1
Adams J K. Laboratory studies of behaviour without awareness. Psychological Bulletin 1957;54:383–405.http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=yrovft&AN=00006823-195709000-00002&PDF=y
2
Adams JK. Laboratory Studies of Behaviour Without Awareness. Psychological Bulletin 1957;54.http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=yrovft&AN=00006823-195709000-00002&PDF=y
3
Merikle PM, Smilek D, Eastwood JD. Perception without awareness: perspectives from cognitive psychology. Cognition 4AD;79:115–34.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027700001268
4
Raft Kunst-Wilson W, Zajonc RB. Affective Discrimination of Stimuli that cannot be Recognized. Science 2AD;207:557–8.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1684047?&Search=yes&searchText=discrimination&searchText=affective&searchText=stimuli&list=hide&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253Daffective%252Bdiscrimination%252Bof%252Bstimuli%2526filter%253Djid%25253A10.2307%25252Fj100000%2526Search%253DSearch%2526wc%253Don%2526fc%253Doff%2526globalSearch%253D%2526sbbBox%253D%2526sbjBox%253D%2526sbpBox%253D&prevSearch=&item=1&ttl=45&returnArticleService=showFullText
5
Murphy ST. Affect, Cognition, and Awareness: Affective Priming With Optimal and Suboptimal Stimulus Exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology;64:723–39.http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00005205-199305000-00003&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
6
Murphy ST, Zajonc RB. Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. PubMed.gov. 1993;64:723–39.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8505704?report=abstract
7
Mack A, Rock I. Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2000.
8
Most SB, Simons DJ, Scholl BJ, et al. How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness. PubMed.gov 2001;12:9–17. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00303
9
Most SB, Simons DJ, Sholl BJ, et al. How not to be seen: the contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. PubMed.gov 1AD;12:9–17.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11294235
10
Moore CM, Egeth H. Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance 1997;23.http://pbs.jhu.edu/research/egeth/publications/PDF/PWA_article.pdf
11
Simons DJ, Chabris CF. Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 1999;28:1059–74. doi:10.1068/p2952
12
Simons DJ, Chabris CF. Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. PubMed.gov 1999;28:1059–74.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10694957
13
O’Regan JK, Rensink RA, Clark JJ. Change-blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’. Nature 3AD;398.http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v398/n6722/full/398034a0.html
14
Rensink RA, O’Regan JK, Clark JJ. To See or not to See: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes. Psychological Science 1997;8:368–73.http://pss.sagepub.com/content/8/5/368
15
Simons DJ, Levin DT. Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1998;5:644–9.http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FBF03208840
16
Daniel J. Simons and Michael S. Ambinder. Change Blindness: Theory and Consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science;14:44–8.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20182983
17
Tsal Y, Kolbet L. Disambiguating ambiguous figures by selective attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 2AD;37:25–37.http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14640748508400950#.Uvp1eF76kjU
18
Chaudhuri A. Modulation of the motion aftereffect by selective attention. Nature 3AD;344.http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v344/n6261/pdf/344060a0.pdf
19
Rees G, Lavie N. What can functional imaging reveal about the role of attention in visual awareness? Neuropsychologia 1AD;39:1343–53.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393201001221
20
Beck DM, Rees G, Frith CD, et al. Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nature Neuroscience 2001;4:645–50.http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/88477
21
Carmel D, Lavie N, Rees G. Conscious Awareness of Flicker in Humans Involves Frontal and Parietal Cortex. Current Biology 5AD;16:907–11.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982206013522
22
Rees G, Kreiman G, Koch C. Neural correlates of consciousness in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4AD;3:261–70.http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v3/n4/full/nrn783.html
23
Cartwright-Finch U, Lavie N. The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness. Cognition - Journal - Elsevier Published Online First: 1AD.http://www.icn.ucl.ac.uk/lavielab/reprints/Cartwright-Finch-Lavie.pdf
24
Lavie N. The role of perceptual load in visual awareness. Brain Research 3AD;1080:91–100.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899305013910
25
Lavie N. Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005;9:75–82.http://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences//retrieve/pii/S136466130400316X?_returnURL=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S136466130400316X?showall=true
26
Lavie N. Load Theory of Selective Attention and Cognitive Control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General;133:339–54.http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00004785-200409000-00002&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
27
Lavie N, Hirst A, De Fockert JW, et al. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004;133:339–54.http://www.icn.ucl.ac.uk/lavielab/reprints/Lavie-etal-04.pdf
28
Lavie N, de Fockert J. The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8AD;12:669–74.http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FBF03196756#page-1
29
Lavie N, de Fockert J. The role of working memory in attentional capture. In press in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 8AD;12:669–74.http://www.icn.ucl.ac.uk/lavielab/reprints/preprint-wm-ac.pdf
30
de Fockert JW, Bremner AJ. Release of inattentional blindness by high working memory load: Elucidating the relationship between working memory and selective attention. Cognition 2011;121:400–8.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027711002174
31
Lavie N, de Fockert J. The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8AD;12:669–74.http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FBF03196756#page-1
32
Konstantinou N, Bahrami B, Rees G, et al. Visual Short-term Memory Load Reduces Retinotopic Cortex Response to Contrast. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2012;24:2199–210.http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/jocn_a_00279
