2
Lacey, Nicola. * Introduction to the Essays. Unspeakable subjects: feminist essays in legal and social theory. Oxford: Hart 1998.
3
Munro V. * Chapter 1. Law and politics at the perimeter: re-evaluating key debates in feminist theory. Oxford: Hart 2007.
4
Joanne Conaghan. Reassessing the Feminist Theoretical Project in Law. Journal of Law and Society. 2000;27:351–85.
5
Review by: Nicola Lacey. Feminist Legal Theory. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 1989;9:383–94.
6
MacKinnon C. Chapter 13: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 1989.
7
Freeman, Michael D. A., Lloyd of Hampstead, Dennis Lloyd. Chapter on Feminist Jurisprudence. Lloyd’s introduction to jurisprudence. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2008.
8
Scales A. The Emergence of Feminist Jurisprudence: An Essay. Feminist jurisprudence. New York: Oxford University Press 1993.
9
Halley, Janet E. Split decisions: how and why to take a break from feminism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2008.
10
Marshall, Jill. Part 1. Humanity, freedom and feminism. Aldershot: Ashgate 2005.
11
Munro, Vanessa. * Chapter 6: Equality, Respect and feminist Futures. Law and politics at the perimeter: re-evaluating key debates in feminist theory. Oxford: Hart 2007.
12
MacKinnon, Catharine A. * Chapter 2: Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination. Feminism unmodified: discourses on life and law. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 1987.
13
Hunter, Rosemary C. * Chapter 1: Introduction: Feminism and Equality. Rethinking equality projects in law: feminist challenges. Oxford: Hart Publishing 2008.
14
Birgit Christensen and Andrew F. Smith. Equality and Justice: Remarks on a Necessary Relationship. Hypatia. 2005;20:155–63.
15
Christine A. Littleton. Reconstructing Sexual Equality. California Law Review. 1987;75:1279–337.
16
Cornell, Drucilla. At the heart of freedom: feminism, sex, and equality. Princton, N.J: Princeton University Press 1998.
17
Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press 1990.
18
Crenshaw, Kimberle. *Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum. 1989;1989.
19
Jennifer C. Nash. *re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review. 2008;1–15.
20
Kimberle Crenshaw. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review. 1991;43:1241–99.
21
Yuval-Davis N. Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2006;13:193–209. doi: 10.1177/1350506806065752
22
Yoshida K. Towards Intersectionality in the European Court of Human Rights: The Case of B.S. v Spain. Feminist Legal Studies. 2013;21:195–204. doi: 10.1007/s10691-013-9241-1
23
Conaghan J. Intersectionality and the Feminist Project in Law. Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Location. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis 2008.
24
Conaghan J. Intersectionality and the Feminist Project in Law. Intersectionality and beyond. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge-Cavendish 2009.
25
Munro V. * Chapter 3: On Reform and Reforming Rights. Law and politics at the perimeter: re-evaluating key debates in feminist theory. Oxford: Hart 2007.
26
Nedelsky, Jennifer. * Reconceiving Rights as Relationship. Review of Constitutional Studies. 1993;1.
27
Nussbaum, Martha Craven. * Chapters 1 and 2. Sex & social justice. New York: Oxford University Press 1999.
28
Lacey N. * Chapter 1: From Individual to Group? A Feminist Analysis of the Limits of Anti-Discrimination Legislation. Unspeakable subjects: feminist essays in legal and social theory. Oxford: Hart 1998:19–45.
29
Smart C. * Chapters 1 and 7. Feminism and the power of law. London: Routledge 1989.
30
MacKinnon, Catharine A. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 1989.
31
MacKinnon, Catharine A. Women’s lives, men’s laws. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2004.
32
Gilligan C. In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. 38th print. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press 2003.
33
Irigaray, Luce, Montin, Karin. Thinking the difference: for a peaceful revolution. London: Athlone 1994.
34
Pateman, Carole. The sexual contract. Cambridge: Polity 1988.
35
Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press 1990.
36
Cornell, Drucilla. At the heart of freedom: feminism, sex, and equality. Princton, N.J: Princeton University Press 1998.
37
Robin West. Jurisprudence and Gender. The University of Chicago Law Review. 1988;55:1–72.
38
Beauvoir, Simone de, Borde, Constance, Malovany-Chevallier, Sheila. The second sex. New York: Vintage 2011.
39
Williams, Patricia J. The alchemy of race and rights. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 1991.
