Bibliography for ARCL2028: Current Issues in Archaeological Theory

1.
Greene, Kevin, Moore, Tom. Archaeology: an introduction. 5th ed. London: Routledge; 2010.

2.
Henson D. Doing archaeology: a subject guide for students [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2012. Available from: https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9780203109878/archaeology-donald-henson

3.
Hodder I, Hutson S. Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology [Internet]. Third edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814211

4.
Hodder, Ian. The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999.

5.
Hodder, Ian. Archaeological theory today [Internet]. Cambridge: Polity; 2001. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451

6.
Johnson, Matthew. Archaeological theory: an introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.

7.
Trigger, Bruce G. A history of archaeological thought [Internet]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Available from: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511813016

8.
Urban, Patricia A., Schortman, Edward M. Archaeological theory in practice. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2012.

9.
Hodder I. Towards a reflexive method. In: The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999. p. 80–104.

10.
Johnson M. Common sense is not enough. In: Archaeological theory: an introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 1–11.

11.
Redman C. The development of archaeological theory. In: Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. London: Routledge; 1999. p. 48–80.

12.
Bentley R, Alexander M. Introduction on archaeological theories. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press; 2008.

13.
Clarke DL. Archaeology: The loss of innocence. Antiquity. 1973;47(185):6–18.

14.
Margaret W. Conkey. Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 2007;14(3):285–310.

15.
Greene K. Chapter 6: making sense of the past. In: Archaeology: an introduction [Internet]. 5th ed. London: Routledge; 2010. p. 249–312. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203835975

16.
Hodder I. Introduction: a review of contemporary theoretical debate in archaeology. In: Archaeological theory today [Internet]. Cambridge: Polity; 2001. p. 1–13. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451

17.
Meskell, Lynn, Preucel, Robert W. A companion to social archaeology [Internet]. Vol. Social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd; 2004. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605

18.
O’Brien, Michael J., Lyman, R. Lee, Schiffer, Michael B. Archaeology as a process: processualism and its progeny. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 2005.

19.
Praetzellis, Adrian. Death by theory: a tale of mystery and archaeological theory. Oxford: AltaMira Press; 2000.

20.
Thomas J. Where are we now? Archaeological theory in the 1990s. In: Theory in archaeology: a world perspective. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 343–62.

21.
Trigger, Bruce G. A history of archaeological thought [Internet]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Available from: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511813016

22.
VanPool, Todd L., VanPool, Christine S. Essential tensions in archaeological method and theory. Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 2003.

23.
Yoffee, Norman, Sherratt, Andrew. Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda? Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.

24.
Childe VG. What happens in prehistory? In: Piecing together the past: the interpretation of archaeological data [Internet]. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1956. p. 135–58. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c1eea4f3-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099

25.
Hawkes C. Wenner-Gren Foundation Supper Conference - Archaeological theory and method: Some suggestiongs from the Old World. American Anthropologist [Internet]. 1954;56(2):155–68. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/664357

26.
Trigger BG. Culture-historical archaeology. In: A history of archaeological thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 211–313.

27.
Childe VG. Preface and chapter 1. In: The Danube in prehistory. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1929. p. v-xii-1–7.

28.
Gordon Childe V. Changing aims and methods in prehistory. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society [Internet]. 1935;1:1–15. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2028_47033.pdf

29.
Clark, Grahame. Archaeology and society. 3rd ed. London: Methuen; 1960.

30.
Diaz-Andreu M. Britain and the Other: the archaeology of imperialism. In: History, nationhood, and the question of Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004. p. 227–41.

31.
Díaz-Andreu García, Margarita. A world history of nineteenth-century archaeology: nationalism, colonialism, and the past [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. Available from: https://academic-oup-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/40265

32.
Fagan, Brian M. Grahame Clark: an intellectual biography of an archaeologist. Boulder, Colo: Westview; 2001.

33.
Harris, David R., Childe, V. Gordon, V. Gordon Childe Centennial Conference, University College, London, Prehistoric Society (London, England). The archaeology of V. Gordon Childe: contemporary perspectives : proceedings of the V. Gordon Childe Centennial Conference held at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 8-9 May 1992 under the auspices of the Institute of Archaeology and the Prehistoric Society. London: UCL Press; 1994.

34.
Hingley R. Chapters 9 and 10. In: Roman officers and English gentlemen: the imperial origins of Roman archaeology. New York: Routledge; 2000.

35.
Jones S. Chapter 2. In: The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. London: Routledge; 1997.

36.
Lyman, R. Lee, O’Brien, Michael J., Dunnell, Robert C. The rise and fall of culture history. London: Plenum Press; 1997.

37.
Lyman RL, O’Brien MJ. A history of normative theory in Americanist archaeology. Journal of archaeological method and theory. 2004;11(4):369–96.

38.
Patterson, Thomas Carl. Marx’s ghost: conversations with archaeologists. Oxford: Berg; 2003.

39.
Renfrew C. Beyond diffusion. In: Before civilization: the radiocarbon revolution and prehistoric Europe. London: Pimlico; 1999. p. 109–19.

40.
Schnapp A. Between antiquarians and archaeologists - Continuities and ruptures. Antiquity. 2002;76(291):134–40.

41.
Shennan SJ. Introduction: archaeological approaches to cultural identity. In: Archaeological approaches to cultural identity. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 1–32.

42.
Spaulding AC. Statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types. American Antiquity. 1953;18(4):305–13.

43.
Taylor WW. Chapter 6. In: A study of archaeology. [S.l.]: American Anthropological Association; 1948.

44.
Webster G. Culture history: a culture-historical approach. In: Handbook of archaeological theories [Internet]. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press; 2008. p. 11–27. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1

45.
Wheeler, Robert Eric Mortimer. Archaeology from the earth. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1954.

46.
Binford LR. Archaeological perspectives. In: New perspectives in archeology. Chicago: Aldine; 1968. p. 5–32.

47.
Binford LR. A consideration of archaeological research design. American Antiquity. 1964;29(4):425–41.

48.
Trigger BG. Current trends in American archaeology. In: Time and traditions: essays in archaeological interpretation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 1978. p. 2–18.

49.
Binford LR. Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity. 1962;28(2):217–25.

50.
Clarke DL. Archaeology: The loss of innocence. Antiquity. 1973;47(185):6–18.

51.
Clarke, David L., Chapman, Bob. Analytical archaeology. 2nd ed. London: Methuen; 1978.

52.
Clark G. Economic approach to prehistory. In: Economic prehistory: papers on archaeology. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Cambridge University Press; 1989. p. 149–68.

53.
Dunnell RC. Five decades of American archaeology. In: American archaeology, past and future: a celebration of the Society for American Archaeology, 1935-1985. London: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1986.

54.
Flannery KV. Culture history vs. culture process: A Debate in American archaeology. Scientific American. 1967;2(2):119–22.

55.
Flannery KV. Archaeological systems theory and early Mesoamerica. In: Anthropological archeology in the Americas. Washington, DC: The Anthropological Society of Washington; 1968. p. 67–87.

56.
Lyman RL. What is the `process’ in cultural process and in processual archaeology? Anthropological Theory. 2007 Jun 1;7(2):217–50.

57.
David J. Meltzer. Paradigms and the Nature of Change in American Archaeology. American Antiquity. 1979;44(4):644–57.

58.
O’Brien, Michael J., Lyman, R. Lee, Schiffer, Michael B. Archaeology as a process: processualism and its progeny. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 2005.

59.
Plog F. Laws, systems of laws and the explanation of observed variation. In: The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: Duckworth; 1973. p. 649–61.

60.
Redman CL. Distinguished lecture in archaeology: In defence of the seventies - The adolescence of New Archaeology. American Anthropologist. 1991;93(2):295–307.

61.
Renfrew C. Culture systems and the multiplier effect. In: The emergence of civilisation: the Cyclades and the Aegean in the Third Millennium BC. London: Methuen; 1972. p. 19–44.

62.
Renfrew C. Monuments, mobilization and social organization in Neolithic Wessex. In: The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: Duckworth; 1973. p. 539–58.

63.
Taylor WW. Chapter 6. In: A study of archaeology. [S.l.]: American Anthropological Association; 1948.

64.
Taylor WW. Old wine and new skins: A contemporary parable. In: Contemporary archaeology: a guide to theory and contributions. Carbondale, Ill: Feffer & Simons; 1972. p. 28–33.

65.
Trigger BG. Chapter 7. In: A history of archaeological thought [Internet]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016

66.
Trigger BG. Aims in prehistoric archaeology. Antiquity. 1970;44(173):26–37.

67.
Watson PJ. Processualism and after. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press; 2008. p. 29–38.

68.
Binford LR. Relics to artifacts and monuments to assemblages: changing conceptual frameworks. In: Bones: ancient men and modern myths. London: Academic Press; 1981. p. 3–20.

