1.
Wagenaar H. ‘Is democracy in crisis? No, there’s just a new type of emerging democracy’, openDemocracy blog [Internet]. 20AD. Available from: https://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/hendrik-wagenaar/is-democracy-in-crisis-no-there%E2%80%99s-just-new-type-of-emerging-democracy
2.
Wolfgang Merkel. Is There a Crisis of Democracy? Democratic Theory [Internet]. 1(2):11–25. Available from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1768227995/FFE9551CF97D473CPQ/2?accountid=14511
3.
Benjamin R. Barber. Can Democracy Survive Globalization? Government and Opposition. 35(3):275–301.
4.
Roos J. ‘Beyond the Vote, The Crisis of Representative Democracy’, ROAR Magazine [Internet]. 14AD. Available from: https://roarmag.org/essays/beyond-the-vote-the-crisis-of-representative-democracy/
5.
Williams BA. ‘Is Democracy Threatened by the Unchecked Nature of Information on the Internet?’, Miller Center of Public Affairs paper [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://web1.millercenter.org/debates/whitepaper/deb_2010_0518_internet.pdf
6.
Crozier MJ, Huntington SP, Watanuki J. ‘The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission’ [Internet]. New York University Press; 1975. Available from: http://trilateral.org/download/doc/crisis_of_democracy.pdf
7.
Lijphart A. ‘Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma’. American Political Science Review [Internet]. 91(1):1–14. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/unequal-participation-democracys-unresolved-dilemma-presidential-address-american-political-science-association-1996/FB743AB4AEBB70C9363A9F8B898A17BC
8.
Norris P. Conclusions: The Reinvention of Political Activism? In: Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 215–24. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511610073
9.
Blais A, Rubenson D. ‘The Source of Turnout Decline: New Values or New Contexts?’ Comparative Political Studies. 46(1):95–117.
10.
Gray M, Caul M. ‘Declining Voter Turnout in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1950 to 1997’: The Effects of Declining Group Mobilization. Comparative Political Studies. 33(9):1091–122.
11.
Lutz G, Marsh M. ‘Introduction: Consequences of low turnout’. Electoral Studies. 26(3):539–47.
12.
Mueller DC, Stratmann T. ‘The economic effects of democratic participation’. Journal of Public Economics. 87(9–10):2129–55.
13.
van Biezen I, Mair P, Poguntke T. ‘Going, going, ... gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe’. European Journal of Political Research. 51(1):24–56.
14.
Whiteley PF. ‘Is the party over? The decline of party activism and membership across the democratic world’. Party Politics. 17(1):21–44.
15.
Scarrow SE. Political Activism and Party Members. In: The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2007. Available from: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199270125
16.
van Biezen I. ‘Political Parties as Public Utilities’. Party Politics. 10(6):701–22.
17.
Knut Heidar. Party Membership and Participation. In: Handbook of Party Politics [Internet]. Sage; 2006. p. 301–15. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781446206812
18.
Dalton RJ. ‘Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation’. Political Studies. 56(1):76–98.
19.
Hibbing JR, Theiss-Morse E. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work [Internet]. Vol. Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613722
20.
Norris P. Democratic Hopes and Fears. In: Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 3–18. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973383
21.
White M. Clicktivism is ruining leftist activism [Internet]. 2010. Available from: https://www.micahmwhite.com/clicktivism-seminal-essay/
22.
Franklin MI. Slacktivism, clicktivism, and ‘real’ social change - OUPblog [Internet]. 19AD. Available from: http://blog.oup.com/2014/11/slacktivism-clicktivism-real-social-change/
23.
Halupka M. Clicktivism: A Systematic Heuristic. Policy & Internet. 6(2):115–32.
24.
Loader BD, Vromen A, Xenos MA. The networked young citizen: social media, political participation and civic engagement. Information, Communication & Society. 17(2):143–50.
25.
Gibson R, Cantijoch M. ‘Conceptualizing and Measuring Participation in the Age of the Internet: Is Online Political Engagement Really Different to Offline?’ The Journal of Politics. 75(3):701–16.
26.
Karpf D. ‘Online Political Mobilization from the Advocacy Group’s Perspective: Looking Beyond Clicktivism’. Policy & Internet. 2(4):7–41.
27.
Schwindt-Bayer LA, Mishler W. ‘An Integrated Model of Women’s Representation’. The Journal of Politics. 67(2):407–28.
28.
Ronald F. Inglehart, Pippa Norris. ‘Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash’, Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper Series. Available from: https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=1401
29.
Sarah Childs, Joni Lovenduski. Political Representation. In: The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 489–515. Available from: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199751457.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199751457
30.
