Bibliography for ARCL2028: Current Issues in Archaeological Theory

Adam, B. ‘Perceptions of Time’. Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology. [New ed.]. Routledge world reference. London: Routledge, 2002. 503–526. Web. <https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490>.

Adam, Barbara. Timewatch: The Social Analysis of Time. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995. Print.

Alex Mesoudi, Andrew Whiten and Kevin N. Laland. ‘Perspective: Is Human Cultural Evolution Darwinian? Evidence Reviewed from the Perspective of “The Origin of Species”’. Evolution 58.1 (2004): 1–11. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3449291>.

Alison Wylie. ‘Doing Archaeology as a Feminist: Introduction’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 14.3 (2007): 209–216. Print.

Andersson, Claes. ‘Paleolithic Punctuations and Equilibria: Did Retention Rather Than Invention Limit Technological Evolution?’ PaleoAnthropology (2011): 243–259. Web. <http://www.paleoanthro.org/journal/volumes/2011/>.

Andrén, Anders and Crozier, Alan. Between Artifacts and Texts: Historical Archaeology in Global Perspective. Contributions to global historical archaeology. London: Plenum Press, 1998. Print.

Andrews, G. , John C. Barrett, and John S. C. Lewis. ‘Interpretation Not Record: The Practice of Archaeology’. Antiquity 74.285 (2000): 525–530. Print.

Arnold, B. ‘The Past as Propaganda: Totalitarian Archaeology in Nazi Germany’. Antiquity 64.244 (1990): 464–478. Print.

Arnold, Dean E. ‘Chapters 5, 8 and 9’. Ceramic Theory and Cultural Process. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. Print.

Arnold III, Philip J., and Brian S. Wilkens. ‘On the VanPools’ “scientific” Post-Processualism’. American Antiquity 66.2 (2001): 361–366. Print.

Arnold, P. ‘Back to Basics: The Middle-Range Program as Pragmatic Archaeology’. Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2003. 55–66. Print.

Ashmore, Wendy, and Arthur Bernard Knapp. ‘Archaeological Landscapes: Constructed, Conceptualised, Ideational’. Archaeologies of Landscape: Contemporary Perspectives. Social archaeology. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers, 1999. 1–30. Print.

Atkinson, R. J. C. Stonehenge. A pelican book. Harmondsworth: Penquin Books in association with Hamish Hamilton, 1960. Print.

Aunger, Robert. Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Print.

Bailey, Geoff. ‘Time Perspectives, Palimpsests and the Archaeology of Time’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 26.2 (2007): 198–223. Web.

Bamforth, D. B. ‘Evidence and Metaphor in Evolutionary Archaeology’. American Antiquity 67.3 (2002): 435–452. Print.

---. ‘What Is Archaeology? (Or Confusion, Sound and Fury, Signifying....)’. American Antiquity 68.3 (2003): 581–584. Print.

Banks, Iain et al. Nationalism and Archaeology: Scottish Archaeological Forum. Glasgow: Cruithne Press, 1996. Print.

Barrett , J.C. ‘Agency, the Duality of Structure and the Problem of the Archaeological Record’. Archaeological Theory Today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2012. 141–164. Print.

Barrett, John. ‘The Mythical Landscapes of the British Iron Age’. Archaeologies of Landscape: Contemporary Perspectives. Social archaeology. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers, 1999. 253–265. Print.

Barrett, John C. Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Social archaeology. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell, 1993. Print.

---. Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993. Print.

Barrett, John C. ‘The Material Constitution of Humanness’. Archaeological Dialogues 21.01 (2014): 65–74. Web.

Bender, Barbara et al. ‘Chapters 1 and 3’. Stone Worlds: Narrative and Reflexivity in Landscape Archaeology. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, 2007. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14615901840004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true>.

---. ‘Chapters 1 and 3’. Stone Worlds: Narrative and Reflexivity in Landscape Archaeology. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, 2007. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14615901840004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true>.

Bender, Barbara . ‘Theorising Landscapes, and the Prehistoric Landscape of Stonehenge’. Man 27.4 (1992): 735–755. Print.

---. ‘Theorising Landscapes, and the Prehistoric Landscape of Stonehenge’. Man 27.4 (1992): 735–755. Print.

Bender, Barbara and Aitken, Paul. Stonehenge: Making Space. Materializing culture. Oxford: Berg, 1998. Print.

Bender, Barbara, Sue Hamilton, and Christopher Tilley. ‘Leskernick: Stone Worlds; Alternative Narratives; Nested Landscapes.’ Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 63 (1997): 147–178. Web.

Bentley , A. ‘“Style versus Function” 30 Years On’. Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast, 2011. 83–104. Print.

Bentley, A., and H. D. G Maschner. ‘Complexity Theory’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2008. 245–270. Print.

Bentley, R., and Maschner Alexander. ‘Introduction on Archaeological Theories’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2008. Print.

Bentley, R. Alexander, Maschner, Herbert D. G., and Chippindale, Christopher. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. Lanham, Md: AltaMira Press, 2008. Web. <https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780759113602>.

Bentley, R. Alexander, Herbert D. G. Maschner, and Christopher Chippindale. ‘R. McGuire’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. Lanham, Md: AltaMira Press, 2008. 73–93. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1>.

Berggren, A., and Ian Hodder. ‘Social Practice, Method and Some Problems of Field Archaeology’. American Antiquity 68.3 (2003): 421–434. Print.

Bernbeck, R., and S. Pollock. ‘The Political Economy of Archaeological Practice and the Production of Heritage in the Middle East’. A Companion to Social Archaeology. Social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd, 2004. 335–352. Web. <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605>.

Bettinger, Robert L. Hunter-Gatherers: Archaeological and Evolutionary Theory. Interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology. New York: Plenum Press, 1991. Print.

Binford, Lewis R. ‘General Introduction’. For Theory Building in Archaeology: Essays on Faunal Remains, Aquatic Resources, Spatial Analysis and Systemic Modeling. Studies in archeology. London: Academic Press, 1977. 1–10. Print.

---. ‘Interassemblage Variability: The Mousterian and the Functional Argument’. Working at Archaeology. Studies in archeology. New York: Academic Press, 1983. 131–153. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ffc747cb-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Binford, Lewis R. . ‘A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design’. American Antiquity 29.4 (1964): 425–441. Print.

---. ‘A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design’. American Antiquity 29.4 (1964): 425–441. Print.

---. ‘Archaeological Perspectives’. New Perspectives in Archeology. Chicago: Aldine, 1968. 5–32. Print.

---. ‘Archaeology as Anthropology’. American Antiquity 28.2 (1962): 217–225. Print.

---. ‘Archaeology as Anthropology’. American Antiquity 28.2 (1962): 217–225. Print.

---. ‘Behavioural Archaeological and the “Pompeii Premise” ’. Journal of Anthropological Research 37.3 (1981): 195–208. Print.

---. ‘Relics to Artifacts and Monuments to Assemblages: Changing Conceptual Frameworks’. Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths. Studies in archaeology. London: Academic Press, 1981. 3–20. Print.

Binford, Lewis Roberts. Constructing Frames of Reference: An Analytical Method for Archaeological Theory Building Using Hunter-Gatherer and Environmental Data Sets. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001. Print.

Bintliff, J. L. The Annales School and Archaeology. London: Leicester University Press, 1991. Print.

Bintliff, J. L. and Pearce, Mark. The Death of Archaeological Theory? Oakville: Oxbow Books, 2011. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvh1dk87>.

Boone, James L., and Eric Alden Smith. ‘Is It Evolution Yet? A Critique of Evolutionary Archaeology’. Current Anthropology 39.S1 (1998): S141–S174. Web.

Borić, Dušan. Archaeology and Memory. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2010. Print.

Boyd, Robert and Richerson, Peter J. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985. Print.

Bradley, Richard. The Past in Prehistoric Societies. London: Routledge, 2002. Print.

---. The Significance of Monuments: On the Shaping of Human Experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe. London: Routledge, 1998. Print.

Bruce G. Trigger. ‘Archaeology and Epistemology: Dialoguing across the Darwinian Chasm’. American Journal of Archaeology 102.1 (1998): 1–34. Print.

---. ‘Marxism in Contemporary Western Archaeology’. Archaeological Method and Theory 5 (1993): 159–200. Print.

Brück, Joanna. ‘Experiencing the Past? The Development of a Phenomenological Archaeology in British Prehistory’. Archaeological Dialogues 12.01 (2005): 45–72. Web.

---. ‘Experiencing the Past? The Development of a Phenomenological Archaeology in British Prehistory’. Archaeological Dialogues 12.1 (2005): 45–72. Web.

---. ‘Monuments, Power and Personhood in the British Neolithic’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7.4 (2001): 649–667. Web.

Brumfiel, E.M. ‘On the Archaeology of Choice: Agency Studies as a Research Strategem’. Agency in Archaeology. London: Routledge, 2000. 249–255. Print.

Buchli, Victor, Lucas, Gavin, and Cox, Margaret. Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past. London: Routledge, 2001. Print.

Butzer, Karl W. Archaeology as Human Ecology: Method and Theory for a Contextual Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982. Print.

Carr, Lydia. Tessa Verney Wheeler: Women and Archaeology before World War Two. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web.

Carrithers, Michael, Steven Collins, and Steven Lukes, eds. The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. Print.

Casella, Eleanor Conlin and Fowler, Chris. The Archaeology of Plural and Changing Identities: Beyond Identification. London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 2005. Print.