69.
Flannery KV. The Golden Marshalltown: A Parable for the Archeology of the 1980s. American Anthropologist [Internet]. 1982 Jun;84(2):265–78. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1982.84.2.02a00010

70.
Schiffer MB. Archaeological context and systemic context. American Antiquity. 1972;37(2):156–65.

71.
Arnold P. Back to basics: the middle-range program as pragmatic archaeology. In: Essential tensions in archaeological method and theory. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 2003. p. 55–66.

72.
Binford LR. General introduction. In: For theory building in archaeology: essays on faunal remains, aquatic resources, spatial analysis and systemic modeling. London: Academic Press; 1977. p. 1–10.

73.
Binford LR. Behavioural archaeological and the ‘Pompeii Premise’ . Journal of Anthropological Research. 1981;37(3):195–208.

74.
Binford, Lewis Roberts. Constructing frames of reference: an analytical method for archaeological theory building using hunter-gatherer and environmental data sets. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2001.

75.
Butzer, Karl W. Archaeology as human ecology: method and theory for a contextual approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982.

76.
Courbin, Paul. What is archaeology?: an essay on the nature of archaeological research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1988.

77.
Robert C. Dunnell. The Harvey Lecture Series. Science, Social Science, and Common Sense: The Agonizing Dilemma of Modern Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Research. 1982;38(1):1–25.

78.
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1983 Jun;2(2):117–63.

79.
Higgs ES, Vita-Finzi C. Prehistoric economies: A territorial approach. In: Papers in economic prehistory: studies by members and associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture. London: Cambridge University Press; 1972. p. 27–36.

80.
LaMotta V, Schiffer M. Behavioral archaeology. Towards a new synthesis. In: Archaeological theory today [Internet]. Cambridge: Polity; 2001. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451

81.
Leone, Mark P. Contemporary archaeology: a guide to theory and contributions. Carbondale, Ill: Feffer & Simons; 1972.

82.
Patrik LE. Is there an archaeological record? Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 1985;8:27–62.

83.
Price BJ. Cultural Materialism: A Theoretical Review. American Antiquity. 1982;47(4):709–41.

84.
Renfrew, Colin, Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects. The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: Duckworth; 1973.

85.
Schiffer, Michael B. Behavioral archaeology. Vol. Studies in archaeology. London: Academic Press; 1976.

86.
Schiffer MB. Is there a ‘Pompeii Premise’ in archaeology? Journal of Anthropological Research. 1985;41(1):18–41.

87.
Schiffer, Michael B. Behavioral archaeology: first principles. Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 1995.

88.
Schiffer, Michael B. Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: University of New Mexico Press; 1987.

89.
Shott MJ. Status and role of formation theory in contemporary archaeological practice. Journal of archaeological research. 1998;6(4):299–329.

90.
Trigger BG. Expanding middle-range theory. Antiquity. 1995;69(264):449–58.

91.
Wylie A. The reaction against analogy. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 1985;8:63–111.

92.
Hodder I. Chapter 1: The problem. In: Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. p. 1–19.

93.
Leone M. Towards a critical archaeology. Current Anthropology. 1987;28(3):283–302.

94.
Shanks M, Tilley CY. Chapter 3: facts and values in archaeology. In: Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 1992. p. 46–67.

95.
Wylie A. The interpretive dilemma. In: Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: essays in the philosophy, history and socio-politics of archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989. p. 18–27.

96.
Review by: Lewis R. Binford. American Antiquity. Vol. 53(No. 4):875–6.

97.
Cowgill GL. Distinguished lecture in archaeology: Beyond criticizing New Archaeology. American Anthropologist, New Series. 1993;95(3):551–73.

98.
Earle et. al. TK. Processual archaeology and the radical critique. Current Anthropology. 1987;28(4):501–38.

99.
Hodder I. Theoretical archaeology: A reactionary view. In: Symbolic and structural archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982. p. 92–121.

100.
Hodder I. Postprocessual archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 1985;8:1–26.

101.
Johnson M. Chapters 6 and 7. In: Archaeological theory: an introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.

102.
Leone M. Symbolic, structural and critical archaeology. In: American archaeology, past and future: a celebration of the Society for American Archaeology, 1935-1985. London: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1986. p. 415–38.

103.
Shanks M, Tilley CY. Archaeology and the politics of theory. In: Social theory and archaeology. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell; 1987. p. 186–208.

104.
Shanks, Michael, Tilley, Christopher Y. Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 1992.

105.
Shanks M. Post-processual archaeology and after. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press; 2008. p. 133–44.

106.
Tilley CY. Ideology and the legitimation of power in the middle Neolithic of southern Sweden. In: Ideology, power and prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984. p. 111–45.

107.
Trigger BG. Distinguished lecture in archaeology: Constraint and freedom - A new synthesis for archaeological explanation. American Anthropologist. 1991;93(3):551–69.

108.
Trigger BG. Archaeology at the Crossroads: What’s New? Annual Review of Anthropology. 1984 Oct;13(1):275–300.

109.
Trigger BG. Chapter 8: Processualism and post-processualism. In: A history of archaeological thought [Internet]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016

110.
Wylie A. On ‘heavily decomposing red herrings’. Scientific method in archaeology and the ladening of evidence with theory. In: Metaarchaeology: reflections by archaeologists and philosophers. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1992. p. 145–57.

111.
Shanks M, Hodder I. Processual, postprocessual and interpretive archaeologies. In: Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 3–29.

112.
Shanks M, Tilley C. Comments on Archaeology into the 1990s. Norwegian Archaeological Review [Internet]. 1989;22(1):12–54. Available from: https://www-tandfonline-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/toc/sarc20/22/1?nav=tocList

113.
Barrett, John C. Fragments from antiquity: an archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Vol. Social archaeology. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell; 1993.

114.
Brück J. Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory. Archaeological Dialogues. 2005 Aug 30;12(01):45–72.

115.
Buchli, Victor, Lucas, Gavin, Cox, Margaret. Archaeologies of the contemporary past. London: Routledge; 2001.

116.
Chippindale C. Ambition, deference, discrepancy, comsumption: the intellectual background to a post-processual archaeology. In: Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993. p. 27–36.

117.
Dobres, Marcia-Anne. Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers; 2000.

118.
Dowson TA. Homosexuality, queer theory and archaeology. In: Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: Leicester University Press; 2000. p. 283–9.

119.
Gero JM, Wright M. Tensions, pluralities and engendering archaeology: An introduction to Women and Prehistory. In: Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Oxford: Blackwell; 1991. p. 3–30.

120.
Hegmon M. Setting theoretical egos aside: Issues and theory in North American archaeology. American Antiquity. 2003;68(2):213–43.

121.
Hodder I. Interpretive archaeology and its role. American Antiquity. 1991;56(1):7–18.

122.
Hodder I. Material practice, symbolism and ideology. In: Theory and practice in archaeology. London: Routledge; 1992. p. 201–12.

123.
Hodder, Ian. Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: Routledge; 1994.

124.
Hodder I, Karlsson H, Olsen B. 40 Years of Theoretical Engagement: A Conversation with Ian Hodder. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 2008 Jun;41(1):26–42.

125.
LaMotta V, Schiffer M. Behavioral archaeology. Towards a new synthesis. In: Archaeological theory today. Rev. and updated ed. Cambridge: Polity; 2012. p. 14–64.

126.
Mackenzie, Iain M. Archaeological theory: progress or posture? Vol. Worldwide archaeology series. Aldershot: Avebury; 1994.

127.
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999.

128.
Preucel RW. The postprocessual condition. Journal of Archaeological Research. 1995;3(2):147–75.

129.
Renfrew C. Towards a cognitive archaeology. In: The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994. p. 3–12.

130.
Shanks M. Post-processual archaeology and after. In: Handbook of archaeological theories [Internet]. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press; 2008. p. 133–44. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780759113602

131.
Tarlow, Sarah, West, Susie. The familiar past?: archaeologies of later historical Britain. London: Routledge; 1999.

132.
Thomas J. Where are we now? Archaeological theory in the 1990s. In: Theory in archaeology: a world perspective. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 343–62.

133.
Thomas, Julian. Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology. London: Routledge; 1996.

134.
Tilley C. Interpreting material culture. In: The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. London: Routledge; 1989. p. 185–94.

135.
Tilley, Christopher Y. Interpretative archaeology. Vol. Explorations in anthropology. New York: Berg; 1992.

136.
Trigger BG. Post‐processual developments in Anglo‐American archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 1991 Jan;24(2):65–76.

