Bibliography for LAWSG027: Gender, Law and the State: Current Legal Issues BETA

‘*A, B and C v Ireland’. 2010. Web. <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-102332#{"itemid":["001-102332"]}>.

‘*Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom’. 1985. Web. <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-57416#{"itemid":["001-57416"]}>.

An-Na’im, A. A. ‘State Responsibility under International Human Rights Law to Change Religious and Customary Laws’. Human Rights of Women: National and International Perspectives. Pennsylvania studies in human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994. 167–188. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt3fhxkd.11>.

Anthias, Floya, Nira Yuval-Davis, and Harriet Cain. Racialized Boundaries: Race, Nation, Gender, Colour and Class and the Anti-Racist Struggle. London: Routledge, 1992. Web. <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203992920>.

Araji, S. K. ‘Crimes of Honour and Shame: Violence Against Women in Non-Western and Western Societies’. The Red Feather Journal of Postmodern Criminology (2000): n. pag. Web. <http://www.critcrim.org/redfeather/journal-pomocrim/vol-8-shaming/araji.html>.

Aronowitz, Alexis A. ‘Chapters 1 & 2’. Human Trafficking, Human Misery: The Global Trade in Human Beings. 1st paperback edition. Global crime and justice. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press, 2013. Print.

‘Article 19 TFEU (Ex Article 13 EC)’. 2012. Web. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT>.

‘Article 157 Treaty on the Foundation of the EU (TFEU), Formerly Article 141 of the EC Treaty’. 2012. Web. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT>.

Askin, K. D. ‘Gender Crimes Jurisprudence in the ICTR: Positive Developments’. Journal of International Criminal Justice 3.4 (2005): 1007–1018. Web.

Badeck (158/97) [2000] ECR I-1875. N.p., 2000. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I6D798971E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

‘*Bahl v The Law Society & Anor [2004] EWCA Civ 1070’. 2004. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/1070.html>.

Barlow, A., S. Duncan, and R. Edwards. ‘Chapter 5: New Labour, the Rationality Mistake and Family Policy in Britain’. Analysing Families: Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice. London: Routledge, 2002. Print.

Barmes, L. ‘The Diversity Approach to Achieving Equality: Potential and Pitfalls’. Industrial Law Journal 32.4 (2003): 274–296. Web.

Bayefsky, A.F. ‘General Approaches to Domestic Application of Women’s International Human Rights Law’. Human Rights of Women: National and International Perspectives. Pennsylvania studies in human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994. 351–374. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt3fhxkd.19>.

Beauvoir, Simone de, Borde, Constance, and Malovany-Chevallier, Sheila. The Second Sex. New York: Vintage, 2011. Print.

Birgit Christensen and Andrew F. Smith. ‘Equality and Justice: Remarks on a Necessary Relationship’. Hypatia 20.2 (2005): 155–163. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3811169>.

Brems, Eva. ‘Protecting the Human Rights of Women’. International Human Rights in the 21st Century: Protecting the Rights of Groups. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2003. 100–141. Print.

‘*Brüggemann and Scheuten v The Federal Republic of Germany’. 1977. Web. <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-74824#{"itemid":["001-74824"]}>.

Burrows, Noreen, and Muriel Robison. ‘An Assessment of the Recast of Community Equality Laws’. European Law Journal 13.2 (2007): 186–203. Web.

---. ‘*Positive Action for Women in Employment: Time to Align with Europe?’ Journal of Law and Society 33.1 (2006): 24–41. Web.

Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. 2nd ed. Routledge classics. New York: Routledge, 2006. Web. <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203824979>.

Byrnes, Andrew. ‘The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women’. The Human Rights of Women: International Instruments and African Experiences. London: Zed Books in association with World University Service, 2002. 119–173. Print.

Cameron, Sally, and Edward Newman. Trafficking in Humans: Social, Cultural and Political Dimensions. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2008. Print.

Carol Smart. ‘* The Legal and Moral Ordering of Child Custody’. Journal of Law and Society 18.4 (1991): 485–500. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1410322>.

‘Case C-249/96, Grant v. South-West Trains Ltd. [1998] ECR I-621’. 1998. Web. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:61996CJ0249&from=EN>.

