1
van der Vleuten CPM, Driessen EW. What would happen to education if we take education evidence seriously? Perspectives on Medical Education 2014;3:222–32. doi:10.1007/s40037-014-0129-9
2
Crotty M. The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. London: : SAGE 1998. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1099439&site=ehost-live&scope=site
3
Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. The Lancet 2010;376:1923–58. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5
4
Hodges BD, Kuper A. Theory and Practice in the Design and Conduct of Graduate Medical Education. Academic Medicine 2012;87:25–33. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318238e069
5
Newman M. Ch.4: Critical appraisal I: is the quality of the study good enough for you to use the findings? In: The evidence-based practice manual for nurses. Edinburgh: : Churchill Livingstone 2002. 86–113.
6
Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, et al. Quality in qualitative evaluation : a framework for assessing research evidence. 2003.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=UCL_IOE_DERA_DS21069&context=L&vid=UCL_VU2&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&tab=local&lang=en_US
7
Swanwick T, Buckley G. Introduction: Understanding Medical Education. Chapter. In: Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2010. http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781444320299
8
McManus I. Student selection - Chapter. In: A practical guide for medical teachers. Edinburgh: : Elsevier 2009.
9
Patterson F, Ferguson E. Selection for Medical Education and Training - Chapter. In: Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2010. 352–65.http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781444320299
10
Bowles N. Methods of nurse selection: a review. Nursing standard 1995;9:25–9.
11
Cadman C, Brewer J. Emotional intelligence: a vital prerequisite for recruitment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Management 2001;9:321–4. doi:10.1046/j.0966-0429.2001.00261.x
12
Value of admission interviews in selecting of undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Nursing Management 2000;8:101–6. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2834.2000.00155.x
13
Ferguson E. Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature. BMJ 2002;324:952–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7343.952
14
Jefferis T. Selection for specialist training: what can we learn from other countries? BMJ 2007;334:1302–4. doi:10.1136/bmj.39238.447338.AD
15
Matthews G, Deary IJ. Personality traits. Cambridge, UK: : Cambridge University Press 1998. http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3710646750004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760
16
Daniels K, Macdonald LAC. Equality, diversity and discrimination: a student text. London: : Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development 2005.
17
Patterson F, Lane P, Ferguson E, et al. Competency-based selection system for general practitioner registrars. BMJ Career Focus 2001;323.https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjhiPro34vWAhUoI8AKHSPDCd4QFgg9MAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fgprecruitment.hee.nhs.uk%2FLinkClick.aspx%3Ffileticket%3DdVJN7iH4B50%253D%26portalid%3D8&usg=AFQjCNGPMb675vLPRZMn--PFbMwspi3vyA
18
The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: Practical and Theoretical Implications of 85 Years of Research Findings. Psychological Bulletin;124.http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00006823-199809000-00006&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
19
Park S, Khan NF, Hampshire M, et al. A BEME systematic review of UK undergraduate medical education in the general practice setting: BEME Guide No. 32. Medical Teacher 2015;37:611–30. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1032918
20
Thistlethwaite J. Interprofessional education: a review of context, learning and the research agenda. Medical Education 2012;46:58–70. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04143.x
21
Freeth D. Interprofessional Education; Chapter 9. In: Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2010. 53–68.http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781444320299
22
Sargeant J. Theories to aid understanding and implementation of interprofessional education. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 2009;29:178–84. doi:10.1002/chp.20033
23
Shaw R. Idenityfing and Synthesising Qualitative Literature. Chapter 2 in Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy. In: Harper D, Thompson AR, eds. Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy. Chichester, UK: : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2012. doi:10.1002/9781119973249
24
Gough D, Thomas J. Commonality and diversity in reviews. Chapter 3. In: An introduction to systematic reviews. Los Angeles: : Sage 2012.
25
Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Synthesising Qualitative Research Findings: Qualitative Metasynthesis. Chapter 7. In: Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Springer Publishing Company 2007.
26
Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, Calif: : SAGE 1988. http://SRMO.sagepub.com/view/meta-ethnography/SAGE.xml
27
Simulation-Based Medical Education: An Ethical Imperative. Academic Medicine;78:783–8.http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00001888-200308000-00006&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
28
Dieckmann P, Krage R. Simulation and psychology. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology 2013;26:714–20. doi:10.1097/ACO.0000000000000018
29
Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Hatala R, et al. Reconsidering Fidelity in Simulation-Based Training. Academic Medicine 2014;89:387–92. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000130
30
Fenwick TJ, Edwards R, Sawchuk PH. Emerging approaches in educational research: tracing the sociomaterial. London: : Routledge 2011.
31
Miles A. Complexity in medicine and healthcare: people and systems, theory and practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2009;15:409–10. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01204.x
32
Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, et al. Simulation in healthcare education: A best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Medical Teacher 2013;35:e1511–30. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632
33
McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, et al. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003â2009. Medical Education 2010;44:50–63. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x
34
Brown J, Noble LM, Papageorgiou A, et al., editors. Clinical Communication in Medicine. Chichester, UK: : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015. doi:10.1002/9781118728130
35
Marrying Content and Process in Clinical Method Teaching: Enhancing the Calgary–Cambridge Guides. Academic Medicine;78:802–9.http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00001888-200308000-00011&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
36
Cunningham B, Andrews D, Ball SJ, et al. Exploring Professionalism. London: : Institute of Education Press 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1047850
37
Toward a Normative Definition of Medical Professionalism. Academic Medicine;75:612–6.http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00001888-200006000-00010&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
38
Freidson E. Professionalism: the third logic. Oxford: : Wiley 2013. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4029681
39
Rashid A, Siriwardena N. The professionalism of education and educators in postgraduate medicine. Education for Primary Care 2005;16:235–45.
40
David Halpin and Alex Moore. EDUCATIONAL PROFESSIONALISM IN AN AGE OF UNCERTAINTY: THE EMERGENCE OF ‘ECLECTIC & PRAGMATIC’ TEACHER IDENTITIES. Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Studies 2006;38:119–40.https://www.jstor.org/stable/43294506?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
41
MacDonald K. Sociological Analysis of the Professions Chapter 1. In: The sociology of the professions. London: : Sage 1995.
42
Barnett R. Critical Professionalism; Chapter 10. In: Higher education: a critical business. Buckingham: : Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press 1997.
43
Freidson E. Profession of medicine: a study of the sociology of applied knowledge. New York: : Dodd, Mead & Company 1970.
44
Yvonna S. Lincoln Egon G Guba. Naturalistic inquiry / Yvonna S. Lincoln, Egon G. Guba.
45
Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
46
Bunniss S, Kelly DR. Research paradigms in medical education research. Medical Education 2010;44:358–66. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03611.x
47
Pope C, Mays N. Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ 1995;311:42–5. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6996.42
48
Louis Cohen, Lawrence Manion And Keith Morrison ; With Contributions From Richard Bell, Stewart Martin, Gary McCulloch And Carmel O’Sullivan. Research Methods in Education. Routledge Ltd - M.U.A. 7AD. https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780203720967
49
How to read a paper | The BMJ. http://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-readers/publications/how-read-paper