137.
Trigger BG. Hyper-relativism, responsibility and the Social Sciences. In: Artifacts & ideas: essays in archaeology. London: Transaction; 2003. p. 113–31.

138.
Trigger BG. Chapter 9 and 10. In: A history of archaeological thought [Internet]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016

139.
Michelle Hegmon. Setting Theoretical Egos Aside: Issues and Theory in North American Archaeology. American Antiquity. 2003;68(2):213–43.

140.
Johnson M. On the nature of theoretical archaeology and archaeological theory. Archaeological Dialogues. 2006;13(2):117–32.

141.
Kristiansen K. Genes versus agents: A discussion of the widening theoretical gap in archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues. 2004;11(2):77–99.

142.
Barrett JC. The material constitution of humanness. Archaeological Dialogues. 2014 Jun;21(01):65–74.

143.
Bentley A, Maschner HDG. Complexity theory. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press; 2008. p. 245–70.

144.
Bintliff, J. L., Pearce, Mark. The death of archaeological theory? [Internet]. Oakville: Oxbow Books; 2011. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvh1dk87

145.
Cochrane, Ethan E., Gardner, Andrew. Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast; 2011.

146.
Funari, Pedro Paulo A., Zarankin, Andrés, Stovel, Emily. Global archaeological theory: contextual voices and contemporary thoughts. London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2005.

147.
Zarankin, Andrés, Salerno, Melisa A., Funari, Pedro Paulo A. Memories from darkness: archaeology of repression and resistance in Latin America [Internet]. Vol. Contributions to global historical archaeology. London: Springer; 2009. Available from: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1007/978-1-4419-0679-3

148.
Gaydarska B. A brief history of TAG. Antiquity. 2009;83(322):1152–62.

149.
Michelle Hegmon. No More Theory Wars: A Response to Moss. American Antiquity. 2005;70(3):588–90.

150.
Hodder I. Introduction: contemporary theoretical debate in archaeology. In: Archaeological theory today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity; 2012. p. 1–14.

151.
Lydon, Jane, Rizvi, Uzma Z. Handbook of postcolonial archaeology [Internet]. Vol. World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2010. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=911816

152.
Knappett, Carl. An archaeology of interaction: network perspectives on material culture and society [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/book/1407

153.
Mizoguchi, Kōji. Archaeology, society and identity in modern Japan. Vol. Cambridge studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.

154.
Madonna L. Moss. Rifts in the Theoretical Landscape of Archaeology in the United States: A Comment on Hegmon and Watkins. American Antiquity. 2005;70(3):581–7.

155.
Olsen B. Symmetical archaeology. In: Archaeological theory today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity; 2012. p. 208–28.

156.
Pauketat TR. Practice and history in archaeology: An emerging paradigm. Anthropological Theory. 2001 Mar 1;1(1):73–98.

157.
Preucel RW, Mrozowski SA. The new pragmatism. In: Contemporary archaeology in theory: the new pragmatism. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 3–49.

158.
Robb J, Pauketat TR. Big histories, human lives: tackling problems of scale in archaeology. Vol. School for Advanced Research advanced seminar series. Santa Fe, N.M.: School for Advanced Research Press; 2013.

159.
Michael Shanks. Symmetrical Archaeology. World Archaeology. 2007;39(4):589–96.

160.
Smith, Laurajane. Archaeological theory and the politics of cultural heritage. London: Routledge; 2004.

161.
Spriggs M. Ethnographic parallels and the denial of history. World Archaeology. 2008;40(4):538–52.

162.
Bruce G. Trigger. Archaeology and Epistemology: Dialoguing across the Darwinian Chasm. American Journal of Archaeology. 1998;102(1):1–34.

163.
Ucko, Peter J., Theoretical Archaeology Group. Theory in archaeology: a world perspective. London: Routledge; 1994.

164.
Watts CM. Relational archaeologies: humans, animals, things. London: Routledge; 2013.

165.
Webmoor T, Witmore CL. Things Are Us! A Commentary on Human/Things Relations under the Banner of a ‘Social’ Archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 2008 Jun;41(1):53–70.

166.
Andrews G, Barrett JC, Lewis JSC. Interpretation not record: The practice of archaeology. Antiquity. 2000;74(285):525–30.

167.
Hodder I. Towards a reflexive method. In: The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999. p. 80–104.

168.
Lucas G. Introduction: archaeology and the field. In: Critical approaches to fieldwork: contemporary and historical archaeological practice. London: Routledge; 2001. p. 1–17.

169.
Roskams S. Future prospects. In: Excavation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. p. 267–90.

170.
Bender B, Tilley CY, Anderson E, Hamilton S. Chapters 1 and 3. In: Stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology [Internet]. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2007. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14615901840004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true

171.
Berggren A, Hodder I. Social practice, method and some problems of field archaeology. American Antiquity. 2003;68(3):421–34.

172.
Binford LR. A consideration of archaeological research design. American Antiquity. 1964;29(4):425–41.

173.
Chadwick A. Post-processualism, professionalization and archaeological methodologies. Towards reflexive and radical practice. Archaeological Dialogues. 2003;10(1):97–117.

174.
Collis, John. Digging up the past: an introduction to archaeological excavation. Stroud: Sutton; 2001.

175.
Conolly J. Catalhoyuk and the archaeological object. In: Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük : by members of the Çatalhöyük team [Internet]. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 2000. p. 51–6. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=533279b1-a506-e811-80cd-005056af4099

176.
Edgeworth, Matt. Acts of discovery: an ethnography of archaeological practice. Vol. BAR international series. Oxford: Archaeopress; 2003.

177.
Edgeworth, Matt. Ethnographies of archaeological practice: cultural encounters, material transformations. Vol. Worlds of archaeology series. Lanham: Altamira Press; 2006.

178.
Gero JM. Archaeological practice and gendered encounters with field data. In: Gender and archaeology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1996. p. 251–80.

179.
Hamilton S. Lost in translation? A comment on the excavation report. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology. 1999 Aug 4;10:1–8.

180.
Hamilton S, Whitehouse R, Brown K, Combes P, Herring E, Thomas MS. Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach. European Journal of Archaeology. 2006 Apr 1;9(1):31–71.

181.
Hassan FA. Beyond the surface: Comments on Hodder’s ‘reflexive excavation methodology’. Antiquity. 1997;71(274):1020–5.

182.
Hodder I. Writing archaeology: site reports in context. In: Theory and practice in archaeology. London: Routledge; 1992. p. 263–74.

183.
Hodder I. Always momentary, fluid and flexible: Towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity. 1997;71(273):691–700.

184.
Jones, Andrew. Archaeological theory and scientific practice. Vol. Topics in contemporary archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.

185.
Lucas G. Understanding the archaeological record [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511845772

186.
Moshenska, Gabriel, Dhanjal, Sarah. Community archaeology: themes, methods and practices [Internet]. Oxford: Oxbow; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1154191

187.
Papaconstantinou, Demetra. Deconstructing context: a critical approach to archaeological practice. Oxford: Oxbow; 2006.

188.
Parker Pearson M, Ramilisonina. Stonehenge for the ancestors: The stones pass on the message. Antiquity. 1998;72(276):308–26.

189.
Scarre G, Coningham R. Appropriating the past: philosophical perspectives on the practice of archaeology [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. Available from: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781139026932

190.
Quirke, Stephen. Hidden hands: Egyptian workforces in Petrie excavation archives, 1880-1924. Vol. Duckworth egyptology. London: Gerald Duckworth; 2010.

191.
Shanks M, McGuire RH. The craft of archaeology. American Antiquity. 1996;61(1):75–88.

192.
Tilley C. Excavation as Theatre. Antiquity. 1989;63(239):275–80.

193.
Parker Pearson M, Ramilisonina. Stonehenge for the ancestors: The stones pass on the message. Antiquity. 1998;72(276):308–26.

194.
Parker Pearson et. al. M. Who was buried at Stonehenge? Antiquity. 2009;83(319):23–39.

195.
Pearson MP. Materializing Stonehenge: The Stonehenge Riverside Project and New Discoveries. Journal of Material Culture. 2006 Jul 1;11(1–2):227–61.

196.
Renfrew C. Monuments, mobilization and social organisation in Neolithic Wessex. In: The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: Duckworth; 1973. p. 539–58.

197.
Atkinson, R. J. C. Stonehenge. Vol. A pelican book. Harmondsworth: Penquin Books in association with Hamish Hamilton; 1960.

198.
Bender B. Theorising landscapes, and the prehistoric landscape of Stonehenge. Man. 1992;27(4):735–55.

199.
Bender, Barbara, Aitken, Paul. Stonehenge: making space. Vol. Materializing culture. Oxford: Berg; 1998.

200.
Bradley, Richard. The significance of monuments: on the shaping of human experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe. London: Routledge; 1998.

