1
Goodin RE, Pettit P, Pogge T, editors. A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Wiley 2017. doi:10.1002/9781405177245
2
Wolff J. An introduction to political philosophy. Rev. ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006.
3
Simmons AJ. Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1979.
4
Horton J. Political obligation. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1992.
5
Richard B. Friedman. On the Concept of Authority in Political Philosophy. In: Political obligation. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1992.
6
Robert P. Wolff. The Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy’. In: In defense of anarchism. New York: : Harper & Row 1976.
7
Harry G. Frankfurt. The Anarchism of Robert Paul Wolff. Political Theory 1973;1:405–14.http://www.jstor.org/stable/191060
8
Green L. The authority of the state. Oxford: : Clarendon 1988.
9
Richard Tuck. Why is Authority Such a Problem? In: Philosophy, politics and society: 4th series. Oxford: : Blackwell 1972.
10
Jo Wolff. Anarchism and Skepticism. In: For and against the state: new philosophical readings. Lanham, Md: : Rowman & Littlefield 1996.
11
John Simmons. Philosophical Anarchism. In: For and against the state: new philosophical readings. Lanham, Md: : Rowman & Littlefield 1996.
12
A. John Simmons. Justification and Legitimacy*. Ethics 1999;109:739–71.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/233944
13
Richard Dworkin. The Puzzle of Legitimacy’. In: Law’s empire. Oxford: : Hart 1998.
14
Ripstein A. Authority and Coercion. Philosophy Public Affairs 2004;32:2–35. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00003.x
15
Horton J. Political obligation. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1992.
16
Simmons AJ. Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1979.
17
Miller D. Anarchism. London: : Dent 1984.
18
Pitkin H. Obligation and Consent--I. The American Political Science Review 1965;59. doi:10.2307/1953218
19
Hanna Pitkin. Obligation and Consent--II. The American Political Science Review 1966;60:39–52.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1953805?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
20
Joseph Raz. Authority and Justification. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1985;14:3–29.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265235
21
Patrick Durning. Joseph Raz and the Instrumental Justification of a Duty to Obey the Law. Law and Philosophy 2003;22:597–620.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3505046
22
Locke J, Locke J, Gough JW. The second treatise of civil government: and, A letter concerning toleration. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1948.
23
Hume D, MacIntyre AC. Hume’s ethical writings: selections from David Hume. Notre Dame, Ind: : University of Notre Dame Press 1979.
24
A. John Simmons. Tacit Consent and Political Obligation. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1976;5:274–91.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2264884?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
25
Simmons AJ. Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1979.
26
John Horton. Chapters 2,3,4,. In: Political obligation. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1992.
27
Beran H. The consent theory of political obligation. London: : Croom Helm
28
Ronald Dworkin. The Original Position. The University of Chicago Law Review 1973;40:500–33.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1599246?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
29
Margaret Gilbert. Reconsidering the ‘Actual Contract’ and Theory of Political Obligation*. Ethics 1999;109:236–60.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/233895
30
Darwall S. Authority, Accountability, and Preemption. Jurisprudence 2011;2:103–19. doi:10.5235/204033211796290263
31
Daniel Star, Candice Delmas. Three Conceptions of Practical Authority. Jurisprudence;21:143–60. doi:10.5235/204033211796290272
32
May T. On Raz and the Obligation to Obey the Law. Law and Philosophy;16:19–36.https://www.jstor.org/stable/3504817?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
33
Pateman C. The problem of political obligation: a critique of liberal theory. Cambridge: : Polity in association with Blackwell 1985.
34
Hanna Pitkin. Obligation and Consent--II. The American Political Science Review 1966;60:39–52.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1953805?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
35
A. John Simmons. Tacit Consent and Political Obligation. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1976;5:274–91.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2264884?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
36
John Horton. Chapters 2,3,4,. In: Political obligation. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1992.
37
George Klosko. Presumptive Benefit, Fairness, and Political Obligation. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1987;16:241–59.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265266
38
Horton J. In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part One. Political Studies 2006;54:427–43. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00621.x
39
Horton J. In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part Two. Political Studies 2007;55:1–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00642.x
40
Dagger R. Membership, Fair Play, and Political Obligation. Political Studies 2000;48:104–17. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00253
41
George Klosko. Multiple Principles of Political Obligation. Political Theory 2004;32:801–24.http://www.jstor.org/stable/4148146
42
A. John Simmons. Fair Play and Political Obligation: Twenty Years Later. In: Justification and Legitimacy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511625152
43
A. John Simmons. Associative Political Obligations. Ethics 1996;106:247–73.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382059
44
Klosko G. The principle of fairness and political obligation. New ed. Lanham, Md: : Rowman & Littlefield 2004.
