, A. (2007) ‘Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges1’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 28(2), pp. 151–176. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701611936.

Flinn, A. (2010) ‘Independent Community Archives and Community-Generated Content: “Writing, Saving and Sharing our Histories”’, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 16(1), pp. 39–51. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856509347707.

Flinn, A. (2011a) ‘Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions [eScholarship]’, interActions UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 7(2).

Flinn, A. (2011b) ‘Chapter 8: The impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice’, in The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. London: Facet, pp. 145–169. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f8a3983f-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099.

Flinn, A. (2011) ‘The Impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice’, in The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. London: Facet. Available at: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14509809360004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true.

Flinn, A. and Alexander, B. (2015) ‘"Humanizing an inevitability political craft”: Introduction to the special issue on archiving activism and activist archiving’, Archival Science, 15(4), pp. 329–335. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9260-6.

Flinn, A. and Pick, G. (2009) ‘Diversifying and deomcratising archive collections - an agenda for transformation’, in Embedding shared heritage: the Heritage Diversity Task Force report. London: Greater London Authority. Available at: http://www.mla.gov.uk/what/programmes/renaissance/regions/london/News_and_Resources/~/media/London/Files/2009/Publications/Embedding%20Shared%20Heritage_LOW%20resolution.ashx.

Flinn, A. and Sexton, A. (no date) Research on community heritage: moving from collaborative research to participatory and co-designed practice. Available at: https://studylib.net/doc/12864587/research-on-community-heritage--moving-from-collaborative.

Flinn, A. and Stevens, M. (2009) ‘"It is noh mistri, wi mekin histri”. Telling Our Own Story: Independent and Community Archives in the United Kingdom, Challenging and Subverting the Mainstream’, in Community archives: the shaping of memory. London: Facet. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049047.

Flinn, A., Stevens, M. and Shepherd, E. (2009) ‘Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream’, Archival Science, 9(1–2), pp. 71–86. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9105-2.

FORTIER, N. (2005) ‘Transparency, Compliance, and Accountability: Developing a Knowledge Infrastructure for Macroappraisal at Library and Archives Canada’, Archival Science, 5(2–4), pp. 343–360. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-9005-z.

Frank Upward (1996) Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology).

Gale, C. (2006) ‘Record-keeping as an ethical imperative’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 27(1), pp. 17–27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00039810600691221.

Gauld, C. (2015) ‘Democratising or privileging: the democratisation of knowledge and the role of the archivist’, Archival Science [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9262-4.

Geoffrey Yeo (no date) ‘The Conceptual Fonds and the Physical Collection’. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13384/14691.

Gilliland, A. (2011) ‘Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twenty-first century’, Archival Science, 11(3–4), pp. 193–209. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9147-0.

Gilliland, A. and Flinn, A. (no date) ‘Community Archives: What are we really talking about?’, in Nexus, Confluence, and Difference: Community Archives meets Community Informatics: Prato CIRN Conference Oct 28-30 2013,. Centre for Community Networking Research, Centre for Social Informatics, Monash University. Available at: http://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/920626/gilliland_flinn_keynote.pdf.

Gilliland, A.J. (2014) ‘Moving past: probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia’, Archival Science, 14(3–4), pp. 249–274. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9231-3.

Gilliland, A.J. and Caswell, M. (2015) ‘Records and their imaginaries: imagining the impossible, making possible the imagined’, Archival Science [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9259-z.

Gilliland, A.J. and Caswell, M. (2016) ‘Records and their imaginaries: imagining the impossible, making possible the imagined’, Archival Science, 16(1), pp. 53–75. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9259-z.

Gilliland, A.J. and Halilovich, H. (2017) ‘Migrating memories: transdisciplinary pedagogical approaches to teaching about diasporic memory, identity and human rights in archival studies’, Archival Science, 17(1), pp. 79–96. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9265-9.

Gilliland, Anne J (no date) ‘The Role of Participatory Archives in Furthering Human Rights, Reconciliation and Recovery’, Atlanti: Review for Modern Archival Theory and Practice, 24. Available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/346521tf.

Goudarouli, E., Sexton, A. and Sheridan, J. (2019a) ‘The Challenge of the Digital and the Future Archive: Through the Lens of The National Archives UK’, Philosophy & Technology, 32(1), pp. 173–183. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0333-3.

Goudarouli, E., Sexton, A. and Sheridan, J. (2019b) ‘The Challenge of the Digital and the Future Archive: Through the Lens of The National Archives UK’, Philosophy & Technology, 32(1), pp. 173–183. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0333-3.

Gracy, K.F. (2015) ‘Archival description and linked data: a preliminary study of opportunities and implementation challenges’, Archival Science, 15(3), pp. 239–294. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9216-2.

Gray, V. (2008) ‘“Who’s that Knocking on Our Door?”: Archives, Outreach and Community’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 29(1), pp. 1–8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802499652.

