[1]
Advisory Group on Citizenship 22AD. Crick Report: Education for Citizenship and the Teaching of Democracy in Schools.
[2]
Andrew Healy and Neil Malhotra ‘Myopic Voters and Natural Disaster Policy’. The American Political Science Review. 103, 3, 387–406.
[3]
Andrews, R. and Boyne, G.A. Size, Structure and Administrative Overheads: An Empirical Analysis of English Local Authorities. Urban Studies. 46, 4, 739–759. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009102127.
[4]
‘Angry remain voter? Now you know how working-class people feel’ - The Guardian: 7AD. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/07/angry-remain-voter-working-class-division-britain.
[5]
Archibugi, D. et al. eds. 2011. Global Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
[6]
Arend Lijphart 2012. Electoral Systems: Majority and Plurality Methods Versus Proportional Representation. Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. Yale University Press. 130–157.
[7]
Baltrunaite, A. et al. ‘Gender quotas and the quality of politicians’. Journal of Public Economics. 118, 62–74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.06.008.
[8]
Banducci, S.A. et al. ‘Minority Representation, Empowerment, and Participation’. The Journal of Politics. 66, 2, 534–556. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00163.x.
[9]
Barber, B.R. ‘Can Democracy Survive Globalization?’ Government and Opposition. 35, 3, 275–301.
[10]
Bardhan, P. and Mukherjee, D. 2006. ‘Decentralization, Corruption, and Government Accountability’. International handbook on the economics of corruption. Edward Elgar. 161–188.
[11]
Benjamin R. Barber Can Democracy Survive Globalization? Government and Opposition. 35, 3, 275–301. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-7053.00029.
[12]
Benz, M. and Stutzer, A. ‘Are Voters Better Informed When They Have a Larger Say in Politics? – Evidence for the European Union and Switzerland’. Public Choice. 119, 1/2, 31–59. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PUCH.0000024161.44798.ef.
[13]
Berinsky, A.J. The Perverse Consequences of Electoral Reform in the United States. American Politics Research. 33, 4, 471–491. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X04269419.
[14]
‘Beyond the Vote, The Crisis of Representative Democracy’, ROAR Magazine: 14AD. https://roarmag.org/essays/beyond-the-vote-the-crisis-of-representative-democracy/.
[15]
van Biezen, I. et al. ‘Going, going, ... gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe’. European Journal of Political Research. 51, 1, 24–56. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01995.x.
[16]
van Biezen, I. ‘Political Parties as Public Utilities’. Party Politics. 10, 6, 701–722. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068804046914.
[17]
Birch, S. ‘Electoral Systems and Electoral Misconduct’. Comparative Political Studies. 40, 12, 1533–1556. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006292886.
[18]
Blais, A. and Bodet, M.A. ‘Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence Between Citizens and Policy Makers?’ Comparative Political Studies. 39, 10, 1243–1262. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005284374.
[19]
Blais, A. and Rubenson, D. ‘The Source of Turnout Decline: New Values or New Contexts?’ Comparative Political Studies. 46, 1, 95–117. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012453032.
[20]
Blom-Hansen, J. et al. ‘Size, Democracy, and the Economic Costs of Running the Political System’. American Journal of Political Science. 58, 4, 790–803. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12096.
[21]
Böker, M. 22AD. ‘Justification, critique and deliberative legitimacy: The limits of mini-publics’. Contemporary Political Theory. (22AD). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2016.11.
[22]
‘Book Review: Called to Account: How Corporate Bad Behaviour and Government Waste Combine to Cost Us Millions, by Margaret Hodge’ - LSE Review of Books: 16AD. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2016/09/16/book-review-called-to-account-how-corporate-bad-behaviour-and-government-waste-combine-to-cost-us-millions-by-margaret-hodge/.
[23]
Bowler, S. and Donovan, T. 2013. The Limits of Electoral Reform. Oxford University Press.
[24]
Brandenburg, H. and Johns, R. ‘The Declining Representativeness of the British Party System, and Why It Matters’. Political Studies. 62, 4, 704–725. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12050.