45
Richard J. Arneson. The Principle of Fairness and Free-Rider Problems. Ethics 1982;92:616–33.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2380394
46
John Rawls. Legal Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play. In: Collected papers. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1999.
47
Dworkin R. Law’s empire. London: : Fontana 1986.
48
McDermott D. Fair-Play Obligations. Political Studies 2004;52:216–32. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00476.x
49
Nozick R. Anarchy, state, and utopia. Oxford: : Blackwell 1974.
50
Tamir Y. Liberal nationalism. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1993.
51
Andrew Mason. Special Obligations to Compatriots. Ethics 1997;107:427–47.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382324
52
Christopher Heath Wellman. Associative Allegiances and Political Obligations. Social Theory and Practice 1997;23:181–204.http://www.jstor.org/stable/23559181
53
Jo Wolff. Political Obligation: A Pluralistic Approach. In: Pluralism: the philosophy and politics of diversity. London: : Routledge 2000.
54
Rawls J. A theory of justice. Rev. ed. Cambridge, Mass: : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1999.
55
Brownlee K. Features of a Paradigm Case of Civil Disobedience. Res Publica 2004;10:337–51. doi:10.1007/s11158-004-2326-6
56
Dworkin R. Civil disobedience and nuclear protest. In: A matter of principle. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1986.
57
Ronald Dworkin. Civil Disobedience. In: Taking rights seriously. London: : Duckworth 1977.
58
Brownlee K. Conscience and Conviction. Oxford University Press 2012. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592944.001.0001
59
LYONS D. Moral Judgment, Historical Reality, and Civil Disobedience. Philosophy Public Affairs 1998;27:31–49. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00058.x
60
Haksar V. Rawls and Gandhi on civil disobedience. Inquiry 1976;19:151–92. doi:10.1080/00201747608601790
61
Smith W. Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience. Res Publica 2004;10:353–77. doi:10.1007/s11158-004-2327-5
62
JOHN MORREALL. The Justifiability of Violent Civil Disobedience. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2013;6:35–47.http://www-tandfonline-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/00455091.1976.10716975
63
Martin L. King. Letter from Birmingham Jail. https://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
64
Simmons AJ. Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1979.
65
Markovitz D. ‘Democratic Disobedience’. Yale Law Journal 2005;114.https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/418/
66
David Lefkowitz. On a Moral Right to Civil Disobedience*. Ethics 2007;117:202–33.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/510694
67
Singer P. Democracy and disobedience. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1973.
68
Adam J, Plato. Platonis Crito. Cambridge: : University press 1903.
69
Raz J. The authority of lawEssays on law and morality. Oxford University Press 1979. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.001.0001
70
Walzer M. Obligations: essays on disobedience, war, and citizenship. Cambridge (Mass.): : Harvard University Press 1970.
71
Sabl A. Looking Forward to Justice: Rawlsian Civil Disobedience and its Non-Rawlsian Lessons. Journal of Political Philosophy 2001;9:331–49. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00129
72
David Enoch. Some Arguments against Conscientious Objection and Civil Disobedience Refuted. Israel Law Review 2002;36:227–53.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/israel36&id=629&collection=journals&index=journals/israel
73
BUCHANAN A. Theories of Secession. Philosophy Public Affairs 1997;26:31–61. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00049.x
74
Alan Patten. Democratic Secession from a Multinational State*. Ethics 2002;112:558–86.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/338778
75
Daniel Philpott. In Defense of Self-Determination. Ethics 1995;105:352–85.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382349
76
Moore M, editor. National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford University Press 1998. doi:10.1093/0198293844.001.0001
77
David Miller. Secession and the Principle of Nationality. In: Moore M, ed. National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford University Press 1998. doi:10.1093/0198293844.001.0001
78
Moore M, editor. National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford University Press 1998. doi:10.1093/0198293844.001.0001
79
Margaret Moore. The Ethics of Secession and a Normative Theory of Nationalism. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence;13:225–50.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/caljp13&id=227&collection=journals&index=journals/caljp
80
David Gauthier. Breaking up: An Essay on Secession. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1994;24:357–71.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40231872
81
Brilmayer, Lea. Secession and Self-Determination: A Territorial Interpretation. Yale Journal of International Law 1991;16:177–202.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjil16&id=183&collection=journals&index=journals/yjil
82
Christopher H. Wellman. A Defense of Secession and Political Self-Determination. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1995;24:142–71.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265391
83
Wellman CH. A theory of secession: the case for political self-determination. New York: : Cambridge University Press 2005. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/theory-of-secession/79CF1B218C8B49C0EBC9E1493DB75ED7
84
Buchanan AE. Secession: the morality of political divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec. Boulder: : Westview Press 1991.