Greene, Mark A. (2012) ‘A Critique of Social Justice as an Archival Imperative: What Is It We’re Doing That’s All That Important?’, The American Archivist, 76(2), pp. 302–334. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43490357?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.

Groth, P. et al. (2012) ‘Requirements for Provenance on the Web’, International Journal of Digital Curation, 7(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.213.

Halilovich, H. (2014) ‘Reclaiming erased lives: archives, records and memories in post-war Bosnia and the Bosnian diaspora’, Archival Science, 14(3–4), pp. 231–247. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9227-z.

Hall, S. (2001) ‘Constituting an archive’, Third Text, 15(54), pp. 89–92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09528820108576903.

Ham, G. (1981) ‘Archival Strategies for the Post-Custodial Era’, The American Archivist, 44–3.

Hamilton, Carolyn (2002) Refiguring the archive. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0570-8.

Harris, V. (1997) ‘Claiming Less, Delivering More: A Critique of Positivist Formulations on Archives in South Africa.’, Archivaria, 44. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12200/13217.

Harris, V. (2002) ‘The archival sliver: Power, memory, and archives in South Africa’, Archival Science, 2(1–2), pp. 63–86. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435631.

Harris, V. (2014) ‘Antonyms of our remembering’, Archival Science, 14(3–4), pp. 215–229. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9221-5.

Harvey, R. and Thompson, D. (2010) ‘Automating the appraisal of digital materials’, Library Hi Tech, 28(2), pp. 313–322. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011047703.

Hawkins, D.T. (2013) Personal archiving: preserving our digital heritage. Medford, N.J.: Information Today, Inc.

Heather, M. (2000) ‘Conceptualizing an Authentic Electronic Record’.

Henttonen, P. (2017) ‘Privacy as an archival problem and a solution’, Archival Science, 17(3), pp. 285–303. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-017-9277-0.

Higgins, S. (2011) ‘Digital Curation: The Emergence of a New Discipline’, International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.191.

Hill, A. (2004) ‘Serving the invisible researcher: Meeting the needs of online users’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 25(2), pp. 139–148. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0037981042000271466.

Hohmann, P. (2016) ‘On Impartiality and Interrelatedness: Reactions to Jenkinsonian Appraisal in the Twentieth Century’, The American Archivist, 79(1), pp. 14–25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.14.

Holmlund, Mona and Avery, Cheryl (2010) Better off forgetting?: essays on archives, public policy, and collective memory. London: University of Toronto Press. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/9781442689879.

Honer, E. and Graham, S. (no date) Should Users Have a Role in Determining the Future Archive? The Approach Adopted by the Public Record Office, the UK National Archive, to the Selection of Records for Permanent Preservation | Honer | LIBER Quarterly.

Hopkins, I. (2008) ‘Places From Which to Speak’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 29(1), pp. 83–109. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802515069.

Horsman, P. (no date) The Last Dance of the Phoenix, or the De-discovery of the Archival Fonds.

How Archivists Could Stop Deepfakes From Rewriting History (no date). Available at: https://gizmodo.com/how-archivists-could-stop-deepfakes-from-rewriting-hist-1829666009.

Hurley, C. (2002) ‘Recordkeeping, Document Destruction and the Law (Heiner, Enron and McCabe)’, 30(2).

Hurley, C. (2006) ‘Archivists and Accountability’, 34(2).

Huvila, I. (2008) ‘Participatory archive: towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualisation of records management’, Archival Science, 8(1), pp. 15–36. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-008-9071-0.

Iacovino, L. (2010) ‘Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities’, Archival Science, 10(4), pp. 353–372. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3.

‘Identifying and Dismantling White Supremacy in Archives’ (no date). Available at: http://www.gracenbrilmyer.com/dismantling_whiteSupremacy_archives3.pdf.

International Conference on the History of Records and Archives (2016a) Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. Edited by F. Foscarini et al. London: Facet Publishing. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1424541&site=ehost-live&scope=site.

International Conference on the History of Records and Archives (2016b) Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. Edited by F. Foscarini et al. London: Facet Publishing. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1424541&site=ehost-live&scope=site.

International Conference on the History of Records and Archives (2016c) Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. Edited by F. Foscarini et al. London: Facet Publishing. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1424541&site=ehost-live&scope=site.

International Council on Archives (1992) ‘Statement of Principles Regarding Archival Description’, Archivaria, 1(34). Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11837/12789.

‘InterPARES 1 Template for Analysis’ (no date).

‘InterPARES 3 Intellectual Framework’ (no date).

‘Interview with Dr Anne Thurston on Open Government and trustworthy records | Gov 2.0 Radio’ (no date).

Irons, A. (2006) ‘Computer forensics and records management – compatible disciplines’, Records Management Journal, 16(2), pp. 102–112. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690610677463.

