1.
Wagenaar, H. ‘Is democracy in crisis? No, there’s just a new type of emerging democracy’, openDemocracy blog. https://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/hendrik-wagenaar/is-democracy-in-crisis-no-there%E2%80%99s-just-new-type-of-emerging-democracy (20AD).
2.
Wolfgang Merkel. Is There a Crisis of Democracy? Democratic Theory 1, 11–25.
3.
Benjamin R. Barber. Can Democracy Survive Globalization? Government and Opposition 35, 275–301.
4.
Roos, J. ‘Beyond the Vote, The Crisis of Representative Democracy’, ROAR Magazine. https://roarmag.org/essays/beyond-the-vote-the-crisis-of-representative-democracy/ (14AD).
5.
Williams, B. A. ‘Is Democracy Threatened by the Unchecked Nature of Information on the Internet?’, Miller Center of Public Affairs paper. (2010).
6.
Crozier, M. J., Huntington, S. P. & Watanuki, J. ‘The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission’. (1975).
7.
Lijphart, A. ‘Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma’. American Political Science Review 91, 1–14.
8.
Norris, P. Conclusions: The Reinvention of Political Activism? in Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism 215–224 (Cambridge University Press, 2002). doi:10.1017/CBO9780511610073.015.
9.
Blais, A. & Rubenson, D. ‘The Source of Turnout Decline: New Values or New Contexts?’ Comparative Political Studies 46, 95–117.
10.
Gray, M. & Caul, M. ‘Declining Voter Turnout in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1950 to 1997’: The Effects of Declining Group Mobilization. Comparative Political Studies 33, 1091–1122.
11.
Lutz, G. & Marsh, M. ‘Introduction: Consequences of low turnout’. Electoral Studies 26, 539–547.
12.
Mueller, D. C. & Stratmann, T. ‘The economic effects of democratic participation’. Journal of Public Economics 87, 2129–2155.
13.
van Biezen, I., Mair, P. & Poguntke, T. ‘Going, going, ... gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe’. European Journal of Political Research 51, 24–56.
14.
Whiteley, P. F. ‘Is the party over? The decline of party activism and membership across the democratic world’. Party Politics 17, 21–44.
15.
Scarrow, S. E. Political Activism and Party Members. in The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (Oxford University Press, 2007). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0034.
16.
van Biezen, I. ‘Political Parties as Public Utilities’. Party Politics 10, 701–722.
17.
Knut Heidar. Party Membership and Participation. in Handbook of Party Politics 301–315 (Sage, 2006).
18.
Dalton, R. J. ‘Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation’. Political Studies 56, 76–98.
19.
Hibbing, J. R. & Theiss-Morse, E. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work. vol. Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology (Cambridge University Press, 2002).
20.
Norris, P. Democratic Hopes and Fears. in Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited 3–18 (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
21.
White, M. Clicktivism is ruining leftist activism. https://www.micahmwhite.com/clicktivism-seminal-essay/ (2010).
22.
Franklin, M. I. Slacktivism, clicktivism, and ‘real’ social change - OUPblog. http://blog.oup.com/2014/11/slacktivism-clicktivism-real-social-change/ (19AD).
23.
Halupka, M. Clicktivism: A Systematic Heuristic. Policy & Internet 6, 115–132.
24.
Loader, B. D., Vromen, A. & Xenos, M. A. The networked young citizen: social media, political participation and civic engagement. Information, Communication & Society 17, 143–150.
25.
Gibson, R. & Cantijoch, M. ‘Conceptualizing and Measuring Participation in the Age of the Internet: Is Online Political Engagement Really Different to Offline?’ The Journal of Politics 75, 701–716.
26.
Karpf, D. ‘Online Political Mobilization from the Advocacy Group’s Perspective: Looking Beyond Clicktivism’. Policy & Internet 2, 7–41.
27.
Schwindt-Bayer, L. A. & Mishler, W. ‘An Integrated Model of Women’s Representation’. The Journal of Politics 67, 407–428.
