1
Caswell, ML. "’The Archive’ Is Not an Archives: On Acknowledging the Intellectual Contributions of Archival Studies”. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7bn4v1fk
2
BS ISO 15489-1:2016 Information and documentation. Records management. Concepts and principles. BSI 2016. https://bsol.bsigroup.com/Bibliographic/BibliographicInfoData/000000000030298891
3
Sue McKemmish. Traces: Document, record, archive, archives. In: Archives: recordkeeping in society. Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: : Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University 2005. 1–20.
4
Yeo G. Concepts of Record (1): Evidence, Information, and Persistent Representations. The American Archivist 2007;70:315–43. doi:10.17723/aarc.70.2.u327764v1036756q
5
Schellenberg, T. R. Modern archives: principles and techniques. Melbourne: : F.W. Cheshire 1956. http://www2.archivists.org/publications/epubs
6
MacNeil H, Eastwood T, editors. Currents of archival thinking. Second edition. Santa Barbara, California: : Libraries Unlimited 2017. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
7
Jenkinson, Hilary, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Manual of archive administration. 1922. http://www2.archivists.org/publications/epubs
8
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives. Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. London: : Facet Publishing 2016. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1424541&site=ehost-live&scope=site
9
Rekrut A. Matters of substance: materiality and meaning in historical records and their digital images. Archives and Manuscripts 2014;42:238–47. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.958865
10
Smit F, editor. Archives in Liquid Times. Dutch Society for Archival Publications (S@P) 2017. http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/30942
11
Dever M. Photographs and manuscripts: working in the archive. Archives and Manuscripts 2014;42:282–94. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.956322
12
Acker A. How cells became records: standardization and infrastructure in tissue culture. Archival Science 2015;15:1–24. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9213-x
13
Gilliland AJ, Caswell M. Records and their imaginaries: imagining the impossible, making possible the imagined. Archival Science Published Online First: 7 November 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9259-z
14
Upward F. Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond: a personal reflection. Records Management Journal 2000;10:115–39. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007259
15
Yeo G. Concepts of Record (2): Prototypes and Boundary Objects. The American Archivist 2008;71:118–43. doi:10.17723/aarc.71.1.p0675v40tr14q6w2
16
InterPARES 3 Intellectual Framework.
17
Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record. The concept of record: report from the second Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record, 30-31 May 1996. [Stockholm]: : Riksarkivet 1998.
18
Wooldridge JM. Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. 5th ed. Mason, Ohio: : South-Western Cengage Learning 2013.
19
Duranti, Luciana, Thibodeau, Kenneth. The Concept of Record in Interactive, Experiential and Dynamic Environments: the View of InterPARES*. Archival Science 2006;6:13–68. doi:10.1007/s10502-006-9021-7
20
Atherton, Jay. From Life Cycle to Continuum: Some Thoughts on the Records Management - Archives Relationship. Archiviria 1985.
21
Kahle B. Universal Access to All Knowledge. The American Archivist 2007;70:23–31. doi:10.17723/aarc.70.1.u114006770252845
22
Craven, Louise. What are archives?: cultural and theoretical perspectives : a reader. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2008. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.4324/9781315547497
23
Duranti, Luciana, Preston, Randy, InterPARES Project, et al. International reseach on permanent authentic records in electronic systems (InterPARES) 2: Experimental, interactive and dynamic records. Padova: : CLEUP 2008.
24
Heather M. Conceptualizing an Authentic Electronic Record. 2000.
25
McKemmish, Sue, Piggott, Michael, Australia. The Records continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives first fifty years. Clayton: : Ancora Press in association with Australian Archives 1994.
26
Sue M. Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: A Continuum of Responsibility (Information Technology). 1997.
27
Schwartz JM, Cook T. Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science 2002;2:1–19. doi:10.1007/BF02435628
28
Trace CB. What is recorded is never simply ‘what happened’: Record keeping in modern organizational culture. Archival Science 2002;2:137–59. doi:10.1007/BF02435634
29
Upward, Frank. Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties. 1996.
30
Upward, Frank. Structuring the Records Continuum, Part Two: Structuration Theory and Recordkeeping.
31
InterPARES 1 Template for Analysis.
32
Yeo G. Rising to the level of a record? Some thoughts on records and documents. Records Management Journal 2011;21:8–27. doi:10.1108/09565691111125071
33
Yeo G. ‘Nothing is the same as something else’: significant properties and notions of identity and originality. Archival Science 2010;10:85–116.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-010-9119-9
34
Frank Upward. Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology). 1996.
35
Ketelaar E. Cultivating archives: meanings and identities. Archival Science 2012;12:19–33. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9142-5
36
Cumming K. Ways of seeing: contextualising the continuum. Records Management Journal 2010;20:41–52. doi:10.1108/09565691011036224
37
MacNeil H, Eastwood T, editors. Currents of archival thinking. Second edition. Santa Barbara, California: : Libraries Unlimited 2017. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
38
Ngoepe M, Makhubela S. "Justice delayed is justice denied”. Records Management Journal 2015;25:288–305. doi:10.1108/RMJ-06-2015-0023
39
Lemieux VL. The records-risk nexus: exploring the relationship between records and risk. Records Management Journal 2010;20:199–216. doi:10.1108/09565691011064331
40
Dirks J. Accountability, History, and Archives: Conflicting Priorities or Synthesized Strands? Archivaria 2004;57.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/viewFile/12451/13554
41
Birkinshaw P. Freedom of information and its impact in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly 2010;27:312–21. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.006
42
Longmore B. The Public Records (Scotland) Act 2011: creating a culture that values public records. Archives and Records 2013;34:248–62. doi:10.1080/23257962.2013.830067
43
Worthy B, Hazell R. Disruptive, Dynamic and Democratic? Ten Years of FOI in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs 2017;70:22–42. doi:10.1093/pa/gsv069
44
Moss M. The Hutton Inquiry, the President of Nigeria and What the Butler Hoped to See. The English Historical Review 2005;120:577–92. doi:10.1093/ehr/cei121
45
Thurston A. Integrity in government through records management: essays in honour of Anne Thurston. Farnham, Surrey, England: : Ashgate 2014.
46
‘Say nothing’: silenced records and the Boston College subpoenas. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23257962.2013.859573
47
Henttonen P. Privacy as an archival problem and a solution. Archival Science 2017;17:285–303. doi:10.1007/s10502-017-9277-0
48
Shepherd E. Freedom of Information, Right to Access Information, Open Data: Who is at the Table? The Round Table 2015;104:715–26. doi:10.1080/00358533.2015.1112101
49
Duchein M. The History of European Archives and the Development of the Archival Profession in Europe. The American Archivist 1992;55:14–25. doi:10.17723/aarc.55.1.k17n44g856577888
50
WORTHY B. More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government. Governance 2010;23:561–82. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.x
51
Birkinshaw P. Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal. 4th ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844904
52
Birkinshaw P. Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation. 3rd ed. Haywards Heath: : Tottel 2005.
