1.
Adams J K. Laboratory studies of behaviour without awareness. Psychological Bulletin. 1957;54(5):383-405. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=yrovft&AN=00006823-195709000-00002&PDF=y
2.
Adams JK. Laboratory Studies of Behaviour Without Awareness. Psychological Bulletin. 1957;54(5). http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=yrovft&AN=00006823-195709000-00002&PDF=y
3.
Merikle PM, Smilek D, Eastwood JD. Perception without awareness: perspectives from cognitive psychology. Cognition. 4AD;79(1-2):115-134. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027700001268
4.
Raft Kunst-Wilson W, Zajonc RB. Affective Discrimination of Stimuli that cannot be Recognized. Science. 2AD;207(4430):557-558. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1684047?&Search=yes&searchText=discrimination&searchText=affective&searchText=stimuli&list=hide&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253Daffective%252Bdiscrimination%252Bof%252Bstimuli%2526filter%253Djid%25253A10.2307%25252Fj100000%2526Search%253DSearch%2526wc%253Don%2526fc%253Doff%2526globalSearch%253D%2526sbbBox%253D%2526sbjBox%253D%2526sbpBox%253D&prevSearch=&item=1&ttl=45&returnArticleService=showFullText
5.
Murphy ST. Affect, Cognition, and Awareness: Affective Priming With Optimal and Suboptimal Stimulus Exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 64(5):723-739. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00005205-199305000-00003&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
6.
Murphy ST, Zajonc RB. Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. PubMed.gov. Published 1993. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8505704?report=abstract
7.
Mack A, Rock I. Inattentional Blindness. Vol MIT Press/Bradford Books series in cognitive psychology. MIT Press; 2000.
8.
Most SB, Simons DJ, Scholl BJ, Jimenez R, Clifford E, Chabris CF. How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness. PubMed.gov. 2001;12(1):9-17. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00303
9.
Most SB, Simons DJ, Sholl BJ, Jimenez R, Clifford E, Chabris CF. How not to be seen: the contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. PubMed.gov. 1AD;12(1):9-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11294235
10.
Moore CM, Egeth H. Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance. 1997;23(2). http://pbs.jhu.edu/research/egeth/publications/PDF/PWA_article.pdf
11.
Simons DJ, Chabris CF. Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception. 1999;28(9):1059-1074. doi:10.1068/p2952
12.
Simons DJ, Chabris CF. Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. PubMed.gov. 1999;28(9):1059-1074. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10694957
13.
O’Regan JK, Rensink RA, Clark JJ. Change-blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’. Nature. 3AD;398(6722). http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v398/n6722/full/398034a0.html
14.
Rensink RA, O’Regan JK, Clark JJ. To See or not to See: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes. Psychological Science. 1997;8(5):368-373. http://pss.sagepub.com/content/8/5/368
15.
Simons DJ, Levin DT. Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1998;5(4):644-649. http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FBF03208840
16.
Daniel J. Simons and Michael S. Ambinder. Change Blindness: Theory and Consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 14(1):44-48. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20182983
17.
Tsal Y, Kolbet L. Disambiguating ambiguous figures by selective attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 2AD;37(1):25-37. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14640748508400950#.Uvp1eF76kjU
18.
Chaudhuri A. Modulation of the motion aftereffect by selective attention. Nature. 3AD;344. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v344/n6261/pdf/344060a0.pdf
19.
Rees G, Lavie N. What can functional imaging reveal about the role of attention in visual awareness? Neuropsychologia. 1AD;39(2):1343-1353. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393201001221
20.
Beck DM, Rees G, Frith CD, Lavie N. Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nature Neuroscience. 2001;4(6):645-650. http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/88477
21.
Carmel D, Lavie N, Rees G. Conscious Awareness of Flicker in Humans Involves Frontal and Parietal Cortex. Current Biology. 5AD;16(9):907-911. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982206013522
22.
Rees G, Kreiman G, Koch C. Neural correlates of consciousness in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 4AD;3(4):261-270. http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v3/n4/full/nrn783.html
23.
Cartwright-Finch U, Lavie N. The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness. Cognition - Journal - Elsevier. Published online 1AD. http://www.icn.ucl.ac.uk/lavielab/reprints/Cartwright-Finch-Lavie.pdf
24.
Lavie N. The role of perceptual load in visual awareness. Brain Research. 3AD;1080(1):91-100. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899305013910
25.
Lavie N. Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005;9(2):75-82. http://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences//retrieve/pii/S136466130400316X?_returnURL=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S136466130400316X?showall=true
26.
Lavie N. Load Theory of Selective Attention and Cognitive Control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 133(3):339-354. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00004785-200409000-00002&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
27.
Lavie N, Hirst A, De Fockert JW, Viding E. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2004;133(3):339-354. http://www.icn.ucl.ac.uk/lavielab/reprints/Lavie-etal-04.pdf
28.
Lavie N, de Fockert J. The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 8AD;12(4):669-674. http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FBF03196756#page-1
29.
Lavie N, de Fockert J. The role of working memory in attentional capture. In press in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 8AD;12(4):669-674. http://www.icn.ucl.ac.uk/lavielab/reprints/preprint-wm-ac.pdf
30.
de Fockert JW, Bremner AJ. Release of inattentional blindness by high working memory load: Elucidating the relationship between working memory and selective attention. Cognition. 2011;121(3):400-408. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027711002174
31.
Lavie N, de Fockert J. The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 8AD;12(4):669-674. http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FBF03196756#page-1
32.
Konstantinou N, Bahrami B, Rees G, Lavie N. Visual Short-term Memory Load Reduces Retinotopic Cortex Response to Contrast. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2012;24(11):2199-2210. http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/jocn_a_00279
33.