28.
Ronald F. Inglehart & Pippa Norris. ‘Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash’, Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper Series.
29.
Sarah Childs & Joni Lovenduski. Political Representation. in The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics 489–515 (Oxford University Press, 2013). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199751457.013.0019.
30.
Paxton, P. & Kunovich, S. ‘Women’s Political Representation: The Importance of Ideology’. Social Forces 82, 87–113.
31.
Banducci, S. A., Donovan, T. & Karp, J. A. ‘Minority Representation, Empowerment, and Participation’. The Journal of Politics 66, 534–556.
32.
Gay, C. The Effect of Black Congressional Representation on Political Participation. American Political Science Review 95, 589–602.
33.
Carnes, N. ‘Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter?’ Legislative Studies Quarterly 37, 5–34.
34.
Heath, O. ‘Has the rise of middle class politicians led to the decline of class voting in Britain?’ - British Politics and Policy at LSE blog. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/the-rise-of-middle-class-politicians-and-the-decline-of-class-voting-in-britain/ (12AD).
35.
McElwee, S. ‘The death of working-class politics: How the wealthy conquered Congress and abandoned blue-collar America’ - Salon.com. http://www.salon.com/2014/11/22/the_death_of_working_class_politics_how_the_wealthy_conquered_congress_and_abandoned_blue_collar_america/ (22AD).
36.
Norris, P. ‘It’s not just Trump: Authoritarian populism is rising across the West: Here’s why’ - The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/03/11/its-not-just-trump-authoritarian-populism-is-rising-across-the-west-heres-why/ (11AD).
37.
Jilani, Z. ‘The Great White Hype: No One Is Energizing the White Working Class, Not Even Donald Trump’ - The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2016/08/10/the-great-white-hype-no-one-is-energizing-the-white-working-class-not-even-donald-trump/ (10AD).
38.
Holland, J. ‘Everyone Gets It Wrong About Donald Trump and White Voters’ - Rolling Stone. http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/everyone-gets-it-wrong-about-donald-trump-and-white-voters-w437410 (1AD).
39.
Vance, J. D. ‘How Donald Trump seduced America’s white working class’ - The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/10/jd-vance-hillbilly-elegy-donald-trump-us-white-poor-working-class (11AD).
40.
Ford, R. ‘Older “left-behind” voters turned against a political class with values opposed to theirs’ - The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/25/left-behind-eu-referendum-vote-ukip-revolt-brexit (25AD).
41.
O’Neill, B. ‘Brexit voters are not thick, not racist: just poor’ - The Spectator. http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/07/brexit-voters-are-not-thick-not-racist-just-poor/ (2AD).
42.
Mitchell, D. S. ‘Angry remain voter? Now you know how working-class people feel’ - The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/07/angry-remain-voter-working-class-division-britain (7AD).
43.
Clarke, H. D., Goodwin, M. & Whiteley, P. ‘Why Britain Voted for Brexit: An Individual-Level Analysis of hte 2016 Referendum Vote’ - paper presented at the EPOP Conference.
44.
Brandenburg, H. & Johns, R. ‘The Declining Representativeness of the British Party System, and Why It Matters’. Political Studies 62, 704–725.
45.
Thomassen, J. ‘The Blind Corner of Political Representation’. Representation 48, 13–27.
46.
Powell, G. B. ‘The Ideological Congruence Controversy: The Impact of Alternative Measures, Data, and Time Periods on the Effects of Election Rules’. Comparative Political Studies 42, 1475–1497.
47.
Golder, M. & Lloyd, G. ‘Re-evaluating the relationship between electoral rules and ideological congruence’. European Journal of Political Research 53, 200–212.
48.
Blais, A. & Bodet, M. A. ‘Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence Between Citizens and Policy Makers?’ Comparative Political Studies 39, 1243–1262.
49.
Thompson, M. ‘From Trump to Brexit rhetoric: how today’s politicians have got away with words’ - The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/aug/27/from-trump-to-brexit-rhetoric-how-todays-politicians-have-got-away-with-words (27AD).
