Andrea J. Nightingale. ‘A Feminist in the Forest: Situated Knowledges and Mixing Methods in Natural Resource Management’. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 2.1 (2003): 77–90. Web. <http://hdl.handle.net/1842/1405>.
Andrew, Stirling. ‘Risk, Precaution and Science: Towards a More Constructive Policy Debate. Talking Point on the Precautionary Principle’. EMBO reports 8.4 (2007): 309–315. Web. <https://www.embopress.org/toc/14693178/2007/8/4>.
Arnoldi, Jakob. Risk: An Introduction. Key concepts. Cambridge: Polity, 2009. Print.
Bammer, Gabriele, and Michael Smithson. Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Earthscan risk in society series. London: Earthscan, 2008. Print.
Bruno, Latour. ‘On Actor-Network Theory: A Few Clarifications’. Soziale Welt 47.4 (1996): 369–381. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/40878163>.
Burgess, Adam, Alberto Alemanno, and Jens Zinn. Routledge Handbook of Risk Studies. Florence: Taylor and Francis, 2016. Print.
C. J. Fearnley et al. ‘Standardisation of the USGS Volcano Alert Level System (VALS): Analysis and Ramifications’. Bulletin of Volcanology 74.9 (2012): 2023–2036. Web. <https://link.springer.com/journal/445/volumes-and-issues/74-9>.
Carolina Garcia and Carina J. Fearnley. ‘Evaluating Critical Links in Early Warning Systems for Natural Hazards’. Environmental Hazards 11.2 (2012): 123–137. Web. <https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tenh20/11/2>.
Culture, Media, Language. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis, 1980. Web. <http://www.tandfebooks.com/action/showBook?doi=10.4324/9780203381182>.
D. J. Spiegelhalter and H. Riesch. ‘Don’t Know, Can’t Know: Embracing Deeper Uncertainties When Analysing Risks’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 369.1956 (2011): 4730–4750. Web. <https://royalsocietypublishing.org/toc/rsta/2011/369/1956>.
D. Jamieson. ‘Scientific Uncertainty and the Political Process’. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 545.1 (1996): 35–43. Web. <https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/anna/545/1>.
Day, Simon, and Carina Fearnley. ‘A Classification of Mitigation Strategies for Natural Hazards: Implications for the Understanding of Interactions between Mitigation Strategies’. Natural Hazards 79.2 (2015): 1219–1238. Web.
Deborah Dixon, Harriet Hawkins, and Mrill Ingram. ‘Art: Blurring the Boundaries’. Nature 472.7344 (2011): 417–417. Web. <https://www.nature.com/>.
Deborah Trumbull et al. ‘Thinking Scientifically during Participation in a Citizen-Science Project’. Science education 84.2 265–275. Web. <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2%3C265::AID-SCE7%3E3.0.CO;2-5/abstract>.
Douglas, Mary, and Aaron B. Wildavsky. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt7zw3mr>.
G. A. Bradshaw and Jeffrey G. Borchers. ‘Uncertainty as Information: Narrowing the Science-Policy Gap’. Conservation Ecology 4.1 (2000): n. pag. Web. <https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol4/iss1/>.
G. Rowe. ‘A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms’. Science, Technology & Human Values 30.2 (2005): 251–290. Web. <https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/sthd/30/2>.
George E. Marcus. ‘Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography’. Annual Review of Anthropology 24 (1995): 95–117. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155931>.
Gibbons, Michael et al. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE Publications, 1994. Web. <http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1024114>.
Gigerenzer, Gerd. Risk Savvy: How to Make Good Decisions. New York: Viking, 2014. Print.
Gilberto C. Gallopin et al. ‘Science for the Twenty-First Century: From Social Contract to the Scientific Core’. International Social Science Journal 53.168 (2001): 219–229. Web. <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14682451/2001/53/168>.
H. Nowotny. ‘The Increase of Complexity and Its Reduction: Emergent Interfaces between the Natural Sciences, Humanities and Social Sciences’. Theory, Culture & Society 22.5 (2005): 15–31. Web. <https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/tcsa/22/5>.
H.M. Collins and Robert, Evans. ‘The Third Wave of Science Studies’. Social Studies of Science 32.2 (2002): 235–296. Web. <https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/sssb/32/2>.
J. Burgess et al. ‘Deliberative Mapping: A Novel Analytic-Deliberative Methodology to Support Contested Science-Policy Decisions’. Public Understanding of Science 16.3 (2007): 299–322. Web. <https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/pusa/16/3>.