201.
Chippindale, Christopher. Stonehenge complete. New and expanded [3rd] ed. [London]: Thames & Hudson; 2004.

202.
Chippindale, Christopher. Who owns Stonehenge? London: Batsford; 1990.

203.
Cleal, Rosamund, Walker, K. E., Montague, R., English Heritage. Stonehenge in its landscape: twentieth-century excavations. Vol. Archaeological report / English Heritage. London: English Heritage; 1995.

204.
Renfrew, Colin, Cunliffe, Barry W., British Academy. Science and Stonehenge. Vol. Proceedings of the British Academy. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy; 1997.

205.
Parker Pearson et. al. M. The age of Stonehenge. Antiquity. 2007;81(313):617–39.

206.
Parker Pearson et. al. M. Stonehenge, its river and its landscape: Unravelling the mysteries of a prehistoric sacred place. Archäologischer Anzeiger: Beiblatt zum Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. 2006;1:237–58.

207.
Richards, Julian C., English Heritage. English Heritage book of Stonehenge. London: B. T. Batsford Ltd./ English Heritage; 1991.

208.
Richards, Julian C., Allen, Mike, English Heritage. The Stonehenge environs project. Vol. Archaeological report. London: Historical Buildings & Monuments Commission for England; 1990.

209.
James S. Roman archaeology: Crisis and revolution. Antiquity [Internet]. 2003;77(295):178–84. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/217561304?accountid=14511

210.
Witcher R, Tolia-Kelly DP, Hingley R. Archaeologies of Landscape: Excavating the Materialities of Hadrian’s Wall. Journal of Material Culture. 2010 Mar 22;15(1):105–28.

211.
Andrén, Anders, Crozier, Alan. Between artifacts and texts: historical archaeology in global perspective. Vol. Contributions to global historical archaeology. London: Plenum Press; 1998.

212.
Dyson, Stephen L. In pursuit of ancient pasts: a history of classical archaeology in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries [Internet]. London: Yale University Press; 2006. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1npzcm

213.
Frere SS. Roman Britain since Haverfield and Richmond. History and Archaeology Review. 1988;3:31–6.

214.
Gardner A. Seeking a material turn: the artefactuality of the Roman Empire. In: TRAC 2002: proceedings of the twelfth annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference which took place at the University of Kent at Canterbury 5-6 April 2002. Oxford: Oxbow Books; 2003. p. 1–13.

215.
Hingley, Richard. Roman officers and English gentlemen: the imperial origins of Roman archaeology. New York: Routledge; 2000.

216.
Hingley R. Hadrian’s Wall in theory: pursuing new agendas. In: Understanding Hadrian’s Wall: papers from a conference held at South Shields, 3rd-5th November 2006, to mark the publication of the 14th edition of the Handbook to the Roman Wall. South Shields: Arbeia Society; 2008. p. 25–8.

217.
Hingley R. ‘The most ancient Boundary between England and Scotland’: Genealogies of the Roman Walls. Classical Receptions Journal. 2010 May 11;2(1):25–43.

218.
Hodder I. Bridging the divide: a commentary on theoretical Roman archaeology. In: Theoretical Roman archaeology: first conference proceedings. Aldershot: Avebury; 1993. p. xiii–xix.

219.
Ian Hodder and Mark Hassall. The Non-Random Spacing of Romano-British Walled Towns. Man. 1971;6(3):391–407.

220.
James S. Writing the Legions: The Development and Future of Roman Military Studies in Britain. Archaeological Journal. 2002 Jan;159(1):1–58.

221.
James, Simon, Millett, Martin, Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, Council for British Archaeology. Britons and Romans: advancing an archaeological agenda. Vol. CBA research report. York: Council for British Archaeology; 2001.

222.
Johnson MH. Rethinking historical archaeology. In: Historical archaeology: back from the edge. New York: Routledge; 1999. p. 23–36.

223.
Moore T. Detribalizing the later prehistoric past: Concepts of tribes in Iron Age and Roman studies. Journal of Social Archaeology. 2011 Oct 1;11(3):334–60.

224.
Nesbitt C, Tolia-Kelly D. Hadrian’s Wall: Embodied archaeologies of the linear monument. Journal of Social Archaeology. 2009 Sep 23;9(3):368–90.

225.
Glenn R. Storey. Archaeology and Roman Society: Integrating Textual and Archaeological Data. Journal of Archaeological Research. 1999;7(3):203–48.

226.
Mason, David J. P., Symonds, Matthew F. A. Frontiers of knowledge: a research framework for Hadrian’s Wall, part of the Frontiers of the Roman Empire World Heritage site. Durham: Durham County Council and Durham University; 2009.

227.
Cooper, Nicholas, Webster, Jane, University of Leicester. Roman imperialism: post-colonial perspectives. Vol. Leicester archaeology monographs. Leicester: School of Archaeological Studies, University of Leicester; 1996.

228.
Wilmott T. Collapse theory and the end of Birdoswald. In: Theoretical Roman archaeology: second conference proceedings. Aldershot: Avebury; 1995. p. 59–69.

229.
Wilmott, Tony, English Heritage. Hadrian’s Wall: archaeological research by English Heritage 1976-2000. Swindon: English Heritage; 2009.

230.
Witcher R. The Fabulous Tales of the Common People, Part 1: Representing Hadrian’s Wall. Public Archaeology. 2010;9(3):126–52.

231.
Greg Woolf. The Present State and Future Scope of Roman Archaeology: A Comment. American Journal of Archaeology. 2004;108(3):417–28.

232.
Tim Ingold. The Temporality of the Landscape. World Archaeology [Internet]. 1993;25(2):152–74. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/124811

233.
Lucas G. Time and Archaeological Event. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2008 Feb;18(01):59–65.

234.
Mytum H. Materiality and memory: an archaeological perspective on the popular adoption of linear time in Britain. Antiquity [Internet]. 2007;81(312):381–96. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/217581355?accountid=14511

235.
Adam B. Perceptions of time. In: Companion encyclopedia of anthropology [Internet]. [New ed.]. London: Routledge; 2002. p. 503–26. Available from: https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490

236.
Adam, Barbara. Timewatch: the social analysis of time. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1995.

237.
G. N. Bailey. Concepts of Time in Quaternary Prehistory. Annual Review of Anthropology [Internet]. 1983;12:165–92. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155645

238.
Bailey G. Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2007 Jun;26(2):198–223.

239.
Barrett, John C. Fragments from antiquity: an archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell; 1993.

240.
Rosen, Ralph Mark, University of Pennsylvania. Time and temporality in the ancient world. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology; 2004.

241.
Bintliff, J. L. The Annales school and archaeology. London: Leicester University Press; 1991.

242.
Borić, Dušan. Archaeology and memory. Oxford: Oxbow Books; 2010.

243.
Bradley, Richard. The past in prehistoric societies. London: Routledge; 2002.

244.
Gardner A. Time and empire in the Roman world. Journal of Social Archaeology. 2012 Jun 1;12(2):145–66.

245.
Gell, Alfred. The anthropology of time: cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Vol. Explorations in anthropology. Oxford: Berg; 1992.

246.
Gosden, Chris. Social being and time. Oxford: Blackwell; 1994.

247.
Hannah, Robert. Time in antiquity. Vol. Sciences of antiquity. Abingdon: Routledge; 2009.

248.
Harding J. Rethinking the Great Divide: Long‐Term Structural History and the Temporality of Event. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 2005 Nov;38(2):88–101.

249.
Holdaway, Simon, Wandsnider, LuAnn. Time in archaeology: time perspectivism revisited [Internet]. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 2008. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=3443820

250.
Karlsson, Håkan. It’s about time: the concept of time in archaeology. Göteborg: Bricoleur; 2001.

251.
Redman, Charles L. Social archeology: beyond subsistence and dating. Vol. Studies in archeology. New York: Academic Press; 1978.

252.
Lucas, Gavin. The archaeology of time. Vol. Themes in archaeology. London: Routledge; 2005.

253.
Nancy D. Munn. The Cultural Anthropology of Time: A Critical Essay. Annual Review of Anthropology [Internet]. 1992;21:93–123. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155982

254.
Murray, Tim, World Archaeological Congress. Time and archaeology. Vol. One world archaeology. London: Routledge; 1999.

255.
Nanni G. Time, empire and resistance in settler-colonial Victoria. Time & Society. 2011 Mar 1;20(1):5–33.

256.
Shanks M, Tilley C. Abstract and Substantial Time. Archaeological Review From Cambridge. 1987;6(1):32–41.

257.
Mackenzie, Iain M. Archaeological theory: progress or posture? Vol. Worldwide archaeology series. Aldershot: Avebury; 1994.