85
Buchanan A. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination. Oxford University Press 2003. doi:10.1093/0198295359.001.0001
86
Macedo S, Buchanan AE. Secession and self-determination. New York, London: : New York University Press 2003.
87
W. B. Gallie. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1956;56:167–98.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/4544562?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
88
LIST C. The Logical Space of Democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs 2011;39:262–97. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01206.x
89
Gutmann A. Democracy. In: Goodin RE, Pettit P, Pogge T, eds. A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Wiley 2017. doi:10.1002/9781405177245
90
Sen AK. Democracy as a Universal Value. Journal of Democracy 1999;10:3–17. doi:10.1353/jod.1999.0055
91
Weale A. Democracy. Basingstoke: : Palgrave 1999.
92
Estlund DM. Democracy. Malden, MA: : Blackwell Publishers 2001.
93
Democracy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/democracy/
94
Brian Barry. Is Democracy Special? In: Democracy and power: essays in political theory I. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1991.
95
Schumpeter JA. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London: : G. Allen & Unwin Ltd 1943.
96
Quinton A. Political philosophy. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1967.
97
Dahl RA. Democracy and its critics. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1989. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=52831&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
98
Dworkin R. Justice for hedgehogs. Cambridge, Mass: : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2011. https://search-ebscohost-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=364811&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
99
Christiano T. The rule of the many: fundamental issues in democratic theory. Boulder, Colo: : Westview Press 1996.
100
Gordon Graham. What is Special About Democracy? Mind 1983;92:94–102.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2253932
101
Dahl RA. Democracy and its critics. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1989. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=52831&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
102
Richard Arneson. Democracy is not Intrinsically Just. In: Justice and democracy: essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004.
103
Parijs P. Justice and Democracy: Are they Incompatible?*. Journal of Political Philosophy 1996;4:101–17. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.1996.tb00044.x
104
Griffin CG. Democracy as a Non-Instrumentally Just Procedure. Journal of Political Philosophy 2003;11:111–21. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00169
105
Arneson RJ. Defending the Purely Instrumental Account of Democratic Legitimacy. Journal of Political Philosophy 2003;11:122–32. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00170
106
Christiano T. The Authority of Democracy*. Journal of Political Philosophy 2004;12:266–90. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00200.x
107
Joshua Cohen. Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In: The Good polity: normative analysis of the state. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1989.
108
Review by: Joshua Cohen. Reflections on Rousseau: Autonomy and Democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1986;15:275–97.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265213
109
Valentini L. Justice, Disagreement and Democracy. British Journal of Political Science 2013;43:177–99. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000294
110
Ross M. Is Democracy Good for the Poor? American Journal of Political Science 2006;50:860–74. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00220.x
111
Estlund DM. Democratic authority: a philosophical framework. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2008. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781400831548
112
Walzer M. Spheres of justice: a defense of pluralism and equality. New York: : Basic Books 1983.
113
Young IM. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press 2002. doi:10.1093/0198297556.001.0001
114
Beitz CR. Political equality: an essay in democratic theory. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1989.
115
Jeremy Waldron. The Wisdom of the Multitude: Some Reflections on Book 3, Chapter 11 of Aristotle’s Politics. Political Theory 1995;23:563–84.http://www.jstor.org/stable/191901
116
Jeremy Waldron. The Core of the Case against Judicial Review. The Yale Law Journal 2006;115:1346–406.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/20455656?origin=crossref
117
Brettschneider C. Balancing Procedures and Outcomes Within Democratic Theory: Core Values and Judicial Review. Political Studies 2005;53:423–41. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00536.x
118
Allen Buchanan. Political Legitimacy and Democracy*. Ethics 2002;112:689–719.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/340313
119
Anne Phillips. Democracy and Difference: Some Problems for Feminist Theory. In: The rights of minority cultures. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1997.
