1.
Adams, J., K. Laboratory studies of behaviour without awareness. Psychological Bulletin 54, 383–405 (1957).
2.
Adams, J. K. Laboratory Studies of Behaviour Without Awareness. Psychological Bulletin 54, (1957).
3.
Merikle, P. M., Smilek, D. & Eastwood, J. D. Perception without awareness: perspectives from cognitive psychology. Cognition 79, 115–134 (4AD).
4.
Raft Kunst-Wilson, W. & Zajonc, R. B. Affective Discrimination of Stimuli that cannot be Recognized. Science 207, 557–558 (2AD).
5.
Murphy, S. T. Affect, Cognition, and Awareness: Affective Priming With Optimal and Suboptimal Stimulus Exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64, 723–739.
6.
Murphy, S. T. & Zajonc, R. B. Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. PubMed.gov vol. 64 723–739 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8505704?report=abstract (1993).
7.
Mack, A. & Rock, I. Inattentional blindness. vol. MIT Press/Bradford Books series in cognitive psychology (MIT Press, 2000).
8.
Most, S. B. et al. How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness. PubMed.gov 12, 9–17 (2001).
9.
Most, S. B. et al. How not to be seen: the contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. PubMed.gov 12, 9–17 (1AD).
10.
Moore, C. M. & Egeth, H. Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance 23, (1997).
11.
Simons, D. J. & Chabris, C. F. Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic  events. Perception 28, 1059–1074 (1999).
12.
Simons, D. J. & Chabris, C. F. Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. PubMed.gov 28, 1059–1074 (1999).
13.
O’Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A. & Clark, J. J. Change-blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’. Nature 398, (3AD).
14.
Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K. & Clark, J. J. To See or not to See: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes. Psychological Science 8, 368–373 (1997).
15.
Simons, D. J. & Levin, D. T. Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5, 644–649 (1998).
16.
Daniel J. Simons and Michael S. Ambinder. Change Blindness: Theory and Consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science 14, 44–48.
17.
Tsal, Y. & Kolbet, L. Disambiguating ambiguous figures by selective attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 37, 25–37 (2AD).
18.
Chaudhuri, A. Modulation of the motion aftereffect by selective attention. Nature 344, (3AD).
19.
Rees, G. & Lavie, N. What can functional imaging reveal about the role of attention in visual awareness? Neuropsychologia 39, 1343–1353 (1AD).
20.
Beck, D. M., Rees, G., Frith, C. D. & Lavie, N. Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nature Neuroscience 4, 645–650 (2001).
21.
Carmel, D., Lavie, N. & Rees, G. Conscious Awareness of Flicker in Humans Involves Frontal and Parietal Cortex. Current Biology 16, 907–911 (5AD).
22.
Rees, G., Kreiman, G. & Koch, C. Neural correlates of consciousness in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3, 261–270 (4AD).
23.
Cartwright-Finch, U. & Lavie, N. The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness. Cognition - Journal - Elsevier (1AD).
24.
Lavie, N. The role of perceptual load in visual awareness. Brain Research 1080, 91–100 (3AD).
25.
Lavie, N. Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9, 75–82 (2005).
26.
Lavie, N. Load Theory of Selective Attention and Cognitive Control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133, 339–354.
27.
Lavie, N., Hirst, A., De Fockert, J. W. & Viding, E. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133, 339–354 (2004).
28.
Lavie, N. & de Fockert, J. The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 12, 669–674 (8AD).
29.
Lavie, N. & de Fockert, J. The role of working memory in attentional capture. In press in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review vol. 12 669–674 (8AD).
30.
de Fockert, J. W. & Bremner, A. J. Release of inattentional blindness by high working memory load: Elucidating the relationship between working memory and selective attention. Cognition 121, 400–408 (2011).
31.
Lavie, N. & de Fockert, J. The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 12, 669–674 (8AD).
32.
Konstantinou, N., Bahrami, B., Rees, G. & Lavie, N. Visual Short-term Memory Load Reduces Retinotopic Cortex Response to Contrast. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24, 2199–2210 (2012).
33.
Konstantinou, N., Bahrami, B., Rees, G. & Lavie, N. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Visual short-term memory load reduces retinotopic cortex response to contrast 24, (2012).
34.
US National Library of Medicine & National Institutes of Health. PubMed.gov. Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17129748 (1AD).
35.
US National Library of Medicine & National Institutes of Health. PubMed.gov. The attentional requirements of consciousness. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=cohen nakayama cavanagh %5Bau%5D (8AD).