Chadwick, A. ‘Post-Processualism, Professionalization and Archaeological Methodologies. Towards Reflexive and Radical Practice’. Archaeological Dialogues 10.1 (2003): 97–117. Web.

Childe, V. Gordon. ‘Preface and Chapter 1’. The Danube in Prehistory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1929. v-xii-1–7. Print.

---. ‘What Happens in Prehistory?’ Piecing Together the Past: The Interpretation of Archaeological Data. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1956. 135–158. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c1eea4f3-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Chilton, Elizabeth S. Material Meanings: Critical Approaches to the Interpretation of Material Culture. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1999. Print.

Chippindale, C. ‘Ambition, Deference, Discrepancy, Comsumption: The Intellectual Background to a Post-Processual Archaeology’. Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda?. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. 27–36. Print.

Chippindale, Christopher. Stonehenge Complete. New and expanded [3rd] ed. [London]: Thames & Hudson, 2004. Print.

---. Who Owns Stonehenge? London: Batsford, 1990. Print.

Chris Gosden. ‘What Do Objects Want?’ Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 12.3 (2005): 193–211. Print.

Clark, Grahame. Archaeology and Society. 3rd ed. London: Methuen, 1960. Print.

Clark, Grahame. ‘Economic Approach to Prehistory’. Economic Prehistory: Papers on Archaeology. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Cambridge University Press, 1989. 149–168. Print.

Clarke, D. L. ‘Archaeology: The Loss of Innocence’. Antiquity 47.185 (1973): 6–18. Print.

---. ‘Archaeology: The Loss of Innocence’. Antiquity 47.185 (1973): 6–18. Print.

Clarke, David L. . ‘Archaeology: The Loss of Innocence’. Antiquity 47.185 (1973): 6–18. Print.

Clarke, David L. and Chapman, Bob. Analytical Archaeology. 2nd ed. London: Methuen, 1978. Print.

Cleal, Rosamund et al. Stonehenge in Its Landscape: Twentieth-Century Excavations. Archaeological report / English Heritage. London: English Heritage, 1995. Print.

Cochrane, E. E. ‘Style, Function and Systematic Empiricism: The Conflation of Process and Pattern’. Style and Function: Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Archaeology. London: Bergin & Garvey, 2001. 183–202. Print.

Cochrane, Ethan E. and Gardner, Andrew. Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast, 2011. Print.

---. Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast, 2011. Print.

Collis, John. Digging up the Past: An Introduction to Archaeological Excavation. Stroud: Sutton, 2001. Print.

Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C. ‘Archaeology and Indigenous Collaboration’. Archaeological Theory Today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2012. 267–291. Print.

Conkey, Margaret W., and Joan M. Gero. ‘Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology’. Annual Review of Anthropology 26.1 (1997): 411–437. Web.

Conkey, Margaret W., and J. D. Spector. ‘Archaeology and the Study of Gender’. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 7 (1984): 1–38. Print.

Conolly, J. ‘Catalhoyuk and the Archaeological Object’. Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Çatalhöyük : By Members of the Çatalhöyük Team. McDonald Institute monographs. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2000. 51–56. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=533279b1-a506-e811-80cd-005056af4099>.

Cooper, Nicholas, Webster, Jane, and University of Leicester. Roman Imperialism: Post-Colonial Perspectives. Leicester archaeology monographs. Leicester: School of Archaeological Studies, University of Leicester, 1996. Print.

Cornell, P., and F. Fahlander. ‘Microarchaeology, Materiality and Social Practice’. Current Swedish Archaeology 10 (2002): 21–38. Print.

Courbin, Paul. What Is Archaeology?: An Essay on the Nature of Archaeological Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988. Print.

Coward, Fiona et al. ‘The Spread of Neolithic Plant Economies from the Near East to Northwest Europe: A Phylogenetic Analysis’. Journal of Archaeological Science 35.1 (2008): 42–56. Web.

Cowgill, G. L. ‘Distinguished Lecture in Archaeology: Beyond Criticizing New Archaeology’. American Anthropologist, New Series 95.3 (1993): 551–573. Print.

Currie, T. E., and R. Mace. ‘Mode and Tempo in the Evolution of Socio-Political Organization: Reconciling “Darwinian” and “Spencerian” Evolutionary Approaches in Anthropology’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366.1567 (2011): 1108–1117. Web.

David, Bruno, and Julian Thomas. ‘Landscape Archaeology: Introduction’. Handbook of Landscape Archaeology. World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, 2008. 27–43. Web. <https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1>.

David J. Meltzer. ‘Paradigms and the Nature of Change in American Archaeology’. American Antiquity 44.4 (1979): 644–657. Print.

Díaz-Andreu García, Margarita. A World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology: Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Web. <https://academic-oup-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/40265>.

---. The Archaeology of Identity: Approaches to Gender, Age, Status, Ethnicity and Religion. London: Routledge, 2005. Print.

Diaz-Andreu, M. ‘Britain and the Other: The Archaeology of Imperialism’. History, Nationhood, and the Question of Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. 227–241. Print.

Dobres, Marcia-Anne. ‘Social Agency and Practice: The Heart and Soul of Technology’. Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2000. 127–163. Print.

Dobres, Marcia-Anne. Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2000. Print.

---. Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2000. Print.

Dobres, Marcia-Anne , and C. R. Hoffman. ‘Social Agency and the Dynamics of Prehistoric Technology’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1.3 (1994): 211–258. Print.

Dobres, Marcia-Anne, and John E. Robb. ‘Agency in Archaeology: Paradigm or Platitude?’ Agency in Archaeology. London: Routledge, 2000. 3–17. Print.

Dornan, J. L. ‘Agency and Archaeology: Past, Present and Future Directions’. Journal of archaeological method and theory 9.4 (2002): 303–329. Web.

Dowson, T.A. ‘Homosexuality, Queer Theory and Archaeology’. Interpretive Archaeology: A Reader. London: Leicester University Press, 2000. 283–289. Print.

Dowson, T.A. . ‘Homosexuality, Queer Theory and Archaeology’. Interpretive Archaeology: A Reader. London: Leicester University Press, 2000. 283–289. Print.

Dunnell, R. C. ‘Five Decades of American Archaeology’. American Archaeology, Past and Future: A Celebration of the Society for American Archaeology, 1935-1985. London: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1986. Print.

---. ‘Style and Function: A Fundamental Dichotomy’. American Antiquity 43.2 (1978): 192–202. Print.

Dyson, Stephen L. In Pursuit of Ancient Pasts: A History of Classical Archaeology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. London: Yale University Press, 2006. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1npzcm>.

Earle et. al., T. K. ‘Processual Archaeology and the Radical Critique’. Current Anthropology 28.4 (1987): 501–538. Print.

Edgeworth, Matt. Acts of Discovery: An Ethnography of Archaeological Practice. BAR international series. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2003. Print.

---. Ethnographies of Archaeological Practice: Cultural Encounters, Material Transformations. Worlds of archaeology series. Lanham: Altamira Press, 2006. Print.

Engelstad, E. . ‘Images of Power and Contradiction: Feminist Theory and Post-Processual Archaeology’. Antiquity 65.248 (1991): 502–514. Print.

Englehardt, Joshua. Agency in Ancient Writing. Boulder: University Press of Colorado, 2013. Print.

Fagan, Brian M. Grahame Clark: An Intellectual Biography of an Archaeologist. Boulder, Colo: Westview, 2001. Print.

Fagan, Garrett G. Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public. London: Routledge, 2006. Print.

Ferguson, L. ‘Struggling with Pots in Colonial South Carolina’. The Archaeology of Inequality. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991. 28–39. Print.

Fewster, Kathryn J. ‘The Role of Agency and Material Culture in Remembering and Forgetting: An Ethnoarchaeological Case Study from Central Spain’. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 20.1 (2006): n. pag. Web.

Fisher, Peter et al. ‘Spatial Analysis of Visible Areas from the Bronze Age Cairns of Mull’. Journal of Archaeological Science 24.7 (1997): 581–592. Web.

Flannery, Kent V. ‘Process and Agency in Early State Formation’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 9.1 (1999): 3–21. Web.

---. ‘Process and Agency in Early State Formation’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 9.1 (1999): 3–21. Web.

---. ‘The Golden Marshalltown: A Parable for the Archeology of the 1980s’. American Anthropologist 84.2 (1982): 265–278. Web. <https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1982.84.2.02a00010>.

Flannery, Kent V. . ‘Archaeological Systems Theory and Early Mesoamerica’. Anthropological Archeology in the Americas. Washington, DC: The Anthropological Society of Washington, 1968. 67–87. Print.

---. ‘Culture History vs. Culture Process: A Debate in American Archaeology’. Scientific American 2.2 (1967): 119–122. Print.

Fleming, A. ‘Post-Processual Landscape Archaeology: A Critique’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 16.3 (2006): 267–280. Web.

Fleming, Andrew. ‘Phenomenology and the Megaliths of Wales: A Dreaming Too Far?’ Oxford Journal of Archaeology 18.2 (1999): 119–125. Web.

Fowler, C. ‘Personhood and Social Relations in the British Neolithic with a Study from the Isle of Man’. Journal of Material Culture 6.2 (2001): 137–163. Web.

Fowler, C. . ‘The Individual, the Subject and Archaeological Interpretation: Reading Luce Irigaray and Judith Butler’. Philosophy and Archaeological Practice: Perspectives for the 21st Century. Göteborg: Bricoleur Press, 2000. 107–122. Print.

