Andrea J. Nightingale, ‘A Feminist in the Forest: Situated Knowledges and Mixing Methods in Natural Resource Management’ (2003) 2 ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 77 <http://hdl.handle.net/1842/1405>
Andrew, Stirling, ‘Risk, Precaution and Science: Towards a More Constructive Policy Debate. Talking Point on the Precautionary Principle’ (2007) 8 EMBO reports 309 <https://www.embopress.org/toc/14693178/2007/8/4>
Arnoldi J, Risk: An Introduction, vol Key concepts (Polity 2009)
Bammer G and Smithson M, Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, vol Earthscan risk in society series (Earthscan 2008)
Bruno, Latour, ‘On Actor-Network Theory: A Few Clarifications’ (1996) 47 Soziale Welt 369 <https://www.jstor.org/stable/40878163>
Burgess A, Alemanno A and Zinn J, Routledge Handbook of Risk Studies (Taylor and Francis 2016)
C. J. Fearnley and others, ‘Standardisation of the USGS Volcano Alert Level System (VALS): Analysis and Ramifications’ (2012) 74 Bulletin of Volcanology 2023 <https://link.springer.com/journal/445/volumes-and-issues/74-9>
Carolina Garcia and Carina J. Fearnley, ‘Evaluating Critical Links in Early Warning Systems for Natural Hazards’ (2012) 11 Environmental Hazards 123 <https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tenh20/11/2>
Culture, Media, Language (Taylor & Francis 1980) <http://www.tandfebooks.com/action/showBook?doi=10.4324/9780203381182>
D. J. Spiegelhalter and H. Riesch, ‘Don’t Know, Can’t Know: Embracing Deeper Uncertainties When Analysing Risks’ (2011) 369 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 4730 <https://royalsocietypublishing.org/toc/rsta/2011/369/1956>
D. Jamieson, ‘Scientific Uncertainty and the Political Process’ (1996) 545 The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 35 <https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/anna/545/1>
Day S and Fearnley C, ‘A Classification of Mitigation Strategies for Natural Hazards: Implications for the Understanding of Interactions between Mitigation Strategies’ (2015) 79 Natural Hazards 1219
Deborah Dixon, Harriet Hawkins, and Mrill Ingram, ‘Art: Blurring the Boundaries’ (2011) 472 Nature 417 <https://www.nature.com/>
Deborah Trumbull et al., ‘Thinking Scientifically during Participation in a Citizen-Science Project’ 84 Science education 265 <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2%3C265::AID-SCE7%3E3.0.CO;2-5/abstract>
Douglas M and Wildavsky AB, Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers (University of California Press 1982) <https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt7zw3mr>
G. A. Bradshaw and Jeffrey G. Borchers, ‘Uncertainty as Information: Narrowing the Science-Policy Gap’ (2000) 4 Conservation Ecology <https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol4/iss1/>
G. Rowe, ‘A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms’ (2005) 30 Science, Technology & Human Values 251 <https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/sthd/30/2>
George E. Marcus, ‘Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography’ (1995) 24 Annual Review of Anthropology 95 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155931>
Gibbons M and others, The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (SAGE Publications 1994) <http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1024114>
Gigerenzer G, Risk Savvy: How to Make Good Decisions (Viking 2014)
Gilberto C. Gallopin and others, ‘Science for the Twenty-First Century: From Social Contract to the Scientific Core’ (2001) 53 International Social Science Journal 219 <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14682451/2001/53/168>
H. Nowotny, ‘The Increase of Complexity and Its Reduction: Emergent Interfaces between the Natural Sciences, Humanities and Social Sciences’ (2005) 22 Theory, Culture & Society 15 <https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/tcsa/22/5>
H.M. Collins and Robert, Evans, ‘The Third Wave of Science Studies’ (2002) 32 Social Studies of Science 235 <https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/sssb/32/2>
J. Burgess and others, ‘Deliberative Mapping: A Novel Analytic-Deliberative Methodology to Support Contested Science-Policy Decisions’ (2007) 16 Public Understanding of Science 299 <https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/pusa/16/3>
——, ‘Deliberative Mapping: A Novel Analytic-Deliberative Methodology to Support Contested Science-Policy Decisions’ (2007) 16 Public Understanding of Science 299 <https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/pusa/16/3>
