2.
Lacey, Nicola: * Introduction to the Essays. In: Unspeakable subjects: feminist essays in legal and social theory. Hart, Oxford (1998). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472561916.
3.
Munro, V.: * Chapter 1. In: Law and politics at the perimeter: re-evaluating key debates in feminist theory. Hart, Oxford (2007).
4.
Joanne Conaghan: Reassessing the Feminist Theoretical Project in Law. Journal of Law and Society. 27, 351–385 (2000).
5.
Review by: Nicola Lacey: Feminist Legal Theory. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 9, 383–394 (1989).
6.
MacKinnon, C.: Chapter 13: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence. In: Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1989).
7.
Freeman, Michael D. A., Lloyd of Hampstead, Dennis Lloyd: Chapter on Feminist Jurisprudence. In: Lloyd’s introduction to jurisprudence. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2008).
8.
Scales, A.: The Emergence of Feminist Jurisprudence: An Essay. In: Feminist jurisprudence. Oxford University Press, New York (1993).
9.
Halley, Janet E.: Split decisions: how and why to take a break from feminism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (2008).
10.
Marshall, Jill: Part 1. In: Humanity, freedom and feminism. Ashgate, Aldershot (2005).
11.
Munro, Vanessa: * Chapter 6: Equality, Respect and feminist Futures. In: Law and politics at the perimeter: re-evaluating key debates in feminist theory. Hart, Oxford (2007).
12.
MacKinnon, Catharine A.: * Chapter 2: Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination. In: Feminism unmodified: discourses on life and law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1987).
13.
Hunter, Rosemary C.: * Chapter 1: Introduction: Feminism and Equality. In: Rethinking equality projects in law: feminist challenges. Hart Publishing, Oxford (2008).
14.
Birgit Christensen and Andrew F. Smith: Equality and Justice: Remarks on a Necessary Relationship. Hypatia. 20, 155–163 (2005).
15.
Christine A. Littleton: Reconstructing Sexual Equality. California Law Review. 75, 1279–1337 (1987).
16.
Cornell, Drucilla: At the heart of freedom: feminism, sex, and equality. Princeton University Press, Princton, N.J (1998).
17.
Young, Iris Marion: Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J (1990).
18.
Crenshaw, Kimberle: *Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum. 1989, (1989).
19.
Jennifer C. Nash: *re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review. 1–15 (2008).
20.
Kimberle Crenshaw: Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review. 43, 1241–1299 (1991).
21.
Yuval-Davis, N.: Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 13, 193–209 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752.
22.
Yoshida, K.: Towards Intersectionality in the European Court of Human Rights: The Case of B.S. v Spain. Feminist Legal Studies. 21, 195–204 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-013-9241-1.
23.
Conaghan, J.: Intersectionality and the Feminist Project in Law. In: Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Location. Taylor and Francis, Hoboken (2008).
24.
Conaghan, J.: Intersectionality and the Feminist Project in Law. In: Intersectionality and beyond. Routledge-Cavendish, Abingdon, Oxon (2009).
25.
Munro, V.: * Chapter 3: On Reform and Reforming Rights. In: Law and politics at the perimeter: re-evaluating key debates in feminist theory. Hart, Oxford (2007).
26.
Nedelsky, Jennifer: * Reconceiving Rights as Relationship. Review of Constitutional Studies. 1, (1993).
27.
Nussbaum, Martha Craven: * Chapters 1 and 2. In: Sex & social justice. Oxford University Press, New York (1999).
28.
Lacey, N.: * Chapter 1: From Individual to Group? A Feminist Analysis of the Limits of Anti-Discrimination Legislation. In: Unspeakable subjects: feminist essays in legal and social theory. pp. 19–45. Hart, Oxford (1998). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472561916.ch-001.
29.
Smart, C.: * Chapters 1 and 7. In: Feminism and the power of law. Routledge, London (1989).
30.
MacKinnon, Catharine A.: Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1989).
31.
MacKinnon, Catharine A.: Women’s lives, men’s laws. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (2004). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1pdrpw3?locatt=mode:legacy.
32.
Gilligan, C.: In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjk2wr9?locatt=mode:legacy.
33.
