[1]
Alina Alexandra Payne, ‘Introduction’, in Vision and its instruments: art, science, and technology in early modern Europe, A. A. Payne, Ed. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2015, pp. 1–9 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5bc338be-ff78-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[2]
Karen Reeds, ‘Leonardo da Vinci and botanical illustration: nature prints, drawings, and woodcuts ca 1500’, in Visualizing medieval medicine and natural history, 1200-1550, vol. AVISTA studies in the history of medieval technology, science and art, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006, pp. 205–237 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=989b2279-7f89-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[3]
J. S. Ackerman, ‘Early Renaissance “Naturalism” and Scientific Illustration’, in Distance points: essays in theory and Renaissance art and architecture, Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, 1991, pp. 185–207 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7781b4d6-8089-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[4]
E. L. Eisenstein, The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781107049963
[5]
Elizabeth L. Eisenstein, 1923-, The printing press as an agent of change : communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe / Vol.2 / Elizabeth L. Eisenstein. .
[6]
Elizabeth L. Eisenstein, ‘Defining the initial shift; some features of print culture’, in The printing press as an agent of change : communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe / Vol.1 / Elizabeth L. Eisenstein, vol. 1, pp. 43–159.
[7]
Ivins, William Mills, ‘The Road Block Broken: The Fifteenth Century’, in Prints and visual communication, pp. 21–50 [Online]. Available: https://www.fulcrum.org/epubs/8w32r584h#/6/102[xhtml00000051]!/4/1:0
[8]
William, Mills. Ivins Jr, ‘The Road Block Broken-The Fifeteenth Century’, in Prints and visual communication, Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press, 1978, pp. 21–50.
[9]
David, Landau & Peter W. Parshall, ‘Printed Herbals and Descriptive Botany’, in The Renaissance print, 1470-1550, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994, pp. 245–259 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=964a7659-fd78-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[10]
Sachiko Kusukawa, ‘Leonhart Fuchs on the Importance of Pictures’, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 58, no. 3, 1997, doi: 10.2307/3653907.
[11]
A. Carlino, ‘Representations: An Iconographic investigation of the dissection scene’, in Books of the body: anatomical ritual and renaissance learning, Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, 1999, pp. 8–68 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e74e7f8b-2f99-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[12]
K. Park, ‘The Empire of Anatomy’, in Secrets of women: gender, generation, and the origins of human dissection, New York: Zone, 2006, pp. 207–259 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=adbd2beb-f799-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[13]
Glenn Harcourt, ‘Andreas Vesalius and the Anatomy of Antique Sculpture’, Representations, no. 17, pp. 28–61, 1987, doi: 10.2307/3043792. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3043792#page_scan_tab_contents
[14]
Katherine, Rowe, ‘“Gods handy worke” Divine Complicity and the Anatomist’s Touch’, in The Body in Parts : Fantasies of Corporeality in Early Modern Europe, Taylor and Francis, 2013, pp. 285–309 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/reader.action?docID=1111756&ppg=5
[15]
B. Wilson, ‘From Myth to Metropole: Sixteenth-Century Maps of Venice’, in The world in Venice: print, the city and early modern identity, vol. Studies in book and print culture, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2005, pp. 23–69 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6bc1f26f-0079-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[16]
Lucia, Nuti, ‘The Perspective Plan in the Sixteenth Century: The Invention of a Representational Language’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 105–128, 1994, doi: 10.2307/3046005.
[17]
V. Traub, ‘Mapping the Global Body’, in Early modern visual culture: representation, race, and empire in Renaissance England, vol. New cultural studies, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000, pp. 44–97 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0664e3b1-f999-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[18]
Valerie Traub, ‘The Nature of Norms in Early Modern England: Anatomy, Cartography, “King Lear”’, South Central Review, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 42–81, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40211291?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[19]
M. Gaudio, ‘Savage Marks: The Scriptive Techniques of Early Modern Ethnography’, in Engraving the savage: the New World and techniques of civilization, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008, pp. 1–44 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.cttts63r.5
[20]
M. Gaudio, ‘Savage Marks: The Scriptive Techniques of Early Modern Ethnography.’, in Engraving the savage: the New World and techniques of civilization, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008, pp. 1–43 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.cttts63r
[21]
Elke Anna Werner, ‘Anthropomorphic Maps: On the Aesthetic Form and Political Function of Body Metaphors’, in The Anthropomorphic Lens: Anthropomorphism, Microcosmism and Analogy in Early Modern Thought and Visual Arts, W. Melion, Ed. Leiden ; Boston: Brill, 2014, pp. 251–272 [Online]. Available: https://brill.com/view/title/24727
[22]
R. M. San Juan, ‘The Anthropomorphic Image: Negotiations of Space Between Body and Landscape’, in Vertiginous mirrors: the animation of the visual image and early modern travel, vol. Rethinking art’s histories, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2011, pp. 56–85 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=81cf4fb6-862e-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[23]
U. Rublack, ‘Nationhood’, in Dressing up: cultural identity in Renaissance Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 125–176 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1850b754-f678-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[24]
Jill Burke, ‘Nakedness and Other Peoples: Rethinking the Italian Renaissance Nude’, Art History, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 714–739, 2013, doi: 10.1111/1467-8365.12029.