---. ‘Deliberative Mapping: A Novel Analytic-Deliberative Methodology to Support Contested Science-Policy Decisions’. Public Understanding of Science 16.3 (2007): 299–322. Web. <https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/pusa/16/3>.
J. Urry. ‘The Complexity Turn’. Theory, Culture & Society 22.5 (2005): 1–14. Web. <https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/tcsa/22/5>.
Jasanoff, Sheila. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2005. Print.
---. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2005. Web. <https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/j.ctt7spkz>.
---. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. International library of sociology. London: Routledge, 2004. Print.
Jerome R Ravetz and Ziauddin Sardar. ‘Rethinking Science’. Futures:The journal of policy, planning and futures studies 29.6 (1997): 467–470. Web. <https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/futures/vol/29/issue/6>.
John R. Durant, Geoffrey A. Evans, and Geoffrey P. Thomas. ‘The Public Understanding of Science’. Nature 340.6228 (1989): 11–14. Web. <https://www.nature.com/>.
J.R. Ravetz. ‘What Is Post-Normal Science’. Futures:The journal of policy, planning and futures studies 31.7 (1999): 647–653. Web. <https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/futures/vol/31/issue/7>.
Knight, Frank H. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Classic reprint series. London: Forgotten Books, 2015. Print.
Lash, Scott, Bronislaw Szerszynski, and Brian Wynne. Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. Theory, culture&society. London: Sage, 1996. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1023984>.
Lupton, Deborah. Risk. Second edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2013. Web. <https://doi.org/10.4324/9781135090326>.
Mayo, Deborah G. Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Science and its conceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/Vleweb/Product/Index/467948?page=0>.
Michael S. Carolan. ‘Science, Expertise, and the Democratization of the Decision-Making Process’. Society & Natural Resources 19.7 (2006): 661–668. Web. <https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/usnr20/19/7>.
Mileti, Dennis S. Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States. Natural hazards and disasters. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press, 1999. Print.
Mitchell, Melanie. Complexity: A Guided Tour. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/UCL/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=472328>.
N. Pidgeon and M. O’Leary. ‘Man-Made Disasters: Why Technology and Organizations (Sometimes) Fail’. Safety Science 34.1 (2000): 15–30. Web. <https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/safety-science/vol/34/issue/1>.
Nowotny, Helga. The Cunning of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity, 2016. Print.
Paul, Slovic, Baruch, Fischhoff, and Sarah, Lichtenstein. ‘Why Study Risk Perception?’ Risk Analysis 2.2 (1982): 83–93. Web. <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15396924/1982/2/2>.
Peter, Adey and Ben, Anderson. ‘Event and Anticipation: UK Civil Contingencies and the Space – Times of Decision’. Environment and Planning A 43.12 (2011): 2878–2899. Web. <https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/epna/43/12>.
S. Shackley and B. Wynne. ‘Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority’. Science, Technology & Human Values 21.3 (1996): 275–302. Web. <https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/sthd/21/3>.
Shane J. Cronin et al. ‘Participatory Methods of Incorporating Scientific with Traditional Knowledge for Volcanic Hazard Management on Ambae Island, Vanuatu’. Bulletin of Volcanology 66.7 (2004): 652–668. Web. <https://link.springer.com/journal/445/volumes-and-issues/66-7>.
Slovic, Paul. The Perception of Risk. Risk, society, and policy series. London: Earthscan, 2000. Print.
Stirling, Andrew. ‘Risk, Precaution and Science: Towards a More Constructive Policy Debate. Talking Point on the Precautionary Principle’. EMBO reports 8.4 (2007): 309–315. Web.
Taylor, Peter J. Unruly Complexity: Ecology, Interpretation, Engagement. Chicago, [Ill.]: University of Chicago Press, 2005. Web. <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780226790398>.
Thomas F. Gieryn. ‘Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists’. American Sociological Review 48.6 (1983): 781–795. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095325>.
Ulrich Beck. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Theory, culture&society. London: Sage, 1992. Print.
Vaughan, Diane and American Council of Learned Societies. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996. Web. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.01159>.
Wisner, Ben, ed. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters. Second edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2014. Web. <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203714775>.
Ziauddin Sardar and Jerome R. Ravetz. ‘Complexity: Fad or Future?’ Futures 26.6 (1994): 563–567. Web. <https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/futures/vol/26/issue/6>.