33
Konstantinou N, Bahrami B, Rees G, et al. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Visual short-term memory load reduces retinotopic cortex response to contrast 2012;24.http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/jocn_a_00279
34
US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. PubMed.gov. Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes. 1AD.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17129748
35
US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. PubMed.gov. The attentional requirements of consciousness. 8AD.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=cohen nakayama cavanagh %5Bau%5D
36
US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. PubMed.gov. Attentional load modulates responses of human primary visual cortex to invisible stimuli. 3AD.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17346967
37
US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. PubMed.gov. Unconscious orientation processing depends on perceptual load. 3AD.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18484818
38
Yokoyama T, Sakai H, Noguchi Y, et al. Perception of Direct Gaze Does Not Require Focus of Attention. Scientific Reports 2014;4. doi:10.1038/srep03858
39
Owen AM. Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State. Science 2006;313:1402–1402. doi:10.1126/science.1130197
40
Greenberg DL. Comment on ‘Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State’. Science 2007;315:1221b–1221b. doi:10.1126/science.1135284
41
Nachev P, Husain M. Comment on ‘Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State’. Science 2007;315:1221a–1221a. doi:10.1126/science.1135096
42
Fleming SM, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Metacognition: computation, biology and function. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 19AD;367:1280–6.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3318771/
43
Terrace HS, Son LK. Comparative metacognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2009;19:67–74. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2009.06.004
44
Griffin DR. Animals know more than we used to think. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2001;98:4833–4. doi:10.1073/pnas.091088198
45
Narayanan NS, Cavanagh JF, Frank MJ, et al. Common medial frontal mechanisms of adaptive control in humans and rodents. Nature Neuroscience;16:1888–95.http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v16/n12/full/nn.3549.html
46
Ullsperger M, Fischer AG, Nigbur R, et al. Neural mechanisms and temporal dynamics of performance monitoring. Trends in Cognitive Sciences;18:259–67.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661314000539
47
Yeung N, Summerfield C. Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2012;367:1310–21.http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/367/1594/1310.abstract
48
Summerfield C, Yeung N. Oh, rats! Post-error behavioral adjustment in creatures great and small. Nature Neuroscience;16:1715–6.http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v16/n12/full/nn.3577.html
49
Johnson DDP, Fowler JH. The evolution of overconfidence. Nature;477:317–20.http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v477/n7364/full/nature10384.html
50
Kepecs A, Mainen ZF. A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2012;367:1322–37.http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/367/1594/1322.full.html#ref-list-1
51
Smith JD, Couchman JJ, Beran MJ. The highs and lows of theoretical interpretation in animal-metacognition research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2012;367:1297–309.http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/367/1594/1297.abstract
52
Carruthers P. Meta-cognition in Animals: A Skeptical Look. Journal compilation. 1AD.http://faculty.philosophy.umd.edu/pcarruthers/Meta-cognition.pdf
53
Fleming SM, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Metacognition: computation, biology and function. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 19AD;367:1280–6.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3318771/
54
Schnyer DM, Verfaellie M, Alexander MP, et al. A role for right medial prefrontal cortex in accurate feeling-of-knowing judgments: evidence from patients with lesions to frontal cortex. Neuropsychologia 2004;42:957–66.http://www.christofflab.ca/pdfs/2009/01/schnyer-et-al-2004.pdf
55
Festinger L. A Theory of Social Comparison Process. Human Relations 5AD;7:117–40.http://kslab.kaist.ac.kr/kse612/Festinger1954.pdf
56
Sapolsky RS. The Influence of Social Hierarchy on Primate Health. Science 29AD;308:648–52.https://galileo.seas.harvard.edu/images/material/2800/1140/Sapolsky_TheInfluenceofSocialHierarchyonPrimateHealth.pdf
57
Education Portal. Self-Comparison Theory: Upward vs. Downward Social Comparison. http://education-portal.com/academy/lesson/self-comparison-theory-upward-vs-downward-social-comparison.html#lesson
58
Bahrami B, Olsen K, Latham PE, et al. Optimally interacting minds. Science 27AD;329:1081–5.http://www.sciencemag.org/content/329/5995/1081
59
Wright ND, Bahrami B, Johnson E, et al. Testosterone disrupts human collaboration by increasing egocentric choices. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society: Biological Sciences 7AD;279:2275–80.http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2012/01/27/rspb.2011.2523
60
Zaki J, Ochsner K. Reintegrating the Study of Accuracy Into Social Cognition Research. Psychological Inquiry 2011;22:159–82. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2011.551743
61
Koriat A. When Are Two Heads Better than One and Why? Science 2012;336:360–2. doi:10.1126/science.1216549
62
Hertwig R. Tapping into the Wisdom of the Crowd--with Confidence. Science 2012;336:303–4. doi:10.1126/science.1221403
63
Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of personality and social psychology;77:1121–34.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10626367
64
Heider F. Attitudes and Cognitive Organization. The Journal of Psychology;21:107–12.http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275
65
Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ. Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology;55:591–621.http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
66
Campbell-Meiklejohn DK, Bach DR, Roepstorff A, et al. How the Opinion of Others Affects Our Valuation of Objects. Current Biology 2010;20:1165–70. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.055
67
Izuma K, Adolphs R. Social Manipulation of Preference in the Human Brain. Neuron 2013;78:563–73. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.023
