1.
van der Vleuten CPM, Driessen EW. What would happen to education if we take education evidence seriously? Perspectives on Medical Education. 2014 Jun;3(3):222–232.
2.
Crotty M. The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process [Internet]. London: SAGE; 1998. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1099439&site=ehost-live&scope=site
3.
Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, Fineberg H, Garcia P, Ke Y, Kelley P, Kistnasamy B, Meleis A, Naylor D, Pablos-Mendez A, Reddy S, Scrimshaw S, Sepulveda J, Serwadda D, Zurayk H. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. The Lancet. 2010 Dec;376(9756):1923–1958.
4.
Hodges BD, Kuper A. Theory and Practice in the Design and Conduct of Graduate Medical Education. Academic Medicine [Internet]. 2012 Jan;87(1):25–33. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/fulltext/2012/01000/Theory_and_Practice_in_the_Design_and_Conduct_of.13.aspx
5.
Newman M. Ch.4: Critical appraisal I: is the quality of the study good enough for you to use the findings? The evidence-based practice manual for nurses. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. p. 86–113.
6.
Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, Dillon L. Quality in qualitative evaluation : a framework for assessing research evidence [Internet]. Government Chief Social Researcher’s Office, Cabinet Office; 2003. Available from: https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=UCL_IOE_DERA_DS21069&context=L&vid=UCL_VU2&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&tab=local&lang=en_US
7.
Swanwick T, Buckley G. Introduction: Understanding Medical Education. Chapter. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice [Internet]. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. Available from: http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781444320299
8.
McManus I. Student selection - Chapter. A practical guide for medical teachers. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2009.
9.
Patterson F, Ferguson E. Selection for Medical Education and Training - Chapter. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice [Internet]. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 352–365. Available from: http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781444320299
10.
Bowles N. Methods of nurse selection: a review. Nursing standard. Harrow, Middx: Scutari Projects Ltd; 1995;9(15):25–29.
11.
Cadman C, Brewer J. Emotional intelligence: a vital prerequisite for recruitment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Management. 2001 Nov;9(6):321–324.
12.
Value of admission interviews in selecting of undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Nursing Management. 2000 Mar;8(2):101–106.
13.
Ferguson E. Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature. BMJ. 2002 Apr 20;324(7343):952–957.
14.
Jefferis T. Selection for specialist training: what can we learn from other countries? BMJ. 2007 Jun 23;334(7607):1302–1304.
15.
Matthews G, Deary IJ. Personality traits [Internet]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1998. Available from: http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3710646750004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760
16.
Daniels K, Macdonald LAC. Equality, diversity and discrimination: a student text. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development; 2005.
17.
Patterson F, Lane P, Ferguson E, Norfolk T. Competency-based selection system for general practitioner registrars. BMJ Career Focus [Internet]. 2001;323(7311). Available from: https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjhiPro34vWAhUoI8AKHSPDCd4QFgg9MAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fgprecruitment.hee.nhs.uk%2FLinkClick.aspx%3Ffileticket%3DdVJN7iH4B50%253D%26portalid%3D8&usg=AFQjCNGPMb675vLPRZMn--PFbMwspi3vyA
18.
The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: Practical and Theoretical Implications of 85 Years of Research Findings. Psychological Bulletin [Internet]. 124(2). Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00006823-199809000-00006&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
19.
Park S, Khan NF, Hampshire M, Knox R, Malpass A, Thomas J, Anagnostelis B, Newman M, Bower P, Rosenthal J, Murray E, Iliffe S, Heneghan C, Band A, Georgieva Z. A BEME systematic review of UK undergraduate medical education in the general practice setting: BEME Guide No. 32. Medical Teacher. 2015 Jul 3;37(7):611–630.
20.
Thistlethwaite J. Interprofessional education: a review of context, learning and the research agenda. Medical Education. 2012 Jan;46(1):58–70.
21.
Freeth D. Interprofessional Education; Chapter 9. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice [Internet]. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 53–68. Available from: http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781444320299
22.
Sargeant J. Theories to aid understanding and implementation of interprofessional education. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2009 Summer;29(3):178–184.