[25]
Brett, W. ‘It’s Good to Talk: Doing Referendums Differently after the EU Vote’ - Electoral Reform Society report.
[26]
‘Brexit voters are not thick, not racist: just poor’ - The Spectator: 2AD. http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/07/brexit-voters-are-not-thick-not-racist-just-poor/.
[27]
British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform 2004. Making Every Vote Count: The Case for Electoral Reform in British Columbia.
[28]
Bruce Ackerman and James S. Fishkin 2003. Deliberation Day. Debating Deliberative Democracy. J.S. Fishkin and P. Laslett, eds. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 7–30.
[29]
Burden, B.C. et al. ‘Election Laws, Mobilization, and Turnout: The Unanticipated Consequences of Election Reform’. American Journal of Political Science. 58, 1, 95–109. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12063.
[30]
Caluwaerts, D. et al. ‘Deliberative Democracy and the So What Question: The Effects of Belgium’s G1000’ - paper delivered at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, 2016.
[31]
Carnes, N. ‘Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter?’ Legislative Studies Quarterly. 37, 1, 5–34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00033.x.
[32]
Cerny, P.G. ‘Globalization and the erosion of democracy’. European Journal of Political Research. 36, 1, 1–26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00461.
[33]
Chad Flanders ‘Deliberative Dilemmas: A Critique of Deliberation Day from the Perspective of Election Law’. Journal of Law & Politics. 23, 2, 147–170.
[34]
Chantal Mouffe ‘Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?’ Social Research. 66, 3, 745–758.
[35]
Charles A. Kupchan ‘The Democratic Malaise: Globalization and the Threat to the West’. Foreign Affairs. 91, 1, 62–67.
[36]
Christin, T. et al. Interests and information in referendum voting: An analysis of Swiss voters. European Journal of Political Research. 41, 6, 759–776. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.t01-1-00030.
[37]
Clarke, H.D. et al. ‘Why Britain Voted for Brexit: An Individual-Level Analysis of hte 2016 Referendum Vote’ - paper presented at the EPOP Conference.
[38]
Clicktivism is ruining leftist activism: 2010. https://www.micahmwhite.com/clicktivism-seminal-essay/.
[39]
Cooke, M. Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy. Political Studies. 48, 5, 947–969. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00289.
[40]
Crepaz, M.M.L. ‘Veto Players, Globalization and the Redistributive Capacity of the State: A Panel Study of 15 OECD Countries’. Journal of Public Policy. 21, 1, 1–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X01001015.
[41]
Crick, B. ‘The Presuppositions of Citizenship Education’. Journal of the Philosophy of Education. 33, 3, 337–352. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00141.
[42]
Crozier, M.J. et al. 1975. ‘The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission’. New York University Press.
[43]
Curran, J. et al. ‘Media System, Public Knowledge and Democracy: A Comparative Study’. European Journal of Communication. 24, 1, 5–26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323108098943.
[44]
Dahl, R.A. 1999. ‘Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic’s view’ (1999). Democracy’s Edges. I. Shapiro and C. Hacker-Cordon, eds. Cambridge University Press. 19–36.
[45]
Dahl, R.A. and Tufte, E.R. 1974. Size and democracy. Stanford University Press.
[46]
Dahlerup, D. ‘Electoral Gender Quotas: Between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result’. Representation. 43, 2, 73–92. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890701363227.
[47]
Dalton, R.J. ‘Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation’. Political Studies. 56, 1, 76–98. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x.
[48]
David Schkade, Cass R. Sunstein and Reid Hastie What Happened on Deliberation Day? California Law Review. 95, 3, 915–940.
[49]
De Paola, M. et al. ‘Can gender quotas break down negative stereotypes? Evidence from changes in electoral rules’. Journal of Public Economics. 94, 5–6, 344–353. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.02.004.
[50]
‘Don’t blame “the media” for the state of the referendum campaign’ - LSE blog: 23AD. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2016/06/23/dont-blame-the-media-for-the-state-of-the-referendum-campaign/.
[51]
Drazen, A. ‘The Political Business Cycle After 25 Years’. NBER Macroeconomics Annual. 15.