258.
Thomas, Julian. Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology. New York: Routledge; 1996.

259.
Van Dyke, Ruth, Alcock, Susan E. Archaeologies of memory. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2003.

260.
Whittle A, Bayliss A, Healy F. The Timing and Tempo of Change: Examples from the Fourth Millennium cal. BC in Southern England. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2008;18(01):65–70.

261.
David B, Thomas J. Landscape archaeology: Introduction. In: Handbook of landscape archaeology [Internet]. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2008. p. 27–43. Available from: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1

262.
Hamilton S. The ambiguity of landscape: discussing points of relatedness in concepts and methods. In: Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast; 2011. p. 263–80.

263.
Thomas J. Archaeologies of place and landscape. In: Archaeological theory today. Rev. and updated ed. Cambridge: Polity; 2012. p. 165–86.

264.
Tilley CY. Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives. In: A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments. Oxford: Berg; 1994. p. 7–34.

265.
Ashmore W, Knapp AB. Archaeological landscapes: constructed, conceptualised, ideational. In: Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers; 1999. p. 1–30.

266.
Barrett J. The mythical landscapes of the British Iron Age. In: Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers; 1999. p. 253–65.

267.
Bender B. Theorising landscapes, and the prehistoric landscape of Stonehenge. Man. 1992;27(4):735–55.

268.
Bender B, Tilley CY, Anderson E, Hamilton S. Chapters 1 and 3. In: Stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology [Internet]. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2007. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14615901840004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true

269.
Bender B, Hamilton S, Tilley C. Leskernick: Stone Worlds; Alternative Narratives; Nested Landscapes. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 1997;63:147–78.

270.
Brück J. Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory. Archaeological Dialogues. 2005 Aug 30;12(1):45–72.

271.
Thomas, Julian, David, Bruno. Handbook of landscape archaeology [Internet]. Vol. World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2008. Available from: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1

272.
Fleming A. Phenomenology and the Megaliths of Wales: A Dreaming Too Far? Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 1999 May;18(2):119–25.

273.
Fleming A. Post-processual landscape archaeology: A critique. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2006;16(3):267–80.

274.
Gheorghiu D, Nash G. Place as material culture: objects, geographies and the construction of time. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Pub; 2013.

275.
Hamilton et al. S. Quarried away: thinking about landscapes of megalithic construction on Rapa Nui (Easter Island). In: Handbook of landscape archaeology [Internet]. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2008. p. 176–86. Available from: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1

276.
Hamilton S, Whitehouse R, Brown K, Combes P, Herring E, Thomas MS. Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach. European Journal of Archaeology. 2006 Apr 1;9(1):31–71.

277.
Wagstaff, J. Malcolm. Landscape and culture: geographical and archaeological perspectives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1987.

278.
Ingold T. The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology. 1993;25(2):152–74.

279.
Lake M. Viewing space. World Archaeology. 2007;39(1):1–3.

280.
Llobera M. Exploring the topography of mind: GIS, social space and archaeology. Antiquity. 1996;70(269):612–22.

281.
McGlade J. Archaeology and the evolution of cultural landscapes: towards an interdisciplinary agenda. In: The archaeology and anthropology of landscape: shaping your landscape. London: Routledge; 1999. p. 458–82.

282.
Thomas JS. The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape. In: Landscape: politics and perspectives. New York: Berg; 1993. p. 19–48.

283.
Tilley C, Bennett W. An archaeology of super-natural places: the case of West Penwith. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2001;7(2):335–62.

284.
Tilley CY. The powers of rocks: Topography and monument construction on Bodmin Moor. World Archaeology. 1996;28(2):161–76.

285.
Tilley C. Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2004 Oct;14(2):185–203.

286.
Tilley CY. Phenomenological approaches to landscape archaeology. In: Handbook of landscape archaeology [Internet]. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2008. p. 271–6. Available from: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1

287.
Ucko PJ, Layton R. Introduction: gazing on the landscape and encountering the environment. In: The archaeology and anthropology of landscape: shaping your landscape. London: Routledge; 1999. p. 1–20.

288.
Wheatley D. Cumulative viewshed analysis: a GIS-based method for investigating inter-visibility and its archaeological implication. In: Archaeology and geographical information systems: a European perspective. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis; 1995. p. 171–86.

289.
Binford LR. Interassemblage variability: The Mousterian and the functional argument. In: Working at archaeology [Internet]. New York: Academic Press; 1983. p. 131–53. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ffc747cb-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099

290.
Dobres MA, Hoffman CR. Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 1994;1(3):211–58.

291.
Schiffer MB, Skibo JM. The explanation of artifact variability. American Antiquity. 1997;62(1):27–50.

292.
SILLAR B, TITE MS. THE CHALLENGE OF ‘TECHNOLOGICAL CHOICES’FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE APPROACHES IN ARCHAEOLOGY. Archaeometry. 2000 Feb;42(1):2–20.

293.
Arnold DE. Chapters 5, 8 and 9. In: Ceramic theory and cultural process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985.

294.
Binford LR. Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity. 1962;28(2):217–25.

295.
Hastorf, Christine Ann, Conkey, Margaret Wright. The uses of style in archaeology. Vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.

296.
Dobres MA. Social agency and practice: the heart and soul of technology. In: Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers; 2000. p. 127–63.

297.
Hoffman, Christopher R., Dobres, Marcia-Anne. The social dynamics of technology: practice, politics, and world views. London: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1999.

298.
Robb JE, Dobres MA. Agency in archaeology: Paradigm or Platitude? In: Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge; 2000. p. 3–17.

299.
Dunnell RC. Style and function: A fundamental dichotomy. American Antiquity. 1978;43(2):192–202.

300.
Hegmon M. Archaeological research on style. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1992;21:517–36.

301.
Hill JN, Evans RK. A model for classification and typology. In: Models in archaeology. London: Methuen; 1972. p. 231–73.

302.
Hodder I. Material practice, symbolism and ideology. In: Theory and practice in archaeology [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1992. p. 201–12. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6f7f0b8f-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099

303.
Hodder, Ian. Symbols in action: ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982.

304.
Hodder I. Post-modernism, post-structuralism and post-processual archaeology. In: The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. London: Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic; 1989. p. 64–78.

305.
Karlin C, Julien M. Prehistoric technology: a cognitive science? In: The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994. p. 152–63.

306.
Lemonnier P. The study of material culture today: Toward an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1986 Jun;5(2):147–86.

307.
Martinón-Torres M. Chaîne Opératoire: The concept and its aplications within the study of technology. Gallaecia [Internet]. 2002;21:29–43. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=fb4bab91-db3d-ee11-8457-0050f2f06092

308.
Nelson MC. The study of technological organization. Archaeological Method and Theory. 1991;3:57–100.

309.
Pfaffenberger B. Social Anthropology of Technology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1992 Oct;21(1):491–516.

310.
James R. Sackett. The Meaning of Style in Archaeology: A General Model. American Antiquity. 1977;42(3):369–80.

311.
Schlanger N. Mindful technology: unleashing the Chaine operatoire for an archaeology of mind. In: The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994. p. 143–51.

312.
Sigault F. Technology. In: Companion encyclopedia of anthropology [Internet]. [New ed.]. London: Routledge; 2002. p. 420–59. Available from: https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490

313.
Sinclair A. Constellations of knowledge: human agency and material affordance in lithic technology. In: Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge; 2000. p. 196–212.

314.
Tilley, Christopher Y. Metaphor and material culture. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers; 1999.

315.
van der Leeuw S. Dust to dust: a transformational view of the ceramic cycle. In: The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam; 1984. p. 709–33.

316.
Wiessner P. Style and changing relations between the individual and society. In: The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. London: Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic; 1989. p. 56–63.

317.
Wobst HM. Stylistic behavior ad information exchange. In: For the director: research essays in honor of James B Griffin. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan; 1977. p. 317–42.

318.
Wobst HM. Style in archaeology or archaeologists in style. In: Material meanings: critical approaches to the interpretation of material culture. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 1999. p. 118–32.

319.
Chris Gosden. What Do Objects Want? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 2005;12(3):193–211.

320.
Robb JE. The archaeology of symbols. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1998;27:329–46.

321.
Sillar B. The Social Agency of Things? Animism and Materiality in the Andes. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2009 Oct 1;19(03):367–77.

322.
Bentley A. ‘Style versus function’ 30 years on. In: Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast; 2011. p. 83–104.

323.
Chilton, Elizabeth S. Material meanings: critical approaches to the interpretation of material culture. Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 1999.

