1.
Goodin RE, Pettit P, Pogge T, eds. A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Wiley; 2017. doi:10.1002/9781405177245
2.
Wolff J. An Introduction to Political Philosophy. Rev. ed. Oxford University Press; 2006.
3.
Simmons AJ. Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton University Press; 1979.
4.
Horton J. Political Obligation. Vol Issues in political theory. Macmillan; 1992.
5.
Richard B. Friedman. On the Concept of Authority in Political Philosophy. In: Political Obligation. Vol Issues in political theory. Macmillan; 1992.
6.
Robert P. Wolff. The Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy’. In: In Defense of Anarchism. Vol Harper essays in philosophy. Harper & Row; 1976.
7.
Harry G. Frankfurt. The Anarchism of Robert Paul Wolff. Political Theory. 1973;1(4):405-414. http://www.jstor.org/stable/191060
8.
Green L. The Authority of the State. Clarendon; 1988.
9.
Richard Tuck. Why is Authority Such a Problem? In: Philosophy, Politics and Society: 4th Series. Blackwell; 1972.
10.
Jo Wolff. Anarchism and Skepticism. In: For and against the State: New Philosophical Readings. Vol Studies in social, political, and legal philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield; 1996.
11.
John Simmons. Philosophical Anarchism. In: For and against the State: New Philosophical Readings. Vol Studies in social, political, and legal philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield; 1996.
12.
A. John Simmons. Justification and Legitimacy*. Ethics. 1999;109(4):739-771. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/233944
13.
Richard Dworkin. The Puzzle of Legitimacy’. In: Law’s Empire. Hart; 1998.
14.
Ripstein A. Authority and Coercion. Philosophy  Public Affairs. 2004;32(1):2-35. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00003.x
15.
Horton J. Political Obligation. Vol Issues in political theory. Macmillan; 1992.
16.
Simmons AJ. Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton University Press; 1979.
17.
Miller D. Anarchism. Vol Modern ideologies. Dent; 1984.
18.
Pitkin H. Obligation and Consent--I. The American Political Science Review. 1965;59(4). doi:10.2307/1953218
19.
Hanna Pitkin. Obligation and Consent--II. The American Political Science Review. 1966;60(1):39-52. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1953805?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
20.
Joseph Raz. Authority and Justification. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1985;14(1):3-29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265235
21.
Patrick Durning. Joseph Raz and the Instrumental Justification of a Duty to Obey the Law. Law and Philosophy. 2003;22(6):597-620. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3505046
22.
Locke J, Locke J, Gough JW. The Second Treatise of Civil Government: And, A Letter Concerning Toleration. Basil Blackwell; 1948.
23.
Hume D, MacIntyre AC. Hume’s Ethical Writings: Selections from David Hume. University of Notre Dame Press; 1979.
24.
A. John Simmons. Tacit Consent and Political Obligation. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1976;5(3):274-291. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2264884?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
25.
Simmons AJ. Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton University Press; 1979.
26.
John Horton. Chapters 2,3,4,. In: Political Obligation. Vol Issues in political theory. Macmillan; 1992.
27.
Beran H. The Consent Theory of Political Obligation. Vol Croom Helm international series in social and political thought. Croom Helm
28.
Ronald Dworkin. The Original Position. The University of Chicago Law Review. 1973;40(3):500-533. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1599246?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
29.
Margaret Gilbert. Reconsidering the ‘Actual Contract’ and Theory of Political Obligation*. Ethics. 1999;109(2):236-260. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/233895
30.
Darwall S. Authority, Accountability, and Preemption. Jurisprudence. 2011;2(1):103-119. doi:10.5235/204033211796290263
31.
Daniel Star, Candice Delmas. Three Conceptions of Practical Authority. Jurisprudence. 21(2):143-160. doi:10.5235/204033211796290272
32.
May T. On Raz and the Obligation to Obey the Law. Law and Philosophy. 16(1):19-36. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3504817?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
33.
Pateman C. The Problem of Political Obligation: A Critique of Liberal Theory. Polity in association with Blackwell; 1985.
34.
Hanna Pitkin. Obligation and Consent--II. The American Political Science Review. 1966;60(1):39-52. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1953805?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
35.
A. John Simmons. Tacit Consent and Political Obligation. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1976;5(3):274-291. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2264884?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
36.
John Horton. Chapters 2,3,4,. In: Political Obligation. Vol Issues in political theory. Macmillan; 1992.
37.
George Klosko. Presumptive Benefit, Fairness, and Political Obligation. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1987;16(3):241-259. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265266
38.
Horton J. In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part One. Political Studies. 2006;54(3):427-443. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00621.x
39.
