1.
Goodin, R.E., Pettit, P., Pogge, T. eds: A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Wiley (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405177245.
2.
Wolff, J.: An introduction to political philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006).
3.
Simmons, A.J.: Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1979).
4.
Horton, J.: Political obligation. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1992).
5.
Richard B. Friedman: On the Concept of Authority in Political Philosophy. In: Political obligation. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1992).
6.
Robert P. Wolff: The Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy’. In: In defense of anarchism. Harper & Row, New York (1976).
7.
Harry G. Frankfurt: The Anarchism of Robert Paul Wolff. Political Theory. 1, 405–414 (1973).
8.
Green, L.: The authority of the state. Clarendon, Oxford (1988).
9.
Richard Tuck: Why is Authority Such a Problem? In: Philosophy, politics and society: 4th series. Blackwell, Oxford (1972).
10.
Jo Wolff: Anarchism and Skepticism. In: For and against the state: new philosophical readings. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Md (1996).
11.
John Simmons: Philosophical Anarchism. In: For and against the state: new philosophical readings. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Md (1996).
12.
A. John Simmons: Justification and Legitimacy*. Ethics. 109, 739–771 (1999).
13.
Richard Dworkin: The Puzzle of Legitimacy’. In: Law’s empire. Hart, Oxford (1998).
14.
Ripstein, A.: Authority and Coercion. Philosophy Public Affairs. 32, 2–35 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00003.x.
15.
Horton, J.: Political obligation. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1992).
16.
Simmons, A.J.: Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1979).
17.
Miller, D.: Anarchism. Dent, London (1984).
18.
Pitkin, H.: Obligation and Consent--I. The American Political Science Review. 59, (1965). https://doi.org/10.2307/1953218.
19.
Hanna Pitkin: Obligation and Consent--II. The American Political Science Review. 60, 39–52 (1966).
20.
Joseph Raz: Authority and Justification. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 14, 3–29 (1985).
21.
Patrick Durning: Joseph Raz and the Instrumental Justification of a Duty to Obey the Law. Law and Philosophy. 22, 597–620 (2003).
22.
Locke, J., Locke, J., Gough, J.W.: The second treatise of civil government: and, A letter concerning toleration. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1948).
23.
Hume, D., MacIntyre, A.C.: Hume’s ethical writings: selections from David Hume. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Ind (1979).
24.
A. John Simmons: Tacit Consent and Political Obligation. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 5, 274–291 (1976).
25.
Simmons, A.J.: Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1979).
26.
John Horton: Chapters 2,3,4,. In: Political obligation. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1992).
27.
Beran, H.: The consent theory of political obligation. Croom Helm, London.
28.
Ronald Dworkin: The Original Position. The University of Chicago Law Review. 40, 500–533 (1973).
29.
Margaret Gilbert: Reconsidering the ‘Actual Contract’ and Theory of Political Obligation*. Ethics. 109, 236–260 (1999).
30.
Darwall, S.: Authority, Accountability, and Preemption. Jurisprudence. 2, 103–119 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5235/204033211796290263.
31.
Daniel Star, Candice Delmas: Three Conceptions of Practical Authority. Jurisprudence. 21, 143–160. https://doi.org/10.5235/204033211796290272.
32.
May, T.: On Raz and the Obligation to Obey the Law. Law and Philosophy. 16, 19–36.
33.
Pateman, C.: The problem of political obligation: a critique of liberal theory. Polity in association with Blackwell, Cambridge (1985).
34.
Hanna Pitkin: Obligation and Consent--II. The American Political Science Review. 60, 39–52 (1966).
35.
A. John Simmons: Tacit Consent and Political Obligation. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 5, 274–291 (1976).
36.
John Horton: Chapters 2,3,4,. In: Political obligation. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1992).
37.
George Klosko: Presumptive Benefit, Fairness, and Political Obligation. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 16, 241–259 (1987).
38.
Horton, J.: In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part One. Political Studies. 54, 427–443 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00621.x.
39.
Horton, J.: In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part Two. Political Studies. 55, 1–19 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00642.x.
40.
