2
Lacey, Nicola. * Introduction to the Essays. In: Unspeakable subjects: feminist essays in legal and social theory. Oxford: : Hart 1998. doi:10.5040/9781472561916
3
Munro V. * Chapter 1. In: Law and politics at the perimeter: re-evaluating key debates in feminist theory. Oxford: : Hart 2007.
4
Joanne Conaghan. Reassessing the Feminist Theoretical Project in Law. Journal of Law and Society 2000;27:351–85.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1410380
5
Review by: Nicola Lacey. Feminist Legal Theory. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1989;9:383–94.http://www.jstor.org/stable/764424
6
MacKinnon C. Chapter 13: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence. In: Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1989.
7
Freeman, Michael D. A., Lloyd of Hampstead, Dennis Lloyd. Chapter on Feminist Jurisprudence. In: Lloyd’s introduction to jurisprudence. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2008.
8
Scales A. The Emergence of Feminist Jurisprudence: An Essay. In: Feminist jurisprudence. New York: : Oxford University Press 1993.
9
Halley, Janet E. Split decisions: how and why to take a break from feminism. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2008.
10
Marshall, Jill. Part 1. In: Humanity, freedom and feminism. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2005.
11
Munro, Vanessa. * Chapter 6: Equality, Respect and feminist Futures. In: Law and politics at the perimeter: re-evaluating key debates in feminist theory. Oxford: : Hart 2007.
12
MacKinnon, Catharine A. * Chapter 2: Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination. In: Feminism unmodified: discourses on life and law. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1987.
13
Hunter, Rosemary C. * Chapter 1: Introduction: Feminism and Equality. In: Rethinking equality projects in law: feminist challenges. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2008. https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/rethinking-equality-projects-in-law-feminist-challenges/
14
Birgit Christensen and Andrew F. Smith. Equality and Justice: Remarks on a Necessary Relationship. Hypatia 2005;20:155–63.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3811169
15
Christine A. Littleton. Reconstructing Sexual Equality. California Law Review 1987;75:1279–337.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3480595
16
Cornell, Drucilla. At the heart of freedom: feminism, sex, and equality. Princton, N.J: : Princeton University Press 1998.
17
Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, N.J: : Princeton University Press 1990.
18
Crenshaw, Kimberle. *Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989;1989.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf1989&id=143&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf
19
Jennifer C. Nash. *re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review 2008;:1–15.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40663957
20
Kimberle Crenshaw. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review 1991;43:1241–99.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039
21
Yuval-Davis N. Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies 2006;13:193–209. doi:10.1177/1350506806065752
22
Yoshida K. Towards Intersectionality in the European Court of Human Rights: The Case of B.S. v Spain. Feminist Legal Studies 2013;21:195–204. doi:10.1007/s10691-013-9241-1
23
Conaghan J. Intersectionality and the Feminist Project in Law. In: Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Location. Hoboken: : Taylor and Francis 2008. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=355908
24
Conaghan J. Intersectionality and the Feminist Project in Law. In: Intersectionality and beyond. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge-Cavendish 2009. https://kar.kent.ac.uk/1900/1/Intersectionality_Feminist_Project15NOV07DP.pdf
25
Munro V. * Chapter 3: On Reform and Reforming Rights. In: Law and politics at the perimeter: re-evaluating key debates in feminist theory. Oxford: : Hart 2007.
26
Nedelsky, Jennifer. * Reconceiving Rights as Relationship. Review of Constitutional Studies 1993;1.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/revicos1&id=3&collection=journals&index=journals/revicos#3
27
Nussbaum, Martha Craven. * Chapters 1 and 2. In: Sex & social justice. New York: : Oxford University Press 1999.
28
Lacey N. * Chapter 1: From Individual to Group? A Feminist Analysis of the Limits of Anti-Discrimination Legislation. In: Unspeakable subjects: feminist essays in legal and social theory. Oxford: : Hart 1998. 19–45. doi:10.5040/9781472561916.ch-001
29
Smart C. * Chapters 1 and 7. In: Feminism and the power of law. London: : Routledge 1989. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203206164
30
MacKinnon, Catharine A. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1989.
