1
Adams J K. Laboratory studies of behaviour without awareness. Psychological Bulletin. 1957;54:383–405.
2
Adams JK. Laboratory Studies of Behaviour Without Awareness. Psychological Bulletin. 1957;54.
3
Merikle PM, Smilek D, Eastwood JD. Perception without awareness: perspectives from cognitive psychology. Cognition. 4 AD;79:115–34.
4
Raft Kunst-Wilson W, Zajonc RB. Affective Discrimination of Stimuli that cannot be Recognized. Science. 2 AD;207:557–8.
5
Murphy ST. Affect, Cognition, and Awareness: Affective Priming With Optimal and Suboptimal Stimulus Exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ;64:723–39.
6
Murphy ST, Zajonc RB. Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. PubMed.gov. 1993;64:723–39. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8505704?report=abstract
7
Mack A, Rock I. Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press 2000.
8
Most SB, Simons DJ, Scholl BJ, et al. How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness. PubMed.gov. 2001;12:9–17. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00303
9
Most SB, Simons DJ, Sholl BJ, et al. How not to be seen: the contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. PubMed.gov. 1 AD;12:9–17.
10
Moore CM, Egeth H. Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance. 1997;23.
11
Simons DJ, Chabris CF. Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception. 1999;28:1059–74. doi: 10.1068/p2952
12
Simons DJ, Chabris CF. Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. PubMed.gov. 1999;28:1059–74.
13
O’Regan JK, Rensink RA, Clark JJ. Change-blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’. Nature. 3 AD;398.
14
Rensink RA, O’Regan JK, Clark JJ. To See or not to See: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes. Psychological Science. 1997;8:368–73.
15
Simons DJ, Levin DT. Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1998;5:644–9.
16
Daniel J. Simons and Michael S. Ambinder. Change Blindness: Theory and Consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science. ;14:44–8.
17
Tsal Y, Kolbet L. Disambiguating ambiguous figures by selective attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 2 AD;37:25–37.
18
Chaudhuri A. Modulation of the motion aftereffect by selective attention. Nature. 3 AD;344.
19
Rees G, Lavie N. What can functional imaging reveal about the role of attention in visual awareness? Neuropsychologia. 1 AD;39:1343–53.
20
Beck DM, Rees G, Frith CD, et al. Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nature Neuroscience. 2001;4:645–50.
21
Carmel D, Lavie N, Rees G. Conscious Awareness of Flicker in Humans Involves Frontal and Parietal Cortex. Current Biology. 5 AD;16:907–11.
22
Rees G, Kreiman G, Koch C. Neural correlates of consciousness in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 4 AD;3:261–70.
23
Cartwright-Finch U, Lavie N. The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness. Cognition - Journal - Elsevier. Published Online First: 1 AD.
24
Lavie N. The role of perceptual load in visual awareness. Brain Research. 3 AD;1080:91–100.
25
Lavie N. Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005;9:75–82.
26
Lavie N. Load Theory of Selective Attention and Cognitive Control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. ;133:339–54.
27
Lavie N, Hirst A, De Fockert JW, et al. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2004;133:339–54.
28
Lavie N, de Fockert J. The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 8 AD;12:669–74.
29
Lavie N, de Fockert J. The role of working memory in attentional capture. In press in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 8 AD;12:669–74.
30
de Fockert JW, Bremner AJ. Release of inattentional blindness by high working memory load: Elucidating the relationship between working memory and selective attention. Cognition. 2011;121:400–8.
31
Lavie N, de Fockert J. The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 8 AD;12:669–74.
32
Konstantinou N, Bahrami B, Rees G, et al. Visual Short-term Memory Load Reduces Retinotopic Cortex Response to Contrast. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2012;24:2199–210.
33
Konstantinou N, Bahrami B, Rees G, et al. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Visual short-term memory load reduces retinotopic cortex response to contrast. 2012;24.