[52]
Dryzek, J.S. Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia. Political Theory. 33, 2, 218–242. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591704268372.
[53]
Elster, J. 1998. Introduction. Deliberative Democracy. J. Elster, ed. Cambridge University Press. 1–18.
[54]
‘Everyone Gets It Wrong About Donald Trump and White Voters’ - Rolling Stone: 1AD. http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/everyone-gets-it-wrong-about-donald-trump-and-white-voters-w437410.
[55]
FactCheck: http://www.factcheck.org/.
[56]
‘Fact-checking and the EU referendum’ - Constitution Unit Blog: 23AD. https://constitution-unit.com/2016/08/23/fact-checking-and-the-eu-referendum/.
[57]
‘Fact-checking and the EU referendum’ - The Constitution Unit Blog: 23AD. https://constitution-unit.com/2016/08/23/fact-checking-and-the-eu-referendum/.
[58]
‘Fact-checking matters - here are 6 metrics to help prove it’, Poynter: 30AD. http://www.poynter.org/2016/fact-checking-matters-here-are-6-metrics-to-help-prove-it/400582/.
[59]
Farrell, D.M. 2011. Electoral systems: a comparative introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
[60]
Faulks, K. ‘Education for citizenship in England’s secondary schools: a critique of current principle and practice’. Journal of Education Policy. 21, 1, 59–74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500391546.
[61]
Feld, L.P. et al. ‘The Effect of Direct Democracy on Income Redistribution: Evidence for Switzerland’. Economic Inquiry. 48, 4, 817–840. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00174.x.
[62]
Fisman, R. and Gatti, R. ‘Decentralization and corruption: evidence across countries’. Journal of Public Economics. 83, 3, 325–345. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00158-4.
[63]
Fjeldstad, O.-H. 2004. ‘Decentralisation and corruption. A review of the literature’ - CMI Working Paper, 2004. Chr. Michelsen Institute.
[64]
‘Former BBC head Mark Thompson on Trump, Orwell and what’s gone wrong with political language’, Daily Telegraph: 26AD. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/books/what-to-read/former-bbc-head-mark-thompson-on-trump-orwell-and-whats-gone-wro/.
[65]
Franzese, R.J. 2002. ‘Electoral and Partisan Cycles and Economic Policies and Outcomes’. Annual Review of Political Science. 5, (2002), 369–421. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.112801.080924.
[66]
Frazer, E. ‘Citizenship Education: Anti-Political Culture and Political Education in Britain’. Political Studies. 48, 1, 88–103. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00252.
[67]
‘From Trump to Brexit rhetoric: how today’s politicians have got away with words’ - The Guardian: 27AD. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/aug/27/from-trump-to-brexit-rhetoric-how-todays-politicians-have-got-away-with-words.
[68]
Full Fact: https://fullfact.org/.
[69]
Fung, Archon ‘Deliberation day’ (book review). Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 24, 2, 472–476.
[70]
Gambetta, D. and Warner, S. ‘The rhetoric of reform revealed (or: If you bite the ballot it may bite back)’. Journal of Modern Italian Studies. 1, 3, 357–376. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13545719608454924.
[71]
Garland, J. and Terry, C. The 2017 General Election: Volatile voting, random results.
[72]
Gay, C. The Effect of Black Congressional Representation on Political Participation. American Political Science Review. 95, 3, 589–602. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401003021.
[73]
Geboers, E. et al. ‘Review of the effects of citizenship education’. Educational Research Review. 9, 158–173. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.02.001.
[74]
‘Gender, Candidate Portrayals and Election Campaigns: A Comparative Perspective’: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-gender/article/gender-candidate-portrayals-and-election-campaigns-a-comparative-perspective/8A5043A6EFB2D46A138874AB77793C22.
[75]
Gerry Stoker ‘The Myth of Democratic Myopia’ - paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Glasgow, September 2014.
[76]
Gibson, R. and Cantijoch, M. ‘Conceptualizing and Measuring Participation in the Age of the Internet: Is Online Political Engagement Really Different to Offline?’ The Journal of Politics. 75, 3, 701–716. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000431.
