Bibliography for HPSCGA49: Science Policy in an Era of Risk and Uncertainty BETA

1.

Arnoldi, J.: Risk: an introduction. Polity, Cambridge (2009).

2.

Gigerenzer, G.: Risk savvy: how to make good decisions. Viking, New York (2014).

3.

Lupton, D.: Risk. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (2013).

4.

Burgess, A., Alemanno, A., Zinn, J.: Routledge Handbook of Risk Studies. Taylor and Francis, Florence (2016).

5.

Bammer, G., Smithson, M.: Uncertainty and risk: multidisciplinary perspectives. Earthscan, London (2008).

6.

Ulrich Beck: Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, London (1992).

7.

Jasanoff, S.: Designs on nature: science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (2005).

8.

Nowotny, H.: The cunning of uncertainty. Polity, Cambridge (2016).

9.

Slovic, P.: The perception of risk. Earthscan, London (2000).

10.

Gilberto C. Gallopin, Silvio Funtowicz, Martin O’Connor, Jerry Ravetz: Science for the Twenty-First Century: From Social Contract to the Scientific Core. International Social Science Journal. 53, 219–229 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00311.

11.

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M.A.: The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. SAGE Publications, London (1994).

12.

J.R. Ravetz: What is Post-Normal Science. Futures:The journal of policy, planning and futures studies. 31, 647–653 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00024-5.

13.

Jerome R Ravetz, Ziauddin Sardar: Rethinking science. Futures:The journal of policy, planning and futures studies. 29, 467–470 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(97)00023-2.

14.

Deborah Dixon, Harriet Hawkins, Mrill Ingram: Art: Blurring the boundaries. Nature. 472, 417–417 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/472417a.

15.

C. J. Fearnley, W. J. McGuire, G. Davies, J. Twigg: Standardisation of the USGS Volcano Alert Level System (VALS): analysis and ramifications. Bulletin of Volcanology. 74, 2023–2036 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-012-0645-6.

16.

Carolina Garcia, Carina J. Fearnley: Evaluating critical links in early warning systems for natural hazards. Environmental Hazards. 11, 123–137 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2011.609877.

17.

Bruno, Latour: On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt. 47, 369–381 (1996).

18.

Mileti, D.S.: Disasters by design: a reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, D.C. (1999).

19.

Vaughan, D., American Council of Learned Societies: The Challenger launch decision: risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1996).

20.

Day, S., Fearnley, C.: A classification of mitigation strategies for natural hazards: implications for the understanding of interactions between mitigation strategies. Natural Hazards. 79, 1219–1238 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1899-z.

21.

D. Jamieson: Scientific Uncertainty and the Political Process. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 545, 35–43 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716296545001004.

22.

D. J. Spiegelhalter, H. Riesch: Don’t know, can’t know: embracing deeper uncertainties when analysing risks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 369, 4730–4750 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0163.

23.

Andrew, Stirling: Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. Talking point on the precautionary principle. EMBO reports. 8, 309–315 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400953.

24.

Stirling, A.: Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. Talking point on the precautionary principle. EMBO reports. 8, 309–315 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400953.

25.

Douglas, M., Wildavsky, A.B.: Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley (1982).

26.

Thomas F. Gieryn: Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review. 48, 781–795 (1983).

27.

Knight, F.H.: Risk, uncertainty and profit. Forgotten Books, London (2015).

28.

Mayo, D.G.: Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1996).

29.

Wisner, B. ed: At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (2014).

30.

N. Pidgeon, M. O’Leary: Man-made disasters: why technology and organizations (sometimes) fail. Safety Science. 34, 15–30 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00004-7.

31.

Mitchell, M.: Complexity: a guided tour. Oxford University Press, New York (2009).

32.

H. Nowotny: The Increase of Complexity and its Reduction: Emergent Interfaces between the Natural Sciences, Humanities and Social Sciences. Theory, Culture & Society. 22, 15–31 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405057189.

33.

Ziauddin Sardar, Jerome R. Ravetz: Complexity: Fad or future? Futures. 26, 563–567 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(94)90028-0.

34.

Taylor, P.J.: Unruly complexity: ecology, interpretation, engagement. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, [Ill.] (2005).

35.

J. Urry: The Complexity Turn. Theory, Culture & Society. 22, 1–14 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405057188.

36.

Peter, Adey, Ben, Anderson: Event and anticipation: UK Civil Contingencies and the space – times of decision. Environment and Planning A. 43, 2878–2899 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1068/a43576.

37.

J. Burgess, A. Stirling, J. Clark, G. Davies, M. Eames, K. Staley, S. Williamson: Deliberative mapping: a novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisions. Public Understanding of Science. 16, 299–322 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507077510.

38.

Jasanoff, S.: Designs on nature: science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (2005).

39.

Paul, Slovic, Baruch, Fischhoff, Sarah, Lichtenstein: Why Study Risk Perception? Risk Analysis. 2, 83–93 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1982.tb01369.x.

40.

Michael S. Carolan: Science, Expertise, and the Democratization of the Decision-Making Process. Society & Natural Resources. 19, 661–668 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920600742443.

41.

H.M. Collins, Robert, Evans: The Third Wave of Science Studies. Social Studies of Science. 32, 235–296 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032002003.

42.

Jasanoff, S.: States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. Routledge, London (2004).

43.

Lash, S., Szerszynski, B., Wynne, B.: Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology. Sage, London (1996).

44.

G. A. Bradshaw, Jeffrey G. Borchers: Uncertainty as Information: Narrowing the Science-policy Gap. Conservation Ecology. 4, (2000). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00174-040107.

45.

John R. Durant, Geoffrey A. Evans, Geoffrey P. Thomas: The public understanding of science. Nature. 340, 11–14 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/340011a0.

46.

Culture, Media, Language. Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, UK (1980). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203381182.

47.

G. Rowe: A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values. 30, 251–290 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904271724.

48.

S. Shackley, B. Wynne: Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority. Science, Technology & Human Values. 21, 275–302 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399602100302.

49.

Deborah Trumbull et al.: Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project. Science education. 84, 265–275.

50.

J. Burgess, A. Stirling, J. Clark, G. Davies, M. Eames, K. Staley, S. Williamson: Deliberative mapping: a novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisions. Public Understanding of Science. 16, 299–322 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507077510.

51.

Shane J. Cronin, David R. Gaylord, Douglas Charley, Brent V. Alloway, Sandrine Wallez, Job W. Esau: Participatory methods of incorporating scientific with traditional knowledge for volcanic hazard management on Ambae Island, Vanuatu. Bulletin of Volcanology. 66, 652–668 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-004-0347-9.

52.

George E. Marcus: Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology. 24, 95–117 (1995).

53.

Andrea J. Nightingale: A Feminist in the Forest: Situated Knowledges and Mixing Methods in Natural Resource Management. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies. 2, 77–90 (2003).