50.
Joseph N. Cappella and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. ‘News Frames, Political Cynicism, and Media Cynicism’. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546, 71–84.
51.
Van Aelst, P. & Walgrave, S. ‘Minimal or Massive? The Political Agenda-Setting Power of the Mass Media According to Different Methods’. The International Journal of Press/Politics 16, 295–313.
52.
Green, J. ‘Former BBC head Mark Thompson on Trump, Orwell and what’s gone wrong with political language’, Daily Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/books/what-to-read/former-bbc-head-mark-thompson-on-trump-orwell-and-whats-gone-wro/ (26AD).
53.
Bland, A. ‘How did the language of politics get so toxic?’, The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/31/how-did-the-language-of-politics-get-so-toxic (31AD).
54.
Hutton, W. ‘The way we use language in politics matters’ - The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/apr/24/boris-johnson-eu-referendum-barack-obama-slur (24AD).
55.
EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. (CSJCC (Bournmouth University), CRCC (Loughborough University), and Political Studies Association).
56.
Beckett, C. ‘Don’t blame “the media” for the state of the referendum campaign’ - LSE blog. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2016/06/23/dont-blame-the-media-for-the-state-of-the-referendum-campaign/ (23AD).
57.
Schuck, A. R. T., Boomgaarden, H. G. & de Vreese, C. H. ‘Cynics All Around? The Impact of Election News on Political Cynicism in Comparative Perspective’. Journal of Communication 63, 287–311.
58.
de Vreese, C. H. & Elenbaas, M. ‘Media in the Game of Politics: Effects of Strategic Metacoverage on Political Cynicism’. The International Journal of Press/Politics 13, 285–309.
59.
Strömbäck, J. & Dimitrova, D. V. ‘Political and Media Systems Matter: A Comparison of Election News Coverage in Sweden and the United States’. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 11, 131–147.
60.
Norris, P. Negative News. in Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited 169–187 (Cambridge University Press, 2011). doi:10.1017/CBO9780511973383.010.
61.
Shehata, A. ‘Game Frames, Issue Frames, and Mobilization: Disentangling the Effects of Frame Exposure and Motivated News Attention on Political Cynicism and Engagement’. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26, 157–177.
62.
Curran, J., Iyengar, S., Brink Lund, A. & Salovaara-Moring, I. ‘Media System, Public Knowledge and Democracy: A Comparative Study’. European Journal of Communication 24, 5–26.
63.
Green-Pedersen, C. & Stubager, R. ‘The Political Conditionality of Mass Media Influence: When Do Parties Follow Mass Media Attention?’ British Journal of Political Science 40, 663–677.
64.
Walgrave, S., Soroka, S. & Nuytemans, M. ‘The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power: A Longitudinal Analysis of Media, Parliament, and Government in Belgium (1993 to 2000)’. Comparative Political Studies 41, 814–836.
65.
McKnight, D. ‘Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation: A Media Institution with A Mission’. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television 30, 303–316.
66.
Caul Kittilson, M. & Fridkin, K. ‘Gender, Candidate Portrayals and Election Campaigns: A Comparative Perspective’. Politics & Gender vol. 4 371–392 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-gender/article/gender-candidate-portrayals-and-election-campaigns-a-comparative-perspective/8A5043A6EFB2D46A138874AB77793C22.
67.
Hayes, D. & Lawless, J. L. ‘There’s much less gender bias in politics than you think. Here’s why’ - The Washington Post (The Monkey Cage). https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/05/24/how-much-does-gender-bias-affect-u-s-elections/ (24AD).
68.
Harmer, E. ‘Men Writing about Men: Media and the UK General Election 2015’, Loughborough University Communication Research Centre. http://blog.lboro.ac.uk/crcc/general-election/men-writing-about-men-media-and-the-uk-general-election-2015/ (22AD).
69.