[77]
Golder, M. and Lloyd, G. ‘Re-evaluating the relationship between electoral rules and ideological congruence’. European Journal of Political Research. 53, 1, 200–212. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12031.
[78]
Goodhart, M. Civil society and the problem of global democracy. Democratization. 12, 1, 1–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1351034052000331072.
[79]
Goodhart, M. ‘Democracy, Globalization, and the Problem of the State’. Polity. 33, 4. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3235515.
[80]
Gottfried, J.A. et al. Did Fact Checking Matter in the 2012 Presidential Campaign? American Behavioral Scientist. 57, 11, 1558–1567. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213489012.
[81]
Graham Smith 2014. ‘(Not) Dealing with Climate Change: Democracy, Institutional Design, and the Long-Term’ - paper prepared for the Political Studies Association Annual Conference, 2014.
[82]
Gray, M. and Caul, M. ‘Declining Voter Turnout in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1950 to 1997’: The Effects of Declining Group Mobilization. Comparative Political Studies. 33, 9, 1091–1122. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414000033009001.
[83]
Green-Pedersen, C. and Stubager, R. ‘The Political Conditionality of Mass Media Influence: When Do Parties Follow Mass Media Attention?’ British Journal of Political Science. 40, 3, 663–677.
[84]
Hahn, C.L. ‘Citizenship Education: An empirical study of policy, practices and outcomes’. Oxford Review of Education. 25, 1–2, 231–250. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/030549899104233.
[85]
Halupka, M. Clicktivism: A Systematic Heuristic. Policy & Internet. 6, 2, 115–132. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI355.
[86]
Hansen, S.W. ‘Polity Size and Local Political Trust: A Quasi-experiment Using Municipal Mergers in Denmark’. Scandinavian Political Studies. 36, 1, 43–66. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2012.00296.x.
[87]
‘Has the rise of middle class politicians led to the decline of class voting in Britain?’ - British Politics and Policy at LSE blog: 12AD. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/the-rise-of-middle-class-politicians-and-the-decline-of-class-voting-in-britain/.
[88]
Hay, C. ‘What’s Globalization Got to Do with It? Economic Interdependence and the Future of European Welfare States’. Government and Opposition. 41, 1, 1–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2006.00168.x.
[89]
Hay, C. and Rosamond, B. ‘Globalization, European integration and the discursive construction of economic imperatives’. Journal of European Public Policy. 9, 2, 147–167. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110120192.
[90]
Heater, D. ‘The History of Citizenship Education: A Comparative Outline’. Parliamentary Affairs. 55, 3, 457–474.
[91]
Hibbing, J.R. and Theiss-Morse, E. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work. Cambridge University Press.
[92]
‘How did the language of politics get so toxic?’, The Guardian: 31AD. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/31/how-did-the-language-of-politics-get-so-toxic.
[93]
‘How Donald Trump seduced America’s white working class’ - The Guardian: 11AD. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/10/jd-vance-hillbilly-elegy-donald-trump-us-white-poor-working-class.
[94]
‘How the “post-truth” election has put a strain on America’s fact-checkers’ - Vice News: 19AD. https://news.vice.com/story/how-the-post-truth-election-has-put-a-strain-on-americas-fact-checkers.
[95]
Iris Marion Young ‘Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy’. Political Theory. 29, 5, 670–690.
[96]
Iris Marion Young 2000. ‘Self-Determination and Global Democracy: A Critique of Liberal Nationalism’. Nomos. 42, (2000), 147–183.
[97]
‘Is democracy in crisis? No, there’s just a new type of emerging democracy’, openDemocracy blog: 20AD. https://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/hendrik-wagenaar/is-democracy-in-crisis-no-there%E2%80%99s-just-new-type-of-emerging-democracy.
[98]
‘It’s not just Trump: Authoritarian populism is rising across the West: Here’s why’ - The Washington Post: 11AD. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/03/11/its-not-just-trump-authoritarian-populism-is-rising-across-the-west-heres-why/.
[99]
Jan Erik Hall ‘Paris Agreement on Climate Change: A Diplomatic Triumph – How Can It Succeed?’ New Global Studies. 10, 2, 175–181. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2016-0012.
