1.
Greene, Kevin, Moore, Tom. Archaeology: An Introduction. 5th ed. Routledge; 2010.
2.
Henson D. Doing Archaeology: A Subject Guide for Students. Routledge; 2012. https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9780203109878/archaeology-donald-henson
3.
Hodder I, Hutson S. Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. Third edition. Cambridge University Press; 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814211
4.
Hodder, Ian. The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Blackwell; 1999.
5.
Hodder, Ian. Archaeological Theory Today. Polity; 2001. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
6.
Johnson, Matthew. Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
7.
Trigger, Bruce G. A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2006. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511813016
8.
Urban, Patricia A., Schortman, Edward M. Archaeological Theory in Practice. Left Coast Press; 2012.
9.
Hodder I. Towards a reflexive method. In: The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Blackwell; 1999:80-104.
10.
Johnson M. Common sense is not enough. In: Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2010:1-11.
11.
Redman C. The development of archaeological theory. In: Companion Encyclopedia of Archaeology. Routledge; 1999:48-80.
12.
Bentley R, Alexander M. Introduction on archaeological theories. In: Handbook of Archaeological Theories. AltaMira Press; 2008.
13.
Clarke DL. Archaeology: The loss of innocence. Antiquity. 1973;47(185):6-18.
14.
Margaret W. Conkey. Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 2007;14(3):285-310.
15.
Greene K. Chapter 6: making sense of the past. In: Archaeology: An Introduction. 5th ed. Routledge; 2010:249-312. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203835975
16.
Hodder I. Introduction: a review of contemporary theoretical debate in archaeology. In: Archaeological Theory Today. Polity; 2001:1-13. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
17.
Meskell, Lynn, Preucel, Robert W. A Companion to Social Archaeology. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell Pub. Ltd; 2004. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605
18.
O’Brien, Michael J., Lyman, R. Lee, Schiffer, Michael B. Archaeology as a Process: Processualism and Its Progeny. University of Utah Press; 2005.
19.
Praetzellis, Adrian. Death by Theory: A Tale of Mystery and Archaeological Theory. AltaMira Press; 2000.
20.
Thomas J. Where are we now? Archaeological theory in the 1990s. In: Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. Routledge; 1994:343-362.
21.
Trigger, Bruce G. A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2006. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511813016
22.
VanPool, Todd L., VanPool, Christine S. Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory. Vol Foundations of archaeological inquiry. University of Utah Press; 2003.
23.
Yoffee, Norman, Sherratt, Andrew. Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda? Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1993.
24.
Childe VG. What happens in prehistory? In: Piecing Together the Past: The Interpretation of Archaeological Data. Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1956:135-158. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c1eea4f3-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
25.
Hawkes C. Wenner-Gren Foundation Supper Conference - Archaeological theory and method: Some suggestiongs from the Old World. American Anthropologist. 1954;56(2):155-168. https://www.jstor.org/stable/664357
26.
Trigger BG. Culture-historical archaeology. In: A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2006:211-313.
27.
Childe VG. Preface and chapter 1. In: The Danube in Prehistory. Clarendon Press; 1929:v-xii-1-7.
28.
Gordon Childe V. Changing aims and methods in prehistory. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 1935;1:1-15. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2028_47033.pdf
29.
Clark, Grahame. Archaeology and Society. 3rd ed. Methuen; 1960.
30.
Diaz-Andreu M. Britain and the Other: the archaeology of imperialism. In: History, Nationhood, and the Question of Britain. Palgrave Macmillan; 2004:227-241.
31.
Díaz-Andreu García, Margarita. A World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology: Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past. Oxford University Press; 2007. https://academic-oup-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/40265
32.
Fagan, Brian M. Grahame Clark: An Intellectual Biography of an Archaeologist. Westview; 2001.
33.
Harris, David R., Childe, V. Gordon, V. Gordon Childe Centennial Conference, University College, London, Prehistoric Society (London, England). The Archaeology of V. Gordon Childe: Contemporary Perspectives : Proceedings of the V. Gordon Childe Centennial Conference Held at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 8-9 May 1992 under the Auspices of the Institute of Archaeology and the Prehistoric Society. UCL Press; 1994.
34.
Hingley R. Chapters 9 and 10. In: Roman Officers and English Gentlemen: The Imperial Origins of Roman Archaeology. Routledge; 2000.
35.
Jones S. Chapter 2. In: The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. Routledge; 1997.
36.
Lyman, R. Lee, O’Brien, Michael J., Dunnell, Robert C. The Rise and Fall of Culture History. Plenum Press; 1997.
37.
Lyman RL, O’Brien MJ. A history of normative theory in Americanist archaeology. Journal of archaeological method and theory. 2004;11(4):369-396.
38.
Patterson, Thomas Carl. Marx’s Ghost: Conversations with Archaeologists. Berg; 2003.
39.
Renfrew C. Beyond diffusion. In: Before Civilization: The Radiocarbon Revolution and Prehistoric Europe. Pimlico; 1999:109-119.
40.
Schnapp A. Between antiquarians and archaeologists - Continuities and ruptures. Antiquity. 2002;76(291):134-140.
41.
Shennan SJ. Introduction: archaeological approaches to cultural identity. In: Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity. Vol One world archaeology. Routledge; 1994:1-32.
42.
Spaulding AC. Statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types. American Antiquity. 1953;18(4):305-313.
43.
Taylor WW. Chapter 6. In: A Study of Archaeology. Vol Memoir series of the American Anthropological Association. American Anthropological Association; 1948.
44.
Webster G. Culture history: a culture-historical approach. In: Handbook of Archaeological Theories. AltaMira Press; 2008:11-27. https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1
45.
Wheeler, Robert Eric Mortimer. Archaeology from the Earth. Clarendon Press; 1954.
46.
Binford LR. Archaeological perspectives. In: New Perspectives in Archeology. Aldine; 1968:5-32.
47.
Binford LR. A consideration of archaeological research design. American Antiquity. 1964;29(4):425-441.
48.
Trigger BG. Current trends in American archaeology. In: Time and Traditions: Essays in Archaeological Interpretation. Edinburgh University Press; 1978:2-18.
49.
Binford LR. Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity. 1962;28(2):217-225.
50.
Clarke DL. Archaeology: The loss of innocence. Antiquity. 1973;47(185):6-18.
51.
Clarke, David L., Chapman, Bob. Analytical Archaeology. 2nd ed. Methuen; 1978.
52.
Clark G. Economic approach to prehistory. In: Economic Prehistory: Papers on Archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1989:149-168.
53.
Dunnell RC. Five decades of American archaeology. In: American Archaeology, Past and Future: A Celebration of the Society for American Archaeology, 1935-1985. Smithsonian Institution Press; 1986.
54.
Flannery KV. Culture history vs. culture process: A Debate in American archaeology. Scientific American. 1967;2(2):119-122.
55.
Flannery KV. Archaeological systems theory and early Mesoamerica. In: Anthropological Archeology in the Americas. The Anthropological Society of Washington; 1968:67-87.
56.
Lyman RL. What is the `process’ in cultural process and in processual archaeology? Anthropological Theory. 2007;7(2):217-250. doi:10.1177/1463499607077299
57.
David J. Meltzer. Paradigms and the Nature of Change in American Archaeology. American Antiquity. 1979;44(4):644-657.
58.
O’Brien, Michael J., Lyman, R. Lee, Schiffer, Michael B. Archaeology as a Process: Processualism and Its Progeny. University of Utah Press; 2005.
59.
Plog F. Laws, systems of laws and the explanation of observed variation. In: The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory. Duckworth; 1973:649-661.
60.
Redman CL. Distinguished lecture in archaeology: In defence of the seventies - The adolescence of New Archaeology. American Anthropologist. 1991;93(2):295-307.
61.
Renfrew C. Culture systems and the multiplier effect. In: The Emergence of Civilisation: The Cyclades and the Aegean in the Third Millennium B.C. Vol Studies in prehistory. Methuen; 1972:19-44.
62.
Renfrew C. Monuments, mobilization and social organization in Neolithic Wessex. In: The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory. Duckworth; 1973:539-558.
63.
Taylor WW. Chapter 6. In: A Study of Archaeology. Vol Memoir series of the American Anthropological Association. American Anthropological Association; 1948.
64.
Taylor WW. Old wine and new skins: A contemporary parable. In: Contemporary Archaeology: A Guide to Theory and Contributions. Feffer & Simons; 1972:28-33.
65.
Trigger BG. Chapter 7. In: A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016
66.
Trigger BG. Aims in prehistoric archaeology. Antiquity. 1970;44(173):26-37.
67.
Watson PJ. Processualism and after. In: Handbook of Archaeological Theories. AltaMira Press; 2008:29-38.
68.
Binford LR. Relics to artifacts and monuments to assemblages: changing conceptual frameworks. In: Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths. Vol Studies in archaeology. Academic Press; 1981:3-20.
69.
Flannery KV. The Golden Marshalltown: A Parable for the Archeology of the 1980s. American Anthropologist. 1982;84(2):265-278. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1982.84.2.02a00010
70.
Schiffer MB. Archaeological context and systemic context. American Antiquity. 1972;37(2):156-165.
71.