31
MacKinnon, Catharine A. Women’s lives, men’s laws. Cambridge, Mass: : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2004. doi:10.2307/j.ctv1pdrpw3?locatt=mode:legacy
32
Gilligan C. In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. 38th print. Cambridge, Massachusetts: : Harvard University Press 2003. doi:10.2307/j.ctvjk2wr9?locatt=mode:legacy
33
Irigaray, Luce, Montin, Karin. Thinking the difference: for a peaceful revolution. London: : Athlone 1994.
34
Pateman, Carole. The sexual contract. Cambridge: : Polity 1988.
35
Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, N.J: : Princeton University Press 1990.
36
Cornell, Drucilla. At the heart of freedom: feminism, sex, and equality. Princton, N.J: : Princeton University Press 1998.
37
Robin West. Jurisprudence and Gender. The University of Chicago Law Review 1988;55:1–72.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1599769
38
Beauvoir, Simone de, Borde, Constance, Malovany-Chevallier, Sheila. The second sex. New York: : Vintage 2011.
39
Williams, Patricia J. The alchemy of race and rights. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1991.
40
Halley, Janet E. Split decisions: how and why to take a break from feminism. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2008.
41
Smart C. Feminism and the power of law. London: : Routledge 1989. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134972838
42
Anthias F, Yuval-Davis N, Cain H. Racialized boundaries: race, nation, gender, colour and class and the anti-racist struggle. London: : Routledge 1992. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203992920
43
Robson R. Sappho goes to law school: fragments in lesbian legal theory. New York: : Columbia University Press 1998.
44
Okin SM. Justice, gender, and the family. New York: : Basic Books 1989.
45
Mill JS. The subjection of women. London: : Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer 1869. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=N&PAGE=toc&SEARCH=2008-18239.dd&LINKTYPE=asBody&D=psbk
46
Butler J. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. 2nd ed. New York: : Routledge 2006. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203824979
47
Nancy Fraser, Axel Honneth. Redistribution or Recognition? Verso
48
Moran, Leslie J. *Judicial Diversity and the Challenge of Sexuality: Some Preliminary Findings. Sydney Law Review 2006;28.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/sydney28&id=559&collection=journals&index=
49
Hunter R, McGlynn C, Rackley E. *Chapter 1. Feminist Judgments: An Introduction. In: Feminist judgments: from theory to practice. Oxford: : Hart 2010. https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/feminist-judgments-from-theory-to-practice/
50
Hunter R. *Chapter 2. An Account of Feminist Judging. In: Feminist judgments: from theory to practice. Oxford: : Hart 2010. https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/feminist-judgments-from-theory-to-practice/
51
Rackley E. Women, judging and the judiciary: from difference to diversity. Abingdon: : Routledge 2013.
52
Diduck A. * Shifting Familiarity. Current Legal Problems 2005;58:235–54.http://clp.oxfordjournals.org/content/58/1.toc
53
Olsen F. * The Family and the Market: A Study of Ideology and Legal Reform. In: Feminist jurisprudence. New York: : Oxford University Press 1993.
54
Carol Smart. * The Legal and Moral Ordering of Child Custody. Journal of Law and Society 1991;18:485–500.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1410322
55
Collier R. *A Hard Time to Be a Father?: Reassessing the Relationship Between Law, Policy, and Family (Practices). Journal of Law and Society 2001;28:520–45. doi:10.1111/1467-6478.00201
56
Stychin C. Chapter 2: Family Friendly? Rights, Responsibilities and Relationship Recognition. In: Feminist perspectives on family law. Abingdon: : Routledge-Cavendish 2006.
