[1]
R. E. Goodin, P. Pettit, and T. Pogge, Eds., A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Wiley, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781405177245
[2]
J. Wolff, An introduction to political philosophy, Rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
[3]
A. J. Simmons, Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979.
[4]
J. Horton, Political obligation, vol. Issues in political theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992.
[5]
Richard B. Friedman, ‘On the Concept of Authority in Political Philosophy’, in Political obligation, vol. Issues in political theory, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992.
[6]
Robert P. Wolff, ‘The Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy’’, in In defense of anarchism, vol. Harper essays in philosophy, New York: Harper & Row, 1976.
[7]
Harry G. Frankfurt, ‘The Anarchism of Robert Paul Wolff’, Political Theory, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 405–414, 1973 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/191060
[8]
L. Green, The authority of the state. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988.
[9]
Richard Tuck, ‘Why is Authority Such a Problem?’, in Philosophy, politics and society: 4th series, Oxford: Blackwell, 1972.
[10]
Jo Wolff, ‘Anarchism and Skepticism’, in For and against the state: new philosophical readings, vol. Studies in social, political, and legal philosophy, Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996.
[11]
John Simmons, ‘Philosophical Anarchism’, in For and against the state: new philosophical readings, vol. Studies in social, political, and legal philosophy, Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996.
[12]
A. John Simmons, ‘Justification and Legitimacy*’, Ethics, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 739–771, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/233944
[13]
Richard Dworkin, ‘The Puzzle of Legitimacy’’, in Law’s empire, Oxford: Hart, 1998.
[14]
A. Ripstein, ‘Authority and Coercion’, Philosophy Public Affairs, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 2–35, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00003.x.
[15]
J. Horton, Political obligation, vol. Issues in political theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992.
[16]
A. J. Simmons, Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979.
[17]
D. Miller, Anarchism, vol. Modern ideologies. London: Dent, 1984.
[18]
H. Pitkin, ‘Obligation and Consent--I’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 59, no. 4, Dec. 1965, doi: 10.2307/1953218.
[19]
Hanna Pitkin, ‘Obligation and Consent--II’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 39–52, 1966 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1953805?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[20]
Joseph Raz, ‘Authority and Justification’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 3–29, 1985 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265235
[21]
Patrick Durning, ‘Joseph Raz and the Instrumental Justification of a Duty to Obey the Law’, Law and Philosophy, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 597–620, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3505046
[22]
J. Locke, J. Locke, and J. W. Gough, The second treatise of civil government: and, A letter concerning toleration. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1948.
[23]
D. Hume and A. C. MacIntyre, Hume’s ethical writings: selections from David Hume. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press, 1979.
[24]
A. John Simmons, ‘Tacit Consent and Political Obligation’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 274–291, 1976 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2264884?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[25]
A. J. Simmons, Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979.
[26]
John Horton, ‘Chapters 2,3,4’, in Political obligation, vol. Issues in political theory, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992.
[27]
H. Beran, The consent theory of political obligation, vol. Croom Helm international series in social and political thought. London: Croom Helm.
[28]
Ronald Dworkin, ‘The Original Position’, The University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 500–533, 1973 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1599246?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[29]
Margaret Gilbert, ‘Reconsidering the “Actual Contract” and Theory of Political Obligation*’, Ethics, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 236–260, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/233895
[30]
S. Darwall, ‘Authority, Accountability, and Preemption’, Jurisprudence, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 103–119, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.5235/204033211796290263.
[31]
Daniel Star and Candice Delmas, ‘Three Conceptions of Practical Authority’, Jurisprudence, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 143–160, doi: 10.5235/204033211796290272. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.5235/204033211796290272
[32]
T. May, ‘On Raz and the Obligation to Obey the Law’, Law and Philosophy, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 19–36 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3504817?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[33]
C. Pateman, The problem of political obligation: a critique of liberal theory. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell, 1985.
[34]
Hanna Pitkin, ‘Obligation and Consent--II’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 39–52, 1966 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1953805?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[35]
A. John Simmons, ‘Tacit Consent and Political Obligation’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 274–291, 1976 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2264884?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[36]
John Horton, ‘Chapters 2,3,4’, in Political obligation, vol. Issues in political theory, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992.
[37]
George Klosko, ‘Presumptive Benefit, Fairness, and Political Obligation’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 241–259, 1987 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265266
[38]
J. Horton, ‘In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part One’, Political Studies, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 427–443, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00621.x.
[39]
J. Horton, ‘In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part Two’, Political Studies, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 1–19, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00642.x.
[40]
R. Dagger, ‘Membership, Fair Play, and Political Obligation’, Political Studies, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 104–117, Mar. 2000, doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00253.
