[1]
An-Na’im, A.A. 1994. State Responsibility under International Human Rights Law to Change Religious and Customary Laws. Human rights of women: national and international perspectives. University of Pennsylvania Press. 167–188.
[2]
Anthias, F. et al. 1992. Racialized boundaries: race, nation, gender, colour and class and the anti-racist struggle. Routledge.
[3]
Araji, S.K. 2000. Crimes of Honour and Shame: Violence Against Women in Non-Western and Western Societies. The Red Feather Journal of Postmodern Criminology. (2000).
[4]
Aronowitz, A.A. 2013. Chapters 1 & 2. Human trafficking, human misery: the global trade in human beings. Scarecrow Press.
[5]
Askin, K.D. 2005. Gender Crimes Jurisprudence in the ICTR: Positive Developments. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 3, 4 (Aug. 2005), 1007–1018. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqi061.
[6]
Barlow, A. et al. 2002. Chapter 5: New Labour, the rationality mistake and family policy in Britain. Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. Routledge.
[7]
Barmes, L. 2003. The Diversity Approach to Achieving Equality: Potential and Pitfalls. Industrial Law Journal. 32, 4 (Dec. 2003), 274–296. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/32.4.274.
[8]
Bayefsky, A.F. 1994. General Approaches to Domestic Application of Women’s International Human Rights Law. Human rights of women: national and international perspectives. University of Pennsylvania Press. 351–374.
[9]
Beauvoir, Simone de et al. 2011. The second sex. Vintage.
[10]
Birgit Christensen and Andrew F. Smith 2005. Equality and Justice: Remarks on a Necessary Relationship. Hypatia. 20, 2 (2005), 155–163.
[11]
Brems, E. 2003. Protecting the Human Rights of Women. International human rights in the 21st century: protecting the rights of groups. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. 100–141.
[12]
Burrows, N. and Robison, M. 2007. An Assessment of the Recast of Community Equality Laws. European Law Journal. 13, 2 (Mar. 2007), 186–203. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00363.x.
[13]
Burrows, N. and Robison, M. 2006. *Positive Action for Women in Employment: Time to Align with Europe? Journal of Law and Society. 33, 1 (Mar. 2006), 24–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00345.x.
[14]
Butler, J. 2006. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
[15]
Byrnes, A. 2002. The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. The human rights of women: international instruments and African experiences. Zed Books in association with World University Service. 119–173.
[16]
Cameron, S. and Newman, E. 2008. Trafficking in humans: social, cultural and political dimensions. United Nations University Press.
[17]
Carol Smart 1991. * The Legal and Moral Ordering of Child Custody. Journal of Law and Society. 18, 4 (1991), 485–500.
[18]
Chandran, P. 2011. Human trafficking handbook: recognising trafficking and modern-day slavery in the UK. LexisNexis.
[19]
Charlesworth, H. 1994. What are "Women’s International Human Rights?”. Human rights of women: national and international perspectives. University of Pennsylvania Press. 58–85.
[20]
Charlesworth, Hilary and Chinkin, C. M. 2000. The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis. Manchester University Press.
[21]
Chesterman, Simon 1997. Never Again . . . and Again: Law, Order, and the Gender of War Crimes in Bosnia and Beyond. Yale Journal of International Law. 22, (1997).
[22]
Chinkin, C. 1994. Rape and Sexual Abuse of Women in International Law. European Journal of International Law. 5, 3 (1994), 326–341.
[23]
Christine A. Littleton 1987. Reconstructing Sexual Equality. California Law Review. 75, 4 (1987), 1279–1337.
[24]
Collier, R. 2001. *A Hard Time to Be a Father?: Reassessing the Relationship Between Law, Policy, and Family (Practices). Journal of Law and Society. 28, 4 (Dec. 2001), 520–545. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00201.
[25]
Conaghan, J. 2008. Intersectionality and the Feminist Project in Law. Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Location. Taylor and Francis.
[26]
Conaghan, J. 2009. Intersectionality and the Feminist Project in Law. Intersectionality and beyond. Routledge-Cavendish.