57
Diduck, Alison, Kaganas, Felicity. Chapter 1. In: Family law, gender and the state. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
58
Cossman B. Family Feuds: Neo-Liberal and Neo-Conservative Visions of the Re-Privatization Project. In: Privatization, law, and the challenge to feminism. Toronto: : University of Toronto Press 2002. 169–217.https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/9781442678774.9
59
Fineman, Martha. The autonomy myth: a theory of dependency. New York: : New Press 2004.
60
Davidoff, Leonore. The family story: blood, contract and intimacy, 1830-1960. London: : Longman 1999.
61
Barlow A, Duncan S, Edwards R. Chapter 5: New Labour, the rationality mistake and family policy in Britain. In: Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. London: : Routledge 2002.
62
Lewis J. Chapter 3.1: Individualisation, assumptions about the existence of an adult worker model and the shift towards contractualism. In: Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. London: : Routledge 2002.
63
Lees S. Chapter 3. In: Carnal knowledge: rape on trial. London: : Women’s Press 2002.
64
Friedman J, Valenti J. Chapter 1 & 2. In: Yes means yes!: visions of female sexual power & a world without rape. Berkeley, Calif: : Seal Press 2008.
65
MacKinnon CA. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1989.
66
Deming ME, Covan EK, Swan SC, et al. Exploring Rape Myths, Gendered Norms, Group Processing, and the Social Context of Rape Among College Women: A Qualitative Analysis. Violence Against Women 2013;19:465–85. doi:10.1177/1077801213487044
67
Horvath M, Brown J. Rape: challenging contemporary thinking. London: : Routledge 2013.
68
Munro VE. Concerning Consent: Standards of Permissibility in Sexual Relations. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2005;25:335–52. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqi017
69
KELLY L, LOVETT J, REGAN L. A Gap or a Chasm? Attrition in Reported Rape Cases. 2005.http://www.apho.org.uk/resource/item.aspx?RID=78107
70
Temkin J. Rape and the legal process. 2nd ed. New York: : Oxford University Press 2002.
71
Nicola Gavey. Just Sex? Routledge
72
McGregor J. Is it rape?: on acquaintance rape and taking women’s consent seriously. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2005.
73
Munsch CL, Willer R. The Role of Gender Identity Threat in Perceptions of Date Rape and Sexual Coercion. Violence Against Women 2012;18:1125–46. doi:10.1177/1077801212465151
74
Aronowitz AA. Chapters 1 & 2. In: Human trafficking, human misery: the global trade in human beings. Lanham, Maryland: : Scarecrow Press 2013.
75
Masika R, Oxfam. Gender, trafficking, and slavery. Oxford: : Oxfam 2002.
76
Kempadoo K, Doezema J. Global sex workers: rights, resistance, and redefinition. New York: : Routledge 1998. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0651/97045759-d.html
77
Jeffreys S. Chapters 6 & 7. In: The industrial vagina: the political economy of the global sex trade. London: : Routledge 2009.
78
CASE OF RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA. 2010.http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-96549#{"itemid":["001-96549"]}
79
Cameron S, Newman E. Trafficking in humans: social, cultural and political dimensions. Tokyo: : United Nations University Press 2008.
80
Chandran P. Human trafficking handbook: recognising trafficking and modern-day slavery in the UK. London: : LexisNexis 2011.
81
Doezema J. Sex slaves and discourse masters: the construction of trafficking. London: : Zed 2010.
82
Gallagher AT. The international law of human trafficking. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511761065
83
Guild E, Minderhoud PE. Immigration and criminal law in the European Union: the legal measures and social consequences of criminal law in member states on trafficking and smuggling in human beings. Leiden: : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2006. doi:10.1163/ej.9789004150645.i-425
84
Morris EG. Second class migrants?: gender and migration in the European Union : explaining gender (in)equality in EU immigration, asylum, and trafficking policymaking. Saarbrücken: : VDM 2009.