53
Legislation and regulations | The National Archives. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/legislation/
54
Wallace, David A., Cox, Richard J. Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. London: : Quorum Books 2002. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=74622&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
55
MacNeil, Heather, Eastwood, Terry. Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Oxford: : Libraries Unlimited 2010.
56
Shepherd E, Stevenson A, Flinn A. The Impact of Freedom of Information on Records Management and Record Use in Local Government: A Literature Review. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2009;30:227–48. doi:10.1080/00379810903445000
57
Shepherd E. Freedom of Information and Records Management in the UK: What has been the Impact? Journal of the Society of Archivists 2007;28:125–38. doi:10.1080/00379810701607736
58
Holmlund, Mona, Avery, Cheryl. Better off forgetting?: essays on archives, public policy, and collective memory. London: : University of Toronto Press 2010. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/9781442689879
59
McLeod J. Thoughts on the opportunities for records professionals of the open access, open data agenda. Records Management Journal 2012;22:92–7. doi:10.1108/09565691211268711
60
Shepherd E, Stevenson A, Flinn A. Records management in English local government: the effect of freedom of information. Records Management Journal 2011;21:122–34. doi:10.1108/09565691111152053
61
McKemmish S, Faulkhead S, Russell L. Distrust in the archive: reconciling records. Archival Science 2011;11:211–39. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9153-2
62
Tough A. Accountability, open government and record keeping: time to think again? Records Management Journal 2011;21:225–36. doi:10.1108/09565691111186894
63
Birkinshaw P. Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation. 3rd ed. Haywards Heath: : Tottel 2005.
64
Birkinshaw P. Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal. 4th ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844904
65
Interview with Dr Anne Thurston on Open Government and trustworthy records | Gov 2.0 Radio.
66
Wallace, David A., Cox, Richard J. Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. London: : Quorum Books 2002. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=74622&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
67
Meijer A. Accountability in an Information Age: Opportunities and Risks for Records Management - ProQuest.
68
Jimerson RC. Ripples across the pond: global implications of the Heiner Affair. 2011;39.
69
Hurley C. Archivists and Accountability. 2006;34.
70
McKemmish, Sue, Charles Sturt University. Archives: recordkeeping in society. Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: : Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University 2005.
71
Wamukoya J. Records and archives as a basis for good government: implications and challenges for records managers and archivists in Africa. Records Management Journal 2000;10:23–33. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007254
72
Cox, Richard J. Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world. London: : Facet 2006.
73
Caron DJ, Kellerhals A. Supporting Democratic Values Through a Relevant Documentary Foundation - An Evolutionary Complex.
74
Public Sector Information | Europa - Information Society.
75
Hurley C. Recordkeeping, Document Destruction and the Law (Heiner, Enron and McCabe). 2002;30.
76
Council of Europe. Access to official documents Recommendation Rec (2002) 2 of the Committee of Ministers and explanatory memorandum. 2003.
77
Open Government Data | Open Knowledge Foundation Blog. doi:[object Object]
78
Valge J, Kibal B. Restrictions on Access to Archives and Records in Europe: A History and the Current Situation. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2007;28:193–214. doi:10.1080/00379810701611951
79
Council of Europe - Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents (CETS No. 205). 2009.
80
The National Archives. The United Kingdom Report on the Re-use of Public Sector Information.
81
Critical Archival Studies: An Introduction | Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies. doi:https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.50
82
L, Hughes-Watkins. Moving Toward a Reparative Archive: A Roadmap for a Holistic Approach to Disrupting Homogenous Histories in Academic Repositories and Creating Inclusive Spaces for Marginalized Voices. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&context=jcas
83
Sachs, Albie. Archives, Truth, and Reconciliation. Archivaria;:1–14.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_proquest200553204&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2&lang=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,archives,%20truth%20and%20reconciliation%20sachs&offset=0
84
Harris V. Antonyms of our remembering. Archival Science 2014;14:215–29. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9221-5
85
Archival Amnesty: In Search of Black American Transitional and Restorative Justice | Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies. doi:https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.42
86
We Already Are - Sustainable Futures - Medium. https://medium.com/community-archives/we-already-are-52438b863e31
87
Cifor M. Affecting relations: introducing affect theory to archival discourse. Archival Science 2016;16:7–31. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9261-5
88
An Archive of Feelings: Trauma, Sexuality, and Lesbian Public Cultures | Books Gateway | Duke University Press. https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/773/An-Archive-of-FeelingsTrauma-Sexuality-and-Lesbian
89
Russell L. Affect in the archive: trauma, grief, delight and texts. Some personal reflections. Archives and Manuscripts 2018;46:200–7. doi:10.1080/01576895.2018.1458324
90
N, Laurent, M, Hart. Emotional Labour and Archival Practice: Reflection. http://www.ncarchivists.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/jsnca_vol15_laurent-hart-1.pdf
91
Gilliland AJ, Caswell M. Records and their imaginaries: imagining the impossible, making possible the imagined. Archival Science 2016;16:53–75. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9259-z
92
Wilson JZ, Golding F. Latent scrutiny: personal archives as perpetual mementos of the official gaze. Archival Science 2016;16:93–109. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9255-3
93
Sloan K, Vanderfluit J, Douglas J. Not ‘Just my Problem to Handle’: Emerging Themes on Secondary Trauma and Archivists. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1090&context=jcas
94
Duff WM, Flinn A, Suurtamm KE, et al. Social justice impact of archives: a preliminary investigation. Archival Science 2013;13:317–48. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9198-x
95
Dunbar AW. Introducing critical race theory to archival discourse: getting the conversation started. Archival Science 2006;6:109–29. doi:10.1007/s10502-006-9022-6
96
Confronting Our Failure of Care Around the Legacies of Marginalized People in the Archives. https://medium.com/on-archivy/confronting-our-failure-of-care-around-the-legacies-of-marginalized-people-in-the-archives-dc4180397280
97
Gilliland A. Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twenty-first century. Archival Science 2011;11:193–209. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9147-0
98
Greene, Mark A. A Critique of Social Justice as an Archival Imperative: What Is It We’re Doing That’s All That Important? The American Archivist 2012;76:302–34.https://www.jstor.org/stable/43490357?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
99
Jimerson R. Archivists and Social Responsibility: A Response to Mark Greene. The American Archivist 2013;76:335–45. doi:10.17723/aarc.76.2.2627p15350572t21
100
Caswell M. Not Just Between Us: A Riposte to Mark Greene / Letter to the Editor. American Archivist 2013;76.http://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.76.2.89324135v02r2q74
101
Ramirez M. Being Assumed Not to Be: A Critique of Whiteness as an Archival Imperative | The American Archivist. https://americanarchivist.org/doi/full/10.17723/0360-9081.78.2.339
102