Paxton P, Kunovich S. ‘Women’s Political Representation: The Importance of Ideology’. Social Forces. 82(1):87–113.
31.
Banducci SA, Donovan T, Karp JA. ‘Minority Representation, Empowerment, and Participation’. The Journal of Politics. 66(2):534–56.
32.
Gay C. The Effect of Black Congressional Representation on Political Participation. American Political Science Review. 95(3):589–602.
33.
Carnes N. ‘Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter?’ Legislative Studies Quarterly. 37(1):5–34.
34.
Heath O. ‘Has the rise of middle class politicians led to the decline of class voting in Britain?’ - British Politics and Policy at LSE blog [Internet]. 12AD. Available from: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/the-rise-of-middle-class-politicians-and-the-decline-of-class-voting-in-britain/
35.
McElwee S. ‘The death of working-class politics: How the wealthy conquered Congress and abandoned blue-collar America’ - Salon.com [Internet]. 22AD. Available from: http://www.salon.com/2014/11/22/the_death_of_working_class_politics_how_the_wealthy_conquered_congress_and_abandoned_blue_collar_america/
36.
Norris P. ‘It’s not just Trump: Authoritarian populism is rising across the West: Here’s why’ - The Washington Post [Internet]. 11AD. Available from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/03/11/its-not-just-trump-authoritarian-populism-is-rising-across-the-west-heres-why/
37.
Jilani Z. ‘The Great White Hype: No One Is Energizing the White Working Class, Not Even Donald Trump’ - The Intercept [Internet]. 10AD. Available from: https://theintercept.com/2016/08/10/the-great-white-hype-no-one-is-energizing-the-white-working-class-not-even-donald-trump/
38.
Holland J. ‘Everyone Gets It Wrong About Donald Trump and White Voters’ - Rolling Stone [Internet]. 1AD. Available from: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/everyone-gets-it-wrong-about-donald-trump-and-white-voters-w437410
39.
Vance JD. ‘How Donald Trump seduced America’s white working class’ - The Guardian [Internet]. 11AD. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/10/jd-vance-hillbilly-elegy-donald-trump-us-white-poor-working-class
40.
Ford R. ‘Older “left-behind” voters turned against a political class with values opposed to theirs’ - The Guardian [Internet]. 25AD. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/25/left-behind-eu-referendum-vote-ukip-revolt-brexit
41.
O’Neill B. ‘Brexit voters are not thick, not racist: just poor’ - The Spectator [Internet]. 2AD. Available from: http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/07/brexit-voters-are-not-thick-not-racist-just-poor/
42.
Mitchell DS. ‘Angry remain voter? Now you know how working-class people feel’ - The Guardian [Internet]. 7AD. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/07/angry-remain-voter-working-class-division-britain
43.
Clarke HD, Goodwin M, Whiteley P. ‘Why Britain Voted for Brexit: An Individual-Level Analysis of hte 2016 Referendum Vote’ - paper presented at the EPOP Conference. Available from: https://blogs.kent.ac.uk/epop/files/2016/07/Clarke-Goodwin-and-Whiteley.pdf
44.
Brandenburg H, Johns R. ‘The Declining Representativeness of the British Party System, and Why It Matters’. Political Studies. 62(4):704–25.
45.
Thomassen J. ‘The Blind Corner of Political Representation’. Representation. 48(1):13–27.
46.
Powell GB. ‘The Ideological Congruence Controversy: The Impact of Alternative Measures, Data, and Time Periods on the Effects of Election Rules’. Comparative Political Studies. 42(12):1475–97.
47.
Golder M, Lloyd G. ‘Re-evaluating the relationship between electoral rules and ideological congruence’. European Journal of Political Research. 53(1):200–12.
48.
Blais A, Bodet MA. ‘Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence Between Citizens and Policy Makers?’ Comparative Political Studies. 39(10):1243–62.
49.
Thompson M. ‘From Trump to Brexit rhetoric: how today’s politicians have got away with words’ - The Guardian [Internet]. 27AD. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/aug/27/from-trump-to-brexit-rhetoric-how-todays-politicians-have-got-away-with-words
50.
Joseph N. Cappella and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. ‘News Frames, Political Cynicism, and Media Cynicism’. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science [Internet]. 546:71–84. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1048171?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
51.
Van Aelst P, Walgrave S. ‘Minimal or Massive? The Political Agenda-Setting Power of the Mass Media According to Different Methods’. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 16(3):295–313.
52.