Ishmael, H.J.M. (2018) ‘Reclaiming history: Arthur Schomburg’, Archives and Manuscripts, 46(3), pp. 269–288. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2018.1559741.

Ismail, A. and Jamaludin, A. (2011) ‘Records professionals: an invisible profession in Malaysia’, Records Management Journal, 21(1), pp. 69–75. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111125116.

Isto Huvila (no date) ‘The Unbearable Lightness of Participating? Revisiting the discourses of ’participation’ in archival literature’. Available at: http://www.istohuvila.se/files/IstoHuvilaUnbearableLightnessPreprint.pdf.

Jenkinson, H. (1965) A manual of archive administration. 2nd ed. reprinted. Lund, Humphries.

Jenkinson, Hilary (1948) The English archivist: a new profession. London: H.K. Lewis.

Jenkinson, Hilary and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (1922) Manual of archive administration. Available at: http://www2.archivists.org/publications/epubs.

Jennifer Meehan (2010) ‘Rethinking Original Order and Personal Records’, Archivaria, 70, pp. 27–44. Available at: http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13294.

Jimerson, R. (2013) ‘Archivists and Social Responsibility: A Response to Mark Greene’, The American Archivist, 76(2), pp. 335–345. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.76.2.2627p15350572t21.

Jimerson, Randall C. and Society of American Archivists (2009) Archives power: memory, accountability, and social justice. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.

Jimerson, R.C. (2006) ‘Ethical Concerns for Archivists’, The Public Historian, 28(1), pp. 87–92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2006.28.1.87.

Jimerson, R.C. (2011) ‘Ripples across the pond: global implications of the Heiner Affair’, 39(1).

Johnston, R. and Marwood, K. (2017) ‘Action heritage: research, communities, social justice’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 23(9), pp. 816–831. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2017.1339111.

Jonker, A.E.M. (2009) ‘No Privileged Past—Acquisition Revisited’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 30(1), pp. 67–80. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810903264625.

Kahle, B. (2007) ‘Universal Access to All Knowledge’, The American Archivist, 70(1), pp. 23–31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.70.1.u114006770252845.

Kalfatovic, M.R. et al. (2008) ‘Smithsonian Team Flickr: a library, archives, and museums collaboration in web 2.0 space’, Archival Science, 8(4), pp. 267–277. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9089-y.

Ketelaar, E. (2012) ‘Cultivating archives: meanings and identities’, Archival Science, 12(1), pp. 19–33. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9142-5.

Ketelaar, E. (no date) Archival Theory and the Dutch Manual.

Kim, Y. and Ross, S. (2013) ‘Closing the loop: Assisting archival appraisal and information retrieval in one sweep’, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(1), pp. 1–10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001042.

Kirk, D. and Sellen, A. (no date) ‘On Human Remains: Values and Practice in the Home Archiving of Cherished Objects’, Microsoft Research [Preprint]. Available at: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/on-human-remains-value-and-practice-in-the-home-archiving-of-cherished-objects/.

Krebs, A.B. (2012) ‘Native America’s twenty-first-century right to know’, Archival Science, 12(2), pp. 173–190. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9161-2.

Kretzschmar, R. (2006) ‘Archival Appraisal in Germany: A Decade of Theory, Strategies, and Practices’, Archival Science, 5(2–4), pp. 219–238. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-9014-y.

L, Hughes-Watkins (no date) ‘Moving Toward a Reparative Archive: A Roadmap for a Holistic Approach to Disrupting Homogenous Histories in Academic Repositories and Creating Inclusive Spaces for Marginalized Voices’. Available at: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&context=jcas.

Lager Vestberg, N. (2008) ‘Archival Value’, Photographies, 1(1), pp. 49–65. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17540760701786725.

Lamont, J. (no date) ‘Records Management: An Expanding Role’. Available at: http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/Editorial/Features/Records-management-an-expanding-role-96372.aspx.

Lang, C. et al. (2012) ‘COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS IN THE COMMUNITY’, Information, Communication & Society, 15(7), pp. 1081–1105. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.704061.

Lappin, J. (2010) ‘What will be the next records management orthodoxy?’, Records Management Journal, 20(3), pp. 252–264. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011095283.

Lau, A.J., Gilliland, A.J. and Anderson, K. (2012) ‘NATURALIZING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN INFORMATION STUDIES’, Information, Communication & Society, 15(7), pp. 991–1015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.630404.

Lee, C. and Tibbo, H. (no date) Where’s the Archivist in Digital Curation? Exploring the Possibities through a Matrix of Knowledge and Skills. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13362/14668.

Legislation and regulations | The National Archives (no date). Available at: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/legislation/.

Leighton John, J. (2010) ‘Digital lives - an initial synthesis Version 0.1’. British Library.

Lemieux, V.L. (2010) ‘The records-risk nexus: exploring the relationship between records and risk’, Records Management Journal, 20(2), pp. 199–216. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011064331.