Irigaray, Luce, Montin, Karin: Thinking the difference: for a peaceful revolution. Athlone, London (1994).
34.
Pateman, Carole: The sexual contract. Polity, Cambridge (1988).
35.
Young, Iris Marion: Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J (1990).
36.
Cornell, Drucilla: At the heart of freedom: feminism, sex, and equality. Princeton University Press, Princton, N.J (1998).
37.
Robin West: Jurisprudence and Gender. The University of Chicago Law Review. 55, 1–72 (1988).
38.
Beauvoir, Simone de, Borde, Constance, Malovany-Chevallier, Sheila: The second sex. Vintage, New York (2011).
39.
Williams, Patricia J.: The alchemy of race and rights. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1991).
40.
Halley, Janet E.: Split decisions: how and why to take a break from feminism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (2008).
41.
Smart, C.: Feminism and the power of law. Routledge, London (1989).
42.
Anthias, F., Yuval-Davis, N., Cain, H.: Racialized boundaries: race, nation, gender, colour and class and the anti-racist struggle. Routledge, London (1992).
43.
Robson, R.: Sappho goes to law school: fragments in lesbian legal theory. Columbia University Press, New York (1998).
44.
Okin, S.M.: Justice, gender, and the family. Basic Books, New York (1989).
45.
Mill, J.S.: The subjection of women. Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer, London (1869).
46.
Butler, J.: Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge, New York (2006).
47.
Nancy Fraser, Axel Honneth: Redistribution or Recognition? Verso.
48.
Moran, Leslie J.: *Judicial Diversity and the Challenge of Sexuality: Some Preliminary Findings. Sydney Law Review. 28, (2006).
49.
Hunter, R., McGlynn, C., Rackley, E.: *Chapter 1. Feminist Judgments: An Introduction. In: Feminist judgments: from theory to practice. Hart, Oxford (2010).
50.
Hunter, R.: *Chapter 2. An Account of Feminist Judging. In: Feminist judgments: from theory to practice. Hart, Oxford (2010).
51.
Rackley, E.: Women, judging and the judiciary: from difference to diversity. Routledge, Abingdon (2013).
52.
Diduck, A.: * Shifting Familiarity. Current Legal Problems. 58, 235–254 (2005).
53.
Olsen, F.: * The Family and the Market: A Study of Ideology and Legal Reform. In: Feminist jurisprudence. Oxford University Press, New York (1993).
54.
Carol Smart: * The Legal and Moral Ordering of Child Custody. Journal of Law and Society. 18, 485–500 (1991).
55.
Collier, R.: *A Hard Time to Be a Father?: Reassessing the Relationship Between Law, Policy, and Family (Practices). Journal of Law and Society. 28, 520–545 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00201.
56.
Stychin, C.: Chapter 2: Family Friendly? Rights, Responsibilities and Relationship Recognition. In: Feminist perspectives on family law. Routledge-Cavendish, Abingdon (2006).
57.
Diduck, Alison, Kaganas, Felicity: Chapter 1. In: Family law, gender and the state. Hart, Oxford (2012).
58.
Cossman, B.: Family Feuds: Neo-Liberal and Neo-Conservative Visions of the Re-Privatization Project. In: Privatization, law, and the challenge to feminism. pp. 169–217. University of Toronto Press, Toronto (2002).
59.
Fineman, Martha: The autonomy myth: a theory of dependency. New Press, New York (2004).
60.
Davidoff, Leonore: The family story: blood, contract and intimacy, 1830-1960. Longman, London (1999).
61.
Barlow, A., Duncan, S., Edwards, R.: Chapter 5: New Labour, the rationality mistake and family policy in Britain. In: Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. Routledge, London (2002).
62.
Lewis, J.: Chapter 3.1: Individualisation, assumptions about the existence of an adult worker model and the shift towards contractualism. In: Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. Routledge, London (2002).
63.
Lees, S.: Chapter 3. In: Carnal knowledge: rape on trial. Women’s Press, London (2002).
64.
Friedman, J., Valenti, J.: Chapter 1 & 2. In: Yes means yes!: visions of female sexual power & a world without rape. Seal Press, Berkeley, Calif (2008).
65.
MacKinnon, C.A.: Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1989).
66.