Randers, J. ‘The tyranny of the short-term: why democracy struggles with issues like climate change’ - Democratic Audit UK. http://www.democraticaudit.com/2015/02/09/the-tyranny-of-the-short-term-why-democracy-struggles-with-issues-like-climate-change/ (9AD).
70.
Graham Smith. ‘(Not) Dealing with Climate Change: Democracy, Institutional Design, and the Long-Term’ - paper prepared for the Political Studies Association Annual Conference, 2014. 1–26 (2014).
71.
Charles A. Kupchan. ‘The Democratic Malaise: Globalization and the Threat to the West’. Foreign Affairs 91, 62–67.
72.
Gerry Stoker. ‘The Myth of Democratic Myopia’ - paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Glasgow, September 2014. 1–21.
73.
Andrew Healy and Neil Malhotra. ‘Myopic Voters and Natural Disaster Policy’. The American Political Science Review 103, 387–406.
74.
William D. Nordhaus. ‘The Political Business Cycle’. The Review of Economic Studies 42, 169–190 (1975).
75.
Drazen, A. ‘The Political Business Cycle After 25 Years’. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 15,.
76.
Franzese, R. J. ‘Electoral and Partisan Cycles and Economic Policies and Outcomes’. Annual Review of Political Science 5, 369–421 (2002).
77.
Matthew Flinders. ‘The Blunders of Our Governments, by Anthony King and Ivor Crewe - book review’. Governance 27, 357–361.
78.
Pete Dorey. The Blunders of Our Governments. West European Politics 38, 252–254.
79.
Harmer, C. ‘Book Review: Called to Account: How Corporate Bad Behaviour and Government Waste Combine to Cost Us Millions, by Margaret Hodge’ - LSE Review of Books. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2016/09/16/book-review-called-to-account-how-corporate-bad-behaviour-and-government-waste-combine-to-cost-us-millions-by-margaret-hodge/ (16AD).
80.
Tobin, P. ‘The Politics of Climate Change: Can a Deal be Done?’ Political Insight 6,.
81.
Harvey, F. ‘Paris climate change agreement: the world’s greatest diplomatic success’ - The Guardian, 14 December 2015. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/13/paris-climate-deal-cop-diplomacy-developing-united-nations.
82.
Sandra Pointel. ‘Was COP21 a failure or a success?’ - Steps Centre. http://steps-centre.org/2015/blog/was-cop21-a-failure-or-a-success/ (18AD).
83.
Jan Erik Hall. ‘Paris Agreement on Climate Change: A Diplomatic Triumph – How Can It Succeed?’ New Global Studies 10, 175–181.
84.
Justin Worland. ‘Paris Climate Change Agreement Set to Take Effect After Quick Ratification Process’, TIME Magazine. http://time.com/4519895/paris-agreement-ratification-european-union/.
85.
Cerny, P. G. ‘Globalization and the erosion of democracy’. European Journal of Political Research 36, 1–26.
86.
Weiss, L. ‘Globalization and State Power’. Development and Society 29, 1–15.
87.
Goodhart, M. ‘Democracy, Globalization, and the Problem of the State’. Polity 33,.
88.
Hay, C. & Rosamond, B. ‘Globalization, European integration and the discursive construction of economic imperatives’. Journal of European Public Policy 9, 147–167.
89.
Hay, C. ‘What’s Globalization Got to Do with It? Economic Interdependence and the Future of European Welfare States’. Government and Opposition 41, 1–22.
90.
Crepaz, M. M. L. ‘Veto Players, Globalization and the Redistributive Capacity of the State: A Panel Study of 15 OECD Countries’. Journal of Public Policy 21, 1–22.
91.
Yuval Noah Harari. Talking Politics.
92.
Bowler, S. & Donovan, T. The Limits of Electoral Reform. (Oxford University Press, 2013).
93.
The Impact of Gender Quotas. (Oxford University Press, 2012).
94.
Arend Lijphart. Electoral Systems: Majority and Plurality Methods Versus Proportional Representation. in Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries 130–157 (Yale University Press, 2012).
95.