Horton J. In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part Two. Political Studies. 2007;55(1):1-19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00642.x
40.
Dagger R. Membership, Fair Play, and Political Obligation. Political Studies. 2000;48(1):104-117. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00253
41.
George Klosko. Multiple Principles of Political Obligation. Political Theory. 2004;32(6):801-824. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4148146
42.
A. John Simmons. Fair Play and Political Obligation: Twenty Years Later. In: Justification and Legitimacy. Cambridge University Press; 2000. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511625152
43.
A. John Simmons. Associative Political Obligations. Ethics. 1996;106(2):247-273. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382059
44.
Klosko G. The Principle of Fairness and Political Obligation. Vol Studies in social, political, and legal philosophy. New ed. Rowman & Littlefield; 2004.
45.
Richard J. Arneson. The Principle of Fairness and Free-Rider Problems. Ethics. 1982;92(4):616-633. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2380394
46.
John Rawls. Legal Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play. In: Collected Papers. Harvard University Press; 1999.
47.
Dworkin R. Law’s Empire. Vol Fontana master guides. Fontana; 1986.
48.
McDermott D. Fair-Play Obligations. Political Studies. 2004;52(2):216-232. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00476.x
49.
Nozick R. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Blackwell; 1974.
50.
Tamir Y. Liberal Nationalism. Vol Studies in moral, political, and legal philosophy. Princeton University Press; 1993.
51.
Andrew Mason. Special Obligations to Compatriots. Ethics. 1997;107(3):427-447. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382324
52.
Christopher Heath Wellman. Associative Allegiances and Political Obligations. Social Theory and Practice. 1997;23(2):181-204. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23559181
53.
Jo Wolff. Political Obligation: A Pluralistic Approach. In: Pluralism: The Philosophy and Politics of Diversity. Routledge; 2000.
54.
Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Rev. ed. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1999.
55.
Brownlee K. Features of a Paradigm Case of Civil Disobedience. Res Publica. 2004;10(4):337-351. doi:10.1007/s11158-004-2326-6
56.
Dworkin R. Civil disobedience and nuclear protest. In: A Matter of Principle. Clarendon Press; 1986.
57.
Ronald Dworkin. Civil Disobedience. In: Taking Rights Seriously. Duckworth; 1977.
58.
Brownlee K. Conscience and Conviction. Oxford University Press; 2012. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592944.001.0001
59.
LYONS D. Moral Judgment, Historical Reality, and Civil Disobedience. Philosophy  Public Affairs. 1998;27(1):31-49. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00058.x
60.
Haksar V. Rawls and Gandhi on civil disobedience. Inquiry. 1976;19(1-4):151-192. doi:10.1080/00201747608601790
61.
Smith W. Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience. Res Publica. 2004;10(4):353-377. doi:10.1007/s11158-004-2327-5
62.
JOHN  MORREALL. The Justifiability of Violent Civil Disobedience. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 2013;6(1):35-47. http://www-tandfonline-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/00455091.1976.10716975
63.
Martin L. King. Letter from Birmingham Jail. https://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
64.
Simmons AJ. Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton University Press; 1979.
65.
Markovitz D. ‘Democratic Disobedience’. Yale Law Journal. 2005;114. https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/418/
66.
David Lefkowitz. On a Moral Right to Civil Disobedience*. Ethics. 2007;117(2):202-233. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/510694
67.
Singer P. Democracy and Disobedience. Clarendon Press; 1973.
68.
Adam J, Plato. Platonis Crito. Vol Pitt press series. University press; 1903.
69.
Raz J. The Authority of lawEssays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press; 1979. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.001.0001
70.
Walzer M. Obligations: Essays on Disobedience, War, and Citizenship. Harvard University Press; 1970.
71.
Sabl A. Looking Forward to Justice: Rawlsian Civil Disobedience and its Non-Rawlsian Lessons. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2001;9(3):331-349. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00129
72.
David Enoch. Some Arguments against Conscientious Objection and Civil Disobedience Refuted. Israel Law Review. 2002;36:227-253. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/israel36&id=629&collection=journals&index=journals/israel
73.
BUCHANAN A. Theories of Secession. Philosophy  Public Affairs. 1997;26(1):31-61. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00049.x
74.
Alan Patten. Democratic Secession from a Multinational State*. Ethics. 2002;112(3):558-586. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/338778
75.
Daniel Philpott. In Defense of Self-Determination. Ethics. 1995;105(2):352-385. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382349
76.
Moore M, ed. National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford University Press; 1998. doi:10.1093/0198293844.001.0001
77.
David Miller. Secession and the Principle of Nationality. In: Moore M, ed. National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford University Press; 1998. doi:10.1093/0198293844.001.0001
78.