Lemieux, V.L. (2016) ‘Trusting records: is Blockchain technology the answer?’, Records Management Journal, 26(2), pp. 110–139. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-12-2015-0042.

Longmore, B. (2013) ‘The Public Records (Scotland) Act 2011: creating a culture that values public records’, Archives and Records, 34(2), pp. 248–262. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2013.830067.

‘Lost in Translation: Understanding the Possession of Digital Things in the Cloud’ (no date). Available at: http://willodom.com/publications/paper1202-odom.pdf.

Lowry, J. (2019) ‘Radical empathy, the imaginary and affect in (post)colonial records: how to break out of international stalemates on displaced archives’, Archival Science, 19(2), pp. 185–203. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09305-z.

MacNeil, H. (2001) ‘Trusting Records in a Postmodern World’, Archivaria, 51. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12793/13991.

MacNeil, H. (2012) ‘What finding aids do: archival description as rhetorical genre in traditional and web-based environments’, Archival Science, 12(4), pp. 485–500. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9175-4.

MacNeil, H. (no date a) Archival Theory and Practice: Between Two Paradigms.

MacNeil, H. (no date b) Providing Grounds for Trust II: The Findings of the Authenticty Task Force of InterPARES.

MacNeil, H. and Eastwood, T. (eds) (2017a) Currents of archival thinking. Second edition. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited. Available at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509.

MacNeil, H. and Eastwood, T. (eds) (2017b) Currents of archival thinking. Second edition. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited. Available at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509.

MacNeil, H. and Eastwood, T. (eds) (2017c) Currents of archival thinking. Second edition. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited. Available at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509.

MacNeil, H. and Eastwood, T. (eds) (2017d) Currents of archival thinking. Second edition. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited. Available at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509.

MacNeil, Heather and Eastwood, Terry (2010) Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Oxford: Libraries Unlimited.

Mak, B. (no date) ‘On the Uses of Authenticity’. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13381/14688.

Mancuso, L. (2013) ‘Archival appraisal in Brazil’, Archives and Manuscripts, 41(2), pp. 146–159. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2013.801101.

Marsden, C. (2001) ‘Sectors and Domains: Some reflections on co-operation and integration’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 22(1), pp. 17–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810120037469.

Marty, P.F. (2010) ‘An Introduction to Digital Convergence: Libraries, Archives, and Museums in the Information Age’, The Library Quarterly, 80(1), pp. 1–5. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/648549.

Matthews, R.J. (2015) ‘Is the archivist a "radical atheist” now? Deconstruction, its new wave, and archival activism’, Archival Science [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9248-2.

McKemmish, S. (no date) Evidence of me . . . (first published in Archives and Manucscripts, 24 (1) 1996.).

McKemmish, S., Faulkhead, S. and Russell, L. (2011) ‘Distrust in the archive: reconciling records’, Archival Science, 11(3–4), pp. 211–239. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9153-2.

McKemmish, S., Gililand, A.J. and Lau, A. (eds) (2017) Research in the archival multiverse. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: Monash University Publishing. Available at: http://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=628143.

McKemmish, S. and Piggott, M. (2013) ‘Toward the Archival Multiverse: Challenging the Binary Opposition of the Personal and Corporate Archive in Modern Archival Theory and Practice’, Archivaria, 76. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13461/14781.

McKemmish, Sue and Charles Sturt University (2005) Archives: recordkeeping in society. Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University.

McKemmish, Sue, Piggott, Michael, and Australia (1994) The Records continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives first fifty years. Clayton: Ancora Press in association with Australian Archives.

McLeod, J. (2012) ‘Thoughts on the opportunities for records professionals of the open access, open data agenda’, Records Management Journal, 22(2), pp. 92–97. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691211268711.

McLeod, J. and Hare, C. (2010) ‘Development of RMJ: A mirror of the development of the profession and discipline of records management’, Records Management Journal, 20(1), pp. 9–40. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011036215.

Meijer, A. (no date) ‘Accountability in an Information Age: Opportunities and Risks for Records Management - ProQuest’.

Menne-Haritz, A. (2001) ‘Access — The reformulation of an archival paradigm’, Archival Science, 1(1), pp. 57–82. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435639.

Michele V. Cloonan (2011) ‘The Boundaries of Preservation and Conservation Research’, Libraries & the Cultural Record, 46(2), pp. 220–229. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23053599?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Millar, L. (no date) The Death of the Fonds and the Resurrection of Provenance: Archival Context in Space and Time.

Millar, Laura (no date) ‘Explaining Ourselves: 40 Years of Archivaria’. Available at: http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13542.

Mortensen, P. (1999) The Place of Theory in Archival Practice.

Moss, M. (2005) ‘The Hutton Inquiry, the President of Nigeria and What the Butler Hoped to See’, The English Historical Review, 120(487), pp. 577–592. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei121.