Green J. ‘Former BBC head Mark Thompson on Trump, Orwell and what’s gone wrong with political language’, Daily Telegraph [Internet]. 26AD. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/books/what-to-read/former-bbc-head-mark-thompson-on-trump-orwell-and-whats-gone-wro/
53.
Bland A. ‘How did the language of politics get so toxic?’, The Guardian [Internet]. 31AD. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/31/how-did-the-language-of-politics-get-so-toxic
54.
Hutton W. ‘The way we use language in politics matters’ - The Guardian [Internet]. 24AD. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/apr/24/boris-johnson-eu-referendum-barack-obama-slur
55.
Johnson D, Thorsen E, Wring D, editors. EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign [Internet]. CSJCC (Bournmouth University), CRCC (Loughborough University), and Political Studies Association; Available from: http://www.referendumanalysis.eu/
56.
Beckett C. ‘Don’t blame “the media” for the state of the referendum campaign’ - LSE blog [Internet]. 23AD. Available from: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2016/06/23/dont-blame-the-media-for-the-state-of-the-referendum-campaign/
57.
Schuck ART, Boomgaarden HG, de Vreese CH. ‘Cynics All Around? The Impact of Election News on Political Cynicism in Comparative Perspective’. Journal of Communication. 63(2):287–311.
58.
de Vreese CH, Elenbaas M. ‘Media in the Game of Politics: Effects of Strategic Metacoverage on Political Cynicism’. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 13(3):285–309.
59.
Strömbäck J, Dimitrova DV. ‘Political and Media Systems Matter: A Comparison of Election News Coverage in Sweden and the United States’. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 11(4):131–47.
60.
Norris P. Negative News. In: Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 169–87. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973383
61.
Shehata A. ‘Game Frames, Issue Frames, and Mobilization: Disentangling the Effects of Frame Exposure and Motivated News Attention on Political Cynicism and Engagement’. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 26(2):157–77.
62.
Curran J, Iyengar S, Brink Lund A, Salovaara-Moring I. ‘Media System, Public Knowledge and Democracy: A Comparative Study’. European Journal of Communication. 24(1):5–26.
63.
Green-Pedersen C, Stubager R. ‘The Political Conditionality of Mass Media Influence: When Do Parties Follow Mass Media Attention?’ British Journal of Political Science [Internet]. 40(3):663–77. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science/article/the-political-conditionality-of-mass-media-influence-when-do-parties-follow-mass-media-attention/B4B6AF9C6202627C402A6847D50562C4
64.
Walgrave S, Soroka S, Nuytemans M. ‘The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power: A Longitudinal Analysis of Media, Parliament, and Government in Belgium (1993 to 2000)’. Comparative Political Studies. 41(6):814–36.
65.
McKnight D. ‘Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation: A Media Institution with A Mission’. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television. 30(3):303–16.
66.
Caul Kittilson M, Fridkin K. ‘Gender, Candidate Portrayals and Election Campaigns: A Comparative Perspective’ [Internet]. Vol. 4, Politics & Gender. p. 371–92. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-gender/article/gender-candidate-portrayals-and-election-campaigns-a-comparative-perspective/8A5043A6EFB2D46A138874AB77793C22
67.
Hayes D, Lawless JL. ‘There’s much less gender bias in politics than you think. Here’s why’ - The Washington Post (The Monkey Cage) [Internet]. 24AD. Available from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/05/24/how-much-does-gender-bias-affect-u-s-elections/
68.
Harmer E. ‘Men Writing about Men: Media and the UK General Election 2015’, Loughborough University Communication Research Centre [Internet]. 22AD. Available from: http://blog.lboro.ac.uk/crcc/general-election/men-writing-about-men-media-and-the-uk-general-election-2015/
69.
Randers J. ‘The tyranny of the short-term: why democracy struggles with issues like climate change’ - Democratic Audit UK [Internet]. 9AD. Available from: http://www.democraticaudit.com/2015/02/09/the-tyranny-of-the-short-term-why-democracy-struggles-with-issues-like-climate-change/
70.
Graham Smith. ‘(Not) Dealing with Climate Change: Democracy, Institutional Design, and the Long-Term’ - paper prepared for the Political Studies Association Annual Conference, 2014 [Internet]. 2014. p. 1–26. Available from: https://www.psa.ac.uk/sites/default/files/conference/papers/2015/Democracy%20and%20the%20long-term%20PSA%202015%20version.pdf
71.
Charles A. Kupchan. ‘The Democratic Malaise: Globalization and the Threat to the West’. Foreign Affairs [Internet]. 91(1):62–7. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23217148?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
72.
Gerry Stoker. ‘The Myth of Democratic Myopia’ - paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Glasgow, September 2014 [Internet]. p. 1–21. Available from: http://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/f4c9334a-06a1-46a1-9fc4-94129e4e78eb.pdf
73.