Moore M, ed. National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford University Press; 1998. doi:10.1093/0198293844.001.0001
79.
Margaret Moore. The Ethics of Secession and a Normative Theory of Nationalism. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. 13(2):225-250. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/caljp13&id=227&collection=journals&index=journals/caljp
80.
David Gauthier. Breaking up: An Essay on Secession. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 1994;24(3):357-371. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40231872
81.
Brilmayer, Lea. Secession and Self-Determination: A Territorial Interpretation. Yale Journal of International Law. 1991;16(1):177-202. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjil16&id=183&collection=journals&index=journals/yjil
82.
Christopher H. Wellman. A Defense of Secession and Political Self-Determination. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1995;24(2):142-171. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265391
83.
Wellman CH. A Theory of Secession: The Case for Political Self-Determination. Cambridge University Press; 2005. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/theory-of-secession/79CF1B218C8B49C0EBC9E1493DB75ED7
84.
Buchanan AE. Secession: The Morality of Political Divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec. Westview Press; 1991.
85.
Buchanan A. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination. Oxford University Press; 2003. doi:10.1093/0198295359.001.0001
86.
Macedo S, Buchanan AE. Secession and Self-Determination. Vol Nomos. New York University Press; 2003.
87.
W. B. Gallie. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 1956;56:167-198. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/4544562?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
88.
LIST C. The Logical Space of Democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2011;39(3):262-297. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01206.x
89.
Gutmann A. Democracy. In: Goodin RE, Pettit P, Pogge T, eds. A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Wiley; 2017. doi:10.1002/9781405177245
90.
Sen AK. Democracy as a Universal Value. Journal of Democracy. 1999;10(3):3-17. doi:10.1353/jod.1999.0055
91.
Weale A. Democracy. Vol Issues in political theory. Palgrave; 1999.
92.
Estlund DM. Democracy. Vol Blackwell readings in philosophy. Blackwell Publishers; 2001.
93.
Democracy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/democracy/
94.
Brian Barry. Is Democracy Special? In: Democracy and Power: Essays in Political Theory I. Clarendon Press; 1991.
95.
Schumpeter JA. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. G. Allen & Unwin Ltd; 1943.
96.
Quinton A. Political Philosophy. Vol Oxford readings in philosophy. Oxford University Press; 1967.
97.
Dahl RA. Democracy and Its Critics. Yale University Press; 1989. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=52831&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
98.
Dworkin R. Justice for Hedgehogs. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2011. https://search-ebscohost-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=364811&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
99.
Christiano T. The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory. Vol Focus (Southern Regional Education Board). Westview Press; 1996.
100.
Gordon Graham. What is Special About Democracy? Mind. 1983;92(365):94-102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2253932
101.
Dahl RA. Democracy and Its Critics. Yale University Press; 1989. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=52831&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
102.
Richard Arneson. Democracy is not Intrinsically Just. In: Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge University Press; 2004.
103.
Parijs P. Justice and Democracy: Are they Incompatible?*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 1996;4(2):101-117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.1996.tb00044.x
104.
Griffin CG. Democracy as a Non-Instrumentally Just Procedure. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2003;11(1):111-121. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00169
105.
Arneson RJ. Defending the Purely Instrumental Account of Democratic Legitimacy. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2003;11(1):122-132. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00170
106.
Christiano T. The Authority of Democracy*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2004;12(3):266-290. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00200.x
107.
Joshua Cohen. Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In: The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State. Basil Blackwell; 1989.
108.
Review by: Joshua Cohen. Reflections on Rousseau: Autonomy and Democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1986;15(3):275-297. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265213
109.
Valentini L. Justice, Disagreement and Democracy. British Journal of Political Science. 2013;43(01):177-199. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000294
110.
Ross M. Is Democracy Good for the Poor? American Journal of Political Science. 2006;50(4):860-874. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00220.x
111.
Estlund DM. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton University Press; 2008. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781400831548
112.
Walzer M. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. Basic Books; 1983.
113.
Young IM. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press; 2002. doi:10.1093/0198297556.001.0001
114.
Beitz CR. Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory. Princeton University Press; 1989.
115.
Jeremy Waldron. The Wisdom of the Multitude: Some Reflections on Book 3, Chapter 11 of Aristotle’s Politics. Political Theory. 1995;23(4):563-584. http://www.jstor.org/stable/191901
116.
Jeremy Waldron. The Core of the Case against Judicial Review. The Yale Law Journal. 2006;115(6):1346-1406. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/20455656?origin=crossref
117.
Brettschneider C. Balancing Procedures and Outcomes Within Democratic Theory: Core Values and Judicial Review. Political Studies. 2005;53(2):423-441. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00536.x
118.