Fowler, Chris. The Archaeology of Personhood: An Anthropological Approach. Themes in archaeology. London: Routledge, 2004. Print.

Fowler, D. . ‘Archaeological Ethics in Context and Practice’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2008. 409–422. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1>.

Frere, S. S. ‘Roman Britain since Haverfield and Richmond’. History and Archaeology Review 3 (1988): 31–36. Print.

Funari, Pedro Paulo A., Zarankin, Andrés, and Stovel, Emily. Global Archaeological Theory: Contextual Voices and Contemporary Thoughts. London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2005. Print.

G. N. Bailey. ‘Concepts of Time in Quaternary Prehistory’. Annual Review of Anthropology 12 (1983): 165–192. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155645>.

Gardner, A. ‘Action and Structure in Interpretive Archaeologies’. Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast, 2011. 63–82. Print.

---. ‘Agency’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. Lanham, Md: AltaMira Press, 2008. 95–108. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1>.

---. ‘Seeking a Material Turn: The Artefactuality of the Roman Empire’. TRAC 2002: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference Which Took Place at the University of Kent at Canterbury 5-6 April 2002. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2003. 1–13. Print.

---. ‘Time and Empire in the Roman World’. Journal of Social Archaeology 12.2 (2012): 145–166. Web.

Gardner, Andrew. An Archaeology of Identity: Soldiers and Society in Late Roman Britain. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, 2007. Web. <https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9781315435091/archaeology-identity-andrew-gardner>.

---. An Archaeology of Identity: Soldiers and Society in Late Roman Britain. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, 2007. Web. <https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9781315435091/archaeology-identity-andrew-gardner>.

Gaydarska, B. ‘A Brief History of TAG’. Antiquity 83.322 (2009): 1152–1162. Print.

Gell, Alfred. The Anthropology of Time: Cultural Constructions of Temporal Maps and Images. Explorations in anthropology. Oxford: Berg, 1992. Print.

Geller, Pamela L. ‘Identity and Difference: Complicating Gender in Archaeology’. Annual Review of Anthropology 38.1 (2009): 65–81. Web.

Geoff Emberling. ‘Ethnicity in Complex Societies: Archaeological Perspectives’. Journal of Archaeological Research 5.4 (1997): 295–344. Print.

Gero, Joan M. ‘Archaeological Practice and Gendered Encounters with Field Data’. Gender and Archaeology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996. 251–280. Print.

Gero, Joan M. , and Margaret Wright. ‘Tensions, Pluralities and Engendering Archaeology: An Introduction to Women and Prehistory’. Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991. 3–30. Print.

Gheorghiu, Dragos, and George Nash. Place as Material Culture: Objects, Geographies and the Construction of Time. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Pub, 2013. Print.

Gilchrist, R. ‘Archaeology and the Life Course: A Time and Age for Gender’. A Companion to Social Archaeology. Social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd, 2004. 142–160. Web. <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605>.

Gilchrist, Roberta. ‘Women’s Archaeology? Political Feminism, Gender Theory and Historical Revision’. Antiquity 65.248 (1991): 495–501. Print.

Glenn R. Storey. ‘Archaeology and Roman Society: Integrating Textual and Archaeological Data’. Journal of Archaeological Research 7.3 (1999): 203–248. Print.

Gordon Childe, Vere. ‘Changing Aims and Methods in Prehistory’. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 1 (1935): 1–15. Web. <http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2028_47033.pdf>.

Gosden, C. ‘The Past and Foreign Countries: Colonial and Post-Colonial Archaeology and Anthropology’. A Companion to Social Archaeology. Social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd, 2004. 161–178. Web. <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605>.

Gosden, C., and Y. Marshall. ‘The Cultural Biography of Objects’. World Archaeology 31.2 (1999): 169–178. Print.

Gosden, Chris. ‘Postcolonial Archaeology. Issues of Culture, Identity and Knowledge’. Archaeological Theory Today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2012. 241–261. Print.

Gosden, Chris. Social Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994. Print.

Graves-Brown, P. ‘In Search of the Watchmaker: Attribution of Agency in Natural and Cultural Selection’. Darwinian Archaeologies. Interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology. London: Plenum Press, 1996. 165–181. Print.

Greene, Kevin. ‘Chapter 6: Making Sense of the Past’. Archaeology: An Introduction. 5th ed. London: Routledge, 2010. 249–312. Web. <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203835975>.

Greene, Kevin and Moore, Tom. Archaeology: An Introduction. 5th ed. London: Routledge, 2010. Print.

Greg Woolf. ‘The Present State and Future Scope of Roman Archaeology: A Comment’. American Journal of Archaeology 108.3 (2004): 417–428. Print.

Hales, Shelley and Hodos, Tamar. Material Culture and Social Identities in the Ancient World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Print.

Hamilton et al., Sue . ‘Quarried Away: Thinking about Landscapes of Megalithic Construction on Rapa Nui (Easter Island)’. Handbook of Landscape Archaeology. World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, 2008. 176–186. Web. <https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1>.

Hamilton, S. et al. ‘Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach’. European Journal of Archaeology 9.1 (2006): 31–71. Web.

---. ‘Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach’. European Journal of Archaeology 9.1 (2006): 31–71. Web.

Hamilton, Sue. ‘Lost in Translation? A Comment on the Excavation Report’. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 10 (1999): 1–8. Web.

Hamilton, Sue . ‘The Ambiguity of Landscape: Discussing Points of Relatedness in Concepts and Methods’. Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast, 2011. 263–280. Print.

Hamilton, Sue, Ruth Whitehouse, and Katherine I. Wright. ‘Introduction and Section 1’. Archaeology and Women: Ancient & Modern Issues. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, 2007. 13–40. Print.

Hannah, Robert. Time in Antiquity. Sciences of antiquity. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009. Print.

Harding, Jan. ‘Rethinking the Great Divide: Long‐Term Structural History and the Temporality of Event’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 38.2 (2005): 88–101. Web.

Harris, David R. et al. The Archaeology of V. Gordon Childe: Contemporary Perspectives : Proceedings of the V. Gordon Childe Centennial Conference Held at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 8-9 May 1992 under the Auspices of the Institute of Archaeology and the Prehistoric Society. London: UCL Press, 1994. Print.

Hassan, Fekri. ‘Beyond the Surface: Comments on Hodder’s Reflexive Excavation Methodology’. Antiquity 71.274 (1997): 1020–1025. Print.

Hassan, Fekri A. ‘Beyond the Surface: Comments on Hodder’s “Reflexive Excavation Methodology”’. Antiquity 71.274 (1997): 1020–1025. Print.

Hastorf, C. ‘Gender, Space and Food in Prehistory’. Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991. 132–159. Print.

Hastorf, Christine Ann and Conkey, Margaret Wright. The Uses of Style in Archaeology. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. Print.

Hawkes, Christopher. ‘Wenner-Gren Foundation Supper Conference - Archaeological Theory and Method: Some Suggestiongs from the Old World’. American Anthropologist 56.2 (1954): 155–168. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/664357>.

Hayden, Brian, and Aubrey Cannon. ‘Where the Garbage Goes: Refuse Disposal in the Maya Highlands’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2.2 (1983): 117–163. Web.

Hays-Gilpin, K. ‘Gender’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2008. 335–349. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1>.

Hegmon, M. ‘Archaeological Research on Style’. Annual Review of Anthropology 21 (1992): 517–536. Web.

---. ‘Setting Theoretical Egos aside: Issues and Theory in North American Archaeology’. American Antiquity 68.2 (2003): 213–243. Print.

Henson, Donald. Doing Archaeology: A Subject Guide for Students. London: Routledge, 2012. Web. <https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9780203109878/archaeology-donald-henson>.

Higgs, E. S., and C. Vita-Finzi. ‘Prehistoric Economies: A Territorial Approach’. Papers in Economic Prehistory: Studies by Members and Associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture. London: Cambridge University Press, 1972. 27–36. Print.

Hill, Erica. ‘Gender-Informed Archaeology: The Priority of Definition, the Use of Analogy, and the Multivariate Approach’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 5.1 (1998): 99–128. Web.

Hill, J. N., and R. K. Evans. ‘A Model for Classification and Typology’. Models in Archaeology. London: Methuen, 1972. 231–273. Print.

Hingley, R. ‘Hadrian’s Wall in Theory: Pursuing New Agendas’. Understanding Hadrian’s Wall: Papers from a Conference Held at South Shields, 3rd-5th November 2006, to Mark the Publication of the 14th Edition of the Handbook to the Roman Wall. South Shields: Arbeia Society, 2008. 25–28. Print.

---. ‘“The Most Ancient Boundary between England and Scotland”: Genealogies of the Roman Walls’. Classical Receptions Journal 2.1 (2010): 25–43. Web.

Hingley, Richard. ‘Chapters 9 and 10’. Roman Officers and English Gentlemen: The Imperial Origins of Roman Archaeology. New York: Routledge, 2000. Print.

Hingley, Richard. Roman Officers and English Gentlemen: The Imperial Origins of Roman Archaeology. New York: Routledge, 2000. Print.

Hodder, I. ‘Bridging the Divide: A Commentary on Theoretical Roman Archaeology’. Theoretical Roman Archaeology: First Conference Proceedings. Wordwide archaeology series. Aldershot: Avebury, 1993. xiii–xix. Print.