Andrew Healy and Neil Malhotra. ‘Myopic Voters and Natural Disaster Policy’. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 103(3):387–406. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27798512?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
74.
William D. Nordhaus. ‘The Political Business Cycle’. The Review of Economic Studies [Internet]. 1975;42(2):169–90. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2296528?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
75.
Drazen A. ‘The Political Business Cycle After 25 Years’. NBER Macroeconomics Annual [Internet]. 15. Available from: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c11055.pdf
76.
Franzese RJ. ‘Electoral and Partisan Cycles and Economic Policies and Outcomes’. Annual Review of Political Science. 2002;5:369–421.
77.
Matthew Flinders. ‘The Blunders of Our Governments, by Anthony King and Ivor Crewe - book review’. Governance [Internet]. 27(2):357–61. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bsu&AN=94891299&site=ehost-live&scope=site
78.
Pete Dorey. The Blunders of Our Governments. West European Politics. 38(1):252–4.
79.
Harmer C. ‘Book Review: Called to Account: How Corporate Bad Behaviour and Government Waste Combine to Cost Us Millions, by Margaret Hodge’ - LSE Review of Books [Internet]. 16AD. Available from: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2016/09/16/book-review-called-to-account-how-corporate-bad-behaviour-and-government-waste-combine-to-cost-us-millions-by-margaret-hodge/
80.
Tobin P. ‘The Politics of Climate Change: Can a Deal be Done?’ Political Insight [Internet]. 6(1). Available from: https://www.psa.ac.uk/insight-plus/politics-climate-change-can-deal-be-done
81.
Harvey F. ‘Paris climate change agreement: the world’s greatest diplomatic success’ - The Guardian, 14 December 2015 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/13/paris-climate-deal-cop-diplomacy-developing-united-nations
82.
Sandra Pointel. ‘Was COP21 a failure or a success?’ - Steps Centre. [Internet]. 18AD. Available from: http://steps-centre.org/2015/blog/was-cop21-a-failure-or-a-success/
83.
Jan Erik Hall. ‘Paris Agreement on Climate Change: A Diplomatic Triumph – How Can It Succeed?’ New Global Studies. 10(2):175–81.
84.
Justin Worland. ‘Paris Climate Change Agreement Set to Take Effect After Quick Ratification Process’, TIME Magazine [Internet]. Available from: http://time.com/4519895/paris-agreement-ratification-european-union/
85.
Cerny PG. ‘Globalization and the erosion of democracy’. European Journal of Political Research. 36(1):1–26.
86.
Weiss L. ‘Globalization and State Power’. Development and Society [Internet]. 29(1):1–15. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.477.696&rep=rep1&type=pdf
87.
Goodhart M. ‘Democracy, Globalization, and the Problem of the State’. Polity. 33(4).
88.
Hay C, Rosamond B. ‘Globalization, European integration and the discursive construction of economic imperatives’. Journal of European Public Policy. 9(2):147–67.
89.
Hay C. ‘What’s Globalization Got to Do with It? Economic Interdependence and the Future of European Welfare States’. Government and Opposition. 41(1):1–22.
90.
Crepaz MML. ‘Veto Players, Globalization and the Redistributive Capacity of the State: A Panel Study of 15 OECD Countries’. Journal of Public Policy. 21(1):1–22.
91.
Yuval Noah Harari. Talking Politics [Internet]. acast; Available from: https://www.acast.com/talkingpolitics/untitledepisode----------
92.
Bowler S, Donovan T. The Limits of Electoral Reform [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2013. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695409.001.0001/acprof-9780199695409
93.
Susan Franceschet, Mona Lena Krook, Jennifer M. Piscopo, editors. The Impact of Gender Quotas [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199830091.001.0001/acprof-9780199830091
94.
Arend Lijphart. Electoral Systems: Majority and Plurality Methods Versus Proportional Representation. In: Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. 2nd ed. New Haven [Conn.]: Yale University Press; 2012. p. 130–57.
95.
Farrell DM. Electoral systems: a comparative introduction [Internet]. 2nd ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011. Available from: https://read.kortext.com/reader/pdf/15909/Cover
96.
Lijphart A. Electoral Systems and Party Systems [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 1994. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198273479.001.0001/acprof-9780198273479
97.
Renwick A. A citizen’s guide to electoral reform. London: Biteback; 2011.
98.
Garland J, Terry C. The 2017 General Election: Volatile voting, random results [Internet]. Available from: https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/2017-UK-General-Election-Report.pdf
99.