Muller, Samuel et al. (2003) Manual for the arrangement and description of archives. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.

Museum Management and Curatorship - Volume 24, Issue 4 (no date). Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rmmc20/24/4.

N, Laurent and M, Hart (no date) ‘Emotional Labour and Archival Practice: Reflection’. Available at: http://www.ncarchivists.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/jsnca_vol15_laurent-hart-1.pdf.

National Audit Office (no date) ‘Challenges in Using Data Across Government’. Available at: https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Challenges-in-using-data-across-government.pdf.

Neazor, M. (2007) ‘Recordkeeping Professional Ethics and their Application’. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13146/14390.

Nesmith, T. (1999) Still Fuzzy, But More Accurate: Some Thoughts on the ‘Ghosts’ of Archival Theory.

Newman, J. (2012) ‘Revisiting Archive Collections: Developing Models for Participatory Cataloguing’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 33(1), pp. 57–73. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2012.666404.

Ngoepe, M. and Makhubela, S. (2015) ‘"Justice delayed is justice denied”’, Records Management Journal, 25(3), pp. 288–305. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-06-2015-0023.

Niu, J. (2014) ‘Event-based archival information organization’, Archival Science [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9222-4.

Niu, J. (2016) ‘Organisation and description of datasets’, Archives and Manuscripts, 44(2), pp. 73–85. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2016.1179585.

No red lines: Industry defuses ethics guidelines for artificial intelligence – AlgorithmWatch (no date). Available at: https://algorithmwatch.org/en/industry-defuses-ethics-guidelines-for-artificial-intelligence/.

Noble, S.U. (2018) Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism. New York: New York University Press. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1497317&site=ehost-live&scope=site.

O’Meara, E. and Tuomala, M. (no date) ‘Finding Balance between Archival Principles and Real-Life Practices in an Institutional Repository’. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13385/14693.

Open Government Data | Open Knowledge Foundation Blog (no date). Available at: https://doi.org/[object Object].

paradigm | workbook on digital private papers (no date).

Procter, M. (2010) ‘What’s an “Archivist”? Some Nineteenth-Century Perspectives’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 31(1), pp. 15–27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00379811003658476.

Prom, C. (2011) ‘Using Web Analytics to Improve Online Access to Archival Resources’, The American Archivist, 74(1), pp. 158–184. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.h56018515230417v.

Protocols for Native American Archival Materials (no date).

Public Sector Information | Europa - Information Society (no date).

Ramírez, M. (2009) ‘The Task of the Latino/a Archivist: On Archiving Identity and Community. Studies [eScholarship]’, InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 5(1), Article 3 [Preprint]. Available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/gseis_interactions?volume=5;issue=1.

Ramirez, M. (no date a) ‘Being Assumed Not to Be: A Critique of Whiteness as an Archival Imperative | The American Archivist’. Available at: https://americanarchivist.org/doi/full/10.17723/0360-9081.78.2.339.

Ramirez, M. (no date b) ‘Being Assumed Not to Be: A Critique of Whiteness as an Archival Imperative | The American Archivist’. Available at: https://americanarchivist.org/doi/full/10.17723/0360-9081.78.2.339.

Ray, J. (2009) ‘Sharks, digital curation, and the education of information professionals’, Museum Management and Curatorship, 24(4), pp. 357–368. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770903314720.

Reed, B. (2014) ‘Reinventing access’, Archives and Manuscripts, 42(2), pp. 123–132. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.926823.

Rekrut, A. (2014) ‘Matters of substance: materiality and meaning in historical records and their digital images’, Archives and Manuscripts, 42(3), pp. 238–247. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.958865.

‘Rethinking the Web as a Personal Archive’ (no date) Microsoft Research [Preprint]. Available at: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/rethinking-the-web-as-a-personal-archive/.

Ricardo, P. and Michelle, C. (no date) ‘Critical Directions for Archival Approaches to Social Justice’, The Library Quarterly [Preprint]. Available at: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/684145.

Ridener, John (2009) From Polders to postmodernism: a concise history of archival theory. Duluth, Minn: Litwin Books.

Riley, T. (2009) ‘Prospects in First Nations Archives: Reflections based on my participation in the Tribal Archives, Libraries and Museums Institutes and Conference programs’. Available at: http://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/47975/1/Prospects%2520-%2520final.pdf.

Riva A. Pollard (2001) ‘The Appraisal of Personal Papers: A Critical Literature Review’, Archivaria, 52. Available at: http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12818/14030.

Roberts, J. (no date a) Practice Makes Perfect, Theory Makes Theorists.

Roberts, J. (no date b) What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important? Response to Terry Eastwood’s Paper.

Robertson, T. (no date) digitization: just because you can, doesn’t mean you should – tara robertson. Available at: http://tararobertson.ca/2016/oob/.