Ishmael HJM. Reclaiming history: Arthur Schomburg. Archives and Manuscripts 2018;46:269–88. doi:10.1080/01576895.2018.1559741
103
Critical Archival Studies: An Introduction | Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies. doi:https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.50
104
Ramirez M. Being Assumed Not to Be: A Critique of Whiteness as an Archival Imperative | The American Archivist. https://americanarchivist.org/doi/full/10.17723/0360-9081.78.2.339
105
Brilmyer G. Center for the Study of Women | Why Disability Studies for Archives? | Center for the Study of Women. https://csw.ucla.edu/2018/07/13/why-disability-studies-for-archives/
106
Schlesselman-Tarango G. The Legacy of Lady Bountiful: White Women in the Library. Library Trends 2016;64:667–86. doi:10.1353/lib.2016.0015
107
Identifying and Dismantling White Supremacy in Archives. http://www.gracenbrilmyer.com/dismantling_whiteSupremacy_archives3.pdf
108
Goudarouli E, Sexton A, Sheridan J. The Challenge of the Digital and the Future Archive: Through the Lens of The National Archives UK. Philosophy & Technology 2019;32:173–83. doi:10.1007/s13347-018-0333-3
109
Duranti L. Whose truth? Records and archives as evidence in the era of post-truth and disinformation. In: Brown C, ed. Archival Futures. Facet 2018. 19–32. doi:10.29085/9781783302192.003
110
How Archivists Could Stop Deepfakes From Rewriting History. https://gizmodo.com/how-archivists-could-stop-deepfakes-from-rewriting-hist-1829666009
111
Robertson T. digitization: just because you can, doesn’t mean you should – tara robertson. http://tararobertson.ca/2016/oob/
112
Noble SU. Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism. New York: : New York University Press 2018. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1497317&site=ehost-live&scope=site
113
Sutherland T. The Carceral Archive: Documentary Records, Narrative Construction, and Predictive Risk Assessment « CA: Journal of Cultural Analytics. https://culturalanalytics.org/2019/06/the-carceral-archive-documentary-records-narrative-construction-and-predictive-risk-assessment%EF%BB%BF/
114
S. L. Ziegler. Digitization Selection Criteria as Anti-Racist Action. Code4Lib Journalhttps://journal.code4lib.org/articles/14667
115
Cook T. ‘We Are What We Keep; We Keep What We Are’: Archival Appraisal Past, Present and Future. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2011;32:173–89. doi:10.1080/00379816.2011.619688
116
Anne G. The Archival Paradigm: The Genesis and Rationales of Archival Principles and Practices: Council on Library and Information Resources. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub89/archival.html
117
Thethi J. Archives and Inclusivity: Respectful descriptions of marginalised groups. – Intersectional GLAM. https://intersectionalglam.home.blog/2018/11/22/archives-and-inclusivity-respectful-descriptions-of-marginalised-groups/
118
Wright K. Archival interventions and the language we use. Archival Science Published Online First: 15 May 2019. doi:10.1007/s10502-019-09306-y
119
Mortensen P. The Place of Theory in Archival Practice. 1999.
120
Lager Vestberg N. Archival Value. Photographies 2008;1:49–65. doi:10.1080/17540760701786725
121
International Council on Archives. Statement of Principles Regarding Archival Description. Archivaria 1992;1.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11837/12789
122
Cook, Terry. What is Past is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas Since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift. Archiviaria 1997;:17–63.
123
Groth P, Gil Y, Cheney J, et al. Requirements for Provenance on the Web. International Journal of Digital Curation 2012;7. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.213
124
Duranti L. From Digital Diplomatics to Digital Records Forensics. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13229/14548
125
Millar L. The Death of the Fonds and the Resurrection of Provenance: Archival Context in Space and Time.
126
MacNeil H. Providing Grounds for Trust II: The Findings of the Authenticty Task Force of InterPARES.
127
Ketelaar E. Archival Theory and the Dutch Manual.
128
Cook, Terry. The Concept of the Archival Fonds in the Post-Custodial Era: Theory, Problems and Solutions. Archivaria 1993;35.
129
Muller, Samuel, Feith, Johan Adriaan, Fruin, R., et al. Manual for the arrangement and description of archives. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2003.
130
Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance, Sweden. The principle of provenance: report from the First Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance 2-3 September 1993. [Stockholm]: : Swedish National Archives 1994.
131
Brothman B. Orders of Value: Probing the Theoretical Terms of Archival Practice. 1991.
132
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 1. 1989.
133
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 2. 1989.
134
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 3. 1990.
135
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 4. 1990.
136
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 5. 1991.
137
Duranti, Luciana. Diplomatics: new uses for an old science. Lanham, Md: : Scarecrow Press 1998.
138
Duranti L. Reliability and Authenticity: The Concepts and Their Implications.
139
Duranti L, MacNeil H. The Protection of the Integrity of Electronic Records: An Overview of the UBC-MAS Research Project.
140
Eastwood T. Nailing a Little Jelly to the Wall of Archival Studies. 1993.
141
Eastwood T. What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important?
142
Horsman P. The Last Dance of the Phoenix, or the De-discovery of the Archival Fonds.
143
MacNeil H. Archival Theory and Practice: Between Two Paradigms.
144
Nesmith T. Still Fuzzy, But More Accurate: Some Thoughts on the ‘Ghosts’ of Archival Theory. 1999.
145
Ridener, John. From Polders to postmodernism: a concise history of archival theory. Duluth, Minn: : Litwin Books 2009.
146
Roberts J. Practice Makes Perfect, Theory Makes Theorists.
147
Roberts J. What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important? Response to Terry Eastwood’s Paper.
148
Duranti L. Concepts and principles for the management of electronic records, or records management theory is archival diplomatics. Records Management Journal 2010;20:78–95. doi:10.1108/09565691011039852
149
Mak B. On the Uses of Authenticity. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13381/14688
150
Geoffrey Yeo. The Conceptual Fonds and the Physical Collection. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13384/14691
151
Yeo G. Bringing Things Together: Aggregate Records in a Digital Age. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13407/14713
152
Zhang J. Original Order in Digital Archives. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13410/14719
153
Duranti L. Origin and Development of the Concept of Archival Description | Duranti | Archivaria. Archivaria 1992;35.https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/92f1/d3b23cfc46f8c4ed7638ca58fac9c05c4574.pdf
154
O’Meara E, Tuomala M. Finding Balance between Archival Principles and Real-Life Practices in an Institutional Repository. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13385/14693
155
Fear K, Donaldson DR. Provenance and credibility in scientific data repositories. Archival Science 2012;12:319–39. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9172-7
156
Williams C. Studying Reality: The Application of Theory in an Aspect of UK Practice.
157
Bazerman C. The orders of documents, the orders of activity, and the orders of information. Archival Science 2012;12:377–88. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9178-1
158
Bunn J. Questioning autonomy: an alternative perspective on the principles which govern archival description. Archival Science Published Online First: 12 March 2013. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9200-2
159
Findlay C. Archival activism. Archives and Manuscripts 2016;44:155–9. doi:10.1080/01576895.2016.1263964
160
Cook T. Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms. Archival Science 2013;13:95–120. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7
161
Bastian J. Taking Custody, Giving Access: A Postcustodial Role for a New Century. Archivaria 2002.
