1
Alina Alexandra Payne. Introduction. In: Payne AA, ed. Vision and its instruments: art, science, and technology in early modern Europe. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press 2015:1–9.
2
Karen Reeds. Leonardo da Vinci and botanical illustration: nature prints, drawings, and woodcuts ca 1500. Visualizing medieval medicine and natural history, 1200-1550. Aldershot: Ashgate 2006:205–37.
3
Ackerman JS. Early Renaissance ‘Naturalism’ and Scientific Illustration. Distance points: essays in theory and Renaissance art and architecture. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press 1991:185–207.
4
Eisenstein EL. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1980.
5
Elizabeth L. Eisenstein, 1923-. The printing press as an agent of change : communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe / Vol.2 / Elizabeth L. Eisenstein.
6
Elizabeth L. Eisenstein. Defining the initial shift; some features of print culture. The printing press as an agent of change : communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe / Vol.1 / Elizabeth L. Eisenstein. 43–159.
7
Ivins, William Mills. The Road Block Broken: The Fifteenth Century. Prints and visual communication. 21–50.
8
William, Mills. Ivins Jr. The Road Block Broken-The Fifeteenth Century. Prints and visual communication. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press 1978:21–50.
9
David, Landau & Peter W. Parshall. Printed Herbals and Descriptive Botany. The Renaissance print, 1470-1550. New Haven: Yale University Press 1994:245–59.
10
Sachiko Kusukawa. Leonhart Fuchs on the Importance of Pictures. Journal of the History of Ideas. 1997;58. doi: 10.2307/3653907
11
Carlino A. Representations: An Iconographic investigation of the dissection scene. Books of the body: anatomical ritual and renaissance learning. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press 1999:8–68.
12
Park K. The Empire of Anatomy. Secrets of women: gender, generation, and the origins of human dissection. New York: Zone 2006:207–59.
13
Glenn Harcourt. Andreas Vesalius and the Anatomy of Antique Sculpture. Representations. 1987;28–61. doi: 10.2307/3043792
14
Katherine, Rowe. ‘Gods handy worke’ Divine Complicity and the Anatomist’s Touch. The Body in Parts : Fantasies of Corporeality in Early Modern Europe. Taylor and Francis 2013:285–309.
15
Wilson B. From Myth to Metropole: Sixteenth-Century Maps of Venice. The world in Venice: print, the city and early modern identity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press 2005:23–69.
16
Lucia, Nuti. The Perspective Plan in the Sixteenth Century: The Invention of a Representational Language. The Art Bulletin. 1994;76:105–28. doi: 10.2307/3046005
17
Traub V. Mapping the Global Body. Early modern visual culture: representation, race, and empire in Renaissance England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press 2000:44–97.
18
Valerie Traub. The Nature of Norms in Early Modern England: Anatomy, Cartography, ‘King Lear’. South Central Review. 2009;26:42–81.
19
Gaudio M. Savage Marks: The Scriptive Techniques of Early Modern Ethnography. Engraving the savage: the New World and techniques of civilization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 2008:1–44.
20
Gaudio M. Savage Marks: The Scriptive Techniques of Early Modern Ethnography. Engraving the savage: the New World and techniques of civilization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 2008:1–43.
21
Elke Anna Werner. Anthropomorphic Maps: On the Aesthetic Form and Political Function of Body Metaphors. In: Melion W, ed. The Anthropomorphic Lens: Anthropomorphism, Microcosmism and Analogy in Early Modern Thought and Visual Arts. Leiden ; Boston: Brill 2014:251–72.
22
San Juan RM. The Anthropomorphic Image: Negotiations of Space Between Body and Landscape. Vertiginous mirrors: the animation of the visual image and early modern travel. Manchester: Manchester University Press 2011:56–85.
23
Rublack U. Nationhood. Dressing up: cultural identity in Renaissance Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010:125–76.