Jonathan Boston. Electoral reform in New Zealand: The report of the Royal Commission. Electoral Studies. 1987 Aug;6(2):105–14.
100.
Report of the Independent Commission on the Voting System (the Jenkins Commission) [Internet]. Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140131031506/http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm40/4090/4090.htm
101.
British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform. Making Every Vote Count: The Case for Electoral Reform in British Columbia [Internet]. 2004. Available from: http://citizensassembly.arts.ubc.ca/resources/final_report.pdf
102.
Ontario Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform. On Ballot, Two Votes: A New Way to Vote in Ontario [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://www.citizensassembly.gov.on.ca/assets/One%20Ballot,%20Two%20Votes.pdf
103.
Gambetta D, Warner S. ‘The rhetoric of reform revealed (or: If you bite the ballot it may bite back)’. Journal of Modern Italian Studies. 1(3):357–76.
104.
Michael Pinto‐Duschinsky. ‘Send the rascals packing: Defects of proportional representation and the virtues of the Westminster model’. Representation [Internet]. 36(2):117–26. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00344899908523069
105.
Katz, Richard S. ‘Electoral Reform in Italy: Expectations and Results’. Acta Politica [Internet]. 41(3):285–99. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/217169675?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511
106.
Vowles, Jack, Banducci, Susan A., and Karp, Jeffrey A. ‘Forecasting and Evaluating the Consequences of Electoral Change in New Zealand’. Acta Politica [Internet]. 41(3):267–84. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/217170980?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511
107.
Norris, Pippa. ‘The Impact of Electoral Reform on Women’s Representation’. Acta Politica, suppl Special issue: the dutch electoral system on trial [Internet]. 41(2):197–213. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/217171026?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511
108.
Birch S. ‘Electoral Systems and Electoral Misconduct’. Comparative Political Studies. 40(12):1533–56.
109.
Persson T, Tabellini G, Trebbi F. Electoral Rules and Corruption. Journal of the European Economic Association. 1(4):958–89.
110.
Berinsky AJ. The Perverse Consequences of Electoral Reform in the United States. American Politics Research. 33(4):471–91.
111.
Burden BC, Canon DT, Mayer KR, Moynihan DP. ‘Election Laws, Mobilization, and Turnout: The Unanticipated Consequences of Election Reform’. American Journal of Political Science. 58(1):95–109.
112.
Paxton P, Hughes MM, Painter MA. Growth in women’s political representation: A longitudinal exploration of democracy, electoral system and gender quotas. European Journal of Political Research. 49(1):25–52.
113.
Dahlerup D. ‘Electoral Gender Quotas: Between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result’. Representation. 43(2):73–92.
114.
Schwindt-Bayer LA. Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws On the Election of Women. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 34(1):5–28.
115.
De Paola M, Scoppa V, Lombardo R. ‘Can gender quotas break down negative stereotypes? Evidence from changes in electoral rules’. Journal of Public Economics. 94(5–6):344–53.
116.
Zetterberg P. ‘Do Gender Quotas Foster Women’s Political Engagement?: Lessons from Latin America’. Political Research Quarterly. 62(4):715–30.
117.
Rainbow Murray. ‘Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All’. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 108(3):520–32. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1555236361?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511
118.
Baltrunaite A, Bello P, Casarico A, Profeta P. ‘Gender quotas and the quality of politicians’. Journal of Public Economics. 118:62–74.
119.
Lewis PG. ‘Size and Local Democracy: Scale Effects in City Politics’. PS: Political Science and Politics [Internet]. 44(1):107–9. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/size-and-local-democracy-scale-effects-in-city-politics/F36C81806396C8EBE834EDC794372CA4
120.
Newton K. Is Small Really So Beautiful? Is Big Really So Ugly? Size, Effectiveness, and Democracy in Local Government. Political Studies [Internet]. 30(2):190–206. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1982.tb00532.x
121.
Archibugi D, Koenig-Archibugi M, Marchetti R, editors. Global Democracy [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511977992
122.
Dahl RA, Tufte ER. Size and democracy. Vol. The politics of the smaller European democracies. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1974.
123.
Lowndes V, Sullivan H. How Low Can You Go? Rationales and Challenges for Neighbourhood Governance. Public Administration. 86(1):53–74.
124.
Rose LE. ‘Municipal Size and Local Nonelectoral Participation: Findings from Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway’. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy [Internet]. 20(6):829–51. Available from: https://journals-sagepub-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1068/c0227
125.
Hansen SW. ‘Polity Size and Local Political Trust: A Quasi-experiment Using Municipal Mergers in Denmark’. Scandinavian Political Studies. 36(1):43–66.