40
Halley, Janet E. Split decisions: how and why to take a break from feminism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2008.
41
Smart C. Feminism and the power of law. London: Routledge 1989.
42
Anthias F, Yuval-Davis N, Cain H. Racialized boundaries: race, nation, gender, colour and class and the anti-racist struggle. London: Routledge 1992.
43
Robson R. Sappho goes to law school: fragments in lesbian legal theory. New York: Columbia University Press 1998.
44
Okin SM. Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books 1989.
45
Mill JS. The subjection of women. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer 1869.
46
Butler J. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge 2006.
47
Nancy Fraser, Axel Honneth. Redistribution or Recognition? Verso .
48
Moran, Leslie J. *Judicial Diversity and the Challenge of Sexuality: Some Preliminary Findings. Sydney Law Review. 2006;28.
49
Hunter R, McGlynn C, Rackley E. *Chapter 1. Feminist Judgments: An Introduction. Feminist judgments: from theory to practice. Oxford: Hart 2010.
50
Hunter R. *Chapter 2. An Account of Feminist Judging. Feminist judgments: from theory to practice. Oxford: Hart 2010.
51
Rackley E. Women, judging and the judiciary: from difference to diversity. Abingdon: Routledge 2013.
52
Diduck A. * Shifting Familiarity. Current Legal Problems. 2005;58:235–54.
53
Olsen F. * The Family and the Market: A Study of Ideology and Legal Reform. Feminist jurisprudence. New York: Oxford University Press 1993.
54
Carol Smart. * The Legal and Moral Ordering of Child Custody. Journal of Law and Society. 1991;18:485–500.
55
Collier R. *A Hard Time to Be a Father?: Reassessing the Relationship Between Law, Policy, and Family (Practices). Journal of Law and Society. 2001;28:520–45. doi: 10.1111/1467-6478.00201
56
Stychin C. Chapter 2: Family Friendly? Rights, Responsibilities and Relationship Recognition. Feminist perspectives on family law. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish 2006.
57
Diduck, Alison, Kaganas, Felicity. Chapter 1. Family law, gender and the state. Oxford: Hart 2012.
58
Cossman B. Family Feuds: Neo-Liberal and Neo-Conservative Visions of the Re-Privatization Project. Privatization, law, and the challenge to feminism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press 2002:169–217.
59
Fineman, Martha. The autonomy myth: a theory of dependency. New York: New Press 2004.
60
Davidoff, Leonore. The family story: blood, contract and intimacy, 1830-1960. London: Longman 1999.
61
Barlow A, Duncan S, Edwards R. Chapter 5: New Labour, the rationality mistake and family policy in Britain. Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. London: Routledge 2002.
62
Lewis J. Chapter 3.1: Individualisation, assumptions about the existence of an adult worker model and the shift towards contractualism. Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. London: Routledge 2002.
63
Lees S. Chapter 3. Carnal knowledge: rape on trial. London: Women’s Press 2002.
64
Friedman J, Valenti J. Chapter 1 & 2. Yes means yes!: visions of female sexual power & a world without rape. Berkeley, Calif: Seal Press 2008.
65
MacKinnon CA. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 1989.
66
Deming ME, Covan EK, Swan SC, et al. Exploring Rape Myths, Gendered Norms, Group Processing, and the Social Context of Rape Among College Women: A Qualitative Analysis. Violence Against Women. 2013;19:465–85. doi: 10.1177/1077801213487044
67
Horvath M, Brown J. Rape: challenging contemporary thinking. London: Routledge 2013.
68
Munro VE. Concerning Consent: Standards of Permissibility in Sexual Relations. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2005;25:335–52. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqi017
69
KELLY L, LOVETT J, REGAN L. A Gap or a Chasm? Attrition in Reported Rape Cases. 2005.
70
Temkin J. Rape and the legal process. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press 2002.
71
Nicola Gavey. Just Sex? Routledge .
72
McGregor J. Is it rape?: on acquaintance rape and taking women’s consent seriously. Aldershot: Ashgate 2005.
73
Munsch CL, Willer R. The Role of Gender Identity Threat in Perceptions of Date Rape and Sexual Coercion. Violence Against Women. 2012;18:1125–46. doi: 10.1177/1077801212465151
74
Aronowitz AA. Chapters 1 & 2. Human trafficking, human misery: the global trade in human beings. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press 2013.