Arnold P. Back to basics: the middle-range program as pragmatic archaeology. In: Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory. Vol Foundations of archaeological inquiry. University of Utah Press; 2003:55-66.
72.
Binford LR. General introduction. In: For Theory Building in Archaeology: Essays on Faunal Remains, Aquatic Resources, Spatial Analysis and Systemic Modeling. Vol Studies in archeology. Academic Press; 1977:1-10.
73.
Binford LR. Behavioural archaeological and the ‘Pompeii Premise’ . Journal of Anthropological Research. 1981;37(3):195-208.
74.
Binford, Lewis Roberts. Constructing Frames of Reference: An Analytical Method for Archaeological Theory Building Using Hunter-Gatherer and Environmental Data Sets. University of California Press; 2001.
75.
Butzer, Karl W. Archaeology as Human Ecology: Method and Theory for a Contextual Approach. Cambridge University Press; 1982.
76.
Courbin, Paul. What Is Archaeology?: An Essay on the Nature of Archaeological Research. University of Chicago Press; 1988.
77.
Robert C. Dunnell. The Harvey Lecture Series. Science, Social Science, and Common Sense: The Agonizing Dilemma of Modern Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Research. 1982;38(1):1-25.
78.
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1983;2(2):117-163. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7
79.
Higgs ES, Vita-Finzi C. Prehistoric economies: A territorial approach. In: Papers in Economic Prehistory: Studies by Members and Associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture. Cambridge University Press; 1972:27-36.
80.
LaMotta V, Schiffer M. Behavioral archaeology. Towards a new synthesis. In: Archaeological Theory Today. Polity; 2001. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
81.
Leone, Mark P. Contemporary Archaeology: A Guide to Theory and Contributions. Feffer & Simons; 1972.
82.
Patrik LE. Is there an archaeological record? Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 1985;8:27-62.
83.
Price BJ. Cultural Materialism: A Theoretical Review. American Antiquity. 1982;47(4):709-741.
84.
Renfrew, Colin, Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects. The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory. Duckworth; 1973.
85.
Schiffer, Michael B. Behavioral Archaeology. Vol Studies in archaeology. Academic Press; 1976.
86.
Schiffer MB. Is there a ‘Pompeii Premise’ in archaeology? Journal of Anthropological Research. 1985;41(1):18-41.
87.
Schiffer, Michael B. Behavioral Archaeology: First Principles. Vol Foundations of archaeological inquiry. University of Utah Press; 1995.
88.
Schiffer, Michael B. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. University of New Mexico Press; 1987.
89.
Shott MJ. Status and role of formation theory in contemporary archaeological practice. Journal of archaeological research. 1998;6(4):299-329.
90.
Trigger BG. Expanding middle-range theory. Antiquity. 1995;69(264):449-458.
91.
Wylie A. The reaction against analogy. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 1985;8:63-111.
92.
Hodder I. Chapter 1: The problem. In: Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2003:1-19.
93.
Leone M. Towards a critical archaeology. Current Anthropology. 1987;28(3):283-302.
94.
Shanks M, Tilley CY. Chapter 3: facts and values in archaeology. In: Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. Routledge; 1992:46-67.
95.
Wylie A. The interpretive dilemma. In: Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology: Essays in the Philosophy, History and Socio-Politics of Archaeology. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1989:18-27.
96.
Review by: Lewis R. Binford. American Antiquity. Vol. 53(No. 4):875-876.
97.
Cowgill GL. Distinguished lecture in archaeology: Beyond criticizing New Archaeology. American Anthropologist, New Series. 1993;95(3):551-573.
98.
Earle et. al. TK. Processual archaeology and the radical critique. Current Anthropology. 1987;28(4):501-538.
99.
Hodder I. Theoretical archaeology: A reactionary view. In: Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1982:92-121.
100.
Hodder I. Postprocessual archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 1985;8:1-26.
101.
Johnson M. Chapters 6 and 7. In: Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
102.
Leone M. Symbolic, structural and critical archaeology. In: American Archaeology, Past and Future: A Celebration of the Society for American Archaeology, 1935-1985. Smithsonian Institution Press; 1986:415-438.
103.
Shanks M, Tilley CY. Archaeology and the politics of theory. In: Social Theory and Archaeology. Polity in association with Blackwell; 1987:186-208.
104.
Shanks, Michael, Tilley, Christopher Y. Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. Routledge; 1992.
105.
Shanks M. Post-processual archaeology and after. In: Handbook of Archaeological Theories. AltaMira Press; 2008:133-144.
106.
Tilley CY. Ideology and the legitimation of power in the middle Neolithic of southern Sweden. In: Ideology, Power and Prehistory. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1984:111-145. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511897443
107.
Trigger BG. Distinguished lecture in archaeology: Constraint and freedom - A new synthesis for archaeological explanation. American Anthropologist. 1991;93(3):551-569.
108.
Trigger BG. Archaeology at the Crossroads: What’s New? Annual Review of Anthropology. 1984;13(1):275-300. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.001423
109.
Trigger BG. Chapter 8: Processualism and post-processualism. In: A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016
110.
Wylie A. On ‘heavily decomposing red herrings’. Scientific method in archaeology and the ladening of evidence with theory. In: Metaarchaeology: Reflections by Archaeologists and Philosophers. Vol Boston studies in the philosophy of science. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1992:145-157.
111.
Shanks M, Hodder I. Processual, postprocessual and interpretive archaeologies. In: Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past. Routledge; 1994:3-29.
112.
Shanks M, Tilley C. Comments on Archaeology into the 1990s. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 1989;22(1):12-54. https://www-tandfonline-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/toc/sarc20/22/1?nav=tocList
113.
Barrett, John C. Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell; 1993.
114.
Brück J. Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory. Archaeological Dialogues. 2005;12(01):45-72. doi:10.1017/S1380203805001583
115.
Buchli, Victor, Lucas, Gavin, Cox, Margaret. Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past. Routledge; 2001.
116.
Chippindale C. Ambition, deference, discrepancy, comsumption: the intellectual background to a post-processual archaeology. In: Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda?. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1993:27-36.
117.
Dobres, Marcia-Anne. Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell Publishers; 2000.
118.
Dowson TA. Homosexuality, queer theory and archaeology. In: Interpretive Archaeology: A Reader. Leicester University Press; 2000:283-289.
119.
Gero JM, Wright M. Tensions, pluralities and engendering archaeology: An introduction to Women and Prehistory. In: Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell; 1991:3-30.
120.
Hegmon M. Setting theoretical egos aside: Issues and theory in North American archaeology. American Antiquity. 2003;68(2):213-243.
121.
Hodder I. Interpretive archaeology and its role. American Antiquity. 1991;56(1):7-18.
122.
Hodder I. Material practice, symbolism and ideology. In: Theory and Practice in Archaeology. Vol Material cultures. Routledge; 1992:201-212.
123.
Hodder, Ian. Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past. Routledge; 1994.
124.
Hodder I, Karlsson H, Olsen B. 40 Years of Theoretical Engagement: A Conversation with Ian Hodder. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 2008;41(1):26-42. doi:10.1080/00293650802181154
125.
LaMotta V, Schiffer M. Behavioral archaeology. Towards a new synthesis. In: Archaeological Theory Today. Rev. and updated ed. Polity; 2012:14-64.
126.
Mackenzie, Iain M. Archaeological Theory: Progress or Posture? Vol Worldwide archaeology series. Avebury; 1994.
127.
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class et Cetera in Ancient Egypt. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell; 1999.
128.
Preucel RW. The postprocessual condition. Journal of Archaeological Research. 1995;3(2):147-175.
129.
Renfrew C. Towards a cognitive archaeology. In: The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1994:3-12.
130.
Shanks M. Post-processual archaeology and after. In: Handbook of Archaeological Theories. AltaMira Press; 2008:133-144. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780759113602
131.
Tarlow, Sarah, West, Susie. The Familiar Past?: Archaeologies of Later Historical Britain. Routledge; 1999.
132.
Thomas J. Where are we now? Archaeological theory in the 1990s. In: Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. Routledge; 1994:343-362.
133.
Thomas, Julian. Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretative Archaeology. Routledge; 1996.
134.
Tilley C. Interpreting material culture. In: The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression. Vol One world archaeology. Routledge; 1989:185-194.
135.
Tilley, Christopher Y. Interpretative Archaeology. Vol Explorations in anthropology. Berg; 1992.
136.
Trigger BG. Post‐processual developments in Anglo‐American archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 1991;24(2):65-76.
137.
Trigger BG. Hyper-relativism, responsibility and the Social Sciences. In: Artifacts & Ideas: Essays in Archaeology. Transaction; 2003:113-131.
138.
Trigger BG. Chapter 9 and 10. In: A History of Archaeological Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813016
139.
Michelle Hegmon. Setting Theoretical Egos Aside: Issues and Theory in North American Archaeology. American Antiquity. 2003;68(2):213-243.
140.
Johnson M. On the nature of theoretical archaeology and archaeological theory. Archaeological Dialogues. 2006;13(2):117-132. doi:10.1017/S138020380621208X
141.
Kristiansen K. Genes versus agents: A discussion of the widening theoretical gap in archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues. 2004;11(2):77-99. doi:10.1017/S1380203805211509
142.