85
Shelley LI. Human trafficking: a global perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511760433
86
Holtmaat R. *The CEDAW: A Holistic Approach to Women’s Equality and Freedom. In: Women’s human rights: CEDAW in international, regional, and national law. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. 95–124.https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/womens-human-rights/cedaw/F0BA5E99167E804E5A8541E37003637F
87
Fredman S. *The Role of Equality and Non-Discrimination Laws in Women’s Economic Participation, Formal and Informal. 2013.http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Women/WGWomen/Pages/ESL.aspx
88
Lacey N. Feminist Legal Theory and The Rights of Women. In: Gender and human rights. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2004. 13–57.https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma990016212650204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=title,contains,Gender%20and%20Human%20Rights,AND&query=creator,contains,knop,AND&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9081303978816451051&mode=advanced&offset=0
89
Byrnes A. The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. In: The human rights of women: international instruments and African experiences. London: : Zed Books in association with World University Service 2002. 119–73.
90
Walsh DM. Women’s rights in democratizing states: just debate and gender justice in the public sphere. New York: : Cambridge University Press 2011. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511782220
91
Brems E. Protecting the Human Rights of Women. In: International human rights in the 21st century: protecting the rights of groups. Lanham: : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2003. 100–41.
92
Charlesworth H. What are "Women’s International Human Rights?”. In: Human rights of women: national and international perspectives. Philadelphia: : University of Pennsylvania Press 1994. 58–85.https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt3fhxkd.7
93
Reilly N. Women’s human rights: seeking gender justice in a globalizing age. Cambridge: : Polity 2009.
94
Grimshaw et al. P. Chapter 3. In: Women’s rights and human rights: international historical perspectives. Basingstoke: : Palgrave 2001.
95
Cusack, Simone. CEDAW and the Rights to Non-Discrimination and Equality. Melbourne Journal of International Law 2013;14.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/meljil14&id=64&collection=journals&index=
96
General Recommendation No. 25, on article 4, paragraph 1, of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, on temporary special measures, Paras 6and 7. 2004.http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/recommendations/
97
General Recommendation No. 28, on the core obligations of States parties under article 2 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. 2001.http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/comments.htm
98
Hilary Charlesworth, Christine Chinkin and Shelley Wright. * Feminist Approaches to International Law. The American Journal of International Law 1991;85:613–45.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2203269
99
Radacic I. * Gender Equality Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law 2008;19:841–57. doi:10.1093/ejil/chn044
100
*Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom. 1985.http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-57416#{"itemid":["001-57416"]}
101
*Stec and others v. the United Kingdom. 2006.http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-73198#{"itemid":["001-73198"]}
102
*Leyla Sahin v Turkey. 2005.http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-70956#{"itemid":["001-70956"]}
103
Marshall, Jill. *Conditions for Freedom - European Human Rights Law and the Islamic Headscarf Debate. Human Rights Quarterly 2008;30:631–54.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20072862
104
Langlaude S. *Indoctrination, Secularism, Religious Liberty, and the ECHR. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 2006;55:929–44. doi:10.1093/iclq/lei135
105
McGlynn C. *RAPE, TORTURE AND THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 2009;58. doi:10.1017/S0020589309001195
106
Ivana Radacic. * Rape cases in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: defining rape and determining the scope of the state’s obligations. European Human Rights Law Review 2008;:357–75.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF811B810253811DD86CC82E94475513A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
107
Shazia Choudhry and Jonathan Herring. * Domestic violence and the Human Rights Act 1998: a new means of legal intervention? Public Law 2006;:752–84.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I1357EA60540511DB85F29853495F842F/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
108
Jill Marshall. * A right to personal autonomy at the European Court of Human Rights. European Human Rights Law Review 2008;:337–56.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF8119100253811DD86CC82E94475513A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
109
*Brüggemann and Scheuten v The Federal Republic of Germany. 1977.http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-74824#{"itemid":["001-74824"]}
110
*Vo v France. 2004.http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-61887#{"itemid":["001-61887"]}
111
*Tysiac v Poland. 2007.http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-79812#{"itemid":["001-79812"]}
112
*D v Ireland. 2006.http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-76233#{"itemid":["001-76233"]}
113
*A, B and C v Ireland. 2010.http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-102332#{"itemid":["001-102332"]}
114
Paolo Ronchi. A, B and C v Ireland: Europe’s Roe v Wade still has to wait. Law Quarterly Review 2011;:365–9.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I3C0F90D09A2711E09D29F4D8A5F97F11/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
115
Charlesworth, Hilary, Chinkin, C. M. The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 2000.
