[1]
‘Course Information’: .
[2]
Lacey, Nicola, ‘* Introduction to the Essays’, in Unspeakable subjects: feminist essays in legal and social theory, Oxford: Hart, 1998.
[3]
V. Munro, ‘* Chapter 1’, in Law and politics at the perimeter: re-evaluating key debates in feminist theory, vol. Legal theory today, Oxford: Hart, 2007.
[4]
Joanne Conaghan, ‘Reassessing the Feminist Theoretical Project in Law’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 351–385, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1410380
[5]
Review by: Nicola Lacey, ‘Feminist Legal Theory’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 383–394, 1989 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/764424
[6]
C. MacKinnon, ‘Chapter 13: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence’, in Toward a feminist theory of the state, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1989.
[7]
Freeman, Michael D. A. and Lloyd of Hampstead, Dennis Lloyd, ‘Chapter on Feminist Jurisprudence’, in Lloyd’s introduction to jurisprudence, 8th ed., London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2008.
[8]
A. Scales, ‘The Emergence of Feminist Jurisprudence: An Essay’, in Feminist jurisprudence, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
[9]
Halley, Janet E., Split decisions: how and why to take a break from feminism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2008.
[10]
Marshall, Jill, ‘Part 1’, in Humanity, freedom and feminism, vol. Applied legal philosophy, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.
[11]
Munro, Vanessa, ‘* Chapter 6: Equality, Respect and feminist Futures’, in Law and politics at the perimeter: re-evaluating key debates in feminist theory, vol. Legal theory today, Oxford: Hart, 2007.
[12]
MacKinnon, Catharine A., ‘* Chapter 2: Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination’, in Feminism unmodified: discourses on life and law, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1987.
[13]
Hunter, Rosemary C., ‘* Chapter 1: Introduction: Feminism and Equality’, in Rethinking equality projects in law: feminist challenges, vol. Oñati international series in law and society, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/rethinking-equality-projects-in-law-feminist-challenges/
[14]
Birgit Christensen and Andrew F. Smith, ‘Equality and Justice: Remarks on a Necessary Relationship’, Hypatia, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 155–163, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3811169
[15]
Christine A. Littleton, ‘Reconstructing Sexual Equality’, California Law Review, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 1279–1337, 1987 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3480595
[16]
Cornell, Drucilla, At the heart of freedom: feminism, sex, and equality. Princton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1998.
[17]
Young, Iris Marion, Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1990.
[18]
Crenshaw, Kimberle, ‘*Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, vol. 1989, 1989 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf1989&id=143&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf
[19]
Jennifer C. Nash, ‘*re-thinking intersectionality’, Feminist Review, no. 89, pp. 1–15, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40663957
[20]
Kimberle Crenshaw, ‘Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color’, Stanford Law Review, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1241–1299, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039
[21]
N. Yuval-Davis, ‘Intersectionality and Feminist Politics’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 193–209, Aug. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1350506806065752.
[22]
K. Yoshida, ‘Towards Intersectionality in the European Court of Human Rights: The Case of B.S. v Spain’, Feminist Legal Studies, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 195–204, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10691-013-9241-1.
[23]
J. Conaghan, ‘Intersectionality and the Feminist Project in Law’, in Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Location, vol. Social Justice, Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=355908
[24]
J. Conaghan, ‘Intersectionality and the Feminist Project in Law’, in Intersectionality and beyond, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/1900/1/Intersectionality_Feminist_Project15NOV07DP.pdf
[25]
V. Munro, ‘* Chapter 3: On Reform and Reforming Rights’, in Law and politics at the perimeter: re-evaluating key debates in feminist theory, vol. Legal theory today, Oxford: Hart, 2007.
[26]
Nedelsky, Jennifer, ‘* Reconceiving Rights as Relationship’, Review of Constitutional Studies, vol. 1, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/revicos1&id=3&collection=journals&index=journals/revicos#3
[27]
Nussbaum, Martha Craven, ‘* Chapters 1 and 2’, in Sex & social justice, New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
[28]
N. Lacey, ‘* Chapter 1: From Individual to Group? A Feminist Analysis of the Limits of Anti-Discrimination Legislation’, in Unspeakable subjects: feminist essays in legal and social theory, Oxford: Hart, 1998, pp. 19–45.