Barrett JC. The material constitution of humanness. Archaeological Dialogues. 2014;21(01):65-74. doi:10.1017/S1380203814000105
143.
Bentley A, Maschner HDG. Complexity theory. In: Handbook of Archaeological Theories. AltaMira Press; 2008:245-270.
144.
Bintliff, J. L., Pearce, Mark. The Death of Archaeological Theory? Oxbow Books; 2011. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvh1dk87
145.
Cochrane, Ethan E., Gardner, Andrew. Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Vol Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast; 2011.
146.
Funari, Pedro Paulo A., Zarankin, Andrés, Stovel, Emily. Global Archaeological Theory: Contextual Voices and Contemporary Thoughts. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2005.
147.
Zarankin, Andrés, Salerno, Melisa A., Funari, Pedro Paulo A. Memories from Darkness: Archaeology of Repression and Resistance in Latin America. Vol Contributions to global historical archaeology. Springer; 2009. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1007/978-1-4419-0679-3
148.
Gaydarska B. A brief history of TAG. Antiquity. 2009;83(322):1152-1162.
149.
Michelle Hegmon. No More Theory Wars: A Response to Moss. American Antiquity. 2005;70(3):588-590.
150.
Hodder I. Introduction: contemporary theoretical debate in archaeology. In: Archaeological Theory Today. 2nd ed. Polity; 2012:1-14.
151.
Lydon, Jane, Rizvi, Uzma Z. Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology. Vol World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Left Coast Press; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=911816
152.
Knappett, Carl. An Archaeology of Interaction: Network Perspectives on Material Culture and Society. Oxford University Press; 2011. https://academic.oup.com/book/1407
153.
Mizoguchi, Kōji. Archaeology, Society and Identity in Modern Japan. Vol Cambridge studies in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 2006.
154.
Madonna L. Moss. Rifts in the Theoretical Landscape of Archaeology in the United States: A Comment on Hegmon and Watkins. American Antiquity. 2005;70(3):581-587.
155.
Olsen B. Symmetical archaeology. In: Archaeological Theory Today. 2nd ed. Polity; 2012:208-228.
156.
Pauketat TR. Practice and history in archaeology: An emerging paradigm. Anthropological Theory. 2001;1(1):73-98. doi:10.1177/146349960100100105
157.
Preucel RW, Mrozowski SA. The new pragmatism. In: Contemporary Archaeology in Theory: The New Pragmatism. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2010:3-49.
158.
Robb J, Pauketat TR. Big Histories, Human Lives: Tackling Problems of Scale in Archaeology. Vol School for Advanced Research advanced seminar series. School for Advanced Research Press; 2013.
159.
Michael Shanks. Symmetrical Archaeology. World Archaeology. 2007;39(4):589-596.
160.
Smith, Laurajane. Archaeological Theory and the Politics of Cultural Heritage. Routledge; 2004.
161.
Spriggs M. Ethnographic parallels and the denial of history. World Archaeology. 2008;40(4):538-552. doi:10.1080/00438240802453161
162.
Bruce G. Trigger. Archaeology and Epistemology: Dialoguing across the Darwinian Chasm. American Journal of Archaeology. 1998;102(1):1-34.
163.
Ucko, Peter J., Theoretical Archaeology Group. Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. Routledge; 1994.
164.
Watts CM. Relational Archaeologies: Humans, Animals, Things. Routledge; 2013.
165.
Webmoor T, Witmore CL. Things Are Us! A Commentary on Human/Things Relations under the Banner of a ‘Social’ Archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 2008;41(1):53-70. doi:10.1080/00293650701698423
166.
Andrews G, Barrett JC, Lewis JSC. Interpretation not record: The practice of archaeology. Antiquity. 2000;74(285):525-530.
167.
Hodder I. Towards a reflexive method. In: The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Blackwell; 1999:80-104.
168.
Lucas G. Introduction: archaeology and the field. In: Critical Approaches to Fieldwork: Contemporary and Historical Archaeological Practice. Routledge; 2001:1-17.
169.
Roskams S. Future prospects. In: Excavation. Vol Cambridge manuals in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 2001:267-290.
170.
Bender B, Tilley CY, Anderson E, Hamilton S. Chapters 1 and 3. In: Stone Worlds: Narrative and Reflexivity in Landscape Archaeology. Vol Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast Press; 2007. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14615901840004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
171.
Berggren A, Hodder I. Social practice, method and some problems of field archaeology. American Antiquity. 2003;68(3):421-434.
172.
Binford LR. A consideration of archaeological research design. American Antiquity. 1964;29(4):425-441.
173.
Chadwick A. Post-processualism, professionalization and archaeological methodologies. Towards reflexive and radical practice. Archaeological Dialogues. 2003;10(1):97-117. doi:10.1017/S1380203803001107
174.
Collis, John. Digging up the Past: An Introduction to Archaeological Excavation. Sutton; 2001.
175.
Conolly J. Catalhoyuk and the archaeological object. In: Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Çatalhöyük : By Members of the Çatalhöyük Team. Vol McDonald Institute monographs. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 2000:51-56. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=533279b1-a506-e811-80cd-005056af4099
176.
Edgeworth, Matt. Acts of Discovery: An Ethnography of Archaeological Practice. Vol BAR international series. Archaeopress; 2003.
177.
Edgeworth, Matt. Ethnographies of Archaeological Practice: Cultural Encounters, Material Transformations. Vol Worlds of archaeology series. Altamira Press; 2006.
178.
Gero JM. Archaeological practice and gendered encounters with field data. In: Gender and Archaeology. University of Pennsylvania Press; 1996:251-280.
179.
Hamilton S. Lost in translation? A comment on the excavation report. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology. 1999;10:1-8. doi:10.5334/pia.140
180.
Hamilton S, Whitehouse R, Brown K, Combes P, Herring E, Thomas MS. Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach. European Journal of Archaeology. 2006;9(1):31-71. doi:10.1177/1461957107077704
181.
Hassan FA. Beyond the surface: Comments on Hodder’s ‘reflexive excavation methodology’. Antiquity. 1997;71(274):1020-1025.
182.
Hodder I. Writing archaeology: site reports in context. In: Theory and Practice in Archaeology. Vol Material cultures. Routledge; 1992:263-274.
183.
Hodder I. Always momentary, fluid and flexible: Towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity. 1997;71(273):691-700.
184.
Jones, Andrew. Archaeological Theory and Scientific Practice. Vol Topics in contemporary archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 2001.
185.
Lucas G. Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge University Press; 2012. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511845772
186.
Moshenska, Gabriel, Dhanjal, Sarah. Community Archaeology: Themes, Methods and Practices. Oxbow; 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1154191
187.
Papaconstantinou, Demetra. Deconstructing Context: A Critical Approach to Archaeological Practice. Oxbow; 2006.
188.
Parker Pearson M, Ramilisonina. Stonehenge for the ancestors: The stones pass on the message. Antiquity. 1998;72(276):308-326.
189.
Scarre G, Coningham R. Appropriating the Past: Philosophical Perspectives on the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 2013. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781139026932
190.
Quirke, Stephen. Hidden Hands: Egyptian Workforces in Petrie Excavation Archives, 1880-1924. Vol Duckworth egyptology. Gerald Duckworth; 2010.
191.
Shanks M, McGuire RH. The craft of archaeology. American Antiquity. 1996;61(1):75-88.
192.
Tilley C. Excavation as Theatre. Antiquity. 1989;63(239):275-280.
193.
Parker Pearson M, Ramilisonina. Stonehenge for the ancestors: The stones pass on the message. Antiquity. 1998;72(276):308-326.
194.
Parker Pearson et. al. M. Who was buried at Stonehenge? Antiquity. 2009;83(319):23-39.
195.
Pearson MP. Materializing Stonehenge: The Stonehenge Riverside Project and New Discoveries. Journal of Material Culture. 2006;11(1-2):227-261. doi:10.1177/1359183506063024
196.
Renfrew C. Monuments, mobilization and social organisation in Neolithic Wessex. In: The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory. Duckworth; 1973:539-558.
197.
Atkinson, R. J. C. Stonehenge. Vol A pelican book. Penquin Books in association with Hamish Hamilton; 1960.
198.
Bender B. Theorising landscapes, and the prehistoric landscape of Stonehenge. Man. 1992;27(4):735-755.
199.
Bender, Barbara, Aitken, Paul. Stonehenge: Making Space. Vol Materializing culture. Berg; 1998.
200.
Bradley, Richard. The Significance of Monuments: On the Shaping of Human Experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe. Routledge; 1998.
201.
Chippindale, Christopher. Stonehenge Complete. New and expanded [3rd] ed. Thames & Hudson; 2004.
202.
Chippindale, Christopher. Who Owns Stonehenge? Batsford; 1990.
203.
Cleal, Rosamund, Walker, K. E., Montague, R., English Heritage. Stonehenge in Its Landscape: Twentieth-Century Excavations. Vol Archaeological report / English Heritage. English Heritage; 1995.
204.
Renfrew, Colin, Cunliffe, Barry W., British Academy. Science and Stonehenge. Vol Proceedings of the British Academy. Oxford University Press for the British Academy; 1997.
