A. Cuthbert (2014) ‘Chapter  6: Urban Design and Spatial Political Economy’, in Companion to Urban Design. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203844434.
A. Escobar (1996) ‘The making and the unmaking of the third world through development’, in The post-development reader. London: Zed Books. Available at:
AbdouMaliq Simone , and  Edgar Pieterse (2017) New Urban Worlds : Inhabiting Dissonant Times. Polity Press. Available at:
Abu-Orf, H. (2011) ‘Is planning possible in cities divided by violent conflict?’, International Development Planning Review, 33(3), pp. 321–342. doi: 10.3828/idpr.2011.16.
Akhil  Gupta and Ferguson, D. (no date) ‘Discipline and Practice:"The Field” As Site, Method, and Location In Anthropology’, …  locations: Boundaries and grounds of a …. Available at:
Amir, S. (2004) ‘Rethinking Design Policy in the Third World’, Design Issues, 20(4), pp. 68–75. doi: 10.1162/0747936042311995.
Appadurai, A. (2001) ‘Deep democracy: urban governmentality and the horizon of politics’, Environment and Urbanization, 13(2), pp. 23–43. doi: 10.1177/095624780101300203.
Awan, N., Schneider, T. and Till, J. (2011) ‘Chapter 3: The operations of spatial agency’, in Spatial agency: other ways of doing architecture. London: Routledge, pp. 69–82. Available at:
Barry, J. et al. (2018) ‘Unsettling planning theory’, Planning Theory, 17(3), pp. 418–438. doi: 10.1177/1473095218763842.
Bell, B. and Wakeford, K. (2008) Expanding architecture: design as activism. New York: Metropolis Books.
Blundell Jones, P., Petrescu, D. and Till, J. (eds) (2012) Architecture and participation. London: Routledge. Available at:
Blunt, A. and Dowling, R. M. (2006) ‘Setting up home: an introduction’, in Home. London: Routledge, pp. 1–31. Available at:
Boano, C. and Talocci, G. (2014) ‘Fences and Profanations: Questioning the Sacredness of Urban Design’, Journal of Urban Design, 19(5), pp. 700–721. doi: 10.1080/13574809.2014.943701.
Bower, R. (2017) Architecture and space re-imagined: learning from the difference, multiplicity, and otherness of development practice. New York: Routledge. Available at:
Burgess, J., Harrison, C. M. and Limb, M. (1988) ‘People, Parks and the Urban Green: A Study of Popular Meanings and Values for Open Spaces in the City’, Urban Studies, 25(6), pp. 455–473. doi: 10.1080/00420988820080631.
Burgess, R., Carmona, M. and Kolstee, T. (1997) ‘Contemporary policies for enablement and participation : a critical review’, in The challenge of sustainable cities: neoliberalism and urban strategies in developing countries. London: Zed, pp. 138–162. Available at:
Camillo Boano and William Hunter (2010) ‘Collaboration and the conflictual’, in The nightmare of participation: [crossbench praxis as a mode of criticality]. Berlin: Sternberg Press, pp. 91–104.
Carabelli, G. (2018a) ‘Grassroots Movements and the Production of (Other) Space(s) - published in The divided city and the grassroots: the (un)making of ethnic divisions in Mostar’, in. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at:
Carabelli, G. (2018b) The divided city and the grassroots: the (un)making of ethnic divisions in Mostar. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at:
Catalina Ortiz and Camillo Boano (no date) ‘The Medellín’s shifting geopolitics of informality : The Encircled Garden as a dispositive of civil disenfranchisement?’, in, pp. 189–207. doi: 10.4324/9781315659275-16.
Choguill, M. B. G. (1996) ‘A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries’, Habitat International, 20(3), pp. 431–444. doi: 10.1016/0197-3975(96)00020-3.
Cleaver, F. (2001) ‘Institutions, Agency and the Limitations of Participatory Approaches to Development’, in Participation: The New Tyranny? London: Zed Books, pp. 36–55.
Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (2001a) Participation: the new tyranny? London: Zed Books.
Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (2001b) ‘The case for participation as tyranny’, in Participation: the new tyranny? London: Zed Books, pp. 1–15. Available at:
Coole, D. (2007) ‘Experiencing Discourse: Corporeal Communicators and the Embodiment of Power’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9(3), pp. 413–433. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2006.00258.x.
Cornwall, A. (2006) ‘Historical perspectives on participation in development’, Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 44(1), pp. 62–83. doi: 10.1080/14662040600624460.
Cornwall, A. and Coelho, V. S. P. (2007) ‘Spaces for change?: The politics of participation in new democratic arenas’, in Spaces for change?: the politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas. London: Zed, pp. 1–29. Available at:
Cowan, R. (2001) ‘Placecheck: a user’s guide. .’ Urban Design Alliance .
D. M. Petrescu and K. Trogal (2017) ‘The social (re)production of Architecture in “crisis-riddled” times’, in Petrescu, D. and Trogal, K. (eds) The social (re)production of architecture: politics, values and actions in contemporary practice. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Derickson, K. D. (2016) ‘On the politics of recognition in critical urban scholarship’, Urban Geography, 37(6), pp. 824–829. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2015.1105483.
Doreen Massey (1992) ‘Politics and Space/Time’, New Left Review, 196. Available at:
Doucet, I. (2018) ‘Understanding social engagement in architecture’, in Karim, F. (ed.) The Routledge companion to architecture and social engagement. New York, NY: Routledge. Available at:
Dovey, K. (1985) ‘Home and homelessness’, in Home environments. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 33–64. Available at:
‘Environment and Urbanization’ (no date a). Sage. Available at:
‘Environment and Urbanization’ (no date b). Sage. Available at:
Erfan, A. (2017) ‘Confronting collective traumas: an exploration of therapeutic planning’, Planning Theory & Practice, 18(1), pp. 34–50. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2016.1249909.
Eyben, R., Harris, C. and Pettit, J. (2006) ‘Introduction: Exploring Power for Change’, IDS Bulletin, 37(6), pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2006.tb00318.x.
Fawaz, M. (2009) ‘Hezbollah as Urban Planner? Questions To and From Planning Theory’, Planning Theory, 8(4), pp. 323–334. doi: 10.1177/1473095209341327.
Fenster, T. (2009) ‘Cognitive Temporal Mapping: The Three Steps Method in Urban Planning’, Planning Theory & Practice, 10(4), pp. 479–498. doi: 10.1080/14649350903417266.
Flowerdew, R. and Martin, D. (2005) Methods in human geography: a guide for students doing a research project. 2nd ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall. Available at:
Forester, J. (2006) ‘Making Participation Work When Interests Conflict: Moving from Facilitating Dialogue and Moderating Debate to Mediating Negotiations’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(4), pp. 447–456. doi: 10.1080/01944360608976765.
Foucault, M. (1980) ‘The eye of power’, in Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Harlow: Longman, pp. 146–165.
Fraser, Nancy (no date) ‘Rethinking Recognition’, New Left Review, 3, pp. 1103–1124. Available at:
Frediani, A. A. (2016) ‘Re-imagining Participatory Design: Reflecting on the ASF-UK Change by Design Methodology’, Design Issues, 32(3), pp. 98–111. doi: 10.1162/DESI_a_00403.
Frediani, A. A. and Boano, C. (2012) ‘Processes for just products: the capability space of participatory design’, in The capability approach, technology and design. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 203–222. Available at:
Frediani, A. and Boano, C. (2012) ‘Processes for Just Products: the Capability Space of Participatory Design’, in The capability approach, technology and design. London: Springer. Available at:
Freire, P. and Bergman Ramos, M. (1996) Pedagogy of the oppressed. New revised edition. London: Penguin Books.
Gaventa, J. and Barrett, G. (2010) ‘So What Difference Does it Make? Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement’, IDS Working Papers, 2010(347), pp. 01–72. doi: 10.1111/j.2040-0209.2010.00347_2.x.
Glass, J. (2008) ‘Facing the Future by Designing in Resilience: An Architectural Perspective’, in Hazards and the built environment: attaining built-in resilience. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 172–188. Available at:
Hamdi, N. (2004a) ‘Chapter 11. Governance and networks: organizing from inside out’, in Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. London: Earthscan, pp. 107–115.