[100]
John Gastil et al. 2014. ‘Vicarious Deliberation: How the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review Influenced Deliberation in Mass Elections’. International Journal of Communication. 8, (2014), 62–89.
[101]
Johnson, D. et al. eds. EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. CSJCC (Bournmouth University), CRCC (Loughborough University), and Political Studies Association.
[102]
Johnson, D. et al. eds. EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. CSJCC (Bournmouth University), CRCC (Loughborough University), and Political Studies Association.
[103]
Johnson, L. and Morris, P. ‘Towards a framework for critical citizenship education’. The Curriculum Journal. 21, 1, 77–96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170903560444.
[104]
Jonathan Boston 1987. Electoral reform in New Zealand: The report of the Royal Commission. Electoral Studies. 6, 2 (Aug. 1987), 105–114. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(87)90017-5.
[105]
Joseph N. Cappella and Kathleen Hall Jamieson ‘News Frames, Political Cynicism, and Media Cynicism’. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 546, 71–84.
[106]
Karpf, D. ‘Online Political Mobilization from the Advocacy Group’s Perspective: Looking Beyond Clicktivism’. Policy & Internet. 2, 4, 7–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1098.
[107]
Katz, Richard S ‘Electoral Reform in Italy: Expectations and Results’. Acta Politica. 41, 3, 285–299.
[108]
Keating, A. et al. Citizenship Education in England 2001-2010: Young People’s Practices and Prospects for the Future: The Eighth and Final Report from the Citizenship Education Longitudinal Study (CELS). Department for Education.
[109]
Knut Heidar 2006. Party Membership and Participation. Handbook of Party Politics. Sage. 301–315.
[110]
Koenig-Archibugi, M. 2011. ‘Is global democracy possible?’ European Journal of International Relations. 17, 3 (Sep. 2011), 519–542. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110366056.
[111]
Kymlicka, W. 2001. ‘Education for Citizenship’. Politics in the Vernacular. Oxford University Press. 293–316.
[112]
Lafont, C. ‘Deliberation, Participation, and Democratic Legitimacy: Should Deliberative Mini-publics Shape Public Policy?’ Journal of Political Philosophy. 23, 1, 40–63. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12031.
[113]
LeDuc, L. ‘Referendums and deliberative democracy’. Electoral Studies. 38, 139–148. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.02.007.
[114]
LeDuc, L. 2003. The politics of direct democracy: referendums in global perspective. Broadview Press.
[115]
Lewis, P.G. ‘Size and Local Democracy: Scale Effects in City Politics’. PS: Political Science and Politics. 44, 1, 107–109.
[116]
Lijphart, A. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems. Oxford University Press.
[117]
Lijphart, A. ‘Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma’. American Political Science Review. 91, 1, 1–14.
[118]
Loader, B.D. et al. The networked young citizen: social media, political participation and civic engagement. Information, Communication & Society. 17, 2, 143–150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.871571.
[119]
Lowndes, V. and Sullivan, H. How Low Can You Go? Rationales and Challenges for Neighbourhood Governance. Public Administration. 86, 1, 53–74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00696.x.
[120]
Lupia, Arthur ‘Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections’. The American Political Science Review. 88, 1.
[121]
Lutz, G. ‘The Interaction between Direct and Representative Democracy in Switzerland’. Representation. 42, 1, 45–57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890600583776.
[122]
Lutz, G. and Marsh, M. ‘Introduction: Consequences of low turnout’. Electoral Studies. 26, 3, 539–547. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2006.10.001.
[123]
Matthew Flinders ‘The Blunders of Our Governments, by Anthony King and Ivor Crewe - book review’. Governance. 27, 2, 357–361.
[124]
McKnight, D. ‘Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation: A Media Institution with A Mission’. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television. 30, 3, 303–316. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01439685.2010.505021.
[125]
Mclaughlin, T.H. ‘Citizenship Education in England: The Crick Report and Beyond’. Journal of the Philosophy of Education. 34, 4, 541–570. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00194.