205.
Parker Pearson et. al. M. The age of Stonehenge. Antiquity. 2007;81(313):617-639.
206.
Parker Pearson et. al. M. Stonehenge, its river and its landscape: Unravelling the mysteries of a prehistoric sacred place. Archäologischer Anzeiger: Beiblatt zum Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. 2006;1:237-258.
207.
Richards, Julian C., English Heritage. English Heritage Book of Stonehenge. B. T. Batsford Ltd./ English Heritage; 1991.
208.
Richards, Julian C., Allen, Mike, English Heritage. The Stonehenge Environs Project. Vol Archaeological report. Historical Buildings & Monuments Commission for England; 1990.
209.
James S. Roman archaeology: Crisis and revolution. Antiquity. 2003;77(295):178-184. http://search.proquest.com/docview/217561304?accountid=14511
210.
Witcher R, Tolia-Kelly DP, Hingley R. Archaeologies of Landscape: Excavating the Materialities of Hadrian’s Wall. Journal of Material Culture. 2010;15(1):105-128. doi:10.1177/1359183510355228
211.
Andrén, Anders, Crozier, Alan. Between Artifacts and Texts: Historical Archaeology in Global Perspective. Vol Contributions to global historical archaeology. Plenum Press; 1998.
212.
Dyson, Stephen L. In Pursuit of Ancient Pasts: A History of Classical Archaeology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Yale University Press; 2006. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1npzcm
213.
Frere SS. Roman Britain since Haverfield and Richmond. History and Archaeology Review. 1988;3:31-36.
214.
Gardner A. Seeking a material turn: the artefactuality of the Roman Empire. In: TRAC 2002: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference Which Took Place at the University of Kent at Canterbury 5-6 April 2002. Oxbow Books; 2003:1-13.
215.
Hingley, Richard. Roman Officers and English Gentlemen: The Imperial Origins of Roman Archaeology. Routledge; 2000.
216.
Hingley R. Hadrian’s Wall in theory: pursuing new agendas. In: Understanding Hadrian’s Wall: Papers from a Conference Held at South Shields, 3rd-5th November 2006, to Mark the Publication of the 14th Edition of the Handbook to the Roman Wall. Arbeia Society; 2008:25-28.
217.
Hingley R. ‘The most ancient Boundary between England and Scotland’: Genealogies of the Roman Walls. Classical Receptions Journal. 2010;2(1):25-43. doi:10.1093/crj/clq001
218.
Hodder I. Bridging the divide: a commentary on theoretical Roman archaeology. In: Theoretical Roman Archaeology: First Conference Proceedings. Vol Wordwide archaeology series. Avebury; 1993:xiii-xix.
219.
Ian Hodder and Mark Hassall. The Non-Random Spacing of Romano-British Walled Towns. Man. 1971;6(3):391-407.
220.
James S. Writing the Legions: The Development and Future of Roman Military Studies in Britain. Archaeological Journal. 2002;159(1):1-58. doi:10.1080/00665983.2002.11020514
221.
James, Simon, Millett, Martin, Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, Council for British Archaeology. Britons and Romans: Advancing an Archaeological Agenda. Vol CBA research report. Council for British Archaeology; 2001.
222.
Johnson MH. Rethinking historical archaeology. In: Historical Archaeology: Back from the Edge. Vol One world archaeology. Routledge; 1999:23-36.
223.
Moore T. Detribalizing the later prehistoric past: Concepts of tribes in Iron Age and Roman studies. Journal of Social Archaeology. 2011;11(3):334-360. doi:10.1177/1469605311403861
224.
Nesbitt C, Tolia-Kelly D. Hadrian’s Wall: Embodied archaeologies of the linear monument. Journal of Social Archaeology. 2009;9(3):368-390. doi:10.1177/1469605309338428
225.
Glenn R. Storey. Archaeology and Roman Society: Integrating Textual and Archaeological Data. Journal of Archaeological Research. 1999;7(3):203-248.
226.
Mason, David J. P., Symonds, Matthew F. A. Frontiers of Knowledge: A Research Framework for Hadrian’s Wall, Part of the Frontiers of the Roman Empire World Heritage Site. Durham County Council and Durham University; 2009.
227.
Cooper, Nicholas, Webster, Jane, University of Leicester. Roman Imperialism: Post-Colonial Perspectives. Vol Leicester archaeology monographs. School of Archaeological Studies, University of Leicester; 1996.
228.
Wilmott T. Collapse theory and the end of Birdoswald. In: Theoretical Roman Archaeology: Second Conference Proceedings. Vol Worldwide archaeology series. Avebury; 1995:59-69.
229.
Wilmott, Tony, English Heritage. Hadrian’s Wall: Archaeological Research by English Heritage 1976-2000. English Heritage; 2009.
230.
Witcher R. The Fabulous Tales of the Common People, Part 1: Representing Hadrian’s Wall. Public Archaeology. 2010;9(3):126-152. doi:10.1179/146551810X12822101587138
231.
Greg Woolf. The Present State and Future Scope of Roman Archaeology: A Comment. American Journal of Archaeology. 2004;108(3):417-428.
232.
Tim Ingold. The Temporality of the Landscape. World Archaeology. 1993;25(2):152-174. http://www.jstor.org/stable/124811
233.
Lucas G. Time and Archaeological Event. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2008;18(01):59-65. doi:10.1017/S095977430800005X
234.
Mytum H. Materiality and memory: an archaeological perspective on the popular adoption of linear time in Britain. Antiquity. 2007;81(312):381-396. http://search.proquest.com/docview/217581355?accountid=14511
235.
Adam B. Perceptions of time. In: Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Vol Routledge world reference. [New ed.]. Routledge; 2002:503-526. https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490
236.
Adam, Barbara. Timewatch: The Social Analysis of Time. Polity Press; 1995.
237.
G. N. Bailey. Concepts of Time in Quaternary Prehistory. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1983;12:165-192. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155645
238.
Bailey G. Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2007;26(2):198-223. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2006.08.002
239.
Barrett, John C. Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell; 1993.
240.
Rosen, Ralph Mark, University of Pennsylvania. Time and Temporality in the Ancient World. University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology; 2004.
241.
Bintliff, J. L. The Annales School and Archaeology. Leicester University Press; 1991.
242.
Borić, Dušan. Archaeology and Memory. Oxbow Books; 2010.
243.
Bradley, Richard. The Past in Prehistoric Societies. Routledge; 2002.
244.
Gardner A. Time and empire in the Roman world. Journal of Social Archaeology. 2012;12(2):145-166. doi:10.1177/1469605312439971
245.
Gell, Alfred. The Anthropology of Time: Cultural Constructions of Temporal Maps and Images. Vol Explorations in anthropology. Berg; 1992.
246.
Gosden, Chris. Social Being and Time. Blackwell; 1994.
247.
Hannah, Robert. Time in Antiquity. Vol Sciences of antiquity. Routledge; 2009.
248.
Harding J. Rethinking the Great Divide: Long‐Term Structural History and the Temporality of Event. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 2005;38(2):88-101. doi:10.1080/00293650510032707
249.
Holdaway, Simon, Wandsnider, LuAnn. Time in Archaeology: Time Perspectivism Revisited. University of Utah Press; 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=3443820
250.
Karlsson, Håkan. It’s about Time: The Concept of Time in Archaeology. Bricoleur; 2001.
251.
Redman, Charles L. Social Archeology: Beyond Subsistence and Dating. Vol Studies in archeology. Academic Press; 1978.
252.
Lucas, Gavin. The Archaeology of Time. Vol Themes in archaeology. Routledge; 2005.
253.
Nancy D. Munn. The Cultural Anthropology of Time: A Critical Essay. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1992;21:93-123. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155982
254.
Murray, Tim, World Archaeological Congress. Time and Archaeology. Vol One world archaeology. Routledge; 1999.
255.
Nanni G. Time, empire and resistance in settler-colonial Victoria. Time & Society. 2011;20(1):5-33. doi:10.1177/0961463X10369765
256.
Shanks M, Tilley C. Abstract and Substantial Time. Archaeological Review From Cambridge. 1987;6(1):32-41.
257.
Mackenzie, Iain M. Archaeological Theory: Progress or Posture? Vol Worldwide archaeology series. Avebury; 1994.
258.
Thomas, Julian. Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretative Archaeology. Routledge; 1996.
259.
Van Dyke, Ruth, Alcock, Susan E. Archaeologies of Memory. Blackwell; 2003.
260.
Whittle A, Bayliss A, Healy F. The Timing and Tempo of Change: Examples from the Fourth Millennium cal. BC in Southern England. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2008;18(01):65-70. doi:10.1017/S0959774308000061
261.
David B, Thomas J. Landscape archaeology: Introduction. In: Handbook of Landscape Archaeology. Vol World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Left Coast Press; 2008:27-43. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1
262.
Hamilton S. The ambiguity of landscape: discussing points of relatedness in concepts and methods. In: Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Vol Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast; 2011:263-280.
263.
Thomas J. Archaeologies of place and landscape. In: Archaeological Theory Today. Rev. and updated ed. Polity; 2012:165-186.