---. ‘Chapter 1: The Problem’. Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 1–19. Print.

---. ‘Human-Thing Entanglement: Towards an Integrated Archaeological Perspective’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17.1 (2011): 154–177. Web.

---. ‘Material Practice, Symbolism and Ideology’. Theory and Practice in Archaeology. Material cultures. London: Routledge, 1992. 201–212. Print.

---. ‘Material Practice, Symbolism and Ideology’. Theory and Practice in Archaeology. Material cultures. London: Routledge, 1992. 201–212. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6f7f0b8f-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

---. ‘Post-Modernism, Post-Structuralism and Post-Processual Archaeology’. The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression. One world archaeology. London: Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic, 1989. 64–78. Print.

---. ‘Theoretical Archaeology: A Reactionary View’. Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982. 92–121. Print.

Hodder, Ian. ‘Always Momentary, Fluid and Flexible: Towards a Reflexive Excavation Methodology’. Antiquity 71.273 (1997): 691–700. Print.

---. ‘“Always Momentary, Fluid and Flexible”: Towards a Reflexive Excavation Methodology’. Antiquity 71.273 (1997): 691–700. Print.

Hodder, Ian. Archaeological Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity, 2001. Web. <https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451>.

Hodder, Ian. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. Print.

Hodder, Ian. Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past. London: Routledge, 1994. Print.

Hodder, Ian. ‘Interpretive Archaeology and Its Role’. American Antiquity 56.1 (1991): 7–18. Print.

---. ‘Introduction: A Review of Contemporary Theoretical Debate in Archaeology’. Archaeological Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity, 2001. 1–13. Web. <https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451>.

---. ‘Introduction: Contemporary Theoretical Debate in Archaeology’. Archaeological Theory Today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2012. 1–14. Print.

---. ‘Postprocessual Archaeology’. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8 (1985): 1–26. Print.

Hodder, Ian. Symbols in Action: Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982. Print.

---. The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. Print.

Hodder, Ian. ‘Towards a Reflexive Method’. The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. 80–104. Print.

---. ‘Towards a Reflexive Method’. The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. 80–104. Print.

---. ‘Writing Archaeology: Site Reports in Context’. Theory and Practice in Archaeology. Material cultures. London: Routledge, 1992. 263–274. Print.

Hodder, Ian . ‘Whose Rationality? A Response to Fekri Hassan’. Antiquity 72.275 (1998): 213–217. Print.

Hodder, Ian, and Scott Hutson. Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. Third edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814211>.

Hodder, Ian, Håkan Karlsson, and Bjørnar Olsen. ‘40 Years of Theoretical Engagement: A Conversation with Ian Hodder’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 41.1 (2008): 26–42. Web.

Hoffman, Christopher R. and Dobres, Marcia-Anne. The Social Dynamics of Technology: Practice, Politics, and World Views. London: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1999. Print.

Holdaway, Simon and Wandsnider, LuAnn. Time in Archaeology: Time Perspectivism Revisited. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2008. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=3443820>.

Hutson, S. R. ‘Synergy through Disunity, Science as Social Practice: Comments on VanPool and VanPool’. American Antiquity 66.2 (2001): 349–360. Print.

Ian Hodder. ‘Postprocessual Archaeology’. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8 (1985): 1–26. Print.

Ian Hodder and Mark Hassall. ‘The Non-Random Spacing of Romano-British Walled Towns’. Man 6.3 (1971): 391–407. Print.

Ingold, T. ‘Materials against Materiality’. Archaeological Dialogues 14.1 (2007): 1–16. Web.

Ingold, Tim. ‘The Temporality of the Landscape’. World Archaeology 25.2 (1993): 152–174. Print.

James R. Sackett. ‘The Meaning of Style in Archaeology: A General Model’. American Antiquity 42.3 (1977): 369–380. Print.

James, S. ‘Celts, Politics and Motivation in Archaeology’. Antiquity 72.275 (1998): 200–209. Print.

---. ‘Roman Archaeology: Crisis and Revolution’. Antiquity 77.295 (2003): 178–184. Web. <http://search.proquest.com/docview/217561304?accountid=14511>.

James, Simon et al. Britons and Romans: Advancing an Archaeological Agenda. CBA research report. York: Council for British Archaeology, 2001. Print.

---. The Atlantic Celts: Ancient People or Modern Invention? London: British Museum Press, 1999. Print.

James, Simon. ‘Writing the Legions: The Development and Future of Roman Military Studies in Britain’. Archaeological Journal 159.1 (2002): 1–58. Web.

Johnson, M. ‘On the Nature of Theoretical Archaeology and Archaeological Theory’. Archaeological Dialogues 13.2 (2006): 117–132. Web.

Johnson, M. H. ‘Rethinking Historical Archaeology’. Historical Archaeology: Back from the Edge. One world archaeology. New York: Routledge, 1999. 23–36. Print.

Johnson, Matthew. Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. Print.

Johnson, Matthew. ‘Chapters 6 and 7’. Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. Print.

---. ‘Common Sense Is Not Enough’. Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. 1–11. Print.

Johnson, Matthew H. ‘Conceptions of Agency in Archaeological Interpretation’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8.2 (1989): 189–211. Web.

Jones, Andrew. Archaeological Theory and Scientific Practice. Topics in contemporary archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Print.

Jones, S. ‘Discourses of Identity in the Interpretation of the Past’. Interpretive Archaeology: A Reader. London: Leicester University Press, 2000. 445–457. Print.

---. ‘Ethnicity: Theoretical Approaches, Methodological Implications’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2008. 321–333. Print.

Jones, S. The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. London: Routledge, 1997. Print.

Jones, S. . ‘Chapter 2’. The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. London: Routledge, 1997. Print.

Joyce, R. ‘Embodied Subjectivity: Gender, Feminity, Masculinity, Sexuality’. A Companion to Social Archaeology. Social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd, 2004. 82–95. Web. <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605>.

Joyce, R. A. ‘Unintended Consequences? Monumentality as a Novel Experience in Formative Mesoamerica’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 11.1 (2004): 5–29. Print.

Joyce, Rosemary A. ‘Archaeology of the Body’. Annual Review of Anthropology 34.1 (2005): 139–158. Web.

Karlin, C., and M. Julien. ‘Prehistoric Technology: A Cognitive Science?’ The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 152–163. Print.

Karlsson, Håkan. It’s about Time: The Concept of Time in Archaeology. Göteborg: Bricoleur, 2001. Print.

Kent G. Lightfoot, Antoinette Martinez and Ann M. Schiff. ‘Daily Practice and Material Culture in Pluralistic Social Settings: An Archaeological Study of Culture Change and Persistence from Fort Ross, California’. American Antiquity 63.2 (1998): 199–222. Print.

Knapp, A. Bernard, and Lynn Meskell. ‘Bodies of Evidence on Prehistoric Cyprus’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 7.02 (1997): 183–204. Web.

Knapp, A. Bernard, and Peter van Dommelen. ‘Past Practices: Rethinking Individuals and Agents in Archaeology’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18.01 (2008): 15–34. Web.

Knappet, C. ‘Materiality’. Archaeological Theory Today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2012. 188–207. Print.

Knappett, C. ‘Photographs, Skeuomorphs and Marionettes: Some Thoughts on Mind, Agency and Object’. Journal of Material Culture 7.1 (2002): 97–117. Web.

Knappett, Carl. An Archaeology of Interaction: Network Perspectives on Material Culture and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Web. <https://academic.oup.com/book/1407>.

---. Thinking through Material Culture: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Archaeology, culture, and society. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005. Print.

Knappett, Carl and Malafouris, Lambros. Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer, 2008. Print.

Kohl, Philip L. ‘Nationalism and Archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past’. Annual Review of Anthropology 27.1 (1998): 223–246. Web.

---. ‘Nationalism and Archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past’. Annual Review of Anthropology 27.1 (1998): 223–246. Web.

Kohl, Philip L., and Clare Fawcett. ‘Archaeology in the Service of the State: Theoretical Considerations’. Nationalism, Politics, and the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. 3–18. Print.

Kristiansen, K. ‘Genes versus Agents: A Discussion of the Widening Theoretical Gap in Archaeology’. Archaeological Dialogues 11.2 (2004): 77–99. Web.

Kristiansen, Kristian. ‘Genes versus Agents. A Discussion of the Widening Theoretical Gap in Archaeology’. Archaeological Dialogues 11.2 (2004): 77–99. Web.

Lake, Mark. ‘Viewing Space’. World Archaeology 39.1 (2007): 1–3. Print.

LaMotta, V., and M. Schiffer. ‘Behavioral Archaeology. Towards a New Synthesis’. Archaeological Theory Today. Rev. and updated ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2012. 14–64. Print.

LaMotta, V., and M. Schiffer. ‘Behavioral Archaeology. Towards a New Synthesis’. Archaeological Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity, 2001. Web. <https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451>.

Layton, R. . ‘Structuralism and Semiotics’. Handbook of Material Culture. London: SAGE, 2006. 29–42. Web. <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781446206430>.

Layton, Robert. Who Needs the Past?: Indigenous Values and Archaeology. One world archaeology. London: Routledge, 1994. Print.

Lemonnier, Pierre. ‘The Study of Material Culture Today: Toward an Anthropology of Technical Systems’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5.2 (1986): 147–186. Web.

Leone et al., M. ‘Can an African-American Historical Archaeology Be an Alternative Voice?’ Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past. London: Routledge, 1994. 110–124. Print.