162
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives. Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. London: : Facet Publishing 2016. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1424541&site=ehost-live&scope=site
163
ARMA Information Governance Professional Code of Ethics. https://www.arma.org/page/IGP_Ethics
164
Archives and Records Association Code of Ethics. https://www.archives.org.uk/ara-code-of-ethics
165
Caswell M. On archival pluralism: what religious pluralism (and its critics) can teach us about archives. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-012-9197-y
166
McKemmish S, Gililand AJ, Lau A, editors. Research in the archival multiverse. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: : Monash University Publishing 2017. http://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=628143
167
McKemmish S, Piggott M. Toward the Archival Multiverse: Challenging the Binary Opposition of the Personal and Corporate Archive in Modern Archival Theory and Practice. Archivaria 2013;76.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13461/14781
168
Cox, Richard J. Rethinking Archival Ethics. Journal of Information Ethics;22:13–20.https://search.proquest.com/docview/1661892025?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
169
Neazor M. Recordkeeping Professional Ethics and their Application. Published Online First: 2007.http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13146/14390
170
Jimerson RC. Ethical Concerns for Archivists. The Public Historian 2006;28:87–92. doi:10.1525/tph.2006.28.1.87
171
Dingwall G. Trusting Archivists: The Role of Archival Ethics Codes in Establishing Public Faith. The American Archivist 2004;67:11–30. doi:10.17723/aarc.67.1.mw0914r2p52xx2t4
172
Gale C. Record-keeping as an ethical imperative. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2006;27:17–27. doi:10.1080/00039810600691221
173
Benedict, Karen M., Society of American Archivists. Ethics and the archival profession: introduction and case studies. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2003.
174
Cook M. Professional ethics and practice in archives and records management in a human rights context ∗. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2006;27:1–15. doi:10.1080/00039810600691205
175
Danielson, Elena S. The ethical archivist. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2010.
176
Cox, Richard J. Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world. London: : Facet 2006.
177
Menne-Haritz A. Access — The reformulation of an archival paradigm. Archival Science 2001;1:57–82. doi:10.1007/BF02435639
178
Vukliš, V. Archival Activism: Emerging Forms, Local Applications. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/112790sz#page-1
179
Jenkinson H. A manual of archive administration. 2nd ed. reprinted. Lund, Humphries 1965.
180
Schellenberg, T. R. Modern archives: principles and techniques. Melbourne: : F.W. Cheshire 1956.
181
Cook T. Fashionable Nonsense or Professional Rebirth: Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives. Archivaria 2001;51.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12792/13989
182
Cook T. Electronic Records, Paper Minds: The Revolution in Information Management and Archives in the Post-Custodial and Post-Modernist Era. Archives & Social Studies 2007.
183
Brothman B. Declining Derrida: Integrity, Tensegrity, and the Preservation of Archives from Deconstruction. Archivaria 1999;48.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12717/13894
184
Bastian J. A Question of Custody: The Colonial Archives of the United States Virgin Islands. The American Archivist 2001;64:96–114. doi:10.17723/aarc.64.1.h6k872252u2gr377
185
MacNeil H. Trusting Records in a Postmodern World. Archivaria 2001;51.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12793/13991
186
Tom Nesmith. Seeing Archives: Postmodernism and the Changing Intellectual Place of Archives. American Archivist 2002;65.https://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.65.1.rr48450509r0712u
187
Ham G. Archival Strategies for the Post-Custodial Era. The American Archivist 1981;44–3.
188
Harris V. Claiming Less, Delivering More: A Critique of Positivist Formulations on Archives in South Africa. Archivaria 1997;44.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12200/13217
189
Derrida, Jacques, Prenowitz, Eric. Archive fever: a Freudian impression. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1996.
190
Cook T. Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts. Archival Science 2001;1:3–24. doi:10.1007/BF02435636
191
Cook T, Schwartz JM. Archives, records, and power: From (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance. Archival Science 2002;2:171–85. doi:10.1007/BF02435620
192
Reed B. Reinventing access. Archives and Manuscripts 2014;42:123–32. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.926823
193
Vilar P, Sauperl A. Archives, Quo Vadis et Cum Quibus?: Archivists’ self-perceptions and perceptions of users of contemporary archives. International Journal of Information Management 2015;35:551–60. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.06.001
194
Flanagan M, Carini P. How Games Can Help Us Access and Understand Archival Images. The American Archivist 2012;75:514–37. doi:10.17723/aarc.75.2.b424537w27970gu4
195
Duff W, Johnson C. Where Is the List with All the Names? Information-Seeking Behavior of Genealogists. The American Archivist 2003;66:79–95. doi:10.17723/aarc.66.1.l375uj047224737n
196
Prom C. Using Web Analytics to Improve Online Access to Archival Resources. The American Archivist 2011;74:158–84. doi:10.17723/aarc.74.1.h56018515230417v
197
Fear K. User Understanding of Metadata in Digital Image Collections: Or, What Exactly Do You Mean by ‘Coverage’? The American Archivist 2010;73:26–60. doi:10.17723/aarc.73.1.j00044lr77415551
198
Daniels M, Yakel E. Seek and You May Find: Successful Search in Online Finding Aid Systems. The American Archivist 2010;73:535–68. doi:10.17723/aarc.73.2.p578900680650357
199
Altman B, Nemmers J. The Usability of On-line Archival Resources: The Polaris Project Finding Aid. The American Archivist 2001;64:121–31. doi:10.17723/aarc.64.1.80300272655rqu74
200
Yakel E, Bost LL. Understanding Administrative Use and Users in University Archives - American Archivist - Volume 57, Number 4 / Fall 1994 - Society of American Archivists. The American Archivisthttp://www.jstor.org/stable/40293870
201
Yakel E, Torres D. AI: Archival Intelligence and User Expertise. The American Archivist 2003;66:51–78. doi:10.17723/aarc.66.1.q022h85pn51n5800
202
The Guide to Researching Audiences.
