Balmer, Andrew, ‘Telling Tales: Some Episodes from the Multiple Lives of the Polygraph Machine’, in Knowledge Technology and Law, 2015, pp. 104–18 <http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203797600>
Cole, Simon A., and Michael Lynch, ‘The Social and Legal Construction of Suspects’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2.1, 39–60 <https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.110001>
———, ‘The Social and Legal Construction of Suspects’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2.1, 39–60 <https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.110001>
Collins, Harry, and Trevor Pinch, ‘A Clean Kill? The Role of Patriot in the Gulf War’, in The Golem at Large (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 7–29 <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589049>
Edgerton, David, ‘War’, in The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History since 1900 (London: Profile, 2008), pp. 138–59 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d34ed39b-8d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Edwards, Paul N., ‘We Defend Every Place: Building the Cold War World’, in The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996) <http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=acls;cc=acls;rgn=full%20text;idno=heb01135.0001.001;didno=heb01135.0001.001;view=image;seq=00000027;node=heb01135.0001.001%3A4>
Grint, Keith, and Steve Woolgar, ‘What’s Social about Being Shot’, in The Machine at Work: Technology, Work, and Organization (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997), pp. 140–68 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=be24b342-6736-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
McLeish, Caitríona, and Paul Nightingale, ‘Biosecurity, Bioterrorism and the Governance of Science: The Increasing Convergence of Science and Security Policy’, Research Policy, 36.10, 1635–54 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.003>
———, ‘Biosecurity, Bioterrorism and the Governance of Science: The Increasing Convergence of Science and Security Policy’, Research Policy, 36.10, 1635–54 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.003>
Neyland, Daniel, ‘Mundane Terror and the Threat of Everyday Objects’, in Technologies of inSecurity: The Surveillance of Everyday Life (Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009), pp. 21–41 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6ed597bd-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Paglen, Trevor, ‘Goatsucker: Toward a Spatial Theory of State Secrecy’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28.5 (2010), 759–71 <https://doi.org/10.1068/d5308>
———, ‘Goatsucker: Toward a Spatial Theory of State Secrecy’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28.5 (2010), 759–71 <https://doi.org/10.1068/d5308>
Rappert, Brian, ‘Disabling Discourses: International Law, Legitimacy and the Politics of Balance’, in How to Look Good in a War: Justifying and Challenging State Violence (London: Pluto, 2012) <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ad4050cb-6636-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
———, ‘States of Ignorance: The Unmaking and Remaking of Death Tolls’, Economy and Society, 41.1, 42–63 <https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2011.637334>
———, ‘States of Ignorance: The Unmaking and Remaking of Death Tolls’, Economy and Society, 41.1, 42–63 <https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2011.637334>
Revill, James, and Brett Edwards, ‘What Counts as the Hostile Use of Chemicals?’, in Absence in Science, Security and Policy: From Research Agendas to Global Strategy, ed. by Brian Rappert and Brian Balmer (Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), Global issues series, 157–79 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=20c62936-73eb-e911-80cd-005056af4099>
Roland, Alex, ‘Science, Technology, and War’, in The Cambridge History of Science, ed. by Mary Jo Nye (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 559–78 <https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521571999.031>
Schmidt, Kjeld, ‘The Trouble with “Tacit Knowledge”’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 21.2–3, 163–225 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-012-9160-8>
———, ‘The Trouble with “Tacit Knowledge”’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 21.2–3, 163–225 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-012-9160-8>
Stone, John, ‘Technology and the Problem of Civilian Casualties in War’, in Technology and Security: Governing Threats in the New Millennium (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), New security challenges, 133–51 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9ad92166-4e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Thorpe, Charles, ‘Power and Vocation’, in Oppenheimer: The Tragic Intellect (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006), pp. 160–99
———, ‘Violence and the Scientific Vocation’, Theory, Culture & Society, 21.3, 59–84 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404043620>
———, ‘Violence and the Scientific Vocation’, Theory, Culture & Society, 21.3, 59–84 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404043620>
Vogel, Kathleen M., ‘Framing Biosecurity: An Alternative to the Biotech Revolution Model?’, Science and Public Policy, 35.1, 45–54 <https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X270513>
———, ‘Framing Biosecurity: An Alternative to the Biotech Revolution Model?’, Science and Public Policy, 35.1, 45–54 <https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X270513>
Wenger, Andreas, and Reto Wollenmann, Bioterrorism: Assessing a Complex Threat (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2007) <http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3433704>
———, Bioterrorism: Assessing a Complex Threat (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2007) <http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3433704>