264.
Tilley CY. Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives. In: A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths, and Monuments. Vol Explorations in anthropology. Berg; 1994:7-34.
265.
Ashmore W, Knapp AB. Archaeological landscapes: constructed, conceptualised, ideational. In: Archaeologies of Landscape: Contemporary Perspectives. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell Publishers; 1999:1-30.
266.
Barrett J. The mythical landscapes of the British Iron Age. In: Archaeologies of Landscape: Contemporary Perspectives. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell Publishers; 1999:253-265.
267.
Bender B. Theorising landscapes, and the prehistoric landscape of Stonehenge. Man. 1992;27(4):735-755.
268.
Bender B, Tilley CY, Anderson E, Hamilton S. Chapters 1 and 3. In: Stone Worlds: Narrative and Reflexivity in Landscape Archaeology. Vol Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast Press; 2007. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14615901840004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
269.
Bender B, Hamilton S, Tilley C. Leskernick: Stone Worlds; Alternative Narratives; Nested Landscapes. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 1997;63:147-178. doi:10.1017/S0079497X00002413
270.
Brück J. Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory. Archaeological Dialogues. 2005;12(1):45-72. doi:10.1017/S1380203805001583
271.
Thomas, Julian, David, Bruno. Handbook of Landscape Archaeology. Vol World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Left Coast Press; 2008. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1
272.
Fleming A. Phenomenology and the Megaliths of Wales: A Dreaming Too Far? Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 1999;18(2):119-125. doi:10.1111/1468-0092.00074
273.
Fleming A. Post-processual landscape archaeology: A critique. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2006;16(3):267-280. doi:10.1017/S0959774306000163
274.
Gheorghiu D, Nash G. Place as Material Culture: Objects, Geographies and the Construction of Time. Cambridge Scholars Pub; 2013.
275.
Hamilton et al. S. Quarried away: thinking about landscapes of megalithic construction on Rapa Nui (Easter Island). In: Handbook of Landscape Archaeology. Vol World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Left Coast Press; 2008:176-186. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1
276.
Hamilton S, Whitehouse R, Brown K, Combes P, Herring E, Thomas MS. Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach. European Journal of Archaeology. 2006;9(1):31-71. doi:10.1177/1461957107077704
277.
Wagstaff, J. Malcolm. Landscape and Culture: Geographical and Archaeological Perspectives. Basil Blackwell; 1987.
278.
Ingold T. The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology. 1993;25(2):152-174.
279.
Lake M. Viewing space. World Archaeology. 2007;39(1):1-3.
280.
Llobera M. Exploring the topography of mind: GIS, social space and archaeology. Antiquity. 1996;70(269):612-622.
281.
McGlade J. Archaeology and the evolution of cultural landscapes: towards an interdisciplinary agenda. In: The Archaeology and Anthropology of Landscape: Shaping Your Landscape. Vol One world archaeology. Routledge; 1999:458-482.
282.
Thomas JS. The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape. In: Landscape: Politics and Perspectives. Vol Explorations in anthropology. Berg; 1993:19-48.
283.
Tilley C, Bennett W. An archaeology of super-natural places: the case of West Penwith. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2001;7(2):335-362.
284.
Tilley CY. The powers of rocks: Topography and monument construction on Bodmin Moor. World Archaeology. 1996;28(2):161-176.
285.
Tilley C. Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2004;14(2):185-203. doi:10.1017/S0959774304000125
286.
Tilley CY. Phenomenological approaches to landscape archaeology. In: Handbook of Landscape Archaeology. Vol World Archaeological Congress research handbooks in archaeology. Left Coast Press; 2008:271-276. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315427737.ch1
287.
Ucko PJ, Layton R. Introduction: gazing on the landscape and encountering the environment. In: The Archaeology and Anthropology of Landscape: Shaping Your Landscape. Vol One world archaeology. Routledge; 1999:1-20.
288.
Wheatley D. Cumulative viewshed analysis: a GIS-based method for investigating inter-visibility and its archaeological implication. In: Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective. Taylor & Francis; 1995:171-186.
289.
Binford LR. Interassemblage variability: The Mousterian and the functional argument. In: Working at Archaeology. Vol Studies in archeology. Academic Press; 1983:131-153. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ffc747cb-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
290.
Dobres MA, Hoffman CR. Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 1994;1(3):211-258.
291.
Schiffer MB, Skibo JM. The explanation of artifact variability. American Antiquity. 1997;62(1):27-50.
292.
SILLAR B, TITE MS. THE CHALLENGE OF ‘TECHNOLOGICAL CHOICES’FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE APPROACHES IN ARCHAEOLOGY. Archaeometry. 2000;42(1):2-20. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x
293.
Arnold DE. Chapters 5, 8 and 9. In: Ceramic Theory and Cultural Process. Vol New studies in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1985.
294.
Binford LR. Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity. 1962;28(2):217-225.
295.
Hastorf, Christine Ann, Conkey, Margaret Wright. The Uses of Style in Archaeology. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1989.
296.
Dobres MA. Social agency and practice: the heart and soul of technology. In: Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell Publishers; 2000:127-163.
297.
Hoffman, Christopher R., Dobres, Marcia-Anne. The Social Dynamics of Technology: Practice, Politics, and World Views. Smithsonian Institution Press; 1999.
298.
Robb JE, Dobres MA. Agency in archaeology: Paradigm or Platitude? In: Agency in Archaeology. Routledge; 2000:3-17.
299.
Dunnell RC. Style and function: A fundamental dichotomy. American Antiquity. 1978;43(2):192-202.
300.
Hegmon M. Archaeological research on style. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1992;21:517-536. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002505
301.
Hill JN, Evans RK. A model for classification and typology. In: Models in Archaeology. Methuen; 1972:231-273.
302.
Hodder I. Material practice, symbolism and ideology. In: Theory and Practice in Archaeology. Vol Material cultures. Routledge; 1992:201-212. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6f7f0b8f-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
303.
Hodder, Ian. Symbols in Action: Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture. Vol New studies in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1982.
304.
Hodder I. Post-modernism, post-structuralism and post-processual archaeology. In: The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression. Vol One world archaeology. Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic; 1989:64-78.
305.
Karlin C, Julien M. Prehistoric technology: a cognitive science? In: The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1994:152-163.
306.
Lemonnier P. The study of material culture today: Toward an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1986;5(2):147-186. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(86)90012-7
307.
Martinón-Torres M. Chaîne Opératoire: The concept and its aplications within the study of technology. Gallaecia. 2002;21:29-43. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=fb4bab91-db3d-ee11-8457-0050f2f06092
308.
Nelson MC. The study of technological organization. Archaeological Method and Theory. 1991;3:57-100.
309.
Pfaffenberger B. Social Anthropology of Technology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1992;21(1):491-516. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002423
310.
James R. Sackett. The Meaning of Style in Archaeology: A General Model. American Antiquity. 1977;42(3):369-380.
311.
Schlanger N. Mindful technology: unleashing the Chaine operatoire for an archaeology of mind. In: The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1994:143-151.
312.
Sigault F. Technology. In: Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Vol Routledge world reference. [New ed.]. Routledge; 2002:420-459. https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490
313.
Sinclair A. Constellations of knowledge: human agency and material affordance in lithic technology. In: Agency in Archaeology. Routledge; 2000:196-212.
314.
Tilley, Christopher Y. Metaphor and Material Culture. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell Publishers; 1999.
315.
van der Leeuw S. Dust to dust: a transformational view of the ceramic cycle. In: The Many Dimensions of Pottery: Ceramics in Archaeology and Anthropology. Vol Cingula. Universiteit van Amsterdam; 1984:709-733.
316.
Wiessner P. Style and changing relations between the individual and society. In: The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression. Vol One world archaeology. Unwin Hyman, HarperCollins Academic; 1989:56-63.
317.
Wobst HM. Stylistic behavior ad information exchange. In: For the Director: Research Essays in Honor of James B. Griffin. Vol Anthropological papers, Museum of Anthropology. University of Michigan. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan; 1977:317-342.
318.
Wobst HM. Style in archaeology or archaeologists in style. In: Material Meanings: Critical Approaches to the Interpretation of Material Culture. Vol Foundations of archaeological inquiry. University of Utah Press; 1999:118-132.
319.
Chris Gosden. What Do Objects Want? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 2005;12(3):193-211.
320.
Robb JE. The archaeology of symbols. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1998;27:329-346. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.329
321.
Sillar B. The Social Agency of Things? Animism and Materiality in the Andes. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2009;19(03):367-377. doi:10.1017/S0959774309000559
322.
Bentley A. ‘Style versus function’ 30 years on. In: Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Vol Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast; 2011:83-104.
323.
Chilton, Elizabeth S. Material Meanings: Critical Approaches to the Interpretation of Material Culture. Vol Foundations of archaeological inquiry. University of Utah Press; 1999.
324.
Cochrane EE. Style, function and systematic empiricism: the conflation of process and pattern. In: Style and Function: Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Archaeology. Bergin & Garvey; 2001:183-202.
325.
Renfrew, Colin, DeMarrais, Elizabeth, Gosden, Chris. Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World. Vol McDonald Institute monographs. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 2004.