[27]
Coomaraswamy, R. 2005. Identity Within: Cultural Relativism, Minority Rights and the Empowerment of Women. Men’s laws, women’s lives: a constitutional perspective on religion, common law, and culture in South Asia. Women Unlimited.
[28]
Copelon, Rhonda 2000. Gender Crimes as War Crimes: Integrating Crimes against Women into International Criminal Law. McGill Law Journal. 46, (2000).
[29]
Cornell, Drucilla 1998. At the heart of freedom: feminism, sex, and equality. Princeton University Press.
[30]
Cornell, Drucilla 1998. At the heart of freedom: feminism, sex, and equality. Princeton University Press.
[31]
Cossman, B. 2002. Family Feuds: Neo-Liberal and Neo-Conservative Visions of the Re-Privatization Project. Privatization, law, and the challenge to feminism. University of Toronto Press. 169–217.
[32]
Court of Justice of The European Communities 2000. *Abrahamsson v Fogelqvist (407/98) [2000] ECR I-5539.
[33]
Court of Justice of the European Communities 2007. *Cadman v Health & Safety Executive (Equal Opportunities Commission intervening) (17/05) [2007] IRLR 969.
[34]
Court of Justice of The European Communities 1990. *Dekker (177/88) [1990] ECR I-3941.
[35]
Court of Justice of The European Communities 1993. *Enderby v Frenchay Health Authority (Case C-127/92) [1993] IRLR 591.
[36]
Court of Justice of the European Communities 1995. *Kalanke (450/93) [1995] ECR I-3051.
[37]
Court of Justice of The European Communities 2001. *Tele Danmark A/S (109/00) [2001] ECR I-6993.
[38]
Court of Justice of the European Communities (Second Chamber) 2004. *Briheche v Ministre de l’Intérieur (319/03) [2004] ECR I-8807.
[39]
Crenshaw, Kimberle 1989. *Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum. 1989, (1989).
[40]
Cusack, Simone 2013. CEDAW and the Rights to Non-Discrimination and Equality. Melbourne Journal of International Law. 14, (2013).
[41]
Davidoff, Leonore 1999. The family story: blood, contract and intimacy, 1830-1960. Longman.
[42]
Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte 2006. Who believes in human rights?: reflections on the European Convention. Cambridge University Press.
[43]
Deming, M.E. et al. 2013. Exploring Rape Myths, Gendered Norms, Group Processing, and the Social Context of Rape Among College Women: A Qualitative Analysis. Violence Against Women. 19, 4 (Apr. 2013), 465–485. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213487044.
[44]
Diduck, A. 2005. * Shifting Familiarity. Current Legal Problems. 58, (2005), 235–254.
[45]
Diduck, Alison and Kaganas, Felicity 2012. Chapter 1. Family law, gender and the state. Hart.
[46]
Doezema, J. 2010. Sex slaves and discourse masters: the construction of trafficking. Zed.
[47]
Employment Appeal Tribunal 1983. Watches of Switzerland v Savell [1983] IRLR 141.
[48]
European Court of Justice 1986. Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber Von Hartz (170/84) [1986] ECR 1607.
[49]
Fineman, Martha 2004. The autonomy myth: a theory of dependency. New Press.
[50]
Fredman, S. 2001. * Equality: A New Generation? Industrial Law Journal. 30, 2 (Jun. 2001), 145–168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/30.2.145.
[51]
Fredman, S. 2013. *The Role of Equality and Non-Discrimination Laws in Women’s Economic Participation, Formal and Informal. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.
[52]
Fredman, Sandra 2011. Discrimination law. Oxford University Press.
[53]
Freeman, Michael D. A. and Lloyd of Hampstead, Dennis Lloyd 2008. Chapter on Feminist Jurisprudence. Lloyd’s introduction to jurisprudence. Sweet & Maxwell.
[54]
Friedman, J. and Valenti, J. 2008. Chapter 1 & 2. Yes means yes!: visions of female sexual power & a world without rape. Seal Press.
[55]
Gallagher, A.T. 2010. The international law of human trafficking. Cambridge University Press.