75
Masika R, Oxfam. Gender, trafficking, and slavery. Oxford: Oxfam 2002.
76
Kempadoo K, Doezema J. Global sex workers: rights, resistance, and redefinition. New York: Routledge 1998.
77
Jeffreys S. Chapters 6 & 7. The industrial vagina: the political economy of the global sex trade. London: Routledge 2009.
78
CASE OF RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA. 2010.
79
Cameron S, Newman E. Trafficking in humans: social, cultural and political dimensions. Tokyo: United Nations University Press 2008.
80
Chandran P. Human trafficking handbook: recognising trafficking and modern-day slavery in the UK. London: LexisNexis 2011.
81
Doezema J. Sex slaves and discourse masters: the construction of trafficking. London: Zed 2010.
82
Gallagher AT. The international law of human trafficking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
83
Guild E, Minderhoud PE. Immigration and criminal law in the European Union: the legal measures and social consequences of criminal law in member states on trafficking and smuggling in human beings. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2006.
84
Morris EG. Second class migrants?: gender and migration in the European Union : explaining gender (in)equality in EU immigration, asylum, and trafficking policymaking. Saarbrücken: VDM 2009.
85
Shelley LI. Human trafficking: a global perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
86
Holtmaat R. *The CEDAW: A Holistic Approach to Women’s Equality and Freedom. Women’s human rights: CEDAW in international, regional, and national law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013:95–124.
87
Fredman S. *The Role of Equality and Non-Discrimination Laws in Women’s Economic Participation, Formal and Informal. 2013.
88
Lacey N. Feminist Legal Theory and The Rights of Women. Gender and human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2004:13–57.
89
Byrnes A. The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. The human rights of women: international instruments and African experiences. London: Zed Books in association with World University Service 2002:119–73.
90
Walsh DM. Women’s rights in democratizing states: just debate and gender justice in the public sphere. New York: Cambridge University Press 2011.
91
Brems E. Protecting the Human Rights of Women. International human rights in the 21st century: protecting the rights of groups. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2003:100–41.
92
Charlesworth H. What are "Women’s International Human Rights?”. Human rights of women: national and international perspectives. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press 1994:58–85.
93
Reilly N. Women’s human rights: seeking gender justice in a globalizing age. Cambridge: Polity 2009.
94
Grimshaw et al. P. Chapter 3. Women’s rights and human rights: international historical perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave 2001.
95
Cusack, Simone. CEDAW and the Rights to Non-Discrimination and Equality. Melbourne Journal of International Law. 2013;14.
96
General Recommendation No. 25, on article 4, paragraph 1, of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, on temporary special measures, Paras 6and 7. 2004.
97
General Recommendation No. 28, on the core obligations of States parties under article 2 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. 2001.
98
Hilary Charlesworth, Christine Chinkin and Shelley Wright. * Feminist Approaches to International Law. The American Journal of International Law. 1991;85:613–45.
99
Radacic I. * Gender Equality Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law. 2008;19:841–57. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chn044
100
*Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom. 1985.
101
*Stec and others v. the United Kingdom. 2006.
102
*Leyla Sahin v Turkey. 2005.
103
Marshall, Jill. *Conditions for Freedom - European Human Rights Law and the Islamic Headscarf Debate. Human Rights Quarterly. 2008;30:631–54.
104
Langlaude S. *Indoctrination, Secularism, Religious Liberty, and the ECHR. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2006;55:929–44. doi: 10.1093/iclq/lei135
105
McGlynn C. *RAPE, TORTURE AND THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2009;58. doi: 10.1017/S0020589309001195
106
Ivana Radacic. * Rape cases in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: defining rape and determining the scope of the state’s obligations. European Human Rights Law Review. 2008;357–75.
107
Shazia Choudhry and Jonathan Herring. * Domestic violence and the Human Rights Act 1998: a new means of legal intervention? Public Law. 2006;752–84.
108
Jill Marshall. * A right to personal autonomy at the European Court of Human Rights. European Human Rights Law Review. 2008;337–56.
109
*Brüggemann and Scheuten v The Federal Republic of Germany. 1977.
111
*Tysiac v Poland. 2007.
113
*A, B and C v Ireland. 2010.
114
Paolo Ronchi. A, B and C v Ireland: Europe’s Roe v Wade still has to wait. Law Quarterly Review. 2011;365–9.
115
Charlesworth, Hilary, Chinkin, C. M. The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press 2000.
