Adam, B. 2002. ‘Perceptions of Time’. Pp. 503–26 in Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. Vol. Routledge world reference. London: Routledge.
Adam, Barbara. 1995. Timewatch: The Social Analysis of Time. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Alex Mesoudi, Andrew Whiten and Kevin N. Laland. 2004. ‘Perspective: Is Human Cultural Evolution Darwinian? Evidence Reviewed from the Perspective of “The Origin of Species”’. Evolution 58(1):1–11.
Alison Wylie. 2007. ‘Doing Archaeology as a Feminist: Introduction’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 14(3):209–16.
Andersson, Claes. 2011. ‘Paleolithic Punctuations and Equilibria: Did Retention Rather Than Invention Limit Technological Evolution?’ PaleoAnthropology 243–59.
Andrén, Anders and Crozier, Alan. 1998. Between Artifacts and Texts: Historical Archaeology in Global Perspective. Vol. Contributions to global historical archaeology. London: Plenum Press.
Andrews, G., John C. Barrett, and John S. C. Lewis. 2000. ‘Interpretation Not Record: The Practice of Archaeology’. Antiquity 74(285):525–30.
Arnold, B. 1990. ‘The Past as Propaganda: Totalitarian Archaeology in Nazi Germany’. Antiquity 64(244):464–78.
Arnold, Dean E. 1985. ‘Chapters 5, 8 and 9’. in Ceramic theory and cultural process. Vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arnold III, Philip J., and Brian S. Wilkens. 2001. ‘On the VanPools’ “scientific” Post-Processualism’. American Antiquity 66(2):361–66.
Arnold, P. 2003. ‘Back to Basics: The Middle-Range Program as Pragmatic Archaeology’. Pp. 55–66 in Essential tensions in archaeological method and theory. Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Ashmore, Wendy, and Arthur Bernard Knapp. 1999. ‘Archaeological Landscapes: Constructed, Conceptualised, Ideational’. Pp. 1–30 in Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. Vol. Social archaeology. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers.
Atkinson, R. J. C. 1960. Stonehenge. Vol. A pelican book. Harmondsworth: Penquin Books in association with Hamish Hamilton.
Aunger, Robert. 2000. Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bailey, Geoff. 2007. ‘Time Perspectives, Palimpsests and the Archaeology of Time’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 26(2):198–223. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2006.08.002.
Bamforth, D. B. 2002. ‘Evidence and Metaphor in Evolutionary Archaeology’. American Antiquity 67(3):435–52.
Bamforth, D. B. 2003. ‘What Is Archaeology? (Or Confusion, Sound and Fury, Signifying....)’. American Antiquity 68(3):581–84.
Banks, Iain, O’Sullivan, Jerry, Atkinson, John A., and Scottish Archaeological Forum. 1996. Nationalism and Archaeology: Scottish Archaeological Forum. Glasgow: Cruithne Press.
Barrett , J. C. 2012. ‘Agency, the Duality of Structure and the Problem of the Archaeological Record’. Pp. 141–64 in Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: Polity.
Barrett, John. 1999. ‘The Mythical Landscapes of the British Iron Age’. Pp. 253–65 in Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. Vol. Social archaeology. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers.
Barrett, John C. 1993a. Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Vol. Social archaeology. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.
Barrett, John C. 1993b. Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Barrett, John C. 2014. ‘The Material Constitution of Humanness’. Archaeological Dialogues 21(01):65–74. doi: 10.1017/S1380203814000105.
Bender, Barbara. 1992a. ‘Theorising Landscapes, and the Prehistoric Landscape of Stonehenge’. Man 27(4):735–55.
Bender, Barbara. 1992b. ‘Theorising Landscapes, and the Prehistoric Landscape of Stonehenge’. Man 27(4):735–55.
Bender, Barbara and Aitken, Paul. 1998. Stonehenge: Making Space. Vol. Materializing culture. Oxford: Berg.
Bender, Barbara, Sue Hamilton, and Christopher Tilley. 1997. ‘Leskernick: Stone Worlds; Alternative Narratives; Nested Landscapes.’ Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 63:147–78. doi: 10.1017/S0079497X00002413.
Bender, Barbara, Christopher Y. Tilley, Ed Anderson, and Sue Hamilton. 2007a. ‘Chapters 1 and 3’. in Stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology. Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press.
Bender, Barbara, Christopher Y. Tilley, Ed Anderson, and Sue Hamilton. 2007b. ‘Chapters 1 and 3’. in Stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology. Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press.
Bentley , A. 2011. ‘“Style versus Function” 30 Years On’. Pp. 83–104 in Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast.
Bentley, A., and H. D. G. Maschner. 2008. ‘Complexity Theory’. Pp. 245–70 in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Bentley, R., and Maschner Alexander. 2008. ‘Introduction on Archaeological Theories’. in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Bentley, R. Alexander, Maschner, Herbert D. G., and Chippindale, Christopher. 2008. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. Lanham, Md: AltaMira Press.
Bentley, R. Alexander, Herbert D. G. Maschner, and Christopher Chippindale. 2008. ‘R. McGuire’. Pp. 73–93 in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, Md: AltaMira Press.
Berggren, A., and Ian Hodder. 2003. ‘Social Practice, Method and Some Problems of Field Archaeology’. American Antiquity 68(3):421–34.
Bernbeck, R., and S. Pollock. 2004. ‘The Political Economy of Archaeological Practice and the Production of Heritage in the Middle East’. Pp. 335–52 in A companion to social archaeology. Vol. Social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd.
Bettinger, Robert L. 1991. Hunter-Gatherers: Archaeological and Evolutionary Theory. Vol. Interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology. New York: Plenum Press.
Binford, Lewis R. 1962a. ‘Archaeology as Anthropology’. American Antiquity 28(2):217–25.
Binford, Lewis R. 1962b. ‘Archaeology as Anthropology’. American Antiquity 28(2):217–25.
Binford, Lewis R. 1964a. ‘A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design’. American Antiquity 29(4):425–41.
Binford, Lewis R. 1964b. ‘A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design’. American Antiquity 29(4):425–41.
Binford, Lewis R. 1968. ‘Archaeological Perspectives’. Pp. 5–32 in New perspectives in archeology. Chicago: Aldine.
Binford, Lewis R. 1977. ‘General Introduction’. Pp. 1–10 in For theory building in archaeology: essays on faunal remains, aquatic resources, spatial analysis and systemic modeling. Vol. Studies in archeology. London: Academic Press.
Binford, Lewis R. 1981a. ‘Behavioural Archaeological and the “Pompeii Premise” ’. Journal of Anthropological Research 37(3):195–208.
Binford, Lewis R. 1981b. ‘Relics to Artifacts and Monuments to Assemblages: Changing Conceptual Frameworks’. Pp. 3–20 in Bones: ancient men and modern myths. Vol. Studies in archaeology. London: Academic Press.
Binford, Lewis R. 1983. ‘Interassemblage Variability: The Mousterian and the Functional Argument’. Pp. 131–53 in Working at archaeology. Vol. Studies in archeology. New York: Academic Press.
Binford, Lewis Roberts. 2001. Constructing Frames of Reference: An Analytical Method for Archaeological Theory Building Using Hunter-Gatherer and Environmental Data Sets. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bintliff, J. L. 1991. The Annales School and Archaeology. London: Leicester University Press.
Bintliff, J. L. and Pearce, Mark. 2011. The Death of Archaeological Theory? Oakville: Oxbow Books.
Boone, James L., and Eric Alden Smith. 1998. ‘Is It Evolution Yet? A Critique of Evolutionary Archaeology’. Current Anthropology 39(S1):S141–74. doi: 10.1086/204693.
Borić, Dušan. 2010. Archaeology and Memory. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
Boyd, Robert and Richerson, Peter J. 1985. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bradley, Richard. 1998. The Significance of Monuments: On the Shaping of Human Experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe. London: Routledge.
Bradley, Richard. 2002. The Past in Prehistoric Societies. London: Routledge.
Bruce G. Trigger. 1993. ‘Marxism in Contemporary Western Archaeology’. Archaeological Method and Theory 5:159–200.
Bruce G. Trigger. 1998. ‘Archaeology and Epistemology: Dialoguing across the Darwinian Chasm’. American Journal of Archaeology 102(1):1–34.
Brück, Joanna. 2001. ‘Monuments, Power and Personhood in the British Neolithic’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7(4):649–67. doi: 10.1111/1467-9655.00082.
Brück, Joanna. 2005a. ‘Experiencing the Past? The Development of a Phenomenological Archaeology in British Prehistory’. Archaeological Dialogues 12(01):45–72. doi: 10.1017/S1380203805001583.
Brück, Joanna. 2005b. ‘Experiencing the Past? The Development of a Phenomenological Archaeology in British Prehistory’. Archaeological Dialogues 12(1):45–72. doi: 10.1017/S1380203805001583.
Brumfiel, E. M. 2000. ‘On the Archaeology of Choice: Agency Studies as a Research Strategem’. Pp. 249–55 in Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge.
Buchli, Victor, Lucas, Gavin, and Cox, Margaret. 2001. Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past. London: Routledge.
Butzer, Karl W. 1982. Archaeology as Human Ecology: Method and Theory for a Contextual Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carr, Lydia. 2012. Tessa Verney Wheeler: Women and Archaeology before World War Two. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carrithers, Michael, Steven Collins, and Steven Lukes, eds. 1985. The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Casella, Eleanor Conlin and Fowler, Chris. 2005. The Archaeology of Plural and Changing Identities: Beyond Identification. London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Chadwick, A. 2003. ‘Post-Processualism, Professionalization and Archaeological Methodologies. Towards Reflexive and Radical Practice’. Archaeological Dialogues 10(1):97–117. doi: 10.1017/S1380203803001107.
Childe, V. Gordon. 1929. ‘Preface and Chapter 1’. Pp. v-xii-1–7 in The Danube in prehistory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Childe, V. Gordon. 1956. ‘What Happens in Prehistory?’ Pp. 135–58 in Piecing together the past: the interpretation of archaeological data. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Chilton, Elizabeth S. 1999. Material Meanings: Critical Approaches to the Interpretation of Material Culture. Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Chippindale, C. 1993. ‘Ambition, Deference, Discrepancy, Comsumption: The Intellectual Background to a Post-Processual Archaeology’. Pp. 27–36 in Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda?. Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chippindale, Christopher. 1990. Who Owns Stonehenge? London: Batsford.
Chippindale, Christopher. 2004. Stonehenge Complete. New and expanded [3rd] ed. [London]: Thames & Hudson.
Chris Gosden. 2005. ‘What Do Objects Want?’ Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 12(3):193–211.
Clark, Grahame. 1960. Archaeology and Society. 3rd ed. London: Methuen.
Clark, Grahame. 1989. ‘Economic Approach to Prehistory’. Pp. 149–68 in Economic prehistory: papers on archaeology. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Cambridge University Press.
Clarke, D. L. 1973a. ‘Archaeology: The Loss of Innocence’. Antiquity 47(185):6–18.
Clarke, D. L. 1973b. ‘Archaeology: The Loss of Innocence’. Antiquity 47(185):6–18.
Clarke, David L. . 1973. ‘Archaeology: The Loss of Innocence’. Antiquity 47(185):6–18.
Clarke, David L. and Chapman, Bob. 1978. Analytical Archaeology. 2nd ed. London: Methuen.
Cleal, Rosamund, Walker, K. E., Montague, R., and English Heritage. 1995. Stonehenge in Its Landscape: Twentieth-Century Excavations. Vol. Archaeological report / English Heritage. London: English Heritage.
Cochrane, E. E. 2001. ‘Style, Function and Systematic Empiricism: The Conflation of Process and Pattern’. Pp. 183–202 in Style and function: conceptual issues in evolutionary archaeology. London: Bergin & Garvey.
Cochrane, Ethan E. and Gardner, Andrew. 2011a. Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast.
Cochrane, Ethan E. and Gardner, Andrew. 2011b. Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast.
Collis, John. 2001. Digging up the Past: An Introduction to Archaeological Excavation. Stroud: Sutton.
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C. 2012. ‘Archaeology and Indigenous Collaboration’. Pp. 267–91 in Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: Polity.
Conkey, Margaret W., and Joan M. Gero. 1997. ‘Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology’. Annual Review of Anthropology 26(1):411–37. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.411.
Conkey, Margaret W., and J. D. Spector. 1984. ‘Archaeology and the Study of Gender’. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 7:1–38.
Conolly, J. 2000. ‘Catalhoyuk and the Archaeological Object’. Pp. 51–56 in Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük : by members of the Çatalhöyük team. Vol. McDonald Institute monographs. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Cooper, Nicholas, Webster, Jane, and University of Leicester. 1996. Roman Imperialism: Post-Colonial Perspectives. Vol. Leicester archaeology monographs. Leicester: School of Archaeological Studies, University of Leicester.
Cornell, P., and F. Fahlander. 2002. ‘Microarchaeology, Materiality and Social Practice’. Current Swedish Archaeology 10:21–38.
Courbin, Paul. 1988. What Is Archaeology?: An Essay on the Nature of Archaeological Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Coward, Fiona, Stephen Shennan, Sue Colledge, James Conolly, and Mark Collard. 2008. ‘The Spread of Neolithic Plant Economies from the Near East to Northwest Europe: A Phylogenetic Analysis’. Journal of Archaeological Science 35(1):42–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2007.02.022.
Cowgill, G. L. 1993. ‘Distinguished Lecture in Archaeology: Beyond Criticizing New Archaeology’. American Anthropologist, New Series 95(3):551–73.
Currie, T. E., and R. Mace. 2011. ‘Mode and Tempo in the Evolution of Socio-Political Organization: Reconciling “Darwinian” and “Spencerian” Evolutionary Approaches in Anthropology’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366(1567):1108–17. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0318.
David, Bruno, and Julian Thomas. 2008. ‘Landscape Archaeology: Introduction’. Pp. 27–43 in Handbook of landscape archaeology. Vol. World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press.
David J. Meltzer. 1979. ‘Paradigms and the Nature of Change in American Archaeology’. American Antiquity 44(4):644–57.
Díaz-Andreu García, Margarita. 2005. The Archaeology of Identity: Approaches to Gender, Age, Status, Ethnicity and Religion. London: Routledge.
Díaz-Andreu García, Margarita. 2007. A World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology: Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Diaz-Andreu, M. 2004. ‘Britain and the Other: The Archaeology of Imperialism’. Pp. 227–41 in History, nationhood, and the question of Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dobres, Marcia-Anne. 2000. ‘Social Agency and Practice: The Heart and Soul of Technology’. Pp. 127–63 in Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Dobres, Marcia-Anne. 2000a. Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Dobres, Marcia-Anne. 2000b. Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Dobres, Marcia-Anne, and C. R. Hoffman. 1994. ‘Social Agency and the Dynamics of Prehistoric Technology’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1(3):211–58.
Dobres, Marcia-Anne, and John E. Robb. 2000. ‘Agency in Archaeology: Paradigm or Platitude?’ Pp. 3–17 in Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge.
Dornan, J. L. 2002. ‘Agency and Archaeology: Past, Present and Future Directions’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 9(4):303–29. doi: 10.1023/A:1021318432161.
Dowson, T.A. . 2000. ‘Homosexuality, Queer Theory and Archaeology’. Pp. 283–89 in Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: Leicester University Press.
Dowson, T.A. 2000. ‘Homosexuality, Queer Theory and Archaeology’. Pp. 283–89 in Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: Leicester University Press.
Dunnell, R. C. 1978. ‘Style and Function: A Fundamental Dichotomy’. American Antiquity 43(2):192–202.
Dunnell, R. C. 1986. ‘Five Decades of American Archaeology’. in American archaeology, past and future: a celebration of the Society for American Archaeology, 1935-1985. London: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Dyson, Stephen L. 2006. In Pursuit of Ancient Pasts: A History of Classical Archaeology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. London: Yale University Press.
Earle et. al., T. K. 1987. ‘Processual Archaeology and the Radical Critique’. Current Anthropology 28(4):501–38.
Edgeworth, Matt. 2003. Acts of Discovery: An Ethnography of Archaeological Practice. Vol. BAR international series. Oxford: Archaeopress.
Edgeworth, Matt. 2006. Ethnographies of Archaeological Practice: Cultural Encounters, Material Transformations. Vol. Worlds of archaeology series. Lanham: Altamira Press.
Engelstad, E. 1991. ‘Images of Power and Contradiction: Feminist Theory and Post-Processual Archaeology’. Antiquity 65(248):502–14.
Englehardt, Joshua. 2013. Agency in Ancient Writing. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
Fagan, Brian M. 2001. Grahame Clark: An Intellectual Biography of an Archaeologist. Boulder, Colo: Westview.
Fagan, Garrett G. 2006. Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public. London: Routledge.
Ferguson, L. 1991. ‘Struggling with Pots in Colonial South Carolina’. Pp. 28–39 in The archaeology of inequality. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fewster, Kathryn J. 2006. ‘The Role of Agency and Material Culture in Remembering and Forgetting: An Ethnoarchaeological Case Study from Central Spain’. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 20(1). doi: 10.1558//jmea.2007.v20i1.89.
Fisher, Peter, Chris Farrelly, Adrian Maddocks, and Clive Ruggles. 1997. ‘Spatial Analysis of Visible Areas from the Bronze Age Cairns of Mull’. Journal of Archaeological Science 24(7):581–92. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1996.0142.
Flannery, Kent V. 1967. ‘Culture History vs. Culture Process: A Debate in American Archaeology’. Scientific American 2(2):119–22.
Flannery, Kent V. 1968. ‘Archaeological Systems Theory and Early Mesoamerica’. Pp. 67–87 in Anthropological archeology in the Americas. Washington, DC: The Anthropological Society of Washington.
Flannery, Kent V. 1982. ‘The Golden Marshalltown: A Parable for the Archeology of the 1980s’. American Anthropologist 84(2):265–78.
Flannery, Kent V. 1999a. ‘Process and Agency in Early State Formation’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 9(1):3–21. doi: 10.1017/S0959774300015183.
Flannery, Kent V. 1999b. ‘Process and Agency in Early State Formation’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 9(1):3–21. doi: 10.1017/S0959774300015183.
Fleming, A. 2006. ‘Post-Processual Landscape Archaeology: A Critique’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 16(3):267–80. doi: 10.1017/S0959774306000163.
Fleming, Andrew. 1999. ‘Phenomenology and the Megaliths of Wales: A Dreaming Too Far?’ Oxford Journal of Archaeology 18(2):119–25. doi: 10.1111/1468-0092.00074.
Fowler, C. 2000. ‘The Individual, the Subject and Archaeological Interpretation: Reading Luce Irigaray and Judith Butler’. Pp. 107–22 in Philosophy and archaeological practice: perspectives for the 21st century. Göteborg: Bricoleur Press.
Fowler, C. 2001. ‘Personhood and Social Relations in the British Neolithic with a Study from the Isle of Man’. Journal of Material Culture 6(2):137–63. doi: 10.1177/135918350100600202.
Fowler, Chris. 2004. The Archaeology of Personhood: An Anthropological Approach. Vol. Themes in archaeology. London: Routledge.
Fowler, D. 2008. ‘Archaeological Ethics in Context and Practice’. Pp. 409–22 in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Frere, S. S. 1988. ‘Roman Britain since Haverfield and Richmond’. History and Archaeology Review 3:31–36.
Funari, Pedro Paulo A., Zarankin, Andrés, and Stovel, Emily. 2005. Global Archaeological Theory: Contextual Voices and Contemporary Thoughts. London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
G. N. Bailey. 1983. ‘Concepts of Time in Quaternary Prehistory’. Annual Review of Anthropology 12:165–92.
Gardner, A. 2003. ‘Seeking a Material Turn: The Artefactuality of the Roman Empire’. Pp. 1–13 in TRAC 2002: proceedings of the twelfth annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference which took place at the University of Kent at Canterbury 5-6 April 2002. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
Gardner, A. 2008. ‘Agency’. Pp. 95–108 in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, Md: AltaMira Press.
Gardner, A. 2011. ‘Action and Structure in Interpretive Archaeologies’. Pp. 63–82 in Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast.
Gardner, A. 2012. ‘Time and Empire in the Roman World’. Journal of Social Archaeology 12(2):145–66. doi: 10.1177/1469605312439971.
Gardner, Andrew. 2007a. An Archaeology of Identity: Soldiers and Society in Late Roman Britain. Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press.
Gardner, Andrew. 2007b. An Archaeology of Identity: Soldiers and Society in Late Roman Britain. Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press.
Gaydarska, B. 2009. ‘A Brief History of TAG’. Antiquity 83(322):1152–62.
Gell, Alfred. 1992. The Anthropology of Time: Cultural Constructions of Temporal Maps and Images. Vol. Explorations in anthropology. Oxford: Berg.
Geller, Pamela L. 2009. ‘Identity and Difference: Complicating Gender in Archaeology’. Annual Review of Anthropology 38(1):65–81. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164414.
Geoff Emberling. 1997. ‘Ethnicity in Complex Societies: Archaeological Perspectives’. Journal of Archaeological Research 5(4):295–344.
Gero, Joan M. 1996. ‘Archaeological Practice and Gendered Encounters with Field Data’. Pp. 251–80 in Gender and archaeology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Gero, Joan M., and Margaret Wright. 1991. ‘Tensions, Pluralities and Engendering Archaeology: An Introduction to Women and Prehistory’. Pp. 3–30 in Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gheorghiu, Dragos, and George Nash. 2013. Place as Material Culture: Objects, Geographies and the Construction of Time. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Pub.
Gilchrist, R. 2004. ‘Archaeology and the Life Course: A Time and Age for Gender’. Pp. 142–60 in A companion to social archaeology. Vol. Social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd.
Gilchrist, Roberta. 1991. ‘Women’s Archaeology? Political Feminism, Gender Theory and Historical Revision’. Antiquity 65(248):495–501.
Glenn R. Storey. 1999. ‘Archaeology and Roman Society: Integrating Textual and Archaeological Data’. Journal of Archaeological Research 7(3):203–48.
Gordon Childe, Vere. 1935. ‘Changing Aims and Methods in Prehistory’. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 1:1–15.
Gosden, C. 2004. ‘The Past and Foreign Countries: Colonial and Post-Colonial Archaeology and Anthropology’. Pp. 161–78 in A companion to social archaeology. Vol. Social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd.
Gosden, C., and Y. Marshall. 1999. ‘The Cultural Biography of Objects’. World Archaeology 31(2):169–78.
Gosden, Chris. 1994. Social Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gosden, Chris. 2012. ‘Postcolonial Archaeology. Issues of Culture, Identity and Knowledge’. Pp. 241–61 in Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: Polity.
Graves-Brown, P. 1996. ‘In Search of the Watchmaker: Attribution of Agency in Natural and Cultural Selection’. Pp. 165–81 in Darwinian archaeologies. Vol. Interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology. London: Plenum Press.
Greene, Kevin. 2010. ‘Chapter 6: Making Sense of the Past’. Pp. 249–312 in Archaeology: an introduction. London: Routledge.
Greene, Kevin and Moore, Tom. 2010. Archaeology: An Introduction. 5th ed. London: Routledge.
Greg Woolf. 2004. ‘The Present State and Future Scope of Roman Archaeology: A Comment’. American Journal of Archaeology 108(3):417–28.
Hales, Shelley and Hodos, Tamar. 2010. Material Culture and Social Identities in the Ancient World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hamilton et al., Sue. 2008. ‘Quarried Away: Thinking about Landscapes of Megalithic Construction on Rapa Nui (Easter Island)’. Pp. 176–86 in Handbook of landscape archaeology. Vol. World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press.
Hamilton, S., R. Whitehouse, K. Brown, P. Combes, E. Herring, and M. S. Thomas. 2006a. ‘Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach’. European Journal of Archaeology 9(1):31–71. doi: 10.1177/1461957107077704.
Hamilton, S., R. Whitehouse, K. Brown, P. Combes, E. Herring, and M. S. Thomas. 2006b. ‘Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach’. European Journal of Archaeology 9(1):31–71. doi: 10.1177/1461957107077704.
Hamilton, Sue. 1999. ‘Lost in Translation? A Comment on the Excavation Report’. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 10:1–8. doi: 10.5334/pia.140.
Hamilton, Sue. 2011. ‘The Ambiguity of Landscape: Discussing Points of Relatedness in Concepts and Methods’. Pp. 263–80 in Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast.
Hamilton, Sue, Ruth Whitehouse, and Katherine I. Wright. 2007. ‘Introduction and Section 1’. Pp. 13–40 in Archaeology and women: ancient & modern issues. Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press.
Hannah, Robert. 2009. Time in Antiquity. Vol. Sciences of antiquity. Abingdon: Routledge.
Harding, Jan. 2005. ‘Rethinking the Great Divide: Long‐Term Structural History and the Temporality of Event’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 38(2):88–101. doi: 10.1080/00293650510032707.
Harris, David R., Childe, V. Gordon, V. Gordon Childe Centennial Conference, University College, London, and Prehistoric Society (London, England). 1994. The Archaeology of V. Gordon Childe: Contemporary Perspectives : Proceedings of the V. Gordon Childe Centennial Conference Held at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 8-9 May 1992 under the Auspices of the Institute of Archaeology and the Prehistoric Society. London: UCL Press.
Hassan, Fekri. 1997. ‘Beyond the Surface: Comments on Hodder’s Reflexive Excavation Methodology’. Antiquity 71(274):1020–25.
Hassan, Fekri A. 1997. ‘Beyond the Surface: Comments on Hodder’s “Reflexive Excavation Methodology”’. Antiquity 71(274):1020–25.
Hastorf, C. 1991. ‘Gender, Space and Food in Prehistory’. Pp. 132–59 in Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hastorf, Christine Ann and Conkey, Margaret Wright. 1989. The Uses of Style in Archaeology. Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hawkes, Christopher. 1954. ‘Wenner-Gren Foundation Supper Conference - Archaeological Theory and Method: Some Suggestiongs from the Old World’. American Anthropologist 56(2):155–68.
Hayden, Brian, and Aubrey Cannon. 1983. ‘Where the Garbage Goes: Refuse Disposal in the Maya Highlands’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2(2):117–63. doi: 10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7.
Hays-Gilpin, K. 2008. ‘Gender’. Pp. 335–49 in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Hegmon, M. 1992. ‘Archaeological Research on Style’. Annual Review of Anthropology 21:517–36. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002505.
Hegmon, M. 2003. ‘Setting Theoretical Egos aside: Issues and Theory in North American Archaeology’. American Antiquity 68(2):213–43.
Henson, Donald. 2012. Doing Archaeology: A Subject Guide for Students. London: Routledge.
Higgs, E. S., and C. Vita-Finzi. 1972. ‘Prehistoric Economies: A Territorial Approach’. Pp. 27–36 in Papers in economic prehistory: studies by members and associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture. London: Cambridge University Press.
Hill, Erica. 1998. ‘Gender-Informed Archaeology: The Priority of Definition, the Use of Analogy, and the Multivariate Approach’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 5(1):99–128. doi: 10.1007/BF02428417.
Hill, J. N., and R. K. Evans. 1972. ‘A Model for Classification and Typology’. Pp. 231–73 in Models in archaeology. London: Methuen.
Hingley, R. 2008. ‘Hadrian’s Wall in Theory: Pursuing New Agendas’. Pp. 25–28 in Understanding Hadrian’s Wall: papers from a conference held at South Shields, 3rd-5th November 2006, to mark the publication of the 14th edition of the Handbook to the Roman Wall. South Shields: Arbeia Society.
Hingley, R. 2010. ‘“The Most Ancient Boundary between England and Scotland”: Genealogies of the Roman Walls’. Classical Receptions Journal 2(1):25–43. doi: 10.1093/crj/clq001.
Hingley, Richard. 2000. ‘Chapters 9 and 10’. in Roman officers and English gentlemen: the imperial origins of Roman archaeology. New York: Routledge.
Hingley, Richard. 2000. Roman Officers and English Gentlemen: The Imperial Origins of Roman Archaeology. New York: Routledge.
Hodder, I. 1982. ‘Theoretical Archaeology: A Reactionary View’. Pp. 92–121 in Symbolic and structural archaeology. Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodder, I. 1989. ‘Post-Modernism, Post-Structuralism and Post-Processual Archaeology’. Pp. 64–78 in The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. Vol. One world archaeology. London: Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic.
Hodder, I. 1992a. ‘Material Practice, Symbolism and Ideology’. Pp. 201–12 in Theory and practice in archaeology. Vol. Material cultures. London: Routledge.
Hodder, I. 1992b. ‘Material Practice, Symbolism and Ideology’. Pp. 201–12 in Theory and practice in archaeology. Vol. Material cultures. London: Routledge.
Hodder, I. 1993. ‘Bridging the Divide: A Commentary on Theoretical Roman Archaeology’. Pp. xiii–xix in Theoretical Roman archaeology: first conference proceedings. Vol. Wordwide archaeology series. Aldershot: Avebury.
Hodder, I. 2003. ‘Chapter 1: The Problem’. Pp. 1–19 in Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodder, I. 2011. ‘Human-Thing Entanglement: Towards an Integrated Archaeological Perspective’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17(1):154–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x.
Hodder, Ian. 1982. Symbols in Action: Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture. Vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodder, Ian. 1985. ‘Postprocessual Archaeology’. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8:1–26.
Hodder, Ian. 1991. ‘Interpretive Archaeology and Its Role’. American Antiquity 56(1):7–18.
Hodder, Ian. 1992. ‘Writing Archaeology: Site Reports in Context’. Pp. 263–74 in Theory and practice in archaeology. Vol. Material cultures. London: Routledge.
Hodder, Ian. 1994. Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past. London: Routledge.
Hodder, Ian. 1997a. ‘Always Momentary, Fluid and Flexible: Towards a Reflexive Excavation Methodology’. Antiquity 71(273):691–700.
Hodder, Ian. 1997b. ‘“Always Momentary, Fluid and Flexible”: Towards a Reflexive Excavation Methodology’. Antiquity 71(273):691–700.
Hodder, Ian. 1998. ‘Whose Rationality? A Response to Fekri Hassan’. Antiquity 72(275):213–17.
Hodder, Ian. 1999. The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hodder, Ian. 1999a. ‘Towards a Reflexive Method’. Pp. 80–104 in The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hodder, Ian. 1999b. ‘Towards a Reflexive Method’. Pp. 80–104 in The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hodder, Ian. 2001. Archaeological Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity.
Hodder, Ian. 2001. ‘Introduction: A Review of Contemporary Theoretical Debate in Archaeology’. Pp. 1–13 in Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: Polity.
Hodder, Ian. 2012a. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hodder, Ian. 2012b. ‘Introduction: Contemporary Theoretical Debate in Archaeology’. Pp. 1–14 in Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: Polity.
Hodder, Ian, and Scott Hutson. 2003. Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. Third edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodder, Ian, Håkan Karlsson, and Bjørnar Olsen. 2008. ‘40 Years of Theoretical Engagement: A Conversation with Ian Hodder’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 41(1):26–42. doi: 10.1080/00293650802181154.
Hoffman, Christopher R. and Dobres, Marcia-Anne. 1999. The Social Dynamics of Technology: Practice, Politics, and World Views. London: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Holdaway, Simon and Wandsnider, LuAnn. 2008. Time in Archaeology: Time Perspectivism Revisited. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Hutson, S. R. 2001. ‘Synergy through Disunity, Science as Social Practice: Comments on VanPool and VanPool’. American Antiquity 66(2):349–60.
Ian Hodder. 1985. ‘Postprocessual Archaeology’. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8:1–26.
Ian Hodder and Mark Hassall. 1971. ‘The Non-Random Spacing of Romano-British Walled Towns’. Man 6(3):391–407.
Ingold, T. 2007. ‘Materials against Materiality’. Archaeological Dialogues 14(1):1–16. doi: 10.1017/S1380203807002127.
Ingold, Tim. 1993. ‘The Temporality of the Landscape’. World Archaeology 25(2):152–74.
James R. Sackett. 1977. ‘The Meaning of Style in Archaeology: A General Model’. American Antiquity 42(3):369–80.
James, S. 1998. ‘Celts, Politics and Motivation in Archaeology’. Antiquity 72(275):200–209.
James, S. 2003. ‘Roman Archaeology: Crisis and Revolution’. Antiquity 77(295):178–84.
James, Simon. 1999. The Atlantic Celts: Ancient People or Modern Invention? London: British Museum Press.
James, Simon. 2002. ‘Writing the Legions: The Development and Future of Roman Military Studies in Britain’. Archaeological Journal 159(1):1–58. doi: 10.1080/00665983.2002.11020514.
James, Simon, Millett, Martin, Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, and Council for British Archaeology. 2001. Britons and Romans: Advancing an Archaeological Agenda. Vol. CBA research report. York: Council for British Archaeology.
Johnson, M. 2006. ‘On the Nature of Theoretical Archaeology and Archaeological Theory’. Archaeological Dialogues 13(2):117–32. doi: 10.1017/S138020380621208X.
Johnson, M. H. 1999. ‘Rethinking Historical Archaeology’. Pp. 23–36 in Historical archaeology: back from the edge. Vol. One world archaeology. New York: Routledge.
Johnson, Matthew. 2010. Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Johnson, Matthew. 2010a. ‘Chapters 6 and 7’. in Archaeological theory: an introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Johnson, Matthew. 2010b. ‘Common Sense Is Not Enough’. Pp. 1–11 in Archaeological theory: an introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Johnson, Matthew H. 1989. ‘Conceptions of Agency in Archaeological Interpretation’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8(2):189–211. doi: 10.1016/0278-4165(89)90024-X.
Jones, Andrew. 2001. Archaeological Theory and Scientific Practice. Vol. Topics in contemporary archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, S. 1997. ‘Chapter 2’. in The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. London: Routledge.
Jones, S. 1997. The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. London: Routledge.
Jones, S. 2000. ‘Discourses of Identity in the Interpretation of the Past’. Pp. 445–57 in Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: Leicester University Press.
Jones, S. 2008. ‘Ethnicity: Theoretical Approaches, Methodological Implications’. Pp. 321–33 in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Joyce, R. 2004. ‘Embodied Subjectivity: Gender, Feminity, Masculinity, Sexuality’. Pp. 82–95 in A companion to social archaeology. Vol. Social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd.
Joyce, R. A. 2004. ‘Unintended Consequences? Monumentality as a Novel Experience in Formative Mesoamerica’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 11(1):5–29.
Joyce, Rosemary A. 2005. ‘Archaeology of the Body’. Annual Review of Anthropology 34(1):139–58. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143729.
Karlin, C., and M. Julien. 1994. ‘Prehistoric Technology: A Cognitive Science?’ Pp. 152–63 in The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karlsson, Håkan. 2001. It’s about Time: The Concept of Time in Archaeology. Göteborg: Bricoleur.
Kent G. Lightfoot, Antoinette Martinez and Ann M. Schiff. 1998. ‘Daily Practice and Material Culture in Pluralistic Social Settings: An Archaeological Study of Culture Change and Persistence from Fort Ross, California’. American Antiquity 63(2):199–222.
Knapp, A. Bernard, and Peter van Dommelen. 2008. ‘Past Practices: Rethinking Individuals and Agents in Archaeology’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18(01):15–34. doi: 10.1017/S0959774308000024.
Knapp, A. Bernard, and Lynn Meskell. 1997. ‘Bodies of Evidence on Prehistoric Cyprus’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 7(02):183–204. doi: 10.1017/S0959774300001931.
Knappet, C. 2012. ‘Materiality’. Pp. 188–207 in Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: Polity.
Knappett, C. 2002. ‘Photographs, Skeuomorphs and Marionettes: Some Thoughts on Mind, Agency and Object’. Journal of Material Culture 7(1):97–117. doi: 10.1177/1359183502007001307.
Knappett, Carl. 2005. Thinking through Material Culture: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Vol. Archaeology, culture, and society. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Knappett, Carl. 2011. An Archaeology of Interaction: Network Perspectives on Material Culture and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knappett, Carl and Malafouris, Lambros. 2008. Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer.
Kohl, Philip L. 1998a. ‘Nationalism and Archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past’. Annual Review of Anthropology 27(1):223–46. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.223.
Kohl, Philip L. 1998b. ‘Nationalism and Archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past’. Annual Review of Anthropology 27(1):223–46. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.223.
Kohl, Philip L., and Clare Fawcett. 1995. ‘Archaeology in the Service of the State: Theoretical Considerations’. Pp. 3–18 in Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kristiansen, K. 2004. ‘Genes versus Agents: A Discussion of the Widening Theoretical Gap in Archaeology’. Archaeological Dialogues 11(2):77–99. doi: 10.1017/S1380203805211509.
Kristiansen, Kristian. 2004. ‘Genes versus Agents. A Discussion of the Widening Theoretical Gap in Archaeology’. Archaeological Dialogues 11(2):77–99. doi: 10.1017/S1380203805211509.
Lake, Mark. 2007. ‘Viewing Space’. World Archaeology 39(1):1–3.
LaMotta, V., and M. Schiffer. 2001. ‘Behavioral Archaeology. Towards a New Synthesis’. in Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: Polity.
LaMotta, V., and M. Schiffer. 2012. ‘Behavioral Archaeology. Towards a New Synthesis’. Pp. 14–64 in Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: Polity.
Layton, R. 2006. ‘Structuralism and Semiotics’. Pp. 29–42 in Handbook of material culture. London: SAGE.
Layton, Robert. 1994. Who Needs the Past?: Indigenous Values and Archaeology. Vol. One world archaeology. London: Routledge.
van der Leeuw, S. 1984. ‘Dust to Dust: A Transformational View of the Ceramic Cycle’. Pp. 709–33 in The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology. Vol. Cingula. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Lemonnier, Pierre. 1986. ‘The Study of Material Culture Today: Toward an Anthropology of Technical Systems’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5(2):147–86. doi: 10.1016/0278-4165(86)90012-7.
Leone et al., M. 1994. ‘Can an African-American Historical Archaeology Be an Alternative Voice?’ Pp. 110–24 in Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: Routledge.
Leone, M. 1986. ‘Symbolic, Structural and Critical Archaeology’. Pp. 415–38 in American archaeology, past and future: a celebration of the Society for American Archaeology, 1935-1985. London: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Leone, M. 1987. ‘Towards a Critical Archaeology’. Current Anthropology 28(3):283–302.
Leone, M., and R. Preucel. 1992. ‘Archaeology in a Democratic Society: A Critical Perspective’. Pp. 115–35 in Quandaries and quests: visions of archaeology’s future. Vol. Occasional paper / Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale. [Carbondale, Ill.]: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.
Leone, Mark P. 1972. Contemporary Archaeology: A Guide to Theory and Contributions. Carbondale, Ill: Feffer & Simons.
Leone, Mark P. 2005. The Archaeology of Liberty in an American Capital: Excavations in Annapolis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lipo, Carl P. and Society for American Archaeology. 2006. Mapping Our Ancestors: Phylogenetic Approaches in Anthropology and Prehistory. New Brunswick, N.J.: Aldine Transaction.
Llobera, M. 1996. ‘Exploring the Topography of Mind: GIS, Social Space and Archaeology’. Antiquity 70(269):612–22.
Lucas, Gavin. 2001. ‘Introduction: Archaeology and the Field’. Pp. 1–17 in Critical approaches to fieldwork: contemporary and historical archaeological practice. London: Routledge.
Lucas, Gavin. 2005. The Archaeology of Time. Vol. Themes in archaeology. London: Routledge.
Lucas, Gavin. 2008. ‘Time and Archaeological Event’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18(01):59–65. doi: 10.1017/S095977430800005X.
Lucas, Gavin. 2012. Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lydon, Jane and Rizvi, Uzma Z. 2010. Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology. Vol. World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press.
Lyman, R. L. 2007. ‘What Is the `process’ in Cultural Process and in Processual Archaeology?’ Anthropological Theory 7(2):217–50. doi: 10.1177/1463499607077299.
Lyman, R. L., and M. J. O’Brien. 2004. ‘A History of Normative Theory in Americanist Archaeology’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 11(4):369–96.
Lyman, R. Lee, and Michael J. O’Brien. 2000. ‘Measuring and Explaining Change in Artifact Variation with Clade-Diversity Diagrams’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 19(1):39–74. doi: 10.1006/jaar.1999.0339.
Lyman, R. Lee, O’Brien, Michael J., and Dunnell, Robert C. 1997. The Rise and Fall of Culture History. London: Plenum Press.
Mace, Ruth, Holden, Clare Janaki, and Shennan, Stephen. 2005. The Evolution of Cultural Diversity: A Phylogenetic Approach. London: UCL Press.
MacGregor, G. 1994. ‘Post-Processual Archaeology: The Hidden Agenda of the Secret Agent’. Pp. 79–91 in Archaeological theory: progress or posture?. Vol. Worldwide archaeology series. Aldershot: Avebury.
Mackenzie, Iain M. 1994a. Archaeological Theory: Progress or Posture? Vol. Worldwide archaeology series. Aldershot: Avebury.
Mackenzie, Iain M. 1994b. Archaeological Theory: Progress or Posture? Vol. Worldwide archaeology series. Aldershot: Avebury.
Madonna L. Moss. 2005. ‘Rifts in the Theoretical Landscape of Archaeology in the United States: A Comment on Hegmon and Watkins’. American Antiquity 70(3):581–87.
Margaret W. Conkey. 2007a. ‘Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology?’ Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 14(3):285–310.
Margaret W. Conkey. 2007b. ‘Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology?’ Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 14(3):285–310.
Martinón-Torres, Marcos. 2002. ‘Chaîne Opératoire: The Concept and Its Aplications within the Study of Technology’. Gallaecia 21:29–43.
Maschner, Herbert D. G., Chippindale, Christopher, and Bentley, R. Alexander. 2008. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Mason, David J. P. and Symonds, Matthew F. A. 2009. Frontiers of Knowledge: A Research Framework for Hadrian’s Wall, Part of the Frontiers of the Roman Empire World Heritage Site. Durham: Durham County Council and Durham University.
McGlade, James. 1999. ‘Archaeology and the Evolution of Cultural Landscapes: Towards an Interdisciplinary Agenda’. Pp. 458–82 in The archaeology and anthropology of landscape: shaping your landscape. Vol. One world archaeology. London: Routledge.
McGuire, R. 2004. ‘Contested Pasts: Archaeology and Native Americans’. Pp. 374–95 in A companion to social archaeology. Vol. Social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd.
McGuire, Randall H. 2008. Archaeology as Political Action. Vol. California series in public anthropology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Megaw, J. V. S., and M. R. Megaw. 1996. ‘Ancient Celts and Modern Ethnicity’. Antiquity 70(267):175–81.
Meskell, Lynn. 1998. Archaeology under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. London: Routledge.
Meskell, Lynn. 1999a. Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class et Cetera in Ancient Egypt. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Meskell, Lynn. 1999b. Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class et Cetera in Ancient Egypt. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Meskell, Lynn. 1999c. Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class et Cetera in Ancient Egypt. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Meskell, Lynn. 2002. ‘The Intersections of Identity and Politics in Archaeology’. Annual Review of Anthropology 31(1):279–301. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085457.
Meskell, Lynn. 2004. Object Worlds in Ancient Egypt: Material Biographies Past and Present. Vol. Materializing culture. Oxford: Berg.
Meskell, Lynn. 2006. Archaeologies of Materiality. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
Meskell, Lynn. 2012. ‘Archaeologies of Identity’. Pp. 187–213 in Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: Polity.
Meskell, Lynn and Joyce, Rosemary A. 2003a. Embodied Lives: Figuring Ancient Maya and Egyptian Experience. London: Routledge.
Meskell, Lynn and Joyce, Rosemary A. 2003b. Embodied Lives: Figuring Ancient Maya and Egyptian Experience. London: Routledge.
Meskell, Lynn and Preucel, Robert W. 2004. A Companion to Social Archaeology. Vol. Social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd.
Michael Shanks. 2007. ‘Symmetrical Archaeology’. World Archaeology 39(4):589–96.
Michelle Hegmon. 2003. ‘Setting Theoretical Egos Aside: Issues and Theory in North American Archaeology’. American Antiquity 68(2):213–43.
Michelle Hegmon. 2005. ‘No More Theory Wars: A Response to Moss’. American Antiquity 70(3):588–90.
Miller, D. 2002. ‘Artefacts and the Meaning of Things’. Pp. 396–419 in Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. Vol. Routledge world reference. London: Routledge.
Miller, Daniel. 2005. Materiality. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
Miller, Daniel, and Christopher Y. Tilley. 1984. ‘Ideology, Power and Prehistory: An Introduction’. Pp. 1–15 in Ideology, power and prehistory. Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mithen, Steven J. 1990. Thoughtful Foragers: A Study of Prehistoric Decision Making. Vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press.
Mithen, Steven J. 1996. The Prehistory of the Mind: A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion and Science. London: Thames & Hudson.
Mizoguchi, Kōji. 2006. Archaeology, Society and Identity in Modern Japan. Vol. Cambridge studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, Henrietta L. 1994. ‘Bodies on the Move: Gender, Power and Material Culture’. Pp. 71–85 in A passion for difference: essays in anthropology and gender. Cambridge: Polity.
Moore, T. 2011. ‘Detribalizing the Later Prehistoric Past: Concepts of Tribes in Iron Age and Roman Studies’. Journal of Social Archaeology 11(3):334–60. doi: 10.1177/1469605311403861.
Moshenska, Gabriel and Dhanjal, Sarah. 2012. Community Archaeology: Themes, Methods and Practices. Oxford: Oxbow.
Murray, T. 1993. ‘Communication and the Importance of Disciplinary Communities: Who Owns the Past?’ Pp. 105–16 in Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda?. Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murray, Tim and World Archaeological Congress. 1999. Time and Archaeology. Vol. One world archaeology. London: Routledge.
Mytum, Harold. 2007. ‘Materiality and Memory: An Archaeological Perspective on the Popular Adoption of Linear Time in Britain’. Antiquity 81(312):381–96.
Nancy D. Munn. 1992. ‘The Cultural Anthropology of Time: A Critical Essay’. Annual Review of Anthropology 21:93–123.
Nanni, G. 2011. ‘Time, Empire and Resistance in Settler-Colonial Victoria’. Time & Society 20(1):5–33. doi: 10.1177/0961463X10369765.
Nelson, M. C. 1991. ‘The Study of Technological Organization’. Archaeological Method and Theory 3:57–100.
Nelson, Sarah M. 2006. Handbook of Gender in Archaeology. Vol. Gender and archaeology series. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Nesbitt, C., and D. Tolia-Kelly. 2009. ‘Hadrian’s Wall: Embodied Archaeologies of the Linear Monument’. Journal of Social Archaeology 9(3):368–90. doi: 10.1177/1469605309338428.
O’Brien, Michael J. 2003. ‘Style, Function, Transmission: An Introduction’. Pp. 1–32 in Style, function, transmission: evolutionary archaeological perspectives. Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
O’Brien, Michael J., R. Lee Lyman, and Robert D. Leonard. 2003. ‘What Is Evolution? A Response to Bamforth’. American Antiquity 68(3):573–80.
O’Brien, Michael J., Lyman, R. Lee, and Schiffer, Michael B. 2005a. Archaeology as a Process: Processualism and Its Progeny. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
O’Brien, Michael J., Lyman, R. Lee, and Schiffer, Michael B. 2005b. Archaeology as a Process: Processualism and Its Progeny. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Olsen, B. 2012. ‘Symmetical Archaeology’. Pp. 208–28 in Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: Polity.
Olsen, BjØrnar. 2003. ‘Material Culture after Text: Re‐membering Things’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36(2):87–104. doi: 10.1080/00293650310000650.
Olsen, Bjørnar. 2012. Archaeology: The Discipline of Things. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Papaconstantinou, Demetra. 2006. Deconstructing Context: A Critical Approach to Archaeological Practice. Oxford: Oxbow.
Parker Pearson et. al., M. 2006. ‘Stonehenge, Its River and Its Landscape: Unravelling the Mysteries of a Prehistoric Sacred Place’. Archäologischer Anzeiger: Beiblatt Zum Jahrbuch Des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 1:237–58.
Parker Pearson et. al., M. 2007. ‘The Age of Stonehenge’. Antiquity 81(313):617–39.
Parker Pearson et. al., M. 2009. ‘Who Was Buried at Stonehenge?’ Antiquity 83(319):23–39.
Parker Pearson, M. and Ramilisonina. 1998a. ‘Stonehenge for the Ancestors: The Stones Pass on the Message’. Antiquity 72(276):308–26.
Parker Pearson, M. and Ramilisonina. 1998b. ‘Stonehenge for the Ancestors: The Stones Pass on the Message’. Antiquity 72(276):308–26.
Patrik, L. E. 1985. ‘Is There an Archaeological Record?’ Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8:27–62.
Patterson, T. 2004. ‘Social Archaeology and Marxist Social Thought’. Pp. 66–81 in A companion to social archaeology. Vol. Social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd.
Patterson, Thomas Carl. 2003. Marx’s Ghost: Conversations with Archaeologists. Oxford: Berg.
Pauketat, T. R. 2001a. ‘Practice and History in Archaeology: An Emerging Paradigm’. Anthropological Theory 1(1):73–98. doi: 10.1177/146349960100100105.
Pauketat, T. R. 2001b. ‘Practice and History in Archaeology: An Emerging Paradigm’. Anthropological Theory 1(1):73–98. doi: 10.1177/146349960100100105.
Pearson, M. P. 2006. ‘Materializing Stonehenge: The Stonehenge Riverside Project and New Discoveries’. Journal of Material Culture 11(1–2):227–61. doi: 10.1177/1359183506063024.
Pearson, Mike Parker, Tim Schadla-Hall, and Gabe Moshenska. 2011. ‘Resolving the Human Remains Crisis in British Archaeology’. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 21:5–9. doi: 10.5334/pia.369.
Pfaffenberger, Bryan. 1992. ‘Social Anthropology of Technology’. Annual Review of Anthropology 21(1):491–516. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002423.
Plog, F. 1973. ‘Laws, Systems of Laws and the Explanation of Observed Variation’. Pp. 649–61 in The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: Duckworth.
Pluciennik, Mark, Tarlow, Sarah, and Hamilakis, Yannis. 2002. Thinking through the Body: Archaeologies of Corporeality. London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Pope, Rachel. 2011a. ‘Processual Archaeology and Gender Politics. The Loss of Innocence’. Archaeological Dialogues 18(1):59–86. doi: 10.1017/S1380203811000134.
Pope, Rachel. 2011b. ‘Processual Archaeology and Gender Politics. The Loss of Innocence’. Archaeological Dialogues 18(01):59–86. doi: 10.1017/S1380203811000134.
Powell, A., S. Shennan, and M. G. Thomas. 2009. ‘Late Pleistocene Demography and the Appearance of Modern Human Behavior’. Science 324(5932):1298–1301. doi: 10.1126/science.1170165.
Praetzellis, Adrian. 2000. Death by Theory: A Tale of Mystery and Archaeological Theory. Oxford: AltaMira Press.
Preucel, R. W. 1995. ‘The Postprocessual Condition’. Journal of Archaeological Research 3(2):147–75.
Preucel, R. W., and S. A. Mrozowski. 2010. ‘The New Pragmatism’. Pp. 3–49 in Contemporary archaeology in theory: the new pragmatism. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Preucel, Robert, and Alexander Bauer. 2001. ‘Archaeological Pragmatics’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 34(2):85–96. doi: 10.1080/00293650127469.
Preucel, Robert W. 2006. Archaeological Semiotics. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Price, Barbara J. 1982. ‘Cultural Materialism: A Theoretical Review’. American Antiquity 47(4):709–41.
Quirke, Stephen. 2010. Hidden Hands: Egyptian Workforces in Petrie Excavation Archives, 1880-1924. Vol. Duckworth egyptology. London: Gerald Duckworth.
R. Alexander Bentley, Matthew W. Hahn and Stephen J. Shennan. 2004. ‘Random Drift and Culture Change’. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 271(1547):1443–50.
Ratnagar, Shereen. 2004. ‘Archaeology at the Heart of a Political Confrontation: The Case of Ayodhya’. Current Anthropology 45(2):239–59. doi: 10.1086/381044.
Rautman, Alison E. and Gender and Archaeology Conference. 2000. Reading the Body: Representations and Remains in the Archaeological Record. Vol. Regendering the past. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Redman, C. 1999. ‘The Development of Archaeological Theory’. Pp. 48–80 in Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. London: Routledge.
Redman, C. L. 1991. ‘Distinguished Lecture in Archaeology: In Defence of the Seventies - The Adolescence of New Archaeology’. American Anthropologist 93(2):295–307.
Redman, Charles L. 1978. Social Archeology: Beyond Subsistence and Dating. Vol. Studies in archeology. New York: Academic Press.
Rega, E. 1996. ‘Age, Gender and Biological Reality in the Early Bronze Age Cemetery at Mokrin’. Pp. 229–47 in Invisible people and processes: writing gender and childhood into European archaeology. London: Leicester University Press.
Reid, Donald M. 2002. Whose Pharaohs?: Archaeology, Museums, and Egyptian National Identity from Napoleon to World War I. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.
Reinhard Bernbeck and Susan Pollock. 1996. ‘Ayodhya, Archaeology, and Identity’. Current Anthropology 37(1):S138–42.
Renfrew, C. 1994. ‘Towards a Cognitive Archaeology’. Pp. 3–12 in The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Renfrew, Colin. 1972. ‘Culture Systems and the Multiplier Effect’. Pp. 19–44 in The emergence of civilisation: the Cyclades and the Aegean in the Third Millennium B.C. Vol. Studies in prehistory. London: Methuen.
Renfrew, Colin. 1973a. ‘Monuments, Mobilization and Social Organisation in Neolithic Wessex’. Pp. 539–58 in The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: Duckworth.
Renfrew, Colin. 1973b. ‘Monuments, Mobilization and Social Organization in Neolithic Wessex’. Pp. 539–58 in The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: Duckworth.
Renfrew, Colin. 1999. ‘Beyond Diffusion’. Pp. 109–19 in Before civilization: the radiocarbon revolution and prehistoric Europe. London: Pimlico.
Renfrew, Colin, Cunliffe, Barry W., and British Academy. 1997. Science and Stonehenge. Vol. Proceedings of the British Academy. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy.
Renfrew, Colin, DeMarrais, Elizabeth, and Gosden, Chris. 2004. Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World. Vol. McDonald Institute monographs. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Renfrew, Colin and Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects. 1973. The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory. London: Duckworth.
Review by: Lewis R. Binford. n.d. ‘American Antiquity’. Vol. 53(No. 4):875–76.
Richards, Julian C., Allen, Mike, and English Heritage. 1990. The Stonehenge Environs Project. Vol. Archaeological report. London: Historical Buildings & Monuments Commission for England.
Richards, Julian C. and English Heritage. 1991. English Heritage Book of Stonehenge. London: B. T. Batsford Ltd./ English Heritage.
Richerson, Peter J. and Boyd, Robert. 2005. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Richerson, Peter J., and Robert Boyd. 2005. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Robb, J. E. 1998. ‘The Archaeology of Symbols’. Annual Review of Anthropology 27:329–46. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.329.
Robb, John E., and Marcia-Anne Dobres. 2000. ‘Agency in Archaeology: Paradigm or Platitude?’ Pp. 3–17 in Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge.
Robb, John, and Timothy R. Pauketat. 2013. Big Histories, Human Lives: Tackling Problems of Scale in Archaeology. Vol. School for Advanced Research advanced seminar series. Santa Fe, N.M.: School for Advanced Research Press.
Robert C. Dunnell. 1982. ‘The Harvey Lecture Series. Science, Social Science, and Common Sense: The Agonizing Dilemma of Modern Archaeology’. Journal of Anthropological Research 38(1):1–25.
Rosen, Ralph Mark and University of Pennsylvania. 2004. Time and Temporality in the Ancient World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.
Roskams, Steve. 2001. ‘Future Prospects’. Pp. 267–90 in Excavation. Vol. Cambridge manuals in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ross, Jennifer C. and Steadman, Sharon R. 2010. Agency and Identity in the Ancient Near East: New Paths Forward. Vol. Approaches to anthropological archaeology. London: Equinox.
Rowley-Conwy, P., Robert Layton, and Catherine Panter-Brick. 2001. Hunter-Gatherers: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Vol. The Biosocial Society symposium series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saitta, Dean J. 2007. The Archaeology of Collective Action. Vol. The American experience in archaeological perspective. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
Scarre, Geoffrey, and Robin Coningham. 2013. Appropriating the Past: Philosophical Perspectives on the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schiffer, M. B., and J. M. Skibo. 1997. ‘The Explanation of Artifact Variability’. American Antiquity 62(1):27–50.
Schiffer, Michael B. 1972. ‘Archaeological Context and Systemic Context’. American Antiquity 37(2):156–65.
Schiffer, Michael B. 1976. Behavioral Archaeology. Vol. Studies in archaeology. London: Academic Press.
Schiffer, Michael B. 1985. ‘Is There a “Pompeii Premise” in Archaeology?’ Journal of Anthropological Research 41(1):18–41.
Schiffer, Michael B. 1987. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. Albuquerque, N.M.: University of New Mexico Press.
Schiffer, Michael B. 1995. Behavioral Archaeology: First Principles. Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Schlanger , N. 1994. ‘Mindful Technology: Unleashing the Chaine Operatoire for an Archaeology of Mind’. Pp. 143–51 in The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schnapp, A. 2002. ‘Between Antiquarians and Archaeologists - Continuities and Ruptures’. Antiquity 76(291):134–40.
Shanks, Michael. 2008a. ‘Post-Processual Archaeology and After’. Pp. 133–44 in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Shanks, Michael. 2008b. ‘Post-Processual Archaeology and After’. Pp. 133–44 in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Shanks, Michael, and Ian Hodder. 1994. ‘Processual, Postprocessual and Interpretive Archaeologies’. Pp. 3–29 in Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: Routledge.
Shanks, Michael, and R. H. McGuire. 1996. ‘The Craft of Archaeology’. American Antiquity 61(1):75–88.
Shanks, Michael, and Christopher Tilley. 1987. ‘Abstract and Substantial Time’. Archaeological Review From Cambridge 6(1):32–41.
Shanks, Michael, and Christopher Tilley. 1989. ‘Comments on Archaeology into the 1990s’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 22(1):12–54.
Shanks, Michael, and Christopher Y Tilley. 1987. ‘Archaeology and the Politics of Theory’. Pp. 186–208 in Social theory and archaeology. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell.
Shanks, Michael, and Christopher Y. Tilley. 1987. ‘The Individual and the Social’. Pp. 61–78 in Social theory and archaeology. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell.
Shanks, Michael, and Christopher Y. Tilley. 1992. ‘Chapter 3: Facts and Values in Archaeology’. Pp. 46–67 in Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice. London: Routledge.
Shanks, Michael and Tilley, Christopher Y. 1992. Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Shennan, S. 2011. ‘Descent with Modification and the Archaeological Record’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366(1567):1070–79. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0380.
Shennan, S. J. 1994. ‘Introduction: Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity’. Pp. 1–32 in Archaeological approaches to cultural identity. Vol. One world archaeology. London: Routledge.
Shennan, S. J. 2011. ‘An Evolutionary Perspective on the Goals of Archaeology’. Pp. 325–44 in Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast.
Shennan, Stephen. 2002a. Genes, Memes and Human History: Darwinian Archaeology and Cultural Evolution. London: Thames & Hudson.
Shennan, Stephen. 2002b. Genes, Memes and Human History: Darwinian Archaeology and Cultural Evolution. London: Thames & Hudson.
Shennan, Stephen. 2008. ‘Evolution in Archaeology’. Annual Review of Anthropology 37(1):75–91. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085153.
Shennan, Stephen. 2009. Pattern and Process in Cultural Evolution. Vol. Origins of human behavior and culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Shott, Michael J. 1998. ‘Status and Role of Formation Theory in Contemporary Archaeological Practice’. Journal of Archaeological Research 6(4):299–329.
Sigault, F. 2002. ‘Technology’. Pp. 420–59 in Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. Vol. Routledge world reference. London: Routledge.
SILLAR, B., and M. S. TITE. 2000. ‘THE CHALLENGE OF ‘TECHNOLOGICAL CHOICES’FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE APPROACHES IN ARCHAEOLOGY’. Archaeometry 42(1):2–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x.
Sillar, Bill. 2009. ‘The Social Agency of Things? Animism and Materiality in the Andes’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19(03):367–77. doi: 10.1017/S0959774309000559.
Sinclair, A. 2000. ‘Constellations of Knowledge: Human Agency and Material Affordance in Lithic Technology’. Pp. 196–212 in Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge.
Smith, Laurajane. 2004a. Archaeological Theory and the Politics of Cultural Heritage. London: Routledge.
Smith, Laurajane. 2004b. Archaeological Theory and the Politics of Cultural Heritage. London: Routledge.
Smith, Stuart Tyson. 2003. Wretched Kush: Ethnic Identities and Boudaries in Egypt’s Nubian Empire. London: Routledge.
Sofaer, Joanna R. 2006. The Body as Material Culture: A Theoretical Osteoarchaeology. Vol. Topics in contemporary archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig. 1997. ‘Reading Dress: The Construction of Social Categories and Identities in Bronze Age Europe’. Journal of European Archaeology 5(1):93–114. doi: 10.1179/096576697800703656.
Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig. 2000. Gender Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Spaulding, A. C. 1953. ‘Statistical Techniques for the Discovery of Artifact Types’. American Antiquity 18(4):305–13.
Spector, J. 1991. ‘What This Awl Means: Towards a Feminist Archaeology’. Pp. 388–406 in Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Spriggs, M. 2008. ‘Ethnographic Parallels and the Denial of History’. World Archaeology 40(4):538–52. doi: 10.1080/00438240802453161.
Stark, Miriam T. 1998. The Archaeology of Social Boundaries. Vol. Smithsonian series in archaeological inquiry. London: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Steven Mithen. 1995. ‘Understanding Mind and Culture: Evolutionary Psychology or Social Anthropology?’ Anthropology Today 11(6):3–7.
Stottman, M. Jay. 2010. Archaeologists as Activists: Can Archaeologists Change the World? Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Strauss, Claudia. 2007. ‘Blaming for Columbine’. Current Anthropology 48(6):807–32. doi: 10.1086/520975.
Tarlow, Sarah, and Liv Nilsson Stutz. 2013. ‘Can an Archaeologist Be a Public Intellectual?’ Archaeological Dialogues 20(01):1–5. doi: 10.1017/S1380203813000032.
Tarlow, Sarah and West, Susie. 1999. The Familiar Past?: Archaeologies of Later Historical Britain. London: Routledge.
Taylor, T. 2008. ‘Materiality’. Pp. 297–320 in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Taylor, Walter W. 1948a. ‘Chapter 6’. in A study of archaeology. Vol. Memoir series of the American Anthropological Association. [S.l.]: American Anthropological Association.
Taylor, Walter W. 1948b. ‘Chapter 6’. in A study of archaeology. Vol. Memoir series of the American Anthropological Association. [S.l.]: American Anthropological Association.
Taylor, Walter W. 1972. ‘Old Wine and New Skins: A Contemporary Parable’. Pp. 28–33 in Contemporary archaeology: a guide to theory and contributions. Carbondale, Ill: Feffer & Simons.
Thomas, David Hurst. 2000. Skull Wars: Kennewick Man, Archaeology, and the Battle for Native American Identity. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books.
Thomas, J. 1994a. ‘Where Are We Now? Archaeological Theory in the 1990s’. Pp. 343–62 in Theory in archaeology: a world perspective. London: Routledge.
Thomas, J. 1994b. ‘Where Are We Now? Archaeological Theory in the 1990s’. Pp. 343–62 in Theory in archaeology: a world perspective. London: Routledge.
Thomas, J. 1999a. ‘Culture and Identity’. Pp. 431–69 in Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. London: Routledge.
Thomas, J. 1999b. ‘Culture and Identity’. Pp. 431–69 in Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. London: Routledge.
Thomas, J. 2012. ‘Archaeologies of Place and Landscape’. Pp. 165–86 in Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: Polity.
Thomas, J. S. 1993. ‘The Politics of Vision and the Archaeologies of Landscape’. Pp. 19–48 in Landscape: politics and perspectives. Vol. Explorations in anthropology. New York: Berg.
Thomas, Julian. 1996a. Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretative Archaeology. London: Routledge.
Thomas, Julian. 1996b. Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretative Archaeology. New York: Routledge.
Thomas, Julian. 2004. Archaeology and Modernity. London: Routledge.
Thomas, Julian. 2004a. ‘Chapter 6’. in Archaeology and modernity. London: Routledge.
Thomas, Julian. 2004b. ‘Humanism and the Individual: Chapter 6’. Pp. 119–48 in Archaeology and modernity. London: Routledge.
Thomas, Julian and David, Bruno. 2008. Handbook of Landscape Archaeology. Vol. World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press.
Thomas, Julian, Jorge, Vítor Oliveira, and Theoretical Archaeology Group (England). 2007. Overcoming the Modern Invention of Material Culture: Proceedings of the TAG Session, Exeter 2006. Vol. Journal of Iberian archaeology. Porto: ADECAP.
Tilley, C. 1989. ‘Interpreting Material Culture’. Pp. 185–94 in The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. Vol. One world archaeology. London: Routledge.
Tilley, Christopher. 1989. ‘Excavation as Theatre’. Antiquity 63(239):275–80.
Tilley, Christopher. 2004a. ‘Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 14(2):185–203. doi: 10.1017/S0959774304000125.
Tilley, Christopher. 2004b. ‘Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 14(2):185–203. doi: 10.1017/S0959774304000125.
Tilley, Christopher, and Wayne Bennett. 2001. ‘An Archaeology of Super-Natural Places: The Case of West Penwith’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7(2):335–62.
Tilley, Christopher Y. 1984. ‘Ideology and the Legitimation of Power in the Middle Neolithic of Southern Sweden’. Pp. 111–45 in Ideology, power and prehistory. Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tilley, Christopher Y. 1989. ‘Archaeology as Socio-Political Action in the Present’. Pp. 104–16 in Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: essays in the philosophy, history and socio-politics of archaeology. Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tilley, Christopher Y. 1992. Interpretative Archaeology. Vol. Explorations in anthropology. New York: Berg.
Tilley, Christopher Y. 1994. ‘Space, Place, Landscape and Perception: Phenomenological Perspectives’. Pp. 7–34 in A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments. Vol. Explorations in anthropology. Oxford: Berg.
Tilley, Christopher Y. 1996. ‘The Powers of Rocks: Topography and Monument Construction on Bodmin Moor’. World Archaeology 28(2):161–76.
Tilley, Christopher Y. 1999. Metaphor and Material Culture. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Tilley, Christopher Y. 2008. ‘Phenomenological Approaches to Landscape Archaeology’. Pp. 271–76 in Handbook of landscape archaeology. Vol. World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press.
Tim Ingold. 1993. ‘The Temporality of the Landscape’. World Archaeology 25(2):152–74.
Treherne, P. 1995. ‘The Warrior’s Beauty: The Masculine Body and Self-Identity in Bronze Age Europe’. Journal of European Archaeology: Journal of the European Association of Archaeologists 3(1):105–44.
Trigger, B G. 1984. ‘Archaeology at the Crossroads: What’s New?’ Annual Review of Anthropology 13(1):275–300. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.001423.
Trigger, Bruce G. 1970. ‘Aims in Prehistoric Archaeology’. Antiquity 44(173):26–37.
Trigger, Bruce G. 1978. ‘Current Trends in American Archaeology’. Pp. 2–18 in Time and traditions: essays in archaeological interpretation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Trigger, Bruce G. 1980. ‘Archaeology and the Image of the American Indian’. American Antiquity 45(4):662–76.
Trigger, Bruce G. . 1984. ‘Alternative Archaeologies: Nationalist, Colonialist, Imperialist’. Man 19(3):355–70.
Trigger, Bruce G. . 1991. ‘Distinguished Lecture in Archaeology: Constraint and Freedom - A New Synthesis for Archaeological Explanation’. American Anthropologist 93(3):551–69.
Trigger, Bruce G. 1991. ‘Post‐processual Developments in Anglo‐American Archaeology’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 24(2):65–76.
Trigger, Bruce G. 1995. ‘Expanding Middle-Range Theory’. Antiquity 69(264):449–58.
Trigger, Bruce G. 2003. ‘Hyper-Relativism, Responsibility and the Social Sciences’. Pp. 113–31 in Artifacts & ideas: essays in archaeology. London: Transaction.
Trigger, Bruce G. 2006a. A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trigger, Bruce G. 2006b. A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trigger, Bruce G. 2006a. ‘Chapter 7’. in A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trigger, Bruce G. 2006b. ‘Chapter 8: Processualism and Post-Processualism’. in A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trigger, Bruce G. 2006c. ‘Chapter 9 and 10’. in A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trigger, Bruce G. 2006d. ‘Culture-Historical Archaeology’. Pp. 211–313 in A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tringham, R. 2000. ‘Engendered Places in Prehistory’. Pp. 329–57 in Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: Leicester University Press.
Ucko, Peter J., and Robert Layton. 1999. ‘Introduction: Gazing on the Landscape and Encountering the Environment’. Pp. 1–20 in The archaeology and anthropology of landscape: shaping your landscape. Vol. One world archaeology. London: Routledge.
Ucko, Peter J. and Theoretical Archaeology Group. 1994. Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. London: Routledge.
Urban, Patricia A. and Schortman, Edward M. 2012. Archaeological Theory in Practice. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press.
Van Dyke, Ruth and Alcock, Susan E. 2003. Archaeologies of Memory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
VanPool, C. S., and T. L. VanPool. 1999. ‘The Scientific Nature of Post-Processualism’. American Antiquity 64(1):33–53.
VanPool, T. L., and C. S. VanPool. 2001. ‘Postprocessualism and the Nature of Science: A Response to Comments by Hutson and Arnold and Wilkens’. American Antiquity 66(2):367–75.
VanPool, Todd L., and Christine S. VanPool. 2003. ‘Agency and Evolution: The Role of Intended and Unintended Consequences of Action’. Pp. 89–113 in Essential tensions in archaeological method and theory. Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
VanPool, Todd L. and VanPool, Christine S. 2003. Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory. Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Wagstaff, J. Malcolm. 1987. Landscape and Culture: Geographical and Archaeological Perspectives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Watson, P. J. 2008. ‘Processualism and After’. Pp. 29–38 in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Watts, Christopher M. 2013. Relational Archaeologies: Humans, Animals, Things. London: Routledge.
Webmoor, Timothy, and Christopher L. Witmore. 2008. ‘Things Are Us! A Commentary on Human/Things Relations under the Banner of a “Social” Archaeology’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 41(1):53–70. doi: 10.1080/00293650701698423.
Webster, G. 2008. ‘Culture History: A Culture-Historical Approach’. Pp. 11–27 in Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Wheatley, D. 1995. ‘Cumulative Viewshed Analysis: A GIS-Based Method for Investigating Inter-Visibility and Its Archaeological Implication’. Pp. 171–86 in Archaeology and geographical information systems: a European perspective. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
Wheeler, Robert Eric Mortimer. 1954. Archaeology from the Earth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Whitehouse, R. 2011. ‘Cultural and Biological Approaches to the Body in Archaeology: Can They Be Reconciled?" ’. Pp. 227–44 in Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast.
Whitehouse, Ruth. 1998. ‘Feminism and Archaeology: An Awkward Relationship’. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 9:1–7.
Whitley, James. 2013. ‘Homer’s Entangled Objects: Narrative, Agency and Personhood In and Out of Iron Age Texts’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 23(03):395–416. doi: 10.1017/S095977431300053X.
Whittle, Alasdair, Alex Bayliss, and Frances Healy. 2008. ‘The Timing and Tempo of Change: Examples from the Fourth Millennium Cal. BC in Southern England’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18(01):65–70. doi: 10.1017/S0959774308000061.
Wiessner, P. 1989. ‘Style and Changing Relations between the Individual and Society’. Pp. 56–63 in The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. Vol. One world archaeology. London: Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic.
Wilkinson, Darryl. 2013. ‘The Emperor’s New Body: Personhood, Ontology and the Inka Sovereign’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 23(03):417–32. doi: 10.1017/S0959774313000541.
Wilmott, T. 1995. ‘Collapse Theory and the End of Birdoswald’. Pp. 59–69 in Theoretical Roman archaeology: second conference proceedings. Vol. Worldwide archaeology series. Aldershot: Avebury.
Wilmott, Tony and English Heritage. 2009. Hadrian’s Wall: Archaeological Research by English Heritage 1976-2000. Swindon: English Heritage.
Winterhalder, Bruce, Douglas J. Kennett, Mark N. Grote, and Jacob Bartruff. 2010. ‘Ideal Free Settlement of California’s Northern Channel Islands’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 29(4):469–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2010.07.001.
Witcher, R. 2010. ‘The Fabulous Tales of the Common People, Part 1: Representing Hadrian’s Wall’. Public Archaeology 9(3):126–52. doi: 10.1179/146551810X12822101587138.
Witcher, R., D. P. Tolia-Kelly, and R. Hingley. 2010. ‘Archaeologies of Landscape: Excavating the Materialities of Hadrian’s Wall’. Journal of Material Culture 15(1):105–28. doi: 10.1177/1359183510355228.
Wobst, H. M. 1977. ‘Stylistic Behavior Ad Information Exchange’. Pp. 317–42 in For the director: research essays in honor of James B. Griffin. Vol. Anthropological papers, Museum of Anthropology. University of Michigan. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.
Wobst, H. M. 1999. ‘Style in Archaeology or Archaeologists in Style’. Pp. 118–32 in Material meanings: critical approaches to the interpretation of material culture. Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Wylie, A. 1985. ‘The Reaction against Analogy’. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8:63–111.
Wylie, A. 1992. ‘On “Heavily Decomposing Red Herrings”. Scientific Method in Archaeology and the Ladening of Evidence with Theory’. Pp. 145–57 in Metaarchaeology: reflections by archaeologists and philosophers. Vol. Boston studies in the philosophy of science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Wylie, Alison. 1989. ‘The Interpretive Dilemma’. Pp. 18–27 in Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: essays in the philosophy, history and socio-politics of archaeology. Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wylie, Alison. 1991. ‘Gender Theory and the Archaeological Record: Why Is There No Archaeology of Gender?’ Pp. 31–54 in Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wylie, Alison. 1992a. ‘The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender’. American Antiquity 57(1):15–35.
Wylie, Alison. 1992b. ‘The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender’. American Antiquity 57(1):15–35.
Wylie, Alison. 1995. ‘Alternative Histories. Epistemic Disunity and Political Integrity’. Pp. 255–72 in Making alternative histories: the practice of archaeology and history in non-Western settings. Vol. School of American Research advanced seminar series. Santa Fe, N.M: School of American Research Press.
Yates, T. 1992. ‘Frameworks for an Archaeology of the Body’. Pp. 31–72 in Interpretative archaeology. Vol. Explorations in anthropology. New York: Berg.
Yoffee, Norman and Sherratt, Andrew. 1993. Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda? Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zarankin, Andrés, Salerno, Melisa A., and Funari, Pedro Paulo A. 2009. Memories from Darkness: Archaeology of Repression and Resistance in Latin America. Vol. Contributions to global historical archaeology. London: Springer.
Zimmerman, Larry J., Vitelli, Karen D., and Hollowell-Zimmer, Julie. 2003. Ethical Issues in Archaeology. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.