1
Arnoldi J. Risk: an introduction. Cambridge: : Polity 2009.
2
Gigerenzer G. Risk savvy: how to make good decisions. New York: : Viking 2014.
3
Lupton D. Risk. Second edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781135090326
4
Burgess A, Alemanno A, Zinn J. Routledge Handbook of Risk Studies. Florence: : Taylor and Francis 2016.
5
Bammer G, Smithson M. Uncertainty and risk: multidisciplinary perspectives. London: : Earthscan 2008.
6
Ulrich Beck. Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: : Sage 1992.
7
Jasanoff S. Designs on nature: science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2005.
8
Nowotny H. The cunning of uncertainty. Cambridge: : Polity 2016.
9
Slovic P. The perception of risk. London: : Earthscan 2000.
10
Gilberto C. Gallopin, Silvio Funtowicz, Martin O’Connor, et al. Science for the Twenty-First Century: From Social Contract to the Scientific Core. International Social Science Journal 2001;53:219–29. doi:10.1111/1468-2451.00311
11
Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, et al. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: : SAGE Publications 1994. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1024114
12
J.R. Ravetz. What is Post-Normal Science. Futures:The journal of policy, planning and futures studies 1999;31:647–53. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00024-5
13
Jerome R Ravetz, Ziauddin Sardar. Rethinking science. Futures:The journal of policy, planning and futures studies 1997;29:467–70. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(97)00023-2
14
Deborah Dixon, Harriet Hawkins, Mrill Ingram. Art: Blurring the boundaries. Nature 2011;472:417–417. doi:10.1038/472417a
15
C. J. Fearnley, W. J. McGuire, G. Davies, et al. Standardisation of the USGS Volcano Alert Level System (VALS): analysis and ramifications. Bulletin of Volcanology 2012;74:2023–36. doi:10.1007/s00445-012-0645-6
16
Carolina Garcia, Carina J. Fearnley. Evaluating critical links in early warning systems for natural hazards. Environmental Hazards 2012;11:123–37. doi:10.1080/17477891.2011.609877
17
Bruno, Latour. On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt 1996;47:369–81.https://www.jstor.org/stable/40878163
18
Mileti DS. Disasters by design: a reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Washington, D.C.: : Joseph Henry Press 1999.
19
Vaughan D, American Council of Learned Societies. The Challenger launch decision: risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.01159
20
Day S, Fearnley C. A classification of mitigation strategies for natural hazards: implications for the understanding of interactions between mitigation strategies. Natural Hazards 2015;79:1219–38. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1899-z
21
D. Jamieson. Scientific Uncertainty and the Political Process. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1996;545:35–43. doi:10.1177/0002716296545001004
22
D. J. Spiegelhalter, H. Riesch. Don’t know, can’t know: embracing deeper uncertainties when analysing risks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2011;369:4730–50. doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0163
23
Andrew, Stirling. Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. Talking point on the precautionary principle. EMBO reports 2007;8:309–15. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400953
24
Stirling A. Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. Talking point on the precautionary principle. EMBO reports 2007;8:309–15. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400953
25
Douglas M, Wildavsky AB. Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1982. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt7zw3mr
26
Thomas F. Gieryn. Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review 1983;48:781–95.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095325
27
Knight FH. Risk, uncertainty and profit. London: : Forgotten Books 2015.
28
Mayo DG. Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1996. https://www.vlebooks.com/Vleweb/Product/Index/467948?page=0
29
Wisner B, editor. At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. Second edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203714775
30
N. Pidgeon, M. O’Leary. Man-made disasters: why technology and organizations (sometimes) fail. Safety Science 2000;34:15–30. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00004-7
31
Mitchell M. Complexity: a guided tour. New York: : Oxford University Press 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/UCL/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=472328
32
H. Nowotny. The Increase of Complexity and its Reduction: Emergent Interfaces between the Natural Sciences, Humanities and Social Sciences. Theory, Culture & Society 2005;22:15–31. doi:10.1177/0263276405057189
33
Ziauddin Sardar, Jerome R. Ravetz. Complexity: Fad or future? Futures 1994;26:563–7. doi:10.1016/0016-3287(94)90028-0
34
Taylor PJ. Unruly complexity: ecology, interpretation, engagement. Chicago, [Ill.]: : University of Chicago Press 2005. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780226790398
35
J. Urry. The Complexity Turn. Theory, Culture & Society 2005;22:1–14. doi:10.1177/0263276405057188
36
Peter, Adey, Ben, Anderson. Event and anticipation: UK Civil Contingencies and the space – times of decision. Environment and Planning A 2011;43:2878–99. doi:10.1068/a43576
37
J. Burgess, A. Stirling, J. Clark, et al. Deliberative mapping: a novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisions. Public Understanding of Science 2007;16:299–322. doi:10.1177/0963662507077510
38
Jasanoff S. Designs on nature: science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2005. https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/j.ctt7spkz
39
Paul, Slovic, Baruch, Fischhoff, Sarah, Lichtenstein. Why Study Risk Perception? Risk Analysis 1982;2:83–93. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1982.tb01369.x
40
Michael S. Carolan. Science, Expertise, and the Democratization of the Decision-Making Process. Society & Natural Resources 2006;19:661–8. doi:10.1080/08941920600742443
41
H.M. Collins, Robert, Evans. The Third Wave of Science Studies. Social Studies of Science 2002;32:235–96. doi:10.1177/0306312702032002003
42
Jasanoff S. States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. London: : Routledge 2004.
43
Lash S, Szerszynski B, Wynne B. Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology. London: : Sage 1996. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1023984
44
G. A. Bradshaw, Jeffrey G. Borchers. Uncertainty as Information: Narrowing the Science-policy Gap. Conservation Ecology 2000;4. doi:10.5751/ES-00174-040107
45
John R. Durant, Geoffrey A. Evans, Geoffrey P. Thomas. The public understanding of science. Nature 1989;340:11–4. doi:10.1038/340011a0
46
Culture, Media, Language. Abingdon, UK: : Taylor & Francis 1980. doi:10.4324/9780203381182
47
G. Rowe. A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values 2005;30:251–90. doi:10.1177/0162243904271724
48
S. Shackley, B. Wynne. Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority. Science, Technology & Human Values 1996;21:275–302. doi:10.1177/016224399602100302
49
Deborah Trumbull et al. Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project. Science education;84:265–75.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2%3C265::AID-SCE7%3E3.0.CO;2-5/abstract
50
J. Burgess, A. Stirling, J. Clark, et al. Deliberative mapping: a novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisions. Public Understanding of Science 2007;16:299–322. doi:10.1177/0963662507077510
51
Shane J. Cronin, David R. Gaylord, Douglas Charley, et al. Participatory methods of incorporating scientific with traditional knowledge for volcanic hazard management on Ambae Island, Vanuatu. Bulletin of Volcanology 2004;66:652–68. doi:10.1007/s00445-004-0347-9
52
George E. Marcus. Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 1995;24:95–117.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155931
53
Andrea J. Nightingale. A Feminist in the Forest: Situated Knowledges and Mixing Methods in Natural Resource Management. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 2003;2:77–90.http://hdl.handle.net/1842/1405