Farrell, D. M. Electoral systems: a comparative introduction. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).
96.
Lijphart, A. Electoral Systems and Party Systems. (Oxford University Press, 1994).
97.
Renwick, A. A citizen’s guide to electoral reform. (Biteback, 2011).
98.
Garland, J. & Terry, C. The 2017 General Election: Volatile voting, random results.
99.
Jonathan Boston. Electoral reform in New Zealand: The report of the Royal Commission. Electoral Studies 6, 105–114 (1987).
100.
Report of the Independent Commission on the Voting System (the Jenkins Commission).
101.
British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform. Making Every Vote Count: The Case for Electoral Reform in British Columbia. (2004).
102.
Ontario Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform. On Ballot, Two Votes: A New Way to Vote in Ontario. (2007).
103.
Gambetta, D. & Warner, S. ‘The rhetoric of reform revealed (or: If you bite the ballot it may bite back)’. Journal of Modern Italian Studies 1, 357–376.
104.
Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky. ‘Send the rascals packing: Defects of proportional representation and the virtues of the Westminster model’. Representation 36, 117–126.
105.
Katz, Richard S. ‘Electoral Reform in Italy: Expectations and Results’. Acta Politica 41, 285–299.
106.
Vowles, Jack, Banducci, Susan A., and Karp, Jeffrey A. ‘Forecasting and Evaluating the Consequences of Electoral Change in New Zealand’. Acta Politica 41, 267–284.
107.
Norris, Pippa. ‘The Impact of Electoral Reform on Women’s Representation’. Acta Politica, suppl. Special issue: the dutch electoral system on trial 41, 197–213.
108.
Birch, S. ‘Electoral Systems and Electoral Misconduct’. Comparative Political Studies 40, 1533–1556.
109.
Persson, T., Tabellini, G. & Trebbi, F. Electoral Rules and Corruption. Journal of the European Economic Association 1, 958–989.
110.
Berinsky, A. J. The Perverse Consequences of Electoral Reform in the United States. American Politics Research 33, 471–491.
111.
Burden, B. C., Canon, D. T., Mayer, K. R. & Moynihan, D. P. ‘Election Laws, Mobilization, and Turnout: The Unanticipated Consequences of Election Reform’. American Journal of Political Science 58, 95–109.
112.
Paxton, P., Hughes, M. M. & Painter, M. A. Growth in women’s political representation: A longitudinal exploration of democracy, electoral system and gender quotas. European Journal of Political Research 49, 25–52.
113.
Dahlerup, D. ‘Electoral Gender Quotas: Between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result’. Representation 43, 73–92.
114.
Schwindt-Bayer, L. A. Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws On the Election of Women. Legislative Studies Quarterly 34, 5–28.
115.
De Paola, M., Scoppa, V. & Lombardo, R. ‘Can gender quotas break down negative stereotypes? Evidence from changes in electoral rules’. Journal of Public Economics 94, 344–353.
116.
Zetterberg, P. ‘Do Gender Quotas Foster Women’s Political Engagement?: Lessons from Latin America’. Political Research Quarterly 62, 715–730.
117.
Rainbow Murray. ‘Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All’. The American Political Science Review 108, 520–532.
118.
Baltrunaite, A., Bello, P., Casarico, A. & Profeta, P. ‘Gender quotas and the quality of politicians’. Journal of Public Economics 118, 62–74.
119.
Lewis, P. G. ‘Size and Local Democracy: Scale Effects in City Politics’. PS: Political Science and Politics 44, 107–109.
120.
Newton, K. Is Small Really So Beautiful? Is Big Really So Ugly? Size, Effectiveness, and Democracy in Local Government. Political Studies 30, 190–206.
121.
Global Democracy. (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
122.
Dahl, R. A. & Tufte, E. R. Size and democracy. vol. The politics of the smaller European democracies (Stanford University Press, 1974).
123.
Lowndes, V. & Sullivan, H. How Low Can You Go?  Rationales and Challenges for Neighbourhood Governance. Public Administration 86, 53–74.