Leone, M. ‘Symbolic, Structural and Critical Archaeology’. American Archaeology, Past and Future: A Celebration of the Society for American Archaeology, 1935-1985. London: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1986. 415–438. Print.

Leone, M. . ‘Towards a Critical Archaeology’. Current Anthropology 28.3 (1987): 283–302. Print.

Leone, M., and R. Preucel. ‘Archaeology in a Democratic Society: A Critical Perspective’. Quandaries and Quests: Visions of Archaeology’s Future. Occasional paper / Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale. [Carbondale, Ill.]: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 1992. 115–135. Print.

Leone, Mark P. Contemporary Archaeology: A Guide to Theory and Contributions. Carbondale, Ill: Feffer & Simons, 1972. Print.

---. The Archaeology of Liberty in an American Capital: Excavations in Annapolis. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1ppc5g>.

Lipo, Carl P. and Society for American Archaeology. Mapping Our Ancestors: Phylogenetic Approaches in Anthropology and Prehistory. New Brunswick, N.J.: Aldine Transaction, 2006. Print.

Llobera, M. ‘Exploring the Topography of Mind: GIS, Social Space and Archaeology’. Antiquity 70.269 (1996): 612–622. Print.

Lucas, Gavin. ‘Introduction: Archaeology and the Field’. Critical Approaches to Fieldwork: Contemporary and Historical Archaeological Practice. London: Routledge, 2001. 1–17. Print.

Lucas, Gavin. The Archaeology of Time. Themes in archaeology. London: Routledge, 2005. Print.

Lucas, Gavin. ‘Time and Archaeological Event’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18.01 (2008): 59–65. Web.

---. Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Web. <https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511845772>.

Lydon, Jane and Rizvi, Uzma Z. Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology. World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, 2010. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=911816>.

Lyman, R. L. ‘What Is the `process’ in Cultural Process and in Processual Archaeology?’ Anthropological Theory 7.2 (2007): 217–250. Web.

Lyman, R. L., and M. J. O’Brien. ‘A History of Normative Theory in Americanist Archaeology’. Journal of archaeological method and theory 11.4 (2004): 369–396. Print.

Lyman, R. Lee, O’Brien, Michael J., and Dunnell, Robert C. The Rise and Fall of Culture History. London: Plenum Press, 1997. Print.

Lyman, R.Lee, and Michael J. O’Brien. ‘Measuring and Explaining Change in Artifact Variation with Clade-Diversity Diagrams’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 19.1 (2000): 39–74. Web.

Mace, Ruth, Holden, Clare Janaki, and Shennan, Stephen. The Evolution of Cultural Diversity: A Phylogenetic Approach. London: UCL Press, 2005. Print.

MacGregor, G. ‘Post-Processual Archaeology: The Hidden Agenda of the Secret Agent’. Archaeological Theory: Progress or Posture?. Worldwide archaeology series. Aldershot: Avebury, 1994. 79–91. Print.

Mackenzie, Iain M. Archaeological Theory: Progress or Posture? Worldwide archaeology series. Aldershot: Avebury, 1994. Print.

---. Archaeological Theory: Progress or Posture? Worldwide archaeology series. Aldershot: Avebury, 1994. Print.

Madonna L. Moss. ‘Rifts in the Theoretical Landscape of Archaeology in the United States: A Comment on Hegmon and Watkins’. American Antiquity 70.3 (2005): 581–587. Print.

Margaret W. Conkey. ‘Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology?’ Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 14.3 (2007): 285–310. Print.

---. ‘Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology?’ Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 14.3 (2007): 285–310. Print.

Martinón-Torres, Marcos. ‘Chaîne Opératoire: The Concept and Its Aplications within the Study of Technology’. Gallaecia 21 (2002): 29–43. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=fb4bab91-db3d-ee11-8457-0050f2f06092>.

Maschner, Herbert D. G., Chippindale, Christopher, and Bentley, R. Alexander. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2008. Print.

Mason, David J. P. and Symonds, Matthew F. A. Frontiers of Knowledge: A Research Framework for Hadrian’s Wall, Part of the Frontiers of the Roman Empire World Heritage Site. Durham: Durham County Council and Durham University, 2009. Print.

McGlade, James. ‘Archaeology and the Evolution of Cultural Landscapes: Towards an Interdisciplinary Agenda’. The Archaeology and Anthropology of Landscape: Shaping Your Landscape. One world archaeology. London: Routledge, 1999. 458–482. Print.

McGuire, R. ‘Contested Pasts: Archaeology and Native Americans’. A Companion to Social Archaeology. Social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd, 2004. 374–395. Print.

McGuire, Randall H. Archaeology as Political Action. California series in public anthropology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008. Print.

Megaw, J. V. S., and M. R. Megaw. ‘Ancient Celts and Modern Ethnicity’. Antiquity 70.267 (1996): 175–181. Print.

Meskell, Lynn. ‘Archaeologies of Identity’. Archaeological Theory Today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2012. 187–213. Print.

Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of Materiality. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2006. Print.

---. Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class et Cetera in Ancient Egypt. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. Print.

---. Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class et Cetera in Ancient Egypt. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. Print.

---. Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class et Cetera in Ancient Egypt. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. Print.

---. Archaeology under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. London: Routledge, 1998. Print.

---. Object Worlds in Ancient Egypt: Material Biographies Past and Present. Materializing culture. Oxford: Berg, 2004. Print.

Meskell, Lynn. ‘The Intersections of Identity and Politics in Archaeology’. Annual Review of Anthropology 31.1 (2002): 279–301. Web.

Meskell, Lynn and Joyce, Rosemary A. Embodied Lives: Figuring Ancient Maya and Egyptian Experience. London: Routledge, 2003. Print.

---. Embodied Lives: Figuring Ancient Maya and Egyptian Experience. London: Routledge, 2003. Print.

Meskell, Lynn and Preucel, Robert W. A Companion to Social Archaeology. Social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd, 2004. Web. <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605>.

Michael Shanks. ‘Symmetrical Archaeology’. World Archaeology 39.4 (2007): 589–596. Print.

Michelle Hegmon. ‘No More Theory Wars: A Response to Moss’. American Antiquity 70.3 (2005): 588–590. Print.

---. ‘Setting Theoretical Egos Aside: Issues and Theory in North American Archaeology’. American Antiquity 68.2 (2003): 213–243. Print.

Miller, D. ‘Artefacts and the Meaning of Things’. Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology. [New ed.]. Routledge world reference. London: Routledge, 2002. 396–419. Web. <https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490>.

Miller, Daniel. Materiality. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2005. Print.

Miller, Daniel, and Christopher Y. Tilley. ‘Ideology, Power and Prehistory: An Introduction’. Ideology, Power and Prehistory. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 1–15. Print.

Mithen, Steven J. The Prehistory of the Mind: A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion and Science. London: Thames & Hudson, 1996. Print.

---. Thoughtful Foragers: A Study of Prehistoric Decision Making. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Print.

Mizoguchi, Kōji. Archaeology, Society and Identity in Modern Japan. Cambridge studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Print.

Moore, Henrietta L. ‘Bodies on the Move: Gender, Power and Material Culture’. A Passion for Difference: Essays in Anthropology and Gender. Cambridge: Polity, 1994. 71–85. Print.

Moore, T. ‘Detribalizing the Later Prehistoric Past: Concepts of Tribes in Iron Age and Roman Studies’. Journal of Social Archaeology 11.3 (2011): 334–360. Web.

Moshenska, Gabriel and Dhanjal, Sarah. Community Archaeology: Themes, Methods and Practices. Oxford: Oxbow, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1154191>.

Murray, T. ‘Communication and the Importance of Disciplinary Communities: Who Owns the Past?’ Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda?. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. 105–116. Print.

Murray, Tim and World Archaeological Congress. Time and Archaeology. One world archaeology. London: Routledge, 1999. Print.

Mytum, Harold. ‘Materiality and Memory: An Archaeological Perspective on the Popular Adoption of Linear Time in Britain’. Antiquity 81.312 (2007): 381–396. Web. <http://search.proquest.com/docview/217581355?accountid=14511>.

Nancy D. Munn. ‘The Cultural Anthropology of Time: A Critical Essay’. Annual Review of Anthropology 21 (1992): 93–123. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155982>.

Nanni, G. ‘Time, Empire and Resistance in Settler-Colonial Victoria’. Time & Society 20.1 (2011): 5–33. Web.

Nelson, M. C. . ‘The Study of Technological Organization’. Archaeological Method and Theory 3 (1991): 57–100. Print.

Nelson, Sarah M. Handbook of Gender in Archaeology. Gender and archaeology series. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2006. Print.

Nesbitt, C., and D. Tolia-Kelly. ‘Hadrian’s Wall: Embodied Archaeologies of the Linear Monument’. Journal of Social Archaeology 9.3 (2009): 368–390. Web.

O’Brien, Michael J. ‘Style, Function, Transmission: An Introduction’. Style, Function, Transmission: Evolutionary Archaeological Perspectives. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2003. 1–32. Print.

O’Brien, Michael J., R. Lee Lyman, and Robert D. Leonard. ‘What Is Evolution? A Response to Bamforth’. American Antiquity 68.3 (2003): 573–580. Print.

O’Brien, Michael J., Lyman, R. Lee, and Schiffer, Michael B. Archaeology as a Process: Processualism and Its Progeny. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2005. Print.