324.
Cochrane EE. Style, function and systematic empiricism: the conflation of process and pattern. In: Style and function: conceptual issues in evolutionary archaeology. London: Bergin & Garvey; 2001. p. 183–202.

325.
Renfrew, Colin, DeMarrais, Elizabeth, Gosden, Chris. Rethinking materiality: the engagement of mind with the material world. Vol. McDonald Institute monographs. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 2004.

326.
Ferguson L. Struggling with pots in colonial South Carolina. In: The archaeology of inequality. Oxford: Blackwell; 1991. p. 28–39.

327.
Gosden C, Marshall Y. The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology. 1999;31(2):169–78.

328.
Hodder I. Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2011;17(1):154–77.

329.
Hodder I. Entangled: an archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.

330.
Ingold T. Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues. 2007;14(1):1–16.

331.
Thomas, Julian, Jorge, Vítor Oliveira, Theoretical Archaeology Group (England). Overcoming the modern invention of material culture: proceedings of the TAG session, Exeter 2006. Vol. Journal of Iberian archaeology. Porto: ADECAP; 2007.

332.
Knappett C. Photographs, Skeuomorphs and Marionettes: Some Thoughts on Mind, Agency and Object. Journal of Material Culture. 2002 Mar 1;7(1):97–117.

333.
Knappett, Carl. Thinking through material culture: an interdisciplinary perspective. Vol. Archaeology, culture, and society. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2005.

334.
Knappet C. Materiality. In: Archaeological theory today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity; 2012. p. 188–207.

335.
Knappett, Carl, Malafouris, Lambros. Material agency: towards a non-anthropocentric approach. New York: Springer; 2008.

336.
Layton R. Structuralism and semiotics. In: Handbook of material culture [Internet]. London: SAGE; 2006. p. 29–42. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781446206430

337.
Meskell, Lynn. Object worlds in ancient Egypt: material biographies past and present. Vol. Materializing culture. Oxford: Berg; 2004.

338.
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of materiality. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2006.

339.
Miller D. Artefacts and the meaning of things. In: Companion encyclopedia of anthropology [Internet]. [New ed.]. London: Routledge; 2002. p. 396–419. Available from: https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490

340.
Miller, Daniel. Materiality. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press; 2005.

341.
O’Brien MJ. Style, function, transmission: an introduction. In: Style, function, transmission: evolutionary archaeological perspectives. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 2003. p. 1–32.

342.
Olsen B. Material culture after text: re‐membering things. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 2003 Oct;36(2):87–104.

343.
Olsen B. Archaeology: the discipline of things. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2012.

344.
Preucel R, Bauer A. Archaeological Pragmatics. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 2001;34(2):85–96.

345.
Preucel, Robert W. Archaeological semiotics. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell; 2006.

346.
Sørensen MLS. Reading Dress: The Construction of Social Categories and Identities in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European Archaeology. 1997;5(1):93–114.

347.
Taylor T. Materiality. In: Handbook of archaeological theories [Internet]. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press; 2008. p. 297–320. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1

348.
Thomas J. Culture and identity. In: Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. London: Routledge; 1999. p. 431–69.

349.
Thomas, Julian. Archaeology and modernity. London: Routledge; 2004.

350.
Bentley, R. Alexander, Maschner, Herbert D. G., Chippindale, Christopher. Handbook of archaeological theories [Internet]. Lanham, Md: AltaMira Press; 2008. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780759113602

351.
Steven Mithen. Understanding Mind and Culture: Evolutionary Psychology or Social Anthropology? Anthropology Today [Internet]. 1995;11(6):3–7. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2783517?origin=crossref

352.
Shennan, Stephen. Genes, memes and human history: Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution. London: Thames & Hudson; 2002.

353.
Bettinger RL. Hunter-gatherers: archaeological and evolutionary theory. Vol. Interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology. New York: Plenum Press; 1991.

354.
Boone JL, Smith EA. Is It Evolution Yet? A Critique of Evolutionary Archaeology. Current Anthropology. 1998 Jun;39(S1):S141–74.

355.
Cochrane, Ethan E., Gardner, Andrew. Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast; 2011.

356.
Currie TE, Mace R. Mode and tempo in the evolution of socio-political organization: reconciling ‘Darwinian’ and ‘Spencerian’ evolutionary approaches in anthropology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2011 Feb 28;366(1567):1108–17.

357.
Kristiansen K. Genes versus agents. A discussion of the widening theoretical gap in archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues. 2004 Dec;11(2):77–99.

358.
Mithen SJ. The prehistory of the mind: a search for the origins of art, religion and science. London: Thames & Hudson; 1996.

359.
Mithen SJ. Thoughtful foragers: a study of prehistoric decision making. Vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press; 1990.

360.
Richerson, Peter J., Boyd, Robert. Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2005.

361.
Rowley-Conwy P, Layton R, Panter-Brick C. Hunter-gatherers: an interdisciplinary perspective. Vol. The Biosocial Society symposium series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.

362.
Winterhalder B, Kennett DJ, Grote MN, Bartruff J. Ideal free settlement of California’s Northern Channel Islands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2010 Dec;29(4):469–90.

363.
Alex Mesoudi, Andrew Whiten and Kevin N. Laland. Perspective: Is Human Cultural Evolution Darwinian? Evidence Reviewed from the Perspective of ‘The Origin of Species’. Evolution [Internet]. 2004;58(1):1–11. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3449291

364.
Shennan S. Descent with modification and the archaeological record. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2011 Apr 12;366(1567):1070–9.

365.
Shennan S. Evolution in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2008 Oct;37(1):75–91.

366.
Andersson C. Paleolithic Punctuations and Equilibria: Did Retention Rather Than Invention Limit Technological Evolution? PaleoAnthropology [Internet]. 2011;243–59. Available from: http://www.paleoanthro.org/journal/volumes/2011/

367.
Aunger, Robert. Darwinizing culture: the status of memetics as a science. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.

368.
R. Alexander Bentley, Matthew W. Hahn and Stephen J. Shennan. Random Drift and Culture Change. Proceedings: Biological Sciences [Internet]. 2004;271(1547):1443–50. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4142981

369.
Maschner, Herbert D. G., Chippindale, Christopher, Bentley, R. Alexander. Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press; 2008.

370.
Boyd, Robert, Richerson, Peter J. Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1985.

371.
Mace, Ruth, Holden, Clare Janaki, Shennan, Stephen. The evolution of cultural diversity: a phylogenetic approach. London: UCL Press; 2005.

372.
Coward F, Shennan S, Colledge S, Conolly J, Collard M. The spread of Neolithic plant economies from the Near East to northwest Europe: a phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2008 Jan;35(1):42–56.

373.
Lipo, Carl P., Society for American Archaeology. Mapping our ancestors: phylogenetic approaches in anthropology and prehistory. New Brunswick, N.J.: Aldine Transaction; 2006.

374.
Shennan, Stephen. Pattern and process in cultural evolution. Vol. Origins of human behavior and culture. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2009.

375.
Lyman RL, O’Brien MJ. Measuring and Explaining Change in Artifact Variation with Clade-Diversity Diagrams. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2000 Mar;19(1):39–74.

376.
Powell A, Shennan S, Thomas MG. Late Pleistocene Demography and the Appearance of Modern Human Behavior. Science. 2009 Jun 5;324(5932):1298–301.

377.
Richerson PJ, Boyd R. Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2005.

378.
Shennan, Stephen. Genes, memes and human history: Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution. London: Thames & Hudson; 2002.

379.
Dobres MA, Robb JE. Agency in archaeology: Paradigm or platitude? In: Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge; 2000. p. 3–17.

380.
Dornan JL. Agency and archaeology: Past, present and future directions. Journal of archaeological method and theory. 2002;9(4):303–29.

381.
Gardner A. Agency. In: Handbook of archaeological theories [Internet]. Lanham, Md: AltaMira Press; 2008. p. 95–108. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1

382.
Barrett JC. Agency, the duality of structure and the problem of the archaeological record. In: Archaeological theory today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity; 2012. p. 141–64.

383.
Brumfiel EM. On the archaeology of choice: agency studies as a research strategem. In: Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge; 2000. p. 249–55.

384.
Cornell P, Fahlander F. Microarchaeology, materiality and social practice. Current Swedish Archaeology. 2002;10:21–38.

385.
Dobres, Marcia-Anne. Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers; 2000.

386.
Englehardt J. Agency in ancient writing. Boulder: University Press of Colorado; 2013.

387.
Fewster KJ. The Role of Agency and Material Culture in Remembering and Forgetting: An Ethnoarchaeological Case Study from Central Spain. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology. 2006 Jun 30;20(1).

388.
Flannery KV. Process and Agency in Early State Formation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 1999;9(1):3–21.