Deming, M.E., Covan, E.K., Swan, S.C., Billings, D.L.: Exploring Rape Myths, Gendered Norms, Group Processing, and the Social Context of Rape Among College Women: A Qualitative Analysis. Violence Against Women. 19, 465–485 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213487044.
67.
Horvath, M., Brown, J.: Rape: challenging contemporary thinking. Routledge, London (2013).
68.
Munro, V.E.: Concerning Consent: Standards of Permissibility in Sexual Relations. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 25, 335–352 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi017.
69.
KELLY, L., LOVETT, J., REGAN, L.: A Gap or a Chasm? Attrition in Reported Rape Cases, http://www.apho.org.uk/resource/item.aspx?RID=78107, (2005).
70.
Temkin, J.: Rape and the legal process. Oxford University Press, New York (2002).
71.
Nicola Gavey: Just Sex? Routledge.
72.
McGregor, J.: Is it rape?: on acquaintance rape and taking women’s consent seriously. Ashgate, Aldershot (2005).
73.
Munsch, C.L., Willer, R.: The Role of Gender Identity Threat in Perceptions of Date Rape and Sexual Coercion. Violence Against Women. 18, 1125–1146 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801212465151.
74.
Aronowitz, A.A.: Chapters 1 & 2. In: Human trafficking, human misery: the global trade in human beings. Scarecrow Press, Lanham, Maryland (2013).
75.
Masika, R., Oxfam: Gender, trafficking, and slavery. Oxfam, Oxford (2002).
76.
Kempadoo, K., Doezema, J.: Global sex workers: rights, resistance, and redefinition. Routledge, New York (1998).
77.
Jeffreys, S.: Chapters 6 & 7. In: The industrial vagina: the political economy of the global sex trade. Routledge, London (2009).
78.
CASE OF RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-96549#{"itemid":["001-96549"]}, (2010).
79.
Cameron, S., Newman, E.: Trafficking in humans: social, cultural and political dimensions. United Nations University Press, Tokyo (2008).
80.
Chandran, P.: Human trafficking handbook: recognising trafficking and modern-day slavery in the UK. LexisNexis, London (2011).
81.
Doezema, J.: Sex slaves and discourse masters: the construction of trafficking. Zed, London (2010).
82.
Gallagher, A.T.: The international law of human trafficking. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
83.
Guild, E., Minderhoud, P.E.: Immigration and criminal law in the European Union: the legal measures and social consequences of criminal law in member states on trafficking and smuggling in human beings. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden (2006). https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004150645.i-425.
84.
Morris, E.G.: Second class migrants?: gender and migration in the European Union : explaining gender (in)equality in EU immigration, asylum, and trafficking policymaking. VDM, Saarbrücken (2009).
85.
Shelley, L.I.: Human trafficking: a global perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760433.
86.
Holtmaat, R.: *The CEDAW: A Holistic Approach to Women’s Equality and Freedom. In: Women’s human rights: CEDAW in international, regional, and national law. pp. 95–124. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013).
87.
Fredman, S.: *The Role of Equality and Non-Discrimination Laws in Women’s Economic Participation, Formal and Informal, http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Women/WGWomen/Pages/ESL.aspx, (2013).
88.
Lacey, N.: Feminist Legal Theory and The Rights of Women. In: Gender and human rights. pp. 13–57. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004).
89.
Byrnes, A.: The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. In: The human rights of women: international instruments and African experiences. pp. 119–173. Zed Books in association with World University Service, London (2002).
90.
Walsh, D.M.: Women’s rights in democratizing states: just debate and gender justice in the public sphere. Cambridge University Press, New York (2011).
91.
Brems, E.: Protecting the Human Rights of Women. In: International human rights in the 21st century: protecting the rights of groups. pp. 100–141. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham (2003).
92.
Charlesworth, H.: What are "Women’s International Human Rights?”. In: Human rights of women: national and international perspectives. pp. 58–85. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia (1994).
93.
Reilly, N.: Women’s human rights: seeking gender justice in a globalizing age. Polity, Cambridge (2009).
94.
Grimshaw et al., P.: Chapter 3. In: Women’s rights and human rights: international historical perspectives. Palgrave, Basingstoke (2001).