‘CASE OF RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA’. 2010. Web. <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-96549#{"itemid":["001-96549"]}>.

Chandran, Parosha. Human Trafficking Handbook: Recognising Trafficking and Modern-Day Slavery in the UK. London: LexisNexis, 2011. Print.

Charlesworth, Hilary. ‘What Are "Women’s International Human Rights?”’. Human Rights of Women: National and International Perspectives. Pennsylvania studies in human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994. 58–85. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt3fhxkd.7>.

Charlesworth, Hilary and Chinkin, C. M. The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis. Melland Schill studies in international law. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000. Print.

Chesterman, Simon. ‘Never Again . . . and Again: Law, Order, and the Gender of War Crimes in Bosnia and Beyond’. Yale Journal of International Law 22 (1997): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjil22&id=309&collection=journals&index=>.

Chinkin, C. ‘Rape and Sexual Abuse of Women in International Law’. European Journal of International Law 5.3 (1994): 326–341. Web. <http://ejil.oxfordjournals.org/content/5/1/326.citation>.

Christine A. Littleton. ‘Reconstructing Sexual Equality’. California Law Review 75.4 (1987): 1279–1337. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3480595>.

Collier, Richard. ‘*A Hard Time to Be a Father?: Reassessing the Relationship Between Law, Policy, and Family (Practices)’. Journal of Law and Society 28.4 (2001): 520–545. Web.

Conaghan, J. ‘Intersectionality and the Feminist Project in Law’. Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Location. Social Justice. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 2008. Web. <http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=355908>.

Conaghan, Joanne. ‘Intersectionality and the Feminist Project in Law’. Intersectionality and Beyond. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009. Web. <https://kar.kent.ac.uk/1900/1/Intersectionality_Feminist_Project15NOV07DP.pdf>.

Coomaraswamy, R. ‘Identity Within: Cultural Relativism, Minority Rights and the Empowerment of Women’. Men’s Laws, Women’s Lives: A Constitutional Perspective on Religion, Common Law, and Culture in South Asia. New Delhi: Women Unlimited, 2005. Print.

Copelon, Rhonda. ‘Gender Crimes as War Crimes: Integrating Crimes against Women into International Criminal Law’. McGill Law Journal 46 (2000): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mcgil46&id=227&collection=journals&index=>.

Cornell, Drucilla. At the Heart of Freedom: Feminism, Sex, and Equality. Princton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1998. Print.

---. At the Heart of Freedom: Feminism, Sex, and Equality. Princton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1998. Print.

Cossman, B. ‘Family Feuds: Neo-Liberal and Neo-Conservative Visions of the Re-Privatization Project’. Privatization, Law, and the Challenge to Feminism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002. 169–217. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/9781442678774.9>.

‘Course Information’: : n. pag. Print.

Court of Justice of The European Communities. *Abrahamsson v Fogelqvist (407/98) [2000] ECR I-5539. N.p., 2000. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I47B76630E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Court of Justice of the European Communities. *Cadman v Health & Safety Executive (Equal Opportunities Commission Intervening) (17/05) [2007] IRLR 969. N.p., 2007. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I709A06E0880811DB92B1C1B25B24F692/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Court of Justice of The European Communities. *Dekker (177/88) [1990] ECR I-3941. N.p., 1990. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I9639D180E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&amp;crumb-action=reset&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.

---. *Enderby v Frenchay Health Authority (Case C-127/92) [1993] IRLR 591. N.p., 1993. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA1777930E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Court of Justice of the European Communities. *Kalanke (450/93) [1995] ECR I-3051. N.p., 1995. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID1747A20E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Court of Justice of The European Communities. *Tele Danmark A/S (109/00) [2001] ECR I-6993. N.p., 2001. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICE7BB710E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Court of Justice of the European Communities (Second Chamber). *Briheche v Ministre de l’Intérieur (319/03) [2004] ECR I-8807. N.p., 2004. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I7A7E3580E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Crenshaw, Kimberle. ‘*Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics’. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989 (1989): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf1989&id=143&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf>.

Cusack, Simone. ‘CEDAW and the Rights to Non-Discrimination and Equality’. Melbourne Journal of International Law 14 (2013): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/meljil14&id=64&collection=journals&index=>.

‘*D v Ireland’. 2006. Web. <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-76233#{"itemid":["001-76233"]}>.

