Bibliography for ARCL2028: Current Issues in Archaeological Theory BETA

Adam, B. ‘Perceptions of Time’. Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology, [New ed.], Routledge world reference, Routledge, 2002, pp. 503–26, https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490.

Adam, Barbara. Timewatch: The Social Analysis of Time. Polity Press, 1995.

Alex Mesoudi, Andrew Whiten and Kevin N. Laland. ‘Perspective: Is Human Cultural Evolution Darwinian? Evidence Reviewed from the Perspective of “The Origin of Species”’. Evolution, vol. 58, no. 1, 2004, pp. 1–11, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3449291.

Alison Wylie. ‘Doing Archaeology as a Feminist: Introduction’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 14, no. 3, 2007, pp. 209–16.

Andersson, Claes. ‘Paleolithic Punctuations and Equilibria: Did Retention Rather Than Invention Limit Technological Evolution?’ PaleoAnthropology, 2011, pp. 243–59, http://www.paleoanthro.org/journal/volumes/2011/.

Andrén, Anders and Crozier, Alan. Between Artifacts and Texts: Historical Archaeology in Global Perspective. Plenum Press, 1998.

Andrews, G., et al. ‘Interpretation Not Record: The Practice of Archaeology’. Antiquity, vol. 74, no. 285, 2000, pp. 525–30.

Arnold, B. ‘The Past as Propaganda: Totalitarian Archaeology in Nazi Germany’. Antiquity, vol. 64, no. 244, 1990, pp. 464–78.

Arnold, Dean E. ‘Chapters 5, 8 and 9’. Ceramic Theory and Cultural Process, New studies in archaeology, Cambridge University Press, 1985.

Arnold III, Philip J., and Brian S. Wilkens. ‘On the VanPools’ “scientific” Post-Processualism’. American Antiquity, vol. 66, no. 2, 2001, pp. 361–66.

Arnold, P. ‘Back to Basics: The Middle-Range Program as Pragmatic Archaeology’. Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory, Foundations of archaeological inquiry, University of Utah Press, 2003, pp. 55–66.

Ashmore, Wendy, and Arthur Bernard Knapp. ‘Archaeological Landscapes: Constructed, Conceptualised, Ideational’. Archaeologies of Landscape: Contemporary Perspectives, Social archaeology, Blackwell Publishers, 1999, pp. 1–30.

Atkinson, R. J. C. Stonehenge. Penquin Books in association with Hamish Hamilton, 1960.

Aunger, Robert. Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science. Oxford University Press, 2000.

Bailey, Geoff. ‘Time Perspectives, Palimpsests and the Archaeology of Time’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 26, no. 2, June 2007, pp. 198–223, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2006.08.002.

Bamforth, D. B. ‘Evidence and Metaphor in Evolutionary Archaeology’. American Antiquity, vol. 67, no. 3, 2002, pp. 435–52.

———. ‘What Is Archaeology? (Or Confusion, Sound and Fury, Signifying....)’. American Antiquity, vol. 68, no. 3, 2003, pp. 581–84.

Banks, Iain, et al. Nationalism and Archaeology: Scottish Archaeological Forum. Cruithne Press, 1996.

Barrett , J. C. ‘Agency, the Duality of Structure and the Problem of the Archaeological Record’. Archaeological Theory Today, 2nd ed, Polity, 2012, pp. 141–64.

Barrett, John. ‘The Mythical Landscapes of the British Iron Age’. Archaeologies of Landscape: Contemporary Perspectives, Social archaeology, Blackwell Publishers, 1999, pp. 253–65.

Barrett, John C. Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Blackwell, 1993.

———. Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Blackwell, 1993.

Barrett, John C. ‘The Material Constitution of Humanness’. Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 21, no. 01, June 2014, pp. 65–74, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203814000105.

Bender, Barbara, Christopher Y. Tilley, et al. ‘Chapters 1 and 3’. Stone Worlds: Narrative and Reflexivity in Landscape Archaeology, Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, Left Coast Press, 2007, https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14615901840004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true.

———. ‘Chapters 1 and 3’. Stone Worlds: Narrative and Reflexivity in Landscape Archaeology, Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, Left Coast Press, 2007, https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14615901840004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true.

Bender, Barbara, Sue Hamilton, et al. ‘Leskernick: Stone Worlds; Alternative Narratives; Nested Landscapes.’ Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, vol. 63, 1997, pp. 147–78, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00002413.

Bender, Barbara. ‘Theorising Landscapes, and the Prehistoric Landscape of Stonehenge’. Man, vol. 27, no. 4, 1992, pp. 735–55.

———. ‘Theorising Landscapes, and the Prehistoric Landscape of Stonehenge’. Man, vol. 27, no. 4, 1992, pp. 735–55.

Bender, Barbara and Aitken, Paul. Stonehenge: Making Space. Berg, 1998.

Bentley , A. ‘“Style versus Function” 30 Years On’. Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue, Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, Left Coast, 2011, pp. 83–104.

Bentley, A., and H. D. G. Maschner. ‘Complexity Theory’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories, AltaMira Press, 2008, pp. 245–70.

Bentley, R. Alexander, et al. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. AltaMira Press, 2008, https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780759113602.

Bentley, R. Alexander, et al. ‘R. McGuire’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories, AltaMira Press, 2008, pp. 73–93, https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1.

Bentley, R., and Maschner Alexander. ‘Introduction on Archaeological Theories’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories, AltaMira Press, 2008.

Berggren, A., and Ian Hodder. ‘Social Practice, Method and Some Problems of Field Archaeology’. American Antiquity, vol. 68, no. 3, 2003, pp. 421–34.

Bernbeck, R., and S. Pollock. ‘The Political Economy of Archaeological Practice and the Production of Heritage in the Middle East’. A Companion to Social Archaeology, Social archaeology, Blackwell Pub. Ltd, 2004, pp. 335–52, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605.

Bettinger, Robert L. Hunter-Gatherers: Archaeological and Evolutionary Theory. Plenum Press, 1991.

Binford, Lewis R. . ‘A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design’. American Antiquity, vol. 29, no. 4, 1964, pp. 425–41.

———. ‘A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design’. American Antiquity, vol. 29, no. 4, 1964, pp. 425–41.

———. ‘Archaeological Perspectives’. New Perspectives in Archeology, Aldine, 1968, pp. 5–32.

———. ‘Archaeology as Anthropology’. American Antiquity, vol. 28, no. 2, 1962, pp. 217–25.

———. ‘Archaeology as Anthropology’. American Antiquity, vol. 28, no. 2, 1962, pp. 217–25.

Binford, Lewis R. ‘Behavioral Archaeology and the “Pompeii Premise”’. Journal of Anthropological Research, vol. 37, no. 3, Oct. 1981, pp. 195–208, https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.37.3.3629723.

———. ‘General Introduction’. For Theory Building in Archaeology: Essays on Faunal Remains, Aquatic Resources, Spatial Analysis and Systemic Modeling, Studies in archeology, Academic Press, 1977, pp. 1–10.

———. ‘Interassemblage Variability: The Mousterian and the Functional Argument’. Working at Archaeology, Studies in archeology, Academic Press, 1983, pp. 131–53, https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ffc747cb-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099.

Binford, Lewis R. . ‘Relics to Artifacts and Monuments to Assemblages: Changing Conceptual Frameworks’. Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths, Studies in archaeology, Academic Press, 1981, pp. 3–20.

Binford, Lewis Roberts. Constructing Frames of Reference: An Analytical Method for Archaeological Theory Building Using Hunter-Gatherer and Environmental Data Sets. University of California Press, 2001.

Bintliff, J. L. The Annales School and Archaeology. Leicester University Press, 1991.

Bintliff, J. L. and Pearce, Mark. The Death of Archaeological Theory? Oxbow Books, 2011, https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvh1dk87.

Boone, James L., and Eric Alden Smith. ‘Is It Evolution Yet? A Critique of Evolutionary Archaeology’. Current Anthropology, vol. 39, no. S1, June 1998, pp. S141–74, https://doi.org/10.1086/204693.

Borić, Dušan. Archaeology and Memory. Oxbow Books, 2010.

Boyd, Robert and Richerson, Peter J. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press, 1985.

Bradley, Richard. The Past in Prehistoric Societies. Routledge, 2002.

———. The Significance of Monuments: On the Shaping of Human Experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe. Routledge, 1998.

Bruce G. Trigger. ‘Archaeology and Epistemology: Dialoguing across the Darwinian Chasm’. American Journal of Archaeology, vol. 102, no. 1, 1998, pp. 1–34.

———. ‘Marxism in Contemporary Western Archaeology’. Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 5, 1993, pp. 159–200.

Brück, Joanna. ‘Experiencing the Past? The Development of a Phenomenological Archaeology in British Prehistory’. Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 12, no. 01, Aug. 2005, pp. 45–72, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203805001583.

———. ‘Experiencing the Past? The Development of a Phenomenological Archaeology in British Prehistory’. Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 12, no. 1, Aug. 2005, pp. 45–72, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203805001583.

———. ‘Monuments, Power and Personhood in the British Neolithic’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 7, no. 4, Dec. 2001, pp. 649–67, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00082.

Brumfiel, E. M. ‘On the Archaeology of Choice: Agency Studies as a Research Strategem’. Agency in Archaeology, Routledge, 2000, pp. 249–55.

Buchli, Victor, et al. Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past. Routledge, 2001.

Butzer, Karl W. Archaeology as Human Ecology: Method and Theory for a Contextual Approach. Cambridge University Press, 1982.

Carr, Lydia. Tessa Verney Wheeler: Women and Archaeology before World War Two. Oxford University Press, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199640225.001.0001.

Carrithers, Michael, et al., editors. The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History. Cambridge University Press, 1985.

Casella, Eleanor Conlin and Fowler, Chris. The Archaeology of Plural and Changing Identities: Beyond Identification. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 2005.