24
Jill Burke. Nakedness and Other Peoples: Rethinking the Italian Renaissance Nude. Art History. 2013;36:714–39. doi: 10.1111/1467-8365.12029
25
Rosenthal MF. Fashions of Friendship in an Early Modern Illustrated Album Amicorum: British Library, MS Egerton 1191. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies. 2009;39:619–41. doi: 10.1215/10829636-2009-007
26
Koerner JL. Not Made by Human Hands. The moment of self-portraiture in German Renaissance art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1993:80–127.
27
Karr Schmidt S. Handling Religion. Interactive and Sculptural Printmaking in the Renaissance. Brill 2017:23–55.
28
Pon L. Imprint: Paper, Print, and Matrix. A Printed Icon in Early Modern Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015:39–80.
29
Bette, Talvacchia. Mythology, Sexuality and Science in Charles Estienne’s Manual of Anatomy. Taking positions: on the erotic in Renaissance culture. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press 1999:161–87.
30
Stephen, Orgel,. Textual Icons: Reading Early Modern Illustrations. In: Rhodes N, Sawday J, eds. The Renaissance computer: knowledge technology in the first age of print. London: Routledge 2000:57–92.
31
Findlen P. Anatomy Theaters, Botanical Gardens, and Natural History Collections. In: Park K, Daston L, eds. The Cambridge History of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006:272–89.
32
Margaret Iversen. The Discourse of Perspective in the Twentieth Century: Panofsky, Damisch, Lacan. Oxford Art Journal. 2005;28:193–202.
33
Kenaan H. The ‘Unusual Character’ of Holbein’s “Ambassadors”. Artibus et Historiae. 2002;23:61–75. doi: 10.2307/1483697
34
Massey L. Picturing space, displacing bodies: anamorphosis in early modern theories of perspective. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press 2007.
35
Jacques, Lacan. Anamorphosis. The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis. London: Vintage 1998:79–90.
36
Svetlana, Alpers. ‘Ut Pictura, ita visio’: Kepler’s model of the Eye and the Nature of Picturing in the North. The art of describing: Dutch art in the seventeenth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1983:26–71.
37
Svetlana, Alpers. The Mapping Impulse in Dutch Art. The art of describing: Dutch art in the seventeenth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1983:119–68.
38
Hanneke, Grootenboer. The Rhetoric of Perspective. The rhetoric of perspective: realism and illusionism in seventeenth-century Dutch still-life painting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2005:97–135.
39
Stuart, Clark. Introduction. Vanities of the eye: vision in early modern European culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007:1–8.
40
Stuart, Clark. Species, visions and values. Vanities of the eye: vision in early modern European culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007:9–38.
41
Victor Ieronim, Stoichiță, et al. Paintings, maps and mirrors. In: Pericolo L, ed. The self-aware image: an insight into early modern metapainting. London: Harvey Miller Publishers 2015:151–97.
42
Charles Dempsey. Caravaggio and the Two Naturalistic Styles: Specular vs. Macular. Caravaggio: Realism. Cranbury: University of Delaware Press 2006:91–100.
43
Wilkin RM. Figuring the Dead Descartes: Claude Clerselier’s                              (1664). Representations. 2003;83:38–66. doi: 10.1525/rep.2003.83.1.38
44
Wolloch N. Dead Animals and the Beast-Machine: seventeenth-century Netherlandish paintings of dead animals, as anti-Cartesian statements. Art History. 1999;22:705–27. doi: 10.1111/1467-8365.00183
45
Circuit-Bending History: Sketches toward a Digital Schematic. Published Online First: 2015.
46
Paul Dyck, Ryan Rempel & Stuart Williams. Digitizing Collection, Composition, and Product: Tracking the Work of Little Gidding. In: Nelson B, Terras MM, eds. Digitizing medieval and early modern material culture. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Iter in collaboration with ACMRS 2012:229–56.
47
William H, Sherman. Afterword: The Future of Past Readers. Used books: marking readers in Renaissance England. Philadelphia, Pa: University of Pennsylvania Press 2008:179–82.