[29]
C. Smart, ‘* Chapters 1 and 7’, in Feminism and the power of law, vol. Sociology of law and crime, London: Routledge, 1989 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203206164
[30]
MacKinnon, Catharine A., Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1989.
[31]
MacKinnon, Catharine A., Women’s lives, men’s laws. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2004.
[32]
C. Gilligan, In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development, 38th print. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2003.
[33]
Irigaray, Luce and Montin, Karin, Thinking the difference: for a peaceful revolution. London: Athlone, 1994.
[34]
Pateman, Carole, The sexual contract. Cambridge: Polity, 1988.
[35]
Young, Iris Marion, Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1990.
[36]
Cornell, Drucilla, At the heart of freedom: feminism, sex, and equality. Princton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1998.
[37]
Robin West, ‘Jurisprudence and Gender’, The University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 1–72, 1988 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1599769
[38]
Beauvoir, Simone de, Borde, Constance, and Malovany-Chevallier, Sheila, The second sex. New York: Vintage, 2011.
[39]
Williams, Patricia J., The alchemy of race and rights. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1991.
[40]
Halley, Janet E., Split decisions: how and why to take a break from feminism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2008.
[41]
C. Smart, Feminism and the power of law. London: Routledge, 1989 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134972838
[42]
F. Anthias, N. Yuval-Davis, and H. Cain, Racialized boundaries: race, nation, gender, colour and class and the anti-racist struggle. London: Routledge, 1992 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203992920
[43]
R. Robson, Sappho goes to law school: fragments in lesbian legal theory, vol. Between men--between women. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.
[44]
S. M. Okin, Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books, 1989.
[45]
J. S. Mill, The subjection of women. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer, 1869 [Online]. Available: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=N&PAGE=toc&SEARCH=2008-18239.dd&LINKTYPE=asBody&D=psbk
[46]
J. Butler, Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity, 2nd ed., vol. Routledge classics. New York: Routledge, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203824979
[47]
Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition? Verso.
[48]
Moran, Leslie J., ‘*Judicial Diversity and the Challenge of Sexuality: Some Preliminary Findings’, Sydney Law Review, vol. 28, no. 4, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/sydney28&id=559&collection=journals&index=
[49]
R. Hunter, C. McGlynn, and E. Rackley, ‘*Chapter 1. Feminist Judgments: An Introduction’, in Feminist judgments: from theory to practice, Oxford: Hart, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/feminist-judgments-from-theory-to-practice/
[50]
R. Hunter, ‘*Chapter 2. An Account of Feminist Judging’, in Feminist judgments: from theory to practice, Oxford: Hart, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/feminist-judgments-from-theory-to-practice/
[51]
E. Rackley, Women, judging and the judiciary: from difference to diversity. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.
[52]
A. Diduck, ‘* Shifting Familiarity’, Current Legal Problems, vol. 58, pp. 235–254, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://clp.oxfordjournals.org/content/58/1.toc
[53]
F. Olsen, ‘* The Family and the Market: A Study of Ideology and Legal Reform’, in Feminist jurisprudence, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
[54]
Carol Smart, ‘* The Legal and Moral Ordering of Child Custody’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 485–500, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1410322
[55]
R. Collier, ‘*A Hard Time to Be a Father?: Reassessing the Relationship Between Law, Policy, and Family (Practices)’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 520–545, Dec. 2001, doi: 10.1111/1467-6478.00201.
[56]
C. Stychin, ‘Chapter 2: Family Friendly? Rights, Responsibilities and Relationship Recognition’, in Feminist perspectives on family law, Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish, 2006.
[57]
Diduck, Alison and Kaganas, Felicity, ‘Chapter 1’, in Family law, gender and the state, 3rd ed., Oxford: Hart, 2012.
[58]
B. Cossman, ‘Family Feuds: Neo-Liberal and Neo-Conservative Visions of the Re-Privatization Project’, in Privatization, law, and the challenge to feminism, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002, pp. 169–217 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/9781442678774.9
[59]
Fineman, Martha, The autonomy myth: a theory of dependency. New York: New Press, 2004.