203
Daines JG, Nimer CL. Re-Imagining Archival Display: Creating User-Friendly Finding Aids. Journal of Archival Organization 2011;9:4–31. doi:10.1080/15332748.2011.574019
204
Sexton A, Turner C, Yeo G, et al. Understanding users: a prerequisite for developing new technologies. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2004;25:33–49. doi:10.1080/0037981042000199133
205
Chapman A. Collection-level description: Joining up the domains. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2004;25:149–55. doi:10.1080/0037981042000271475
206
Hill A. Serving the invisible researcher: Meeting the needs of online users. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2004;25:139–48. doi:10.1080/0037981042000271466
207
Lowry J. Radical empathy, the imaginary and affect in (post)colonial records: how to break out of international stalemates on displaced archives. Archival Science 2019;19:185–203. doi:10.1007/s10502-019-09305-z
208
Sato S. ‘Operation Legacy’: Britain’s Destruction and Concealment of Colonial Records Worldwide. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 2017;45:697–719. doi:10.1080/03086534.2017.1294256
209
Espinal, Isabel. A Holistic Approach for Inclusive Librarianship: Decentering Whiteness in Our Profession. Library Trends 2018;67:147–62.https://search.proquest.com/docview/2130845198?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511
210
Schwartz JM, Cook T. Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science 2002;2:1–19. doi:10.1007/BF02435628
211
Lamont J. Records Management: An Expanding Role. http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/Editorial/Features/Records-management-an-expanding-role-96372.aspx
212
Broady-Preston J. The information professional of the future: polymath or dinosaur? Library Management 2010;31:66–78. doi:10.1108/01435121011013412
213
Procter M. What’s an ‘Archivist’? Some Nineteenth-Century Perspectives. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2010;31:15–27. doi:10.1080/00379811003658476
214
Scanlan K. ARMA v. SAA: The History and Heart of Professional Friction. The American Archivist 2011;74.http://www.jstor.org/stable/23079045?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
215
Millar, Laura. Explaining Ourselves: 40 Years of Archivaria. http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13542
216
Ismail A, Jamaludin A. Records professionals: an invisible profession in Malaysia. Records Management Journal 2011;21:69–75. doi:10.1108/09565691111125116
217
Cline S. ‘To the Limit of Our Integrity’: Reflections on Archival Being. The American Archivist 2009;72:331–43. doi:10.17723/aarc.72.2.g0321510717r6j14
218
Shepherd, Elizabeth. Gatekeepers to the Profession: Archival e ducation, 1880–1980. In: Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Farnham: : Ashgate 2009. doi:https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780754681922/startPage/186
219
Jenkinson, Hilary. The English archivist: a new profession. London: : H.K. Lewis 1948.
220
Elizabeth G, Rebecca S. ‘Golden Age,’ Quiescence, and Revival: How the Sociology of Professions Became the Study of Knowledge-Based Work. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258200542_Golden_Age_Quiescence_and_Revival
221
Currall J, Moss M. We are archivists, but are we OK? Records Management Journal 2008;18:69–91. doi:10.1108/09565690810858532
222
McLeod J, Hare C. Development of RMJ: A mirror of the development of the profession and discipline of records management. Records Management Journal 2010;20:9–40. doi:10.1108/09565691011036215
223
Cline S. "Dust Clouds of Camels Shall Cover You”: Covenant and the Archival Endeavor. American Archivist Published Online First: 2012.https://americanarchivist.org/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.75.2.03193j1517858r34
224
Shepherd E. Pioneering women archivists in England: Ethel Stokes (1870–1944), record agent. Archival Science 2017;17:175–94. doi:10.1007/s10502-016-9272-x
225
Lappin J. What will be the next records management orthodoxy? Records Management Journal 2010;20:252–64. doi:10.1108/09565691011095283
226
Ceeney N. The Role of a 21st-century National Archive—The Relevance of the Jenkinsonian Tradition, and a Redefinition for the Information Society. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2008;29:57–71. doi:10.1080/00379810802499868
227
Shepherd E. Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Farnham: : Ashgate 2009. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780754681922
228
Gauld C. Democratising or privileging: the democratisation of knowledge and the role of the archivist. Archival Science Published Online First: 12 November 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9262-4
229
Hall S. Constituting an archive. Third Text 2001;15:89–92. doi:10.1080/09528820108576903
230
Against Precarity: Towards a Community-Based Notion of Fiscal Sustainability. https://medium.com/community-archives/against-precarity-towards-a-community-based-notion-of-fiscal-sustainability-815d1d889309
231
Flinn A, Stevens M, Shepherd E. Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream. Archival Science 2009;9:71–86. doi:10.1007/s10502-009-9105-2
232
Sexton A, Sen D. More voice, less ventriloquism– exploring the relational dynamics in a participatory archive of mental health recovery. International Journal of Heritage Studies 2018;24:874–88. doi:10.1080/13527258.2017.1339109
233
We Already Are - Sustainable Futures - Medium. https://medium.com/community-archives/we-already-are-52438b863e31
234
Eveleigh A. Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives, ICA Congress Brisbane 2012. 2012. http://ica2012.ica.org/files/pdf/Full%20papers%20upload/ica12Final00128.pdf
235
Bastian JA, Flinn A, editors. Community archives, community spaces: heritage, memory and identity. London: : Facet Publishing 2020.
236
Welland S, Cossham A. Defining the undefinable: an analysis of definitions of community archives. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication 2019;68:617–34. doi:10.1108/GKMC-04-2019-0049
237
Flinn, A., Stevens, M. "It is noh mistri, wi mekin histri”. Telling Our Own Story: Independent and Community Archives in the United Kingdom, Challenging and Subverting the Mainstream. In: Community archives: the shaping of memory. London: : Facet 2009. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049047
238
Cole J, Nolan J, Seko Y, et al. GimpGirl grows up: Women with disabilities rethinking, redefining, and reclaiming community. New Media & Society 2011;13:1161–79. doi:10.1177/1461444811398032
239
EICHHORN K. D.I.Y. Collectors, Archiving Scholars, and Activist Librarians: Legitimizing Feminist Knowledge and Cultural Production Since 1990. Women’s Studies 2010;39:622–46. doi:10.1080/00497878.2010.490716
240
Lau AJ, Gilliland AJ, Anderson K. NATURALIZING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN INFORMATION STUDIES. Information, Communication & Society 2012;15:991–1015. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.630404
241
Flinn, A. The Impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. In: The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. London: : Facet 2011. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14509809360004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
242
Baker S, Huber A. Notes towards a typology of the DIY institution: Identifying do-it-yourself places of popular music preservation. European Journal of Cultural Studies 2013;16:513–30. doi:10.1177/1367549413491721
243
Caswell M, Mallick S. Collecting the easily missed stories: digital participatory microhistory and the South Asian American Digital Archive. Archives and Manuscripts 2014;42:73–86. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.880931
244
Flinn, A. Independent Community Archives and Community-Generated Content: ‘Writing, Saving and Sharing our Histories’. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 2010;16:39–51. doi:10.1177/1354856509347707
245
Stevens M, Flinn A, Shepherd E. New frameworks for community engagement in the archive sector: from handing over to handing on. International Journal of Heritage Studies 2010;16:59–76. doi:10.1080/13527250903441770
246
Gilliland A, Flinn A. Community Archives: What are we really talking about? In: Nexus, Confluence, and Difference: Community Archives meets Community Informatics: Prato CIRN Conference Oct 28-30 2013,. Centre for Community Networking Research, Centre for Social Informatics, Monash University http://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/920626/gilliland_flinn_keynote.pdf
247
Bastian, Jeannette Allis, Alexander, Ben. Community archives: the shaping of memory. London: : Facet 2009. doi:10.29085/9781856049047
248
Gray V. ‘Who’s that Knocking on Our Door?’: Archives, Outreach and Community. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2008;29:1–8. doi:10.1080/00379810802499652
249
Flinn A. Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges1. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2007;28:151–76. doi:10.1080/00379810701611936
250
MacNeil H, Eastwood T, editors. Currents of archival thinking. Second edition. Santa Barbara, California: : Libraries Unlimited 2017. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
251
Cifor, Marika C Michelle. ‘To Suddenly Discover Yourself Existing’: Uncovering the Impact of Community Archives. American Archivist 2016;79.http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0nd5g0p7
252
Caswell, ML. Seeing Yourself in History: Community Archives in the Fight Against Symbolic Annihilation. The Public Historian: a journal of public history Published Online First: 2016.http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9gc14537#page-1
253
Flinn A. Chapter 8: The impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. In: The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. London: : Facet 2011. 145–69.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f8a3983f-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
254
Ramírez M. The Task of the Latino/a Archivist: On Archiving Identity and Community. Studies [eScholarship]. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 5(1), Article 3 Published Online First: 2009.http://escholarship.org/uc/gseis_interactions?volume=5;issue=1
255
Hopkins I. Places From Which to Speak. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2008;29:83–109. doi:10.1080/00379810802515069
256
Cooper D. House proud: an ethnography of the BC Gay and Lesbian Archives. Archival Science Published Online First: 16 July 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9250-8
257
Bastian, Jeannette Allis, Alexander, Ben. Community archives: the shaping of memory. London: : Facet 2009. doi:10.29085/9781856049047
258
McKemmish S. Evidence of me . . . (first published in Archives and Manucscripts, 24 (1) 1996.).