34
US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. PubMed.gov. Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes. 1 AD. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17129748
35
US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. PubMed.gov. The attentional requirements of consciousness. 8 AD. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=cohen nakayama cavanagh %5Bau%5D
36
US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. PubMed.gov. Attentional load modulates responses of human primary visual cortex to invisible stimuli. 3 AD. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17346967
37
US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. PubMed.gov. Unconscious orientation processing depends on perceptual load. 3 AD. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18484818
38
Yokoyama T, Sakai H, Noguchi Y, et al. Perception of Direct Gaze Does Not Require Focus of Attention. Scientific Reports. 2014;4. doi: 10.1038/srep03858
39
Owen AM. Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State. Science. 2006;313:1402–1402. doi: 10.1126/science.1130197
40
Greenberg DL. Comment on ‘Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State’. Science. 2007;315:1221b–1221b. doi: 10.1126/science.1135284
41
Nachev P, Husain M. Comment on ‘Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State’. Science. 2007;315:1221a–1221a. doi: 10.1126/science.1135096
42
Fleming SM, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Metacognition: computation, biology and function. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 19 AD;367:1280–6.
43
Terrace HS, Son LK. Comparative metacognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2009;19:67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.06.004
44
Griffin DR. Animals know more than we used to think. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001;98:4833–4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091088198
45
Narayanan NS, Cavanagh JF, Frank MJ, et al. Common medial frontal mechanisms of adaptive control in humans and rodents. Nature Neuroscience. ;16:1888–95.
46
Ullsperger M, Fischer AG, Nigbur R, et al. Neural mechanisms and temporal dynamics of performance monitoring. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. ;18:259–67.
47
Yeung N, Summerfield C. Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012;367:1310–21.
48
Summerfield C, Yeung N. Oh, rats! Post-error behavioral adjustment in creatures great and small. Nature Neuroscience. ;16:1715–6.
49
Johnson DDP, Fowler JH. The evolution of overconfidence. Nature. ;477:317–20.
50
Kepecs A, Mainen ZF. A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012;367:1322–37.
51
Smith JD, Couchman JJ, Beran MJ. The highs and lows of theoretical interpretation in animal-metacognition research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012;367:1297–309.
52
Carruthers P. Meta-cognition in Animals: A Skeptical Look. Journal compilation. 1 AD.
53
Fleming SM, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Metacognition: computation, biology and function. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 19 AD;367:1280–6.
54
Schnyer DM, Verfaellie M, Alexander MP, et al. A role for right medial prefrontal cortex in accurate feeling-of-knowing judgments: evidence from patients with lesions to frontal cortex. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42:957–66.
55
Festinger L. A Theory of Social Comparison Process. Human Relations. 5 AD;7:117–40.
56
Sapolsky RS. The Influence of Social Hierarchy on Primate Health. Science. 29 AD;308:648–52.
57
Education Portal. Self-Comparison Theory: Upward vs. Downward Social Comparison.
58
Bahrami B, Olsen K, Latham PE, et al. Optimally interacting minds. Science. 27 AD;329:1081–5.
59
Wright ND, Bahrami B, Johnson E, et al. Testosterone disrupts human collaboration by increasing egocentric choices. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society: Biological Sciences. 7 AD;279:2275–80.
60
Zaki J, Ochsner K. Reintegrating the Study of Accuracy Into Social Cognition Research. Psychological Inquiry. 2011;22:159–82. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2011.551743
61
Koriat A. When Are Two Heads Better than One and Why? Science. 2012;336:360–2. doi: 10.1126/science.1216549
62
Hertwig R. Tapping into the Wisdom of the Crowd--with Confidence. Science. 2012;336:303–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1221403
63
Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of personality and social psychology. ;77:1121–34.
64
Heider F. Attitudes and Cognitive Organization. The Journal of Psychology. ;21:107–12.
65
Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ. Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology. ;55:591–621.
66
Campbell-Meiklejohn DK, Bach DR, Roepstorff A, et al. How the Opinion of Others Affects Our Valuation of Objects. Current Biology. 2010;20:1165–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.055
67
Izuma K, Adolphs R. Social Manipulation of Preference in the Human Brain. Neuron. 2013;78:563–73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.023