[41]
George Klosko, ‘Multiple Principles of Political Obligation’, Political Theory, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 801–824, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4148146
[42]
A. John Simmons, ‘Fair Play and Political Obligation: Twenty Years Later’, in Justification and Legitimacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511625152
[43]
A. John Simmons, ‘Associative Political Obligations’, Ethics, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 247–273, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382059
[44]
G. Klosko, The principle of fairness and political obligation, New ed., vol. Studies in social, political, and legal philosophy. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.
[45]
Richard J. Arneson, ‘The Principle of Fairness and Free-Rider Problems’, Ethics, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 616–633, 1982 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2380394
[46]
John Rawls, ‘Legal Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play’, in Collected papers, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1999.
[47]
R. Dworkin, Law’s empire, vol. Fontana master guides. London: Fontana, 1986.
[48]
D. McDermott, ‘Fair-Play Obligations’, Political Studies, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 216–232, Jun. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00476.x.
[49]
R. Nozick, Anarchy, state, and utopia. Oxford: Blackwell, 1974.
[50]
Y. Tamir, Liberal nationalism, vol. Studies in moral, political, and legal philosophy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1993.
[51]
Andrew Mason, ‘Special Obligations to Compatriots’, Ethics, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 427–447, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382324
[52]
Christopher Heath Wellman, ‘Associative Allegiances and Political Obligations’, Social Theory and Practice, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 181–204, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23559181
[53]
Jo Wolff, ‘Political Obligation: A Pluralistic Approach’, in Pluralism: the philosophy and politics of diversity, London: Routledge, 2000.
[54]
J. Rawls, A theory of justice, Rev. ed. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.
[55]
K. Brownlee, ‘Features of a Paradigm Case of Civil Disobedience’, Res Publica, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 337–351, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1007/s11158-004-2326-6.
[56]
R. Dworkin, ‘Civil disobedience and nuclear protest’, in A matter of principle, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.
[57]
Ronald Dworkin, ‘Civil Disobedience’, in Taking rights seriously, London: Duckworth, 1977.
[58]
K. Brownlee, Conscience and Conviction. Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592944.001.0001/acprof-9780199592944
[59]
D. LYONS, ‘Moral Judgment, Historical Reality, and Civil Disobedience’, Philosophy Public Affairs, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 31–49, Jan. 1998, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00058.x.
[60]
V. Haksar, ‘Rawls and Gandhi on civil disobedience’, Inquiry, vol. 19, no. 1–4, pp. 151–192, Jan. 1976, doi: 10.1080/00201747608601790.
[61]
W. Smith, ‘Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience’, Res Publica, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 353–377, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1007/s11158-004-2327-5.
[62]
JOHN MORREALL, ‘The Justifiability of Violent Civil Disobedience’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 35–47, Jul. 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www-tandfonline-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/00455091.1976.10716975
[63]
Martin L. King, ‘Letter from Birmingham Jail’ [Online]. Available: https://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
[64]
A. J. Simmons, Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979.
[65]
D. Markovitz, ‘“Democratic Disobedience”’, Yale Law Journal, vol. 114, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/418/
[66]
David Lefkowitz, ‘On a Moral Right to Civil Disobedience*’, Ethics, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 202–233, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/510694
[67]
P. Singer, Democracy and disobedience. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.
[68]
J. Adam and Plato, Platonis Crito, vol. Pitt press series. Cambridge: University press, 1903.
[69]
J. Raz, The authority of lawEssays on law and morality. Oxford University Press, 1979 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.001.0001/acprof-9780198253457
[70]
M. Walzer, Obligations: essays on disobedience, war, and citizenship. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1970.
[71]
A. Sabl, ‘Looking Forward to Justice: Rawlsian Civil Disobedience and its Non-Rawlsian Lessons’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 331–349, Sep. 2001, doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00129.
[72]
David Enoch, ‘Some Arguments against Conscientious Objection and Civil Disobedience Refuted’, Israel Law Review, vol. 36, pp. 227–253, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/israel36&id=629&collection=journals&index=journals/israel
[73]
A. BUCHANAN, ‘Theories of Secession’, Philosophy Public Affairs, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 31–61, Jan. 1997, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00049.x.
