1.
van der Vleuten CPM, Driessen EW. What would happen to education if we take education evidence seriously? Perspectives on Medical Education. 2014 Jun;3(3):222–32.
2.
Crotty M. The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process [Internet]. London: SAGE; 1998. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1099439&site=ehost-live&scope=site
3.
Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. The Lancet. 2010 Dec;376(9756):1923–58.
4.
Hodges BD, Kuper A. Theory and Practice in the Design and Conduct of Graduate Medical Education. Academic Medicine [Internet]. 2012 Jan;87(1):25–33. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/fulltext/2012/01000/Theory_and_Practice_in_the_Design_and_Conduct_of.13.aspx
5.
Newman M. Ch.4: Critical appraisal I: is the quality of the study good enough for you to use the findings? In: The evidence-based practice manual for nurses. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. p. 86–113.
6.
Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, Dillon L. Quality in qualitative evaluation : a framework for assessing research evidence [Internet]. Government Chief Social Researcher’s Office, Cabinet Office; 2003. Available from: https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=UCL_IOE_DERA_DS21069&context=L&vid=UCL_VU2&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&tab=local&lang=en_US
7.
Swanwick T, Buckley G. Introduction: Understanding Medical Education. Chapter. In: Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice [Internet]. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. Available from: http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781444320299
8.
McManus I. Student selection - Chapter. In: A practical guide for medical teachers. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2009.
9.
Patterson F, Ferguson E. Selection for Medical Education and Training - Chapter. In: Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice [Internet]. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 352–65. Available from: http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781444320299
10.
Bowles N. Methods of nurse selection: a review. Nursing standard. 1995;9(15):25–9.
11.
Cadman C, Brewer J. Emotional intelligence: a vital prerequisite for recruitment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Management. 2001 Nov;9(6):321–4.
12.
Value of admission interviews in selecting of undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Nursing Management. 2000 Mar;8(2):101–6.
13.
Ferguson E. Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature. BMJ. 2002 Apr 20;324(7343):952–7.
14.
Jefferis T. Selection for specialist training: what can we learn from other countries? BMJ. 2007 Jun 23;334(7607):1302–4.
15.
Matthews G, Deary IJ. Personality traits [Internet]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1998. Available from: http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3710646750004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760
16.
Daniels K, Macdonald LAC. Equality, diversity and discrimination: a student text. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development; 2005.
17.
Patterson F, Lane P, Ferguson E, Norfolk T. Competency-based selection system for general practitioner registrars. BMJ Career Focus [Internet]. 2001;323(7311). Available from: https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjhiPro34vWAhUoI8AKHSPDCd4QFgg9MAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fgprecruitment.hee.nhs.uk%2FLinkClick.aspx%3Ffileticket%3DdVJN7iH4B50%253D%26portalid%3D8&usg=AFQjCNGPMb675vLPRZMn--PFbMwspi3vyA
18.
The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: Practical and Theoretical Implications of 85 Years of Research Findings. Psychological Bulletin [Internet]. 124(2). Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00006823-199809000-00006&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
19.
Park S, Khan NF, Hampshire M, Knox R, Malpass A, Thomas J, et al. A BEME systematic review of UK undergraduate medical education in the general practice setting: BEME Guide No. 32. Medical Teacher. 2015 Jul 3;37(7):611–30.
20.
Thistlethwaite J. Interprofessional education: a review of context, learning and the research agenda. Medical Education. 2012 Jan;46(1):58–70.
21.
Freeth D. Interprofessional Education; Chapter 9. In: Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice [Internet]. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 53–68. Available from: http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781444320299
22.
Sargeant J. Theories to aid understanding and implementation of interprofessional education. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2009 Summer;29(3):178–84.
23.
Shaw R. Idenityfing and Synthesising Qualitative Literature. Chapter 2 in Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy. In: Harper D, Thompson AR, editors. Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy [Internet]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2012. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9781119973249
24.