[56]
Gilligan, C. 2003. In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.
[57]
Grimshaw et al., P. 2001. Chapter 3. Women’s rights and human rights: international historical perspectives. Palgrave.
[58]
Guild, E. and Minderhoud, P.E. 2006. Immigration and criminal law in the European Union: the legal measures and social consequences of criminal law in member states on trafficking and smuggling in human beings. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
[59]
Halley, Janet E. 2008. Split decisions: how and why to take a break from feminism. Princeton University Press.
[60]
Halley, Janet E. 2008. Split decisions: how and why to take a break from feminism. Princeton University Press.
[61]
Hilary Charlesworth, Christine Chinkin and Shelley Wright 1991. * Feminist Approaches to International Law. The American Journal of International Law. 85, 4 (1991), 613–645.
[62]
Holtmaat, R. 2013. *The CEDAW: A Holistic Approach to Women’s Equality and Freedom. Women’s human rights: CEDAW in international, regional, and national law. Cambridge University Press. 95–124.
[63]
Horvath, M. and Brown, J. 2013. Rape: challenging contemporary thinking. Routledge.
[64]
House of Lords 1990. *James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] ICR 554; [1990] IRLR 288; 2 AC 751; 3 WLR 55; 2 All ER 607, HL.
[65]
House of Lords 2006. R (Shabina Begum) v Denbigh High School Governors (HL) (2006) UKHL 15.
[66]
Hugh Collins 2003. * Discrimination, Equality and Social Inclusion. The Modern Law Review. 66, 1 (2003), 16–43.
[67]
Hunter, R. et al. 2010. *Chapter 1. Feminist Judgments: An Introduction. Feminist judgments: from theory to practice. Hart.
[68]
Hunter, R. 2010. *Chapter 2. An Account of Feminist Judging. Feminist judgments: from theory to practice. Hart.
[69]
Hunter, Rosemary C. 2008. * Chapter 1: Introduction: Feminism and Equality. Rethinking equality projects in law: feminist challenges. Hart Publishing.
[70]
Industrial Tribunal 1978. Price v Civil Service Commission [1978] IRLR 3.
[71]
Irigaray, Luce and Montin, Karin 1994. Thinking the difference: for a peaceful revolution. Athlone.
[72]
Ivana Radacic 2008. * Rape cases in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: defining rape and determining the scope of the state’s obligations. European Human Rights Law Review. 3 (2008), 357–375.
[73]
Jeffreys, S. 2009. Chapters 6 & 7. The industrial vagina: the political economy of the global sex trade. Routledge.
[74]
Jennifer C. Nash 2008. *re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review. 89 (2008), 1–15.
[75]
Jill Marshall 2008. * A right to personal autonomy at the European Court of Human Rights. European Human Rights Law Review. 3 (2008), 337–356.
[76]
Joanne Conaghan 2000. Reassessing the Feminist Theoretical Project in Law. Journal of Law and Society. 27, 3 (2000), 351–385.
[77]
KELLY, L. et al. 2005. A Gap or a Chasm? Attrition in Reported Rape Cases. Home Office.
[78]
Kempadoo, K. and Doezema, J. 1998. Global sex workers: rights, resistance, and redefinition. Routledge.
[79]
Kimberle Crenshaw 1991. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review. 43, 6 (1991), 1241–1299.
[80]
Lacey, N. 1998. * Chapter 1: From Individual to Group? A Feminist Analysis of the Limits of Anti-Discrimination Legislation. Unspeakable subjects: feminist essays in legal and social theory. Hart. 19–45.
[81]
Lacey, N. 2004. Feminist Legal Theory and The Rights of Women. Gender and human rights. Oxford University Press. 13–57.
[82]
Lacey, Nicola 1998. * Introduction to the Essays. Unspeakable subjects: feminist essays in legal and social theory. Hart.
[83]
Langlaude, S. 2006. *Indoctrination, Secularism, Religious Liberty, and the ECHR. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 55, 4 (Oct. 2006), 929–944. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei135.