[74]
Alan Patten, ‘Democratic Secession from a Multinational State*’, Ethics, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 558–586, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/338778
[75]
Daniel Philpott, ‘In Defense of Self-Determination’, Ethics, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 352–385, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382349
[76]
M. Moore, Ed., National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford University Press, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198293844.001.0001/acprof-9780198293842
[77]
David Miller, ‘Secession and the Principle of Nationality’, in National Self-Determination and Secession, M. Moore, Ed. Oxford University Press, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198293844.001.0001/acprof-9780198293842
[78]
M. Moore, Ed., National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford University Press, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198293844.001.0001/acprof-9780198293842
[79]
Margaret Moore, ‘The Ethics of Secession and a Normative Theory of Nationalism’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 225–250 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/caljp13&id=227&collection=journals&index=journals/caljp
[80]
David Gauthier, ‘Breaking up: An Essay on Secession’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 357–371, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40231872
[81]
Brilmayer, Lea, ‘Secession and Self-Determination: A Territorial Interpretation’, Yale Journal of International Law, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 177–202, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjil16&id=183&collection=journals&index=journals/yjil
[82]
Christopher H. Wellman, ‘A Defense of Secession and Political Self-Determination’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 142–171, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265391
[83]
C. H. Wellman, A theory of secession: the case for political self-determination. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/theory-of-secession/79CF1B218C8B49C0EBC9E1493DB75ED7
[84]
A. E. Buchanan, Secession: the morality of political divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec. Boulder: Westview Press, 1991.
[85]
A. Buchanan, Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination. Oxford University Press, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198295359.001.0001/acprof-9780198295358
[86]
S. Macedo and A. E. Buchanan, Secession and self-determination, vol. Nomos. New York, London: New York University Press, 2003.
[87]
W. B. Gallie, ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 56, pp. 167–198, 1956 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/4544562?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[88]
C. LIST, ‘The Logical Space of Democracy’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 262–297, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01206.x.
[89]
A. Gutmann, ‘Democracy’, in A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, R. E. Goodin, P. Pettit, and T. Pogge, Eds. Wiley, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781405177245
[90]
A. K. Sen, ‘Democracy as a Universal Value’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 3–17, 1999, doi: 10.1353/jod.1999.0055.
[91]
A. Weale, Democracy, vol. Issues in political theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1999.
[92]
D. M. Estlund, Democracy, vol. Blackwell readings in philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2001.
[93]
‘Democracy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’. [Online]. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/democracy/
[94]
Brian Barry, ‘Is Democracy Special?’, in Democracy and power: essays in political theory I, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.
[95]
J. A. Schumpeter, Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London: G. Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1943.
[96]
A. Quinton, Political philosophy, vol. Oxford readings in philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967.
[97]
R. A. Dahl, Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989 [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=52831&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
[98]
R. Dworkin, Justice for hedgehogs. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://search-ebscohost-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=364811&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
[99]
T. Christiano, The rule of the many: fundamental issues in democratic theory, vol. Focus (Southern Regional Education Board). Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1996.
[100]
Gordon Graham, ‘What is Special About Democracy?’, Mind, vol. 92, no. 365, pp. 94–102, 1983 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2253932
[101]
R. A. Dahl, Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989 [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=52831&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
[102]
Richard Arneson, ‘Democracy is not Intrinsically Just’, in Justice and democracy: essays for Brian Barry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
[103]
P. Parijs, ‘Justice and Democracy: Are they Incompatible?*’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 101–117, Jun. 1996, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.1996.tb00044.x.
[104]
C. G. Griffin, ‘Democracy as a Non-Instrumentally Just Procedure’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 111–121, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00169.
[105]
R. J. Arneson, ‘Defending the Purely Instrumental Account of Democratic Legitimacy’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 122–132, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00170.
[106]
T. Christiano, ‘The Authority of Democracy*’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 266–290, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00200.x.
[107]
Joshua Cohen, ‘Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy’, in The Good polity: normative analysis of the state, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.
[108]
Review by: Joshua Cohen, ‘Reflections on Rousseau: Autonomy and Democracy’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 275–297, 1986 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265213
[109]
L. Valentini, ‘Justice, Disagreement and Democracy’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 43, no. 01, pp. 177–199, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1017/S0007123412000294.
[110]
M. Ross, ‘Is Democracy Good for the Poor?’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 860–874, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00220.x.
[111]
D. M. Estlund, Democratic authority: a philosophical framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781400831548
[112]
M. Walzer, Spheres of justice: a defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
[113]
I. M. Young, Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198297556.001.0001/acprof-9780198297550
[114]
C. R. Beitz, Political equality: an essay in democratic theory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1989.
[115]
Jeremy Waldron, ‘The Wisdom of the Multitude: Some Reflections on Book 3, Chapter 11 of Aristotle’s Politics’, Political Theory, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 563–584, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/191901
[116]
Jeremy Waldron, ‘The Core of the Case against Judicial Review’, The Yale Law Journal, vol. 115, no. 6, pp. 1346–1406, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/20455656?origin=crossref
[117]
C. Brettschneider, ‘Balancing Procedures and Outcomes Within Democratic Theory: Core Values and Judicial Review’, Political Studies, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 423–441, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00536.x.