259
Halilovich H. Reclaiming erased lives: archives, records and memories in post-war Bosnia and the Bosnian diaspora. Archival Science 2014;14:231–47. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9227-z
260
An argument for Archiving Facebook as a Heterogeneous Personal Store. http://www.csdl.tamu.edu/~marshall/DL14-marshall-and-shipman.pdf
261
Leighton John J. Digital lives - an initial synthesis Version 0.1. 2010.
262
Lost in Translation: Understanding the Possession of Digital Things in the Cloud. http://willodom.com/publications/paper1202-odom.pdf
263
paradigm | workbook on digital private papers.
264
Catherine Hobbs. The Character of Personal Archives: Reflections on the Value of Records of Individuals. Archivaria 2001;52.http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12817/14028
265
Protocols for Native American Archival Materials.
266
ATSILIRN - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Library and Information Resource Network.
267
Iacovino L. Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Archival Science 2010;10:353–72. doi:10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3
268
Krebs AB. Native America’s twenty-first-century right to know. Archival Science 2012;12:173–90. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9161-2
269
Riley T. Prospects in First Nations Archives: Reflections based on my participation in the Tribal Archives, Libraries and Museums Institutes and Conference programs. 2009.http://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/47975/1/Prospects%2520-%2520final.pdf
270
Thorpe K. Protocols for libraries and archives in Australia: incorporating Indigenous perspectives in the information field. 2013.http://library.ifla.org/99/
271
Roy L, Trace C, Gilbert S. Indigenous ways: assessing the awareness of and potential need for identifying content on indigenous world view in educating Libraries/Archives/Museum (LAM) entry level professionals. 2013.http://library.ifla.org/108/
272
Christen K. Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. The American Archivist 2011;74:185–210. doi:10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521
273
Gilliland AJ. Moving past: probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia. Archival Science 2014;14:249–74. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9231-3
274
Hawkins DT. Personal archiving: preserving our digital heritage. Medford, N.J.: : Information Today, Inc 2013.
275
Riva A. Pollard. The Appraisal of Personal Papers: A Critical Literature Review. Archivaria 2001;52.http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12818/14030
276
Jennifer Meehan. Rethinking Original Order and Personal Records. Archivaria 2010;70:27–44.http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13294
277
Creighton Barrett. Respect Which Fonds? Personal Archives and Family Businesses in Nova Scotia. Archivaria 2013;76:75–92.https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13459
278
Amelia Acker. Death, Memorialization, and Social Media: A Platform Perspective for Personal Archives. Archivaria 2014;77:1–23.https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13469
279
Anna Chen. Disorder: Vocabularies of Hoarding in Personal Digital Archiving Practices. Archivaria 2014;78:115–34.http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13507
280
Johnston R, Marwood K. Action heritage: research, communities, social justice. International Journal of Heritage Studies 2017;23:816–31. doi:10.1080/13527258.2017.1339111
281
Runnymede Trust. Finding Common Cause: building research collaborations between universities and Black and minority ethnic communities. https://www.runnymedetrust.org/uploads/publications/Runnymede%20Common%20Cause%20briefing%20FINAL.pdf
282
Shilton K, Srinivasan R. Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections. 2007.
283
Isto Huvila. The Unbearable Lightness of Participating? Revisiting the discourses of ’participation’ in archival literature. http://www.istohuvila.se/files/IstoHuvilaUnbearableLightnessPreprint.pdf
284
Huvila I. Participatory archive: towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualisation of records management. Archival Science 2008;8:15–36. doi:10.1007/s10502-008-9071-0
285
Rolan G. Agency in the archive: a model for participatory recordkeeping. Archival Science 2017;17:195–225. doi:10.1007/s10502-016-9267-7
286
Theimer K. What Is the Meaning of Archives 2.0? The American Archivist 2011;74:58–68. doi:10.17723/aarc.74.1.h7tn4m4027407666
287
Waterton E, Smith L. The recognition and misrecognition of community heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies 2010;16:4–15. doi:10.1080/13527250903441671
288
Anderson S, Allen R. Envisioning the Archival Commons. The American Archivist 2009;72:383–400. doi:10.17723/aarc.72.2.g54085061q586416
289
Flinn, A., Pick, G. Diversifying and deomcratising archive collections - an agenda for transformation. In: Embedding shared heritage: the Heritage Diversity Task Force report. London: : Greater London Authority 2009. http://www.mla.gov.uk/what/programmes/renaissance/regions/london/News_and_Resources/~/media/London/Files/2009/Publications/Embedding%20Shared%20Heritage_LOW%20resolution.ashx
290
Lang C, Stillman L, Linger H, et al. COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS IN THE COMMUNITY. Information, Communication & Society 2012;15:1081–105. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.704061
291
Battley B. Co-producing archival research with communication, reflexivity and friendship: crossing the three-wire bridge. Archival Science 2017;17:371–91. doi:10.1007/s10502-017-9279-y
292
Newman J. Revisiting Archive Collections: Developing Models for Participatory Cataloguing. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2012;33:57–73. doi:10.1080/00379816.2012.666404
293
Flinn A, Sexton A. Research on community heritage: moving from collaborative research to participatory and co-designed practice. https://studylib.net/doc/12864587/research-on-community-heritage--moving-from-collaborative
294
Bastian JA, Flinn A, editors. Community archives, community spaces: heritage, memory and identity. London: : Facet Publishing 2020.