116
Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte. Who believes in human rights?: reflections on the European Convention. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618192
117
Women’s Link Worldwide - Women’s Link’s Gender Justice Observatory. http://www.womenslinkworldwide.org/observatory/
118
Hugh Collins. * Discrimination, Equality and Social Inclusion. The Modern Law Review 2003;66:16–43.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097547
119
Review by: Nicholas Bamforth. * Conceptions of Anti-Discrimination Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2004;24:693–716.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3600533
120
Fredman S. * Equality: A New Generation? Industrial Law Journal 2001;30:145–68. doi:10.1093/ilj/30.2.145
121
Fredman, Sandra. Discrimination law. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.
122
Article 157 Treaty on the Foundation of the EU (TFEU), formerly Article 141 of the EC Treaty. 2012.http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT
123
Directive 75/117 EC. 1975.http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/employment_and_social_policy/employment_rights_and_work_organisation/c10905_en.htm
124
Defrenne v Sabena (No 2) (1976) C-43/75. 1976.http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61975CJ0043
125
Directive 76/207/EEC. 1976.http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:31976L0207&qid=1418055475418&from=EN
126
Directive 2002/73/EC. 2002.http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32002L0073&rid=1
127
Directive 2006/54/EC. 2006.http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32006L0054&from=EN
128
Directive 2004/113/EC. 2004.http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:373:0037:0043:EN:PDF
129
Article 19 TFEU (ex Article 13 EC). 2012.http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT
130
Directive 2000/43/EC. 2000.http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32000L0043&from=EN
131
Directive 2000/78/EC. 2000.http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2000:303:0016:0022:EN:PDF
132
EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. 2000.http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/charter/index_en.htm
133
Burrows N, Robison M. An Assessment of the Recast of Community Equality Laws. European Law Journal 2007;13:186–203. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00363.x
134
Masselot A. The State of Gender Equality Law in the European Union. European Law Journal 2007;13:152–68. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00361.x
135
Equality Act 2010. 2010.http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents
136
Case C-249/96, Grant v. South-west Trains Ltd. [1998] ECR I-621. 1998.http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:61996CJ0249&from=EN
137
Porcelli v Strathclyde [1986] ICR 564. 1986. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I23B4B0C0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
138
*Bahl v The Law Society & Anor [2004] EWCA Civ 1070. 2004.http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/1070.html
139
*R v Birmingham CC ex parte EOC [1989] IRLR 173; [1989] AC 1155; 2 WLR 520; 1 All ER 769, HL. *1155 Birmingham City Council Appellants v Equal Opportunities Commission Respondents. 1989.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I33C34170E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
140
House of Lords. *James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] ICR 554; [1990] IRLR 288; 2 AC 751; 3 WLR 55; 2 All ER 607, HL. 1990. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICBD48150E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
141
Industrial Tribunal. Price v Civil Service Commission [1978] IRLR 3. 1978. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I81C21C80E43611DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
142
Employment Appeal Tribunal. Watches of Switzerland v Savell [1983] IRLR 141. 1983. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA8E35A90E43611DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
143
London Underground v Edwards (No 2) [1999] I.C.R. 494. *494 London Underground Ltd. v Edwards (No. 2). 1998.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE309AAD0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
144
European Court of Justice. Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber Von Hartz (170/84) [1986] ECR 1607. 1986. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I748F3250E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
145
Court of Justice of The European Communities. *Enderby v Frenchay Health Authority (Case C-127/92) [1993] IRLR 591. 1993. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA1777930E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
