1.
Wenger A, Wollenmann R. Bioterrorism: Assessing a Complex Threat [Internet]. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2007. Available from: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3433704
2.
Rappert B. States of ignorance: the unmaking and remaking of death tolls. Economy and Society. 41(1):42–63.
3.
Cole SA, Lynch M. The Social and Legal Construction of Suspects. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2(1):39–60.
4.
Schmidt K. The Trouble with ‘Tacit Knowledge’. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 21(2–3):163–225.
5.
Rappert B. Disabling discourses: international law, legitimacy and the politics of balance. How to look good in a war: justifying and challenging state violence [Internet]. London: Pluto; 2012. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ad4050cb-6636-e711-80c9-005056af4099
6.
Vogel KM. Framing biosecurity: an alternative to the biotech revolution model? Science and Public Policy. 35(1):45–54.
7.
Paglen T. Goatsucker: toward a spatial theory of state secrecy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2010;28(5):759–771.
8.
Thorpe C. Violence and the Scientific Vocation. Theory, Culture & Society. 21(3):59–84.
9.
McLeish C, Nightingale P. Biosecurity, bioterrorism and the governance of science: The increasing convergence of science and security policy. Research Policy. 36(10):1635–1654.
10.
Edwards PN. We defend every place: building the Cold War world. The closed world: computers and the politics of discourse in Cold War America [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press; 1996. Available from: http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=acls;cc=acls;rgn=full%20text;idno=heb01135.0001.001;didno=heb01135.0001.001;view=image;seq=00000027;node=heb01135.0001.001%3A4
11.
Roland A. Science, Technology, and War. In: Nye MJ, editor. The Cambridge History of Science [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 559–578. Available from: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/histories/CBO9781139053525A040
12.
Stone J. Technology and the problem of civilian casualties in war. Technology and security: governing threats in the new millennium [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007. p. 133–151. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9ad92166-4e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
13.
Grint K, Woolgar S. What’s social about being shot. The machine at work: technology, work, and organization [Internet]. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1997. p. 140–168. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=be24b342-6736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
14.
Thorpe C. Power and vocation. Oppenheimer: the tragic intellect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2006. p. 160–199.
15.
Neyland D. Mundane terror and the threat of everyday objects. Technologies of inSecurity: the surveillance of everyday life [Internet]. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish; 2009. p. 21–41. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6ed597bd-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
16.
Edgerton D. War. The shock of the old: technology and global history since 1900 [Internet]. London: Profile; 2008. p. 138–159. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d34ed39b-8d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
17.
Revill J, Edwards B. What counts as the hostile use of chemicals? In: Rappert B, Balmer B, editors. Absence in science, security and policy: from research agendas to global strategy [Internet]. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. p. 157–179. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=20c62936-73eb-e911-80cd-005056af4099
18.
Collins H, Pinch T. A clean kill? The role of Patriot in the Gulf War. The Golem at Large [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. p. 7–29. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781107589049
19.
Thorpe C. Violence and the Scientific Vocation. Theory, Culture & Society. 21(3):59–84.
20.
McLeish C, Nightingale P. Biosecurity, bioterrorism and the governance of science: The increasing convergence of science and security policy. Research Policy. 36(10):1635–1654.
21.
Paglen T. Goatsucker: toward a spatial theory of state secrecy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2010;28(5):759–771.
22.
Vogel KM. Framing biosecurity: an alternative to the biotech revolution model? Science and Public Policy. 35(1):45–54.
23.
Schmidt K. The Trouble with ‘Tacit Knowledge’. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 21(2–3):163–225.
24.
Cole SA, Lynch M. The Social and Legal Construction of Suspects. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2(1):39–60.
25.
Rappert B. States of ignorance: the unmaking and remaking of death tolls. Economy and Society. 41(1):42–63.
26.
Balmer A. Telling tales: some episodes from the multiple lives of the Polygraph machine. Knowledge technology and law [Internet]. 2015. p. 104–118. Available from: http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203797600
27.
Wenger A, Wollenmann R. Bioterrorism: Assessing a Complex Threat [Internet]. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2007. Available from: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3433704