Konstantinou N, Bahrami B, Rees G, Lavie N. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Visual short-term memory load reduces retinotopic cortex response to contrast. 2012;24(11). http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/jocn_a_00279
34.
US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. PubMed.gov. Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes. Published 1AD. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17129748
35.
US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. PubMed.gov. The attentional requirements of consciousness. Published 8AD. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=cohen nakayama cavanagh %5Bau%5D
36.
US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. PubMed.gov. Attentional load modulates responses of human primary visual cortex to invisible stimuli. Published 3AD. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17346967
37.
US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. PubMed.gov. Unconscious orientation processing depends on perceptual load. Published 3AD. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18484818
38.
Yokoyama T, Sakai H, Noguchi Y, Kita S. Perception of Direct Gaze Does Not Require Focus of Attention. Scientific Reports. 2014;4. doi:10.1038/srep03858
39.
Owen AM. Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State. Science. 2006;313(5792):1402-1402. doi:10.1126/science.1130197
40.
Greenberg DL. Comment on ‘Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State’. Science. 2007;315(5816):1221b-1221b. doi:10.1126/science.1135284
41.
Nachev P, Husain M. Comment on ‘Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State’. Science. 2007;315(5816):1221a-1221a. doi:10.1126/science.1135096
42.
Fleming SM, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Metacognition: computation, biology and function. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 19AD;367(1594):1280-1286. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3318771/
43.
Terrace HS, Son LK. Comparative metacognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2009;19(1):67-74. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2009.06.004
44.
Griffin DR. Animals know more than we used to think. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001;98(9):4833-4834. doi:10.1073/pnas.091088198
45.
Narayanan NS, Cavanagh JF, Frank MJ, Laubach M. Common medial frontal mechanisms of adaptive control in humans and rodents. Nature Neuroscience. 16(12):1888-1895. http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v16/n12/full/nn.3549.html
46.
Ullsperger M, Fischer AG, Nigbur R, Endrass T. Neural mechanisms and temporal dynamics of performance monitoring. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 18(5):259-267. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661314000539
47.
Yeung N, Summerfield C. Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012;367(1594):1310-1321. http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/367/1594/1310.abstract
48.
Summerfield C, Yeung N. Oh, rats! Post-error behavioral adjustment in creatures great and small. Nature Neuroscience. 16:1715-1716. http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v16/n12/full/nn.3577.html
49.
Johnson DDP, Fowler JH. The evolution of overconfidence. Nature. 477(7364):317-320. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v477/n7364/full/nature10384.html
50.
Kepecs A, Mainen ZF. A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012;367(1594):1322-1337. http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/367/1594/1322.full.html#ref-list-1
51.
Smith JD, Couchman JJ, Beran MJ. The highs and lows of theoretical interpretation in animal-metacognition research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012;367(1594):1297-1309. http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/367/1594/1297.abstract
52.
Carruthers P. Meta-cognition in Animals: A Skeptical Look. Journal compilation. Published online 1AD. http://faculty.philosophy.umd.edu/pcarruthers/Meta-cognition.pdf
53.
Fleming SM, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Metacognition: computation, biology and function. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 19AD;367(1594):1280-1286. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3318771/
54.
Schnyer DM, Verfaellie M, Alexander MP, LaFleche G, Nicholls L, Kaszniak AW. A role for right medial prefrontal cortex in accurate feeling-of-knowing judgments: evidence from patients with lesions to frontal cortex. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(7):957-966. http://www.christofflab.ca/pdfs/2009/01/schnyer-et-al-2004.pdf
55.
Festinger L. A Theory of Social Comparison Process. Human Relations. 5AD;7(2):117-140. http://kslab.kaist.ac.kr/kse612/Festinger1954.pdf
56.
Sapolsky RS. The Influence of Social Hierarchy on Primate Health. Science. 29AD;308:648-652. https://galileo.seas.harvard.edu/images/material/2800/1140/Sapolsky_TheInfluenceofSocialHierarchyonPrimateHealth.pdf
57.
Education Portal. Self-Comparison Theory: Upward vs. Downward Social Comparison. http://education-portal.com/academy/lesson/self-comparison-theory-upward-vs-downward-social-comparison.html#lesson
58.
Bahrami B, Olsen K, Latham PE, Roepstorff A, Rees G, Frith CD. Optimally interacting minds. Science. 27AD;329(5995):1081-1085. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/329/5995/1081
59.
Wright ND, Bahrami B, Johnson E, et al. Testosterone disrupts human collaboration by increasing egocentric choices. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society: Biological Sciences. 7AD;279(1736):2275-2280. http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2012/01/27/rspb.2011.2523
60.
Zaki J, Ochsner K. Reintegrating the Study of Accuracy Into Social Cognition Research. Psychological Inquiry. 2011;22(3):159-182. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2011.551743
61.
Koriat A. When Are Two Heads Better than One and Why? Science. 2012;336(6079):360-362. doi:10.1126/science.1216549
62.
Hertwig R. Tapping into the Wisdom of the Crowd--with Confidence. Science. 2012;336(6079):303-304. doi:10.1126/science.1221403
63.
Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of personality and social psychology. 77(6):1121-1134. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10626367
64.
Heider F. Attitudes and Cognitive Organization. The Journal of Psychology. 21(1):107-112. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275
65.
Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ. Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology. 55:591-621. http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
66.
Campbell-Meiklejohn DK, Bach DR, Roepstorff A, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. How the Opinion of Others Affects Our Valuation of Objects. Current Biology. 2010;20(13):1165-1170. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.055
67.
Izuma K, Adolphs R. Social Manipulation of Preference in the Human Brain. Neuron. 2013;78(3):563-573. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.023
