1.
Adams, J., K.: Laboratory studies of behaviour without awareness. Psychological Bulletin. 54, 383–405 (1957).
2.
Adams, J.K.: Laboratory Studies of Behaviour Without Awareness. Psychological Bulletin. 54, (1957).
3.
Merikle, P.M., Smilek, D., Eastwood, J.D.: Perception without awareness: perspectives from cognitive psychology. Cognition. 79, 115–134 (4)AD.
4.
Raft Kunst-Wilson, W., Zajonc, R.B.: Affective Discrimination of Stimuli that cannot be Recognized. Science. 207, 557–558 (2)AD.
5.
Murphy, S.T.: Affect, Cognition, and Awareness: Affective Priming With Optimal and Suboptimal Stimulus Exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 64, 723–739.
6.
Murphy, S.T., Zajonc, R.B.: Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8505704?report=abstract.
7.
Mack, A., Rock, I.: Inattentional blindness. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2000).
8.
Most, S.B., Simons, D.J., Scholl, B.J., Jimenez, R., Clifford, E., Chabris, C.F.: How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness. PubMed.gov. 12, 9–17 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00303.
9.
Most, S.B., Simons, D.J., Sholl, B.J., Jimenez, R., Clifford, E., Chabris, C.F.: How not to be seen: the contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. PubMed.gov. 12, 9–17 (1)AD.
10.
Moore, C.M., Egeth, H.: Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance. 23, (1997).
11.
Simons, D.J., Chabris, C.F.: Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic  events. Perception. 28, 1059–1074 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1068/p2952.
12.
Simons, D.J., Chabris, C.F.: Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. PubMed.gov. 28, 1059–1074 (1999).
13.
O’Regan, J.K., Rensink, R.A., Clark, J.J.: Change-blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’. Nature. 398, (3)AD.
14.
Rensink, R.A., O’Regan, J.K., Clark, J.J.: To See or not to See: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes. Psychological Science. 8, 368–373 (1997).
15.
Simons, D.J., Levin, D.T.: Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 5, 644–649 (1998).
16.
Daniel J. Simons and Michael S. Ambinder: Change Blindness: Theory and Consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 14, 44–48.
17.
Tsal, Y., Kolbet, L.: Disambiguating ambiguous figures by selective attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 37, 25–37 (2)AD.
18.
Chaudhuri, A.: Modulation of the motion aftereffect by selective attention. Nature. 344, (3)AD.
19.
Rees, G., Lavie, N.: What can functional imaging reveal about the role of attention in visual awareness? Neuropsychologia. 39, 1343–1353 (1)AD.
20.
Beck, D.M., Rees, G., Frith, C.D., Lavie, N.: Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nature Neuroscience. 4, 645–650 (2001).
21.
Carmel, D., Lavie, N., Rees, G.: Conscious Awareness of Flicker in Humans Involves Frontal and Parietal Cortex. Current Biology. 16, 907–911 (5)AD.
22.
Rees, G., Kreiman, G., Koch, C.: Neural correlates of consciousness in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 3, 261–270 (4)AD.
23.
Cartwright-Finch, U., Lavie, N.: The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness. Cognition - Journal - Elsevier. (1)AD.
24.
Lavie, N.: The role of perceptual load in visual awareness. Brain Research. 1080, 91–100 (3)AD.
25.
Lavie, N.: Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 9, 75–82 (2005).
26.
Lavie, N.: Load Theory of Selective Attention and Cognitive Control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 133, 339–354.
27.
Lavie, N., Hirst, A., De Fockert, J.W., Viding, E.: Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 133, 339–354 (2004).
28.
Lavie, N., de Fockert, J.: The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 12, 669–674 (8)AD.
29.
Lavie, N., de Fockert, J.: The role of working memory in attentional capture, http://www.icn.ucl.ac.uk/lavielab/reprints/preprint-wm-ac.pdf, (8)AD.
30.
de Fockert, J.W., Bremner, A.J.: Release of inattentional blindness by high working memory load: Elucidating the relationship between working memory and selective attention. Cognition. 121, 400–408 (2011).
31.
Lavie, N., de Fockert, J.: The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 12, 669–674 (8)AD.
32.
Konstantinou, N., Bahrami, B., Rees, G., Lavie, N.: Visual Short-term Memory Load Reduces Retinotopic Cortex Response to Contrast. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 24, 2199–2210 (2012).
33.
Konstantinou, N., Bahrami, B., Rees, G., Lavie, N.: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Visual short-term memory load reduces retinotopic cortex response to contrast. 24, (2012).
34.
US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health: PubMed.gov, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17129748.
35.
US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health: PubMed.gov, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=cohen nakayama cavanagh %5Bau%5D.
36.
US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health: PubMed.gov, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17346967.
37.
US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health: PubMed.gov, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18484818.
38.
Yokoyama, T., Sakai, H., Noguchi, Y., Kita, S.: Perception of Direct Gaze Does Not Require Focus of Attention. Scientific Reports. 4, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03858.
39.
Owen, A.M.: Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State. Science. 313, 1402–1402 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130197.
40.
Greenberg, D.L.: Comment on ‘Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State’. Science. 315, 1221b–1221b (2007). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1135284.
41.
Nachev, P., Husain, M.: Comment on ‘Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State’. Science. 315, 1221a–1221a (2007). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1135096.
42.
Fleming, S.M., Dolan, R.J., Frith, C.D.: Metacognition: computation, biology and function. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 367, 1280–1286 (19)AD.
43.
Terrace, H.S., Son, L.K.: Comparative metacognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 19, 67–74 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2009.06.004.
44.
Griffin, D.R.: Animals know more than we used to think. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 98, 4833–4834 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.091088198.
45.
Narayanan, N.S., Cavanagh, J.F., Frank, M.J., Laubach, M.: Common medial frontal mechanisms of adaptive control in humans and rodents. Nature Neuroscience. 16, 1888–1895.
46.
Ullsperger, M., Fischer, A.G., Nigbur, R., Endrass, T.: Neural mechanisms and temporal dynamics of performance monitoring. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 18, 259–267.
47.
Yeung, N., Summerfield, C.: Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 367, 1310–1321 (2012).
48.
Summerfield, C., Yeung, N.: Oh, rats! Post-error behavioral adjustment in creatures great and small. Nature Neuroscience. 16, 1715–1716.
49.
Johnson, D.D.P., Fowler, J.H.: The evolution of overconfidence. Nature. 477, 317–320.
50.
Kepecs, A., Mainen, Z.F.: A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 367, 1322–1337 (2012).
51.
Smith, J.D., Couchman, J.J., Beran, M.J.: The highs and lows of theoretical interpretation in animal-metacognition research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 367, 1297–1309 (2012).
52.
Carruthers, P.: Meta-cognition in Animals: A Skeptical Look, http://faculty.philosophy.umd.edu/pcarruthers/Meta-cognition.pdf, (1)AD.
53.
Fleming, S.M., Dolan, R.J., Frith, C.D.: Metacognition: computation, biology and function. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 367, 1280–1286 (19)AD.
54.
Schnyer, D.M., Verfaellie, M., Alexander, M.P., LaFleche, G., Nicholls, L., Kaszniak, A.W.: A role for right medial prefrontal cortex in accurate feeling-of-knowing judgments: evidence from patients with lesions to frontal cortex. Neuropsychologia. 42, 957–966 (2004).
55.
Festinger, L.: A Theory of Social Comparison Process. Human Relations. 7, 117–140 (5)AD.
56.
Sapolsky, R.S.: The Influence of Social Hierarchy on Primate Health. Science. 308, 648–652 (29)AD.
57.
Education Portal: Self-Comparison Theory: Upward vs. Downward Social Comparison, http://education-portal.com/academy/lesson/self-comparison-theory-upward-vs-downward-social-comparison.html#lesson.
58.
Bahrami, B., Olsen, K., Latham, P.E., Roepstorff, A., Rees, G., Frith, C.D.: Optimally interacting minds. Science. 329, 1081–1085 (27)AD.
59.
Wright, N.D., Bahrami, B., Johnson, E., Di Malta, G., Rees, G., Frith, C.D., Dolan, R.J.: Testosterone disrupts human collaboration by increasing egocentric choices. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society: Biological Sciences. 279, 2275–2280 (7)AD.
60.
Zaki, J., Ochsner, K.: Reintegrating the Study of Accuracy Into Social Cognition Research. Psychological Inquiry. 22, 159–182 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2011.551743.
61.
Koriat, A.: When Are Two Heads Better than One and Why? Science. 336, 360–362 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216549.
62.
Hertwig, R.: Tapping into the Wisdom of the Crowd--with Confidence. Science. 336, 303–304 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1221403.
63.
Kruger, J., Dunning, D.: Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of personality and social psychology. 77, 1121–1134.
64.
Heider, F.: Attitudes and Cognitive Organization. The Journal of Psychology. 21, 107–112.
65.
Cialdini, R.B., Goldstein, N.J.: Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology. 55, 591–621.
66.
Campbell-Meiklejohn, D.K., Bach, D.R., Roepstorff, A., Dolan, R.J., Frith, C.D.: How the Opinion of Others Affects Our Valuation of Objects. Current Biology. 20, 1165–1170 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.055.
67.
Izuma, K., Adolphs, R.: Social Manipulation of Preference in the Human Brain. Neuron. 78, 563–573 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.023.