326.
Ferguson L. Struggling with pots in colonial South Carolina. In: The Archaeology of Inequality. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell; 1991:28-39.
327.
Gosden C, Marshall Y. The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology. 1999;31(2):169-178.
328.
Hodder I. Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2011;17(1):154-177. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x
329.
Hodder I. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
330.
Ingold T. Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues. 2007;14(1):1-16. doi:10.1017/S1380203807002127
331.
Thomas, Julian, Jorge, Vítor Oliveira, Theoretical Archaeology Group (England). Overcoming the Modern Invention of Material Culture: Proceedings of the TAG Session, Exeter 2006. Vol Journal of Iberian archaeology. ADECAP; 2007.
332.
Knappett C. Photographs, Skeuomorphs and Marionettes: Some Thoughts on Mind, Agency and Object. Journal of Material Culture. 2002;7(1):97-117. doi:10.1177/1359183502007001307
333.
Knappett, Carl. Thinking through Material Culture: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Vol Archaeology, culture, and society. University of Pennsylvania Press; 2005.
334.
Knappet C. Materiality. In: Archaeological Theory Today. 2nd ed. Polity; 2012:188-207.
335.
Knappett, Carl, Malafouris, Lambros. Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach. Springer; 2008.
336.
Layton R. Structuralism and semiotics. In: Handbook of Material Culture. SAGE; 2006:29-42. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781446206430
337.
Meskell, Lynn. Object Worlds in Ancient Egypt: Material Biographies Past and Present. Vol Materializing culture. Berg; 2004.
338.
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of Materiality. Blackwell; 2006.
339.
Miller D. Artefacts and the meaning of things. In: Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Vol Routledge world reference. [New ed.]. Routledge; 2002:396-419. https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490
340.
Miller, Daniel. Materiality. Duke University Press; 2005.
341.
O’Brien MJ. Style, function, transmission: an introduction. In: Style, Function, Transmission: Evolutionary Archaeological Perspectives. Vol Foundations of archaeological inquiry. University of Utah Press; 2003:1-32.
342.
Olsen B. Material culture after text: re‐membering things. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 2003;36(2):87-104. doi:10.1080/00293650310000650
343.
Olsen B. Archaeology: The Discipline of Things. University of California Press; 2012.
344.
Preucel R, Bauer A. Archaeological Pragmatics. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 2001;34(2):85-96. doi:10.1080/00293650127469
345.
Preucel, Robert W. Archaeological Semiotics. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell; 2006.
346.
Sørensen MLS. Reading Dress: The Construction of Social Categories and Identities in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European Archaeology. 1997;5(1):93-114. doi:10.1179/096576697800703656
347.
Taylor T. Materiality. In: Handbook of Archaeological Theories. AltaMira Press; 2008:297-320. https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1
348.
Thomas J. Culture and identity. In: Companion Encyclopedia of Archaeology. Routledge; 1999:431-469.
349.
Thomas, Julian. Archaeology and Modernity. Routledge; 2004.
350.
Bentley, R. Alexander, Maschner, Herbert D. G., Chippindale, Christopher. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. AltaMira Press; 2008. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780759113602
351.
Steven Mithen. Understanding Mind and Culture: Evolutionary Psychology or Social Anthropology? Anthropology Today. 1995;11(6):3-7. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2783517?origin=crossref
352.
Shennan, Stephen. Genes, Memes and Human History: Darwinian Archaeology and Cultural Evolution. Thames & Hudson; 2002.
353.
Bettinger RL. Hunter-Gatherers: Archaeological and Evolutionary Theory. Vol Interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology. Plenum Press; 1991.
354.
Boone JL, Smith EA. Is It Evolution Yet? A Critique of Evolutionary Archaeology. Current Anthropology. 1998;39(S1):S141-S174. doi:10.1086/204693
355.
Cochrane, Ethan E., Gardner, Andrew. Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Vol Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast; 2011.
356.
Currie TE, Mace R. Mode and tempo in the evolution of socio-political organization: reconciling ‘Darwinian’ and ‘Spencerian’ evolutionary approaches in anthropology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2011;366(1567):1108-1117. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0318
357.
Kristiansen K. Genes versus agents. A discussion of the widening theoretical gap in archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues. 2004;11(2):77-99. doi:10.1017/S1380203805211509
358.
Mithen SJ. The Prehistory of the Mind: A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion and Science. Thames & Hudson; 1996.
359.
Mithen SJ. Thoughtful Foragers: A Study of Prehistoric Decision Making. Vol New studies in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1990.
360.
Richerson, Peter J., Boyd, Robert. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. University of Chicago Press; 2005.
361.
Rowley-Conwy P, Layton R, Panter-Brick C. Hunter-Gatherers: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Vol The Biosocial Society symposium series. Cambridge University Press; 2001.
362.
Winterhalder B, Kennett DJ, Grote MN, Bartruff J. Ideal free settlement of California’s Northern Channel Islands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2010;29(4):469-490. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2010.07.001
363.
Alex Mesoudi, Andrew Whiten and Kevin N. Laland. Perspective: Is Human Cultural Evolution Darwinian? Evidence Reviewed from the Perspective of ‘The Origin of Species’. Evolution. 2004;58(1):1-11. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3449291
364.
Shennan S. Descent with modification and the archaeological record. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2011;366(1567):1070-1079. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0380
365.
Shennan S. Evolution in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2008;37(1):75-91. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085153
366.
Andersson C. Paleolithic Punctuations and Equilibria: Did Retention Rather Than Invention Limit Technological Evolution? PaleoAnthropology. Published online 2011:243-259. http://www.paleoanthro.org/journal/volumes/2011/
367.
Aunger, Robert. Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science. Oxford University Press; 2000.
368.
R. Alexander Bentley, Matthew W. Hahn and Stephen J. Shennan. Random Drift and Culture Change. Proceedings: Biological Sciences. 2004;271(1547):1443-1450. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4142981
369.
Maschner, Herbert D. G., Chippindale, Christopher, Bentley, R. Alexander. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. AltaMira Press; 2008.
370.
Boyd, Robert, Richerson, Peter J. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press; 1985.
371.
Mace, Ruth, Holden, Clare Janaki, Shennan, Stephen. The Evolution of Cultural Diversity: A Phylogenetic Approach. UCL Press; 2005.
372.
Coward F, Shennan S, Colledge S, Conolly J, Collard M. The spread of Neolithic plant economies from the Near East to northwest Europe: a phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2008;35(1):42-56. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2007.02.022
373.
Lipo, Carl P., Society for American Archaeology. Mapping Our Ancestors: Phylogenetic Approaches in Anthropology and Prehistory. Aldine Transaction; 2006.
374.
Shennan, Stephen. Pattern and Process in Cultural Evolution. Vol Origins of human behavior and culture. University of California Press; 2009.
375.
Lyman RL, O’Brien MJ. Measuring and Explaining Change in Artifact Variation with Clade-Diversity Diagrams. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2000;19(1):39-74. doi:10.1006/jaar.1999.0339
376.
Powell A, Shennan S, Thomas MG. Late Pleistocene Demography and the Appearance of Modern Human Behavior. Science. 2009;324(5932):1298-1301. doi:10.1126/science.1170165
377.
Richerson PJ, Boyd R. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. University of Chicago Press; 2005.
378.
Shennan, Stephen. Genes, Memes and Human History: Darwinian Archaeology and Cultural Evolution. Thames & Hudson; 2002.
379.
Dobres MA, Robb JE. Agency in archaeology: Paradigm or platitude? In: Agency in Archaeology. Routledge; 2000:3-17.
380.
Dornan JL. Agency and archaeology: Past, present and future directions. Journal of archaeological method and theory. 2002;9(4):303-329. doi:10.1023/A:1021318432161
381.
Gardner A. Agency. In: Handbook of Archaeological Theories. AltaMira Press; 2008:95-108. https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1
382.
Barrett JC. Agency, the duality of structure and the problem of the archaeological record. In: Archaeological Theory Today. 2nd ed. Polity; 2012:141-164.
383.
Brumfiel EM. On the archaeology of choice: agency studies as a research strategem. In: Agency in Archaeology. Routledge; 2000:249-255.
384.
Cornell P, Fahlander F. Microarchaeology, materiality and social practice. Current Swedish Archaeology. 2002;10:21-38.
385.
Dobres, Marcia-Anne. Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell Publishers; 2000.
386.
Englehardt J. Agency in Ancient Writing. University Press of Colorado; 2013.
387.
Fewster KJ. The Role of Agency and Material Culture in Remembering and Forgetting: An Ethnoarchaeological Case Study from Central Spain. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology. 2006;20(1). doi:10.1558//jmea.2007.v20i1.89
388.
Flannery KV. Process and Agency in Early State Formation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 1999;9(1):3-21. doi:10.1017/S0959774300015183
389.
Gardner, Andrew. An Archaeology of Identity: Soldiers and Society in Late Roman Britain. Vol Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast Press; 2007. https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9781315435091/archaeology-identity-andrew-gardner
390.
Gardner A. Action and structure in interpretive archaeologies. In: Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Vol Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast; 2011:63-82.
391.