---. Archaeology as a Process: Processualism and Its Progeny. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2005. Print.

Olsen, B. ‘Symmetical Archaeology’. Archaeological Theory Today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2012. 208–228. Print.

Olsen, Bjørnar. Archaeology: The Discipline of Things. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2012. Print.

Olsen, BjØrnar. ‘Material Culture after Text: Re‐membering Things’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36.2 (2003): 87–104. Web.

Papaconstantinou, Demetra. Deconstructing Context: A Critical Approach to Archaeological Practice. Oxford: Oxbow, 2006. Print.

Parker Pearson et. al., M. . ‘Stonehenge, Its River and Its Landscape: Unravelling the Mysteries of a Prehistoric Sacred Place’. Archäologischer Anzeiger: Beiblatt zum Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 1 (2006): 237–258. Print.

---. ‘The Age of Stonehenge’. Antiquity 81.313 (2007): 617–639. Print.

---. ‘Who Was Buried at Stonehenge?’ Antiquity 83.319 (2009): 23–39. Print.

Parker Pearson, M. and Ramilisonina. ‘Stonehenge for the Ancestors: The Stones Pass on the Message’. Antiquity 72.276 (1998): 308–326. Print.

---. ‘Stonehenge for the Ancestors: The Stones Pass on the Message’. Antiquity 72.276 (1998): 308–326. Print.

Patrik, L. E. ‘Is There an Archaeological Record?’ Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8 (1985): 27–62. Print.

Patterson, T. ‘Social Archaeology and Marxist Social Thought’. A Companion to Social Archaeology. Social archaeology. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd, 2004. 66–81. Web. <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605>.

Patterson, Thomas Carl. Marx’s Ghost: Conversations with Archaeologists. Oxford: Berg, 2003. Print.

Pauketat, T. R. ‘Practice and History in Archaeology: An Emerging Paradigm’. Anthropological Theory 1.1 (2001): 73–98. Web.

---. ‘Practice and History in Archaeology: An Emerging Paradigm’. Anthropological Theory 1.1 (2001): 73–98. Web.

Pearson, M. P. ‘Materializing Stonehenge: The Stonehenge Riverside Project and New Discoveries’. Journal of Material Culture 11.1–2 (2006): 227–261. Web.

Pearson, Mike Parker, Tim Schadla-Hall, and Gabe Moshenska. ‘Resolving the Human Remains Crisis in British Archaeology’. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 21 (2011): 5–9. Web.

Pfaffenberger, Bryan. ‘Social Anthropology of Technology’. Annual Review of Anthropology 21.1 (1992): 491–516. Web.

Plog, F. . ‘Laws, Systems of Laws and the Explanation of Observed Variation’. The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory. London: Duckworth, 1973. 649–661. Print.

Pluciennik, Mark, Tarlow, Sarah, and Hamilakis, Yannis. Thinking through the Body: Archaeologies of Corporeality. London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2002. Print.

Pope, Rachel. ‘Processual Archaeology and Gender Politics. The Loss of Innocence’. Archaeological Dialogues 18.1 (2011): 59–86. Web.

---. ‘Processual Archaeology and Gender Politics. The Loss of Innocence’. Archaeological Dialogues 18.01 (2011): 59–86. Web.

Powell, A., S. Shennan, and M. G. Thomas. ‘Late Pleistocene Demography and the Appearance of Modern Human Behavior’. Science 324.5932 (2009): 1298–1301. Web.

Praetzellis, Adrian. Death by Theory: A Tale of Mystery and Archaeological Theory. Oxford: AltaMira Press, 2000. Print.

Preucel, R. W. ‘The Postprocessual Condition’. Journal of Archaeological Research 3.2 (1995): 147–175. Print.

Preucel, R. W., and S. A. Mrozowski. ‘The New Pragmatism’. Contemporary Archaeology in Theory: The New Pragmatism. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. 3–49. Print.

Preucel, Robert, and Alexander Bauer. ‘Archaeological Pragmatics’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 34.2 (2001): 85–96. Web.

Preucel, Robert W. Archaeological Semiotics. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006. Print.

Price, Barbara J. ‘Cultural Materialism: A Theoretical Review’. American Antiquity 47.4 (1982): 709–741. Print.

Quirke, Stephen. Hidden Hands: Egyptian Workforces in Petrie Excavation Archives, 1880-1924. Duckworth egyptology. London: Gerald Duckworth, 2010. Print.

R. Alexander Bentley, Matthew W. Hahn and Stephen J. Shennan. ‘Random Drift and Culture Change’. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 271.1547 (2004): 1443–1450. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/4142981>.

Ratnagar, Shereen. ‘Archaeology at the Heart of a Political Confrontation: The Case of Ayodhya’. Current Anthropology 45.2 (2004): 239–259. Web.

Rautman, Alison E. and Gender and Archaeology Conference. Reading the Body: Representations and Remains in the Archaeological Record. Regendering the past. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000. Print.

Redman, C. ‘The Development of Archaeological Theory’. Companion Encyclopedia of Archaeology. London: Routledge, 1999. 48–80. Print.

Redman, C. L. ‘Distinguished Lecture in Archaeology: In Defence of the Seventies - The Adolescence of New Archaeology’. American Anthropologist 93.2 (1991): 295–307. Print.

Redman, Charles L. Social Archeology: Beyond Subsistence and Dating. Studies in archeology. New York: Academic Press, 1978. Print.

Rega, E. ‘Age, Gender and Biological Reality in the Early Bronze Age Cemetery at Mokrin’. Invisible People and Processes: Writing Gender and Childhood into European Archaeology. London: Leicester University Press, 1996. 229–247. Print.

Reid, Donald M. Whose Pharaohs?: Archaeology, Museums, and Egyptian National Identity from Napoleon to World War I. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2002. Print.

Reinhard Bernbeck and Susan Pollock. ‘Ayodhya, Archaeology, and Identity’. Current Anthropology 37.1 (1996): S138–S142. Print.

Renfrew, C. ‘Towards a Cognitive Archaeology’. The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 3–12. Print.

Renfrew, Colin. ‘Beyond Diffusion’. Before Civilization: The Radiocarbon Revolution and Prehistoric Europe. London: Pimlico, 1999. 109–119. Print.

Renfrew, Colin . ‘Culture Systems and the Multiplier Effect’. The Emergence of Civilisation: The Cyclades and the Aegean in the Third Millennium B.C. Studies in prehistory. London: Methuen, 1972. 19–44. Print.

---. ‘Monuments, Mobilization and Social Organisation in Neolithic Wessex’. The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory. London: Duckworth, 1973. 539–558. Print.

---. ‘Monuments, Mobilization and Social Organization in Neolithic Wessex’. The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory. London: Duckworth, 1973. 539–558. Print.

Renfrew, Colin, Cunliffe, Barry W., and British Academy. Science and Stonehenge. Proceedings of the British Academy. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 1997. Print.

Renfrew, Colin, DeMarrais, Elizabeth, and Gosden, Chris. Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World. McDonald Institute monographs. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2004. Print.

Renfrew, Colin and Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects. The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory. London: Duckworth, 1973. Print.

Review by: Lewis R. Binford. ‘American Antiquity’. Vol. 53.No. 4 875–876. Print.

Richards, Julian C., Allen, Mike, and English Heritage. The Stonehenge Environs Project. Archaeological report. London: Historical Buildings & Monuments Commission for England, 1990. Print.

Richards, Julian C. and English Heritage. English Heritage Book of Stonehenge. London: B. T. Batsford Ltd./ English Heritage, 1991. Print.

Richerson, Peter J. and Boyd, Robert. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. Print.

Richerson, Peter J., and Robert Boyd. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. Print.

Robb, J. E. ‘The Archaeology of Symbols’. Annual Review of Anthropology 27 (1998): 329–346. Web.

Robb, John E., and Marcia-Anne Dobres. ‘Agency in Archaeology: Paradigm or Platitude?’ Agency in Archaeology. London: Routledge, 2000. 3–17. Print.

Robb, John, and Timothy R. Pauketat. Big Histories, Human Lives: Tackling Problems of Scale in Archaeology. School for Advanced Research advanced seminar series. Santa Fe, N.M.: School for Advanced Research Press, 2013. Print.

Robert C. Dunnell. ‘The Harvey Lecture Series. Science, Social Science, and Common Sense: The Agonizing Dilemma of Modern Archaeology’. Journal of Anthropological Research 38.1 (1982): 1–25. Print.

Rosen, Ralph Mark and University of Pennsylvania. Time and Temporality in the Ancient World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, 2004. Print.

Roskams, Steve. ‘Future Prospects’. Excavation. Cambridge manuals in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 267–290. Print.

Ross, Jennifer C. and Steadman, Sharon R. Agency and Identity in the Ancient Near East: New Paths Forward. Approaches to anthropological archaeology. London: Equinox, 2010. Print.

Rowley-Conwy, P., Robert Layton, and Catherine Panter-Brick. Hunter-Gatherers: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. The Biosocial Society symposium series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Print.

Saitta, Dean J. The Archaeology of Collective Action. The American experience in archaeological perspective. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2007. Print.

Scarre, Geoffrey, and Robin Coningham. Appropriating the Past: Philosophical Perspectives on the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Web. <https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781139026932>.

Schiffer, M. B., and J. M. Skibo. ‘The Explanation of Artifact Variability’. American Antiquity 62.1 (1997): 27–50. Print.