389.
Gardner, Andrew. An archaeology of identity: soldiers and society in late Roman Britain [Internet]. Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2007. Available from: https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9781315435091/archaeology-identity-andrew-gardner

390.
Gardner A. Action and structure in interpretive archaeologies. In: Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast; 2011. p. 63–82.

391.
Graves-Brown P. In search of the watchmaker: attribution of agency in natural and cultural selection. In: Darwinian archaeologies. London: Plenum Press; 1996. p. 165–81.

392.
Johnson MH. Conceptions of agency in archaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1989 Jun;8(2):189–211.

393.
Knapp AB, van Dommelen P. Past Practices: Rethinking Individuals and Agents in Archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2008 Feb 15;18(01):15–34.

394.
Kent G. Lightfoot, Antoinette Martinez and Ann M. Schiff. Daily Practice and Material Culture in Pluralistic Social Settings: An Archaeological Study of Culture Change and Persistence from Fort Ross, California. American Antiquity. 1998;63(2):199–222.

395.
MacGregor G. Post-processual archaeology: the hidden agenda of the secret agent. In: Archaeological theory: progress or posture? Aldershot: Avebury; 1994. p. 79–91.

396.
Bentley RA, Maschner HDG, Chippindale C. R. McGuire. In: Handbook of archaeological theories [Internet]. Lanham, Md: AltaMira Press; 2008. p. 73–93. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1

397.
Meskell, Lynn, Joyce, Rosemary A. Embodied lives: figuring ancient Maya and Egyptian experience. London: Routledge; 2003.

398.
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999.

399.
Miller D, Tilley CY. Ideology, power and prehistory: An introduction. In: Ideology, power and prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984. p. 1–15.

400.
Pauketat TR. Practice and history in archaeology: An emerging paradigm. Anthropological Theory. 2001 Mar 1;1(1):73–98.

401.
Patterson T. Social archaeology and Marxist social thought. In: A companion to social archaeology [Internet]. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd; 2004. p. 66–81. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605

402.
Shanks M, Tilley CY. The individual and the social. In: Social theory and archaeology. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell; 1987. p. 61–78.

403.
Shennan SJ. An evolutionary perspective on the goals of archaeology. In: Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast; 2011. p. 325–44.

404.
Thomas J. Humanism and the individual: chapter 6. In: Archaeology and modernity. London: Routledge; 2004. p. 119–48.

405.
Strauss C. Blaming for Columbine. Current Anthropology. 2007 Dec;48(6):807–32.

406.
Bruce G. Trigger. Marxism in Contemporary Western Archaeology. Archaeological Method and Theory. 1993;5:159–200.

407.
VanPool TL, VanPool CS. Agency and evolution: the role of intended and unintended consequences of action. In: Essential tensions in archaeological method and theory. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 2003. p. 89–113.

408.
Brück J. Monuments, power and personhood in the British Neolithic. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2001 Dec;7(4):649–67.

409.
Fowler C. Personhood and Social Relations in the British Neolithic with a Study from the Isle of Man. Journal of Material Culture. 2001 Jul 1;6(2):137–63.

410.
Jones S. Discourses of identity in the interpretation of the past. In: Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: Leicester University Press; 2000. p. 445–57.

411.
Joyce RA. Archaeology of the Body. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2005 Oct;34(1):139–58.

412.
Carrithers M, Collins S, Lukes S, editors. The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985.

413.
Casella, Eleanor Conlin, Fowler, Chris. The archaeology of plural and changing identities: beyond identification. London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum; 2005.

414.
Díaz-Andreu García, Margarita. The archaeology of identity: approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religion. London: Routledge; 2005.

415.
Geoff Emberling. Ethnicity in Complex Societies: Archaeological Perspectives. Journal of Archaeological Research. 1997;5(4):295–344.

416.
Fowler, Chris. The archaeology of personhood: an anthropological approach. Vol. Themes in archaeology. London: Routledge; 2004.

417.
Fowler C. The individual, the subject and archaeological interpretation: reading Luce Irigaray and Judith Butler. In: Philosophy and archaeological practice: perspectives for the 21st century. Göteborg: Bricoleur Press; 2000. p. 107–22.

418.
Gardner, Andrew. An archaeology of identity: soldiers and society in late Roman Britain [Internet]. Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2007. Available from: https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9781315435091/archaeology-identity-andrew-gardner

419.
Hales, Shelley, Hodos, Tamar. Material culture and social identities in the ancient world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

420.
Jones, S. The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. London: Routledge; 1997.

421.
Jones S. Ethnicity: theoretical approaches, methodological implications. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press; 2008. p. 321–33.

422.
Knapp AB, Meskell L. Bodies of Evidence on Prehistoric Cyprus. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 1997;7(02):183–204.

423.
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt. Vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999.

424.
Meskell, Lynn, Joyce, Rosemary A. Embodied lives: figuring ancient Maya and Egyptian experience. London: Routledge; 2003.

425.
Meskell L. Archaeologies of identity. In: Archaeological theory today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity; 2012. p. 187–213.

426.
Pluciennik, Mark, Tarlow, Sarah, Hamilakis, Yannis. Thinking through the body: archaeologies of corporeality. London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002.

427.
Rautman, Alison E., Gender and Archaeology Conference. Reading the body: representations and remains in the archaeological record. Vol. Regendering the past. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2000.

428.
Ross, Jennifer C., Steadman, Sharon R. Agency and identity in the ancient Near East: new paths forward. Vol. Approaches to anthropological archaeology. London: Equinox; 2010.

429.
Smith, Stuart Tyson. Wretched Kush: ethnic identities and boudaries in Egypt’s Nubian empire. London: Routledge; 2003.

430.
Sofaer, Joanna R. The body as material culture: a theoretical osteoarchaeology [Internet]. Vol. Topics in contemporary archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816666

431.
Stark, Miriam T. The archaeology of social boundaries. Vol. Smithsonian series in archaeological inquiry. London: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1998.

432.
Thomas J. Culture and identity. In: Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. London: Routledge; 1999. p. 431–69.

433.
Thomas J. Chapter 6. In: Archaeology and modernity. London: Routledge; 2004.

434.
Whitehouse R. Cultural and biological approaches to the body in archaeology: can they be reconciled?" . In: Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast; 2011. p. 227–44.

435.
Whitley J. Homer’s Entangled Objects: Narrative, Agency and Personhood In and Out of Iron Age Texts. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2013 Oct;23(03):395–416.

436.
Wilkinson D. The Emperor’s New Body: Personhood, Ontology and the Inka Sovereign. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2013 Oct;23(03):417–32.

437.
Yates T. Frameworks for an archaeology of the body. In: Interpretative archaeology. New York: Berg; 1992. p. 31–72.

438.
Conkey MW, Gero JM. Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1997 Oct 21;26(1):411–37.

439.
Whitehouse R. Feminism and archaeology: An awkward relationship. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology. 1998;9:1–7.

440.
Wylie A. The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: Recent archaeological research on gender. American Antiquity. 1992;57(1):15–35.

441.
Carr, Lydia. Tessa Verney Wheeler: women and archaeology before World War Two. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

442.
Margaret W. Conkey. Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 2007;14(3):285–310.

443.
Conkey MW, Spector JD. Archaeology and the Study of Gender. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 1984;7:1–38.

444.
Dowson TA. Homosexuality, queer theory and archaeology. In: Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: Leicester University Press; 2000. p. 283–9.

445.
Engelstad E. Images of power and contradiction: Feminist theory and post-processual archaeology. Antiquity. 1991;65(248):502–14.

446.
Geller PL. Identity and Difference: Complicating Gender in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2009 Oct;38(1):65–81.

447.
Gilchrist R. Archaeology and the life course: a time and age for gender. In: A companion to social archaeology [Internet]. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd; 2004. p. 142–60. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605

448.
Gilchrist R. Women’s archaeology? Political feminism, gender theory and historical revision. Antiquity. 1991;65(248):495–501.

449.
Hamilton S, Whitehouse R, Wright KI. Introduction and section 1. In: Archaeology and women: ancient & modern issues. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2007. p. 13–40.

450.
Hastorf C. Gender, space and food in prehistory. In: Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Oxford: Blackwell; 1991. p. 132–59.

451.
Hays-Gilpin K. Gender. In: Handbook of archaeological theories [Internet]. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press; 2008. p. 335–49. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1

452.
Hill E. Gender-informed archaeology: The priority of definition, the use of analogy, and the multivariate approach. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 1998 Mar;5(1):99–128.

453.
Joyce R. Embodied subjectivity: gender, feminity, masculinity, sexuality. In: A companion to social archaeology [Internet]. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd; 2004. p. 82–95. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605

454.
Moore HL. Bodies on the move: gender, power and material culture. In: A passion for difference: essays in anthropology and gender. Cambridge: Polity; 1994. p. 71–85.

