1.
Wenger A, Wollenmann R. Bioterrorism: Assessing a Complex Threat. Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2007. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3433704
2.
Rappert B. States of ignorance: the unmaking and remaking of death tolls. Economy and Society. 41(1):42-63. doi:10.1080/03085147.2011.637334
3.
Cole SA, Lynch M. The Social and Legal Construction of Suspects. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2(1):39-60. doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.110001
4.
Schmidt K. The Trouble with ‘Tacit Knowledge’. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 21(2-3):163-225. doi:10.1007/s10606-012-9160-8
5.
Rappert B. Disabling discourses: international law, legitimacy and the politics of balance. In: How to Look Good in a War: Justifying and Challenging State Violence. Pluto; 2012. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ad4050cb-6636-e711-80c9-005056af4099
6.
Vogel KM. Framing biosecurity: an alternative to the biotech revolution model? Science and Public Policy. 35(1):45-54. doi:10.3152/030234208X270513
7.
Paglen T. Goatsucker: toward a spatial theory of state secrecy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2010;28(5):759-771. doi:10.1068/d5308
8.
Thorpe C. Violence and the Scientific Vocation. Theory, Culture & Society. 21(3):59-84. doi:10.1177/0263276404043620
9.
McLeish C, Nightingale P. Biosecurity, bioterrorism and the governance of science: The increasing convergence of science and security policy. Research Policy. 36(10):1635-1654. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.003
10.
Edwards PN. We defend every place: building the Cold War world. In: The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America. MIT Press; 1996. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=acls;cc=acls;rgn=full%20text;idno=heb01135.0001.001;didno=heb01135.0001.001;view=image;seq=00000027;node=heb01135.0001.001%3A4
11.
Roland A. Science, Technology, and War. In: Nye MJ, ed. The Cambridge History of Science. Cambridge University Press; 2002:559-578. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521571999.031
12.
Stone J. Technology and the problem of civilian casualties in war. In: Technology and Security: Governing Threats in the New Millennium. Vol New security challenges. Palgrave Macmillan; 2007:133-151. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9ad92166-4e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
13.
Grint K, Woolgar S. What’s social about being shot. In: The Machine at Work: Technology, Work, and Organization. Polity Press; 1997:140-168. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=be24b342-6736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
14.
Thorpe C. Power and vocation. In: Oppenheimer: The Tragic Intellect. University of Chicago Press; 2006:160-199.
15.
Neyland D. Mundane terror and the threat of everyday objects. In: Technologies of inSecurity: The Surveillance of Everyday Life. Routledge-Cavendish; 2009:21-41. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6ed597bd-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
16.
Edgerton D. War. In: The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History since 1900. Profile; 2008:138-159. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d34ed39b-8d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
17.
Revill J, Edwards B. What counts as the hostile use of chemicals? In: Rappert B, Balmer B, eds. Absence in Science, Security and Policy: From Research Agendas to Global Strategy. Vol Global issues series. Palgrave Macmillan; 2015:157-179. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=20c62936-73eb-e911-80cd-005056af4099
18.
Collins H, Pinch T. A clean kill? The role of Patriot in the Gulf War. In: The Golem at Large. Cambridge University Press; 2014:7-29. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107589049
19.
Thorpe C. Violence and the Scientific Vocation. Theory, Culture & Society. 21(3):59-84. doi:10.1177/0263276404043620
20.
McLeish C, Nightingale P. Biosecurity, bioterrorism and the governance of science: The increasing convergence of science and security policy. Research Policy. 36(10):1635-1654. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.003
21.
Paglen T. Goatsucker: toward a spatial theory of state secrecy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2010;28(5):759-771. doi:10.1068/d5308
22.
Vogel KM. Framing biosecurity: an alternative to the biotech revolution model? Science and Public Policy. 35(1):45-54. doi:10.3152/030234208X270513
23.
Schmidt K. The Trouble with ‘Tacit Knowledge’. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 21(2-3):163-225. doi:10.1007/s10606-012-9160-8
24.
Cole SA, Lynch M. The Social and Legal Construction of Suspects. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2(1):39-60. doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.110001
25.
Rappert B. States of ignorance: the unmaking and remaking of death tolls. Economy and Society. 41(1):42-63. doi:10.1080/03085147.2011.637334
26.
Balmer A. Telling tales: some episodes from the multiple lives of the Polygraph machine. In: Knowledge Technology and Law. ; 2015:104-118. http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203797600
27.
Wenger A, Wollenmann R. Bioterrorism: Assessing a Complex Threat. Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2007. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3433704