[60]
Davidoff, Leonore, The family story: blood, contract and intimacy, 1830-1960, vol. Women and men in history. London: Longman, 1999.
[61]
A. Barlow, S. Duncan, and R. Edwards, ‘Chapter 5: New Labour, the rationality mistake and family policy in Britain’, in Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice, London: Routledge, 2002.
[62]
J. Lewis, ‘Chapter 3.1: Individualisation, assumptions about the existence of an adult worker model and the shift towards contractualism’, in Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice, London: Routledge, 2002.
[63]
S. Lees, ‘Chapter 3’, in Carnal knowledge: rape on trial, Rev. and Updated ed., London: Women’s Press, 2002.
[64]
J. Friedman and J. Valenti, ‘Chapter 1 & 2’, in Yes means yes!: visions of female sexual power & a world without rape, Berkeley, Calif: Seal Press, 2008.
[65]
C. A. MacKinnon, Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1989.
[66]
M. E. Deming, E. K. Covan, S. C. Swan, and D. L. Billings, ‘Exploring Rape Myths, Gendered Norms, Group Processing, and the Social Context of Rape Among College Women: A Qualitative Analysis’, Violence Against Women, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 465–485, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1077801213487044.
[67]
M. Horvath and J. Brown, Rape: challenging contemporary thinking. London: Routledge, 2013.
[68]
V. E. Munro, ‘Concerning Consent: Standards of Permissibility in Sexual Relations’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 335–352, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqi017.
[69]
L. KELLY, J. LOVETT, and L. REGAN, ‘A Gap or a Chasm? Attrition in Reported Rape Cases’. Home Office, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.apho.org.uk/resource/item.aspx?RID=78107
[70]
J. Temkin, Rape and the legal process, 2nd ed., vol. Oxford monographs on criminal law and criminal justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
[71]
Nicola Gavey, Just Sex? Routledge.
[72]
J. McGregor, Is it rape?: on acquaintance rape and taking women’s consent seriously, vol. Live questions in ethics and moral philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.
[73]
C. L. Munsch and R. Willer, ‘The Role of Gender Identity Threat in Perceptions of Date Rape and Sexual Coercion’, Violence Against Women, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1125–1146, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1177/1077801212465151.
[74]
A. A. Aronowitz, ‘Chapters 1 & 2’, in Human trafficking, human misery: the global trade in human beings, 1st paperback edition., vol. Global crime and justice, Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press, 2013.
[75]
R. Masika and Oxfam, Gender, trafficking, and slavery, vol. Oxfam focus on gender. Oxford: Oxfam, 2002.
[76]
K. Kempadoo and J. Doezema, Global sex workers: rights, resistance, and redefinition. New York: Routledge, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0651/97045759-d.html
[77]
S. Jeffreys, ‘Chapters 6 & 7’, in The industrial vagina: the political economy of the global sex trade, vol. RIPE series in global political economy, London: Routledge, 2009.
[78]
‘CASE OF RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA’. European Court of Human Rights, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-96549#{"itemid":["001-96549"]}
[79]
S. Cameron and E. Newman, Trafficking in humans: social, cultural and political dimensions. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2008.
[80]
P. Chandran, Human trafficking handbook: recognising trafficking and modern-day slavery in the UK. London: LexisNexis, 2011.
[81]
J. Doezema, Sex slaves and discourse masters: the construction of trafficking. London: Zed, 2010.
[82]
A. T. Gallagher, The international law of human trafficking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511761065
[83]
E. Guild and P. E. Minderhoud, Immigration and criminal law in the European Union: the legal measures and social consequences of criminal law in member states on trafficking and smuggling in human beings, vol. Immigration and asylum law and policy in Europe. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006.
[84]
E. G. Morris, Second class migrants?: gender and migration in the European Union : explaining gender (in)equality in EU immigration, asylum, and trafficking policymaking. Saarbrücken: VDM, 2009.