126.
Blom-Hansen J, Houlberg K, Serritzlew S. ‘Size, Democracy, and the Economic Costs of Running the Political System’. American Journal of Political Science. 58(4):790–803.
127.
Fjeldstad OH. ‘Decentralisation and corruption. A review of the literature’ - CMI Working Paper, 2004. In Chr. Michelsen Institute; 2004. Available from: http://bora.cmi.no/dspace/handle/10202/130
128.
Bardhan P, Mukherjee D. ‘Decentralization, Corruption, and Government Accountability’. In: International handbook on the economics of corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2006. p. 161–88.
129.
Treisman D. ‘Decentralization and the Quality of Government’ - UCLA Working Paper, 2002 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/treisman/Papers/DecandGovt.pdf
130.
Fisman R, Gatti R. ‘Decentralization and corruption: evidence across countries’. Journal of Public Economics. 83(3):325–45.
131.
Andrews R, Boyne GA. Size, Structure and Administrative Overheads: An Empirical Analysis of English Local Authorities. Urban Studies. 46(4):739–59.
132.
Koenig-Archibugi M. ‘Is global democracy possible?’ European Journal of International Relations. 2011 Sep 1;17(3):519–42.
133.
Barber BR. ‘Can Democracy Survive Globalization?’ Government and Opposition [Internet]. 35(3):275–301. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/government-and-opposition/article/can-democracy-survive-globalization/C5EAEC760DF8065D5B007DD5BE8F7A27
134.
Dahl RA. ‘Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic’s view’ (1999). In: Shapiro I, Hacker-Cordon C, editors. Democracy’s Edges [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 19–36. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/democracys-edges/can-international-organizations-be-democratic-a-skeptics-view/A3A2DA62DC8047BF79221B28BE0DDCFE
135.
Iris Marion Young. ‘Self-Determination and Global Democracy: A Critique of Liberal Nationalism’. Nomos [Internet]. 2000;42:147–83. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24219916?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
136.
Miller D. ‘Democracy’s Domain’. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 37(3):201–28.
137.
Miller D. ‘Against Global Democracy’. In: After the nation?: critical reflections on nationalism and post-nationalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010. p. 141–60.
138.
Goodhart M. Civil society and the problem of global democracy. Democratization. 12(1):1–21.
139.
Geboers E, Geijsel F, Admiraal W, Dam G ten. ‘Review of the effects of citizenship education’. Educational Research Review. 9:158–73.
140.
Pomares J, Guzmán N. ‘The hardest check - Measuring the impact of fact-checking’ [Internet]. Chequeado; 2015. Available from: https://www.poynter.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/The-hardest-check-1.pdf
141.
Kymlicka W. ‘Education for Citizenship’. In: Politics in the Vernacular [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2001. p. 293–316. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0199240981.001.0001/acprof-9780199240982-chapter-17
142.
Crick B. ‘The Presuppositions of Citizenship Education’. Journal of the Philosophy of Education. 33(3):337–52.
143.
Mclaughlin TH. ‘Citizenship Education in England: The Crick Report and Beyond’. Journal of the Philosophy of Education. 34(4):541–70.
144.
Johnson L, Morris P. ‘Towards a framework for critical citizenship education’. The Curriculum Journal. 21(1):77–96.
145.
Tristan McCowan. Rethinking Citizenship Education: A Curriculum for Participatory Democracy. [Internet]. Continuum; 2011. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/UCL/detail.action?docID=602012
146.
Heater D. ‘The History of Citizenship Education: A Comparative Outline’. Parliamentary Affairs [Internet]. 55(3):457–74. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/pa/article/55/3/457/1456156
147.
Hahn CL. ‘Citizenship Education: An empirical study of policy, practices and outcomes’. Oxford Review of Education. 25(1–2):231–50.
148.
Tonge J, Mycock A, Jeffery B. ‘Does Citizenship Education Make Young People Better-Engaged Citizens?’ Political Studies. 60(3):578–602.
149.
Advisory Group on Citizenship. Crick Report: Education for Citizenship and the Teaching of Democracy in Schools [Internet]. 22AD. Available from: http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/4385/1/crickreport1998.pdf
150.
National Curriculum (England): Citizenship - key stages 3 and 4 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/239060/SECONDARY_national_curriculum_-_Citizenship.pdf
151.
Keating A, Kerr D, Benton T, Mundy E, Lopes J. Citizenship Education in England 2001-2010: Young People’s Practices and Prospects for the Future: The Eighth and Final Report from the Citizenship Education Longitudinal Study (CELS) [Internet]. Department for Education; Available from: http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/11579/1/DFE-RR059.pdf
152.