36.
US National Library of Medicine & National Institutes of Health. PubMed.gov. Attentional load modulates responses of human primary visual cortex to invisible stimuli. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17346967 (3AD).
37.
US National Library of Medicine & National Institutes of Health. PubMed.gov. Unconscious orientation processing depends on perceptual load http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18484818 (3AD).
38.
Yokoyama, T., Sakai, H., Noguchi, Y. & Kita, S. Perception of Direct Gaze Does Not Require Focus of Attention. Scientific Reports 4, (2014).
39.
Owen, A. M. Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State. Science 313, 1402–1402 (2006).
40.
Greenberg, D. L. Comment on ‘Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State’. Science 315, 1221b–1221b (2007).
41.
Nachev, P. & Husain, M. Comment on ‘Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State’. Science 315, 1221a–1221a (2007).
42.
Fleming, S. M., Dolan, R. J. & Frith, C. D. Metacognition: computation, biology and function. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367, 1280–1286 (19AD).
43.
Terrace, H. S. & Son, L. K. Comparative metacognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 19, 67–74 (2009).
44.
Griffin, D. R. Animals know more than we used to think. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98, 4833–4834 (2001).
45.
Narayanan, N. S., Cavanagh, J. F., Frank, M. J. & Laubach, M. Common medial frontal mechanisms of adaptive control in humans and rodents. Nature Neuroscience 16, 1888–1895.
46.
Ullsperger, M., Fischer, A. G., Nigbur, R. & Endrass, T. Neural mechanisms and temporal dynamics of performance monitoring. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18, 259–267.
47.
Yeung, N. & Summerfield, C. Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367, 1310–1321 (2012).
48.
Summerfield, C. & Yeung, N. Oh, rats! Post-error behavioral adjustment in creatures great and small. Nature Neuroscience 16, 1715–1716.
49.
Johnson, D. D. P. & Fowler, J. H. The evolution of overconfidence. Nature 477, 317–320.
50.
Kepecs, A. & Mainen, Z. F. A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367, 1322–1337 (2012).
51.
Smith, J. D., Couchman, J. J. & Beran, M. J. The highs and lows of theoretical interpretation in animal-metacognition research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367, 1297–1309 (2012).
52.
Carruthers, P. Meta-cognition in Animals: A Skeptical Look. Journal compilation (1AD).
53.
Fleming, S. M., Dolan, R. J. & Frith, C. D. Metacognition: computation, biology and function. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367, 1280–1286 (19AD).
54.
Schnyer, D. M. et al. A role for right medial prefrontal cortex in accurate feeling-of-knowing judgments: evidence from patients with lesions to frontal cortex. Neuropsychologia 42, 957–966 (2004).
55.
Festinger, L. A Theory of Social Comparison Process. Human Relations 7, 117–140 (5AD).
56.
Sapolsky, R. S. The Influence of Social Hierarchy on Primate Health. Science 308, 648–652 (29AD).
57.
Education Portal. Self-Comparison Theory: Upward vs. Downward Social Comparison.
58.
Bahrami, B. et al. Optimally interacting minds. Science 329, 1081–1085 (27AD).
59.
Wright, N. D. et al. Testosterone disrupts human collaboration by increasing egocentric choices. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society: Biological Sciences 279, 2275–2280 (7AD).
60.
Zaki, J. & Ochsner, K. Reintegrating the Study of Accuracy Into Social Cognition Research. Psychological Inquiry 22, 159–182 (2011).
61.
Koriat, A. When Are Two Heads Better than One and Why? Science 336, 360–362 (2012).
62.
Hertwig, R. Tapping into the Wisdom of the Crowd--with Confidence. Science 336, 303–304 (2012).
63.
Kruger, J. & Dunning, D. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of personality and social psychology 77, 1121–1134.
64.
Heider, F. Attitudes and Cognitive Organization. The Journal of Psychology 21, 107–112.
65.
Cialdini, R. B. & Goldstein, N. J. Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology 55, 591–621.
66.
Campbell-Meiklejohn, D. K., Bach, D. R., Roepstorff, A., Dolan, R. J. & Frith, C. D. How the Opinion of Others Affects Our Valuation of Objects. Current Biology 20, 1165–1170 (2010).
67.
Izuma, K. & Adolphs, R. Social Manipulation of Preference in the Human Brain. Neuron 78, 563–573 (2013).