1.
Wenger, A. & Wollenmann, R. Bioterrorism: Assessing a Complex Threat. (Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2007).
2.
Rappert, B. States of ignorance: the unmaking and remaking of death tolls. Economy and Society 41, 42–63.
3.
Cole, S. A. & Lynch, M. The Social and Legal Construction of Suspects. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2, 39–60.
4.
Schmidt, K. The Trouble with ‘Tacit Knowledge’. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 21, 163–225.
5.
Rappert, B. Disabling discourses: international law, legitimacy and the politics of balance. in How to look good in a war: justifying and challenging state violence (Pluto, 2012).
6.
Vogel, K. M. Framing biosecurity: an alternative to the biotech revolution model? Science and Public Policy 35, 45–54.
7.
Paglen, T. Goatsucker: toward a spatial theory of state secrecy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28, 759–771 (2010).
8.
Thorpe, C. Violence and the Scientific Vocation. Theory, Culture & Society 21, 59–84.
9.
McLeish, C. & Nightingale, P. Biosecurity, bioterrorism and the governance of science: The increasing convergence of science and security policy. Research Policy 36, 1635–1654.
10.
Edwards, P. N. We defend every place: building the Cold War world. in The closed world: computers and the politics of discourse in Cold War America (MIT Press, 1996).
11.
Roland, A. Science, Technology, and War. in The Cambridge History of Science (ed. Nye, M. J.) 559–578 (Cambridge University Press, 2002). doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521571999.031.
12.
Stone, J. Technology and the problem of civilian casualties in war. in Technology and security: governing threats in the new millennium vol. New security challenges 133–151 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).
13.
Grint, K. & Woolgar, S. What’s social about being shot. in The machine at work: technology, work, and organization 140–168 (Polity Press, 1997).
14.
Thorpe, C. Power and vocation. in Oppenheimer: the tragic intellect 160–199 (University of Chicago Press, 2006).
15.
Neyland, D. Mundane terror and the threat of everyday objects. in Technologies of inSecurity: the surveillance of everyday life 21–41 (Routledge-Cavendish, 2009).
16.
Edgerton, D. War. in The shock of the old: technology and global history since 1900 138–159 (Profile, 2008).
17.
Revill, J. & Edwards, B. What counts as the hostile use of chemicals? in Absence in science, security and policy: from research agendas to global strategy (eds. Rappert, B. & Balmer, B.) vol. Global issues series 157–179 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).
18.
Collins, H. & Pinch, T. A clean kill? The role of Patriot in the Gulf War. in The Golem at Large 7–29 (Cambridge University Press, 2014). doi:10.1017/CBO9781107589049.
19.
Thorpe, C. Violence and the Scientific Vocation. Theory, Culture & Society 21, 59–84.
20.
McLeish, C. & Nightingale, P. Biosecurity, bioterrorism and the governance of science: The increasing convergence of science and security policy. Research Policy 36, 1635–1654.
21.
Paglen, T. Goatsucker: toward a spatial theory of state secrecy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28, 759–771 (2010).
22.
Vogel, K. M. Framing biosecurity: an alternative to the biotech revolution model? Science and Public Policy 35, 45–54.
23.
Schmidt, K. The Trouble with ‘Tacit Knowledge’. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 21, 163–225.
24.
Cole, S. A. & Lynch, M. The Social and Legal Construction of Suspects. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2, 39–60.
25.
Rappert, B. States of ignorance: the unmaking and remaking of death tolls. Economy and Society 41, 42–63.
26.
Balmer, A. Telling tales: some episodes from the multiple lives of the Polygraph machine. in Knowledge technology and law 104–118 (2015).
27.
Wenger, A. & Wollenmann, R. Bioterrorism: Assessing a Complex Threat. (Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2007).