[84]
Lees, S. 2002. Chapter 3. Carnal knowledge: rape on trial. Women’s Press.
[85]
Lewis, J. 2002. Chapter 3.1: Individualisation, assumptions about the existence of an adult worker model and the shift towards contractualism. Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. Routledge.
[86]
MacKinnon, C. 1989. Chapter 13: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press.
[87]
MacKinnon, C.A. 1989. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press.
[88]
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1987. * Chapter 2: Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination. Feminism unmodified: discourses on life and law. Harvard University Press.
[89]
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1989. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press.
[90]
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 2004. Women’s lives, men’s laws. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
[91]
Marshall, J. 2005. Chapter 7. Humanity, freedom and feminism. Ashgate.
[92]
Marshall, J. 2006. Freedom of Religious Expression and Gender Equality: Sahin v Turkey. Modern Law Review. 69, 3 (May 2006), 452–461. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00591_1.x.
[93]
Marshall, Jill 2008. *Conditions for Freedom - European Human Rights Law and the Islamic Headscarf Debate. Human Rights Quarterly. 30, 3 (2008), 631–654.
[94]
Marshall, Jill 2008. Conditions for Freedom - European Human Rights Law and the Islamic Headscarf Debate. Human Rights Quarterly. 30, 3 (2008).
[95]
Marshall, Jill 2005. Part 1. Humanity, freedom and feminism. Ashgate.
[96]
Masika, R. and Oxfam 2002. Gender, trafficking, and slavery. Oxfam.
[97]
Masselot, A. 2007. The State of Gender Equality Law in the European Union. European Law Journal. 13, 2 (Mar. 2007), 152–168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00361.x.
[98]
McCrudden, C. 1986. *Rethinking Positive Action. Industrial Law Journal. 15, 1 (1986), 219–243. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/15.1.219.
[99]
McGlynn, C. 2009. *RAPE, TORTURE AND THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 58, 03 (Jul. 2009). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589309001195.
[100]
McGlynn, Clare 2001. * Reclaiming a Feminist Vision: The Reconciliation of Paid Work and Family Life in European Union Law and Policy. Columbia Journal of European Law. 7, (2001).
[101]
McGregor, J. 2005. Is it rape?: on acquaintance rape and taking women’s consent seriously. Ashgate.
[102]
Mill, J.S. 1869. The subjection of women. Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer.
[103]
Moran, Leslie J. 2006. *Judicial Diversity and the Challenge of Sexuality: Some Preliminary Findings. Sydney Law Review. 28, 4 (2006).
[104]
Morris, E.G. 2009. Second class migrants?: gender and migration in the European Union : explaining gender (in)equality in EU immigration, asylum, and trafficking policymaking. VDM.
[105]
Mullally, S. 2004. Feminism and Multicultural Dilemmas in India: Revisiting the Shah Bano Case. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 24, 4 (Dec. 2004), 671–692. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/24.4.671.
[106]
Munro, V. 2007. * Chapter 1. Law and politics at the perimeter: re-evaluating key debates in feminist theory. Hart.
[107]
Munro, V. 2007. * Chapter 3: On Reform and Reforming Rights. Law and politics at the perimeter: re-evaluating key debates in feminist theory. Hart.
[108]
Munro, Vanessa 2007. * Chapter 6: Equality, Respect and feminist Futures. Law and politics at the perimeter: re-evaluating key debates in feminist theory. Hart.
[109]
Munro, V.E. 2005. Concerning Consent: Standards of Permissibility in Sexual Relations. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 25, 2 (Jun. 2005), 335–352. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi017.
[110]
Munsch, C.L. and Willer, R. 2012. The Role of Gender Identity Threat in Perceptions of Date Rape and Sexual Coercion. Violence Against Women. 18, 10 (Oct. 2012), 1125–1146. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801212465151.
[111]
Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth Redistribution or Recognition?. Verso.
[112]
Nedelsky, Jennifer 1993. * Reconceiving Rights as Relationship. Review of Constitutional Studies. 1, (1993).
[113]
Nicola Gavey Just Sex?. Routledge.