‘Dahlab v Switzerland (Application No. 42393/98, ECHR 2001-V)’. 2001. Web. <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-22643#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-22643%22]}>.

Davidoff, Leonore. The Family Story: Blood, Contract and Intimacy, 1830-1960. Women and men in history. London: Longman, 1999. Print.

‘Defrenne v Sabena (No 2) (1976) C-43/75’. 1976. Web. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61975CJ0043>.

Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte. Who Believes in Human Rights?: Reflections on the European Convention. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Web. <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618192>.

Deming, M. E. et al. ‘Exploring Rape Myths, Gendered Norms, Group Processing, and the Social Context of Rape Among College Women: A Qualitative Analysis’. Violence Against Women 19.4 (2013): 465–485. Web.

Diduck, A. ‘* Shifting Familiarity’. Current Legal Problems 58 (2005): 235–254. Web. <http://clp.oxfordjournals.org/content/58/1.toc>.

Diduck, Alison and Kaganas, Felicity. ‘Chapter 1’. Family Law, Gender and the State. 3rd ed. Oxford: Hart, 2012. Print.

‘Directive 75/117 EC’. 1975. Web. <http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/employment_and_social_policy/employment_rights_and_work_organisation/c10905_en.htm>.

‘Directive 76/207/EEC’. 1976. Web. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:31976L0207&qid=1418055475418&from=EN>.

‘Directive 92/85 Pregnant Workers Directive’. Web. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31992L0085:EN:HTML>.

‘Directive 97/81 Part Time Work Directive’. Web. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31997L0081:EN:HTML>.

‘Directive 2000/43/EC’. 2000. Web. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32000L0043&from=EN>.

‘Directive 2000/78/EC’. 2000. Web. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2000:303:0016:0022:EN:PDF>.

‘Directive 2002/73/EC’. 2002. Web. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32002L0073&rid=1>.

‘Directive 2004/113/EC’. 2004. Web. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:373:0037:0043:EN:PDF>.

‘Directive 2006/54/EC’. 2006. Web. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32006L0054&from=EN>.

‘Directive 2010/18 Parental Leave Directive’. Web. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:068:0013:0020:EN:PDF>.

Doezema, Jo. Sex Slaves and Discourse Masters: The Construction of Trafficking. London: Zed, 2010. Print.

Employment Appeal Tribunal. Watches of Switzerland v Savell [1983] IRLR 141. N.p., 1983. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA8E35A90E43611DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

‘Equality Act 2010’. 2010. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents>.

‘EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’. 2000. Web. <http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/charter/index_en.htm>.

European Court of Justice. Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber Von Hartz (170/84) [1986] ECR 1607. N.p., 1986. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I748F3250E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Fineman, Martha. The Autonomy Myth: A Theory of Dependency. New York: New Press, 2004. Print.

Fredman, S. ‘* Equality: A New Generation?’ Industrial Law Journal 30.2 (2001): 145–168. Web.

Fredman, Sandra. Discrimination Law. 2nd ed. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Print.

Fredman, Sandra. ‘*The Role of Equality and Non-Discrimination Laws in Women’s Economic Participation, Formal and Informal’. 2013. Web. <http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Women/WGWomen/Pages/ESL.aspx>.

Freeman, Michael D. A. and Lloyd of Hampstead, Dennis Lloyd. ‘Chapter on Feminist Jurisprudence’. Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence. 8th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2008. Print.

Friedman, Jaclyn, and Jessica Valenti. ‘Chapter 1 & 2’. Yes Means Yes!: Visions of Female Sexual Power & a World without Rape. Berkeley, Calif: Seal Press, 2008. Print.

Gallagher, Anne T. The International Law of Human Trafficking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Web. <https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511761065>.

‘General Recommendation No. 25, on Article 4, Paragraph 1, of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, on Temporary Special Measures, Paras 6and 7’. 2004. Web. <http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/recommendations/>.

‘General Recommendation No. 28, on the Core Obligations of States Parties under Article 2 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women’. 2001. Web. <http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/comments.htm>.

Gilligan, Carol. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. 38th print. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2003. Web.

Grimshaw et al., Patricia. ‘Chapter 3’. Women’s Rights and Human Rights: International Historical Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001. Print.