Hamdi, N. (2004b) ‘Chapter 6. In Search of a Community and Structure of Place’, in Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. London: Earthscan, pp. 58–72.
Hamdi, N. (2004c) Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. London: Earthscan.
Hamdi, N. (2010) ‘Chapter 8. PEAS and the Sociable Side of Practice’, in The placemaker’s guide to building community. London: Earthscan, pp. 141–152.
Hamdi, N. (2010) ‘Chapter 9. Reasoning to Scale’, in The placemaker’s guide to building community. London: Earthscan, pp. 160–153.
Hamdi, N. (2014a) ‘Chapter 12. Insiders Out and Outsiders: Practical wisdom and the co-Production of Knowledge’, in The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice. New York, NY: Routledge. Available at:
Hamdi, N. (2014b) ‘Chapter 3. Deciding how to design’, in The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice. New York, NY: Routledge. Available at:
Hamdi, N. (2014c) ‘Chapter 7. Participation in practice’, in The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice. New York, NY: Routledge. Available at:
Hamdi, N. and Goethert, R. (1997) ‘Chapter 2. Action Planning In Theory’, in Action planning for cities: a guide to community practice. Chichester: John Wiley, pp. 23–59.
Haraway, D. (1988) ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective’, Feminist Studies, 14(3). doi: 10.2307/3178066.
Harithy, H. Al- (2015) ‘The participative discourse: community activism in post-war reconstruction.’, in Saliba, R. (ed.) Urban design in the Arab world: reconceptualizing boundaries. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate, pp. 39–50. Available at:
Hickey, S. and Mohan, G. (2004) ‘Towards Participation as Transformation: Critical Themes and Challenges’, in Participation: from tyranny to transformation? : exploring new approaches to participation in development. London: Zed, pp. 3–24. Available at:
Hirst, P. Q. (2005) Space and power: politics, war and architecture. Cambridge: Polity.
Hou, J. (2014) ‘Citizen Design: participation and beyond.’, in Companion to Urban Design. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203844434.ch25.
Irazábal, C. (2016) ‘Public, Private, People Partnerships (PPPPs): Reflections from Latin American Cases’, in Lehavi, A. (ed.) Private communities and urban governance: theoretical and comparative perspectives. Switzerland: Springer, pp. 191–214. Available at:,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1224661&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
Jenkins, P., Smith, H. and Wang, Y. P. (2007) ‘Post-1990 issues in planning and housing’, in Planning and housing in the rapidly urbanising world. London: Routledge, pp. 178–203. Available at:
Jeremy Till (2009) ‘Imperfect ethics’, in Architecture depends. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, pp. 171–187. Available at:
John Forester (1989) ‘Listening: the social policy of everyday life’, in Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press. Available at:
Kaminer, T. (2017) ‘Theories of participation, theories of contestation’, in The efficacy of architecture: political contestation and agency. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Kindon, S. L., Pain, R. and Kesby, M. (2007) ‘Participatory action research: origins, approaches and methods’, in Participatory action research approaches and methods: connecting people, participation and place. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 9–18. Available at:
Komarova, M. and McKnight, M. (2013) ‘“We Are Watching You Too”: Reflections on Doing Visual Research in a Contested City’, Sociological Research Online, 18(1). doi: 10.5153/sro.2877.
Kumar, S. (2002) ‘Conceptual specifications’, in Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing, pp. 23–52. Available at:
Lahoud, A. (2010) ‘Post-Traumatic Urbanism’, Architectural Design, 80(5), pp. 14–23. doi: 10.1002/ad.1128.
Lane, B. M. (2007) ‘What is home?’, in Housing and dwelling: perspectives on modern domestic architecture. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 50–73. Available at:
Laura Roth and Kate Shea Baird (no date) ‘Municipalism and the Feminization of Politics’, (6). Available at:
Lee, Y. (2008) ‘Design participation tactics: the challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process’, CoDesign, 4(1), pp. 31–50. doi: 10.1080/15710880701875613.
Leivas, M. (2018) ‘From the body to the city: participatory action research with social cartography for transformative education and global citizenship’, Educational Action Research, pp. 1–16. doi: 10.1080/09650792.2018.1519453.