[114]
Nussbaum, Martha Craven 1999. * Chapters 1 and 2. Sex & social justice. Oxford University Press.
[115]
Okin, S.M. et al. 1999. Is multiculturalism bad for women?. Princeton University Press.
[116]
Okin, S.M. 1989. Justice, gender, and the family. Basic Books.
[117]
Okin, Susan Moller et al. 1999. Is multiculturalism bad for women?. Princeton University Press.
[118]
Olsen, F. 1993. * The Family and the Market: A Study of Ideology and Legal Reform. Feminist jurisprudence. Oxford University Press.
[119]
Paolo Ronchi 2011. A, B and C v Ireland: Europe’s Roe v Wade still has to wait. Law Quarterly Review. 127 (2011), 365–369.
[120]
Parekh, Bhikhu C. 2006. Conceptualising human beings. Rethinking multiculturalism: cultural diversity and political theory. Palgrave Macmillan.
[121]
Pateman, Carole 1988. The sexual contract. Polity.
[122]
Rackley, E. 2013. Women, judging and the judiciary: from difference to diversity. Routledge.
[123]
Radacic, I. 2008. * Gender Equality Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law. 19, 4 (Sep. 2008), 841–857. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn044.
[124]
Rao, A. 1995. The Politics of gender and culture in international human rights discourse. Women’s rights, human rights: international feminist perspectives. Routledge.
[125]
Reilly, N. 2009. Women’s human rights: seeking gender justice in a globalizing age. Polity.
[126]
Review by: Nicholas Bamforth 2004. * Conceptions of Anti-Discrimination Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 24, 4 (2004), 693–716.
[127]
Review by: Nicola Lacey 1989. Feminist Legal Theory. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 9, 3 (1989), 383–394.
[128]
Robin West 1988. Jurisprudence and Gender. The University of Chicago Law Review. 55, 1 (1988), 1–72.
[129]
Robson, R. 1998. Sappho goes to law school: fragments in lesbian legal theory. Columbia University Press.
[130]
Sandra Fredman 1994. * A difference with distinction: pregnancy and parenthood reassessed. Law Quarterly Review. 110, Jan (1994), 106–123.
[131]
Scales, A. 1993. The Emergence of Feminist Jurisprudence: An Essay. Feminist jurisprudence. Oxford University Press.
[132]
Shazia Choudhry and Jonathan Herring 2006. * Domestic violence and the Human Rights Act 1998: a new means of legal intervention? Public Law. Winter (2006), 752–784.
[133]
Shelley, L.I. 2010. Human trafficking: a global perspective. Cambridge University Press.
[134]
Siddiqui, H. 2005. ‘There is no “honour” in domestic violence, only shame!’ Women’s struggles against ‘honour’ crimes in the UK. ‘Honour’: crimes, paradigms, and violence against women. Zed Books.
[135]
Smart, C. 1989. * Chapters 1 and 7. Feminism and the power of law. Routledge.
[136]
Smart, C. 1989. Feminism and the power of law. Routledge.
[137]
Steiner, H.J. and Philip 2008. International human rights in context : law, politics, morals : text and materials.
[138]
Stychin, C. 2006. Chapter 2: Family Friendly? Rights, Responsibilities and Relationship Recognition. Feminist perspectives on family law. Routledge-Cavendish.
[139]
Temkin, J. 2002. Rape and the legal process. Oxford University Press.
[140]
Viseur Sellers, P. 2004. Individual(s) Liability for Collective Sexual Violence. Gender and human rights. Oxford University Press.
[141]
Volpp, L. 2001. Feminism versus Multiculturalism. Columbia Law Review. 101, 5 (Jun. 2001). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1123774.
[142]
Walsh, D.M. 2011. Women’s rights in democratizing states: just debate and gender justice in the public sphere. Cambridge University Press.
[143]
Williams, Patricia J. 1991. The alchemy of race and rights. Harvard University Press.
[144]
Women’s Link Worldwide - Women’s Link’s Gender Justice Observatory: http://www.womenslinkworldwide.org/observatory/.