Schiffer, Michael B. ‘Archaeological Context and Systemic Context’. American Antiquity 37.2 (1972): 156–165. Print.

Schiffer, Michael B. Behavioral Archaeology. Studies in archaeology. London: Academic Press, 1976. Print.

---. Behavioral Archaeology: First Principles. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1995. Print.

---. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. Albuquerque, N.M.: University of New Mexico Press, 1987. Print.

Schiffer, Michael B. ‘Is There a “Pompeii Premise” in Archaeology?’ Journal of Anthropological Research 41.1 (1985): 18–41. Print.

Schlanger , N. ‘Mindful Technology: Unleashing the Chaine Operatoire for an Archaeology of Mind’. The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 143–151. Print.

Schnapp, A. ‘Between Antiquarians and Archaeologists - Continuities and Ruptures’. Antiquity 76.291 (2002): 134–140. Print.

Shanks, Michael . ‘Post-Processual Archaeology and After’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2008. 133–144. Print.

---. ‘Post-Processual Archaeology and After’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2008. 133–144. Web. <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780759113602>.

Shanks, Michael, and Ian Hodder. ‘Processual, Postprocessual and Interpretive Archaeologies’. Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past. London: Routledge, 1994. 3–29. Print.

Shanks, Michael, and R. H. McGuire. ‘The Craft of Archaeology’. American Antiquity 61.1 (1996): 75–88. Print.

Shanks, Michael, and Christopher Tilley. ‘Abstract and Substantial Time’. Archaeological Review From Cambridge 6.1 (1987): 32–41. Print.

---. ‘Comments on Archaeology into the 1990s’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 22.1 (1989): 12–54. Web. <https://www-tandfonline-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/toc/sarc20/22/1?nav=tocList>.

Shanks, Michael, and Christopher Y Tilley. ‘Archaeology and the Politics of Theory’. Social Theory and Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell, 1987. 186–208. Print.

Shanks, Michael, and Christopher Y. Tilley. ‘Chapter 3: Facts and Values in Archaeology’. Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 1992. 46–67. Print.

Shanks, Michael and Tilley, Christopher Y. Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 1992. Print.

Shanks, Michael, and Christopher Y. Tilley. ‘The Individual and the Social’. Social Theory and Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell, 1987. 61–78. Print.

Shennan, S. ‘Descent with Modification and the Archaeological Record’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366.1567 (2011): 1070–1079. Web.

Shennan, S. J. ‘Introduction: Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity’. Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity. One world archaeology. London: Routledge, 1994. 1–32. Print.

Shennan, S. J. . ‘An Evolutionary Perspective on the Goals of Archaeology’. Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast, 2011. 325–344. Print.

Shennan, Stephen. ‘Evolution in Archaeology’. Annual Review of Anthropology 37.1 (2008): 75–91. Web.

Shennan, Stephen. Genes, Memes and Human History: Darwinian Archaeology and Cultural Evolution. London: Thames & Hudson, 2002. Print.

---. Genes, Memes and Human History: Darwinian Archaeology and Cultural Evolution. London: Thames & Hudson, 2002. Print.

---. Pattern and Process in Cultural Evolution. Origins of human behavior and culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009. Print.

Shott, Michael J. ‘Status and Role of Formation Theory in Contemporary Archaeological Practice’. Journal of archaeological research 6.4 (1998): 299–329. Print.

Sigault, F. ‘Technology’. Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology. [New ed.]. Routledge world reference. London: Routledge, 2002. 420–459. Web. <https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490>.

SILLAR, B., and M. S. TITE. ‘THE CHALLENGE OF ‘TECHNOLOGICAL CHOICES’FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE APPROACHES IN ARCHAEOLOGY’. Archaeometry 42.1 (2000): 2–20. Web.

Sillar, Bill. ‘The Social Agency of Things? Animism and Materiality in the Andes’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19.03 (2009): 367–377. Web.

Sinclair, A. ‘Constellations of Knowledge: Human Agency and Material Affordance in Lithic Technology’. Agency in Archaeology. London: Routledge, 2000. 196–212. Print.

Smith, Laurajane. Archaeological Theory and the Politics of Cultural Heritage. London: Routledge, 2004. Print.

---. Archaeological Theory and the Politics of Cultural Heritage. London: Routledge, 2004. Print.

Smith, Stuart Tyson. Wretched Kush: Ethnic Identities and Boudaries in Egypt’s Nubian Empire. London: Routledge, 2003. Print.

Sofaer, Joanna R. The Body as Material Culture: A Theoretical Osteoarchaeology. Topics in contemporary archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Web. <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816666>.

Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig. Gender Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000. Print.

Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig. ‘Reading Dress: The Construction of Social Categories and Identities in Bronze Age Europe’. Journal of European Archaeology 5.1 (1997): 93–114. Web.

Spaulding, A. C. ‘Statistical Techniques for the Discovery of Artifact Types’. American Antiquity 18.4 (1953): 305–313. Print.

Spector, J. ‘What This Awl Means: Towards a Feminist Archaeology’. Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991. 388–406. Print.

Spriggs, M. ‘Ethnographic Parallels and the Denial of History’. World Archaeology 40.4 (2008): 538–552. Web.

Stark, Miriam T. The Archaeology of Social Boundaries. Smithsonian series in archaeological inquiry. London: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1998. Print.

Steven Mithen. ‘Understanding Mind and Culture: Evolutionary Psychology or Social Anthropology?’ Anthropology Today 11.6 (1995): 3–7. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2783517?origin=crossref>.

Stottman, M. Jay. Archaeologists as Activists: Can Archaeologists Change the World? Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2010. Print.

Strauss, Claudia. ‘Blaming for Columbine’. Current Anthropology 48.6 (2007): 807–832. Web.

Tarlow, Sarah, and Liv Nilsson Stutz. ‘Can an Archaeologist Be a Public Intellectual?’ Archaeological Dialogues 20.01 (2013): 1–5. Web.

Tarlow, Sarah and West, Susie. The Familiar Past?: Archaeologies of Later Historical Britain. London: Routledge, 1999. Print.

Taylor, T. ‘Materiality’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2008. 297–320. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1>.

Taylor, Walter W. . ‘Chapter 6’. A Study of Archaeology. Memoir series of the American Anthropological Association. [S.l.]: American Anthropological Association, 1948. Print.

---. ‘Chapter 6’. A Study of Archaeology. Memoir series of the American Anthropological Association. [S.l.]: American Anthropological Association, 1948. Print.

---. ‘Old Wine and New Skins: A Contemporary Parable’. Contemporary Archaeology: A Guide to Theory and Contributions. Carbondale, Ill: Feffer & Simons, 1972. 28–33. Print.

Thomas, David Hurst. Skull Wars: Kennewick Man, Archaeology, and the Battle for Native American Identity. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books, 2000. Print.

Thomas, J. ‘Archaeologies of Place and Landscape’. Archaeological Theory Today. Rev. and updated ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2012. 165–186. Print.

---. ‘Culture and Identity’. Companion Encyclopedia of Archaeology. London: Routledge, 1999. 431–469. Print.

---. ‘Culture and Identity’. Companion Encyclopedia of Archaeology. London: Routledge, 1999. 431–469. Print.

---. ‘Where Are We Now? Archaeological Theory in the 1990s’. Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. London: Routledge, 1994. 343–362. Print.

---. ‘Where Are We Now? Archaeological Theory in the 1990s’. Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. London: Routledge, 1994. 343–362. Print.

Thomas, J. S. ‘The Politics of Vision and the Archaeologies of Landscape’. Landscape: Politics and Perspectives. Explorations in anthropology. New York: Berg, 1993. 19–48. Print.

Thomas, Julian. Archaeology and Modernity. London: Routledge, 2004. Print.

Thomas, Julian. ‘Chapter 6’. Archaeology and Modernity. London: Routledge, 2004. Print.

---. ‘Humanism and the Individual: Chapter 6’. Archaeology and Modernity. London: Routledge, 2004. 119–148. Print.

Thomas, Julian. Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretative Archaeology. London: Routledge, 1996. Print.

---. Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretative Archaeology. New York: Routledge, 1996. Print.

Thomas, Julian and David, Bruno. Handbook of Landscape Archaeology. World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, 2008. Web. <https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1>.

Thomas, Julian, Jorge, Vítor Oliveira, and Theoretical Archaeology Group (England). Overcoming the Modern Invention of Material Culture: Proceedings of the TAG Session, Exeter 2006. Journal of Iberian archaeology. Porto: ADECAP, 2007. Print.

Tilley, C. ‘Interpreting Material Culture’. The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression. One world archaeology. London: Routledge, 1989. 185–194. Print.

Tilley, Christopher. ‘Excavation as Theatre’. Antiquity 63.239 (1989): 275–280. Print.

---. ‘Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 14.2 (2004): 185–203. Web.

---. ‘Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 14.2 (2004): 185–203. Web.

Tilley, Christopher, and Wayne Bennett. ‘An Archaeology of Super-Natural Places: The Case of West Penwith’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7.2 (2001): 335–362. Print.

Tilley, Christopher Y. ‘Ideology and the Legitimation of Power in the Middle Neolithic of Southern Sweden’. Ideology, Power and Prehistory. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 111–145. Web.

Tilley, Christopher Y. Interpretative Archaeology. Explorations in anthropology. New York: Berg, 1992. Print.

---. Metaphor and Material Culture. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1999. Print.

