[1]
A. Wenger and R. Wollenmann, Bioterrorism: Assessing a Complex Threat. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3433704
[2]
B. Rappert, ‘States of ignorance: the unmaking and remaking of death tolls’, Economy and Society, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 42–63, doi: 10.1080/03085147.2011.637334.
[3]
S. A. Cole and M. Lynch, ‘The Social and Legal Construction of Suspects’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–60, doi: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.110001.
[4]
K. Schmidt, ‘The Trouble with “Tacit Knowledge”’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 163–225, doi: 10.1007/s10606-012-9160-8.
[5]
B. Rappert, ‘Disabling discourses: international law, legitimacy and the politics of balance’, in How to look good in a war: justifying and challenging state violence, London: Pluto, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ad4050cb-6636-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[6]
K. M. Vogel, ‘Framing biosecurity: an alternative to the biotech revolution model?’, Science and Public Policy, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 45–54, doi: 10.3152/030234208X270513.
[7]
T. Paglen, ‘Goatsucker: toward a spatial theory of state secrecy’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 759–771, 2010, doi: 10.1068/d5308.
[8]
C. Thorpe, ‘Violence and the Scientific Vocation’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 59–84, doi: 10.1177/0263276404043620.
[9]
C. McLeish and P. Nightingale, ‘Biosecurity, bioterrorism and the governance of science: The increasing convergence of science and security policy’, Research Policy, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1635–1654, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.003.
[10]
P. N. Edwards, ‘We defend every place: building the Cold War world’, in The closed world: computers and the politics of discourse in Cold War America, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=acls;cc=acls;rgn=full%20text;idno=heb01135.0001.001;didno=heb01135.0001.001;view=image;seq=00000027;node=heb01135.0001.001%3A4
[11]
A. Roland, ‘Science, Technology, and War’, in The Cambridge History of Science, M. J. Nye, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 559–578 [Online]. Available: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/histories/CBO9781139053525A040
[12]
J. Stone, ‘Technology and the problem of civilian casualties in war’, in Technology and security: governing threats in the new millennium, vol. New security challenges, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp. 133–151 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9ad92166-4e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[13]
K. Grint and S. Woolgar, ‘What’s social about being shot’, in The machine at work: technology, work, and organization, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997, pp. 140–168 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=be24b342-6736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[14]
C. Thorpe, ‘Power and vocation’, in Oppenheimer: the tragic intellect, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006, pp. 160–199.
[15]
D. Neyland, ‘Mundane terror and the threat of everyday objects’, in Technologies of inSecurity: the surveillance of everyday life, Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009, pp. 21–41 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6ed597bd-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[16]
D. Edgerton, ‘War’, in The shock of the old: technology and global history since 1900, London: Profile, 2008, pp. 138–159 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d34ed39b-8d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[17]
J. Revill and B. Edwards, ‘What counts as the hostile use of chemicals?’, in Absence in science, security and policy: from research agendas to global strategy, vol. Global issues series, B. Rappert and B. Balmer, Eds. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, pp. 157–179 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=20c62936-73eb-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[18]
H. Collins and T. Pinch, ‘A clean kill? The role of Patriot in the Gulf War’, in The Golem at Large, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 7–29 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781107589049
[19]
C. Thorpe, ‘Violence and the Scientific Vocation’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 59–84, doi: 10.1177/0263276404043620.
[20]
C. McLeish and P. Nightingale, ‘Biosecurity, bioterrorism and the governance of science: The increasing convergence of science and security policy’, Research Policy, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1635–1654, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.003.
[21]
T. Paglen, ‘Goatsucker: toward a spatial theory of state secrecy’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 759–771, 2010, doi: 10.1068/d5308.
[22]
K. M. Vogel, ‘Framing biosecurity: an alternative to the biotech revolution model?’, Science and Public Policy, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 45–54, doi: 10.3152/030234208X270513.
[23]
K. Schmidt, ‘The Trouble with “Tacit Knowledge”’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 163–225, doi: 10.1007/s10606-012-9160-8.
[24]
S. A. Cole and M. Lynch, ‘The Social and Legal Construction of Suspects’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–60, doi: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.110001.
[25]
B. Rappert, ‘States of ignorance: the unmaking and remaking of death tolls’, Economy and Society, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 42–63, doi: 10.1080/03085147.2011.637334.
[26]
A. Balmer, ‘Telling tales: some episodes from the multiple lives of the Polygraph machine’, in Knowledge technology and law, 2015, pp. 104–118 [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203797600
[27]
A. Wenger and R. Wollenmann, Bioterrorism: Assessing a Complex Threat. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3433704