120
Risse M. Arguing for Majority Rule*. Journal of Political Philosophy 2004;12:41–64. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00190.x
121
Christiano T. The Constitution of Equality. Oxford University Press 2008. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198297475.001.0001
122
Democracy, Political Equality, and Majority Rule*. Ethics 2010;121:148–77.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/656474
123
Harrison R. Democracy. Routledge 2002. doi:10.4324/9780203005545
124
Weale A. Democracy. Basingstoke: : Palgrave 1999.
125
Steven Macedo. Against Majoritarianism: Democratic Values and Institutional Design. Boston University Law Review;90:1029–42.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=1029&handle=hein.journals%2Fbulr90&collection=journals
126
Waldron J. Law and Disagreement. Oxford University Press 1999. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001
127
Noveck, Scott M. Is Judicial Review Compatible with Democracy? Cardozo Public Law, Policy, and Ethics Journal 2007;6:401–30.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/cardplp6&id=407&collection=journals&index=journals/cardplp
128
Dworkin R. Law’s empire. London: : Fontana 1986.
129
Christiano T. The Authority of Democracy*. Journal of Political Philosophy 2004;12:266–90. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00200.x
130
LIST C, KOENIG-ARCHIBUGI M. Can There Be a Global Demos? An Agency-Based Approach. Philosophy & Public Affairs 2010;38:76–110. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01174.x
131
Miller D. Democracy’s Domain. Philosophy & Public Affairs 2009;37:201–28. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01158.x
132
Goodin RE. Global democracy: in the beginning. International Theory 2010;2:175–209. doi:10.1017/S1752971910000060
133
Koenig-Archibugi M. Is global democracy possible? European Journal of International Relations 2011;17:519–42. doi:10.1177/1354066110366056
134
David Miller. Against Global Democracy. In: After the nation?: critical reflections on nationalism and post-nationalism. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2010.
135
Näsström S. The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle. Political Studies 2011;59:116–34. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00845.x
136
GOODIN RE. Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives. Philosophy & Public Affairs 2007;35:40–68. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00098.x
137
Macdonald T. Global Stakeholder Democracy. Oxford University Press 2008. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199235001.001.0001
138
Thompson DF. Democratic Theory and Global Society. Journal of Political Philosophy 1999;7:111–25. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00069
139
Gould CC. Globalizing democracy and human rights. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511617096
140
David Held. Democracy and the International System. In: Cosmopolitan democracy: an agenda for a new world order. Cambridge, UK: : Polity Press 1995.
141
Robert Dahl. Can International Organisations be Democratic? In: Democracy’s edges. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1999.
142
Cabrera, Luis. The Inconveniences of Transnational Democracy. Ethics and International Affairs 1AD;21:219–38.https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ethics-and-international-affairs/article/inconveniences-of-transnational-democracy/96027C6EE6E68D572DE43E93F9E2C8A8
143
Ronald Dworkin. The Original Position. The University of Chicago Law Review 1973;40:500–33.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1599246?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
144
Daniel Star, Candice Delmas. Three Conceptions of Practical Authority. Jurisprudence;21:143–60. doi:10.5235/204033211796290272
145
May T. On Raz and the Obligation to Obey the Law. Law and Philosophy;16:19–36.https://www.jstor.org/stable/3504817?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
146
Dagger R. Membership, Fair Play, and Political Obligation. Political Studies 2000;48:104–17. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00253
147
A. John Simmons. Fair Play and Political Obligation: Twenty Years Later. In: Justification and Legitimacy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511625152
148
Dworkin R. Civil disobedience and nuclear protest. In: A matter of principle. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1986.
149
Smith W. Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience. Res Publica 2004;10:353–77. doi:10.1007/s11158-004-2327-5
150
JOHN MORREALL. The Justifiability of Violent Civil Disobedience. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2013;6:35–47.http://www-tandfonline-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/00455091.1976.10716975
151
Martin L. King. Letter from Birmingham Jail. https://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
152
Markovitz D. ‘Democratic Disobedience’. Yale Law Journal 2005;114.https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/418/
153
W. B. Gallie. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1956;56:167–98.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/4544562?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