Gough D, Thomas J. Commonality and diversity in reviews. Chapter 3. In: An introduction to systematic reviews. Los Angeles: Sage; 2012.
25.
Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Synthesising Qualitative Research Findings: Qualitative Metasynthesis. Chapter 7. In: Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Springer Publishing Company; 2007.
26.
Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies [Internet]. Vol. Qualitative research methods. Newbury Park, Calif: SAGE; 1988. Available from: http://SRMO.sagepub.com/view/meta-ethnography/SAGE.xml
27.
Simulation-Based Medical Education: An Ethical Imperative. Academic Medicine [Internet]. 78(8):783–8. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00001888-200308000-00006&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
28.
Dieckmann P, Krage R. Simulation and psychology. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2013 Dec;26(6):714–20.
29.
Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Hatala R, Zendejas B, Cook DA. Reconsidering Fidelity in Simulation-Based Training. Academic Medicine. 2014 Mar;89(3):387–92.
30.
Fenwick TJ, Edwards R, Sawchuk PH. Emerging approaches in educational research: tracing the sociomaterial. London: Routledge; 2011.
31.
Miles A. Complexity in medicine and healthcare: people and systems, theory and practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2009 Jun;15(3):409–10.
32.
Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, Sullivan JE, Issenberg SB. Simulation in healthcare education: A best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Medical Teacher. 2013 Oct;35(10):e1511–30.
33.
McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003â2009. Medical Education. 2010 Jan;44(1):50–63.
34.
Brown J, Noble LM, Papageorgiou A, Kidd J, editors. Clinical Communication in Medicine [Internet]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2015. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9781118728130
35.
Marrying Content and Process in Clinical Method Teaching: Enhancing the Calgary–Cambridge Guides. Academic Medicine [Internet]. 78(8):802–9. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00001888-200308000-00011&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
36.
Cunningham B, Andrews D, Ball SJ, Barnett R, Burke PJ, Crook D, et al. Exploring Professionalism [Internet]. Vol. Bedford Way Papers. London: Institute of Education Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1047850
37.
Toward a Normative Definition of Medical Professionalism. Academic Medicine [Internet]. 75(6):612–6. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00001888-200006000-00010&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
38.
Freidson E. Professionalism: the third logic [Internet]. Oxford: Wiley; 2013. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=4029681
39.
Rashid A, Siriwardena N. The professionalism of education and educators in postgraduate medicine. Education for Primary Care. 2005;16(3):235–45.
40.
David Halpin and Alex Moore. EDUCATIONAL PROFESSIONALISM IN AN AGE OF UNCERTAINTY: THE EMERGENCE OF ‘ECLECTIC & PRAGMATIC’ TEACHER IDENTITIES. Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Studies [Internet]. 2006;38(2):119–40. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43294506?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
41.
MacDonald K. Sociological Analysis of the Professions Chapter 1. In: The sociology of the professions. London: Sage; 1995.
42.
Barnett R. Critical Professionalism; Chapter 10. In: Higher education: a critical business. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press; 1997.
43.
Freidson E. Profession of medicine: a study of the sociology of applied knowledge. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company; 1970.
44.
Yvonna S. Lincoln Egon G Guba. Naturalistic inquiry / Yvonna S. Lincoln, Egon G. Guba.
45.
Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-analyses. [Internet]. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute.; Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
46.
Bunniss S, Kelly DR. Research paradigms in medical education research. Medical Education [Internet]. 2010 Apr;44(4):358–66. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03611.x
47.
Pope C, Mays N. Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):42–5.
48.
Louis Cohen, Lawrence Manion And Keith Morrison ; With Contributions From Richard Bell, Stewart Martin, Gary McCulloch And Carmel O’Sullivan. Research Methods in Education [Internet]. Routledge Ltd - M.U.A.; 7AD. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780203720967
49.
How to read a paper | The BMJ [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-readers/publications/how-read-paper