124.
Rose, L. E. ‘Municipal Size and Local Nonelectoral Participation: Findings from Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway’. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20, 829–851.
125.
Hansen, S. W. ‘Polity Size and Local Political Trust: A Quasi-experiment Using Municipal Mergers in Denmark’. Scandinavian Political Studies 36, 43–66.
126.
Blom-Hansen, J., Houlberg, K. & Serritzlew, S. ‘Size, Democracy, and the Economic Costs of Running the Political System’. American Journal of Political Science 58, 790–803.
127.
Fjeldstad, O.-H. ‘Decentralisation and corruption. A review of the literature’ - CMI Working Paper, 2004. in (Chr. Michelsen Institute, 2004).
128.
Bardhan, P. & Mukherjee, D. ‘Decentralization, Corruption, and Government Accountability’. in International handbook on the economics of corruption vol. Elgar original reference 161–188 (Edward Elgar, 2006).
129.
Treisman, D. ‘Decentralization and the Quality of Government’ - UCLA Working Paper, 2002.
130.
Fisman, R. & Gatti, R. ‘Decentralization and corruption: evidence across countries’. Journal of Public Economics 83, 325–345.
131.
Andrews, R. & Boyne, G. A. Size, Structure and Administrative Overheads: An Empirical Analysis of English Local Authorities. Urban Studies 46, 739–759.
132.
Koenig-Archibugi, M. ‘Is global democracy possible?’ European Journal of International Relations 17, 519–542 (2011).
133.
Barber, B. R. ‘Can Democracy Survive Globalization?’ Government and Opposition 35, 275–301.
134.
Dahl, R. A. ‘Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic’s view’ (1999). in Democracy’s Edges (eds. Shapiro, I. & Hacker-Cordon, C.) 19–36 (Cambridge University Press, 1999).
135.
Iris Marion Young. ‘Self-Determination and Global Democracy: A Critique of Liberal Nationalism’. Nomos 42, 147–183 (2000).
136.
Miller, D. ‘Democracy’s Domain’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 37, 201–228.
137.
Miller, D. ‘Against Global Democracy’. in After the nation?: critical reflections on nationalism and post-nationalism vol. International political theory series 141–160 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).
138.
Goodhart, M. Civil society and the problem of global democracy. Democratization 12, 1–21.
139.
Geboers, E., Geijsel, F., Admiraal, W. & Dam, G. ten. ‘Review of the effects of citizenship education’. Educational Research Review 9, 158–173.
140.
Pomares, J. & Guzmán, N. ‘The hardest check - Measuring the impact of fact-checking’. (2015).
141.
Kymlicka, W. ‘Education for Citizenship’. in Politics in the Vernacular 293–316 (Oxford University Press, 2001).
142.
Crick, B. ‘The Presuppositions of Citizenship Education’. Journal of the Philosophy of Education 33, 337–352.
143.
Mclaughlin, T. H. ‘Citizenship Education in England: The Crick Report and Beyond’. Journal of the Philosophy of Education 34, 541–570.
144.
Johnson, L. & Morris, P. ‘Towards a framework for critical citizenship education’. The Curriculum Journal 21, 77–96.
145.
Tristan McCowan. Rethinking Citizenship Education: A Curriculum for Participatory Democracy. (Continuum, 2011).
146.
Heater, D. ‘The History of Citizenship Education: A Comparative Outline’. Parliamentary Affairs 55, 457–474.
147.
Hahn, C. L. ‘Citizenship Education: An empirical study of policy, practices and outcomes’. Oxford Review of Education 25, 231–250.
148.
Tonge, J., Mycock, A. & Jeffery, B. ‘Does Citizenship Education Make Young People Better-Engaged Citizens?’ Political Studies 60, 578–602.
149.
Advisory Group on Citizenship. Crick Report: Education for Citizenship and the Teaching of Democracy in Schools. (22AD).
150.
National Curriculum (England): Citizenship - key stages 3 and 4.