116
Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte. Who believes in human rights?: reflections on the European Convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006.
117
Women’s Link Worldwide - Women’s Link’s Gender Justice Observatory. http://www.womenslinkworldwide.org/observatory/
118
Hugh Collins. * Discrimination, Equality and Social Inclusion. The Modern Law Review. 2003;66:16–43.
119
Review by: Nicholas Bamforth. * Conceptions of Anti-Discrimination Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2004;24:693–716.
120
Fredman S. * Equality: A New Generation? Industrial Law Journal. 2001;30:145–68. doi: 10.1093/ilj/30.2.145
121
Fredman, Sandra. Discrimination law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011.
122
Article 157 Treaty on the Foundation of the EU (TFEU), formerly Article 141 of the EC Treaty. 2012.
123
Directive 75/117 EC. 1975.
124
Defrenne v Sabena (No 2) (1976) C-43/75. 1976.
125
Directive 76/207/EEC. 1976.
126
Directive 2002/73/EC. 2002.
127
Directive 2006/54/EC. 2006.
128
Directive 2004/113/EC. 2004.
129
Article 19 TFEU (ex Article 13 EC). 2012.
130
Directive 2000/43/EC. 2000.
131
Directive 2000/78/EC. 2000.
132
EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. 2000.
133
Burrows N, Robison M. An Assessment of the Recast of Community Equality Laws. European Law Journal. 2007;13:186–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00363.x
134
Masselot A. The State of Gender Equality Law in the European Union. European Law Journal. 2007;13:152–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00361.x
135
Equality Act 2010. 2010.
136
Case C-249/96, Grant v. South-west Trains Ltd. [1998] ECR I-621. 1998.
137
Porcelli v Strathclyde [1986] ICR 564. 1986.
138
*Bahl v The Law Society & Anor [2004] EWCA Civ 1070. 2004.
139
*R v Birmingham CC ex parte EOC [1989] IRLR 173; [1989] AC 1155; 2 WLR 520; 1 All ER 769, HL. *1155 Birmingham City Council Appellants v Equal Opportunities Commission Respondents. 1989.
140
House of Lords. *James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] ICR 554; [1990] IRLR 288; 2 AC 751; 3 WLR 55; 2 All ER 607, HL. 1990.
141
Industrial Tribunal. Price v Civil Service Commission [1978] IRLR 3. 1978.
142
Employment Appeal Tribunal. Watches of Switzerland v Savell [1983] IRLR 141. 1983.
143
London Underground v Edwards (No 2) [1999] I.C.R. 494. *494 London Underground Ltd. v Edwards (No. 2). 1998.
144
European Court of Justice. Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber Von Hartz (170/84) [1986] ECR 1607. 1986.
145
Court of Justice of The European Communities. *Enderby v Frenchay Health Authority (Case C-127/92) [1993] IRLR 591. 1993.
146
*R v Secretary of State for Employment ex parte Seymour-Smith and Perez (167/97) [1999] ECR I-623. 1999.
147
Court of Justice of the European Communities. *Cadman v Health & Safety Executive (Equal Opportunities Commission intervening) (17/05) [2007] IRLR 969. 2007.
148
McGlynn, Clare. * Reclaiming a Feminist Vision: The Reconciliation of Paid Work and Family Life in European Union Law and Policy. Columbia Journal of European Law. 2001;7.
149
Sandra Fredman. * A difference with distinction: pregnancy and parenthood reassessed. Law Quarterly Review. 1994;110:106–23.
150
Court of Justice of The European Communities. *Dekker (177/88) [1990] ECR I-3941. 1990.
151
*Webb v EMO (32/93) [1994] ECR I-3567. 1994.
152
Court of Justice of The European Communities. *Tele Danmark A/S (109/00) [2001] ECR I-6993. 2001.
153
Directive 92/85 Pregnant Workers Directive.
154
Directive 2010/18 Parental Leave Directive.
155
Directive 97/81 Part Time Work Directive.
156
McCrudden C. *Rethinking Positive Action. Industrial Law Journal. 1986;15:219–43. doi: 10.1093/ilj/15.1.219
157
Barmes L. The Diversity Approach to Achieving Equality: Potential and Pitfalls. Industrial Law Journal. 2003;32:274–96. doi: 10.1093/ilj/32.4.274
158
Burrows N, Robison M. *Positive Action for Women in Employment: Time to Align with Europe? Journal of Law and Society. 2006;33:24–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00345.x
159
Court of Justice of the European Communities. *Kalanke (450/93) [1995] ECR I-3051. 1995.