Dagger, R.: Membership, Fair Play, and Political Obligation. Political Studies. 48, 104–117 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00253.
41.
George Klosko: Multiple Principles of Political Obligation. Political Theory. 32, 801–824 (2004).
42.
A. John Simmons: Fair Play and Political Obligation: Twenty Years Later. In: Justification and Legitimacy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625152.
43.
A. John Simmons: Associative Political Obligations. Ethics. 106, 247–273 (1996).
44.
Klosko, G.: The principle of fairness and political obligation. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Md (2004).
45.
Richard J. Arneson: The Principle of Fairness and Free-Rider Problems. Ethics. 92, 616–633 (1982).
46.
John Rawls: Legal Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play. In: Collected papers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1999).
47.
Dworkin, R.: Law’s empire. Fontana, London (1986).
48.
McDermott, D.: Fair-Play Obligations. Political Studies. 52, 216–232 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00476.x.
49.
Nozick, R.: Anarchy, state, and utopia. Blackwell, Oxford (1974).
50.
Tamir, Y.: Liberal nationalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1993).
51.
Andrew Mason: Special Obligations to Compatriots. Ethics. 107, 427–447 (1997).
52.
Christopher Heath Wellman: Associative Allegiances and Political Obligations. Social Theory and Practice. 23, 181–204 (1997).
53.
Jo Wolff: Political Obligation: A Pluralistic Approach. In: Pluralism: the philosophy and politics of diversity. Routledge, London (2000).
54.
Rawls, J.: A theory of justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1999).
55.
Brownlee, K.: Features of a Paradigm Case of Civil Disobedience. Res Publica. 10, 337–351 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-004-2326-6.
56.
Dworkin, R.: Civil disobedience and nuclear protest. In: A matter of principle. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1986).
57.
Ronald Dworkin: Civil Disobedience. In: Taking rights seriously. Duckworth, London (1977).
58.
Brownlee, K.: Conscience and Conviction. Oxford University Press (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592944.001.0001.
59.
LYONS, D.: Moral Judgment, Historical Reality, and Civil Disobedience. Philosophy Public Affairs. 27, 31–49 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00058.x.
60.
Haksar, V.: Rawls and Gandhi on civil disobedience. Inquiry. 19, 151–192 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747608601790.
61.
Smith, W.: Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience. Res Publica. 10, 353–377 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-004-2327-5.
62.
JOHN MORREALL: The Justifiability of Violent Civil Disobedience. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 6, 35–47 (2013).
63.
Martin L. King: Letter from Birmingham Jail.
64.
Simmons, A.J.: Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1979).
65.
Markovitz, D.: ‘Democratic Disobedience’. Yale Law Journal. 114, (2005).
66.
David Lefkowitz: On a Moral Right to Civil Disobedience*. Ethics. 117, 202–233 (2007).
67.
Singer, P.: Democracy and disobedience. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1973).
68.
Adam, J., Plato: Platonis Crito. University press, Cambridge (1903).
69.
Raz, J.: The authority of lawEssays on law and morality. Oxford University Press (1979). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.001.0001.
70.
Walzer, M.: Obligations: essays on disobedience, war, and citizenship. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.) (1970).
71.
Sabl, A.: Looking Forward to Justice: Rawlsian Civil Disobedience and its Non-Rawlsian Lessons. Journal of Political Philosophy. 9, 331–349 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00129.
72.
David Enoch: Some Arguments against Conscientious Objection and Civil Disobedience Refuted. Israel Law Review. 36, 227–253 (2002).
73.
BUCHANAN, A.: Theories of Secession. Philosophy Public Affairs. 26, 31–61 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00049.x.
74.
Alan Patten: Democratic Secession from a Multinational State*. Ethics. 112, 558–586 (2002).
75.
Daniel Philpott: In Defense of Self-Determination. Ethics. 105, 352–385 (1995).
76.
Moore, M. ed: National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford University Press (1998). https://doi.org/10.1093/0198293844.001.0001.
77.
David Miller: Secession and the Principle of Nationality. In: Moore, M. (ed.) National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford University Press (1998). https://doi.org/10.1093/0198293844.001.0001.