23.
Shaw R. Idenityfing and Synthesising Qualitative Literature. Chapter 2 in Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy. In: Harper D, Thompson AR, editors. Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy [Internet]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2012. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9781119973249
24.
Gough D, Thomas J. Commonality and diversity in reviews. Chapter 3. An introduction to systematic reviews. Los Angeles: Sage; 2012.
25.
Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Synthesising Qualitative Research Findings: Qualitative Metasynthesis. Chapter 7. Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Springer Publishing Company; 2007.
26.
Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies [Internet]. Newbury Park, Calif: SAGE; 1988. Available from: http://SRMO.sagepub.com/view/meta-ethnography/SAGE.xml
27.
Simulation-Based Medical Education: An Ethical Imperative. Academic Medicine [Internet]. 78(8):783–788. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00001888-200308000-00006&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
28.
Dieckmann P, Krage R. Simulation and psychology. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2013 Dec;26(6):714–720.
29.
Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Hatala R, Zendejas B, Cook DA. Reconsidering Fidelity in Simulation-Based Training. Academic Medicine. 2014 Mar;89(3):387–392.
30.
Fenwick TJ, Edwards R, Sawchuk PH. Emerging approaches in educational research: tracing the sociomaterial. London: Routledge; 2011.
31.
Miles A. Complexity in medicine and healthcare: people and systems, theory and practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2009 Jun;15(3):409–410.
32.
Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, Sullivan JE, Issenberg SB. Simulation in healthcare education: A best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Medical Teacher. 2013 Oct;35(10):e1511–e1530.
33.
McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003â2009. Medical Education. 2010 Jan;44(1):50–63.
34.
Brown J, Noble LM, Papageorgiou A, Kidd J, editors. Clinical Communication in Medicine [Internet]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2015. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9781118728130
35.
Marrying Content and Process in Clinical Method Teaching: Enhancing the Calgary–Cambridge Guides. Academic Medicine [Internet]. 78(8):802–809. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00001888-200308000-00011&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
36.
Cunningham B, Andrews D, Ball SJ, Barnett R, Burke PJ, Crook D, Edwards C, Lunt I, Morley L, Power S, Whitty G. Exploring Professionalism [Internet]. London: Institute of Education Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1047850
37.
Toward a Normative Definition of Medical Professionalism. Academic Medicine [Internet]. 75(6):612–616. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00001888-200006000-00010&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
38.
Freidson E. Professionalism: the third logic [Internet]. Oxford: Wiley; 2013. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4029681
39.
Rashid A, Siriwardena N. The professionalism of education and educators in postgraduate medicine. Education for Primary Care. 2005;16(3):235–245.
40.
David Halpin and Alex Moore. EDUCATIONAL PROFESSIONALISM IN AN AGE OF UNCERTAINTY: THE EMERGENCE OF ‘ECLECTIC & PRAGMATIC’ TEACHER IDENTITIES. Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Studies [Internet]. Hitotsubashi UniversityHitotsubashi University; 2006;38(2):119–140. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43294506?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
41.
MacDonald K. Sociological Analysis of the Professions Chapter 1. The sociology of the professions. London: Sage; 1995.
42.
Barnett R. Critical Professionalism; Chapter 10. Higher education: a critical business. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press; 1997.
43.
Freidson E. Profession of medicine: a study of the sociology of applied knowledge. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company; 1970.
44.
Yvonna S. Lincoln Egon G Guba. Naturalistic inquiry / Yvonna S. Lincoln, Egon G. Guba.
45.
Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-analyses. [Internet]. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute.; Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
46.
Bunniss S, Kelly DR. Research paradigms in medical education research. Medical Education [Internet]. 2010 Apr;44(4):358–366. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03611.x
47.
Pope C, Mays N. Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):42–45.
48.
Louis Cohen, Lawrence Manion And Keith Morrison ; With Contributions From Richard Bell, Stewart Martin, Gary McCulloch And Carmel O’Sullivan. Research Methods in Education [Internet]. Routledge Ltd - M.U.A.; 7AD. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780203720967
49.
How to read a paper | The BMJ [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-readers/publications/how-read-paper