Robinson, H. (2012) ‘Remembering things differently: museums, libraries and archives as memory institutions and the implications for convergence’, Museum Management and Curatorship, 27(4), pp. 413–429. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2012.720188.

Rolan, G. (2015) ‘Towards Archive 2.0: issues in archival systems interoperability’, Archives and Manuscripts, 43(1), pp. 42–60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.959535.

Rolan, G. (2017) ‘Agency in the archive: a model for participatory recordkeeping’, Archival Science, 17(3), pp. 195–225. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9267-7.

Roy, L., Trace, C. and Gilbert, S. (2013) Indigenous ways: assessing the awareness of and potential need for identifying content on indigenous world view in educating Libraries/Archives/Museum (LAM) entry level professionals. IFLA World Library and Information Congress, 17 - 23 August 2013, Singapore. Available at: http://library.ifla.org/108/.

Runnymede Trust (no date) Finding Common Cause: building research collaborations between universities and Black and minority ethnic communities. Available at: https://www.runnymedetrust.org/uploads/publications/Runnymede%20Common%20Cause%20briefing%20FINAL.pdf.

Russell, L. (2018) ‘Affect in the archive: trauma, grief, delight and texts. Some personal reflections’, Archives and Manuscripts, 46(2), pp. 200–207. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2018.1458324.

S. L. Ziegler (no date) ‘Digitization Selection Criteria  as Anti-Racist Action’, Code4Lib Journal [Preprint], (45). Available at: https://journal.code4lib.org/articles/14667.

Sachs, A. (2006) ‘Archives, Truth, and Reconciliation’, Archivaria, 62. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12887/14118.

Sachs, Albie (no date) ‘Archives, Truth, and Reconciliation’, Archivaria, pp. 1–14. Available at: https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_proquest200553204&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2&lang=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,archives,%20truth%20and%20reconciliation%20sachs&offset=0.

Samuels, H. (1991) ‘Improving our disposition: documentation strategy’, Archivaria, 33.

Sato, S. (2017) ‘“Operation Legacy”: Britain’s Destruction and Concealment of Colonial Records Worldwide’, The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 45(4), pp. 697–719. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03086534.2017.1294256.

‘“Say nothing”: silenced records and the Boston College subpoenas’ (no date). Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23257962.2013.859573.

Scanlan, K. (2011) ‘ARMA v. SAA: The History and Heart of Professional Friction’, The American Archivist, 74. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23079045?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Schellenberg, T. R. (1956a) Modern archives: principles and techniques. Melbourne: F.W. Cheshire. Available at: http://www2.archivists.org/publications/epubs.

Schellenberg, T. R. (1956b) Modern archives: principles and techniques. Melbourne: F.W. Cheshire.

Schellenberg, T.R. (no date) The Appraisal of Modern Records.

Schlesselman-Tarango, G. (2016) ‘The Legacy of Lady Bountiful: White Women in the Library’, Library Trends, 64(4), pp. 667–686. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2016.0015.

Schwartz, J.M. and Cook, T. (2002a) ‘Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory’, Archival Science, 2(1–2), pp. 1–19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435628.

Schwartz, J.M. and Cook, T. (2002b) ‘Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory’, Archival Science, 2(1–2), pp. 1–19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435628.

Schwartz, J.M. and Cook, T. (2002c) ‘Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory’, Archival Science, 2(1–2), pp. 1–19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435628.

SCOTT, M. (1997) ‘Functional appraisal of records: a methodology’, Records Management Journal, 7(2), pp. 101–114. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb027107.

Sellie, A. et al. (2015) ‘Interference Archive: a free space for social movement culture’, Archival Science, 15(4), pp. 453–472. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9245-5.

Sexton, A. et al. (2004) ‘Understanding users: a prerequisite for developing new technologies’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 25(1), pp. 33–49. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0037981042000199133.

Sexton, A. and Sen, D. (2018) ‘More voice, less ventriloquism– exploring the relational dynamics in a participatory archive of mental health recovery’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 24(8), pp. 874–888. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2017.1339109.

Shepherd, E. (2007) ‘Freedom of Information and Records Management in the UK: What has been the Impact?’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 28(2), pp. 125–138. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701607736.

Shepherd, E. (2009) Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Farnham: Ashgate. Available at: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780754681922.

Shepherd, E. (2015) ‘Freedom of Information, Right to Access Information, Open Data: Who is at the Table?’, The Round Table, 104(6), pp. 715–726. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2015.1112101.

Shepherd, E. (2017) ‘Pioneering women archivists in England: Ethel Stokes (1870–1944), record agent’, Archival Science, 17(2), pp. 175–194. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9272-x.

Shepherd, E., Stevenson, A. and Flinn, A. (2009) ‘The Impact of Freedom of Information on Records Management and Record Use in Local Government: A Literature Review’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 30(2), pp. 227–248. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810903445000.

Shepherd, E., Stevenson, A. and Flinn, A. (2011) ‘Records management in English local government: the effect of freedom of information’, Records Management Journal, 21(2), pp. 122–134. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111152053.