[126]
‘Media Coverage of the EU Referendum (Report 5)’ Centre for Research in Communication and Culture: 27AD. http://blog.lboro.ac.uk/crcc/eu-referendum/uk-news-coverage-2016-eu-referendum-report-5-6-may-22-june-2016/.
[127]
‘Men Writing about Men: Media and the UK General Election 2015’, Loughborough University Communication Research Centre: 22AD. http://blog.lboro.ac.uk/crcc/general-election/men-writing-about-men-media-and-the-uk-general-election-2015/.
[128]
Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky ‘Send the rascals packing: Defects of proportional representation and the virtues of the Westminster model’. Representation. 36, 2, 117–126.
[129]
Miller, D. 2010. ‘Against Global Democracy’. After the nation?: critical reflections on nationalism and post-nationalism. Palgrave Macmillan. 141–160.
[130]
Miller, D. ‘Democracy’s Domain’. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 37, 3, 201–228. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01158.x.
[131]
Mueller, D.C. and Stratmann, T. ‘The economic effects of democratic participation’. Journal of Public Economics. 87, 9–10, 2129–2155. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00046-4.
[132]
Newton, K. Is Small Really So Beautiful? Is Big Really So Ugly? Size, Effectiveness, and Democracy in Local Government. Political Studies. 30, 2, 190–206.
[133]
Niemeyer, S. ‘The Emancipatory Effect of Deliberation: Empirical Lessons from Mini-Publics’. Politics & Society. 39, 1, 103–140. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329210395000.
[134]
Norris, P. 2002. Conclusions: The Reinvention of Political Activism? Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge University Press. 215–224.
[135]
Norris, P. 2011. Democratic Hopes and Fears. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge University Press. 3–18.
[136]
Norris, P. 2011. Negative News. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge University Press. 169–187.
[137]
Norris, Pippa ‘The Impact of Electoral Reform on Women’s Representation’. Acta Politica, suppl. Special issue: the dutch electoral system on trial. 41, 2, 197–213.
[138]
Nyhan, B. and Reifler, J. Misinformation and Fact-checking: Research Findings from Social Science. New America Foundation.
[139]
Nyhan, B. and Reifler, J. The Effect of Fact-Checking on Elites: A Field Experiment on U.S. State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science. 59, 3, 628–640. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12162.
[140]
‘Older “left-behind” voters turned against a political class with values opposed to theirs’ - The Guardian: 25AD. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/25/left-behind-eu-referendum-vote-ukip-revolt-brexit.
[141]
Ontario Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform 2007. On Ballot, Two Votes: A New Way to Vote in Ontario.
[142]
Oulton, C. et al. ‘Controversial issues ‐ teachers’ attitudes and practices in the context of citizenship education’. Oxford Review of Education. 30, 4, 489–507. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498042000303973.
[143]
‘Paris Climate Change Agreement Set to Take Effect After Quick Ratification Process’, TIME Magazine: http://time.com/4519895/paris-agreement-ratification-european-union/.
[144]
‘Paris climate change agreement: the world’s greatest diplomatic success’ - The Guardian, 14 December 2015: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/13/paris-climate-deal-cop-diplomacy-developing-united-nations.
[145]
Parkinson, J. ‘Legitimacy Problems in Deliberative Democracy’. Political Studies. 51, 1, 180–196. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00419.
[146]
Parkinson, J. and Mansbridge, J. eds. 2012. Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge University Press.
[147]
Paxton, P. et al. Growth in women’s political representation: A longitudinal exploration of democracy, electoral system and gender quotas. European Journal of Political Research. 49, 1, 25–52. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01886.x.
[148]
Paxton, P. and Kunovich, S. ‘Women’s Political Representation: The Importance of Ideology’. Social Forces. 82, 1, 87–113. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2003.0105.
[149]
Persson, T. et al. Electoral Rules and Corruption. Journal of the European Economic Association. 1, 4, 958–989. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493203.
[150]
Pete Dorey The Blunders of Our Governments. West European Politics. 38, 1, 252–254. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.962827.