Chadwick, A. ‘Post-Processualism, Professionalization and Archaeological Methodologies. Towards Reflexive and Radical Practice’. Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 10, no. 1, 2003, pp. 97–117, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203803001107.

Childe, V. Gordon. ‘Preface and Chapter 1’. The Danube in Prehistory, Clarendon Press, 1929, pp. v-xii-1–7.

———. ‘What Happens in Prehistory?’ Piecing Together the Past: The Interpretation of Archaeological Data, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1956, pp. 135–58, https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c1eea4f3-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099.

Chilton, Elizabeth S. Material Meanings: Critical Approaches to the Interpretation of Material Culture. University of Utah Press, 1999.

Chippindale, C. ‘Ambition, Deference, Discrepancy, Comsumption: The Intellectual Background to a Post-Processual Archaeology’. Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda?, New directions in archaeology, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 27–36.

Chippindale, Christopher. Stonehenge Complete. New and Expanded [3rd] ed, Thames & Hudson, 2004.

———. Who Owns Stonehenge? Batsford, 1990.

Chris Gosden. ‘What Do Objects Want?’ Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 12, no. 3, 2005, pp. 193–211.

Clark, Grahame. Archaeology and Society. 3rd ed, Methuen, 1960.

Clark, Grahame. ‘Economic Approach to Prehistory’. Economic Prehistory: Papers on Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, 1989, pp. 149–68.

Clarke, D. L. ‘Archaeology: The Loss of Innocence’. Antiquity, vol. 47, no. 185, 1973, pp. 6–18.

———. ‘Archaeology: The Loss of Innocence’. Antiquity, vol. 47, no. 185, 1973, pp. 6–18.

Clarke, David L. . ‘Archaeology: The Loss of Innocence’. Antiquity, vol. 47, no. 185, 1973, pp. 6–18.

Clarke, David L. and Chapman, Bob. Analytical Archaeology. 2nd ed, Methuen, 1978.

Cleal, Rosamund, et al. Stonehenge in Its Landscape: Twentieth-Century Excavations. English Heritage, 1995, https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archiveDS/archiveDownload?t=arch-1416-1/dissemination/pdf/978-1850-746058_72.pdf.

Cochrane, E. E. ‘Style, Function and Systematic Empiricism: The Conflation of Process and Pattern’. Style and Function: Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Archaeology, Bergin & Garvey, 2001, pp. 183–202.

Cochrane, Ethan E. and Gardner, Andrew. Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Left Coast, 2011.

———. Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Left Coast, 2011.

Collis, John. Digging up the Past: An Introduction to Archaeological Excavation. Sutton, 2001.

Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C. ‘Archaeology and Indigenous Collaboration’. Archaeological Theory Today, 2nd ed, Polity, 2012, pp. 267–91.

Conkey, Margaret W., and Joan M. Gero. ‘Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology’. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 26, no. 1, Oct. 1997, pp. 411–37, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.411.

Conkey, Margaret W., and J. D. Spector. ‘Archaeology and the Study of Gender’. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 7, 1984, pp. 1–38.

Conolly, J. ‘Catalhoyuk and the Archaeological Object’. Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Çatalhöyük : By Members of the Çatalhöyük Team, McDonald Institute monographs, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2000, pp. 51–56, https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=533279b1-a506-e811-80cd-005056af4099.

Cooper, Nicholas, et al. Roman Imperialism: Post-Colonial Perspectives. School of Archaeological Studies, University of Leicester, 1996.

Cornell, P., and F. Fahlander. ‘Microarchaeology, Materiality and Social Practice’. Current Swedish Archaeology, vol. 10, 2002, pp. 21–38.

Courbin, Paul. What Is Archaeology?: An Essay on the Nature of Archaeological Research. University of Chicago Press, 1988.

Coward, Fiona, et al. ‘The Spread of Neolithic Plant Economies from the Near East to Northwest Europe: A Phylogenetic Analysis’. Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 35, no. 1, Jan. 2008, pp. 42–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2007.02.022.

Cowgill, G. L. ‘Distinguished Lecture in Archaeology: Beyond Criticizing New Archaeology’. American Anthropologist, New Series, vol. 95, no. 3, 1993, pp. 551–73.

Currie, T. E., and R. Mace. ‘Mode and Tempo in the Evolution of Socio-Political Organization: Reconciling “Darwinian” and “Spencerian” Evolutionary Approaches in Anthropology’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 366, no. 1567, Feb. 2011, pp. 1108–17, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0318.

David, Bruno, and Julian Thomas. ‘Landscape Archaeology: Introduction’. Handbook of Landscape Archaeology, World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology, Left Coast Press, 2008, pp. 27–43, https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1.

David J. Meltzer. ‘Paradigms and the Nature of Change in American Archaeology’. American Antiquity, vol. 44, no. 4, 1979, pp. 644–57.

Díaz-Andreu García, Margarita. A World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology: Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past. Oxford University Press, 2007, https://academic-oup-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/40265.

———. The Archaeology of Identity: Approaches to Gender, Age, Status, Ethnicity and Religion. Routledge, 2005.

Diaz-Andreu, M. ‘Britain and the Other: The Archaeology of Imperialism’. History, Nationhood, and the Question of Britain, Palgrave Macmillan, 2004, pp. 227–41.

Dobres, Marcia-Anne. ‘Social Agency and Practice: The Heart and Soul of Technology’. Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology, Social archaeology, Blackwell Publishers, 2000, pp. 127–63.

Dobres, Marcia-Anne. Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology. Blackwell Publishers, 2000.

———. Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology. Blackwell Publishers, 2000.

Dobres, Marcia-Anne, and C. R. Hoffman. ‘Social Agency and the Dynamics of Prehistoric Technology’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 1, no. 3, 1994, pp. 211–58.

Dobres, Marcia-Anne, and John E. Robb. ‘Agency in Archaeology: Paradigm or Platitude?’ Agency in Archaeology, Routledge, 2000, pp. 3–17.

Dornan, J. L. ‘Agency and Archaeology: Past, Present and Future Directions’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 9, no. 4, 2002, pp. 303–29, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021318432161.

Dowson, T.A. . ‘Homosexuality, Queer Theory and Archaeology’. Interpretive Archaeology: A Reader, Leicester University Press, 2000, pp. 283–89.

Dowson, T.A. ‘Homosexuality, Queer Theory and Archaeology’. Interpretive Archaeology: A Reader, Leicester University Press, 2000, pp. 283–89.

Dunnell, R. C. ‘Five Decades of American Archaeology’. American Archaeology, Past and Future: A Celebration of the Society for American Archaeology, 1935-1985, Smithsonian Institution Press, 1986.

———. ‘Style and Function: A Fundamental Dichotomy’. American Antiquity, vol. 43, no. 2, 1978, pp. 192–202.

Dyson, Stephen L. In Pursuit of Ancient Pasts: A History of Classical Archaeology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Yale University Press, 2006, https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1npzcm.

Earle et. al., T. K. ‘Processual Archaeology and the Radical Critique’. Current Anthropology, vol. 28, no. 4, 1987, pp. 501–38.

Edgeworth, Matt. Acts of Discovery: An Ethnography of Archaeological Practice. Archaeopress, 2003.

———. Ethnographies of Archaeological Practice: Cultural Encounters, Material Transformations. Altamira Press, 2006.

Engelstad, E. ‘Images of Power and Contradiction: Feminist Theory and Post-Processual Archaeology’. Antiquity, vol. 65, no. 248, 1991, pp. 502–14.

Englehardt, Joshua. Agency in Ancient Writing. University Press of Colorado, 2013.

Fagan, Brian M. Grahame Clark: An Intellectual Biography of an Archaeologist. Westview, 2001.

Fagan, Garrett G. Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public. Routledge, 2006.

Ferguson, L. ‘Struggling with Pots in Colonial South Carolina’. The Archaeology of Inequality, Social archaeology, Blackwell, 1991, pp. 28–39.

Fewster, Kathryn J. ‘The Role of Agency and Material Culture in Remembering and Forgetting: An Ethnoarchaeological Case Study from Central Spain’. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, vol. 20, no. 1, June 2006, https://doi.org/10.1558//jmea.2007.v20i1.89.

Fisher, Peter, et al. ‘Spatial Analysis of Visible Areas from the Bronze Age Cairns of Mull’. Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 24, no. 7, July 1997, pp. 581–92, https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1996.0142.

Flannery, Kent V. . ‘Archaeological Systems Theory and Early Mesoamerica’. Anthropological Archeology in the Americas, The Anthropological Society of Washington, 1968, pp. 67–87.

———. ‘Culture History vs. Culture Process: A Debate in American Archaeology’. Scientific American, vol. 2, no. 2, 1967, pp. 119–22.

Flannery, Kent V. ‘Process and Agency in Early State Formation’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, 1999, pp. 3–21, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300015183.

———. ‘Process and Agency in Early State Formation’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, 1999, pp. 3–21, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300015183.

———. ‘The Golden Marshalltown: A Parable for the Archeology of the 1980s’. American Anthropologist, vol. 84, no. 2, June 1982, pp. 265–78, https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1982.84.2.02a00010.

Fleming, A. ‘Post-Processual Landscape Archaeology: A Critique’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 16, no. 3, 2006, pp. 267–80, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774306000163.

Fleming, Andrew. ‘Phenomenology and the Megaliths of Wales: A Dreaming Too Far?’ Oxford Journal of Archaeology, vol. 18, no. 2, May 1999, pp. 119–25, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0092.00074.

Fowler, C. ‘Personhood and Social Relations in the British Neolithic with a Study from the Isle of Man’. Journal of Material Culture, vol. 6, no. 2, July 2001, pp. 137–63, https://doi.org/10.1177/135918350100600202.

Fowler, C. . ‘The Individual, the Subject and Archaeological Interpretation: Reading Luce Irigaray and Judith Butler’. Philosophy and Archaeological Practice: Perspectives for the 21st Century, Bricoleur Press, 2000, pp. 107–22.

Fowler, Chris. The Archaeology of Personhood: An Anthropological Approach. Routledge, 2004.