Shepherd, Elizabeth (2009) ‘Gatekeepers to the Profession: Archival e ducation, 1880–1980’, in Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Farnham: Ashgate. Available at: https://doi.org/https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780754681922/startPage/186.

Shilton, K. and Srinivasan, R. (2007) Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections.

‘Significance 2.0: a guide to assessing the significance of collections - significance-2.0.pdf’ (no date). Available at: https://www.arts.gov.au/what-we-do/museums-libraries-and-galleries/significance-20.

Sims, F. (2002) ‘A new appraisal approach for English Heritage’, Records Management Journal, 12(1), pp. 8–13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690210427743.

Sloan, K., Vanderfluit, J. and Douglas, J. (no date) ‘Not “Just my Problem to Handle”: Emerging Themes on Secondary Trauma and Archivists’. Available at: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1090&context=jcas.

Smit, F. (ed.) (2017) Archives in Liquid Times. Dutch Society for Archival Publications (S@P). Available at: http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/30942.

Stevens, M., Flinn, A. and Shepherd, E. (2010) ‘New frameworks for community engagement in the archive sector: from handing over to handing on’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(1–2), pp. 59–76. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903441770.

Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record (1998) The concept of record: report from the second Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record, 30-31 May 1996. [Stockholm]: Riksarkivet.

Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance and Sweden (1994) The principle of provenance: report from the First Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance 2-3 September 1993. [Stockholm]: Swedish National Archives.

Strauss, A. (2014) ‘Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile’, Archival Science [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3.

Sue, M. (1997) Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: A Continuum of Responsibility (Information Technology).

Sue McKemmish (2005) ‘Traces: Document, record, archive, archives’, in Archives: recordkeeping in society. Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University, pp. 1–20.

Susan Pell (2015) ‘Radicalizing the Politics of the Archive: An Ethnographic Reading of an Activist Archive’, Archivaria, 80, pp. 33–57. Available at: http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13543/14896.

Sutherland, T. (no date) ‘The Carceral Archive: Documentary Records, Narrative Construction, and Predictive Risk Assessment  « CA: Journal of Cultural Analytics’. Available at: https://culturalanalytics.org/2019/06/the-carceral-archive-documentary-records-narrative-construction-and-predictive-risk-assessment%EF%BB%BF/.

Taylor, I. (2016) ‘The German appraisal discussion since 1990: an overview’, Archives and Manuscripts, 44(1), pp. 14–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2015.1136226.

‘The Guide to Researching Audiences’ (no date).

‘The Institute of Conservation Professional Standards in Conservation’ (no date). Available at: https://www.icon.org.uk/resources/resources-for-conservation-professionals/standards-and-ethics/icon-professional-standards.html.

The National Archives (no date) ‘The United Kingdom Report on the Re-use of Public Sector Information’.

‘The National Archives Appraisal Policy Background Paper - The “Grigg System” and Beyond’ (no date).

‘The National Geospatial Digital Archives—Collection Development: Lessons Learned’ (2009) Library Trends, 57(3), pp. 490–515. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.0.0049.

Theimer, K. (2011) ‘What Is the Meaning of Archives 2.0?’, The American Archivist, 74(1), pp. 58–68. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.h7tn4m4027407666.

Thethi, J. (no date) Archives and Inclusivity: Respectful descriptions of marginalised groups. – Intersectional GLAM. Available at: https://intersectionalglam.home.blog/2018/11/22/archives-and-inclusivity-respectful-descriptions-of-marginalised-groups/.

Thorpe, K. (2013) Protocols for libraries and archives in Australia: incorporating Indigenous perspectives in the information field. IFLA World Library and Information Congress, 17 - 23 August 2013, Singapore. Available at: http://library.ifla.org/99/.

Thurston, A. (2014) Integrity in government through records management: essays in honour of Anne Thurston. Edited by J. Lowry and J. Wamukoya. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate.

Timms, K. (no date) New Partnerships for Old Sibling Rivals: The Development of Integrated Access Systems for the Holdings of Archives, Libraries and Museums. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13230/14549.

Tom Nesmith (2002) ‘Seeing Archives: Postmodernism and the Changing Intellectual Place of Archives’, American Archivist, 65. Available at: https://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.65.1.rr48450509r0712u.

Tough, A. (2011) ‘Accountability, open government and record keeping: time to think again?’, Records Management Journal, 21(3), pp. 225–236. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111186894.

Trace, C.B. (2002) ‘What is recorded is never simply “what happened”: Record keeping in modern organizational culture’, Archival Science, 2(1–2), pp. 137–159. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435634.

Tschan, R. (2002) ‘A Comparison of Jenkinson and Schellenberg on Appraisal’, The American Archivist, 65(2), pp. 176–195. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.65.2.920w65g3217706l1.

