1.
Alina Alexandra Payne: Introduction. In: Payne, A.A. (ed.) Vision and its instruments: art, science, and technology in early modern Europe. pp. 1–9. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania (2015).
2.
Karen Reeds: Leonardo da Vinci and botanical illustration: nature prints, drawings, and woodcuts ca 1500. In: Visualizing medieval medicine and natural history, 1200-1550. pp. 205–237. Ashgate, Aldershot (2006).
3.
Ackerman, J.S.: Early Renaissance ‘Naturalism’ and Scientific Illustration. In: Distance points: essays in theory and Renaissance art and architecture. pp. 185–207. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA (1991).
4.
Eisenstein, E.L.: The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1980). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107049963.
5.
Elizabeth L. Eisenstein, 1923-: The printing press as an agent of change : communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe / Vol.2 / Elizabeth L. Eisenstein.
6.
Elizabeth L. Eisenstein: Defining the initial shift; some features of print culture. In: The printing press as an agent of change : communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe / Vol.1 / Elizabeth L. Eisenstein. pp. 43–159.
7.
Ivins, William Mills: The Road Block Broken: The Fifteenth Century. In: Prints and visual communication. pp. 21–50.
8.
William, Mills. Ivins Jr: The Road Block Broken-The Fifeteenth Century. In: Prints and visual communication. pp. 21–50. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass (1978).
9.
David, Landau & Peter W. Parshall: Printed Herbals and Descriptive Botany. In: The Renaissance print, 1470-1550. pp. 245–259. Yale University Press, New Haven (1994).
10.
Sachiko Kusukawa: Leonhart Fuchs on the Importance of Pictures. Journal of the History of Ideas. 58, (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/3653907.
11.
Carlino, A.: Representations: An Iconographic investigation of the dissection scene. In: Books of the body: anatomical ritual and renaissance learning. pp. 8–68. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill (1999).
12.
Park, K.: The Empire of Anatomy. In: Secrets of women: gender, generation, and the origins of human dissection. pp. 207–259. Zone, New York (2006).
13.
Glenn Harcourt: Andreas Vesalius and the Anatomy of Antique Sculpture. Representations. 28–61 (1987). https://doi.org/10.2307/3043792.
14.
Katherine, Rowe: ‘Gods handy worke’ Divine Complicity and the Anatomist’s Touch. In: The Body in Parts : Fantasies of Corporeality in Early Modern Europe. pp. 285–309. Taylor and Francis (2013).
15.
Wilson, B.: From Myth to Metropole: Sixteenth-Century Maps of Venice. In: The world in Venice: print, the city and early modern identity. pp. 23–69. University of Toronto Press, Toronto (2005).
16.
Lucia, Nuti: The Perspective Plan in the Sixteenth Century: The Invention of a Representational Language. The Art Bulletin. 76, 105–128 (1994). https://doi.org/10.2307/3046005.
17.
Traub, V.: Mapping the Global Body. In: Early modern visual culture: representation, race, and empire in Renaissance England. pp. 44–97. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia (2000).
18.
Valerie Traub: The Nature of Norms in Early Modern England: Anatomy, Cartography, ‘King Lear’. South Central Review. 26, 42–81 (2009).
19.
Gaudio, M.: Savage Marks: The Scriptive Techniques of Early Modern Ethnography. In: Engraving the savage: the New World and techniques of civilization. pp. 1–44. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2008).
20.
Gaudio, M.: Savage Marks: The Scriptive Techniques of Early Modern Ethnography. In: Engraving the savage: the New World and techniques of civilization. pp. 1–43. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2008).
21.
Elke Anna Werner: Anthropomorphic Maps: On the Aesthetic Form and Political Function of Body Metaphors. In: Melion, W. (ed.) The Anthropomorphic Lens: Anthropomorphism, Microcosmism and Analogy in Early Modern Thought and Visual Arts. pp. 251–272. Brill, Leiden ; Boston (2014). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004275034_012.
22.
San Juan, R.M.: The Anthropomorphic Image: Negotiations of Space Between Body and Landscape. In: Vertiginous mirrors: the animation of the visual image and early modern travel. pp. 56–85. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2011).
23.
Rublack, U.: Nationhood. In: Dressing up: cultural identity in Renaissance Europe. pp. 125–176. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
24.