Fowler, D. ‘Archaeological Ethics in Context and Practice’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories, AltaMira Press, 2008, pp. 409–22, https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1.

Frere, S. S. ‘Roman Britain since Haverfield and Richmond’. History and Archaeology Review, vol. 3, 1988, pp. 31–36.

Funari, Pedro Paulo A., et al. Global Archaeological Theory: Contextual Voices and Contemporary Thoughts. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2005.

G. N. Bailey. ‘Concepts of Time in Quaternary Prehistory’. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 12, 1983, pp. 165–92, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155645.

Gardner, A. ‘Action and Structure in Interpretive Archaeologies’. Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue, Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, Left Coast, 2011, pp. 63–82.

———. ‘Agency’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories, AltaMira Press, 2008, pp. 95–108, https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1.

———. ‘Seeking a Material Turn: The Artefactuality of the Roman Empire’. TRAC 2002: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference Which Took Place at the University of Kent at Canterbury 5-6 April 2002, Oxbow Books, 2003, pp. 1–13.

———. ‘Time and Empire in the Roman World’. Journal of Social Archaeology, vol. 12, no. 2, June 2012, pp. 145–66, https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605312439971.

Gardner, Andrew. An Archaeology of Identity: Soldiers and Society in Late Roman Britain. Left Coast Press, 2007, https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9781315435091/archaeology-identity-andrew-gardner.

———. An Archaeology of Identity: Soldiers and Society in Late Roman Britain. Left Coast Press, 2007, https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9781315435091/archaeology-identity-andrew-gardner.

Gaydarska, B. ‘A Brief History of TAG’. Antiquity, vol. 83, no. 322, 2009, pp. 1152–62.

Gell, Alfred. The Anthropology of Time: Cultural Constructions of Temporal Maps and Images. Berg, 1992.

Geller, Pamela L. ‘Identity and Difference: Complicating Gender in Archaeology’. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 38, no. 1, Oct. 2009, pp. 65–81, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164414.

Geoff Emberling. ‘Ethnicity in Complex Societies: Archaeological Perspectives’. Journal of Archaeological Research, vol. 5, no. 4, 1997, pp. 295–344.

Gero, Joan M. ‘Archaeological Practice and Gendered Encounters with Field Data’. Gender and Archaeology, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996, pp. 251–80.

Gero, Joan M., and Margaret Wright. ‘Tensions, Pluralities and Engendering Archaeology: An Introduction to Women and Prehistory’. Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Social archaeology, Blackwell, 1991, pp. 3–30.

Gheorghiu, Dragos, and George Nash. Place as Material Culture: Objects, Geographies and the Construction of Time. Cambridge Scholars Pub, 2013.

Gilchrist, R. ‘Archaeology and the Life Course: A Time and Age for Gender’. A Companion to Social Archaeology, Social archaeology, Blackwell Pub. Ltd, 2004, pp. 142–60, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605.

Gilchrist, Roberta. ‘Women’s Archaeology? Political Feminism, Gender Theory and Historical Revision’. Antiquity, vol. 65, no. 248, 1991, pp. 495–501.

Glenn R. Storey. ‘Archaeology and Roman Society: Integrating Textual and Archaeological Data’. Journal of Archaeological Research, vol. 7, no. 3, 1999, pp. 203–48.

Gordon Childe, Vere. ‘Changing Aims and Methods in Prehistory’. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, vol. 1, 1935, pp. 1–15, http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2028_47033.pdf.

Gosden, C. ‘The Past and Foreign Countries: Colonial and Post-Colonial Archaeology and Anthropology’. A Companion to Social Archaeology, Social archaeology, Blackwell Pub. Ltd, 2004, pp. 161–78, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605.

Gosden, C., and Y. Marshall. ‘The Cultural Biography of Objects’. World Archaeology, vol. 31, no. 2, 1999, pp. 169–78.

Gosden, Chris. ‘Postcolonial Archaeology. Issues of Culture, Identity and Knowledge’. Archaeological Theory Today, 2nd ed, Polity, 2012, pp. 241–61.

Gosden, Chris. Social Being and Time. Blackwell, 1994.

Graves-Brown, P. ‘In Search of the Watchmaker: Attribution of Agency in Natural and Cultural Selection’. Darwinian Archaeologies, Interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology, Plenum Press, 1996, pp. 165–81.

Greene, Kevin. ‘Chapter 6: Making Sense of the Past’. Archaeology: An Introduction, 5th ed, Routledge, 2010, pp. 249–312, http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203835975.

Greene, Kevin and Moore, Tom. Archaeology: An Introduction. 5th ed, Routledge, 2010, https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/62879?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1.

Greg Woolf. ‘The Present State and Future Scope of Roman Archaeology: A Comment’. American Journal of Archaeology, vol. 108, no. 3, 2004, pp. 417–28.

Hales, Shelley and Hodos, Tamar. Material Culture and Social Identities in the Ancient World. Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Hamilton et al., Sue . ‘Quarried Away: Thinking about Landscapes of Megalithic Construction on Rapa Nui (Easter Island)’. Handbook of Landscape Archaeology, World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology, Left Coast Press, 2008, pp. 176–86, https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1.

Hamilton, S., et al. ‘Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach’. European Journal of Archaeology, vol. 9, no. 1, Apr. 2006, pp. 31–71, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461957107077704.

———. ‘Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach’. European Journal of Archaeology, vol. 9, no. 1, Apr. 2006, pp. 31–71, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461957107077704.

Hamilton, Sue, et al. ‘Introduction and Section 1’. Archaeology and Women: Ancient & Modern Issues, Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, Left Coast Press, 2007, pp. 13–40.

———. ‘Lost in Translation? A Comment on the Excavation Report’. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, vol. 10, Aug. 1999, pp. 1–8, https://doi.org/10.5334/pia.140.

Hamilton, Sue . ‘The Ambiguity of Landscape: Discussing Points of Relatedness in Concepts and Methods’. Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue, Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, Left Coast, 2011, pp. 263–80.

Hannah, Robert. Time in Antiquity. Routledge, 2009.

Harding, Jan. ‘Rethinking the Great Divide: Long‐Term Structural History and the Temporality of Event’. Norwegian Archaeological Review, vol. 38, no. 2, Nov. 2005, pp. 88–101, https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650510032707.

Harris, David R., et al. The Archaeology of V. Gordon Childe: Contemporary Perspectives : Proceedings of the V. Gordon Childe Centennial Conference Held at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 8-9 May 1992 under the Auspices of the Institute of Archaeology and the Prehistoric Society. UCL Press, 1994.

Hassan, Fekri. ‘Beyond the Surface: Comments on Hodder’s Reflexive Excavation Methodology’. Antiquity, vol. 71, no. 274, 1997, pp. 1020–25.

Hassan, Fekri A. ‘Beyond the Surface: Comments on Hodder’s “Reflexive Excavation Methodology”’. Antiquity, vol. 71, no. 274, 1997, pp. 1020–25.

Hastorf, C. ‘Gender, Space and Food in Prehistory’. Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Social archaeology, Blackwell, 1991, pp. 132–59.

Hastorf, Christine Ann and Conkey, Margaret Wright. The Uses of Style in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Hawkes, Christopher. ‘Wenner-Gren Foundation Supper Conference - Archaeological Theory and Method: Some Suggestiongs from the Old World’. American Anthropologist, vol. 56, no. 2, 1954, pp. 155–68, https://www.jstor.org/stable/664357.

Hayden, Brian, and Aubrey Cannon. ‘Where the Garbage Goes: Refuse Disposal in the Maya Highlands’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 2, no. 2, June 1983, pp. 117–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7.

Hays-Gilpin, K. ‘Gender’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories, AltaMira Press, 2008, pp. 335–49, https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1.

Hegmon, M. ‘Archaeological Research on Style’. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 21, 1992, pp. 517–36, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002505.

———. ‘Setting Theoretical Egos aside: Issues and Theory in North American Archaeology’. American Antiquity, vol. 68, no. 2, 2003, pp. 213–43.

Henson, Donald. Doing Archaeology: A Subject Guide for Students. Routledge, 2012, https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9780203109878/archaeology-donald-henson.

Higgs, E. S., and C. Vita-Finzi. ‘Prehistoric Economies: A Territorial Approach’. Papers in Economic Prehistory: Studies by Members and Associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture, Cambridge University Press, 1972, pp. 27–36.

Hill, Erica. ‘Gender-Informed Archaeology: The Priority of Definition, the Use of Analogy, and the Multivariate Approach’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 5, no. 1, Mar. 1998, pp. 99–128, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428417.

Hill, J. N., and R. K. Evans. ‘A Model for Classification and Typology’. Models in Archaeology, Methuen, 1972, pp. 231–73.

Hingley, R. ‘Hadrian’s Wall in Theory: Pursuing New Agendas’. Understanding Hadrian’s Wall: Papers from a Conference Held at South Shields, 3rd-5th November 2006, to Mark the Publication of the 14th Edition of the Handbook to the Roman Wall, Arbeia Society, 2008, pp. 25–28.

———. ‘“The Most Ancient Boundary between England and Scotland”: Genealogies of the Roman Walls’. Classical Receptions Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, May 2010, pp. 25–43, https://doi.org/10.1093/crj/clq001.

Hingley, Richard. ‘Chapters 9 and 10’. Roman Officers and English Gentlemen: The Imperial Origins of Roman Archaeology, Routledge, 2000.

Hingley, Richard. Roman Officers and English Gentlemen: The Imperial Origins of Roman Archaeology. Routledge, 2000.

Hodder, I. ‘Bridging the Divide: A Commentary on Theoretical Roman Archaeology’. Theoretical Roman Archaeology: First Conference Proceedings, Wordwide archaeology series, Avebury, 1993, pp. xiii–xix.

———. ‘Chapter 1: The Problem’. Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology, 3rd ed, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 1–19.