[85]
L. I. Shelley, Human trafficking: a global perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[86]
R. Holtmaat, ‘*The CEDAW: A Holistic Approach to Women’s Equality and Freedom’, in Women’s human rights: CEDAW in international, regional, and national law, vol. Studies on human rights conventions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 95–124 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/womens-human-rights/cedaw/F0BA5E99167E804E5A8541E37003637F
[87]
S. Fredman, ‘*The Role of Equality and Non-Discrimination Laws in Women’s Economic Participation, Formal and Informal’. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Women/WGWomen/Pages/ESL.aspx
[88]
N. Lacey, ‘Feminist Legal Theory and The Rights of Women’, in Gender and human rights, vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 13–57 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma990016212650204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=title,contains,Gender%20and%20Human%20Rights,AND&query=creator,contains,knop,AND&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9081303978816451051&mode=advanced&offset=0
[89]
A. Byrnes, ‘The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women’, in The human rights of women: international instruments and African experiences, London: Zed Books in association with World University Service, 2002, pp. 119–173.
[90]
D. M. Walsh, Women’s rights in democratizing states: just debate and gender justice in the public sphere. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511782220
[91]
E. Brems, ‘Protecting the Human Rights of Women’, in International human rights in the 21st century: protecting the rights of groups, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2003, pp. 100–141.
[92]
H. Charlesworth, ‘What are "Women’s International Human Rights?”’, in Human rights of women: national and international perspectives, vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994, pp. 58–85 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt3fhxkd.7
[93]
N. Reilly, Women’s human rights: seeking gender justice in a globalizing age. Cambridge: Polity, 2009.
[94]
P. Grimshaw et al., ‘Chapter 3’, in Women’s rights and human rights: international historical perspectives, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.
[95]
Cusack, Simone, ‘CEDAW and the Rights to Non-Discrimination and Equality’, Melbourne Journal of International Law, vol. 14, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/meljil14&id=64&collection=journals&index=
[96]
‘General Recommendation No. 25, on article 4, paragraph 1, of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, on temporary special measures, Paras 6and 7’. United Nations, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/recommendations/
[97]
‘General Recommendation No. 28, on the core obligations of States parties under article 2 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women’. United Nations, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/comments.htm
[98]
Hilary Charlesworth, Christine Chinkin and Shelley Wright, ‘* Feminist Approaches to International Law’, The American Journal of International Law, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 613–645, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2203269
[99]
I. Radacic, ‘* Gender Equality Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, European Journal of International Law, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 841–857, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1093/ejil/chn044.
[100]
‘*Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom’. European Court of Human Rights, 1985 [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-57416#{"itemid":["001-57416"]}
[101]
‘*Stec and others v. the United Kingdom’. European Court of Human Rights, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-73198#{"itemid":["001-73198"]}
[102]
‘*Leyla Sahin v Turkey’. European Court of Human Rights, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-70956#{"itemid":["001-70956"]}
[103]
Marshall, Jill, ‘*Conditions for Freedom - European Human Rights Law and the Islamic Headscarf Debate’, Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 631–654, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20072862
[104]
S. Langlaude, ‘*Indoctrination, Secularism, Religious Liberty, and the ECHR’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 929–944, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1093/iclq/lei135.
[105]
C. McGlynn, ‘*RAPE, TORTURE AND THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 58, no. 03, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1017/S0020589309001195.
[106]
Ivana Radacic, ‘* Rape cases in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: defining rape and determining the scope of the state’s obligations’, European Human Rights Law Review, no. 3, pp. 357–375, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF811B810253811DD86CC82E94475513A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[107]
Shazia Choudhry and Jonathan Herring, ‘* Domestic violence and the Human Rights Act 1998: a new means of legal intervention?’, Public Law, no. Winter, pp. 752–784, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I1357EA60540511DB85F29853495F842F/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[108]
Jill Marshall, ‘* A right to personal autonomy at the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, no. 3, pp. 337–356, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF8119100253811DD86CC82E94475513A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[109]
‘*Brüggemann and Scheuten v The Federal Republic of Germany’. European Court of Human Rights, 1977 [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-74824#{"itemid":["001-74824"]}
[110]
‘*Vo v France’. European Court of Human Rights, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-61887#{"itemid":["001-61887"]}
[111]
‘*Tysiac v Poland’. European Court of Human Rights, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-79812#{"itemid":["001-79812"]}
[112]
‘*D v Ireland’. European Court of Human Rights, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-76233#{"itemid":["001-76233"]}
[113]
‘*A, B and C v Ireland’. European Court of Human Rights, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-102332#{"itemid":["001-102332"]}
[114]
Paolo Ronchi, ‘A, B and C v Ireland: Europe’s Roe v Wade still has to wait’, Law Quarterly Review, no. 127, pp. 365–369, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I3C0F90D09A2711E09D29F4D8A5F97F11/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[115]
Charlesworth, Hilary and Chinkin, C. M., The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis, vol. Melland Schill studies in international law. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.