78.
Moore, M. ed: National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford University Press (1998). https://doi.org/10.1093/0198293844.001.0001.
79.
Margaret Moore: The Ethics of Secession and a Normative Theory of Nationalism. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. 13, 225–250.
80.
David Gauthier: Breaking up: An Essay on Secession. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 24, 357–371 (1994).
81.
Brilmayer, Lea: Secession and Self-Determination: A Territorial Interpretation. Yale Journal of International Law. 16, 177–202 (1991).
82.
Christopher H. Wellman: A Defense of Secession and Political Self-Determination. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 24, 142–171 (1995).
83.
Wellman, C.H.: A theory of secession: the case for political self-determination. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005).
84.
Buchanan, A.E.: Secession: the morality of political divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec. Westview Press, Boulder (1991).
85.
Buchanan, A.: Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination. Oxford University Press (2003). https://doi.org/10.1093/0198295359.001.0001.
86.
Macedo, S., Buchanan, A.E.: Secession and self-determination. New York University Press, New York, London (2003).
87.
W. B. Gallie: Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 56, 167–198 (1956).
88.
LIST, C.: The Logical Space of Democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 39, 262–297 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01206.x.
89.
Gutmann, A.: Democracy. In: Goodin, R.E., Pettit, P., and Pogge, T. (eds.) A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Wiley (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405177245.
90.
Sen, A.K.: Democracy as a Universal Value. Journal of Democracy. 10, 3–17 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1999.0055.
91.
Weale, A.: Democracy. Palgrave, Basingstoke (1999).
92.
Estlund, D.M.: Democracy. Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA (2001).
93.
Democracy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/democracy/.
94.
Brian Barry: Is Democracy Special? In: Democracy and power: essays in political theory I. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1991).
95.
Schumpeter, J.A.: Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. G. Allen & Unwin Ltd, London (1943).
96.
Quinton, A.: Political philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1967).
97.
Dahl, R.A.: Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press, New Haven (1989).
98.
Dworkin, R.: Justice for hedgehogs. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (2011).
99.
Christiano, T.: The rule of the many: fundamental issues in democratic theory. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo (1996).
100.
Gordon Graham: What is Special About Democracy? Mind. 92, 94–102 (1983).
101.
Dahl, R.A.: Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press, New Haven (1989).
102.
Richard Arneson: Democracy is not Intrinsically Just. In: Justice and democracy: essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).
103.
Parijs, P.: Justice and Democracy: Are they Incompatible?*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 4, 101–117 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.1996.tb00044.x.
104.
Griffin, C.G.: Democracy as a Non-Instrumentally Just Procedure. Journal of Political Philosophy. 11, 111–121 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00169.
105.
Arneson, R.J.: Defending the Purely Instrumental Account of Democratic Legitimacy. Journal of Political Philosophy. 11, 122–132 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00170.
106.
Christiano, T.: The Authority of Democracy*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 12, 266–290 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00200.x.
107.
Joshua Cohen: Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In: The Good polity: normative analysis of the state. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1989).
108.
Review by: Joshua Cohen: Reflections on Rousseau: Autonomy and Democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 15, 275–297 (1986).
109.
Valentini, L.: Justice, Disagreement and Democracy. British Journal of Political Science. 43, 177–199 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000294.
110.
Ross, M.: Is Democracy Good for the Poor? American Journal of Political Science. 50, 860–874 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00220.x.
111.
Estlund, D.M.: Democratic authority: a philosophical framework. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008).
112.
Walzer, M.: Spheres of justice: a defense of pluralism and equality. Basic Books, New York (1983).
113.
Young, I.M.: Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press (2002). https://doi.org/10.1093/0198297556.001.0001.
114.
Beitz, C.R.: Political equality: an essay in democratic theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1989).
115.
Jeremy Waldron: The Wisdom of the Multitude: Some Reflections on Book 3, Chapter 11 of Aristotle’s Politics. Political Theory. 23, 563–584 (1995).
116.
Jeremy Waldron: The Core of the Case against Judicial Review. The Yale Law Journal. 115, 1346–1406 (2006).