———. ‘Human-Thing Entanglement: Towards an Integrated Archaeological Perspective’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 17, no. 1, 2011, pp. 154–77, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x.

———. ‘Material Practice, Symbolism and Ideology’. Theory and Practice in Archaeology, Material cultures, Routledge, 1992, pp. 201–12.

———. ‘Material Practice, Symbolism and Ideology’. Theory and Practice in Archaeology, Material cultures, Routledge, 1992, pp. 201–12, https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6f7f0b8f-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099.

———. ‘Post-Modernism, Post-Structuralism and Post-Processual Archaeology’. The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression, One world archaeology, Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic, 1989, pp. 64–78.

———. ‘Theoretical Archaeology: A Reactionary View’. Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, New directions in archaeology, Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp. 92–121.

Hodder, Ian, et al. ‘40 Years of Theoretical Engagement: A Conversation with Ian Hodder’. Norwegian Archaeological Review, vol. 41, no. 1, June 2008, pp. 26–42, https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650802181154.

———. ‘Always Momentary, Fluid and Flexible: Towards a Reflexive Excavation Methodology’. Antiquity, vol. 71, no. 273, 1997, pp. 691–700.

———. ‘“Always Momentary, Fluid and Flexible”: Towards a Reflexive Excavation Methodology’. Antiquity, vol. 71, no. 273, 1997, pp. 691–700.

Hodder, Ian. Archaeological Theory Today. Polity, 2001, https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451.

Hodder, Ian. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.

Hodder, Ian. Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past. Routledge, 1994.

Hodder, Ian. ‘Interpretive Archaeology and Its Role’. American Antiquity, vol. 56, no. 1, 1991, pp. 7–18.

———. ‘Introduction: A Review of Contemporary Theoretical Debate in Archaeology’. Archaeological Theory Today, Polity, 2001, pp. 1–13, https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451.

———. ‘Introduction: Contemporary Theoretical Debate in Archaeology’. Archaeological Theory Today, 2nd ed, Polity, 2012, pp. 1–14.

———. ‘Postprocessual Archaeology’. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 8, 1985, pp. 1–26.

Hodder, Ian. Symbols in Action: Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture. Cambridge University Press, 1982.

———. The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Blackwell, 1999.

Hodder, Ian. ‘Towards a Reflexive Method’. The Archaeological Process: An Introduction, Blackwell, 1999, pp. 80–104.

———. ‘Towards a Reflexive Method’. The Archaeological Process: An Introduction, Blackwell, 1999, pp. 80–104.

Hodder, Ian . ‘Whose Rationality? A Response to Fekri Hassan’. Antiquity, vol. 72, no. 275, 1998, pp. 213–17.

Hodder, Ian. ‘Writing Archaeology: Site Reports in Context’. Theory and Practice in Archaeology, Material cultures, Routledge, 1992, pp. 263–74.

Hodder, Ian, and Scott Hutson. Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. Third edition, Cambridge University Press, 2003, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814211.

Hoffman, Christopher R. and Dobres, Marcia-Anne. The Social Dynamics of Technology: Practice, Politics, and World Views. Smithsonian Institution Press, 1999.

Holdaway, Simon and Wandsnider, LuAnn. Time in Archaeology: Time Perspectivism Revisited. University of Utah Press, 2008, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=3443820.

Hutson, S. R. ‘Synergy through Disunity, Science as Social Practice: Comments on VanPool and VanPool’. American Antiquity, vol. 66, no. 2, 2001, pp. 349–60.

Ian Hodder. ‘Postprocessual Archaeology’. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 8, 1985, pp. 1–26.

Ian Hodder and Mark Hassall. ‘The Non-Random Spacing of Romano-British Walled Towns’. Man, vol. 6, no. 3, 1971, pp. 391–407.

Ingold, T. ‘Materials against Materiality’. Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 14, no. 1, 2007, pp. 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203807002127.

Ingold, Tim. ‘The Temporality of the Landscape’. World Archaeology, vol. 25, no. 2, 1993, pp. 152–74.

James R. Sackett. ‘The Meaning of Style in Archaeology: A General Model’. American Antiquity, vol. 42, no. 3, 1977, pp. 369–80.

James, S. ‘Celts, Politics and Motivation in Archaeology’. Antiquity, vol. 72, no. 275, 1998, pp. 200–09.

———. ‘Roman Archaeology: Crisis and Revolution’. Antiquity, vol. 77, no. 295, 2003, pp. 178–84, http://search.proquest.com/docview/217561304?accountid=14511.

James, Simon, et al. Britons and Romans: Advancing an Archaeological Agenda. Council for British Archaeology, 2001.

———. The Atlantic Celts: Ancient People or Modern Invention? British Museum Press, 1999.

James, Simon. ‘Writing the Legions: The Development and Future of Roman Military Studies in Britain’. Archaeological Journal, vol. 159, no. 1, Jan. 2002, pp. 1–58, https://doi.org/10.1080/00665983.2002.11020514.

Johnson, M. ‘On the Nature of Theoretical Archaeology and Archaeological Theory’. Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 13, no. 2, 2006, pp. 117–32, https://doi.org/10.1017/S138020380621208X.

Johnson, M. H. ‘Rethinking Historical Archaeology’. Historical Archaeology: Back from the Edge, One world archaeology, Routledge, 1999, pp. 23–36.

Johnson, Matthew. Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed, Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.

Johnson, Matthew. ‘Chapters 6 and 7’. Archaeological Theory: An Introduction, 2nd ed, Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.

———. ‘Common Sense Is Not Enough’. Archaeological Theory: An Introduction, 2nd ed, Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 1–11.

Johnson, Matthew H. ‘Conceptions of Agency in Archaeological Interpretation’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 8, no. 2, June 1989, pp. 189–211, https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(89)90024-X.

Jones, Andrew. Archaeological Theory and Scientific Practice. Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Jones, S. . ‘Chapter 2’. The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present, Routledge, 1997.

Jones, S. ‘Discourses of Identity in the Interpretation of the Past’. Interpretive Archaeology: A Reader, Leicester University Press, 2000, pp. 445–57.

———. ‘Ethnicity: Theoretical Approaches, Methodological Implications’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories, AltaMira Press, 2008, pp. 321–33.

Jones, S. The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. Routledge, 1997.

Joyce, R. ‘Embodied Subjectivity: Gender, Feminity, Masculinity, Sexuality’. A Companion to Social Archaeology, Social archaeology, Blackwell Pub. Ltd, 2004, pp. 82–95, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605.

Joyce, R. A. ‘Unintended Consequences? Monumentality as a Novel Experience in Formative Mesoamerica’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 11, no. 1, 2004, pp. 5–29.

Joyce, Rosemary A. ‘Archaeology of the Body’. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 34, no. 1, Oct. 2005, pp. 139–58, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143729.

Karlin, C., and M. Julien. ‘Prehistoric Technology: A Cognitive Science?’ The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology, New directions in archaeology, Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 152–63, https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9780511598388A029/type/book_part.

Karlsson, Håkan. It’s about Time: The Concept of Time in Archaeology. Bricoleur, 2001.

Kent G. Lightfoot, Antoinette Martinez and Ann M. Schiff. ‘Daily Practice and Material Culture in Pluralistic Social Settings: An Archaeological Study of Culture Change and Persistence from Fort Ross, California’. American Antiquity, vol. 63, no. 2, 1998, pp. 199–222.

Knapp, A. Bernard, and Lynn Meskell. ‘Bodies of Evidence on Prehistoric Cyprus’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 7, no. 02, 1997, pp. 183–204, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300001931.

Knapp, A. Bernard, and Peter van Dommelen. ‘Past Practices: Rethinking Individuals and Agents in Archaeology’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 18, no. 01, Feb. 2008, pp. 15–34, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774308000024.

Knappet, C. ‘Materiality’. Archaeological Theory Today, 2nd ed, Polity, 2012, pp. 188–207.

Knappett, C. ‘Photographs, Skeuomorphs and Marionettes: Some Thoughts on Mind, Agency and Object’. Journal of Material Culture, vol. 7, no. 1, Mar. 2002, pp. 97–117, https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183502007001307.

Knappett, Carl. An Archaeology of Interaction: Network Perspectives on Material Culture and Society. Oxford University Press, 2011, https://academic.oup.com/book/1407.

———. Thinking through Material Culture: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005, https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt3fhh6q.

Knappett, Carl and Malafouris, Lambros. Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach. Springer, 2008.

Kohl, Philip L. ‘Nationalism and Archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past’. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 27, no. 1, Oct. 1998, pp. 223–46, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.223.

———. ‘Nationalism and Archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past’. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 27, no. 1, Oct. 1998, pp. 223–46, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.223.

Kohl, Philip L., and Clare Fawcett. ‘Archaeology in the Service of the State: Theoretical Considerations’. Nationalism, Politics, and the Practice of Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 3–18.

Kristiansen, K. ‘Genes versus Agents: A Discussion of the Widening Theoretical Gap in Archaeology’. Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 11, no. 2, 2004, pp. 77–99, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203805211509.

Kristiansen, Kristian. ‘Genes versus Agents. A Discussion of the Widening Theoretical Gap in Archaeology’. Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 11, no. 2, Dec. 2004, pp. 77–99, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203805211509.

Lake, Mark. ‘Viewing Space’. World Archaeology, vol. 39, no. 1, 2007, pp. 1–3.

LaMotta, V., and M. Schiffer. ‘Behavioral Archaeology. Towards a New Synthesis’. Archaeological Theory Today, Polity, 2001, https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451.

LaMotta, V., and M. Schiffer. ‘Behavioral Archaeology. Towards a New Synthesis’. Archaeological Theory Today, Rev. and Updated ed, Polity, 2012, pp. 14–64.

Layton, R. ‘Structuralism and Semiotics’. Handbook of Material Culture, SAGE, 2006, pp. 29–42, http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781446206430.

Layton, Robert. Who Needs the Past?: Indigenous Values and Archaeology. Routledge, 1994.