[116]
Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte, Who believes in human rights?: reflections on the European Convention, vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618192
[117]
‘Women’s Link Worldwide - Women’s Link’s Gender Justice Observatory’. [Online]. Available: http://www.womenslinkworldwide.org/observatory/
[118]
Hugh Collins, ‘* Discrimination, Equality and Social Inclusion’, The Modern Law Review, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 16–43, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097547
[119]
Review by: Nicholas Bamforth, ‘* Conceptions of Anti-Discrimination Law’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 693–716, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3600533
[120]
S. Fredman, ‘* Equality: A New Generation?’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 145–168, Jun. 2001, doi: 10.1093/ilj/30.2.145.
[121]
Fredman, Sandra, Discrimination law, 2nd ed., vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
[122]
‘Article 157 Treaty on the Foundation of the EU (TFEU), formerly Article 141 of the EC Treaty’. European Union, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT
[123]
‘Directive 75/117 EC’. European Union, 1975 [Online]. Available: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/employment_and_social_policy/employment_rights_and_work_organisation/c10905_en.htm
[124]
‘Defrenne v Sabena (No 2) (1976) C-43/75’. European Union, 1976 [Online]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61975CJ0043
[125]
‘Directive 76/207/EEC’. European Union, 1976 [Online]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:31976L0207&qid=1418055475418&from=EN
[126]
‘Directive 2002/73/EC’. European Union, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32002L0073&rid=1
[127]
‘Directive 2006/54/EC’. European Union, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32006L0054&from=EN
[128]
‘Directive 2004/113/EC’. European Union, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:373:0037:0043:EN:PDF
[129]
‘Article 19 TFEU (ex Article 13 EC)’. European Union, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT
[130]
‘Directive 2000/43/EC’. European Union, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32000L0043&from=EN
[131]
‘Directive 2000/78/EC’. European Union, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2000:303:0016:0022:EN:PDF
[132]
‘EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’. European Union, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/charter/index_en.htm
[133]
N. Burrows and M. Robison, ‘An Assessment of the Recast of Community Equality Laws’, European Law Journal, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 186–203, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00363.x.
[134]
A. Masselot, ‘The State of Gender Equality Law in the European Union’, European Law Journal, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 152–168, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00361.x.
[135]
‘Equality Act 2010’. 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents
[136]
‘Case C-249/96, Grant v. South-west Trains Ltd. [1998] ECR I-621’. European Union, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:61996CJ0249&from=EN
[137]
Porcelli v Strathclyde [1986] ICR 564. 1986 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I23B4B0C0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[138]
‘*Bahl v The Law Society & Anor [2004] EWCA Civ 1070’. 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/1070.html
[139]
‘*R v Birmingham CC ex parte EOC [1989] IRLR 173; [1989] AC 1155; 2 WLR 520; 1 All ER 769, HL’, *1155 Birmingham City Council Appellants v Equal Opportunities Commission Respondents. 1989 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I33C34170E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[140]
House of Lords, *James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] ICR 554; [1990] IRLR 288; 2 AC 751; 3 WLR 55; 2 All ER 607, HL. 1990 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICBD48150E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[141]
Industrial Tribunal, Price v Civil Service Commission [1978] IRLR 3. 1978 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I81C21C80E43611DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[142]
Employment Appeal Tribunal, Watches of Switzerland v Savell [1983] IRLR 141. 1983 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA8E35A90E43611DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[143]
‘London Underground v Edwards (No 2) [1999] I.C.R. 494’, *494 London Underground Ltd. v Edwards (No. 2). 1998 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE309AAD0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[144]
European Court of Justice, Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber Von Hartz (170/84) [1986] ECR 1607. 1986 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I748F3250E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[145]
Court of Justice of The European Communities, *Enderby v Frenchay Health Authority (Case C-127/92) [1993] IRLR 591. 1993 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA1777930E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[146]