Jill Burke: Nakedness and Other Peoples: Rethinking the Italian Renaissance Nude. Art History. 36, 714–739 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8365.12029.
25.
Rosenthal, M.F.: Fashions of Friendship in an Early Modern Illustrated Album Amicorum: British Library, MS Egerton 1191. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies. 39, 619–641 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1215/10829636-2009-007.
26.
Koerner, J.L.: Not Made by Human Hands. In: The moment of self-portraiture in German Renaissance art. pp. 80–127. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1993).
27.
Karr Schmidt, S.: Handling Religion. In: Interactive and Sculptural Printmaking in the Renaissance. pp. 23–55. Brill (2017). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004354135_003.
28.
Pon, L.: Imprint: Paper, Print, and Matrix. In: A Printed Icon in Early Modern Italy. pp. 39–80. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316162293.003.
29.
Bette, Talvacchia: Mythology, Sexuality and Science in Charles Estienne’s Manual of Anatomy. In: Taking positions: on the erotic in Renaissance culture. pp. 161–187. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J (1999).
30.
Stephen, Orgel,: Textual Icons: Reading Early Modern Illustrations. In: Rhodes, N. and Sawday, J. (eds.) The Renaissance computer: knowledge technology in the first age of print. pp. 57–92. Routledge, London (2000).
31.
Findlen, P.: Anatomy Theaters, Botanical Gardens, and Natural History Collections. In: Park, K. and Daston, L. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Science. pp. 272–289. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521572446.013.
32.
Margaret Iversen: The Discourse of Perspective in the Twentieth Century: Panofsky, Damisch, Lacan. Oxford Art Journal. 28, 193–202 (2005).
33.
Kenaan, H.: The ‘Unusual Character’ of Holbein’s “Ambassadors”. Artibus et Historiae. 23, 61–75 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2307/1483697.
34.
Massey, L.: Picturing space, displacing bodies: anamorphosis in early modern theories of perspective. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, Pa (2007).
35.
Jacques, Lacan: Anamorphosis. In: The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis. pp. 79–90. Vintage, London (1998).
36.
Svetlana, Alpers: ‘Ut Pictura, ita visio’: Kepler’s model of the Eye and the Nature of Picturing in the North. In: The art of describing: Dutch art in the seventeenth century. pp. 26–71. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1983).
37.
Svetlana, Alpers: The Mapping Impulse in Dutch Art. In: The art of describing: Dutch art in the seventeenth century. pp. 119–168. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1983).
38.
Hanneke, Grootenboer: The Rhetoric of Perspective. In: The rhetoric of perspective: realism and illusionism in seventeenth-century Dutch still-life painting. pp. 97–135. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2005).
39.
Stuart, Clark: Introduction. In: Vanities of the eye: vision in early modern European culture. pp. 1–8. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
40.
Stuart, Clark: Species, visions and values. In: Vanities of the eye: vision in early modern European culture. pp. 9–38. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
41.
Victor Ieronim, Stoichiță, et al: Paintings, maps and mirrors. In: Pericolo, L. (ed.) The self-aware image: an insight into early modern metapainting. pp. 151–197. Harvey Miller Publishers, London (2015).
42.
Charles Dempsey: Caravaggio and the Two Naturalistic Styles: Specular vs. Macular. In: Caravaggio: Realism. pp. 91–100. University of Delaware Press, Cranbury (2006).
43.
Wilkin, R.M.: Figuring the Dead Descartes: Claude Clerselier’s                              (1664). Representations. 83, 38–66 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2003.83.1.38.
44.
Wolloch, N.: Dead Animals and the Beast-Machine: seventeenth-century Netherlandish paintings of dead animals, as anti-Cartesian statements. Art History. 22, 705–727 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8365.00183.
45.
Circuit-Bending History: Sketches toward a Digital Schematic. (2015).
46.
Paul Dyck, Ryan Rempel & Stuart Williams: Digitizing Collection, Composition, and Product: Tracking the Work of Little Gidding. In: Nelson, B. and Terras, M.M. (eds.) Digitizing medieval and early modern material culture. pp. 229–256. Iter in collaboration with ACMRS, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (2012).
47.
William H, Sherman: Afterword: The Future of Past Readers. In: Used books: marking readers in Renaissance England. pp. 179–182. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, Pa (2008).