[151]
Pilon, D. "Investigating Media as a Deliberative Space: Newspaper Opinions about Voting Systems in the 2007 Ontario Provincial Referendum”. Canadian Political Science Review. 3, 3.
[152]
PolitiFact: http://www.politifact.com/.
[153]
Pomares, J. and Guzmán, N. 2015. ‘The hardest check - Measuring the impact of fact-checking’. Chequeado.
[154]
‘Post-truth politics: Art of the lie’ - The Economist: 10AD. http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21706525-politicians-have-always-lied-does-it-matter-if-they-leave-truth-behind-entirely-art.
[155]
‘Post-truth politics? Don’t be so patronising’ - The Spectator: 12AD. http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/11/post-truth-politics-dont-be-so-patronising/.
[156]
Powell, G.B. ‘The Ideological Congruence Controversy: The Impact of Alternative Measures, Data, and Time Periods on the Effects of Election Rules’. Comparative Political Studies. 42, 12, 1475–1497. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009332147.
[157]
Rainbow Murray ‘Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All’. The American Political Science Review. 108, 3, 520–532.
[158]
Renwick, A. 2011. A citizen’s guide to electoral reform. Biteback.
[159]
Renwick, A. After the Referendum: Options for a Constitutional Convention. Constitution Society.
[160]
Renwick, A. Written evidence to the PACAC inquiry into ’Lessons Learned from the EU Referendum.
[161]
Renwick, A. and Lamb, M. "The Quality of Referendum Debate: The UK’s Electoral System Referendum in the Print Media”. Electoral Studies. 32, 2, 294–304. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.10.013.
[162]
Ronald F. Inglehart and Pippa Norris ‘Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash’, Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper Series.
[163]
Rose, L.E. ‘Municipal Size and Local Nonelectoral Participation: Findings from Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway’. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 20, 6, 829–851.
[164]
Sarah Childs and Joni Lovenduski 2013. Political Representation. The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. Oxford University Press. 489–515.
[165]
Scarrow, S.E. 2007. Political Activism and Party Members. The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford University Press.
[166]
Schuck, A.R.T. et al. ‘Cynics All Around? The Impact of Election News on Political Cynicism in Comparative Perspective’. Journal of Communication. 63, 2, 287–311. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12023.
[167]
Schwindt-Bayer, L.A. Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws On the Election of Women. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 34, 1, 5–28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3162/036298009787500330.
[168]
Schwindt-Bayer, L.A. and Mishler, W. ‘An Integrated Model of Women’s Representation’. The Journal of Politics. 67, 2, 407–428. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00323.x.
[169]
Shehata, A. ‘Game Frames, Issue Frames, and Mobilization: Disentangling the Effects of Frame Exposure and Motivated News Attention on Political Cynicism and Engagement’. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 26, 2, 157–177. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edt034.
[170]
Slacktivism, clicktivism, and ‘real’ social change - OUPblog: 19AD. http://blog.oup.com/2014/11/slacktivism-clicktivism-real-social-change/.
[171]
Smith, G. 2009. Democratic Innovations. Cambridge University Press.
[172]
Smith, G. and Wales, C. ‘Citizens’ Juries and Deliberative Democracy’. Political Studies. 48, 1, 51–65. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00250.
[173]
Strömbäck, J. and Dimitrova, D.V. ‘Political and Media Systems Matter: A Comparison of Election News Coverage in Sweden and the United States’. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 11, 4, 131–147. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X06293549.
[174]
Susan Franceschet et al. eds. 2012. The Impact of Gender Quotas. Oxford University Press.
[175]
‘The death of working-class politics: How the wealthy conquered Congress and abandoned blue-collar America’ - Salon.com: 22AD. http://www.salon.com/2014/11/22/the_death_of_working_class_politics_how_the_wealthy_conquered_congress_and_abandoned_blue_collar_america/.
[176]
‘The Great White Hype: No One Is Energizing the White Working Class, Not Even Donald Trump’ - The Intercept: 10AD. https://theintercept.com/2016/08/10/the-great-white-hype-no-one-is-energizing-the-white-working-class-not-even-donald-trump/.
[177]
The History of Direct Democracy in Switzerland: http://www.athene.antenna.nl/MEDIATHEEK/KOBACH-1.html.