Lemonnier, Pierre. ‘The Study of Material Culture Today: Toward an Anthropology of Technical Systems’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 5, no. 2, June 1986, pp. 147–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(86)90012-7.

Leone et al., M. ‘Can an African-American Historical Archaeology Be an Alternative Voice?’ Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past, Routledge, 1994, pp. 110–24.

Leone, M. ‘Symbolic, Structural and Critical Archaeology’. American Archaeology, Past and Future: A Celebration of the Society for American Archaeology, 1935-1985, Smithsonian Institution Press, 1986, pp. 415–38.

Leone, M. . ‘Towards a Critical Archaeology’. Current Anthropology, vol. 28, no. 3, 1987, pp. 283–302.

Leone, M., and R. Preucel. ‘Archaeology in a Democratic Society: A Critical Perspective’. Quandaries and Quests: Visions of Archaeology’s Future, Occasional paper / Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 1992, pp. 115–35.

Leone, Mark P. Contemporary Archaeology: A Guide to Theory and Contributions. Feffer & Simons, 1972.

———. The Archaeology of Liberty in an American Capital: Excavations in Annapolis. University of California Press, 2005, https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1ppc5g.

Lipo, Carl P. and Society for American Archaeology. Mapping Our Ancestors: Phylogenetic Approaches in Anthropology and Prehistory. Aldine Transaction, 2006.

Llobera, M. ‘Exploring the Topography of Mind: GIS, Social Space and Archaeology’. Antiquity, vol. 70, no. 269, 1996, pp. 612–22.

Lucas, Gavin. ‘Introduction: Archaeology and the Field’. Critical Approaches to Fieldwork: Contemporary and Historical Archaeological Practice, Routledge, 2001, pp. 1–17.

Lucas, Gavin. The Archaeology of Time. Routledge, 2005.

Lucas, Gavin. ‘Time and Archaeological Event’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 18, no. 01, Feb. 2008, pp. 59–65, https://doi.org/10.1017/S095977430800005X.

———. Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge University Press, 2012, https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511845772.

Lydon, Jane and Rizvi, Uzma Z. Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology. Left Coast Press, 2010, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=911816.

Lyman, R. L. ‘What Is the `process’ in Cultural Process and in Processual Archaeology?’ Anthropological Theory, vol. 7, no. 2, June 2007, pp. 217–50, https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499607077299.

Lyman, R. L., and M. J. O’Brien. ‘A History of Normative Theory in Americanist Archaeology’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 11, no. 4, 2004, pp. 369–96.

Lyman, R. Lee, et al. The Rise and Fall of Culture History. Plenum Press, 1997.

Lyman, R.Lee, and Michael J. O’Brien. ‘Measuring and Explaining Change in Artifact Variation with Clade-Diversity Diagrams’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 19, no. 1, Mar. 2000, pp. 39–74, https://doi.org/10.1006/jaar.1999.0339.

Mace, Ruth, et al. The Evolution of Cultural Diversity: A Phylogenetic Approach. UCL Press, 2005.

MacGregor, G. ‘Post-Processual Archaeology: The Hidden Agenda of the Secret Agent’. Archaeological Theory: Progress or Posture?, Worldwide archaeology series, Avebury, 1994, pp. 79–91.

Mackenzie, Iain M. Archaeological Theory: Progress or Posture? Avebury, 1994.

———. Archaeological Theory: Progress or Posture? Avebury, 1994.

Madonna L. Moss. ‘Rifts in the Theoretical Landscape of Archaeology in the United States: A Comment on Hegmon and Watkins’. American Antiquity, vol. 70, no. 3, 2005, pp. 581–87.

Margaret W. Conkey. ‘Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology?’ Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 14, no. 3, 2007, pp. 285–310.

———. ‘Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology?’ Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 14, no. 3, 2007, pp. 285–310.

Martinón-Torres, Marcos. ‘Chaîne Opératoire: The Concept and Its Aplications within the Study of Technology’. Gallaecia, vol. 21, 2002, pp. 29–43, https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=fb4bab91-db3d-ee11-8457-0050f2f06092.

Maschner, Herbert D. G., et al. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. AltaMira Press, 2008.

Mason, David J. P. and Symonds, Matthew F. A. Frontiers of Knowledge: A Research Framework for Hadrian’s Wall, Part of the Frontiers of the Roman Empire World Heritage Site. Durham County Council and Durham University, 2009.

McGlade, James. ‘Archaeology and the Evolution of Cultural Landscapes: Towards an Interdisciplinary Agenda’. The Archaeology and Anthropology of Landscape: Shaping Your Landscape, One world archaeology, Routledge, 1999, pp. 458–82.

McGuire, R. ‘Contested Pasts: Archaeology and Native Americans’. A Companion to Social Archaeology, Social archaeology, Blackwell Pub. Ltd, 2004, pp. 374–95.

McGuire, Randall H. Archaeology as Political Action. University of California Press, 2008.

Megaw, J. V. S., and M. R. Megaw. ‘Ancient Celts and Modern Ethnicity’. Antiquity, vol. 70, no. 267, 1996, pp. 175–81.

Meskell, Lynn. ‘Archaeologies of Identity’. Archaeological Theory Today, 2nd ed, Polity, 2012, pp. 187–213.

Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of Materiality. Blackwell, 2006.

———. Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class et Cetera in Ancient Egypt. Blackwell, 1999.

———. Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class et Cetera in Ancient Egypt. Blackwell, 1999.

———. Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class et Cetera in Ancient Egypt. Blackwell, 1999.

———. Archaeology under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Routledge, 1998.

———. Object Worlds in Ancient Egypt: Material Biographies Past and Present. Berg, 2004.

Meskell, Lynn. ‘The Intersections of Identity and Politics in Archaeology’. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 31, no. 1, Oct. 2002, pp. 279–301, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085457.

Meskell, Lynn and Joyce, Rosemary A. Embodied Lives: Figuring Ancient Maya and Egyptian Experience. Routledge, 2003.

———. Embodied Lives: Figuring Ancient Maya and Egyptian Experience. Routledge, 2003.

Meskell, Lynn and Preucel, Robert W. A Companion to Social Archaeology. Blackwell Pub. Ltd, 2004, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605.

Michael Shanks. ‘Symmetrical Archaeology’. World Archaeology, vol. 39, no. 4, 2007, pp. 589–96.

Michelle Hegmon. ‘No More Theory Wars: A Response to Moss’. American Antiquity, vol. 70, no. 3, 2005, pp. 588–90.

———. ‘Setting Theoretical Egos Aside: Issues and Theory in North American Archaeology’. American Antiquity, vol. 68, no. 2, 2003, pp. 213–43.

Miller, D. ‘Artefacts and the Meaning of Things’. Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology, [New ed.], Routledge world reference, Routledge, 2002, pp. 396–419, https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490.

Miller, Daniel. Materiality. Duke University Press, 2005, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386711?locatt=mode:legacy.

Miller, Daniel, and Christopher Y. Tilley. ‘Ideology, Power and Prehistory: An Introduction’. Ideology, Power and Prehistory, New directions in archaeology, Cambridge University Press, 1984, pp. 1–15.

Mithen, Steven J. The Prehistory of the Mind: A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion and Science. Thames & Hudson, 1996.

———. Thoughtful Foragers: A Study of Prehistoric Decision Making. Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Mizoguchi, Kōji. Archaeology, Society and Identity in Modern Japan. Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Moore, Henrietta L. ‘Bodies on the Move: Gender, Power and Material Culture’. A Passion for Difference: Essays in Anthropology and Gender, Polity, 1994, pp. 71–85.

Moore, T. ‘Detribalizing the Later Prehistoric Past: Concepts of Tribes in Iron Age and Roman Studies’. Journal of Social Archaeology, vol. 11, no. 3, Oct. 2011, pp. 334–60, https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605311403861.

Moshenska, Gabriel and Dhanjal, Sarah. Community Archaeology: Themes, Methods and Practices. Oxbow, 2012, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1154191.

Murray, T. ‘Communication and the Importance of Disciplinary Communities: Who Owns the Past?’ Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda?, New directions in archaeology, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 105–16.

Murray, Tim and World Archaeological Congress. Time and Archaeology. Routledge, 1999.

Mytum, Harold. ‘Materiality and Memory: An Archaeological Perspective on the Popular Adoption of Linear Time in Britain’. Antiquity, vol. 81, no. 312, 2007, pp. 381–96, http://search.proquest.com/docview/217581355?accountid=14511.

Nancy D. Munn. ‘The Cultural Anthropology of Time: A Critical Essay’. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 21, 1992, pp. 93–123, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155982.

Nanni, G. ‘Time, Empire and Resistance in Settler-Colonial Victoria’. Time & Society, vol. 20, no. 1, Mar. 2011, pp. 5–33, https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X10369765.

Nelson, M. C. ‘The Study of Technological Organization’. Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 3, 1991, pp. 57–100.

Nelson, Sarah M. Handbook of Gender in Archaeology. AltaMira Press, 2006.

Nesbitt, C., and D. Tolia-Kelly. ‘Hadrian’s Wall: Embodied Archaeologies of the Linear Monument’. Journal of Social Archaeology, vol. 9, no. 3, Sept. 2009, pp. 368–90, https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605309338428.

O’Brien, Michael J., et al. Archaeology as a Process: Processualism and Its Progeny. University of Utah Press, 2005.

———. Archaeology as a Process: Processualism and Its Progeny. University of Utah Press, 2005.

O’Brien, Michael J. ‘Style, Function, Transmission: An Introduction’. Style, Function, Transmission: Evolutionary Archaeological Perspectives, Foundations of archaeological inquiry, University of Utah Press, 2003, pp. 1–32.

———. ‘What Is Evolution? A Response to Bamforth’. American Antiquity, vol. 68, no. 3, 2003, pp. 573–80.

Olsen, B. ‘Symmetical Archaeology’. Archaeological Theory Today, 2nd ed, Polity, 2012, pp. 208–28.

Olsen, Bjørnar. Archaeology: The Discipline of Things. University of California Press, 2012.

Olsen, BjØrnar. ‘Material Culture after Text: Re‐membering Things’. Norwegian Archaeological Review, vol. 36, no. 2, Oct. 2003, pp. 87–104, https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650310000650.

Papaconstantinou, Demetra. Deconstructing Context: A Critical Approach to Archaeological Practice. Oxbow, 2006.

Parker Pearson et. al., M. ‘Stonehenge, Its River and Its Landscape: Unravelling the Mysteries of a Prehistoric Sacred Place’. Archäologischer Anzeiger: Beiblatt Zum Jahrbuch Des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, vol. 1, 2006, pp. 237–58.

———. ‘The Age of Stonehenge’. Antiquity, vol. 81, no. 313, 2007, pp. 617–39.

———. ‘Who Was Buried at Stonehenge?’ Antiquity, vol. 83, no. 319, 2009, pp. 23–39.

Parker Pearson, M. and Ramilisonina. ‘Stonehenge for the Ancestors: The Stones Pass on the Message’. Antiquity, vol. 72, no. 276, 1998, pp. 308–26.

———. ‘Stonehenge for the Ancestors: The Stones Pass on the Message’. Antiquity, vol. 72, no. 276, 1998, pp. 308–26.

Patrik, L. E. ‘Is There an Archaeological Record?’ Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 8, 1985, pp. 27–62.

Patterson, T. ‘Social Archaeology and Marxist Social Thought’. A Companion to Social Archaeology, Social archaeology, Blackwell Pub. Ltd, 2004, pp. 66–81, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605.

Patterson, Thomas Carl. Marx’s Ghost: Conversations with Archaeologists. Berg, 2003, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474215121.

Pauketat, T. R. ‘Practice and History in Archaeology: An Emerging Paradigm’. Anthropological Theory, vol. 1, no. 1, Mar. 2001, pp. 73–98, https://doi.org/10.1177/146349960100100105.

———. ‘Practice and History in Archaeology: An Emerging Paradigm’. Anthropological Theory, vol. 1, no. 1, Mar. 2001, pp. 73–98, https://doi.org/10.1177/146349960100100105.

Pearson, M. P. ‘Materializing Stonehenge: The Stonehenge Riverside Project and New Discoveries’. Journal of Material Culture, vol. 11, nos 1–2, July 2006, pp. 227–61, https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183506063024.

Pearson, Mike Parker, et al. ‘Resolving the Human Remains Crisis in British Archaeology’. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, vol. 21, 2011, pp. 5–9, https://doi.org/10.5334/pia.369.

Pfaffenberger, Bryan. ‘Social Anthropology of Technology’. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 21, no. 1, Oct. 1992, pp. 491–516, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002423.

Plog, F. ‘Laws, Systems of Laws and the Explanation of Observed Variation’. The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory, Duckworth, 1973, pp. 649–61.

Pluciennik, Mark, et al. Thinking through the Body: Archaeologies of Corporeality. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2002.

Pope, Rachel. ‘Processual Archaeology and Gender Politics. The Loss of Innocence’. Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 18, no. 01, Apr. 2011, pp. 59–86, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203811000134.

———. ‘Processual Archaeology and Gender Politics. The Loss of Innocence’. Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 18, no. 1, 2011, pp. 59–86, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203811000134.

Powell, A., et al. ‘Late Pleistocene Demography and the Appearance of Modern Human Behavior’. Science, vol. 324, no. 5932, June 2009, pp. 1298–301, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170165.

Praetzellis, Adrian. Death by Theory: A Tale of Mystery and Archaeological Theory. AltaMira Press, 2000.

Preucel, R. W. ‘The Postprocessual Condition’. Journal of Archaeological Research, vol. 3, no. 2, 1995, pp. 147–75.

Preucel, R. W., and S. A. Mrozowski. ‘The New Pragmatism’. Contemporary Archaeology in Theory: The New Pragmatism, 2nd ed, Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 3–49.

Preucel, Robert, and Alexander Bauer. ‘Archaeological Pragmatics’. Norwegian Archaeological Review, vol. 34, no. 2, 2001, pp. 85–96, https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650127469.

Preucel, Robert W. Archaeological Semiotics. Blackwell, 2006.

Price, Barbara J. ‘Cultural Materialism: A Theoretical Review’. American Antiquity, vol. 47, no. 4, 1982, pp. 709–41.

Quirke, Stephen. Hidden Hands: Egyptian Workforces in Petrie Excavation Archives, 1880-1924. Gerald Duckworth, 2010.

R. Alexander Bentley, Matthew W. Hahn and Stephen J. Shennan. ‘Random Drift and Culture Change’. Proceedings: Biological Sciences, vol. 271, no. 1547, 2004, pp. 1443–50, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4142981.

Ratnagar, Shereen. ‘Archaeology at the Heart of a Political Confrontation: The Case of Ayodhya’. Current Anthropology, vol. 45, no. 2, Apr. 2004, pp. 239–59, https://doi.org/10.1086/381044.

Rautman, Alison E. and Gender and Archaeology Conference. Reading the Body: Representations and Remains in the Archaeological Record. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000.

Redman, C. ‘The Development of Archaeological Theory’. Companion Encyclopedia of Archaeology, Routledge, 1999, pp. 48–80.

Redman, C. L. ‘Distinguished Lecture in Archaeology: In Defence of the Seventies - The Adolescence of New Archaeology’. American Anthropologist, vol. 93, no. 2, 1991, pp. 295–307.

Redman, Charles L. Social Archeology: Beyond Subsistence and Dating. Academic Press, 1978.

Rega, E. ‘Age, Gender and Biological Reality in the Early Bronze Age Cemetery at Mokrin’. Invisible People and Processes: Writing Gender and Childhood into European Archaeology, Leicester University Press, 1996, pp. 229–47.

Reid, Donald M. Whose Pharaohs?: Archaeology, Museums, and Egyptian National Identity from Napoleon to World War I. University of California Press, 2002.

Reinhard Bernbeck and Susan Pollock. ‘Ayodhya, Archaeology, and Identity’. Current Anthropology, vol. 37, no. 1, 1996, pp. S138–42.

Renfrew, C. ‘Towards a Cognitive Archaeology’. The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology, New directions in archaeology, Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 3–12.

Renfrew, Colin. ‘Beyond Diffusion’. Before Civilization: The Radiocarbon Revolution and Prehistoric Europe, Pimlico, 1999, pp. 109–19.

Renfrew, Colin . ‘Culture Systems and the Multiplier Effect’. The Emergence of Civilisation: The Cyclades and the Aegean in the Third Millennium B.C., Studies in prehistory, Methuen, 1972, pp. 19–44.

———. ‘Monuments, Mobilization and Social Organisation in Neolithic Wessex’. The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory, Duckworth, 1973, pp. 539–58.

———. ‘Monuments, Mobilization and Social Organization in Neolithic Wessex’. The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory, Duckworth, 1973, pp. 539–58.

Renfrew, Colin, DeMarrais, Elizabeth, et al. Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2004.

Renfrew, Colin, Cunliffe, Barry W., et al. Science and Stonehenge. Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 1997.

Renfrew, Colin and Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects. The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory. Duckworth, 1973.

Review by: Lewis R. Binford. American Antiquity. Vol. 53, no. No. 4, pp. 875–76.

Richards, Julian C., et al. The Stonehenge Environs Project. Historical Buildings & Monuments Commission for England, 1990, https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archiveDS/archiveDownload?t=arch-1416-1/dissemination/pdf/9781848022096_ALL_72.pdf.

Richards, Julian C. and English Heritage. English Heritage Book of Stonehenge. B. T. Batsford Ltd./ English Heritage, 1991.

Richerson, Peter J. and Boyd, Robert. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. University of Chicago Press, 2005.

Richerson, Peter J., and Robert Boyd. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. University of Chicago Press, 2005.

Robb, J. E. ‘The Archaeology of Symbols’. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 27, 1998, pp. 329–46, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.329.

Robb, John E., and Marcia-Anne Dobres. ‘Agency in Archaeology: Paradigm or Platitude?’ Agency in Archaeology, Routledge, 2000, pp. 3–17.

Robb, John, and Timothy R. Pauketat. Big Histories, Human Lives: Tackling Problems of Scale in Archaeology. School for Advanced Research Press, 2013.

Robert C. Dunnell. ‘The Harvey Lecture Series. Science, Social Science, and Common Sense: The Agonizing Dilemma of Modern Archaeology’. Journal of Anthropological Research, vol. 38, no. 1, 1982, pp. 1–25.

Rosen, Ralph Mark and University of Pennsylvania. Time and Temporality in the Ancient World. University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, 2004.

Roskams, Steve. ‘Future Prospects’. Excavation, Cambridge manuals in archaeology, Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 267–90.

Ross, Jennifer C. and Steadman, Sharon R. Agency and Identity in the Ancient Near East: New Paths Forward. Equinox, 2010.

Rowley-Conwy, P., et al. Hunter-Gatherers: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Saitta, Dean J. The Archaeology of Collective Action. University Press of Florida, 2007.

Scarre, Geoffrey, and Robin Coningham. Appropriating the Past: Philosophical Perspectives on the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, 2013, https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781139026932.

Schiffer, M. B., and J. M. Skibo. ‘The Explanation of Artifact Variability’. American Antiquity, vol. 62, no. 1, 1997, pp. 27–50.

Schiffer, Michael B. ‘Archaeological Context and Systemic Context’. American Antiquity, vol. 37, no. 2, Apr. 1972, pp. 156–65, https://doi.org/10.2307/278203.

Schiffer, Michael B. Behavioral Archaeology. Academic Press, 1976.

———. Behavioral Archaeology: First Principles. University of Utah Press, 1995.

———. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. University of New Mexico Press, 1987.

Schiffer, Michael B. ‘Is There a “Pompeii Premise” in Archaeology?’ Journal of Anthropological Research, vol. 41, no. 1, 1985, pp. 18–41.

Schlanger , N. ‘Mindful Technology: Unleashing the Chaine Operatoire for an Archaeology of Mind’. The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology, New directions in archaeology, Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 143–51.

Schnapp, A. ‘Between Antiquarians and Archaeologists - Continuities and Ruptures’. Antiquity, vol. 76, no. 291, 2002, pp. 134–40.

Shanks, Michael. ‘Post-Processual Archaeology and After’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories, AltaMira Press, 2008, pp. 133–44.

———. ‘Post-Processual Archaeology and After’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories, AltaMira Press, 2008, pp. 133–44, http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780759113602.

Shanks, Michael, and Ian Hodder. ‘Processual, Postprocessual and Interpretive Archaeologies’. Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past, Routledge, 1994, pp. 3–29.

Shanks, Michael, and R. H. McGuire. ‘The Craft of Archaeology’. American Antiquity, vol. 61, no. 1, 1996, pp. 75–88.

Shanks, Michael, and Christopher Tilley. ‘Abstract and Substantial Time’. Archaeological Review From Cambridge, vol. 6, no. 1, 1987, pp. 32–41, https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/api/core/bitstreams/95e1b53d-9f6e-483c-9a13-32b905583f7c/content.

———. ‘Comments on Archaeology into the 1990s’. Norwegian Archaeological Review, vol. 22, no. 1, 1989, pp. 12–54, https://www-tandfonline-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/toc/sarc20/22/1?nav=tocList.

Shanks, Michael, and Christopher Y Tilley. ‘Archaeology and the Politics of Theory’. Social Theory and Archaeology, Polity in association with Blackwell, 1987, pp. 186–208.

Shanks, Michael, and Christopher Y. Tilley. ‘Chapter 3: Facts and Values in Archaeology’. Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice, 2nd ed, Routledge, 1992, pp. 46–67.

Shanks, Michael and Tilley, Christopher Y. Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed, Routledge, 1992.

Shanks, Michael, and Christopher Y. Tilley. ‘The Individual and the Social’. Social Theory and Archaeology, Polity in association with Blackwell, 1987, pp. 61–78.

Shennan, S. ‘Descent with Modification and the Archaeological Record’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 366, no. 1567, Apr. 2011, pp. 1070–79, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0380.

Shennan, S. J. . ‘An Evolutionary Perspective on the Goals of Archaeology’. Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue, Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, Left Coast, 2011, pp. 325–44.

Shennan, S. J. ‘Introduction: Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity’. Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity, One world archaeology, Routledge, 1994, pp. 1–32.

Shennan, Stephen. ‘Evolution in Archaeology’. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 37, no. 1, Oct. 2008, pp. 75–91, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085153.

Shennan, Stephen. Genes, Memes and Human History: Darwinian Archaeology and Cultural Evolution. Thames & Hudson, 2002.

———. Genes, Memes and Human History: Darwinian Archaeology and Cultural Evolution. Thames & Hudson, 2002.

———. Pattern and Process in Cultural Evolution. University of California Press, 2009.

Shott, Michael J. ‘Status and Role of Formation Theory in Contemporary Archaeological Practice’. Journal of Archaeological Research, vol. 6, no. 4, 1998, pp. 299–329.

Sigault, F. ‘Technology’. Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology, [New ed.], Routledge world reference, Routledge, 2002, pp. 420–59, https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490.

SILLAR, B., and M. S. TITE. ‘THE CHALLENGE OF ‘TECHNOLOGICAL CHOICES’FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE APPROACHES IN ARCHAEOLOGY’. Archaeometry, vol. 42, no. 1, Feb. 2000, pp. 2–20, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x.

Sillar, Bill. ‘The Social Agency of Things? Animism and Materiality in the Andes’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 19, no. 03, Oct. 2009, pp. 367–77, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774309000559.

Sinclair, A. ‘Constellations of Knowledge: Human Agency and Material Affordance in Lithic Technology’. Agency in Archaeology, Routledge, 2000, pp. 196–212.

Smith, Laurajane. Archaeological Theory and the Politics of Cultural Heritage. Routledge, 2004.

———. Archaeological Theory and the Politics of Cultural Heritage. Routledge, 2004.

Smith, Stuart Tyson. Wretched Kush: Ethnic Identities and Boudaries in Egypt’s Nubian Empire. Routledge, 2003.

Sofaer, Joanna R. The Body as Material Culture: A Theoretical Osteoarchaeology. Cambridge University Press, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816666.

Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig. Gender Archaeology. Polity Press, 2000, https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=575200&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451.

Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig. ‘Reading Dress: The Construction of Social Categories and Identities in Bronze Age Europe’. Journal of European Archaeology, vol. 5, no. 1, 1997, pp. 93–114, https://doi.org/10.1179/096576697800703656.

Spaulding, A. C. ‘Statistical Techniques for the Discovery of Artifact Types’. American Antiquity, vol. 18, no. 4, 1953, pp. 305–13.

Spector, J. ‘What This Awl Means: Towards a Feminist Archaeology’. Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Social archaeology, Blackwell, 1991, pp. 388–406.

Spriggs, M. ‘Ethnographic Parallels and the Denial of History’. World Archaeology, vol. 40, no. 4, 2008, pp. 538–52, https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240802453161.

Stark, Miriam T. The Archaeology of Social Boundaries. Smithsonian Institution Press, 1998.

Steven Mithen. ‘Understanding Mind and Culture: Evolutionary Psychology or Social Anthropology?’ Anthropology Today, vol. 11, no. 6, 1995, pp. 3–7, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2783517?origin=crossref.

Stottman, M. Jay. Archaeologists as Activists: Can Archaeologists Change the World? University of Alabama Press, 2010.

Strauss, Claudia. ‘Blaming for Columbine’. Current Anthropology, vol. 48, no. 6, Dec. 2007, pp. 807–32, https://doi.org/10.1086/520975.

Tarlow, Sarah, and Liv Nilsson Stutz. ‘Can an Archaeologist Be a Public Intellectual?’ Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 20, no. 01, June 2013, pp. 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203813000032.

Tarlow, Sarah and West, Susie. The Familiar Past?: Archaeologies of Later Historical Britain. Routledge, 1999.

Taylor, T. ‘Materiality’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories, AltaMira Press, 2008, pp. 297–320, https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1.

Taylor, Walter W. ‘Chapter 6’. A Study of Archaeology, Memoir series of the American Anthropological Association, American Anthropological Association, 1948.

———. ‘Chapter 6’. A Study of Archaeology, Memoir series of the American Anthropological Association, American Anthropological Association, 1948.

———. ‘Old Wine and New Skins: A Contemporary Parable’. Contemporary Archaeology: A Guide to Theory and Contributions, Feffer & Simons, 1972, pp. 28–33.

Thomas, David Hurst. Skull Wars: Kennewick Man, Archaeology, and the Battle for Native American Identity. Basic Books, 2000.

Thomas, J. ‘Archaeologies of Place and Landscape’. Archaeological Theory Today, Rev. and Updated ed, Polity, 2012, pp. 165–86.

———. ‘Culture and Identity’. Companion Encyclopedia of Archaeology, Routledge, 1999, pp. 431–69.

———. ‘Culture and Identity’. Companion Encyclopedia of Archaeology, Routledge, 1999, pp. 431–69.

———. ‘Where Are We Now? Archaeological Theory in the 1990s’. Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective, Routledge, 1994, pp. 343–62.

———. ‘Where Are We Now? Archaeological Theory in the 1990s’. Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective, Routledge, 1994, pp. 343–62.

Thomas, J. S. ‘The Politics of Vision and the Archaeologies of Landscape’. Landscape: Politics and Perspectives, Explorations in anthropology, Berg, 1993, pp. 19–48.

Thomas, Julian. Archaeology and Modernity. Routledge, 2004.

Thomas, Julian. ‘Chapter 6’. Archaeology and Modernity, Routledge, 2004.

———. ‘Humanism and the Individual: Chapter 6’. Archaeology and Modernity, Routledge, 2004, pp. 119–48.

Thomas, Julian, et al. Overcoming the Modern Invention of Material Culture: Proceedings of the TAG Session, Exeter 2006. ADECAP, 2007.

———. Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretative Archaeology. Routledge, 1996.

———. Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretative Archaeology. Routledge, 1996.

Thomas, Julian and David, Bruno. Handbook of Landscape Archaeology. Left Coast Press, 2008, https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1.

Tilley, C. ‘Interpreting Material Culture’. The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression, One world archaeology, Routledge, 1989, pp. 185–94.

Tilley, Christopher. ‘Excavation as Theatre’. Antiquity, vol. 63, no. 239, 1989, pp. 275–80.

———. ‘Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, Oct. 2004, pp. 185–203, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774304000125.

———. ‘Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, Oct. 2004, pp. 185–203, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774304000125.

Tilley, Christopher, and Wayne Bennett. ‘An Archaeology of Super-Natural Places: The Case of West Penwith’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 7, no. 2, 2001, pp. 335–62.

Tilley, Christopher Y. . ‘Archaeology as Socio-Political Action in the Present’. Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology: Essays in the Philosophy, History and Socio-Politics of Archaeology, New directions in archaeology, Cambridge University Press, 1989, pp. 104–16.

Tilley, Christopher Y. ‘Ideology and the Legitimation of Power in the Middle Neolithic of Southern Sweden’. Ideology, Power and Prehistory, New directions in archaeology, Cambridge University Press, 1984, pp. 111–45, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511897443.

Tilley, Christopher Y. Interpretative Archaeology. Berg, 1993, http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474214995.

Tilley, Christopher Y. Metaphor and Material Culture. Blackwell Publishers, 1999.

Tilley, Christopher Y . ‘Phenomenological Approaches to Landscape Archaeology’. Handbook of Landscape Archaeology, World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology, Left Coast Press, 2008, pp. 271–76, https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1.

Tilley, Christopher Y. . ‘Space, Place, Landscape and Perception: Phenomenological Perspectives’. A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths, and Monuments, Explorations in anthropology, Berg, 1994, pp. 7–34.

Tilley, Christopher Y. ‘The Powers of Rocks: Topography and Monument Construction on Bodmin Moor’. World Archaeology, vol. 28, no. 2, 1996, pp. 161–76.

Tim Ingold. ‘The Temporality of the Landscape’. World Archaeology, vol. 25, no. 2, 1993, pp. 152–74, http://www.jstor.org/stable/124811.

Treherne, P. ‘The Warrior’s Beauty: The Masculine Body and Self-Identity in Bronze Age Europe’. Journal of European Archaeology: Journal of the European Association of Archaeologists [Aldershot, Great Britain], vol. 3, no. 1, 1995, pp. 105–44.

Trigger, B G. ‘Archaeology at the Crossroads: What’s New?’ Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 13, no. 1, Oct. 1984, pp. 275–300, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.001423.

Trigger, Bruce G. A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed, Cambridge University Press, 2006, https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511813016.

———. A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed, Cambridge University Press, 2006, https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511813016.

Trigger, Bruce G. . ‘Aims in Prehistoric Archaeology’. Antiquity, vol. 44, no. 173, 1970, pp. 26–37.

———. ‘Alternative Archaeologies: Nationalist, Colonialist, Imperialist’. Man, vol. 19, no. 3, 1984, pp. 355–70.

Trigger, Bruce G. ‘Archaeology and the Image of the American Indian’. American Antiquity, vol. 45, no. 4, 1980, pp. 662–76.

Trigger, Bruce G. . ‘Chapter 7’. A History of Archaeological Thought, 2nd ed, Cambridge University Press, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016.

———. ‘Chapter 8: Processualism and Post-Processualism’. A History of Archaeological Thought, 2nd ed, Cambridge University Press, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016.

———. ‘Chapter 9 and 10’. A History of Archaeological Thought, 2nd ed, Cambridge University Press, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016.

———. ‘Culture-Historical Archaeology’. A History of Archaeological Thought, 2nd ed, Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 211–313.

———. ‘Current Trends in American Archaeology’. Time and Traditions: Essays in Archaeological Interpretation, Edinburgh University Press, 1978, pp. 2–18.

———. ‘Distinguished Lecture in Archaeology: Constraint and Freedom - A New Synthesis for Archaeological Explanation’. American Anthropologist, vol. 93, no. 3, 1991, pp. 551–69.

———. ‘Expanding Middle-Range Theory’. Antiquity, vol. 69, no. 264, 1995, pp. 449–58.

Trigger, Bruce G. ‘Hyper-Relativism, Responsibility and the Social Sciences’. Artifacts & Ideas: Essays in Archaeology, Transaction, 2003, pp. 113–31.

———. ‘Post‐processual Developments in Anglo‐American Archaeology’. Norwegian Archaeological Review, vol. 24, no. 2, Jan. 1991, pp. 65–76.

Tringham, R. ‘Engendered Places in Prehistory’. Interpretive Archaeology: A Reader, Leicester University Press, 2000, pp. 329–57.

Ucko, Peter J., and Robert Layton. ‘Introduction: Gazing on the Landscape and Encountering the Environment’. The Archaeology and Anthropology of Landscape: Shaping Your Landscape, One world archaeology, Routledge, 1999, pp. 1–20.

Ucko, Peter J. and Theoretical Archaeology Group. Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. Routledge, 1994.

Urban, Patricia A. and Schortman, Edward M. Archaeological Theory in Practice. Left Coast Press, 2012.

van der Leeuw, S. ‘Dust to Dust: A Transformational View of the Ceramic Cycle’. The Many Dimensions of Pottery: Ceramics in Archaeology and Anthropology, Cingula, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1984, pp. 709–33.

Van Dyke, Ruth and Alcock, Susan E. Archaeologies of Memory. Blackwell, 2003.

VanPool, C. S., and T. L. VanPool. ‘The Scientific Nature of Post-Processualism’. American Antiquity, vol. 64, no. 1, 1999, pp. 33–53.

VanPool, T. L., and C. S. VanPool. ‘Postprocessualism and the Nature of Science: A Response to Comments by Hutson and Arnold and Wilkens’. American Antiquity, vol. 66, no. 2, 2001, pp. 367–75.

VanPool, Todd L., and Christine S. VanPool. ‘Agency and Evolution: The Role of Intended and Unintended Consequences of Action’. Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory, Foundations of archaeological inquiry, University of Utah Press, 2003, pp. 89–113.

VanPool, Todd L. and VanPool, Christine S. Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory. University of Utah Press, 2003.

Wagstaff, J. Malcolm. Landscape and Culture: Geographical and Archaeological Perspectives. Basil Blackwell, 1987.

Watson, P. J. ‘Processualism and After’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories, AltaMira Press, 2008, pp. 29–38.

Watts, Christopher M. Relational Archaeologies: Humans, Animals, Things. Routledge, 2013.

Webmoor, Timothy, and Christopher L. Witmore. ‘Things Are Us! A Commentary on Human/Things Relations under the Banner of a “Social” Archaeology’. Norwegian Archaeological Review, vol. 41, no. 1, June 2008, pp. 53–70, https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650701698423.

Webster, G. ‘Culture History: A Culture-Historical Approach’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories, AltaMira Press, 2008, pp. 11–27, https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1.

Wheatley, D. ‘Cumulative Viewshed Analysis: A GIS-Based Method for Investigating Inter-Visibility and Its Archaeological Implication’. Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor & Francis, 1995, pp. 171–86.

Wheeler, Robert Eric Mortimer. Archaeology from the Earth. Clarendon Press, 1954, https://archive.org/details/in.gov.ignca.1711.

Whitehouse, R. ‘Cultural and Biological Approaches to the Body in Archaeology: Can They Be Reconciled?" ’. Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue, Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, Left Coast, 2011, pp. 227–44.

Whitehouse, Ruth. ‘Feminism and Archaeology: An Awkward Relationship’. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, vol. 9, 1998, pp. 1–7.

Whitley, James. ‘Homer’s Entangled Objects: Narrative, Agency and Personhood In and Out of Iron Age Texts’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 23, no. 03, Oct. 2013, pp. 395–416, https://doi.org/10.1017/S095977431300053X.

Whittle, Alasdair, et al. ‘The Timing and Tempo of Change: Examples from the Fourth Millennium Cal. BC in Southern England’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 18, no. 01, 2008, pp. 65–70, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774308000061.

Wiessner, P. ‘Style and Changing Relations between the Individual and Society’. The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression, One world archaeology, Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic, 1989, pp. 56–63.

Wilkinson, Darryl. ‘The Emperor’s New Body: Personhood, Ontology and the Inka Sovereign’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 23, no. 03, Oct. 2013, pp. 417–32, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774313000541.

Wilmott, T. ‘Collapse Theory and the End of Birdoswald’. Theoretical Roman Archaeology: Second Conference Proceedings, Worldwide archaeology series, Avebury, 1995, pp. 59–69.

Wilmott, Tony and English Heritage. Hadrian’s Wall: Archaeological Research by English Heritage 1976-2000. English Heritage, 2009, https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/hadrians-wall/.

Winterhalder, Bruce, et al. ‘Ideal Free Settlement of California’s Northern Channel Islands’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 29, no. 4, Dec. 2010, pp. 469–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2010.07.001.

Witcher, R., et al. ‘Archaeologies of Landscape: Excavating the Materialities of Hadrian’s Wall’. Journal of Material Culture, vol. 15, no. 1, Mar. 2010, pp. 105–28, https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183510355228.

———. ‘The Fabulous Tales of the Common People, Part 1: Representing Hadrian’s Wall’. Public Archaeology, vol. 9, no. 3, 2010, pp. 126–52, https://doi.org/10.1179/146551810X12822101587138.

Wobst, H.M. ‘Style in Archaeology or Archaeologists in Style’. Material Meanings: Critical Approaches to the Interpretation of Material Culture, Foundations of archaeological inquiry, University of Utah Press, 1999, pp. 118–32.

Wobst, H. M. ‘Stylistic Behavior Ad Information Exchange’. For the Director: Research Essays in Honor of James B. Griffin, Anthropological papers, Museum of Anthropology. University of Michigan, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, 1977, pp. 317–42, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11395371.

Wylie, A. ‘On “Heavily Decomposing Red Herrings”. Scientific Method in Archaeology and the Ladening of Evidence with Theory’. Metaarchaeology: Reflections by Archaeologists and Philosophers, Boston studies in the philosophy of science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992, pp. 145–57.

———. ‘The Reaction against Analogy’. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 8, 1985, pp. 63–111.

Wylie, Alison . ‘Alternative Histories. Epistemic Disunity and Political Integrity’. Making Alternative Histories: The Practice of Archaeology and History in Non-Western Settings, School of American Research advanced seminar series, School of American Research Press, 1995, pp. 255–72.

Wylie, Alison. ‘Gender Theory and the Archaeological Record: Why Is There No Archaeology of Gender?’ Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Social archaeology, Blackwell, 1991, pp. 31–54.

———. ‘The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender’. American Antiquity, vol. 57, no. 1, 1992, pp. 15–35.

———. ‘The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender’. American Antiquity, vol. 57, no. 1, 1992, pp. 15–35.

Wylie, Alison . ‘The Interpretive Dilemma’. Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology: Essays in the Philosophy, History and Socio-Politics of Archaeology, New directions in archaeology, Cambridge University Press, 1989, pp. 18–27.

Yates, T. ‘Frameworks for an Archaeology of the Body’. Interpretative Archaeology, Explorations in anthropology, Berg, 1992, pp. 31–72.

Yoffee, Norman and Sherratt, Andrew. Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Zarankin, Andrés, et al. Memories from Darkness: Archaeology of Repression and Resistance in Latin America. Springer, 2009, https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1007/978-1-4419-0679-3.

Zimmerman, Larry J., et al. Ethical Issues in Archaeology. Altamira Press, 2003.