151.
Keating, A., Kerr, D., Benton, T., Mundy, E. & Lopes, J. Citizenship Education in England 2001-2010: Young People’s Practices and Prospects for the Future: The Eighth and Final Report from the Citizenship Education Longitudinal Study (CELS).
152.
Kerr, D. ‘We need renewed political commitment to citizenship education and ongoing monitoring of its provision in schools’: Democratic Audit UK blog. http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=6065 (19AD).
153.
Oulton, C., Day, V., Dillon, J. & Grace, M. ‘Controversial issues ‐ teachers’ attitudes and practices in the context of citizenship education’. Oxford Review of Education 30, 489–507.
154.
Faulks, K. ‘Education for citizenship in England’s secondary schools: a critique of current principle and practice’. Journal of Education Policy 21, 59–74.
155.
Frazer, E. ‘Citizenship Education: Anti-Political Culture and Political Education in Britain’. Political Studies 48, 88–103.
156.
Thorson, E. Belief Echoes: The Persistent Effects of Corrected Misinformation. Political Communication 33, 460–480.
157.
Nyhan, B. & Reifler, J. The Effect of Fact-Checking on Elites: A Field Experiment on U.S. State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science 59, 628–640.
158.
Gottfried, J. A., Hardy, B. W., Winneg, K. M. & Jamieson, K. H. Did Fact Checking Matter in the 2012 Presidential Campaign? American Behavioral Scientist 57, 1558–1567.
159.
Nyhan, B. & Reifler, J. Misinformation and Fact-checking: Research Findings from Social Science.
160.
Goss, Z. & Renwick, A. ‘Fact-checking and the EU referendum’ - Constitution Unit Blog. https://constitution-unit.com/2016/08/23/fact-checking-and-the-eu-referendum/ (23AD).
161.
Mantzarlis, A. ‘Fact-checking matters - here are 6 metrics to help prove it’, Poynter. http://www.poynter.org/2016/fact-checking-matters-here-are-6-metrics-to-help-prove-it/400582/ (30AD).
162.
Fields, L. ‘How the “post-truth” election has put a strain on America’s fact-checkers’ - Vice News. https://news.vice.com/story/how-the-post-truth-election-has-put-a-strain-on-americas-fact-checkers (19AD).
163.
Fox, C. ‘Post-truth politics? Don’t be so patronising’ - The Spectator. http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/11/post-truth-politics-dont-be-so-patronising/ (12AD).
164.
‘Post-truth politics: Art of the lie’ - The Economist. http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21706525-politicians-have-always-lied-does-it-matter-if-they-leave-truth-behind-entirely-art (10AD).
165.
PolitiFact. http://www.politifact.com/.
166.
FactCheck. http://www.factcheck.org/.
167.
Full Fact. https://fullfact.org/.
168.
LeDuc, L. The politics of direct democracy: referendums in global perspective. (Broadview Press, 2003).
169.
Renwick, A. Written evidence to the PACAC inquiry into ’Lessons Learned from the EU Referendum.
170.
Lupia, Arthur. ‘Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections’. The American Political Science Review 88,.
171.
Renwick, A. & Lamb, M. "The Quality of Referendum Debate: The UK’s Electoral System Referendum in the Print Media”. Electoral Studies 32, 294–304.
172.
Vowles, J. ‘Campaign Claims, Partisan Cues, and Media Effects in the 2011 British Electoral System Referendum’. Electoral Studies 32, 253–264.
173.
Pilon, D. "Investigating Media as a Deliberative Space:  Newspaper Opinions about Voting Systems in the 2007 Ontario Provincial Referendum”. Canadian Political Science Review 3,.
174.
LeDuc, L. ‘Referendums and deliberative democracy’. Electoral Studies 38, 139–148.
175.
John Gastil, Robert Richards, & Katherine Knobloch. ‘Vicarious Deliberation: How the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review Influenced Deliberation in Mass Elections’. International Journal of Communication 8, 62–89 (2014).
176.
EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. (CSJCC (Bournmouth University), CRCC (Loughborough University), and Political Studies Association).
177.
Loughborough University Centre for Research in Communication and Culture. ‘Media Coverage of the EU Referendum (Report 5)’ Centre for Research in Communication and Culture. http://blog.lboro.ac.uk/crcc/eu-referendum/uk-news-coverage-2016-eu-referendum-report-5-6-may-22-june-2016/ (27AD).
178.
Goss, Z. & Renwick, A. ‘Fact-checking and the EU referendum’ - The Constitution Unit Blog. https://constitution-unit.com/2016/08/23/fact-checking-and-the-eu-referendum/ (23AD).
179.
Brett, W. ‘It’s Good to Talk: Doing Referendums Differently after the EU Vote’ - Electoral Reform Society report.
180.
Kobach, K. W. The History of Direct Democracy in Switzerland. http://www.athene.antenna.nl/MEDIATHEEK/KOBACH-1.html.
181.
Lutz, G. ‘The Interaction between Direct and Representative Democracy in Switzerland’. Representation 42, 45–57.
182.
Christin, T., Hug, S. & Sciarini, P. Interests and information in referendum voting: An analysis of Swiss voters. European Journal of Political Research 41, 759–776.
183.
Feld, L. P., Fischer, J. A. V. & Kirchgässner, G. ‘The Effect of Direct Democracy on Income Redistribution: Evidence for Switzerland’. Economic Inquiry 48, 817–840.
184.
Benz, M. & Stutzer, A. ‘Are Voters Better Informed When They Have a Larger Say in Politics? – Evidence for the European Union and Switzerland’. Public Choice 119, 31–59.
185.
Elster, J. Introduction. in Deliberative Democracy (ed. Elster, J.) 1–18 (Cambridge University Press, 1998).
186.
Bruce Ackerman & James S. Fishkin. Deliberation Day. in Debating Deliberative Democracy (eds. Fishkin, J. S. & Laslett, P.) 7–30 (Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2003).
187.
Iris Marion Young. ‘Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy’. Political Theory 29, 670–690.
188.
Chantal Mouffe. ‘Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?’ Social Research 66, 745–758.
189.
Parkinson, J. ‘Legitimacy Problems in Deliberative Democracy’. Political Studies 51, 180–196.
190.
Cooke, M. Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy. Political Studies 48, 947–969.
191.
Dryzek, J. S. Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia. Political Theory 33, 218–242.
192.
Smith, G. Democratic Innovations. (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
193.
Smith, G. & Wales, C. ‘Citizens’ Juries and Deliberative Democracy’. Political Studies 48, 51–65.
194.
Designing Deliberative Democracy. (Cambridge University Press, 2008).
195.
Niemeyer, S. ‘The Emancipatory Effect of Deliberation: Empirical Lessons from Mini-Publics’. Politics & Society 39, 103–140.
196.
Caluwaerts, D., Jacquet, V. & Reuchamps, M. ‘Deliberative Democracy and the So What Question: The Effects of Belgium’s G1000’ - paper delivered at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, 2016.
197.
Renwick, A. After the Referendum: Options for a Constitutional Convention.
198.
Böker, M. ‘Justification, critique and deliberative legitimacy: The limits of mini-publics’. Contemporary Political Theory (22AD) doi:10.1057/cpt.2016.11.
199.
Lafont, C. ‘Deliberation, Participation, and Democratic Legitimacy: Should Deliberative Mini-publics Shape Public Policy?’ Journal of Political Philosophy 23, 40–63.
200.
Fung, Archon. ‘Deliberation day’ (book review). Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24, 472–476.
201.
Chad Flanders. ‘Deliberative Dilemmas: A Critique of Deliberation Day from the Perspective of Election Law’. Journal of Law & Politics 23, 147–170.
202.
David Schkade, Cass R. Sunstein and Reid Hastie. What Happened on Deliberation Day? California Law Review 95, 915–940.
203.
Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. (Cambridge University Press, 2012).