[178]
‘The tyranny of the short-term: why democracy struggles with issues like climate change’ - Democratic Audit UK: 9AD. http://www.democraticaudit.com/2015/02/09/the-tyranny-of-the-short-term-why-democracy-struggles-with-issues-like-climate-change/.
[179]
‘The way we use language in politics matters’ - The Guardian: 24AD. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/apr/24/boris-johnson-eu-referendum-barack-obama-slur.
[180]
‘There’s much less gender bias in politics than you think. Here’s why’ - The Washington Post (The Monkey Cage): 24AD. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/05/24/how-much-does-gender-bias-affect-u-s-elections/.
[181]
Thomassen, J. ‘The Blind Corner of Political Representation’. Representation. 48, 1, 13–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2012.653229.
[182]
Thorson, E. Belief Echoes: The Persistent Effects of Corrected Misinformation. Political Communication. 33, 3, 460–480. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1102187.
[183]
Tobin, P. ‘The Politics of Climate Change: Can a Deal be Done?’ Political Insight. 6, 1.
[184]
Tonge, J. et al. ‘Does Citizenship Education Make Young People Better-Engaged Citizens?’ Political Studies. 60, 3, 578–602. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00931.x.
[185]
Treisman, D. ‘Decentralization and the Quality of Government’ - UCLA Working Paper, 2002.
[186]
Tristan McCowan 2011. Rethinking Citizenship Education: A Curriculum for Participatory Democracy. Continuum.
[187]
Van Aelst, P. and Walgrave, S. ‘Minimal or Massive? The Political Agenda-Setting Power of the Mass Media According to Different Methods’. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 16, 3, 295–313. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211406727.
[188]
Vowles, J. ‘Campaign Claims, Partisan Cues, and Media Effects in the 2011 British Electoral System Referendum’. Electoral Studies. 32, 2, 253–264. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.10.009.
[189]
Vowles, Jack, Banducci, Susan A., and Karp, Jeffrey A ‘Forecasting and Evaluating the Consequences of Electoral Change in New Zealand’. Acta Politica. 41, 3, 267–284.
[190]
de Vreese, C.H. and Elenbaas, M. ‘Media in the Game of Politics: Effects of Strategic Metacoverage on Political Cynicism’. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 13, 3, 285–309. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319650.
[191]
Walgrave, S. et al. ‘The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power: A Longitudinal Analysis of Media, Parliament, and Government in Belgium (1993 to 2000)’. Comparative Political Studies. 41, 6, 814–836. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006299098.
[192]
Warren, M.E. and Pearse, H. eds. 2008. Designing Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
[193]
‘Was COP21 a failure or a success?’ - Steps Centre.: 18AD. http://steps-centre.org/2015/blog/was-cop21-a-failure-or-a-success/.
[194]
‘We need renewed political commitment to citizenship education and ongoing monitoring of its provision in schools’: Democratic Audit UK blog: 19AD. http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=6065.
[195]
Weiss, L. ‘Globalization and State Power’. Development and Society. 29, 1, 1–15.
[196]
Whiteley, P.F. ‘Is the party over? The decline of party activism and membership across the democratic world’. Party Politics. 17, 1, 21–44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810365505.
[197]
William D. Nordhaus 1975. ‘The Political Business Cycle’. The Review of Economic Studies. 42, 2 (1975), 169–190.
[198]
Williams, B.A. 2010. ‘Is Democracy Threatened by the Unchecked Nature of Information on the Internet?’, Miller Center of Public Affairs paper.
[199]
Wolfgang Merkel Is There a Crisis of Democracy? Democratic Theory. 1, 2, 11–25.
[200]
Yuval Noah Harari Talking Politics. acast.
[201]
Zetterberg, P. ‘Do Gender Quotas Foster Women’s Political Engagement?: Lessons from Latin America’. Political Research Quarterly. 62, 4, 715–730. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908322411.
[202]
National Curriculum (England): Citizenship - key stages 3 and 4.
[203]
Report of the Independent Commission on the Voting System (the Jenkins Commission).