Graves-Brown P. In search of the watchmaker: attribution of agency in natural and cultural selection. In: Darwinian Archaeologies. Vol Interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology. Plenum Press; 1996:165-181.
392.
Johnson MH. Conceptions of agency in archaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1989;8(2):189-211. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(89)90024-X
393.
Knapp AB, van Dommelen P. Past Practices: Rethinking Individuals and Agents in Archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2008;18(01):15-34. doi:10.1017/S0959774308000024
394.
Kent G. Lightfoot, Antoinette Martinez and Ann M. Schiff. Daily Practice and Material Culture in Pluralistic Social Settings: An Archaeological Study of Culture Change and Persistence from Fort Ross, California. American Antiquity. 1998;63(2):199-222.
395.
MacGregor G. Post-processual archaeology: the hidden agenda of the secret agent. In: Archaeological Theory: Progress or Posture?. Vol Worldwide archaeology series. Avebury; 1994:79-91.
396.
Bentley RA, Maschner HDG, Chippindale C. R. McGuire. In: Handbook of Archaeological Theories. AltaMira Press; 2008:73-93. https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1
397.
Meskell, Lynn, Joyce, Rosemary A. Embodied Lives: Figuring Ancient Maya and Egyptian Experience. Routledge; 2003.
398.
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class et Cetera in Ancient Egypt. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell; 1999.
399.
Miller D, Tilley CY. Ideology, power and prehistory: An introduction. In: Ideology, Power and Prehistory. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1984:1-15.
400.
Pauketat TR. Practice and history in archaeology: An emerging paradigm. Anthropological Theory. 2001;1(1):73-98. doi:10.1177/146349960100100105
401.
Patterson T. Social archaeology and Marxist social thought. In: A Companion to Social Archaeology. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell Pub. Ltd; 2004:66-81. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605
402.
Shanks M, Tilley CY. The individual and the social. In: Social Theory and Archaeology. Polity in association with Blackwell; 1987:61-78.
403.
Shennan SJ. An evolutionary perspective on the goals of archaeology. In: Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Vol Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast; 2011:325-344.
404.
Thomas J. Humanism and the individual: chapter 6. In: Archaeology and Modernity. Routledge; 2004:119-148.
405.
Strauss C. Blaming for Columbine. Current Anthropology. 2007;48(6):807-832. doi:10.1086/520975
406.
Bruce G. Trigger. Marxism in Contemporary Western Archaeology. Archaeological Method and Theory. 1993;5:159-200.
407.
VanPool TL, VanPool CS. Agency and evolution: the role of intended and unintended consequences of action. In: Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory. Vol Foundations of archaeological inquiry. University of Utah Press; 2003:89-113.
408.
Brück J. Monuments, power and personhood in the British Neolithic. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2001;7(4):649-667. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.00082
409.
Fowler C. Personhood and Social Relations in the British Neolithic with a Study from the Isle of Man. Journal of Material Culture. 2001;6(2):137-163. doi:10.1177/135918350100600202
410.
Jones S. Discourses of identity in the interpretation of the past. In: Interpretive Archaeology: A Reader. Leicester University Press; 2000:445-457.
411.
Joyce RA. Archaeology of the Body. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2005;34(1):139-158. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143729
412.
Carrithers M, Collins S, Lukes S, eds. The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History. Cambridge University Press; 1985.
413.
Casella, Eleanor Conlin, Fowler, Chris. The Archaeology of Plural and Changing Identities: Beyond Identification. Kluwer Academic/Plenum; 2005.
414.
Díaz-Andreu García, Margarita. The Archaeology of Identity: Approaches to Gender, Age, Status, Ethnicity and Religion. Routledge; 2005.
415.
Geoff Emberling. Ethnicity in Complex Societies: Archaeological Perspectives. Journal of Archaeological Research. 1997;5(4):295-344.
416.
Fowler, Chris. The Archaeology of Personhood: An Anthropological Approach. Vol Themes in archaeology. Routledge; 2004.
417.
Fowler C. The individual, the subject and archaeological interpretation: reading Luce Irigaray and Judith Butler. In: Philosophy and Archaeological Practice: Perspectives for the 21st Century. Bricoleur Press; 2000:107-122.
418.
Gardner, Andrew. An Archaeology of Identity: Soldiers and Society in Late Roman Britain. Vol Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast Press; 2007. https://www-taylorfrancis-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/books/mono/10.4324/9781315435091/archaeology-identity-andrew-gardner
419.
Hales, Shelley, Hodos, Tamar. Material Culture and Social Identities in the Ancient World. Cambridge University Press; 2010.
420.
Jones, S. The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. Routledge; 1997.
421.
Jones S. Ethnicity: theoretical approaches, methodological implications. In: Handbook of Archaeological Theories. AltaMira Press; 2008:321-333.
422.
Knapp AB, Meskell L. Bodies of Evidence on Prehistoric Cyprus. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 1997;7(02):183-204. doi:10.1017/S0959774300001931
423.
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class et Cetera in Ancient Egypt. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell; 1999.
424.
Meskell, Lynn, Joyce, Rosemary A. Embodied Lives: Figuring Ancient Maya and Egyptian Experience. Routledge; 2003.
425.
Meskell L. Archaeologies of identity. In: Archaeological Theory Today. 2nd ed. Polity; 2012:187-213.
426.
Pluciennik, Mark, Tarlow, Sarah, Hamilakis, Yannis. Thinking through the Body: Archaeologies of Corporeality. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002.
427.
Rautman, Alison E., Gender and Archaeology Conference. Reading the Body: Representations and Remains in the Archaeological Record. Vol Regendering the past. University of Pennsylvania Press; 2000.
428.
Ross, Jennifer C., Steadman, Sharon R. Agency and Identity in the Ancient Near East: New Paths Forward. Vol Approaches to anthropological archaeology. Equinox; 2010.
429.
Smith, Stuart Tyson. Wretched Kush: Ethnic Identities and Boudaries in Egypt’s Nubian Empire. Routledge; 2003.
430.
Sofaer, Joanna R. The Body as Material Culture: A Theoretical Osteoarchaeology. Vol Topics in contemporary archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816666
431.
Stark, Miriam T. The Archaeology of Social Boundaries. Vol Smithsonian series in archaeological inquiry. Smithsonian Institution Press; 1998.
432.
Thomas J. Culture and identity. In: Companion Encyclopedia of Archaeology. Routledge; 1999:431-469.
433.
Thomas J. Chapter 6. In: Archaeology and Modernity. Routledge; 2004.
434.
Whitehouse R. Cultural and biological approaches to the body in archaeology: can they be reconciled?" . In: Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies: A Dialogue. Vol Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast; 2011:227-244.
435.
Whitley J. Homer’s Entangled Objects: Narrative, Agency and Personhood In and Out of Iron Age Texts. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2013;23(03):395-416. doi:10.1017/S095977431300053X
436.
Wilkinson D. The Emperor’s New Body: Personhood, Ontology and the Inka Sovereign. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2013;23(03):417-432. doi:10.1017/S0959774313000541
437.
Yates T. Frameworks for an archaeology of the body. In: Interpretative Archaeology. Vol Explorations in anthropology. Berg; 1992:31-72.
438.
Conkey MW, Gero JM. Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1997;26(1):411-437. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.411
439.
Whitehouse R. Feminism and archaeology: An awkward relationship. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology. 1998;9:1-7.
440.
Wylie A. The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: Recent archaeological research on gender. American Antiquity. 1992;57(1):15-35.
441.
Carr, Lydia. Tessa Verney Wheeler: Women and Archaeology before World War Two. Oxford University Press; 2012. doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199640225.001.0001
442.
Margaret W. Conkey. Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 2007;14(3):285-310.
443.
Conkey MW, Spector JD. Archaeology and the Study of Gender. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 1984;7:1-38.
444.
Dowson TA. Homosexuality, queer theory and archaeology. In: Interpretive Archaeology: A Reader. Leicester University Press; 2000:283-289.
445.
Engelstad E. Images of power and contradiction: Feminist theory and post-processual archaeology. Antiquity. 1991;65(248):502-514.
446.
Geller PL. Identity and Difference: Complicating Gender in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2009;38(1):65-81. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164414
447.
Gilchrist R. Archaeology and the life course: a time and age for gender. In: A Companion to Social Archaeology. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell Pub. Ltd; 2004:142-160. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605
448.
Gilchrist R. Women’s archaeology? Political feminism, gender theory and historical revision. Antiquity. 1991;65(248):495-501.
449.
Hamilton S, Whitehouse R, Wright KI. Introduction and section 1. In: Archaeology and Women: Ancient & Modern Issues. Vol Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast Press; 2007:13-40.
450.
Hastorf C. Gender, space and food in prehistory. In: Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell; 1991:132-159.
451.
Hays-Gilpin K. Gender. In: Handbook of Archaeological Theories. AltaMira Press; 2008:335-349. https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1
452.
Hill E. Gender-informed archaeology: The priority of definition, the use of analogy, and the multivariate approach. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 1998;5(1):99-128. doi:10.1007/BF02428417
453.
Joyce R. Embodied subjectivity: gender, feminity, masculinity, sexuality. In: A Companion to Social Archaeology. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell Pub. Ltd; 2004:82-95. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605
454.