146
*R v Secretary of State for Employment ex parte Seymour-Smith and Perez (167/97) [1999] ECR I-623. 1999. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I653D1E60E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
147
Court of Justice of the European Communities. *Cadman v Health & Safety Executive (Equal Opportunities Commission intervening) (17/05) [2007] IRLR 969. 2007. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I709A06E0880811DB92B1C1B25B24F692/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
148
McGlynn, Clare. * Reclaiming a Feminist Vision: The Reconciliation of Paid Work and Family Life in European Union Law and Policy. Columbia Journal of European Law 2001;7.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/coljeul7&id=247&collection=journals&index=journals/coljeul#247
149
Sandra Fredman. * A difference with distinction: pregnancy and parenthood reassessed. Law Quarterly Review 1994;110:106–23.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICCF9F040E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
150
Court of Justice of The European Communities. *Dekker (177/88) [1990] ECR I-3941. 1990. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I9639D180E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
151
*Webb v EMO (32/93) [1994] ECR I-3567. 1994.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF733C1C0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
152
Court of Justice of The European Communities. *Tele Danmark A/S (109/00) [2001] ECR I-6993. 2001. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICE7BB710E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
153
Directive 92/85 Pregnant Workers Directive. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31992L0085:EN:HTML
154
Directive 2010/18 Parental Leave Directive. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:068:0013:0020:EN:PDF
155
Directive 97/81 Part Time Work Directive. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31997L0081:EN:HTML
156
McCrudden C. *Rethinking Positive Action. Industrial Law Journal 1986;15:219–43. doi:10.1093/ilj/15.1.219
157
Barmes L. The Diversity Approach to Achieving Equality: Potential and Pitfalls. Industrial Law Journal 2003;32:274–96. doi:10.1093/ilj/32.4.274
158
Burrows N, Robison M. *Positive Action for Women in Employment: Time to Align with Europe? Journal of Law and Society 2006;33:24–41. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00345.x
159
Court of Justice of the European Communities. *Kalanke (450/93) [1995] ECR I-3051. 1995. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID1747A20E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
160
*Marschall v Land Nordrhein Westfalen (409/95) [1997] ECR I-6363. 1997.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IEEF9D9A0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
161
Badeck (158/97) [2000] ECR I-1875. 2000. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I6D798971E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
162
Court of Justice of The European Communities. *Abrahamsson v Fogelqvist (407/98) [2000] ECR I-5539. 2000. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I47B76630E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
163
*Lommers (476/99) [2002] ECR I-2891. 2002.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IE26FDBD0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
164
Court of Justice of the European Communities (Second Chamber). *Briheche v Ministre de l’Intérieur (319/03) [2004] ECR I-8807. 2004. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I7A7E3580E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
165
*Roca Álvarez v Sesa Start España ETT SA (104/09) [2011] 1 CMLR 28. 2011. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I6465D470EC7811DF9E738AE5417A83F5/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
166
Volpp L. Feminism versus Multiculturalism. Columbia Law Review 2001;101. doi:10.2307/1123774
167
Marshall, Jill. Conditions for Freedom - European Human Rights Law and the Islamic Headscarf Debate. Human Rights Quarterly 2008;30.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20072862
168
Steiner HJ, Philip. International human rights in context : law, politics, morals : text and materials. 2008. http://encore.ulrls.lon.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2991414__SInternational%2520Human%2520Rights%2520in%2520Context%253A%2520law%252C%2520politics%252C%2520morals__Ff%253Afacetlocations%253Aull%253Aull%253ASENATE%2520HOUSE%2520LIBRARY%253A%253A__Orightresult__X4?lang=eng&suite=cobalt
169
Rao A. The Politics of gender and culture in international human rights discourse. In: Women’s rights, human rights: international feminist perspectives. New York: : Routledge 1995.