Guild, Elspeth, and P. E. Minderhoud. Immigration and Criminal Law in the European Union: The Legal Measures and Social Consequences of Criminal Law in Member States on Trafficking and Smuggling in Human Beings. Immigration and asylum law and policy in Europe. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006. Web.

Halley, Janet E. Split Decisions: How and Why to Take a Break from Feminism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2008. Print.

---. Split Decisions: How and Why to Take a Break from Feminism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2008. Print.

Hilary Charlesworth, Christine Chinkin and Shelley Wright. ‘* Feminist Approaches to International Law’. The American Journal of International Law 85.4 (1991): 613–645. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2203269>.

Holtmaat, Rikki. ‘*The CEDAW:  A Holistic Approach to Women’s Equality and Freedom’. Women’s Human Rights: CEDAW in International, Regional, and National Law. Studies on human rights conventions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. 95–124. Web. <https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/womens-human-rights/cedaw/F0BA5E99167E804E5A8541E37003637F>.

Horvath, Miranda, and Jennifer Brown. Rape: Challenging Contemporary Thinking. London: Routledge, 2013. Print.

House of Lords. *James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] ICR 554; [1990] IRLR 288; 2 AC 751; 3 WLR 55; 2 All ER 607, HL. N.p., 1990. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICBD48150E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

---. R (Shabina Begum) v Denbigh High School Governors (HL) (2006) UKHL 15. N.p., 2006. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=ICEDAD020F83611DAB97BB67935546CF2&amp;crumb-action=reset&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.

Hugh Collins. ‘* Discrimination, Equality and Social Inclusion’. The Modern Law Review 66.1 (2003): 16–43. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097547>.

Hunter, Rosemary. ‘*Chapter 2. An Account of Feminist Judging’. Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart, 2010. Web. <https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/feminist-judgments-from-theory-to-practice/>.

Hunter, Rosemary C. ‘* Chapter 1: Introduction: Feminism and Equality’. Rethinking Equality Projects in Law: Feminist Challenges. Oñati international series in law and society. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008. Web. <https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/rethinking-equality-projects-in-law-feminist-challenges/>.

Hunter, Rosemary, Clare McGlynn, and Erika Rackley. ‘*Chapter 1. Feminist Judgments: An Introduction’. Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice. Oxford: Hart, 2010. Web. <https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/feminist-judgments-from-theory-to-practice/>.

Industrial Tribunal. Price v Civil Service Commission [1978] IRLR 3. N.p., 1978. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I81C21C80E43611DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Irigaray, Luce and Montin, Karin. Thinking the Difference: For a Peaceful Revolution. London: Athlone, 1994. Print.

Ivana Radacic. ‘* Rape Cases in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Defining Rape and Determining the Scope of the State’s Obligations’. European Human Rights Law Review 3 (2008): 357–375. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF811B810253811DD86CC82E94475513A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Jeffreys, Sheila. ‘Chapters 6 & 7’. The Industrial Vagina: The Political Economy of the Global Sex Trade. RIPE series in global political economy. London: Routledge, 2009. Print.

Jennifer C. Nash. ‘*re-Thinking Intersectionality’. Feminist Review 89 (2008): 1–15. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/40663957>.

Jill Marshall. ‘* A Right to Personal Autonomy at the European Court of Human Rights’. European Human Rights Law Review 3 (2008): 337–356. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF8119100253811DD86CC82E94475513A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Joanne Conaghan. ‘Reassessing the Feminist Theoretical Project in Law’. Journal of Law and Society 27.3 (2000): 351–385. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1410380>.

‘Karaduman v Turkey (Application No. 16278/90), 74 Eur. Comm’n. H.R. Dec. & Rep. 93 (1993)’. 1993. Web. <http://www.strasbourgconsortium.org/common/document.view.php?DocumentID=4237>.

KELLY, L., J. LOVETT, and L. REGAN. ‘A Gap or a Chasm? Attrition in Reported Rape Cases’. 2005. Web. <http://www.apho.org.uk/resource/item.aspx?RID=78107>.

Kempadoo, Kamala, and Jo Doezema. Global Sex Workers: Rights, Resistance, and Redefinition. New York: Routledge, 1998. Web. <http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0651/97045759-d.html>.