Kerr D. ‘We need renewed political commitment to citizenship education and ongoing monitoring of its provision in schools’: Democratic Audit UK blog [Internet]. 19AD. Available from: http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=6065
153.
Oulton C, Day V, Dillon J, Grace M. ‘Controversial issues ‐ teachers’ attitudes and practices in the context of citizenship education’. Oxford Review of Education. 30(4):489–507.
154.
Faulks K. ‘Education for citizenship in England’s secondary schools: a critique of current principle and practice’. Journal of Education Policy. 21(1):59–74.
155.
Frazer E. ‘Citizenship Education: Anti-Political Culture and Political Education in Britain’. Political Studies. 48(1):88–103.
156.
Thorson E. Belief Echoes: The Persistent Effects of Corrected Misinformation. Political Communication. 33(3):460–80.
157.
Nyhan B, Reifler J. The Effect of Fact-Checking on Elites: A Field Experiment on U.S. State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science. 59(3):628–40.
158.
Gottfried JA, Hardy BW, Winneg KM, Jamieson KH. Did Fact Checking Matter in the 2012 Presidential Campaign? American Behavioral Scientist. 57(11):1558–67.
159.
Nyhan B, Reifler J. Misinformation and Fact-checking: Research Findings from Social Science [Internet]. New America Foundation; Available from: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~nyhan/Misinformation_and_Fact-checking.pdf
160.
Goss Z, Renwick A. ‘Fact-checking and the EU referendum’ - Constitution Unit Blog [Internet]. 23AD. Available from: https://constitution-unit.com/2016/08/23/fact-checking-and-the-eu-referendum/
161.
Mantzarlis A. ‘Fact-checking matters - here are 6 metrics to help prove it’, Poynter [Internet]. 30AD. Available from: http://www.poynter.org/2016/fact-checking-matters-here-are-6-metrics-to-help-prove-it/400582/
162.
Fields L. ‘How the “post-truth” election has put a strain on America’s fact-checkers’ - Vice News [Internet]. 19AD. Available from: https://news.vice.com/story/how-the-post-truth-election-has-put-a-strain-on-americas-fact-checkers
163.
Fox C. ‘Post-truth politics? Don’t be so patronising’ - The Spectator [Internet]. 12AD. Available from: http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/11/post-truth-politics-dont-be-so-patronising/
164.
‘Post-truth politics: Art of the lie’ - The Economist [Internet]. 10AD. Available from: http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21706525-politicians-have-always-lied-does-it-matter-if-they-leave-truth-behind-entirely-art
165.
PolitiFact [Internet]. Available from: http://www.politifact.com/
166.
FactCheck [Internet]. Available from: http://www.factcheck.org/
167.
Full Fact [Internet]. Available from: https://fullfact.org/
168.
LeDuc L. The politics of direct democracy: referendums in global perspective [Internet]. Peterborough, Ont: Broadview Press; 2003. Available from: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3248178
169.
Renwick A. Written evidence to the PACAC inquiry into ’Lessons Learned from the EU Referendum [Internet]. Available from: http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/public-administration-and-constitutional-affairs-committee/lessons-learned-from-the-eu-referendum/written/36930.pdf
170.
Lupia, Arthur. ‘Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections’. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 88(1). Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/214431324/abstract/6F8271453469475EPQ/1?accountid=14511
171.
Renwick A, Lamb M. "The Quality of Referendum Debate: The UK’s Electoral System Referendum in the Print Media”. Electoral Studies. 32(2):294–304.
172.
Vowles J. ‘Campaign Claims, Partisan Cues, and Media Effects in the 2011 British Electoral System Referendum’. Electoral Studies. 32(2):253–64.
173.
Pilon D. "Investigating Media as a Deliberative Space: Newspaper Opinions about Voting Systems in the 2007 Ontario Provincial Referendum”. Canadian Political Science Review [Internet]. 3(3). Available from: http://ojs.unbc.ca/index.php/cpsr/article/view/61
174.
LeDuc L. ‘Referendums and deliberative democracy’. Electoral Studies. 38:139–48.
175.
John Gastil, Robert Richards, Katherine Knobloch. ‘Vicarious Deliberation: How the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review Influenced Deliberation in Mass Elections’. International Journal of Communication [Internet]. 2014;8:62–89. Available from: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2235
176.
Johnson D, Thorsen E, Wring D, editors. EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign [Internet]. CSJCC (Bournmouth University), CRCC (Loughborough University), and Political Studies Association; Available from: http://www.referendumanalysis.eu/
177.