160
*Marschall v Land Nordrhein Westfalen (409/95) [1997] ECR I-6363. 1997.
161
Badeck (158/97) [2000] ECR I-1875. 2000.
162
Court of Justice of The European Communities. *Abrahamsson v Fogelqvist (407/98) [2000] ECR I-5539. 2000.
163
*Lommers (476/99) [2002] ECR I-2891. 2002.
164
Court of Justice of the European Communities (Second Chamber). *Briheche v Ministre de l’Intérieur (319/03) [2004] ECR I-8807. 2004.
165
*Roca Álvarez v Sesa Start España ETT SA (104/09) [2011] 1 CMLR 28. 2011.
166
Volpp L. Feminism versus Multiculturalism. Columbia Law Review. 2001;101. doi: 10.2307/1123774
167
Marshall, Jill. Conditions for Freedom - European Human Rights Law and the Islamic Headscarf Debate. Human Rights Quarterly. 2008;30.
168
Steiner HJ, Philip. International human rights in context : law, politics, morals : text and materials. 2008.
169
Rao A. The Politics of gender and culture in international human rights discourse. Women’s rights, human rights: international feminist perspectives. New York: Routledge 1995.
170
Marshall J. Freedom of Religious Expression and Gender Equality: Sahin v Turkey. Modern Law Review. 2006;69:452–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00591_1.x
171
Okin, Susan Moller, Cohen, Joshua, Howard, Matthew, et al. Is multiculturalism bad for women? Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1999.
172
Bayefsky AF. General Approaches to Domestic Application of Women’s International Human Rights Law. Human rights of women: national and international perspectives. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press 1994:351–74.
173
Parekh, Bhikhu C. Conceptualising human beings. Rethinking multiculturalism: cultural diversity and political theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2006.
174
Karaduman v Turkey (Application No. 16278/90), 74 Eur. Comm’n. H.R. Dec. & Rep. 93 (1993). 1993.
175
Dahlab v Switzerland (Application No. 42393/98, ECHR 2001-V). 2001.
176
Sahin v Turkey (Application No. 44774/98). 2005.
177
House of Lords. R (Shabina Begum) v Denbigh High School Governors (HL) (2006) UKHL 15. 2006.
178
Law No 2004-228 of March 15, 2004, JO March 17 2004 p 5190 JCP 2004. 2004.
179
Araji SK. Crimes of Honour and Shame: Violence Against Women in Non-Western and Western Societies. The Red Feather Journal of Postmodern Criminology. Published Online First: 2000.
180
Okin SM, Cohen J, Howard M, et al. Is multiculturalism bad for women? Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1999.
181
Coomaraswamy R. Identity Within: Cultural Relativism, Minority Rights and the Empowerment of Women. Men’s laws, women’s lives: a constitutional perspective on religion, common law, and culture in South Asia. New Delhi: Women Unlimited 2005.
182
Mullally S. Feminism and Multicultural Dilemmas in India: Revisiting the Shah Bano Case. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2004;24:671–92. doi: 10.1093/ojls/24.4.671
183
Siddiqui H. ‘There is no “honour” in domestic violence, only shame!’ Women’s struggles against ‘honour’ crimes in the UK. ‘Honour’: crimes, paradigms, and violence against women. London: Zed Books 2005.
184
An-Na’im AA. State Responsibility under International Human Rights Law to Change Religious and Customary Laws. Human rights of women: national and international perspectives. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press 1994:167–88.
185
Marshall J. Chapter 7. Humanity, freedom and feminism. Aldershot: Ashgate 2005.
186
Copelon, Rhonda. Gender Crimes as War Crimes: Integrating Crimes against Women into International Criminal Law. McGill Law Journal. 2000;46.
187
Viseur Sellers P. Individual(s) Liability for Collective Sexual Violence. Gender and human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2004.
188
Askin KD. Gender Crimes Jurisprudence in the ICTR: Positive Developments. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2005;3:1007–18. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqi061
189
Chinkin C. Rape and Sexual Abuse of Women in International Law. European Journal of International Law. 1994;5:326–41.
190
Chesterman, Simon. Never Again . . . and Again: Law, Order, and the Gender of War Crimes in Bosnia and Beyond. Yale Journal of International Law. 1997;22.