[25]
M. F. Rosenthal, ‘Fashions of Friendship in an Early Modern Illustrated Album Amicorum: British Library, MS Egerton 1191’, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 619–641, 2009, doi: 10.1215/10829636-2009-007.
[26]
J. L. Koerner, ‘Not Made by Human Hands’, in The moment of self-portraiture in German Renaissance art, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993, pp. 80–127 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6f4251c2-0279-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[27]
S. Karr Schmidt, ‘Handling Religion’, in Interactive and Sculptural Printmaking in the Renaissance, Brill, 2017, pp. 23–55 [Online]. Available: http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/books/b9789004354135_003
[28]
L. Pon, ‘Imprint: Paper, Print, and Matrix’, in A Printed Icon in Early Modern Italy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 39–80 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781316162293A011
[29]
Bette, Talvacchia, ‘Mythology, Sexuality and Science in Charles Estienne’s Manual of Anatomy’, in Taking positions: on the erotic in Renaissance culture, Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1999, pp. 161–187 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a91918ae-b6fa-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[30]
Stephen, Orgel, ‘Textual Icons: Reading Early Modern Illustrations’, in The Renaissance computer: knowledge technology in the first age of print, N. Rhodes and J. Sawday, Eds. London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 57–92 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781134599806/chapters/10.4324%2F9780203463307-12
[31]
P. Findlen, ‘Anatomy Theaters, Botanical Gardens, and Natural History Collections’, in The Cambridge History of Science, K. Park and L. Daston, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 272–289 [Online]. Available: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/histories/CBO9781139054010A018
[32]
Margaret Iversen, ‘The Discourse of Perspective in the Twentieth Century: Panofsky, Damisch, Lacan’, Oxford Art Journal, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 193–202, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4500016?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[33]
H. Kenaan, ‘The “Unusual Character” of Holbein’s “Ambassadors”’, Artibus et Historiae, vol. 23, no. 46, pp. 61–75, 2002, doi: 10.2307/1483697.
[34]
L. Massey, Picturing space, displacing bodies: anamorphosis in early modern theories of perspective. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007.
[35]
Jacques, Lacan, ‘Anamorphosis’, in The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis, London: Vintage, 1998, pp. 79–90 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0b6f5164-b4fa-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[36]
Svetlana, Alpers, ‘“Ut Pictura, ita visio”: Kepler’s model of the Eye and the Nature of Picturing in the North’, in The art of describing: Dutch art in the seventeenth century, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983, pp. 26–71.
[37]
Svetlana, Alpers, ‘The Mapping Impulse in Dutch Art’, in The art of describing: Dutch art in the seventeenth century, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983, pp. 119–168 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3432d9ac-abfa-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[38]
Hanneke, Grootenboer, ‘The Rhetoric of Perspective’, in The rhetoric of perspective: realism and illusionism in seventeenth-century Dutch still-life painting, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005, pp. 97–135.
[39]
Stuart, Clark, ‘Introduction’, in Vanities of the eye: vision in early modern European culture, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 1–8.
[40]
Stuart, Clark, ‘Species, visions and values’, in Vanities of the eye: vision in early modern European culture, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 9–38.
[41]
Victor Ieronim, Stoichiță, et al, ‘Paintings, maps and mirrors’, in The self-aware image: an insight into early modern metapainting, New, Improved, and Updated edition., L. Pericolo, Ed. London: Harvey Miller Publishers, 2015, pp. 151–197.
[42]
Charles Dempsey, ‘Caravaggio and the Two Naturalistic Styles: Specular vs. Macular’, in Caravaggio: Realism, Cranbury: University of Delaware Press, 2006, pp. 91–100.
[43]
R. M. Wilkin, ‘Figuring the Dead Descartes: Claude Clerselier’s                              (1664)’, Representations, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 38–66, Aug. 2003, doi: 10.1525/rep.2003.83.1.38.
[44]
N. Wolloch, ‘Dead Animals and the Beast-Machine: seventeenth-century Netherlandish paintings of dead animals, as anti-Cartesian statements’, Art History, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 705–727, Dec. 1999, doi: 10.1111/1467-8365.00183.
[45]
‘Circuit-Bending History: Sketches toward a Digital Schematic’, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=7120878
[46]
Paul Dyck, Ryan Rempel & Stuart Williams, ‘Digitizing Collection, Composition, and Product: Tracking the Work of Little Gidding’, in Digitizing medieval and early modern material culture, vol. volume 3, B. Nelson and M. M. Terras, Eds. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Iter in collaboration with ACMRS, 2012, pp. 229–256.
[47]
William H, Sherman, ‘Afterword: The Future of Past Readers’, in Used books: marking readers in Renaissance England, Philadelphia, Pa: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008, pp. 179–182 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f1de2fce-bc10-e811-80cd-005056af4099