Loughborough University Centre for Research in Communication and Culture. ‘Media Coverage of the EU Referendum (Report 5)’ Centre for Research in Communication and Culture [Internet]. 27AD. Available from: http://blog.lboro.ac.uk/crcc/eu-referendum/uk-news-coverage-2016-eu-referendum-report-5-6-may-22-june-2016/
178.
Goss Z, Renwick A. ‘Fact-checking and the EU referendum’ - The Constitution Unit Blog [Internet]. 23AD. Available from: https://constitution-unit.com/2016/08/23/fact-checking-and-the-eu-referendum/
179.
Brett W. ‘It’s Good to Talk: Doing Referendums Differently after the EU Vote’ - Electoral Reform Society report [Internet]. Available from: http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/sites/default/files/files/publication/Its-good-to-talk-2016-EU-Referendum-Report.pdf
180.
Kobach KW. The History of Direct Democracy in Switzerland [Internet]. Available from: http://www.athene.antenna.nl/MEDIATHEEK/KOBACH-1.html
181.
Lutz G. ‘The Interaction between Direct and Representative Democracy in Switzerland’. Representation. 42(1):45–57.
182.
Christin T, Hug S, Sciarini P. Interests and information in referendum voting: An analysis of Swiss voters. European Journal of Political Research. 41(6):759–76.
183.
Feld LP, Fischer JAV, Kirchgässner G. ‘The Effect of Direct Democracy on Income Redistribution: Evidence for Switzerland’. Economic Inquiry. 48(4):817–40.
184.
Benz M, Stutzer A. ‘Are Voters Better Informed When They Have a Larger Say in Politics? – Evidence for the European Union and Switzerland’. Public Choice. 119(1/2):31–59.
185.
Elster J. Introduction. In: Elster J, editor. Deliberative Democracy [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. p. 1–18. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/deliberative-democracy/introduction/3FC5E20ED505D52C553535159139862E
186.
Bruce Ackerman, James S. Fishkin. Deliberation Day. In: Fishkin JS, Laslett P, editors. Debating Deliberative Democracy [Internet]. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2003. p. 7–30. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9780470690734.ch1
187.
Iris Marion Young. ‘Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy’. Political Theory [Internet]. 29(5):670–90. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3072534?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
188.
Chantal Mouffe. ‘Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?’ Social Research [Internet]. 66(3):745–58. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40971349?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
189.
Parkinson J. ‘Legitimacy Problems in Deliberative Democracy’. Political Studies. 51(1):180–96.
190.
Cooke M. Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy. Political Studies. 48(5):947–69.
191.
Dryzek JS. Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia. Political Theory. 33(2):218–42.
192.
Smith G. Democratic Innovations [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511609848
193.
Smith G, Wales C. ‘Citizens’ Juries and Deliberative Democracy’. Political Studies. 48(1):51–65.
194.
Warren ME, Pearse H, editors. Designing Deliberative Democracy [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511491177
195.
Niemeyer S. ‘The Emancipatory Effect of Deliberation: Empirical Lessons from Mini-Publics’. Politics & Society. 39(1):103–40.
196.
Caluwaerts D, Jacquet V, Reuchamps M. ‘Deliberative Democracy and the So What Question: The Effects of Belgium’s G1000’ - paper delivered at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, 2016. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314120251_Deliberative_Democracy_and_the_So_What_Question_The_Effects_of_Belgium’s_G1000
197.
Renwick A. After the Referendum: Options for a Constitutional Convention [Internet]. Constitution Society; Available from: http://www.consoc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/J1847_Constitution_Society_Report_Cover_WEB.pdf
198.
Böker M. ‘Justification, critique and deliberative legitimacy: The limits of mini-publics’. Contemporary Political Theory. 22AD;
199.
Lafont C. ‘Deliberation, Participation, and Democratic Legitimacy: Should Deliberative Mini-publics Shape Public Policy?’ Journal of Political Philosophy. 23(1):40–63.
200.
Fung, Archon. ‘Deliberation day’ (book review). Journal of Policy Analysis and Management [Internet]. 24(2):472–6. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/222367006/fulltextPDF/9E3348BF81A74879PQ/1?accountid=14511
201.
Chad Flanders. ‘Deliberative Dilemmas: A Critique of Deliberation Day from the Perspective of Election Law’. Journal of Law & Politics [Internet]. 23(2):147–70. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jlp23&id=155
202.
David Schkade, Cass R. Sunstein and Reid Hastie. What Happened on Deliberation Day? California Law Review [Internet]. 95(3):915–40. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20439113?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
203.
Parkinson J, Mansbridge J, editors. Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139178914