Allen Buchanan. Political Legitimacy and Democracy*. Ethics. 2002;112(4):689-719. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/340313
119.
Anne Phillips. Democracy and Difference: Some Problems for Feminist Theory. In: The Rights of Minority Cultures. Oxford University Press; 1997.
120.
Risse M. Arguing for Majority Rule*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2004;12(1):41-64. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00190.x
121.
Christiano T. The Constitution of Equality. Oxford University Press; 2008. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198297475.001.0001
122.
Democracy, Political Equality, and Majority Rule*. Ethics. 2010;121(1):148-177. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/656474
123.
Harrison R. Democracy. Routledge; 2002. doi:10.4324/9780203005545
124.
Weale A. Democracy. Vol Issues in political theory. Palgrave; 1999.
125.
Steven Macedo. Against Majoritarianism: Democratic Values and Institutional Design. Boston University Law Review. 90(2):1029-1042. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=1029&handle=hein.journals%2Fbulr90&collection=journals
126.
Waldron J. Law and Disagreement. Oxford University Press; 1999. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001
127.
Noveck, Scott M. Is Judicial Review Compatible with Democracy? Cardozo Public Law, Policy, and Ethics Journal. 2007;6(2):401-430. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/cardplp6&id=407&collection=journals&index=journals/cardplp
128.
Dworkin R. Law’s Empire. Vol Fontana master guides. Fontana; 1986.
129.
Christiano T. The Authority of Democracy*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2004;12(3):266-290. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00200.x
130.
LIST C, KOENIG-ARCHIBUGI M. Can There Be a Global Demos? An Agency-Based Approach. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2010;38(1):76-110. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01174.x
131.
Miller D. Democracy’s Domain. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2009;37(3):201-228. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01158.x
132.
Goodin RE. Global democracy: in the beginning. International Theory. 2010;2(02):175-209. doi:10.1017/S1752971910000060
133.
Koenig-Archibugi M. Is global democracy possible? European Journal of International Relations. 2011;17(3):519-542. doi:10.1177/1354066110366056
134.
David Miller. Against Global Democracy. In: After the Nation?: Critical Reflections on Nationalism and Post-Nationalism. Vol International political theory series. Palgrave Macmillan; 2010.
135.
Näsström S. The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle. Political Studies. 2011;59(1):116-134. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00845.x
136.
GOODIN RE. Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2007;35(1):40-68. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00098.x
137.
Macdonald T. Global Stakeholder Democracy. Oxford University Press; 2008. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199235001.001.0001
138.
Thompson DF. Democratic Theory and Global Society. Journal of Political Philosophy. 1999;7(2):111-125. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00069
139.
Gould CC. Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights. Cambridge University Press; 2004. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511617096
140.
David Held. Democracy and the International System. In: Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order. Polity Press; 1995.
141.
Robert Dahl. Can International Organisations be Democratic? In: Democracy’s Edges. Vol Contemporary political theory. Cambridge University Press; 1999.
142.
Cabrera, Luis. The Inconveniences of Transnational Democracy. Ethics and International Affairs. 1AD;21(2):219-238. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ethics-and-international-affairs/article/inconveniences-of-transnational-democracy/96027C6EE6E68D572DE43E93F9E2C8A8
143.
Ronald Dworkin. The Original Position. The University of Chicago Law Review. 1973;40(3):500-533. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1599246?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
144.
Daniel Star, Candice Delmas. Three Conceptions of Practical Authority. Jurisprudence. 21(2):143-160. doi:10.5235/204033211796290272
145.
May T. On Raz and the Obligation to Obey the Law. Law and Philosophy. 16(1):19-36. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3504817?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
146.
Dagger R. Membership, Fair Play, and Political Obligation. Political Studies. 2000;48(1):104-117. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00253
147.
A. John Simmons. Fair Play and Political Obligation: Twenty Years Later. In: Justification and Legitimacy. Cambridge University Press; 2000. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511625152
148.
Dworkin R. Civil disobedience and nuclear protest. In: A Matter of Principle. Clarendon Press; 1986.
149.
Smith W. Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience. Res Publica. 2004;10(4):353-377. doi:10.1007/s11158-004-2327-5
150.
JOHN  MORREALL. The Justifiability of Violent Civil Disobedience. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 2013;6(1):35-47. http://www-tandfonline-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/00455091.1976.10716975
151.
Martin L. King. Letter from Birmingham Jail. https://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
152.
Markovitz D. ‘Democratic Disobedience’. Yale Law Journal. 2005;114. https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/418/
153.
W. B. Gallie. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 1956;56:167-198. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/4544562?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents