[1]
J. Adams K., ‘Laboratory studies of behaviour without awareness’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 383–405, 1957 [Online]. Available: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=yrovft&AN=00006823-195709000-00002&PDF=y
[2]
J. K. Adams, ‘Laboratory Studies of Behaviour Without Awareness’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 54, no. 5, 1957 [Online]. Available: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=yrovft&AN=00006823-195709000-00002&PDF=y
[3]
P. M. Merikle, D. Smilek, and J. D. Eastwood, ‘Perception without awareness: perspectives from cognitive psychology’, Cognition, vol. 79, no. 1–2, pp. 115–134, 4AD [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027700001268
[4]
W. Raft Kunst-Wilson and R. B. Zajonc, ‘Affective Discrimination of Stimuli that cannot be Recognized’, Science, vol. 207, no. 4430, pp. 557–558, 2AD [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1684047?&Search=yes&searchText=discrimination&searchText=affective&searchText=stimuli&list=hide&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253Daffective%252Bdiscrimination%252Bof%252Bstimuli%2526filter%253Djid%25253A10.2307%25252Fj100000%2526Search%253DSearch%2526wc%253Don%2526fc%253Doff%2526globalSearch%253D%2526sbbBox%253D%2526sbjBox%253D%2526sbpBox%253D&prevSearch=&item=1&ttl=45&returnArticleService=showFullText
[5]
S. T. Murphy, ‘Affect, Cognition, and Awareness: Affective Priming With Optimal and Suboptimal Stimulus Exposures’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 723–739 [Online]. Available: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00005205-199305000-00003&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
[6]
S. T. Murphy and R. B. Zajonc, ‘Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures’, PubMed.gov, 1993. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8505704?report=abstract
[7]
A. Mack and I. Rock, Inattentional blindness, vol. MIT Press/Bradford Books series in cognitive psychology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2000.
[8]
S. B. Most, D. J. Simons, B. J. Scholl, R. Jimenez, E. Clifford, and C. F. Chabris, ‘How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness’, PubMed.gov, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 9–17, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00303.
[9]
S. B. Most, D. J. Simons, B. J. Sholl, R. Jimenez, E. Clifford, and C. F. Chabris, ‘How not to be seen: the contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness’, PubMed.gov, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 1AD [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11294235
[10]
C. M. Moore and H. Egeth, ‘Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention’, Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, vol. 23, no. 2, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://pbs.jhu.edu/research/egeth/publications/PDF/PWA_article.pdf
[11]
D. J. Simons and C. F. Chabris, ‘Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic  events’, Perception, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1059–1074, 1999, doi: 10.1068/p2952. [Online]. Available: http://www.perceptionweb.com/abstract.cgi?id=p2952
[12]
D. J. Simons and C. F. Chabris, ‘Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events’, PubMed.gov, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1059–1074, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10694957
[13]
J. K. O’Regan, R. A. Rensink, and J. J. Clark, ‘Change-blindness as a result of “mudsplashes”’, Nature, vol. 398, no. 6722, 3AD [Online]. Available: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v398/n6722/full/398034a0.html
[14]
R. A. Rensink, J. K. O’Regan, and J. J. Clark, ‘To See or not to See: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes’, Psychological Science, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 368–373, Sep. 1997 [Online]. Available: http://pss.sagepub.com/content/8/5/368
[15]
D. J. Simons and D. T. Levin, ‘Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction’, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 644–649, Dec. 1998 [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FBF03208840
[16]
Daniel J. Simons and Michael S. Ambinder, ‘Change Blindness: Theory and Consequences’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 44–48 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20182983
[17]
Y. Tsal and L. Kolbet, ‘Disambiguating ambiguous figures by selective attention’, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 25–37, 2AD [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14640748508400950#.Uvp1eF76kjU
[18]
A. Chaudhuri, ‘Modulation of the motion aftereffect by selective attention’, Nature, vol. 344, 3AD [Online]. Available: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v344/n6261/pdf/344060a0.pdf
[19]
G. Rees and N. Lavie, ‘What can functional imaging reveal about the role of attention in visual awareness?’, Neuropsychologia, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 1343–1353, 1AD [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393201001221
[20]
D. M. Beck, G. Rees, C. D. Frith, and N. Lavie, ‘Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness’, Nature Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 645–650, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/88477
[21]
D. Carmel, N. Lavie, and G. Rees, ‘Conscious Awareness of Flicker in Humans Involves Frontal and Parietal Cortex’, Current Biology, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 907–911, 5AD [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982206013522
[22]
G. Rees, G. Kreiman, and C. Koch, ‘Neural correlates of consciousness in humans’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 261–270, 4AD [Online]. Available: http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v3/n4/full/nrn783.html
[23]
U. Cartwright-Finch and N. Lavie, ‘The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness’, Cognition - Journal - Elsevier, 1AD [Online]. Available: http://www.icn.ucl.ac.uk/lavielab/reprints/Cartwright-Finch-Lavie.pdf
[24]
N. Lavie, ‘The role of perceptual load in visual awareness’, Brain Research, vol. 1080, no. 1, pp. 91–100, 3AD [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899305013910
[25]
N. Lavie, ‘Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 75–82, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences//retrieve/pii/S136466130400316X?_returnURL=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S136466130400316X?showall=true
[26]
N. Lavie, ‘Load Theory of Selective Attention and Cognitive Control’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 339–354 [Online]. Available: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00004785-200409000-00002&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
[27]
N. Lavie, A. Hirst, J. W. De Fockert, and E. Viding, ‘Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 339–354, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.icn.ucl.ac.uk/lavielab/reprints/Lavie-etal-04.pdf
[28]
N. Lavie and J. de Fockert, ‘The role of working memory in attentional capture’, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 669–674, 8AD [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FBF03196756#page-1
[29]
N. Lavie and J. de Fockert, ‘The role of working memory in attentional capture’, In press in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 12, no. 4. pp. 669–674, 8AD [Online]. Available: http://www.icn.ucl.ac.uk/lavielab/reprints/preprint-wm-ac.pdf
[30]
J. W. de Fockert and A. J. Bremner, ‘Release of inattentional blindness by high working memory load: Elucidating the relationship between working memory and selective attention’, Cognition, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 400–408, Dec. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027711002174
[31]
N. Lavie and J. de Fockert, ‘The role of working memory in attentional capture’, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 669–674, 8AD [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FBF03196756#page-1
[32]
N. Konstantinou, B. Bahrami, G. Rees, and N. Lavie, ‘Visual Short-term Memory Load Reduces Retinotopic Cortex Response to Contrast’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2199–2210, Nov. 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/jocn_a_00279
[33]
N. Konstantinou, B. Bahrami, G. Rees, and N. Lavie, ‘Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience’, Visual short-term memory load reduces retinotopic cortex response to contrast, vol. 24, no. 11, Nov. 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/jocn_a_00279
[34]
US National Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health, ‘PubMed.gov’, Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes., 1AD. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17129748
[35]
US National Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health, ‘PubMed.gov’, The attentional requirements of consciousness., 8AD. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=cohen nakayama cavanagh %5Bau%5D
[36]
US National Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health, ‘PubMed.gov’, Attentional load modulates responses of human primary visual cortex to invisible stimuli., 3AD. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17346967
[37]
US National Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health, ‘PubMed.gov’, Unconscious orientation processing depends on perceptual load, 3AD. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18484818
[38]
T. Yokoyama, H. Sakai, Y. Noguchi, and S. Kita, ‘Perception of Direct Gaze Does Not Require Focus of Attention’, Scientific Reports, vol. 4, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1038/srep03858.
[39]
A. M. Owen, ‘Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State’, Science, vol. 313, no. 5792, pp. 1402–1402, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.1126/science.1130197.
[40]
D. L. Greenberg, ‘Comment on “Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State”’, Science, vol. 315, no. 5816, pp. 1221b–1221b, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1126/science.1135284.
[41]
P. Nachev and M. Husain, ‘Comment on “Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State”’, Science, vol. 315, no. 5816, pp. 1221a–1221a, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1126/science.1135096.
[42]
S. M. Fleming, R. J. Dolan, and C. D. Frith, ‘Metacognition: computation, biology and function’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 367, no. 1594, pp. 1280–1286, 19AD [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3318771/
[43]
H. S. Terrace and L. K. Son, ‘Comparative metacognition’, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 67–74, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.06.004.
[44]
D. R. Griffin, ‘Animals know more than we used to think’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 98, no. 9, pp. 4833–4834, Apr. 2001, doi: 10.1073/pnas.091088198.
[45]
N. S. Narayanan, J. F. Cavanagh, M. J. Frank, and M. Laubach, ‘Common medial frontal mechanisms of adaptive control in humans and rodents’, Nature Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1888–1895 [Online]. Available: http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v16/n12/full/nn.3549.html
[46]
M. Ullsperger, A. G. Fischer, R. Nigbur, and T. Endrass, ‘Neural mechanisms and temporal dynamics of performance monitoring’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 259–267 [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661314000539
[47]
N. Yeung and C. Summerfield, ‘Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 367, no. 1594, pp. 1310–1321, May 2012 [Online]. Available: http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/367/1594/1310.abstract
[48]
C. Summerfield and N. Yeung, ‘Oh, rats! Post-error behavioral adjustment in creatures great and small’, Nature Neuroscience, vol. 16, pp. 1715–1716 [Online]. Available: http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v16/n12/full/nn.3577.html
[49]
D. D. P. Johnson and J. H. Fowler, ‘The evolution of overconfidence’, Nature, vol. 477, no. 7364, pp. 317–320 [Online]. Available: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v477/n7364/full/nature10384.html
[50]
A. Kepecs and Z. F. Mainen, ‘A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 367, no. 1594, pp. 1322–1337, May 2012 [Online]. Available: http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/367/1594/1322.full.html#ref-list-1
[51]
J. D. Smith, J. J. Couchman, and M. J. Beran, ‘The highs and lows of theoretical interpretation in animal-metacognition research’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 367, no. 1594, pp. 1297–1309, May 2012 [Online]. Available: http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/367/1594/1297.abstract
[52]
P. Carruthers, ‘Meta-cognition in Animals: A Skeptical Look’, Journal compilation. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 1AD [Online]. Available: http://faculty.philosophy.umd.edu/pcarruthers/Meta-cognition.pdf
[53]
S. M. Fleming, R. J. Dolan, and C. D. Frith, ‘Metacognition: computation, biology and function’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 367, no. 1594, pp. 1280–1286, 19AD [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3318771/
[54]
D. M. Schnyer, M. Verfaellie, M. P. Alexander, G. LaFleche, L. Nicholls, and A. W. Kaszniak, ‘A role for right medial prefrontal cortex in accurate feeling-of-knowing judgments: evidence from patients with lesions to frontal cortex’, Neuropsychologia, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 957–966, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.christofflab.ca/pdfs/2009/01/schnyer-et-al-2004.pdf
[55]
L. Festinger, ‘A Theory of Social Comparison Process’, Human Relations, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 117–140, 5AD [Online]. Available: http://kslab.kaist.ac.kr/kse612/Festinger1954.pdf
[56]
R. S. Sapolsky, ‘The Influence of Social Hierarchy on Primate Health’, Science, vol. 308, pp. 648–652, 29AD [Online]. Available: https://galileo.seas.harvard.edu/images/material/2800/1140/Sapolsky_TheInfluenceofSocialHierarchyonPrimateHealth.pdf
[57]
Education Portal, ‘Self-Comparison Theory: Upward vs. Downward Social Comparison’. [Online]. Available: http://education-portal.com/academy/lesson/self-comparison-theory-upward-vs-downward-social-comparison.html#lesson
[58]
B. Bahrami, K. Olsen, P. E. Latham, A. Roepstorff, G. Rees, and C. D. Frith, ‘Optimally interacting minds’, Science, vol. 329, no. 5995, pp. 1081–1085, 27AD [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/329/5995/1081
[59]
N. D. Wright et al., ‘Testosterone disrupts human collaboration by increasing egocentric choices’, Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society: Biological Sciences, vol. 279, no. 1736, pp. 2275–2280, 7AD [Online]. Available: http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2012/01/27/rspb.2011.2523
[60]
J. Zaki and K. Ochsner, ‘Reintegrating the Study of Accuracy Into Social Cognition Research’, Psychological Inquiry, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 159–182, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2011.551743.
[61]
A. Koriat, ‘When Are Two Heads Better than One and Why?’, Science, vol. 336, no. 6079, pp. 360–362, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1126/science.1216549.
[62]
R. Hertwig, ‘Tapping into the Wisdom of the Crowd--with Confidence’, Science, vol. 336, no. 6079, pp. 303–304, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1126/science.1221403.
[63]
J. Kruger and D. Dunning, ‘Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments’, Journal of personality and social psychology, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 1121–1134 [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10626367
[64]
F. Heider, ‘Attitudes and Cognitive Organization’, The Journal of Psychology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 107–112 [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275
[65]
R. B. Cialdini and N. J. Goldstein, ‘Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity’, Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 55, pp. 591–621 [Online]. Available: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
[66]
D. K. Campbell-Meiklejohn, D. R. Bach, A. Roepstorff, R. J. Dolan, and C. D. Frith, ‘How the Opinion of Others Affects Our Valuation of Objects’, Current Biology, vol. 20, no. 13, pp. 1165–1170, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.055.
[67]
K. Izuma and R. Adolphs, ‘Social Manipulation of Preference in the Human Brain’, Neuron, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 563–573, May 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.023.