95.
Cusack, Simone: CEDAW and the Rights to Non-Discrimination and Equality. Melbourne Journal of International Law. 14, (2013).
96.
General Recommendation No. 25, on article 4, paragraph 1, of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, on temporary special measures, Paras 6and 7, http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/recommendations/, (2004).
97.
General Recommendation No. 28, on the core obligations of States parties under article 2 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/comments.htm, (2001).
98.
Hilary Charlesworth, Christine Chinkin and Shelley Wright: * Feminist Approaches to International Law. The American Journal of International Law. 85, 613–645 (1991).
99.
Radacic, I.: * Gender Equality Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law. 19, 841–857 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn044.
100.
*Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-57416#{"itemid":["001-57416"]}, (1985).
101.
*Stec and others v. the United Kingdom, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-73198#{"itemid":["001-73198"]}, (2006).
102.
*Leyla Sahin v Turkey, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-70956#{"itemid":["001-70956"]}, (2005).
103.
Marshall, Jill: *Conditions for Freedom - European Human Rights Law and the Islamic Headscarf Debate. Human Rights Quarterly. 30, 631–654 (2008).
104.
Langlaude, S.: *Indoctrination, Secularism, Religious Liberty, and the ECHR. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 55, 929–944 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei135.
105.
McGlynn, C.: *RAPE, TORTURE AND THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 58, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589309001195.
106.
Ivana Radacic: * Rape cases in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: defining rape and determining the scope of the state’s obligations. European Human Rights Law Review. 357–375 (2008).
107.
Shazia Choudhry and Jonathan Herring: * Domestic violence and the Human Rights Act 1998: a new means of legal intervention? Public Law. 752–784 (2006).
108.
Jill Marshall: * A right to personal autonomy at the European Court of Human Rights. European Human Rights Law Review. 337–356 (2008).
109.
*Brüggemann and Scheuten v The Federal Republic of Germany, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-74824#{"itemid":["001-74824"]}, (1977).
110.
*Vo v France, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-61887#{"itemid":["001-61887"]}, (2004).
111.
*Tysiac v Poland, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-79812#{"itemid":["001-79812"]}, (2007).
112.
*D v Ireland, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-76233#{"itemid":["001-76233"]}, (2006).
113.
*A, B and C v Ireland, http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-102332#{"itemid":["001-102332"]}, (2010).
114.
Paolo Ronchi: A, B and C v Ireland: Europe’s Roe v Wade still has to wait. Law Quarterly Review. 365–369 (2011).
115.
Charlesworth, Hilary, Chinkin, C. M.: The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2000).
116.
Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte: Who believes in human rights?: reflections on the European Convention. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006).
117.
Women’s Link Worldwide - Women’s Link’s Gender Justice Observatory, http://www.womenslinkworldwide.org/observatory/.
118.
Hugh Collins: * Discrimination, Equality and Social Inclusion. The Modern Law Review. 66, 16–43 (2003).
119.
Review by: Nicholas Bamforth: * Conceptions of Anti-Discrimination Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 24, 693–716 (2004).
120.
Fredman, S.: * Equality: A New Generation? Industrial Law Journal. 30, 145–168 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/30.2.145.
121.
Fredman, Sandra: Discrimination law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).
122.
Article 157 Treaty on the Foundation of the EU (TFEU), formerly Article 141 of the EC Treaty, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT, (2012).
123.
Directive 75/117 EC, http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/employment_and_social_policy/employment_rights_and_work_organisation/c10905_en.htm, (1975).
124.
Defrenne v Sabena (No 2) (1976) C-43/75, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61975CJ0043, (1976).
125.
Directive 76/207/EEC, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:31976L0207&qid=1418055475418&from=EN, (1976).
126.
Directive 2002/73/EC, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32002L0073&rid=1, (2002).
127.
Directive 2006/54/EC, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32006L0054&from=EN, (2006).
128.
Directive 2004/113/EC, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:373:0037:0043:EN:PDF, (2004).
129.
Article 19 TFEU (ex Article 13 EC), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT, (2012).
130.
Directive 2000/43/EC, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32000L0043&from=EN, (2000).
131.