J. Urry, ‘The Complexity Turn’ (2005) 22 Theory, Culture & Society 1 <https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/tcsa/22/5>
Jasanoff S, States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, vol International library of sociology (Routledge 2004)
——, Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States (Princeton University Press 2005)
——, Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States (Princeton University Press 2005) <https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/j.ctt7spkz>
Jerome R Ravetz and Ziauddin Sardar, ‘Rethinking Science’ (1997) 29 Futures:The journal of policy, planning and futures studies 467 <https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/futures/vol/29/issue/6>
John R. Durant, Geoffrey A. Evans, and Geoffrey P. Thomas, ‘The Public Understanding of Science’ (1989) 340 Nature 11 <https://www.nature.com/>
J.R. Ravetz, ‘What Is Post-Normal Science’ (1999) 31 Futures:The journal of policy, planning and futures studies 647 <https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/futures/vol/31/issue/7>
Knight FH, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, vol Classic reprint series (Forgotten Books 2015)
Lash S, Szerszynski B and Wynne B, Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, vol Theory, culture&society (Sage 1996) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1023984>
Lupton D, Risk (Second edition, Routledge 2013) <https://doi.org/10.4324/9781135090326>
Mayo DG, Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge, vol Science and its conceptual foundations (University of Chicago Press 1996) <https://www.vlebooks.com/Vleweb/Product/Index/467948?page=0>
Michael S. Carolan, ‘Science, Expertise, and the Democratization of the Decision-Making Process’ (2006) 19 Society & Natural Resources 661 <https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/usnr20/19/7>
Mileti DS, Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States, vol Natural hazards and disasters (Joseph Henry Press 1999)
Mitchell M, Complexity: A Guided Tour (Oxford University Press 2009) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/UCL/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=472328>
N. Pidgeon and M. O’Leary, ‘Man-Made Disasters: Why Technology and Organizations (Sometimes) Fail’ (2000) 34 Safety Science 15 <https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/safety-science/vol/34/issue/1>
Nowotny H, The Cunning of Uncertainty (Polity 2016)
Paul, Slovic, Baruch, Fischhoff, and Sarah, Lichtenstein, ‘Why Study Risk Perception?’ (1982) 2 Risk Analysis 83 <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15396924/1982/2/2>
Peter, Adey and Ben, Anderson, ‘Event and Anticipation: UK Civil Contingencies and the Space – Times of Decision’ (2011) 43 Environment and Planning A 2878 <https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/epna/43/12>
S. Shackley and B. Wynne, ‘Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority’ (1996) 21 Science, Technology & Human Values 275 <https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/sthd/21/3>
Shane J. Cronin and others, ‘Participatory Methods of Incorporating Scientific with Traditional Knowledge for Volcanic Hazard Management on Ambae Island, Vanuatu’ (2004) 66 Bulletin of Volcanology 652 <https://link.springer.com/journal/445/volumes-and-issues/66-7>
Slovic P, The Perception of Risk, vol Risk, society, and policy series (Earthscan 2000)
Stirling A, ‘Risk, Precaution and Science: Towards a More Constructive Policy Debate. Talking Point on the Precautionary Principle’ (2007) 8 EMBO reports 309
Taylor PJ, Unruly Complexity: Ecology, Interpretation, Engagement (University of Chicago Press 2005) <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780226790398>
Thomas F. Gieryn, ‘Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists’ (1983) 48 American Sociological Review 781 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095325>
Ulrich Beck, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, vol Theory, culture&society (Sage 1992)
Vaughan D and American Council of Learned Societies, The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA (University of Chicago Press 1996) <http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.01159>
Wisner B (ed), At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters (Second edition, Routledge 2014) <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203714775>
Ziauddin Sardar and Jerome R. Ravetz, ‘Complexity: Fad or Future?’ (1994) 26 Futures 563 <https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/futures/vol/26/issue/6>