Kimberle Crenshaw. ‘Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color’. Stanford Law Review 43.6 (1991): 1241–1299. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039>.

Lacey, Nicola. ‘* Chapter 1:  From Individual to Group? A Feminist Analysis of the Limits of Anti-Discrimination Legislation’. Unspeakable Subjects: Feminist Essays in Legal and Social Theory. Oxford: Hart, 1998. 19–45. Web.

Lacey, Nicola. ‘* Introduction to the Essays’. Unspeakable Subjects: Feminist Essays in Legal and Social Theory. Oxford: Hart, 1998. Web.

Lacey, Nicola. ‘Feminist Legal Theory and The Rights of Women’. Gender and Human Rights. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. 13–57. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma990016212650204761&amp;context=L&amp;vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&amp;lang=en&amp;search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&amp;adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&amp;isFrbr=true&amp;tab=Everything&amp;query=title,contains,Gender%20and%20Human%20Rights,AND&amp;query=creator,contains,knop,AND&amp;sortby=date_d&amp;facet=frbrgroupid,include,9081303978816451051&amp;mode=advanced&amp;offset=0>.

Langlaude, S. ‘*Indoctrination, Secularism, Religious Liberty, and the ECHR’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55.4 (2006): 929–944. Web.

‘Law No 2004-228 of March 15, 2004, JO March 17 2004 p 5190 JCP 2004’. 2004. Web. <http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000417977&dateTexte=&categorieLien=id>.

Lees, Sue. ‘Chapter 3’. Carnal Knowledge: Rape on Trial. Rev. and updated ed. London: Women’s Press, 2002. Print.

Lewis, J. ‘Chapter 3.1: Individualisation, Assumptions about the Existence of an Adult Worker Model and the Shift towards Contractualism’. Analysing Families: Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice. London: Routledge, 2002. Print.

‘*Leyla Sahin v Turkey’. 2005. Web. <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-70956#{"itemid":["001-70956"]}>.

‘*Lommers (476/99) [2002] ECR I-2891’. 2002. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IE26FDBD0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.

‘London Underground v Edwards (No 2) [1999] I.C.R. 494’. *494 London Underground Ltd. v Edwards (No. 2) 1998. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE309AAD0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

MacKinnon, C. ‘Chapter 13: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence’. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1989. Print.

MacKinnon, Catharine A. ‘* Chapter 2: Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination’. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1987. Print.

---. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1989. Print.

MacKinnon, Catharine A. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1989. Print.

MacKinnon, Catharine A. Women’s Lives, Men’s Laws. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2004. Web.

‘*Marschall v Land Nordrhein Westfalen (409/95) [1997] ECR I-6363’. 1997. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IEEF9D9A0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Marshall, Jill. ‘Chapter 7’. Humanity, Freedom and Feminism. Applied legal philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005. Print.

Marshall, Jill. ‘*Conditions for Freedom - European Human Rights Law and the Islamic Headscarf Debate’. Human Rights Quarterly 30.3 (2008): 631–654. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20072862>.

---. ‘Conditions for Freedom - European Human Rights Law and the Islamic Headscarf Debate’. Human Rights Quarterly 30.3 (2008): n. pag. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20072862>.

Marshall, Jill. ‘Freedom of Religious Expression and Gender Equality: Sahin v Turkey’. Modern Law Review 69.3 (2006): 452–461. Web.

Marshall, Jill. ‘Part 1’. Humanity, Freedom and Feminism. Applied legal philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005. Print.

Masika, Rachel and Oxfam. Gender, Trafficking, and Slavery. Oxfam focus on gender. Oxford: Oxfam, 2002. Print.

Masselot, Annick. ‘The State of Gender Equality Law in the European Union’. European Law Journal 13.2 (2007): 152–168. Web.

McCrudden, Christopher. ‘*Rethinking Positive Action’. Industrial Law Journal 15.1 (1986): 219–243. Web.

McGlynn, Clare. ‘* Reclaiming a Feminist Vision: The Reconciliation of Paid Work and Family Life in European Union Law and Policy’. Columbia Journal of European Law 7 (2001): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/coljeul7&id=247&collection=journals&index=journals/coljeul#247>.