295
No red lines: Industry defuses ethics guidelines for artificial intelligence – AlgorithmWatch. https://algorithmwatch.org/en/industry-defuses-ethics-guidelines-for-artificial-intelligence/
296
National Audit Office. Challenges in Using Data Across Government. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Challenges-in-using-data-across-government.pdf
297
Lemieux VL. Trusting records: is Blockchain technology the answer? Records Management Journal 2016;26:110–39. doi:10.1108/RMJ-12-2015-0042
298
Goudarouli E, Sexton A, Sheridan J. The Challenge of the Digital and the Future Archive: Through the Lens of The National Archives UK. Philosophy & Technology 2019;32:173–83. doi:10.1007/s13347-018-0333-3
299
Kirk D, Sellen A. On Human Remains: Values and Practice in the Home Archiving of Cherished Objects. Microsoft Researchhttps://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/on-human-remains-value-and-practice-in-the-home-archiving-of-cherished-objects/
300
Irons A. Computer forensics and records management – compatible disciplines. Records Management Journal 2006;16:102–12. doi:10.1108/09565690610677463
301
Rethinking the Web as a Personal Archive. Microsoft Researchhttps://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/rethinking-the-web-as-a-personal-archive/
302
The Institute of Conservation Professional Standards in Conservation. https://www.icon.org.uk/resources/resources-for-conservation-professionals/standards-and-ethics/icon-professional-standards.html
303
Michele V. Cloonan. The Boundaries of Preservation and Conservation Research. Libraries & the Cultural Record 2011;46:220–9.https://www.jstor.org/stable/23053599?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
304
Kim Y, Ross S. Closing the loop: Assisting archival appraisal and information retrieval in one sweep. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2013;50:1–10. doi:10.1002/meet.14505001042
305
Harvey R, Thompson D. Automating the appraisal of digital materials. Library Hi Tech 2010;28:313–22. doi:10.1108/07378831011047703
306
International Conference on the History of Records and Archives. Engaging with records and archives: histories and theories. London: : Facet Publishing 2016. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1424541&site=ehost-live&scope=site
307
Bunn J. Developing descriptive standards: a renewed call to action. Archives and Records 2013;34:235–47. doi:10.1080/23257962.2013.830066
308
Niu J. Organisation and description of datasets. Archives and Manuscripts 2016;44:73–85. doi:10.1080/01576895.2016.1179585
309
Gracy KF. Archival description and linked data: a preliminary study of opportunities and implementation challenges. Archival Science 2015;15:239–94. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9216-2
310
MacNeil H. What finding aids do: archival description as rhetorical genre in traditional and web-based environments. Archival Science 2012;12:485–500. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9175-4
311
Clough P, Tang J, Hall MM, et al. Linking archival data to location: a case study at the UK National Archives. Aslib Proceedings 2011;63:127–47. doi:10.1108/00012531111135628
312
Rolan G. Towards Archive 2.0: issues in archival systems interoperability. Archives and Manuscripts 2015;43:42–60. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.959535
313
When Archivists and Digital Asset Managers Collide: Tensions and Ways Forward | The American Archivist. http://americanarchivist.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.121
314
Eito-Brun R. Context-based aggregation of archival data: the role of authority records in the semantic landscape. Archival Science Published Online First: 2 February 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9215-3
315
Marty PF. An Introduction to Digital Convergence: Libraries, Archives, and Museums in the Information Age. The Library Quarterly 2010;80:1–5. doi:10.1086/648549
316
Niu J. Event-based archival information organization. Archival Science Published Online First: 13 June 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9222-4
317
Ray J. Sharks, digital curation, and the education of information professionals. Museum Management and Curatorship 2009;24:357–68. doi:10.1080/09647770903314720
318
Cunningham A. Digital Curation/Digital Archiving: A View from the National Archives of Australia. The American Archivist 2008;71:530–43. doi:10.17723/aarc.71.2.p0h0t68547385507
319
Higgins S. Digital Curation: The Emergence of a New Discipline. International Journal of Digital Curation 2011;6. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.191
320
Timms K. New Partnerships for Old Sibling Rivals: The Development of Integrated Access Systems for the Holdings of Archives, Libraries and Museums. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13230/14549
321
Lee C, Tibbo H. Where’s the Archivist in Digital Curation? Exploring the Possibities through a Matrix of Knowledge and Skills. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13362/14668
322
Cumming K, Findlay C. Digital recordkeeping: are we at a tipping point? Records Management Journal 2010;20:265–78. doi:10.1108/09565691011095292
323
Kalfatovic MR, Kapsalis E, Spiess KP, et al. Smithsonian Team Flickr: a library, archives, and museums collaboration in web 2.0 space. Archival Science 2008;8:267–77. doi:10.1007/s10502-009-9089-y
324
Museum Management and Curatorship - Volume 24, Issue 4. https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rmmc20/24/4
325
Marsden C. Sectors and Domains: Some reflections on co-operation and integration. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2001;22:17–23. doi:10.1080/00379810120037469
326
Robinson H. Remembering things differently: museums, libraries and archives as memory institutions and the implications for convergence. Museum Management and Curatorship 2012;27:413–29. doi:10.1080/09647775.2012.720188
327
Exploring Heritage in Participatory Culture: The MuseumApp | museumsandtheweb.com. http://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2011/papers/exploring_heritage_in_participatory_culture_th
328
Strauss A. Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science Published Online First: 3 September 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3
329
Gilliland AJ, Halilovich H. Migrating memories: transdisciplinary pedagogical approaches to teaching about diasporic memory, identity and human rights in archival studies. Archival Science 2017;17:79–96. doi:10.1007/s10502-016-9265-9
330
Ricardo P, Michelle C. Critical Directions for Archival Approaches to Social Justice. The Library Quarterlyhttp://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/684145
331
Matthews RJ. Is the archivist a "radical atheist” now? Deconstruction, its new wave, and archival activism. Archival Science Published Online First: 13 June 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9248-2
332
Butler B. ‘Othering’ the archive—from exile to inclusion and heritage dignity: the case of Palestinian archival memory. Archival Science 2009;9:57–69. doi:10.1007/s10502-009-9095-0
333
Susan Pell. Radicalizing the Politics of the Archive: An Ethnographic Reading of an Activist Archive. Archivaria 2015;80:33–57.http://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13543/14896
334
Flinn A, Alexander B. "Humanizing an inevitability political craft”: Introduction to the special issue on archiving activism and activist archiving. Archival Science 2015;15:329–35. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9260-6
335
Evans J, McKemmish S, Daniels E, et al. Self-determination and archival autonomy: advocating activism. Archival Science 2015;15:337–68. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9244-6
336
Jimerson, Randall C., Society of American Archivists. Archives power: memory, accountability, and social justice. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2009.
337
Wakimoto DK, Bruce C, Partridge H. Archivist as activist: lessons from three queer community archives in California. Archival Science 2013;13:293–316. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9201-1
338
Flinn A. Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions [eScholarship]. interActions UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies 2011;7.