Loo, S. (2012) ‘Design-Ing Ethics: the Good, the Bad and the Performative’, in Design and ethics: reflections on practice. London: Routledge. Available at:
Luansang, C., Boonmahathanakorn, S. and Domingo-Price, M. L. (2012) ‘The role of community architects in upgrading; reflecting on the experience in Asia’, Environment and Urbanization, 24(2), pp. 497–512. doi: 10.1177/0956247812456125.
Luansang, C., Boonmahathanakorn, S. and Domingo-Price, M. L. (2012) ‘The role of community architects in upgrading; reflecting on the experience in Asia’, Environment and Urbanization, 24(2), pp. 497–512. doi: 10.1177/0956247812456125.
Luck, R. (2007) ‘Learning to talk to users in participatory design situations’, Design Studies, 28(3), pp. 217–242. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.002.
Madanipour, A. (2010) ‘Introduction’, in Whose public space?: international case studies in urban design and development. London: Routledge, pp. 1–15. Available at:
Marcuse, P. (2009) ‘From critical urban theory to the right to the city’, City, 13(2-3), pp. 185–197. doi: 10.1080/13604810902982177.
Markus, T. A. and Cameron, D. (2002) ‘Why language matters’, in The words between the spaces: buildings and language. London: Routledge, pp. 1–17. Available at:
Martens, K. (2005) ‘Participatory Experiments from the Bottom up: The role of environmental NGOs and citizen groups’, European Journal of Spatial Development, 18, pp. 1–20. Available at:
Martin, D., McCann, E. and Purcell, M. (2003) ‘Space, Scale, Governance, and Representation: Contemporary Geographical Perspectives on Urban Politics and Policy’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(2), pp. 113–121. doi: 10.1111/1467-9906.t01-1-00001.
Mattila, H. (2002) ‘Aesthetic justice and urban planning: Who ought to have the right to design cities?’, GeoJournal, 58(2/3), pp. 131–138. doi: 10.1023/
‘McDowell, L (1992a), Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and research methods in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 17 399–416’ (no date). Available at:
McFarlane, C. (2006) ‘Knowledge, learning and development: a post-rationalist approach’, Progress in Development Studies, 6(4), pp. 287–305. doi: 10.1191/1464993406ps144oa.
Miessen, M. (2010) ‘Collaboration and the conflictual, Published in The nightmare of participation - p. 91-104’, in. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
Miraftab, F. (2004) ‘Making neo-liberal governance: the disempowering work of empowerment’, International Planning Studies, 9(4), pp. 239–259. doi: 10.1080/13563470500050130.
Miraftab, F. (2005) ‘Insurgency and Spaces of Active Citizenship: The Story of Western Cape Anti-eviction Campaign in South Africa’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(2), pp. 200–217. doi: 10.1177/0739456X05282182.
Mitlin, D. (2008) ‘With and beyond the state -- co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations’, Environment and Urbanization, 20(2), pp. 339–360. doi: 10.1177/0956247808096117.
Mitlin, D. and Bartlett, S. (2018) ‘Editorial: Co-production – key ideas’, Environment and Urbanization, 30(2), pp. 355–366. doi: 10.1177/0956247818791931.
Mitlin, D. and Satterthwaite, D. (2004) Empowering squatter citizen: local government, civil society and urban poverty reduction. London: Earthscan.
Mitlin, D. and Thompson, J. (1995) ‘Participatory approaches in urban areas: strengthening civil society or  reinforcing the status quo?’, Environment and Urbanization, 7(1), pp. 231–250. doi: 10.1177/095624789500700113.
Moser, C. O. N. (1989) ‘Community participation in urban projects in the Third World’, Progress in Planning, 32, pp. 71–133. doi: 10.1016/0305-9006(89)90010-X.
Mouffe, C. (2013) Agonistics: thinking the world politically. London: Verso.
Mukhija, V. (2014) ‘Urban Design for a Planet of Informal Cities’, in Companion to Urban Design. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203844434.ch43.