McGlynn, Clare. ‘*RAPE, TORTURE AND THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58.03 (2009): n. pag. Web.

McGregor, Joan. Is It Rape?: On Acquaintance Rape and Taking Women’s Consent Seriously. Live questions in ethics and moral philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005. Print.

Mill, John Stuart. The Subjection of Women. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer, 1869. Web. <http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=N&PAGE=toc&SEARCH=2008-18239.dd&LINKTYPE=asBody&D=psbk>.

Moran, Leslie J. ‘*Judicial Diversity and the Challenge of Sexuality: Some Preliminary Findings’. Sydney Law Review 28.4 (2006): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/sydney28&id=559&collection=journals&index=>.

Morris, Eleanor G. Second Class Migrants?: Gender and Migration in the European Union : Explaining Gender (in)Equality in EU Immigration, Asylum, and Trafficking Policymaking. Saarbrücken: VDM, 2009. Print.

Mullally, S. ‘Feminism and Multicultural Dilemmas in India: Revisiting the Shah Bano Case’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24.4 (2004): 671–692. Web.

Munro, V. ‘* Chapter 1’. Law and Politics at the Perimeter: Re-Evaluating Key Debates in Feminist Theory. Legal theory today. Oxford: Hart, 2007. Print.

---. ‘* Chapter 3: On Reform and Reforming Rights’. Law and Politics at the Perimeter: Re-Evaluating Key Debates in Feminist Theory. Legal theory today. Oxford: Hart, 2007. Print.

Munro, V. E. ‘Concerning Consent: Standards of Permissibility in Sexual Relations’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25.2 (2005): 335–352. Web.

Munro, Vanessa. ‘* Chapter 6: Equality, Respect and Feminist Futures’. Law and Politics at the Perimeter: Re-Evaluating Key Debates in Feminist Theory. Legal theory today. Oxford: Hart, 2007. Print.

Munsch, C. L., and R. Willer. ‘The Role of Gender Identity Threat in Perceptions of Date Rape and Sexual Coercion’. Violence Against Women 18.10 (2012): 1125–1146. Web.

Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth. Redistribution or Recognition? Verso. Print.

Nedelsky, Jennifer. ‘* Reconceiving Rights as Relationship’. Review of Constitutional Studies 1 (1993): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/revicos1&id=3&collection=journals&index=journals/revicos#3>.

Nicola Gavey. Just Sex? Routledge. Print.

Nussbaum, Martha Craven. ‘* Chapters 1 and 2’. Sex & Social Justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Print.

Okin, Susan Moller et al. Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7sxzs>.

Okin, Susan Moller et al. Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7sxzs>.

---. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books, 1989. Print.

Olsen, F. ‘* The Family and the Market: A Study of Ideology and Legal Reform’. Feminist Jurisprudence. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. Print.

Paolo Ronchi. ‘A, B and C v Ireland: Europe’s Roe v Wade Still Has to Wait’. Law Quarterly Review 127 (2011): 365–369. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I3C0F90D09A2711E09D29F4D8A5F97F11/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Parekh, Bhikhu C. ‘Conceptualising Human Beings’. Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14687495240004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

Pateman, Carole. The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity, 1988. Print.

Porcelli v Strathclyde [1986] ICR 564. N.p., 1986. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I23B4B0C0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

‘*R v Birmingham CC Ex Parte EOC [1989] IRLR 173; [1989] AC 1155; 2 WLR 520; 1 All ER 769, HL’. *1155 Birmingham City Council Appellants v Equal Opportunities Commission Respondents 1989. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I33C34170E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

*R v Secretary of State for Employment Ex Parte Seymour-Smith and Perez (167/97) [1999] ECR I-623. N.p., 1999. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I653D1E60E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Rackley, Erika. Women, Judging and the Judiciary: From Difference to Diversity. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013. Print.

Radacic, I. ‘* Gender Equality Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’. European Journal of International Law 19.4 (2008): 841–857. Web.

Rao, A. ‘The Politics of Gender and Culture in International Human Rights Discourse’. Women’s Rights, Human Rights: International Feminist Perspectives. New York: Routledge, 1995. Print.

Reilly, Niamh. Women’s Human Rights: Seeking Gender Justice in a Globalizing Age. Cambridge: Polity, 2009. Print.