339
Sellie A, Goldstein J, Fair M, et al. Interference Archive: a free space for social movement culture. Archival Science 2015;15:453–72. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9245-5
340
Gilliland, Anne J. The Role of Participatory Archives in Furthering Human Rights, Reconciliation and Recovery. Atlanti: Review for Modern Archival Theory and Practice,;24.http://escholarship.org/uc/item/346521tf
341
Yaco S, Hardy BB. Historians, archivists, and social activism: benefits and costs. Archival Science 2013;13:253–72. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9187-0
342
Buchanan A, Bastian M. Activating the archive: rethinking the role of traditional archives for local activist projects. Archival Science 2015;15:429–51. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9247-3
343
Wood S, Carbone K, Cifor M, et al. Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights. Archival Science 2014;14:397–419. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9233-1
344
Caswell M. Defining human rights archives: introduction to the special double issue on archives and human rights. Archival Science 2014;14:207–13. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9226-0
345
Schwartz JM, Cook T. Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science 2002;2:1–19. doi:10.1007/BF02435628
346
Harris V. The archival sliver: Power, memory, and archives in South Africa. Archival Science 2002;2:63–86. doi:10.1007/BF02435631
347
Sachs A. Archives, Truth, and Reconciliation. Archivaria 2006;62.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12887/14118
348
Hamilton, Carolyn. Refiguring the archive. Dordrecht: : Kluwer Academic 2002. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0570-8
349
Cumming K, Picot A. Reinventing appraisal. Archives and Manuscripts 2014;42:133–45. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.926824
350
Schellenberg TR. The Appraisal of Modern Records.
351
The National Archives Appraisal Policy Background Paper - The ‘Grigg System’ and Beyond.
352
Cook T. Macroappraisal in Theory and Practice: Origins, Characteristics, and Implementation in Canada, 1950–2000. Archival Science 2006;5:101–61. doi:10.1007/s10502-005-9010-2
353
Significance 2.0: a guide to assessing the significance of collections - significance-2.0.pdf. https://www.arts.gov.au/what-we-do/museums-libraries-and-galleries/significance-20
354
Booms H. Society and the Formation of a Documentary Heritage: Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources. 1987.
355
Abraham T. Collection Policy or Documentation Strategy: Theory and Practice. The American Archivist 1991;54:44–52. doi:10.17723/aarc.54.1.v2323483077xr227
356
Cox R. The Documentation Strategy and Archival Appraisal Principles: A Different Perspective.
357
Boles F, Young J. Exploring the Black Box: The Appraisal of University Administrative Records. The American Archivist 1985;48:121–40. doi:10.17723/aarc.48.2.1414g624328868vw
358
Bailey C. Past Imperfect? Reflections on the Evolution of Canadian Federal Government Records Appraisal. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13432/14742
359
Hohmann P. On Impartiality and Interrelatedness: Reactions to Jenkinsonian Appraisal in the Twentieth Century. The American Archivist 2016;79:14–25. doi:10.17723/0360-9081.79.1.14
360
Wisniewski Timothy. Framers of the Kept: Against the Grain Appraisal of Ephemeral Moving Images. The Moving Image 2008;7:1–24. doi:10.1353/mov.2008.0002
361
Cynthia K. Sauer. Doing the Best We Can? The Use of Collection Development Policies and Cooperative Collecting Activities at Manuscript Repositories. The American Archivist 2001;64:308–49.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/40294175?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Doing&searchText=the&searchText=best&searchText=we&searchText=can?&searchText=The&searchText=use&searchText=of&searchText=collection&searchText=development&searchText=policies&searchText=and&searchText=cooperative&searchText=collecting&searchText=activities&searchText=at&searchText=manuscript&searchText=repositories&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DDoing%2Bthe%2Bbest%2Bwe%2Bcan%253F%2BThe%2Buse%2Bof%2Bcollection%2Bdevelopment%2Bpolicies%2Band%2Bcooperative%2Bcollecting%2Bactivities%2Bat%2Bmanuscript%2Brepositories%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj50000557%26amp%3BSearch%3DSearch%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3BglobalSearch%3D%26amp%3BsbbBox%3D%26amp%3BsbjBox%3D%26amp%3BsbpBox%3D
362
Mancuso L. Archival appraisal in Brazil. Archives and Manuscripts 2013;41:146–59. doi:10.1080/01576895.2013.801101
363
Kretzschmar R. Archival Appraisal in Germany: A Decade of Theory, Strategies, and Practices. Archival Science 2006;5:219–38. doi:10.1007/s10502-005-9014-y
364
Taylor I. The German appraisal discussion since 1990: an overview. Archives and Manuscripts 2016;44:14–23. doi:10.1080/01576895.2015.1136226
365
Cook M. Appraisal and access: We should expect changes driven by the media and by public awareness. Records Management Journal 2010;20:72–7. doi:10.1108/09565691011039843
366
Eastwood T. Reflections on the Goal of Archival Appraisal in Demoncratic Societies.
367
FORTIER N. Transparency, Compliance, and Accountability: Developing a Knowledge Infrastructure for Macroappraisal at Library and Archives Canada. Archival Science 2005;5:343–60. doi:10.1007/s10502-005-9005-z
368
The National Geospatial Digital Archives—Collection Development: Lessons Learned. Library Trends 2009;57:490–515. doi:10.1353/lib.0.0049
369
Carvalho C. Appraisal based on organic functional analysis: a case study in an electronic records environment. Records Management Journal 2001;11:175–205. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007274
370
Sims F. A new appraisal approach for English Heritage. Records Management Journal 2002;12:8–13. doi:10.1108/09565690210427743
371
Tschan R. A Comparison of Jenkinson and Schellenberg on Appraisal. The American Archivist 2002;65:176–95. doi:10.17723/aarc.65.2.920w65g3217706l1
372
Cox, Richard J. No innocent deposits: forming archives by rethinking appraisal. Lanham, Md: : Scarecrow Press 2004.
373
Arias PB. Appraising the value of statistical records of the European Central Bank for retention scheduling purposes. Records Management Journal 2008;18:205–20. doi:10.1108/09565690810916456
374
Jonker AEM. No Privileged Past—Acquisition Revisited. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2009;30:67–80. doi:10.1080/00379810903264625
375
Cook, Terry, Samuels, Helen Willa. Controlling the past: documenting society and institutions : essays in honor of Helen Willa Samuels. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2011.
376
Boles, Frank. Selecting & appraising archives & manuscripts. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2005.
377
Samuels H. Improving our disposition: documentation strategy. Archivaria 1991;33.
378
Craig, Barbara Lazenby. Archival appraisal: theory and practice. München: : K.G. Saur 2004.
379
SCOTT M. Functional appraisal of records: a methodology. Records Management Journal 1997;7:101–14. doi:10.1108/eb027107
380
Cox R, Samuels H. The Archivist’s First Responsibility: A Research Agenda to Improve the Identification and Retention of Records of Enduring Value. The American Archivist 1988;51:28–42. doi:10.17723/aarc.51.1-2.gkw67424l3344ug8
381
Alexander P, Samuels H. The Roots of 128: A Hypothetical Documentation Strategy. The American Archivist 1987;50:518–31. doi:10.17723/aarc.50.4.v889q1182r11p36u
382
Honer E, Graham S. Should Users Have a Role in Determining the Future Archive? The Approach Adopted by the Public Record Office, the UK National Archive, to the Selection of Records for Permanent Preservation | Honer | LIBER Quarterly.
383
MacNeil H, Eastwood T, editors. Currents of archival thinking. Second edition. Santa Barbara, California: : Libraries Unlimited 2017. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4776509