[118]
Allen Buchanan, ‘Political Legitimacy and Democracy*’, Ethics, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 689–719, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/340313
[119]
Anne Phillips, ‘Democracy and Difference: Some Problems for Feminist Theory’, in The rights of minority cultures, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
[120]
M. Risse, ‘Arguing for Majority Rule*’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 41–64, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00190.x.
[121]
T. Christiano, The Constitution of Equality. Oxford University Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198297475.001.0001/acprof-9780198297475
[122]
‘Democracy, Political Equality, and Majority Rule*’, Ethics, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 148–177, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/656474
[123]
R. Harrison, Democracy. Routledge, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134790692
[124]
A. Weale, Democracy, vol. Issues in political theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1999.
[125]
Steven Macedo, ‘Against Majoritarianism: Democratic Values and Institutional Design’, Boston University Law Review, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 1029–1042 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=1029&handle=hein.journals%2Fbulr90&collection=journals
[126]
J. Waldron, Law and Disagreement. Oxford University Press, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001/acprof-9780198262138
[127]
Noveck, Scott M., ‘Is Judicial Review Compatible with Democracy?’, Cardozo Public Law, Policy, and Ethics Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 401–430, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/cardplp6&id=407&collection=journals&index=journals/cardplp
[128]
R. Dworkin, Law’s empire, vol. Fontana master guides. London: Fontana, 1986.
[129]
T. Christiano, ‘The Authority of Democracy*’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 266–290, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00200.x.
[130]
C. LIST and M. KOENIG-ARCHIBUGI, ‘Can There Be a Global Demos? An Agency-Based Approach’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 76–110, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01174.x.
[131]
D. Miller, ‘Democracy’s Domain’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 201–228, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01158.x.
[132]
R. E. Goodin, ‘Global democracy: in the beginning’, International Theory, vol. 2, no. 02, pp. 175–209, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1017/S1752971910000060.
[133]
M. Koenig-Archibugi, ‘Is global democracy possible?’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 519–542, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1177/1354066110366056.
[134]
David Miller, ‘Against Global Democracy’, in After the nation?: critical reflections on nationalism and post-nationalism, vol. International political theory series, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
[135]
S. Näsström, ‘The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle’, Political Studies, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 116–134, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00845.x.
[136]
R. E. GOODIN, ‘Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 40–68, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00098.x.
[137]
T. Macdonald, Global Stakeholder Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199235001.001.0001/acprof-9780199235001
[138]
D. F. Thompson, ‘Democratic Theory and Global Society’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 111–125, Jun. 1999, doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00069.
[139]
C. C. Gould, Globalizing democracy and human rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511617096
[140]
David Held, ‘Democracy and the International System’, in Cosmopolitan democracy: an agenda for a new world order, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1995.
[141]
Robert Dahl, ‘Can International Organisations be Democratic?’, in Democracy’s edges, vol. Contemporary political theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[142]
Cabrera, Luis, ‘The Inconveniences of Transnational Democracy’, Ethics and International Affairs, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 219–238, 1AD [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ethics-and-international-affairs/article/inconveniences-of-transnational-democracy/96027C6EE6E68D572DE43E93F9E2C8A8
[143]
Ronald Dworkin, ‘The Original Position’, The University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 500–533, 1973 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1599246?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[144]
Daniel Star and Candice Delmas, ‘Three Conceptions of Practical Authority’, Jurisprudence, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 143–160, doi: 10.5235/204033211796290272. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.5235/204033211796290272
[145]
T. May, ‘On Raz and the Obligation to Obey the Law’, Law and Philosophy, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 19–36 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3504817?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[146]
R. Dagger, ‘Membership, Fair Play, and Political Obligation’, Political Studies, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 104–117, Mar. 2000, doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00253.
[147]
A. John Simmons, ‘Fair Play and Political Obligation: Twenty Years Later’, in Justification and Legitimacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511625152
[148]
R. Dworkin, ‘Civil disobedience and nuclear protest’, in A matter of principle, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.
[149]
W. Smith, ‘Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience’, Res Publica, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 353–377, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1007/s11158-004-2327-5.
[150]
JOHN MORREALL, ‘The Justifiability of Violent Civil Disobedience’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 35–47, Jul. 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www-tandfonline-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/00455091.1976.10716975
[151]
Martin L. King, ‘Letter from Birmingham Jail’ [Online]. Available: https://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
[152]
D. Markovitz, ‘“Democratic Disobedience”’, Yale Law Journal, vol. 114, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/418/
[153]
W. B. Gallie, ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 56, pp. 167–198, 1956 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/4544562?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