Moore HL. Bodies on the move: gender, power and material culture. In: A Passion for Difference: Essays in Anthropology and Gender. Polity; 1994:71-85.
455.
Nelson, Sarah M. Handbook of Gender in Archaeology. Vol Gender and archaeology series. AltaMira Press; 2006.
456.
Pope R. Processual archaeology and gender politics. The loss of innocence. Archaeological Dialogues. 2011;18(1):59-86. doi:10.1017/S1380203811000134
457.
Pope R. Processual archaeology and gender politics. The loss of innocence. Archaeological Dialogues. 2011;18(01):59-86. doi:10.1017/S1380203811000134
458.
Rega E. Age, gender and biological reality in the Early Bronze Age cemetery at Mokrin. In: Invisible People and Processes: Writing Gender and Childhood into European Archaeology. Leicester University Press; 1996:229-247.
459.
Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig. Gender Archaeology. Polity Press; 2000.
460.
Spector J. What this awl means: towards a feminist archaeology. In: Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell; 1991:388-406.
461.
Treherne P. The warrior’s beauty: the masculine body and self-identity in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European archaeology: journal of the European Association of Archaeologists. 1995;3(1):105-144.
462.
Tringham R. Engendered places in prehistory. In: Interpretive Archaeology: A Reader. Leicester University Press; 2000:329-357.
463.
Wylie A. Gender theory and the archaeological record: Why is there no archaeology of gender? In: Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell; 1991:31-54.
464.
Alison Wylie. Doing Archaeology as a Feminist: Introduction. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 2007;14(3):209-216.
465.
Kohl PL. Nationalism and archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1998;27(1):223-246. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.223
466.
Tilley CY. Archaeology as socio-political action in the present. In: Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology: Essays in the Philosophy, History and Socio-Politics of Archaeology. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1989:104-116.
467.
Trigger BG. Alternative archaeologies: Nationalist, colonialist, imperialist. Man. 1984;19(3):355-370.
468.
Arnold B. The past as propaganda: Totalitarian archaeology in Nazi Germany. Antiquity. 1990;64(244):464-478.
469.
Banks, Iain, O’Sullivan, Jerry, Atkinson, John A., Scottish Archaeological Forum. Nationalism and Archaeology: Scottish Archaeological Forum. Cruithne Press; 1996.
470.
Reinhard Bernbeck and Susan Pollock. Ayodhya, Archaeology, and Identity. Current Anthropology. 1996;37(1):S138-S142.
471.
Bernbeck R, Pollock S. The political economy of archaeological practice and the production of heritage in the Middle East. In: A Companion to Social Archaeology. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell Pub. Ltd; 2004:335-352. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605
472.
Colwell-Chanthaphonh C. Archaeology and indigenous collaboration. In: Archaeological Theory Today. 2nd ed. Polity; 2012:267-291.
473.
Fagan, Garrett G. Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public. Routledge; 2006.
474.
Fowler D. Archaeological ethics in context and practice. In: Handbook of Archaeological Theories. AltaMira Press; 2008:409-422. https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/156042?page=0&startBookmarkId=-1
475.
Gosden C. Postcolonial archaeology. Issues of culture, identity and knowledge. In: Archaeological Theory Today. 2nd ed. Polity; 2012:241-261.
476.
Gosden C. The past and foreign countries: colonial and post-colonial archaeology and anthropology. In: A Companion to Social Archaeology. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell Pub. Ltd; 2004:161-178. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605
477.
James, Simon. The Atlantic Celts: Ancient People or Modern Invention? British Museum Press; 1999.
478.
Kohl PL, Fawcett C. Archaeology in the service of the state: theoretical considerations. In: Nationalism, Politics, and the Practice of Archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1995:3-18.
479.
Kohl PL. Nationalism and Archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1998;27(1):223-246. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.223
480.
Layton, Robert. Who Needs the Past?: Indigenous Values and Archaeology. Vol One world archaeology. Routledge; 1994.
481.
Leone et al. M. Can an African-American historical archaeology be an alternative voice? In: Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past. Routledge; 1994:110-124.
482.
Leone, Mark P. The Archaeology of Liberty in an American Capital: Excavations in Annapolis. University of California Press; 2005. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1ppc5g
483.
Leone M, Preucel R. Archaeology in a democratic society: a critical perspective. In: Quandaries and Quests: Visions of Archaeology’s Future. Vol Occasional paper / Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale; 1992:115-135.
484.
McGuire R. Contested pasts: archaeology and Native Americans. In: A Companion to Social Archaeology. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell Pub. Ltd; 2004:374-395.
485.
McGuire, Randall H. Archaeology as Political Action. Vol California series in public anthropology. University of California Press; 2008.
486.
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeology under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Routledge; 1998.
487.
Meskell L. The Intersections of Identity and Politics in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2002;31(1):279-301. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085457
488.
Murray T. Communication and the importance of disciplinary communities: who owns the past? In: Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda?. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1993:105-116.
489.
Pearson MP, Schadla-Hall T, Moshenska G. Resolving the Human Remains Crisis in British Archaeology. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology. 2011;21:5-9. doi:10.5334/pia.369
490.
Ratnagar S. Archaeology at the Heart of a Political Confrontation: The Case of Ayodhya. Current Anthropology. 2004;45(2):239-259. doi:10.1086/381044
491.
Reid, Donald M. Whose Pharaohs?: Archaeology, Museums, and Egyptian National Identity from Napoleon to World War I. University of California Press; 2002.
492.
Saitta, Dean J. The Archaeology of Collective Action. Vol The American experience in archaeological perspective. University Press of Florida; 2007.
493.
Smith, Laurajane. Archaeological Theory and the Politics of Cultural Heritage. Routledge; 2004.
494.
Stottman, M. Jay. Archaeologists as Activists: Can Archaeologists Change the World? University of Alabama Press; 2010.
495.
Tarlow S, Stutz LN. Can an archaeologist be a public intellectual? Archaeological Dialogues. 2013;20(01):1-5. doi:10.1017/S1380203813000032
496.
Thomas, David Hurst. Skull Wars: Kennewick Man, Archaeology, and the Battle for Native American Identity. Basic Books; 2000.
497.
Trigger BG. Archaeology and the image of the American Indian. American Antiquity. 1980;45(4):662-676.
498.
Wylie A. The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: Recent archaeological research on gender. American Antiquity. 1992;57(1):15-35.
499.
Wylie A. Alternative histories. Epistemic disunity and political integrity. In: Making Alternative Histories: The Practice of Archaeology and History in Non-Western Settings. Vol School of American Research advanced seminar series. School of American Research Press; 1995:255-272.
500.
Zimmerman, Larry J., Vitelli, Karen D., Hollowell-Zimmer, Julie. Ethical Issues in Archaeology. Altamira Press; 2003.
501.
Clarke DL. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity. 1973;47(185):6-18.
502.
Ian Hodder. Postprocessual Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 1985;8:1-26.
503.
Tilley C. Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2004;14(2):185-203. doi:10.1017/S0959774304000125
504.
Fisher P, Farrelly C, Maddocks A, Ruggles C. Spatial Analysis of Visible Areas from the Bronze Age Cairns of Mull. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1997;24(7):581-592. doi:10.1006/jasc.1996.0142
505.
Flannery KV. Process and Agency in Early State Formation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 1999;9(1):3-21. doi:10.1017/S0959774300015183
506.
Joyce RA. Unintended Consequences? Monumentality as a Novel Experience in Formative Mesoamerica. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 2004;11(1):5-29.
507.
Megaw JVS, Megaw MR. Ancient Celts and Modern Ethnicity. Antiquity. 1996;70(267):175-181.
508.
James S. Celts, politics and motivation in archaeology. Antiquity. 1998;72(275):200-209.
509.
VanPool CS, VanPool TL. The scientific nature of post-processualism. American Antiquity. 1999;64(1):33-53.
510.
Arnold III PJ, Wilkens BS. On the VanPools’ ‘scientific’ post-processualism. American Antiquity. 2001;66(2):361-366.
511.
Hutson SR. Synergy through disunity, science as social practice: Comments on VanPool and VanPool. American Antiquity. 2001;66(2):349-360.
512.
VanPool TL, VanPool CS. Postprocessualism and the nature of science: A response to comments by Hutson and Arnold and Wilkens. American Antiquity. 2001;66(2):367-375.
513.
Hodder I. ‘Always momentary, fluid and flexible’: Towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity. 1997;71(273):691-700.
514.
Hassan F. Beyond the surface: Comments on Hodder’s reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity. 1997;71(274):1020-1025.
515.
Hodder I. Whose rationality? A response to Fekri Hassan. Antiquity. 1998;72(275):213-217.
516.
Bamforth DB. Evidence and metaphor in evolutionary archaeology. American Antiquity. 2002;67(3):435-452.
517.
O’Brien MJ, Lyman RL, Leonard RD. What is evolution? A response to Bamforth. American Antiquity. 2003;68(3):573-580.
518.
Bamforth DB. What is archaeology? (Or confusion, sound and fury, signifying....). American Antiquity. 2003;68(3):581-584.