*R v Secretary of State for Employment ex parte Seymour-Smith and Perez (167/97) [1999] ECR I-623. 1999 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I653D1E60E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[147]
Court of Justice of the European Communities, *Cadman v Health & Safety Executive (Equal Opportunities Commission intervening) (17/05) [2007] IRLR 969. 2007 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I709A06E0880811DB92B1C1B25B24F692/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[148]
McGlynn, Clare, ‘* Reclaiming a Feminist Vision: The Reconciliation of Paid Work and Family Life in European Union Law and Policy’, Columbia Journal of European Law, vol. 7, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/coljeul7&id=247&collection=journals&index=journals/coljeul#247
[149]
Sandra Fredman, ‘* A difference with distinction: pregnancy and parenthood reassessed’, Law Quarterly Review, vol. 110, no. Jan, pp. 106–123, 1994 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICCF9F040E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[150]
Court of Justice of The European Communities, *Dekker (177/88) [1990] ECR I-3941. 1990 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I9639D180E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[151]
‘*Webb v EMO (32/93) [1994] ECR I-3567’. 1994 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF733C1C0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[152]
Court of Justice of The European Communities, *Tele Danmark A/S (109/00) [2001] ECR I-6993. 2001 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICE7BB710E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[153]
‘Directive 92/85 Pregnant Workers Directive’. [Online]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31992L0085:EN:HTML
[154]
‘Directive 2010/18 Parental Leave Directive’. [Online]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:068:0013:0020:EN:PDF
[155]
‘Directive 97/81 Part Time Work Directive’. [Online]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31997L0081:EN:HTML
[156]
C. McCrudden, ‘*Rethinking Positive Action’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 219–243, 1986, doi: 10.1093/ilj/15.1.219.
[157]
L. Barmes, ‘The Diversity Approach to Achieving Equality: Potential and Pitfalls’, Industrial Law Journal, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 274–296, Dec. 2003, doi: 10.1093/ilj/32.4.274.
[158]
N. Burrows and M. Robison, ‘*Positive Action for Women in Employment: Time to Align with Europe?’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 24–41, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00345.x.
[159]
Court of Justice of the European Communities, *Kalanke (450/93) [1995] ECR I-3051. 1995 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID1747A20E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[160]
‘*Marschall v Land Nordrhein Westfalen (409/95) [1997] ECR I-6363’. 1997 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IEEF9D9A0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[161]
Badeck (158/97) [2000] ECR I-1875. 2000 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I6D798971E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[162]
Court of Justice of The European Communities, *Abrahamsson v Fogelqvist (407/98) [2000] ECR I-5539. 2000 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I47B76630E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[163]
‘*Lommers (476/99) [2002] ECR I-2891’. 2002 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IE26FDBD0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[164]
Court of Justice of the European Communities (Second Chamber), *Briheche v Ministre de l’Intérieur (319/03) [2004] ECR I-8807. 2004 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I7A7E3580E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[165]
*Roca Álvarez v Sesa Start España ETT SA (104/09) [2011] 1 CMLR 28. 2011 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I6465D470EC7811DF9E738AE5417A83F5/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[166]
L. Volpp, ‘Feminism versus Multiculturalism’, Columbia Law Review, vol. 101, no. 5, Jun. 2001, doi: 10.2307/1123774.
[167]
Marshall, Jill, ‘Conditions for Freedom - European Human Rights Law and the Islamic Headscarf Debate’, Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 3, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20072862
[168]
H. J. Steiner and Philip, International human rights in context : law, politics, morals : text and materials. 2008 [Online]. Available: http://encore.ulrls.lon.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2991414__SInternational%2520Human%2520Rights%2520in%2520Context%253A%2520law%252C%2520politics%252C%2520morals__Ff%253Afacetlocations%253Aull%253Aull%253ASENATE%2520HOUSE%2520LIBRARY%253A%253A__Orightresult__X4?lang=eng&suite=cobalt
[169]
A. Rao, ‘The Politics of gender and culture in international human rights discourse’, in Women’s rights, human rights: international feminist perspectives, New York: Routledge, 1995.