170
Marshall J. Freedom of Religious Expression and Gender Equality: Sahin v Turkey. Modern Law Review 2006;69:452–61. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00591_1.x
171
Okin, Susan Moller, Cohen, Joshua, Howard, Matthew, et al. Is multiculturalism bad for women? Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1999. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7sxzs
172
Bayefsky AF. General Approaches to Domestic Application of Women’s International Human Rights Law. In: Human rights of women: national and international perspectives. Philadelphia: : University of Pennsylvania Press 1994. 351–74.https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt3fhxkd.19
173
Parekh, Bhikhu C. Conceptualising human beings. In: Rethinking multiculturalism: cultural diversity and political theory. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2006. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14687495240004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
174
Karaduman v Turkey (Application No. 16278/90), 74 Eur. Comm’n. H.R. Dec. & Rep. 93 (1993). 1993.http://www.strasbourgconsortium.org/common/document.view.php?DocumentID=4237
175
Dahlab v Switzerland (Application No. 42393/98, ECHR 2001-V). 2001.http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-22643#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-22643%22]}
176
Sahin v Turkey (Application No. 44774/98). 2005.http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-70956#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-70956%22]}
177
House of Lords. R (Shabina Begum) v Denbigh High School Governors (HL) (2006) UKHL 15. 2006. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=ICEDAD020F83611DAB97BB67935546CF2&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
178
Law No 2004-228 of March 15, 2004, JO March 17 2004 p 5190 JCP 2004. 2004.http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000417977&dateTexte=&categorieLien=id
179
Araji SK. Crimes of Honour and Shame: Violence Against Women in Non-Western and Western Societies. The Red Feather Journal of Postmodern Criminology Published Online First: 2000.http://www.critcrim.org/redfeather/journal-pomocrim/vol-8-shaming/araji.html
180
Okin SM, Cohen J, Howard M, et al. Is multiculturalism bad for women? Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1999. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7sxzs
181
Coomaraswamy R. Identity Within: Cultural Relativism, Minority Rights and the Empowerment of Women. In: Men’s laws, women’s lives: a constitutional perspective on religion, common law, and culture in South Asia. New Delhi: : Women Unlimited 2005.
182
Mullally S. Feminism and Multicultural Dilemmas in India: Revisiting the Shah Bano Case. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2004;24:671–92. doi:10.1093/ojls/24.4.671
183
Siddiqui H. ‘There is no “honour” in domestic violence, only shame!’ Women’s struggles against ‘honour’ crimes in the UK. In: ‘Honour’: crimes, paradigms, and violence against women. London: : Zed Books 2005.
184
An-Na’im AA. State Responsibility under International Human Rights Law to Change Religious and Customary Laws. In: Human rights of women: national and international perspectives. Philadelphia: : University of Pennsylvania Press 1994. 167–88.https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt3fhxkd.11
185
Marshall J. Chapter 7. In: Humanity, freedom and feminism. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2005.
186
Copelon, Rhonda. Gender Crimes as War Crimes: Integrating Crimes against Women into International Criminal Law. McGill Law Journal 2000;46.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mcgil46&id=227&collection=journals&index=
187
Viseur Sellers P. Individual(s) Liability for Collective Sexual Violence. In: Gender and human rights. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199260911.001.0001
188
Askin KD. Gender Crimes Jurisprudence in the ICTR: Positive Developments. Journal of International Criminal Justice 2005;3:1007–18. doi:10.1093/jicj/mqi061
189
Chinkin C. Rape and Sexual Abuse of Women in International Law. European Journal of International Law 1994;5:326–41.http://ejil.oxfordjournals.org/content/5/1/326.citation
190
Chesterman, Simon. Never Again . . . and Again: Law, Order, and the Gender of War Crimes in Bosnia and Beyond. Yale Journal of International Law 1997;22.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjil22&id=309&collection=journals&index=