[145]
Yoshida, K. 2013. Towards Intersectionality in the European Court of Human Rights: The Case of B.S. v Spain. Feminist Legal Studies. 21, 2 (Jul. 2013), 195–204. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-013-9241-1.
[146]
Young, Iris Marion 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.
[147]
Young, Iris Marion 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.
[148]
Yuval-Davis, N. 2006. Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 13, 3 (Aug. 2006), 193–209. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752.
[149]
2010. *A, B and C v Ireland. European Court of Human Rights.
[150]
1985. *Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom. European Court of Human Rights.
[151]
2012. Article 19 TFEU (ex Article 13 EC). European Union.
[152]
2012. Article 157 Treaty on the Foundation of the EU (TFEU), formerly Article 141 of the EC Treaty. European Union.
[153]
2000. Badeck (158/97) [2000] ECR I-1875.
[154]
2004. *Bahl v The Law Society & Anor [2004] EWCA Civ 1070.
[155]
1977. *Brüggemann and Scheuten v The Federal Republic of Germany. European Court of Human Rights.
[156]
1998. Case C-249/96, Grant v. South-west Trains Ltd. [1998] ECR I-621. European Union.
[157]
2010. CASE OF RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA. European Court of Human Rights.
[159]
2006. *D v Ireland. European Court of Human Rights.
[160]
2001. Dahlab v Switzerland (Application No. 42393/98, ECHR 2001-V).
[161]
1976. Defrenne v Sabena (No 2) (1976) C-43/75. European Union.
[162]
1975. Directive 75/117 EC. European Union.
[163]
1976. Directive 76/207/EEC. European Union.
[164]
Directive 92/85 Pregnant Workers Directive.
[165]
Directive 97/81 Part Time Work Directive.
[166]
2000. Directive 2000/43/EC. European Union.
[167]
2000. Directive 2000/78/EC. European Union.
[168]
2002. Directive 2002/73/EC. European Union.
[169]
2004. Directive 2004/113/EC. European Union.
[170]
2006. Directive 2006/54/EC. European Union.
[171]
Directive 2010/18 Parental Leave Directive.
[172]
2010. Equality Act 2010.
[173]
2000. EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. European Union.
[174]
2004. General Recommendation No. 25, on article 4, paragraph 1, of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, on temporary special measures, Paras 6and 7. United Nations.
[175]
2001. General Recommendation No. 28, on the core obligations of States parties under article 2 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. United Nations.
[176]
1993. Karaduman v Turkey (Application No. 16278/90), 74 Eur. Comm’n. H.R. Dec. & Rep. 93 (1993).
[177]
2004. Law No 2004-228 of March 15, 2004, JO March 17 2004 p 5190 JCP 2004.
[178]
2005. *Leyla Sahin v Turkey. European Court of Human Rights.
[179]
2002. *Lommers (476/99) [2002] ECR I-2891.
[180]
1998. London Underground v Edwards (No 2) [1999] I.C.R. 494. *494 London Underground Ltd. v Edwards (No. 2).
[181]
1997. *Marschall v Land Nordrhein Westfalen (409/95) [1997] ECR I-6363.
[182]
1986. Porcelli v Strathclyde [1986] ICR 564.
[183]
1989. *R v Birmingham CC ex parte EOC [1989] IRLR 173; [1989] AC 1155; 2 WLR 520; 1 All ER 769, HL. *1155 Birmingham City Council Appellants v Equal Opportunities Commission Respondents.
[184]
1999. *R v Secretary of State for Employment ex parte Seymour-Smith and Perez (167/97) [1999] ECR I-623.
[185]
2011. *Roca Álvarez v Sesa Start España ETT SA (104/09) [2011] 1 CMLR 28.
[186]
2005. Sahin v Turkey (Application No. 44774/98).
[187]
2006. *Stec and others v. the United Kingdom. European Court of Human Rights.
[188]
2007. *Tysiac v Poland. European Court of Human Rights.
[189]
2004. *Vo v France. European Court of Human Rights.
[190]
1994. *Webb v EMO (32/93) [1994] ECR I-3567.