117.
Brettschneider, C.: Balancing Procedures and Outcomes Within Democratic Theory: Core Values and Judicial Review. Political Studies. 53, 423–441 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00536.x.
118.
Allen Buchanan: Political Legitimacy and Democracy*. Ethics. 112, 689–719 (2002).
119.
Anne Phillips: Democracy and Difference: Some Problems for Feminist Theory. In: The rights of minority cultures. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997).
120.
Risse, M.: Arguing for Majority Rule*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 12, 41–64 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00190.x.
121.
Christiano, T.: The Constitution of Equality. Oxford University Press (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198297475.001.0001.
122.
Democracy, Political Equality, and Majority Rule*. Ethics. 121, 148–177 (2010).
123.
Harrison, R.: Democracy. Routledge (2002). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203005545.
124.
Weale, A.: Democracy. Palgrave, Basingstoke (1999).
125.
Steven Macedo: Against Majoritarianism: Democratic Values and Institutional Design. Boston University Law Review. 90, 1029–1042.
126.
Waldron, J.: Law and Disagreement. Oxford University Press (1999). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001.
127.
Noveck, Scott M.: Is Judicial Review Compatible with Democracy? Cardozo Public Law, Policy, and Ethics Journal. 6, 401–430 (2007).
128.
Dworkin, R.: Law’s empire. Fontana, London (1986).
129.
Christiano, T.: The Authority of Democracy*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 12, 266–290 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00200.x.
130.
LIST, C., KOENIG-ARCHIBUGI, M.: Can There Be a Global Demos? An Agency-Based Approach. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 38, 76–110 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01174.x.
131.
Miller, D.: Democracy’s Domain. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 37, 201–228 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01158.x.
132.
Goodin, R.E.: Global democracy: in the beginning. International Theory. 2, 175–209 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971910000060.
133.
Koenig-Archibugi, M.: Is global democracy possible? European Journal of International Relations. 17, 519–542 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110366056.
134.
David Miller: Against Global Democracy. In: After the nation?: critical reflections on nationalism and post-nationalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2010).
135.
Näsström, S.: The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle. Political Studies. 59, 116–134 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00845.x.
136.
GOODIN, R.E.: Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 35, 40–68 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00098.x.
137.
Macdonald, T.: Global Stakeholder Democracy. Oxford University Press (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199235001.001.0001.
138.
Thompson, D.F.: Democratic Theory and Global Society. Journal of Political Philosophy. 7, 111–125 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00069.
139.
Gould, C.C.: Globalizing democracy and human rights. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).
140.
David Held: Democracy and the International System. In: Cosmopolitan democracy: an agenda for a new world order. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK (1995).
141.
Robert Dahl: Can International Organisations be Democratic? In: Democracy’s edges. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999).
142.
Cabrera, Luis: The Inconveniences of Transnational Democracy. Ethics and International Affairs. 21, 219–238 (1)AD.
143.
Ronald Dworkin: The Original Position. The University of Chicago Law Review. 40, 500–533 (1973).
144.
Daniel Star, Candice Delmas: Three Conceptions of Practical Authority. Jurisprudence. 21, 143–160. https://doi.org/10.5235/204033211796290272.
145.
May, T.: On Raz and the Obligation to Obey the Law. Law and Philosophy. 16, 19–36.
146.
Dagger, R.: Membership, Fair Play, and Political Obligation. Political Studies. 48, 104–117 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00253.
147.
A. John Simmons: Fair Play and Political Obligation: Twenty Years Later. In: Justification and Legitimacy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625152.
148.
Dworkin, R.: Civil disobedience and nuclear protest. In: A matter of principle. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1986).
149.
Smith, W.: Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience. Res Publica. 10, 353–377 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-004-2327-5.
150.
JOHN MORREALL: The Justifiability of Violent Civil Disobedience. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 6, 35–47 (2013).
151.
Martin L. King: Letter from Birmingham Jail.
152.
Markovitz, D.: ‘Democratic Disobedience’. Yale Law Journal. 114, (2005).
153.
W. B. Gallie: Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 56, 167–198 (1956).