Patel, S. and Mitlin, D. (2004) ‘Grassroots-driven development: The alliance of SPARC, the National Slum Dwellers Federation and Mahila Milan’, in Empowering squatter citizen: local government, civil society and urban poverty reduction. London: Earthscan, pp. 216–241. Available at:
Petrescu, D. and Chiles, P. (2009) ‘Agency: alternative practices and alternative worlds’, Architectural Research Quarterly, 13(02). doi: 10.1017/S1359135509990194.
Petrescu, D. and Petcou, C. (2013) ‘Tactics for a Transgressive Practice’, Architectural Design, 83(6), pp. 58–65. doi: 10.1002/ad.1675.
Petrescu, D., Petcou, C. and Baibarac, C. (2016) ‘Co-producing commons-based resilience: lessons from R-Urban’, Building Research & Information, 44(7), pp. 717–736. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2016.1214891.
Plan , CRussel, B (2017) Radical municipalism: demanding the future | openDemocracy (no date). Available at:
‘Progress in Human Geography’ (no date). Available at:
Ramirez, R. (2010) ‘Integrated Informality in the Barrios of Havana’, in Rethinking the informal city: critical perspectives from Latin America. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 137–162. Available at:
Read, C. et al. (2014) ‘Applying a Practical, Participatory Action Research Framework for Producing Knowledge, Action and Change in Communities: A Health Case Study from Gujarat, Western India’, in Tiwari, R., Lommerse, M., and Smith, D. (eds) M2 Models and Methodologies for Community Engagement. Singapore: Springer Singapore, pp. 91–105. doi: 10.1007/978-981-4585-11-8_6.
Rendell, J. (2018) ‘Only resist: Five particular qualities might characterise a specifically feminist approach to critical spatial practice, suggests Jane Rendell.’, Architectural Review, 243(1449), pp. 8–18. Available at:,shib&db=asu&AN=128870014&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
Rios, M. (2008) ‘Envisioning Citizenship: Toward a Polity Approach in Urban Design’, Journal of Urban Design, 13(2), pp. 213–229. doi: 10.1080/13574800801965692.
Robinson, J. (1994) ‘White women researching/representing “others”: from antiapartheid to postcolonialism?’, in Writing women and space: colonial and postcolonial geographies. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 197–228.
Rolnik, R. (2014) ‘Place, inhabitance and citizenship: the right to housing and the right to the city in the contemporary urban world’, International Journal of Housing Policy, 14(3), pp. 293–300. doi: 10.1080/14616718.2014.936178.
Rose, G. (1997) ‘Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics’, Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), pp. 305–320. doi: 10.1191/030913297673302122.
Roy, A. (2009) ‘Civic Governmentality: The Politics of Inclusion in Beirut and Mumbai’, Antipode, 41(1), pp. 159–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00660.x.
Roy, A. (2016) ‘Who’s Afraid of Postcolonial Theory?’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1), pp. 200–209. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12274.
Saba Golchehr (no date) ‘Data-driven design for civic participation : Introducing digital methods for on-going civic engagement for design in public space’, pp. 56–70. doi: 10.4324/9781315110332-5.
Sandercock, L. (1998) Towards cosmopolis: planning for multicultural cities. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Sandercock, L. and Attili, G. (2010) ‘Digital Ethnography as Planning Praxis: An Experiment with Film as Social Research, Community Engagement and Policy Dialogue’, Planning Theory & Practice, 11(1), pp. 23–45. doi: 10.1080/14649350903538012.
Sanoff, H. (2014) ‘MULTIPLE VIEWS OF PARTICIPATORY DESIGN’, International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, 2(1), pp. 57–69. Available at:
SARA KINDON (no date) ‘Participatory Action Research: Origins, approaches and methods’, pp. 35–44. doi: 10.4324/9780203933671-13.
Sarkissian, W. and Bunjamin-Mau, W. et al. (2009) ‘Designing and managing a workshop’, in SpeakOut: the step-by-step guide to SpeakOuts and community workshops. London: Earthscan. Available at:
Schindler, S. (2017) ‘Towards a paradigm of Southern urbanism’, City, 21(1), pp. 47–64. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2016.1263494.
Schuermans, N. and Newton, C. (2012) ‘Being a young and foreign researcher in South Africa: Towards a postcolonial dialogue’, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 33(3), pp. 295–300. doi: 10.1111/sjtg.12005_4.