Directive 2000/78/EC, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2000:303:0016:0022:EN:PDF, (2000).
132.
EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/charter/index_en.htm, (2000).
133.
Burrows, N., Robison, M.: An Assessment of the Recast of Community Equality Laws. European Law Journal. 13, 186–203 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00363.x.
134.
Masselot, A.: The State of Gender Equality Law in the European Union. European Law Journal. 13, 152–168 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00361.x.
135.
Equality Act 2010, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents, (2010).
136.
Case C-249/96, Grant v. South-west Trains Ltd. [1998] ECR I-621, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:61996CJ0249&from=EN, (1998).
137.
Porcelli v Strathclyde [1986] ICR 564. (1986).
138.
*Bahl v The Law Society & Anor [2004] EWCA Civ 1070, http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/1070.html, (2004).
139.
*R v Birmingham CC ex parte EOC [1989] IRLR 173; [1989] AC 1155; 2 WLR 520; 1 All ER 769, HL, https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I33C34170E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true, (1989).
140.
House of Lords: *James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] ICR 554; [1990] IRLR 288; 2 AC 751; 3 WLR 55; 2 All ER 607, HL. (1990).
141.
Industrial Tribunal: Price v Civil Service Commission [1978] IRLR 3. (1978).
142.
Employment Appeal Tribunal: Watches of Switzerland v Savell [1983] IRLR 141. (1983).
143.
London Underground v Edwards (No 2) [1999] I.C.R. 494, https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE309AAD0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true, (1998).
144.
European Court of Justice: Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber Von Hartz (170/84) [1986] ECR 1607. (1986).
145.
Court of Justice of The European Communities: *Enderby v Frenchay Health Authority (Case C-127/92) [1993] IRLR 591. (1993).
146.
*R v Secretary of State for Employment ex parte Seymour-Smith and Perez (167/97) [1999] ECR I-623. (1999).
147.
Court of Justice of the European Communities: *Cadman v Health & Safety Executive (Equal Opportunities Commission intervening) (17/05) [2007] IRLR 969. (2007).
148.
McGlynn, Clare: * Reclaiming a Feminist Vision: The Reconciliation of Paid Work and Family Life in European Union Law and Policy. Columbia Journal of European Law. 7, (2001).
149.
Sandra Fredman: * A difference with distinction: pregnancy and parenthood reassessed. Law Quarterly Review. 110, 106–123 (1994).
150.
Court of Justice of The European Communities: *Dekker (177/88) [1990] ECR I-3941. (1990).
151.
*Webb v EMO (32/93) [1994] ECR I-3567, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF733C1C0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth, (1994).
152.
Court of Justice of The European Communities: *Tele Danmark A/S (109/00) [2001] ECR I-6993. (2001).
153.
Directive 92/85 Pregnant Workers Directive, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31992L0085:EN:HTML.
154.
Directive 2010/18 Parental Leave Directive, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:068:0013:0020:EN:PDF.
155.
Directive 97/81 Part Time Work Directive, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31997L0081:EN:HTML.
156.
McCrudden, C.: *Rethinking Positive Action. Industrial Law Journal. 15, 219–243 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/15.1.219.
157.
Barmes, L.: The Diversity Approach to Achieving Equality: Potential and Pitfalls. Industrial Law Journal. 32, 274–296 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/32.4.274.
158.
Burrows, N., Robison, M.: *Positive Action for Women in Employment: Time to Align with Europe? Journal of Law and Society. 33, 24–41 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00345.x.
159.
Court of Justice of the European Communities: *Kalanke (450/93) [1995] ECR I-3051. (1995).
160.
*Marschall v Land Nordrhein Westfalen (409/95) [1997] ECR I-6363, https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IEEF9D9A0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true, (1997).
161.
Badeck (158/97) [2000] ECR I-1875. (2000).
162.
Court of Justice of The European Communities: *Abrahamsson v Fogelqvist (407/98) [2000] ECR I-5539. (2000).
163.
*Lommers (476/99) [2002] ECR I-2891, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IE26FDBD0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth, (2002).
164.
Court of Justice of the European Communities (Second Chamber): *Briheche v Ministre de l’Intérieur (319/03) [2004] ECR I-8807. (2004).