455.
Nelson, Sarah M. Handbook of gender in archaeology. Vol. Gender and archaeology series. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press; 2006.

456.
Pope R. Processual archaeology and gender politics. The loss of innocence. Archaeological Dialogues. 2011;18(1):59–86.

457.
Pope R. Processual archaeology and gender politics. The loss of innocence. Archaeological Dialogues. 2011 Apr 21;18(01):59–86.

458.
Rega E. Age, gender and biological reality in the Early Bronze Age cemetery at Mokrin. In: Invisible people and processes: writing gender and childhood into European archaeology. London: Leicester University Press; 1996. p. 229–47.

459.
Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig. Gender archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2000.

460.
Spector J. What this awl means: towards a feminist archaeology. In: Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Oxford: Blackwell; 1991. p. 388–406.

461.
Treherne P. The warrior’s beauty: the masculine body and self-identity in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European archaeology: journal of the European Association of Archaeologists. 1995;3(1):105–44.

462.
Tringham R. Engendered places in prehistory. In: Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: Leicester University Press; 2000. p. 329–57.

463.
Wylie A. Gender theory and the archaeological record: Why is there no archaeology of gender? In: Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Oxford: Blackwell; 1991. p. 31–54.

464.
Alison Wylie. Doing Archaeology as a Feminist: Introduction. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 2007;14(3):209–16.

465.
Kohl PL. Nationalism and archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1998 Oct 21;27(1):223–46.

466.
Tilley CY. Archaeology as socio-political action in the present. In: Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: essays in the philosophy, history and socio-politics of archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989. p. 104–16.

467.
Trigger BG. Alternative archaeologies: Nationalist, colonialist, imperialist. Man. 1984;19(3):355–70.

468.
Arnold B. The past as propaganda: Totalitarian archaeology in Nazi Germany. Antiquity. 1990;64(244):464–78.

469.
Banks, Iain, O’Sullivan, Jerry, Atkinson, John A., Scottish Archaeological Forum. Nationalism and archaeology: Scottish Archaeological Forum. Glasgow: Cruithne Press; 1996.

470.
Reinhard Bernbeck and Susan Pollock. Ayodhya, Archaeology, and Identity. Current Anthropology. 1996;37(1):S138–42.

471.
Bernbeck R, Pollock S. The political economy of archaeological practice and the production of heritage in the Middle East. In: A companion to social archaeology [Internet]. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd; 2004. p. 335–52. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605

472.
Colwell-Chanthaphonh C. Archaeology and indigenous collaboration. In: Archaeological theory today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity; 2012. p. 267–91.

473.
Fagan, Garrett G. Archaeological fantasies: how pseudoarchaeology misrepresents the past and misleads the public. London: Routledge; 2006.

474.
Fowler D. Archaeological ethics in context and practice. In: Handbook of archaeological theories [Internet]. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press; 2008. p. 409–22. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1

475.
Gosden C. Postcolonial archaeology. Issues of culture, identity and knowledge. In: Archaeological theory today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity; 2012. p. 241–61.

476.
Gosden C. The past and foreign countries: colonial and post-colonial archaeology and anthropology. In: A companion to social archaeology [Internet]. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd; 2004. p. 161–78. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605

477.
James, Simon. The Atlantic Celts: ancient people or modern invention? London: British Museum Press; 1999.

478.
Kohl PL, Fawcett C. Archaeology in the service of the state: theoretical considerations. In: Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995. p. 3–18.

479.
Kohl PL. Nationalism and Archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1998 Oct 21;27(1):223–46.

480.
Layton, Robert. Who needs the past?: indigenous values and archaeology. Vol. One world archaeology. London: Routledge; 1994.

481.
Leone et al. M. Can an African-American historical archaeology be an alternative voice? In: Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 110–24.

482.
Leone, Mark P. The archaeology of liberty in an American capital: excavations in Annapolis [Internet]. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2005. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1ppc5g

483.
Leone M, Preucel R. Archaeology in a democratic society: a critical perspective. In: Quandaries and quests: visions of archaeology’s future. [Carbondale, Ill.]: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale; 1992. p. 115–35.

484.
McGuire R. Contested pasts: archaeology and Native Americans. In: A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd; 2004. p. 374–95.

485.
McGuire, Randall H. Archaeology as political action. Vol. California series in public anthropology. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2008.

486.
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeology under fire: nationalism, politics and heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. London: Routledge; 1998.

487.
Meskell L. The Intersections of Identity and Politics in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2002 Oct;31(1):279–301.

488.
Murray T. Communication and the importance of disciplinary communities: who owns the past? In: Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993. p. 105–16.

489.
Pearson MP, Schadla-Hall T, Moshenska G. Resolving the Human Remains Crisis in British Archaeology. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology. 2011;21:5–9.

490.
Ratnagar S. Archaeology at the Heart of a Political Confrontation: The Case of Ayodhya. Current Anthropology. 2004 Apr;45(2):239–59.

491.
Reid, Donald M. Whose pharaohs?: archaeology, museums, and Egyptian national identity from Napoleon to World War I. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 2002.

492.
Saitta, Dean J. The archaeology of collective action. Vol. The American experience in archaeological perspective. Gainesville: University Press of Florida; 2007.

493.
Smith, Laurajane. Archaeological theory and the politics of cultural heritage. London: Routledge; 2004.

494.
Stottman, M. Jay. Archaeologists as activists: can archaeologists change the world? Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press; 2010.

495.
Tarlow S, Stutz LN. Can an archaeologist be a public intellectual? Archaeological Dialogues. 2013 Jun;20(01):1–5.

496.
Thomas, David Hurst. Skull wars: Kennewick man, archaeology, and the battle for Native American identity. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books; 2000.

497.
Trigger BG. Archaeology and the image of the American Indian. American Antiquity. 1980;45(4):662–76.

498.
Wylie A. The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: Recent archaeological research on gender. American Antiquity. 1992;57(1):15–35.

499.
Wylie A. Alternative histories. Epistemic disunity and political integrity. In: Making alternative histories: the practice of archaeology and history in non-Western settings. Santa Fe, N.M: School of American Research Press; 1995. p. 255–72.

500.
Zimmerman, Larry J., Vitelli, Karen D., Hollowell-Zimmer, Julie. Ethical issues in archaeology. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press; 2003.

501.
Clarke DL. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity. 1973;47(185):6–18.

502.
Ian Hodder. Postprocessual Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 1985;8:1–26.

503.
Tilley C. Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2004 Oct;14(2):185–203.

504.
Fisher P, Farrelly C, Maddocks A, Ruggles C. Spatial Analysis of Visible Areas from the Bronze Age Cairns of Mull. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1997 Jul;24(7):581–92.

505.
Flannery KV. Process and Agency in Early State Formation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 1999;9(1):3–21.

506.
Joyce RA. Unintended Consequences? Monumentality as a Novel Experience in Formative Mesoamerica. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 2004;11(1):5–29.

507.
Megaw JVS, Megaw MR. Ancient Celts and Modern Ethnicity. Antiquity. 1996;70(267):175–81.

508.
James S. Celts, politics and motivation in archaeology. Antiquity. 1998;72(275):200–9.

509.
VanPool CS, VanPool TL. The scientific nature of post-processualism. American Antiquity. 1999;64(1):33–53.

510.
Arnold III PJ, Wilkens BS. On the VanPools’ ‘scientific’ post-processualism. American Antiquity. 2001;66(2):361–6.

511.
Hutson SR. Synergy through disunity, science as social practice: Comments on VanPool and VanPool. American Antiquity. 2001;66(2):349–60.

512.
VanPool TL, VanPool CS. Postprocessualism and the nature of science: A response to comments by Hutson and Arnold and Wilkens. American Antiquity. 2001;66(2):367–75.

513.
Hodder I. ‘Always momentary, fluid and flexible’: Towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity. 1997;71(273):691–700.

514.
Hassan F. Beyond the surface: Comments on Hodder’s reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity. 1997;71(274):1020–5.

515.
Hodder I. Whose rationality? A response to Fekri Hassan. Antiquity. 1998;72(275):213–7.

516.
Bamforth DB. Evidence and metaphor in evolutionary archaeology. American Antiquity. 2002;67(3):435–52.

517.
O’Brien MJ, Lyman RL, Leonard RD. What is evolution? A response to Bamforth. American Antiquity. 2003;68(3):573–80.

518.
Bamforth DB. What is archaeology? (Or confusion, sound and fury, signifying....). American Antiquity. 2003;68(3):581–4.

Bibliography for ARCL2028: Current Issues in Archaeological Theory BETA