Tilley, Christopher Y. ‘The Powers of Rocks: Topography and Monument Construction on Bodmin Moor’. World Archaeology 28.2 (1996): 161–176. Print.

Tilley, Christopher Y. . ‘Archaeology as Socio-Political Action in the Present’. Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology: Essays in the Philosophy, History and Socio-Politics of Archaeology. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. 104–116. Print.

Tilley, Christopher Y . ‘Phenomenological Approaches to Landscape Archaeology’. Handbook of Landscape Archaeology. World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, 2008. 271–276. Web. <https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1>.

Tilley, Christopher Y. . ‘Space, Place, Landscape and Perception: Phenomenological Perspectives’. A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths, and Monuments. Explorations in anthropology. Oxford: Berg, 1994. 7–34. Print.

Tim Ingold. ‘The Temporality of the Landscape’. World Archaeology 25.2 (1993): 152–174. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/124811>.

Treherne, P. ‘The Warrior’s Beauty: The Masculine Body and Self-Identity in Bronze Age Europe’. Journal of European archaeology: journal of the European Association of Archaeologists 3.1 (1995): 105–144. Print.

Trigger, B G. ‘Archaeology at the Crossroads: What’s New?’ Annual Review of Anthropology 13.1 (1984): 275–300. Web.

Trigger, Bruce G. A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Web. <https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511813016>.

---. A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Web. <https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511813016>.

Trigger, Bruce G. ‘Archaeology and the Image of the American Indian’. American Antiquity 45.4 (1980): 662–676. Print.

---. ‘Hyper-Relativism, Responsibility and the Social Sciences’. Artifacts & Ideas: Essays in Archaeology. London: Transaction, 2003. 113–131. Print.

---. ‘Post‐processual Developments in Anglo‐American Archaeology’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 24.2 (1991): 65–76. Print.

Trigger, Bruce G. . ‘Aims in Prehistoric Archaeology’. Antiquity 44.173 (1970): 26–37. Print.

---. ‘Alternative Archaeologies: Nationalist, Colonialist, Imperialist’. Man 19.3 (1984): 355–370. Print.

---. ‘Chapter 7’. A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Web. <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016>.

---. ‘Chapter 8: Processualism and Post-Processualism’. A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Web. <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016>.

---. ‘Chapter 9 and 10’. A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Web. <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016>.

---. ‘Culture-Historical Archaeology’. A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 211–313. Print.

---. ‘Current Trends in American Archaeology’. Time and Traditions: Essays in Archaeological Interpretation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1978. 2–18. Print.

---. ‘Distinguished Lecture in Archaeology: Constraint and Freedom - A New Synthesis for Archaeological Explanation’. American Anthropologist 93.3 (1991): 551–569. Print.

---. ‘Expanding Middle-Range Theory’. Antiquity 69.264 (1995): 449–458. Print.

Tringham, R. ‘Engendered Places in Prehistory’. Interpretive Archaeology: A Reader. London: Leicester University Press, 2000. 329–357. Print.

Ucko, Peter J. , and Robert Layton. ‘Introduction: Gazing on the Landscape and Encountering the Environment’. The Archaeology and Anthropology of Landscape: Shaping Your Landscape. One world archaeology. London: Routledge, 1999. 1–20. Print.

Ucko, Peter J. and Theoretical Archaeology Group. Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. London: Routledge, 1994. Print.

Urban, Patricia A. and Schortman, Edward M. Archaeological Theory in Practice. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, 2012. Print.

van der Leeuw, S. ‘Dust to Dust: A Transformational View of the Ceramic Cycle’. The Many Dimensions of Pottery: Ceramics in Archaeology and Anthropology. Cingula. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1984. 709–733. Print.

Van Dyke, Ruth and Alcock, Susan E. Archaeologies of Memory. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003. Print.

VanPool, C. S. , and T. L. VanPool. ‘The Scientific Nature of Post-Processualism’. American Antiquity 64.1 (1999): 33–53. Print.

VanPool, T. L., and C. S. VanPool. ‘Postprocessualism and the Nature of Science: A Response to Comments by Hutson and Arnold and Wilkens’. American Antiquity 66.2 (2001): 367–375. Print.

VanPool, Todd L., and Christine S. VanPool. ‘Agency and Evolution: The Role of Intended and Unintended Consequences of Action’. Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2003. 89–113. Print.

VanPool, Todd L. and VanPool, Christine S. Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2003. Print.

Wagstaff, J. Malcolm. Landscape and Culture: Geographical and Archaeological Perspectives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987. Print.

Watson, P.J. . ‘Processualism and After’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2008. 29–38. Print.

Watts, Christopher M. Relational Archaeologies: Humans, Animals, Things. London: Routledge, 2013. Print.

Webmoor, Timothy, and Christopher L. Witmore. ‘Things Are Us! A Commentary on Human/Things Relations under the Banner of a “Social” Archaeology’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 41.1 (2008): 53–70. Web.

Webster, G. . ‘Culture History: A Culture-Historical Approach’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2008. 11–27. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1>.

Wheatley, D. ‘Cumulative Viewshed Analysis: A GIS-Based Method for Investigating Inter-Visibility and Its Archaeological Implication’. Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis, 1995. 171–186. Print.

Wheeler, Robert Eric Mortimer. Archaeology from the Earth. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954. Print.

Whitehouse, R. ‘Cultural and Biological Approaches to the Body in Archaeology: Can They Be Reconciled?" ’. Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast, 2011. 227–244. Print.

Whitehouse, Ruth. ‘Feminism and Archaeology: An Awkward Relationship’. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 9 (1998): 1–7. Print.

Whitley, James. ‘Homer’s Entangled Objects: Narrative, Agency and Personhood In and Out of Iron Age Texts’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 23.03 (2013): 395–416. Web.

Whittle, Alasdair, Alex Bayliss, and Frances Healy. ‘The Timing and Tempo of Change: Examples from the Fourth Millennium Cal. BC in Southern England’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18.01 (2008): 65–70. Web.

Wiessner, P. ‘Style and Changing Relations between the Individual and Society’. The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression. One world archaeology. London: Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic, 1989. 56–63. Print.

Wilkinson, Darryl. ‘The Emperor’s New Body: Personhood, Ontology and the Inka Sovereign’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 23.03 (2013): 417–432. Web.

Wilmott, T. ‘Collapse Theory and the End of Birdoswald’. Theoretical Roman Archaeology: Second Conference Proceedings. Worldwide archaeology series. Aldershot: Avebury, 1995. 59–69. Print.

Wilmott, Tony and English Heritage. Hadrian’s Wall: Archaeological Research by English Heritage 1976-2000. Swindon: English Heritage, 2009. Print.

Winterhalder, Bruce et al. ‘Ideal Free Settlement of California’s Northern Channel Islands’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 29.4 (2010): 469–490. Web.

Witcher, R. ‘The Fabulous Tales of the Common People, Part 1: Representing Hadrian’s Wall’. Public Archaeology 9.3 (2010): 126–152. Web.

Witcher, R., D. P. Tolia-Kelly, and R. Hingley. ‘Archaeologies of Landscape: Excavating the Materialities of Hadrian’s Wall’. Journal of Material Culture 15.1 (2010): 105–128. Web.

Wobst, H. M. ‘Stylistic Behavior Ad Information Exchange’. For the Director: Research Essays in Honor of James B. Griffin. Anthropological papers, Museum of Anthropology. University of Michigan. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, 1977. 317–342. Print.

Wobst, H.M. ‘Style in Archaeology or Archaeologists in Style’. Material Meanings: Critical Approaches to the Interpretation of Material Culture. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1999. 118–132. Print.

Wylie, A. ‘On “Heavily Decomposing Red Herrings”. Scientific Method in Archaeology and the Ladening of Evidence with Theory’. Metaarchaeology: Reflections by Archaeologists and Philosophers. Boston studies in the philosophy of science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992. 145–157. Print.

---. ‘The Reaction against Analogy’. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8 (1985): 63–111. Print.

Wylie, Alison. ‘Gender Theory and the Archaeological Record: Why Is There No Archaeology of Gender?’ Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991. 31–54. Print.

---. ‘The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender’. American Antiquity 57.1 (1992): 15–35. Print.

---. ‘The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender’. American Antiquity 57.1 (1992): 15–35. Print.

Wylie, Alison . ‘Alternative Histories. Epistemic Disunity and Political Integrity’. Making Alternative Histories: The Practice of Archaeology and History in Non-Western Settings. School of American Research advanced seminar series. Santa Fe, N.M: School of American Research Press, 1995. 255–272. Print.

---. ‘The Interpretive Dilemma’. Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology: Essays in the Philosophy, History and Socio-Politics of Archaeology. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. 18–27. Print.

Yates, T. . ‘Frameworks for an Archaeology of the Body’. Interpretative Archaeology. Explorations in anthropology. New York: Berg, 1992. 31–72. Print.

Yoffee, Norman and Sherratt, Andrew. Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda? New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Print.

Zarankin, Andrés, Salerno, Melisa A., and Funari, Pedro Paulo A. Memories from Darkness: Archaeology of Repression and Resistance in Latin America. Contributions to global historical archaeology. London: Springer, 2009. Web. <https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1007/978-1-4419-0679-3>.

Zimmerman, Larry J., Vitelli, Karen D., and Hollowell-Zimmer, Julie. Ethical Issues in Archaeology. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press, 2003. Print.

Bibliography for ARCL2028: Current Issues in Archaeological Theory BETA