Seymour, W. (2007) ‘Exhuming the Body: Revisiting the Role of the Visible Body in Ethnographic Research’, Qualitative Health Research, 17(9), pp. 1188–1197. doi: 10.1177/1049732307308517.
Siemiatycki, M. (2012) ‘The Role of the Planning Scholar’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), pp. 147–159. doi: 10.1177/0739456X12440729.
De Souza, M. L. (2006) ‘Social movements as “critical urban planning” agents’, City, 10(3), pp. 327–342. doi: 10.1080/13604810600982347.
Sun, X. and Huang, R. (2018) ‘Spatial meaning-making and urban activism: Two tales of anti-PX protests in urban China’, Journal of Urban Affairs, pp. 1–21. doi: 10.1080/07352166.2018.1443010.
Sundberg, J. (2005) ‘Looking for the critical geographer, or why bodies and geographies matter to the emergence of critical geographies of Latin America’, Geoforum, 36(1), pp. 17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.03.006.
Swyngedouw, E. and Wilson, J. (2015) ‘Insurgent architects and the spectral return of the urban political’, in Metzger, J., Allmendinger, P., and Oosterlynck, S. (eds) Planning against the political: democratic deficits in European territorial governance. New York: Routledge, pp. 215–225. Available at:
Thomas Abbot (no date) ‘EMBRACE ABOLITIONIST PLANNING TO FIGHT TRUMPISM | Progressive City | International.’ Progressive City. Available at:
Till, J. (1998) ‘Architecture of the Impure Community’, in Hill, J. (ed.) Occupying architecture: between the architect and the user. London: Routledge, pp. 34–42. Available at:
Till, J. (2009) ‘Imperfect ethics’, in Architecture depends. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, pp. 171–187. Available at:
Turner, J. F. C. (1982) ‘Issues in Self-Help and Self-Managed Housing’, in Self-help housing: a critique. London: Mansell, pp. 99–113. Available at:
Umemoto, K. (2001) ‘Walking in Another’s Shoes’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(1), pp. 17–31. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0102100102.
‘View of Toward an Architecture of Dissensus: Participatory Urbanism in South-East Asia - Boano, C. and Kelling, E. (2013)’ (no date). Available at:
Wahby, N. (2017) ‘Institutions and Populism in the Global South-Lessons for the Brexit-Trump Era’, City & Community, 16(2), pp. 139–144. doi: 10.1111/cico.12234.
Wates, N. (2000) ‘General principles A-Z’, in Community planning handbook : how people can shape their cities, towns and villages in any part of the world. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, pp. 11–21.
Watson, V. (2006) ‘Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics’, Planning Theory, 5(1), pp. 31–50. doi: 10.1177/1473095206061020.
Watson, V. (2009) ‘Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues’, Urban Studies, 46(11), pp. 2259–2275. doi: 10.1177/0042098009342598.
‘We Drew What We Imagined: Participatory Mapping Performance, and Arts of Landscape Making, • Sletto, B. I., (2009)’ (no date). Available at:
Winkler, T. (2017) ‘Black texts on white paper: Learning to   resistant texts as an approach towards decolonising planning’, Planning Theory. doi: 10.1177/1473095217739335.
Yacobi, H. (2004) ‘Social Exclusion, Housing Environment and Tolerant Planning: The Case of the Jahelin Bedouin Tribe. Hagar - International Social Science Review. 69-84’, Hagar international social science review = Hājir, 5(1), pp. 69–83.
Yacobi, H. (2007) ‘The NGOization of Space: Dilemmas of Social Change, Planning Policy, and the Israeli Public Sphere’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(4), pp. 745–758. doi: 10.1068/d459t.
Yacobi, H., Ventura, J. and Danzig, S. (2016) ‘Walls, enclaves and the (counter) politics of design’, Journal of Urban Design, 21(4), pp. 481–494. doi: 10.1080/13574809.2016.1184566.
Zetter, R. (2002) ‘Market enablement or sustainable development : the conflicting paradigms of urbanization’, in Planning in cities: sustainability and growth in the developing world. London: ITDG, pp. 31–42. Available at: