1
Wenger A, Wollenmann R. Bioterrorism: Assessing a Complex Threat. Boulder: : Lynne Rienner Publishers 2007. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3433704
2
Rappert B. States of ignorance: the unmaking and remaking of death tolls. Economy and Society;41:42–63. doi:10.1080/03085147.2011.637334
3
Cole SA, Lynch M. The Social and Legal Construction of Suspects. Annual Review of Law and Social Science;2:39–60. doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.110001
4
Schmidt K. The Trouble with ‘Tacit Knowledge’. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW);21:163–225. doi:10.1007/s10606-012-9160-8
5
Rappert B. Disabling discourses: international law, legitimacy and the politics of balance. In: How to look good in a war: justifying and challenging state violence. London: : Pluto 2012. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ad4050cb-6636-e711-80c9-005056af4099
6
Vogel KM. Framing biosecurity: an alternative to the biotech revolution model? Science and Public Policy;35:45–54. doi:10.3152/030234208X270513
7
Paglen T. Goatsucker: toward a spatial theory of state secrecy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2010;28:759–71. doi:10.1068/d5308
8
Thorpe C. Violence and the Scientific Vocation. Theory, Culture & Society;21:59–84. doi:10.1177/0263276404043620
9
McLeish C, Nightingale P. Biosecurity, bioterrorism and the governance of science: The increasing convergence of science and security policy. Research Policy;36:1635–54. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.003
10
Edwards PN. We defend every place: building the Cold War world. In: The closed world: computers and the politics of discourse in Cold War America. Cambridge, Mass.: : MIT Press 1996. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=acls;cc=acls;rgn=full%20text;idno=heb01135.0001.001;didno=heb01135.0001.001;view=image;seq=00000027;node=heb01135.0001.001%3A4
11
Roland A. Science, Technology, and War. In: Nye MJ, ed. The Cambridge History of Science. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002. 559–78. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521571999.031
12
Stone J. Technology and the problem of civilian casualties in war. In: Technology and security: governing threats in the new millennium. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2007. 133–51.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9ad92166-4e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
13
Grint K, Woolgar S. What’s social about being shot. In: The machine at work: technology, work, and organization. Cambridge: : Polity Press 1997. 140–68.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=be24b342-6736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
14
Thorpe C. Power and vocation. In: Oppenheimer: the tragic intellect. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2006. 160–99.
15
Neyland D. Mundane terror and the threat of everyday objects. In: Technologies of inSecurity: the surveillance of everyday life. Abingdon: : Routledge-Cavendish 2009. 21–41.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6ed597bd-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
16
Edgerton D. War. In: The shock of the old: technology and global history since 1900. London: : Profile 2008. 138–59.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d34ed39b-8d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
17
Revill J, Edwards B. What counts as the hostile use of chemicals? In: Rappert B, Balmer B, eds. Absence in science, security and policy: from research agendas to global strategy. Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2015. 157–79.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=20c62936-73eb-e911-80cd-005056af4099
18
Collins H, Pinch T. A clean kill? The role of Patriot in the Gulf War. In: The Golem at Large. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2014. 7–29. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107589049
19
Thorpe C. Violence and the Scientific Vocation. Theory, Culture & Society;21:59–84. doi:10.1177/0263276404043620
20
McLeish C, Nightingale P. Biosecurity, bioterrorism and the governance of science: The increasing convergence of science and security policy. Research Policy;36:1635–54. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.003
21
Paglen T. Goatsucker: toward a spatial theory of state secrecy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2010;28:759–71. doi:10.1068/d5308
22
Vogel KM. Framing biosecurity: an alternative to the biotech revolution model? Science and Public Policy;35:45–54. doi:10.3152/030234208X270513
23
Schmidt K. The Trouble with ‘Tacit Knowledge’. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW);21:163–225. doi:10.1007/s10606-012-9160-8
24
Cole SA, Lynch M. The Social and Legal Construction of Suspects. Annual Review of Law and Social Science;2:39–60. doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.110001
25
Rappert B. States of ignorance: the unmaking and remaking of death tolls. Economy and Society;41:42–63. doi:10.1080/03085147.2011.637334
26
Balmer A. Telling tales: some episodes from the multiple lives of the Polygraph machine. In: Knowledge technology and law. 2015. 104–18.http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203797600
27
Wenger A, Wollenmann R. Bioterrorism: Assessing a Complex Threat. Boulder: : Lynne Rienner Publishers 2007. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3433704