1.
Arnoldi J. Risk: An Introduction. Vol Key concepts. Polity; 2009.
2.
Gigerenzer G. Risk Savvy: How to Make Good Decisions. Viking; 2014.
3.
Lupton D. Risk. Second edition. Routledge; 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781135090326
4.
Burgess A, Alemanno A, Zinn J. Routledge Handbook of Risk Studies. Taylor and Francis; 2016.
5.
Bammer G, Smithson M. Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Vol Earthscan risk in society series. Earthscan; 2008.
6.
Ulrich Beck. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Vol Theory, culture&society. Sage; 1992.
7.
Jasanoff S. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press; 2005.
8.
Nowotny H. The Cunning of Uncertainty. Polity; 2016.
9.
Slovic P. The Perception of Risk. Vol Risk, society, and policy series. Earthscan; 2000.
10.
Gilberto C. Gallopin, Silvio Funtowicz, Martin O’Connor, Jerry Ravetz. Science for the Twenty-First Century: From Social Contract to the Scientific Core. International Social Science Journal. 2001;53(168):219-229. doi:10.1111/1468-2451.00311
11.
Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow MA. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. SAGE Publications; 1994. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1024114
12.
J.R. Ravetz. What is Post-Normal Science. Futures:The journal of policy, planning and futures studies. 1999;31(7):647-653. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00024-5
13.
Jerome R Ravetz, Ziauddin Sardar. Rethinking science. Futures:The journal of policy, planning and futures studies. 1997;29(6):467-470. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(97)00023-2
14.
Deborah Dixon, Harriet Hawkins, Mrill Ingram. Art: Blurring the boundaries. Nature. 2011;472(7344):417-417. doi:10.1038/472417a
15.
C. J. Fearnley, W. J. McGuire, G. Davies, J. Twigg. Standardisation of the USGS Volcano Alert Level System (VALS): analysis and ramifications. Bulletin of Volcanology. 2012;74(9):2023-2036. doi:10.1007/s00445-012-0645-6
16.
Carolina Garcia, Carina J. Fearnley. Evaluating critical links in early warning systems for natural hazards. Environmental Hazards. 2012;11(2):123-137. doi:10.1080/17477891.2011.609877
17.
Bruno, Latour. On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt. 1996;47(4):369-381. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40878163
18.
Mileti DS. Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States. Vol Natural hazards and disasters. Joseph Henry Press; 1999.
19.
Vaughan D, American Council of Learned Societies. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. University of Chicago Press; 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.01159
20.
Day S, Fearnley C. A classification of mitigation strategies for natural hazards: implications for the understanding of interactions between mitigation strategies. Natural Hazards. 2015;79(2):1219-1238. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1899-z
21.
D. Jamieson. Scientific Uncertainty and the Political Process. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1996;545(1):35-43. doi:10.1177/0002716296545001004
22.
D. J. Spiegelhalter, H. Riesch. Don’t know, can’t know: embracing deeper uncertainties when analysing risks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2011;369(1956):4730-4750. doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0163
23.
Andrew, Stirling. Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. Talking point on the precautionary principle. EMBO reports. 2007;8(4):309-315. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400953
24.
Stirling A. Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. Talking point on the precautionary principle. EMBO reports. 2007;8(4):309-315. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400953
25.
Douglas M, Wildavsky AB. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. University of California Press; 1982. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt7zw3mr
26.
Thomas F. Gieryn. Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review. 1983;48(6):781-795. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095325
27.
Knight FH. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Vol Classic reprint series. Forgotten Books; 2015.
28.
Mayo DG. Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Vol Science and its conceptual foundations. University of Chicago Press; 1996. https://www.vlebooks.com/Vleweb/Product/Index/467948?page=0
29.
Wisner B, ed. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters. Second edition. Routledge; 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203714775
30.
N. Pidgeon, M. O’Leary. Man-made disasters: why technology and organizations (sometimes) fail. Safety Science. 2000;34(1):15-30. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00004-7
31.
Mitchell M. Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford University Press; 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/UCL/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=472328
32.
H. Nowotny. The Increase of Complexity and its Reduction: Emergent Interfaces between the Natural Sciences, Humanities and Social Sciences. Theory, Culture & Society. 2005;22(5):15-31. doi:10.1177/0263276405057189
33.
Ziauddin Sardar, Jerome R. Ravetz. Complexity: Fad or future? Futures. 1994;26(6):563-567. doi:10.1016/0016-3287(94)90028-0
34.
Taylor PJ. Unruly Complexity: Ecology, Interpretation, Engagement. University of Chicago Press; 2005. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780226790398
35.
J. Urry. The Complexity Turn. Theory, Culture & Society. 2005;22(5):1-14. doi:10.1177/0263276405057188
36.
Peter, Adey, Ben, Anderson. Event and anticipation: UK Civil Contingencies and the space – times of decision. Environment and Planning A. 2011;43(12):2878-2899. doi:10.1068/a43576
37.
J. Burgess, A. Stirling, J. Clark, et al. Deliberative mapping: a novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisions. Public Understanding of Science. 2007;16(3):299-322. doi:10.1177/0963662507077510
38.
Jasanoff S. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press; 2005. https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/j.ctt7spkz
39.
Paul, Slovic, Baruch, Fischhoff, Sarah, Lichtenstein. Why Study Risk Perception? Risk Analysis. 1982;2(2):83-93. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1982.tb01369.x
40.
Michael S. Carolan. Science, Expertise, and the Democratization of the Decision-Making Process. Society & Natural Resources. 2006;19(7):661-668. doi:10.1080/08941920600742443
41.
H.M. Collins, Robert, Evans. The Third Wave of Science Studies. Social Studies of Science. 2002;32(2):235-296. doi:10.1177/0306312702032002003
42.
Jasanoff S. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Vol International library of sociology. Routledge; 2004.
43.
Lash S, Szerszynski B, Wynne B. Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. Vol Theory, culture&society. Sage; 1996. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1023984
44.
G. A. Bradshaw, Jeffrey G. Borchers. Uncertainty as Information: Narrowing the Science-policy Gap. Conservation Ecology. 2000;4(1). doi:10.5751/ES-00174-040107
45.
John R. Durant, Geoffrey A. Evans, Geoffrey P. Thomas. The public understanding of science. Nature. 1989;340(6228):11-14. doi:10.1038/340011a0
46.
Culture, Media, Language. Taylor & Francis; 1980. doi:10.4324/9780203381182
47.
G. Rowe. A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values. 2005;30(2):251-290. doi:10.1177/0162243904271724
48.
S. Shackley, B. Wynne. Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority. Science, Technology & Human Values. 1996;21(3):275-302. doi:10.1177/016224399602100302
49.
Deborah Trumbull et al. Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project. Science education. 84(2):265-275. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2%3C265::AID-SCE7%3E3.0.CO;2-5/abstract
50.
J. Burgess, A. Stirling, J. Clark, et al. Deliberative mapping: a novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisions. Public Understanding of Science. 2007;16(3):299-322. doi:10.1177/0963662507077510
51.
Shane J. Cronin, David R. Gaylord, Douglas Charley, Brent V. Alloway, Sandrine Wallez, Job W. Esau. Participatory methods of incorporating scientific with traditional knowledge for volcanic hazard management on Ambae Island, Vanuatu. Bulletin of Volcanology. 2004;66(7):652-668. doi:10.1007/s00445-004-0347-9
52.
George E. Marcus. Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1995;24:95-117. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155931
53.
Andrea J. Nightingale. A Feminist in the Forest: Situated Knowledges and Mixing Methods in Natural Resource Management. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies. 2003;2(1):77-90. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/1405