Upward, F. (2000) ‘Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond: a personal reflection’, Records Management Journal, 10(3), pp. 115–139. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007259.

Upward, Frank (1996) Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties.

Upward, Frank (no date) Structuring the Records Continuum, Part Two: Structuration Theory and Recordkeeping.

Valge, J. and Kibal, B. (2007) ‘Restrictions on Access to Archives and Records in Europe: A History and the Current Situation’, Journal of the Society of Archivists, 28(2), pp. 193–214. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701611951.

Vilar, P. and Sauperl, A. (2015) ‘Archives, Quo Vadis et Cum Quibus?: Archivists’ self-perceptions and perceptions of users of contemporary archives’, International Journal of Information Management, 35(5), pp. 551–560. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.06.001.

Vukliš, V (no date) ‘Archival Activism: Emerging Forms, Local Applications’. Available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/112790sz#page-1.

Wakimoto, D.K., Bruce, C. and Partridge, H. (2013) ‘Archivist as activist: lessons from three queer community archives in California’, Archival Science, 13(4), pp. 293–316. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9201-1.

Wallace, David A. and Cox, Richard J. (2002a) Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. London: Quorum Books. Available at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=74622&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451.

Wallace, David A. and Cox, Richard J. (2002b) Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. London: Quorum Books. Available at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=74622&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451.

Wamukoya, J. (2000) ‘Records and archives as a basis for good government: implications and challenges for records managers and archivists in Africa’, Records Management Journal, 10(1), pp. 23–33. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007254.

Waterton, E. and Smith, L. (2010) ‘The recognition and misrecognition of community heritage’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(1–2), pp. 4–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903441671.

We Already Are - Sustainable Futures - Medium (no date a). Available at: https://medium.com/community-archives/we-already-are-52438b863e31.

We Already Are - Sustainable Futures - Medium (no date b). Available at: https://medium.com/community-archives/we-already-are-52438b863e31.

Welland, S. and Cossham, A. (2019) ‘Defining the undefinable: an analysis of definitions of community archives’, Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 68(8/9), pp. 617–634. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-04-2019-0049.

When Archivists and Digital Asset Managers Collide: Tensions and Ways Forward | The American Archivist (no date). Available at: http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.121.

Williams, C. (no date) Studying Reality: The Application of Theory in an Aspect of UK Practice.

Wilson, J.Z. and Golding, F. (2016) ‘Latent scrutiny: personal archives as perpetual mementos of the official gaze’, Archival Science, 16(1), pp. 93–109. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9255-3.

Wisniewski, Timothy. (2008) ‘Framers of the Kept: Against the Grain Appraisal of Ephemeral Moving Images’, The Moving Image, 7(2), pp. 1–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/mov.2008.0002.

Wood, S. et al. (2014) ‘Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights’, Archival Science, 14(3–4), pp. 397–419. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9233-1.

Wooldridge, J.M. (2013) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. 5th ed. Mason, Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning.

WORTHY, B. (2010) ‘More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government’, Governance, 23(4), pp. 561–582. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.x.

Worthy, B. and Hazell, R. (2017) ‘Disruptive, Dynamic and Democratic? Ten Years of FOI in the UK’, Parliamentary Affairs, 70(1), pp. 22–42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv069.

Wright, K. (2019) ‘Archival interventions and the language we use’, Archival Science [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09306-y.

Yaco, S. and Hardy, B.B. (2013) ‘Historians, archivists, and social activism: benefits and costs’, Archival Science, 13(2–3), pp. 253–272. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9187-0.

Yakel, E. and Bost, L.L. (no date) ‘Understanding Administrative Use and Users in University Archives - American Archivist - Volume 57, Number 4 / Fall 1994 - Society of American Archivists’, The American Archivist [Preprint]. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40293870.

Yakel, E. and Torres, D. (2003) ‘AI: Archival Intelligence and User Expertise’, The American Archivist, 66(1), pp. 51–78. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.66.1.q022h85pn51n5800.

Yeo, G. (2007) ‘Concepts of Record (1): Evidence, Information, and Persistent Representations’, The American Archivist, 70(2), pp. 315–343. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.70.2.u327764v1036756q.

Yeo, G. (2008) ‘Concepts of Record (2): Prototypes and Boundary Objects’, The American Archivist, 71(1), pp. 118–143. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.71.1.p0675v40tr14q6w2.

Yeo, G. (2010) ‘“Nothing is the same as something else”: significant properties and notions of identity and originality’, Archival Science, 10(2), pp. 85–116. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-010-9119-9.

Yeo, G. (2011) ‘Rising to the level of a record? Some thoughts on records and documents’, Records Management Journal, 21(1), pp. 8–27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111125071.

Yeo, G. (no date) ‘Bringing Things Together: Aggregate Records in a Digital Age’. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13407/14713.

Zhang, J. (no date) ‘Original Order in Digital Archives’. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13410/14719.