[170]
J. Marshall, ‘Freedom of Religious Expression and Gender Equality: Sahin v Turkey’, Modern Law Review, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 452–461, May 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00591_1.x.
[171]
Okin, Susan Moller, Cohen, Joshua, Howard, Matthew, and Nussbaum, Martha Craven, Is multiculturalism bad for women? Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7sxzs
[172]
A. F. Bayefsky, ‘General Approaches to Domestic Application of Women’s International Human Rights Law’, in Human rights of women: national and international perspectives, vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994, pp. 351–374 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt3fhxkd.19
[173]
Parekh, Bhikhu C., ‘Conceptualising human beings’, in Rethinking multiculturalism: cultural diversity and political theory, 2nd ed., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14687495240004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[174]
‘Karaduman v Turkey (Application No. 16278/90), 74 Eur. Comm’n. H.R. Dec. & Rep. 93 (1993)’. 1993 [Online]. Available: http://www.strasbourgconsortium.org/common/document.view.php?DocumentID=4237
[175]
‘Dahlab v Switzerland (Application No. 42393/98, ECHR 2001-V)’. 2001 [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-22643#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-22643%22]}
[176]
‘Sahin v Turkey (Application No. 44774/98)’. 2005 [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-70956#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-70956%22]}
[177]
House of Lords, R (Shabina Begum) v Denbigh High School Governors (HL) (2006) UKHL 15. 2006 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=ICEDAD020F83611DAB97BB67935546CF2&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
[178]
‘Law No 2004-228 of March 15, 2004, JO March 17 2004 p 5190 JCP 2004’. 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000417977&dateTexte=&categorieLien=id
[179]
S. K. Araji, ‘Crimes of Honour and Shame: Violence Against Women in Non-Western and Western Societies’, The Red Feather Journal of Postmodern Criminology, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.critcrim.org/redfeather/journal-pomocrim/vol-8-shaming/araji.html
[180]
S. M. Okin, J. Cohen, M. Howard, and M. C. Nussbaum, Is multiculturalism bad for women? Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7sxzs
[181]
R. Coomaraswamy, ‘Identity Within: Cultural Relativism, Minority Rights and the Empowerment of Women’, in Men’s laws, women’s lives: a constitutional perspective on religion, common law, and culture in South Asia, New Delhi: Women Unlimited, 2005.
[182]
S. Mullally, ‘Feminism and Multicultural Dilemmas in India: Revisiting the Shah Bano Case’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 671–692, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1093/ojls/24.4.671.
[183]
H. Siddiqui, ‘“There is no ‘honour’ in domestic violence, only shame!” Women’s struggles against “honour” crimes in the UK’, in ‘Honour’: crimes, paradigms, and violence against women, London: Zed Books, 2005.
[184]
A. A. An-Na’im, ‘State Responsibility under International Human Rights Law to Change Religious and Customary Laws’, in Human rights of women: national and international perspectives, vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994, pp. 167–188 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt3fhxkd.11
[185]
J. Marshall, ‘Chapter 7’, in Humanity, freedom and feminism, vol. Applied legal philosophy, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.
[186]
Copelon, Rhonda, ‘Gender Crimes as War Crimes: Integrating Crimes against Women into International Criminal Law’, McGill Law Journal, vol. 46, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mcgil46&id=227&collection=journals&index=
[187]
P. Viseur Sellers, ‘Individual(s) Liability for Collective Sexual Violence’, in Gender and human rights, vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199260911.001.0001
[188]
K. D. Askin, ‘Gender Crimes Jurisprudence in the ICTR: Positive Developments’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1007–1018, Aug. 2005, doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqi061.
[189]
C. Chinkin, ‘Rape and Sexual Abuse of Women in International Law’, European Journal of International Law, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 326–341, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://ejil.oxfordjournals.org/content/5/1/326.citation
[190]
Chesterman, Simon, ‘Never Again . . . and Again: Law, Order, and the Gender of War Crimes in Bosnia and Beyond’, Yale Journal of International Law, vol. 22, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjil22&id=309&collection=journals&index=