Review by: Nicholas Bamforth. ‘* Conceptions of Anti-Discrimination Law’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24.4 (2004): 693–716. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3600533>.

Review by: Nicola Lacey. ‘Feminist Legal Theory’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 9.3 (1989): 383–394. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/764424>.

Robin West. ‘Jurisprudence and Gender’. The University of Chicago Law Review 55.1 (1988): 1–72. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1599769>.

Robson, Ruthann. Sappho Goes to Law School: Fragments in Lesbian Legal Theory. Between men--between women. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998. Print.

*Roca Álvarez v Sesa Start España ETT SA (104/09) [2011] 1 CMLR 28. N.p., 2011. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I6465D470EC7811DF9E738AE5417A83F5/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

‘Sahin v Turkey (Application No. 44774/98)’. 2005. Web. <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-70956#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-70956%22]}>.

Sandra Fredman. ‘* A Difference with Distinction: Pregnancy and Parenthood Reassessed’. Law Quarterly Review 110.Jan (1994): 106–123. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICCF9F040E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Scales, A. ‘The Emergence of Feminist Jurisprudence: An Essay’. Feminist Jurisprudence. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. Print.

Shazia Choudhry and Jonathan Herring. ‘* Domestic Violence and the Human Rights Act 1998: A New Means of Legal Intervention?’ Public Law Winter (2006): 752–784. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I1357EA60540511DB85F29853495F842F/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

Shelley, Louise I. Human Trafficking: A Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Web.

Siddiqui, H. ‘“There Is No ‘Honour’ in Domestic Violence, Only Shame!” Women’s Struggles against “Honour” Crimes in the UK’. ‘Honour’: Crimes, Paradigms, and Violence against Women. London: Zed Books, 2005. Print.

Smart, Carol. ‘* Chapters 1 and 7’. Feminism and the Power of Law. Sociology of law and crime. London: Routledge, 1989. Web. <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203206164>.

---. Feminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge, 1989. Web. <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134972838>.

‘*Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom’. 2006. Web. <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-73198#{"itemid":["001-73198"]}>.

Steiner, Henry J., and Philip. International Human Rights in Context : Law, Politics, Morals : Text and Materials. N.p., 2008. Web. <http://encore.ulrls.lon.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2991414__SInternational%2520Human%2520Rights%2520in%2520Context%253A%2520law%252C%2520politics%252C%2520morals__Ff%253Afacetlocations%253Aull%253Aull%253ASENATE%2520HOUSE%2520LIBRARY%253A%253A__Orightresult__X4?lang=eng&suite=cobalt>.

Stychin, C. ‘Chapter 2: Family Friendly? Rights, Responsibilities and Relationship Recognition’. Feminist Perspectives on Family Law. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish, 2006. Print.

Temkin, Jennifer. Rape and the Legal Process. 2nd ed. Oxford monographs on criminal law and criminal justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. Print.

‘*Tysiac v Poland’. 2007. Web. <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-79812#{"itemid":["001-79812"]}>.

Viseur Sellers, P. ‘Individual(s) Liability for Collective Sexual Violence’. Gender and Human Rights. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199260911.001.0001>.

‘*Vo v France’. 2004. Web. <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-61887#{"itemid":["001-61887"]}>.

Volpp, Leti. ‘Feminism versus Multiculturalism’. Columbia Law Review 101.5 (2001): n. pag. Web.

Walsh, Denise M. Women’s Rights in Democratizing States: Just Debate and Gender Justice in the Public Sphere. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Web. <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511782220>.

‘*Webb v EMO (32/93) [1994] ECR I-3567’. 1994. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF733C1C0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>.

Williams, Patricia J. The Alchemy of Race and Rights. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1991. Print.

‘Women’s Link Worldwide - Women’s Link’s Gender Justice Observatory’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.womenslinkworldwide.org/observatory/>.

Yoshida, Keina. ‘Towards Intersectionality in the European Court of Human Rights: The Case of B.S. v Spain’. Feminist Legal Studies 21.2 (2013): 195–204. Web.

Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1990. Print.

---. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1990. Print.

Yuval-Davis, N. ‘Intersectionality and Feminist Politics’. European Journal of Women’s Studies 13.3 (2006): 193–209. Web.