165.
*Roca Álvarez v Sesa Start España ETT SA (104/09) [2011] 1 CMLR 28. (2011).
166.
Volpp, L.: Feminism versus Multiculturalism. Columbia Law Review. 101, (2001). https://doi.org/10.2307/1123774.
167.
Marshall, Jill: Conditions for Freedom - European Human Rights Law and the Islamic Headscarf Debate. Human Rights Quarterly. 30, (2008).
168.
Steiner, H.J., Philip: International human rights in context : law, politics, morals : text and materials. (2008).
169.
Rao, A.: The Politics of gender and culture in international human rights discourse. In: Women’s rights, human rights: international feminist perspectives. Routledge, New York (1995).
170.
Marshall, J.: Freedom of Religious Expression and Gender Equality: Sahin v Turkey. Modern Law Review. 69, 452–461 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00591_1.x.
171.
Okin, Susan Moller, Cohen, Joshua, Howard, Matthew, Nussbaum, Martha Craven: Is multiculturalism bad for women? Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1999).
172.
Bayefsky, A.F.: General Approaches to Domestic Application of Women’s International Human Rights Law. In: Human rights of women: national and international perspectives. pp. 351–374. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia (1994).
173.
Parekh, Bhikhu C.: Conceptualising human beings. In: Rethinking multiculturalism: cultural diversity and political theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2006).
174.
Karaduman v Turkey (Application No. 16278/90), 74 Eur. Comm’n. H.R. Dec. & Rep. 93 (1993), http://www.strasbourgconsortium.org/common/document.view.php?DocumentID=4237, (1993).
175.
Dahlab v Switzerland (Application No. 42393/98, ECHR 2001-V), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-22643#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-22643%22]}, (2001).
176.
Sahin v Turkey (Application No. 44774/98), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-70956#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-70956%22]}, (2005).
177.
House of Lords: R (Shabina Begum) v Denbigh High School Governors (HL) (2006) UKHL 15. (2006).
178.
Law No 2004-228 of March 15, 2004, JO March 17 2004 p 5190 JCP 2004, http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000417977&dateTexte=&categorieLien=id, (2004).
179.
Araji, S.K.: Crimes of Honour and Shame: Violence Against Women in Non-Western and Western Societies. The Red Feather Journal of Postmodern Criminology. (2000).
180.
Okin, S.M., Cohen, J., Howard, M., Nussbaum, M.C.: Is multiculturalism bad for women? Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1999).
181.
Coomaraswamy, R.: Identity Within: Cultural Relativism, Minority Rights and the Empowerment of Women. In: Men’s laws, women’s lives: a constitutional perspective on religion, common law, and culture in South Asia. Women Unlimited, New Delhi (2005).
182.
Mullally, S.: Feminism and Multicultural Dilemmas in India: Revisiting the Shah Bano Case. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 24, 671–692 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/24.4.671.
183.
Siddiqui, H.: ‘There is no “honour” in domestic violence, only shame!’ Women’s struggles against ‘honour’ crimes in the UK. In: ‘Honour’: crimes, paradigms, and violence against women. Zed Books, London (2005).
184.
An-Na’im, A.A.: State Responsibility under International Human Rights Law to Change Religious and Customary Laws. In: Human rights of women: national and international perspectives. pp. 167–188. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia (1994).
185.
Marshall, J.: Chapter 7. In: Humanity, freedom and feminism. Ashgate, Aldershot (2005).
186.
Copelon, Rhonda: Gender Crimes as War Crimes: Integrating Crimes against Women into International Criminal Law. McGill Law Journal. 46, (2000).
187.
Viseur Sellers, P.: Individual(s) Liability for Collective Sexual Violence. In: Gender and human rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004).
188.
Askin, K.D.: Gender Crimes Jurisprudence in the ICTR: Positive Developments. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 3, 1007–1018 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqi061.
189.
Chinkin, C.: Rape and Sexual Abuse of Women in International Law. European Journal of International Law. 5, 326–341 (1994).
190.
Chesterman, Simon: Never Again . . . and Again: Law, Order, and the Gender of War Crimes in Bosnia and Beyond. Yale Journal of International Law. 22, (1997).
